Natural history of treatment-emergent central sleep apnea on positive airway pressure: A systematic review

Central sleep apnea: emphasizing recognition and differentiation

INTRODUCTION

Central sleep apnea (CSA) is a sleep-related breathing disorder in which the effort to breathe is intermittently diminished or absent. CSA is a common disorder among patients with different cardiovascular disorders, including heart failure. In addition, a growing number of medications have been shown to induce CSA and CSA can emerge after initiation of treatment for obstructive sleep apnea. Accumulating evidence shows that CSA is a heterogeneous disorder with individual differences in clinical and biological characteristics and/or underlying pathophysiological mechanisms.

AREAS COVERED

This narrative review offers an overview of the diagnostic aspects and classification of CSA, with an emphasis on heart failure patients, patients with CSA due to a medication and treatment-emergent CSA. The importance of evaluation of prognostic biomarkers in patients with different types of CSA is discussed. This narrative review synthesizes literature on CSA sourced from the PubMed database up to February 2024.

EXPERT OPINION

CSA presents a remarkably diverse disorder, with treatment modalities exhibiting potentially varied efficacy across its various phenotypes. This highlights the imperative for tailored management strategies that are rooted in phenotype classification.

Predictors of Initial CPAP Prescription and Subsequent Course with CPAP in Patients with Central Sleep Apneas at a Single Center

PURPOSE

Guidelines recommend considering an initial trial of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) to treat central sleep apnea (CSA). However, practice patterns vary widely. This study investigated predictors for an initial trial of CPAP in patients with central apneas and whether those factors predict adequate treatment response in patients receiving an initial CPAP trial.

METHODS

Charts of patients receiving a diagnostic code for CSA following a sleep study during 2016-2018 at a single center were reviewed. Patient factors, initial treatment prescriptions, and subsequent changes to therapy were extracted from electronic health records. Regression models were used to estimate factors associated with an initial CPAP prescription and the likelihood of an adequate CPAP response (no subsequent therapy change and no discontinuation of therapy) among patients prescribed CPAP.

RESULTS

429/588 (73%) patients with central apneas received an initial trial of CPAP. Younger age, diagnosis by home sleep testing, non-opiate etiology of central apneas, and a lower proportion of central apneas at diagnosis were independently associated with a higher likelihood of an initial CPAP trial. A lower proportion of central apneas was associated with a higher probability of adequate response, while current smoking and opiate-related central apneas predicted an unsuccessful CPAP trial. A new finding was that older age predicted a lower likelihood of an initial CPAP prescription but did not predict an unsatisfactory response to CPAP.

CONCLUSION

Clinicians may incorrectly weigh certain clinical and sleep study characteristics when deciding whether to trial CPAP for patients with central apneas.

Predictors of Initial CPAP Prescription and Subsequent Course with CPAP in Patients with Central Sleep Apneas

Purpose

Guidelines recommend considering an initial trial of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) to treat central sleep apnea (CSA). However, practice patterns vary widely. This study investigated predictors for an initial trial of CPAP in patients with central apneas and whether those factors predict adequate treatment response in patients receiving an initial CPAP trial.

Methods

Charts of patients receiving a diagnostic code for CSA following a sleep study during 2016-2018 at a single center were reviewed. Patient factors, initial treatment prescriptions, and subsequent changes to therapy were extracted from electronic health records. Regression models were used to estimate factors associated with an initial CPAP prescription and the likelihood of an adequate CPAP response (no subsequent therapy change or nonadherence) among patients prescribed CPAP.

Results

429/588 (73%) patients with central apneas received an initial trial of CPAP. Younger age, diagnosis by home sleep testing, non-opiate etiology of central apneas, and a lower proportion of central apneas at diagnosis were independently associated with a higher likelihood of an initial CPAP trial. A lower proportion of central apneas was associated with a higher probability of adequate response, while current smoking and opiate-related central apneas predicted an unsuccessful CPAP trial. A new finding was that older age predicted a lower likelihood of an initial CPAP prescription but did not predict a suboptimal response to CPAP.

Conclusion

Clinicians may incorrectly weigh certain clinical and sleep study characteristics when deciding whether to trial CPAP for patients with central apneas.

International Consensus Statement on Obstructive Sleep Apnea

BACKGROUND

Evaluation and interpretation of the literature on obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) allows for consolidation and determination of the key factors important for clinical management of the adult OSA patient. Toward this goal, an international collaborative of multidisciplinary experts in sleep apnea evaluation and treatment have produced the International Consensus statement on Obstructive Sleep Apnea (ICS:OSA).

METHODS

Using previously defined methodology, focal topics in OSA were assigned as literature review (LR), evidence-based review (EBR), or evidence-based review with recommendations (EBR-R) formats. Each topic incorporated the available and relevant evidence which was summarized and graded on study quality. Each topic and section underwent iterative review and the ICS:OSA was created and reviewed by all authors for consensus.

RESULTS

The ICS:OSA addresses OSA syndrome definitions, pathophysiology, epidemiology, risk factors for disease, screening methods, diagnostic testing types, multiple treatment modalities, and effects of OSA treatment on multiple OSA-associated comorbidities. Specific focus on outcomes with positive airway pressure (PAP) and surgical treatments were evaluated.

CONCLUSION

This review of the literature consolidates the available knowledge and identifies the limitations of the current evidence on OSA. This effort aims to create a resource for OSA evidence-based practice and identify future research needs. Knowledge gaps and research opportunities include improving the metrics of OSA disease, determining the optimal OSA screening paradigms, developing strategies for PAP adherence and longitudinal care, enhancing selection of PAP alternatives and surgery, understanding health risk outcomes, and translating evidence into individualized approaches to therapy.

Experience With Adaptive Servo-Ventilation Among Veterans in the Post-SERVE-HF Era

Background

The sleep medicine community has struggled to identify the ideal role for adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) therapy following a study that found increased mortality in patients with central sleep apnea (CSA) and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction who used ASV therapy. We aimed to identify characteristics of patients who benefit from ASV therapy.

Methods

We performed a record review of all patients treated with ASV therapy at the Hampton Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Virginia from January 1, 2015, to April 30, 2020. Clinical and polysomnographic characteristics of patients adherent to therapy were compared with those that were not adherent.

Results

Our cohort of 31 patients was entirely male with a mean age of 67.2 years, body mass index of 34.0, and Epworth Sleepiness Scale score of 10.9. Primary CSA was initially diagnosed in 3 patients (10%), comorbid obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and CSA in 9 (29%), and primary OSA in 19 (61%). Seventeen patients (55%) met minimal adherence criteria with ASV therapy. The obstructive apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), as a proportion of the total pretreatment AHI, was higher in adherent patients (81.5%) vs nonadherent patients (46.7%) (P = .02). The median residual AHI was lower in the adherent group, both as absolute values (1.7 vs 4.7 events/h; P = .004) and as a percentage of the pretreatment AHI (3.1% vs 10.2%; P = .002).

Conclusions

Patients using ASV devices regularly have a larger component of obstructive sleep-disordered breathing and obtain greater objective benefit from ASV than those that do not. This understanding may help to identify patients that will most benefit from this debated form of therapy.

Practice recommendations for the role of physiotherapy in the management of sleep disorders: the 2022 Brazilian Sleep Association Guidelines

This clinical guideline supported by the Brazilian Sleep Association comprises a brief history of the development of Brazilian sleep physiotherapy, outlines the role of the physiotherapist as part of a sleep health team, and describes the clinical guidelines in respect of the management of some sleep disorders by the physiotherapist (including sleep breathing disorders, i.e., obstructive sleep apnea, central sleep apnea, upper airway resistance syndrome, hypoventilation syndromes and overlap syndrome, and pediatric sleep breathing disorders; sleep bruxism; circadian rhythms disturbances; insomnia; and Willis-Ekbom disease/periodic limb movement disorder. This clinical practice guideline reflects the state of the art at the time of publication and will be reviewed and updated as new information becomes available.

[Treatment-Emergent Central Sleep Apnea - Detection and Treatment]

Treatment-Emergent Central Sleep Apnea - Detection and Treatment Abstract. In treatment-emergent central sleep apnea (TECSA), affected patients with obstructive sleep apnea newly develop central sleep apnea (AHI central ≥5/h) under therapy with positive pressure ventilation which cannot be explained by other causes. The pathophysiology of TECSA is incompletely understood. PaCO2 and the associated apnea threshold seem to play a central role. The incidence of TECSA varies (1.8-20%), and in about 2/3 of cases it is self-limiting in the course of the therapy. If persistence or new onset occurs later in the course of positive pressure therapy, a further evaluation (e.g., echocardiography, neurologic examination, medication history) is indicated. Effective treatment options include a change in ventilation therapy (adaptive servoventilation or bilevel ventilation with back-up frequency) or additional nocturnal oxygen supplementation; these options should be decided case by case.

A longitudinal study of the accuracy of positive pressure therapy machine-detected apnea-hypopnea events

STUDY OBJECTIVES

During positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy for sleep apnea syndromes, the machine detected respiratory event index (REI_FLOW) is an important method for clinicians to evaluate the beneficial effects of PAP. There are concerns about the accuracy of this detection, which also confounds a related question-how common and severe are residual events on PAP.

METHODS

Subjects with OSA who underwent a split night polysomnography were recruited prospectively. Those treated with PAP and tracked by the EncoreAnywhere system were analyzed. The ones who stopped PAP within one month were excluded for this analysis. Compliance, therapy data and waveform data were analyzed. Machine detected versus manually scored events were compared at the 1st, 3rd, 6th and 12th month from PAP initiation. Logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with a high REI_FLOW difference.

RESULTS

One hundred and seventy-nine patients with a mean age 59.06 ± 13.97 years old, median body mass index 33.60 (29.75-38.75) kg/m², and median baseline AHI 46.30 (31.50-65.90) times/hour were included. The difference between the machine detected REI_FLOW and manually scored REI_FLOW was 10.72 ±8.43 in the first month and remained stable for up to 12 months. Male sex and large leak ≥ 1.5% were more frequent in patients who had an REI_FLOW difference of ≥ 5 / hour of use. A titration arousal index ≥ 15/ hour of sleep, and higher ratio of unstable to stable breathing were also associated with an REI_FLOW difference ≥ 5 times/hour of use.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a substantial and sustained difference between manual and automated event estimates during PAP therapy, and some associated factors were identified.

Residual excessive daytime sleepiness in patients treated for obstructive sleep apnea: guidance for assessment, diagnosis, and management

Excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) affects approximately half of patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and can persist in some despite normalization of breathing, oxygenation, and sleep quality with primary OSA therapy, such as continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). EDS is often overlooked and under discussed in the primary care setting and in the follow-up of CPAP-treated patients due to difficult assessment of such a multi-dimensional symptom. This review aims to provide suggestions for procedures that can be implemented into routine clinical practice to identify, evaluate, and manage EDS in patients treated for OSA, including how to appropriately use various self-report and objective assessments along the clinical pathway and options for pharmacotherapy. In addition, examples of when it is appropriate to refer a patient to a sleep specialist for evaluation are discussed.

Treatment-emergent central sleep apnea associated with non-positive airway pressure therapies in obstructive sleep apnea patients: A systematic review

This systematic review summarizes the prevalence of treatment-emergent central sleep apnea (TECSA) occurring with therapies other than positive airway pressure (PAP) for the management of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). We describe its natural course as well as the proposed underlying pathophysiological mechanisms and the clinical management of affected patients. A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Web of science, and the Cochrane Library was performed until June 2020. Eighteen studies (n = 284 patients) were included. TECSA was observed in 31 patients with the use of four different medical devices (mandibular advancement device, hypoglossal nerve stimulation, tongue stabilizing device and nasal expiratory PAP) and after three different types of surgical treatments (tracheostomy, maxillofacial surgery and oro-nasal surgery). Due to the paucity of data available, it was not possible to establish a clear prevalence rate of TECSA for each alternative treatment. After the initiation of non-PAP treatments, a systematic reassessment of the treatment efficacy with follow-up sleep studies will be helpful to identify TECSA. A spontaneous resolution over time was described as well as a persistence of TECSA. In this case, treatment should focus on patients' specific underlying pathophysiology. Overall, the limited current literature suggests that this phenomenon is rare (<4%).

Central Sleep Apnea

Central sleep apnea (CSA) is characterized by intermittent repetitive cessation and/or decreased breathing without effort caused by an abnormal ventilatory drive. Although less prevalent than obstructive sleep apnea, it is frequently encountered. CSA can be primary (idiopathic) or secondary in association with Cheyne-Stokes respiration, drug-induced, medical conditions such as chronic renal failure, or high-altitude periodic breathing. Risk factors have been proposed, including gender, age, heart failure, opioid use, stroke, and other chronic medical conditions. This article discusses the prevalence of CSA in the general population and within each of these at-risk populations, and clinical presentation, diagnostic methods, and treatment.

Treatment-emergent central sleep apnea: a unique sleep-disordered breathing

Treatment-emergent central sleep apnea (TECSA) is a specific form of sleep-disordered breathing, characterized by the emergence or persistence of central apneas during treatment for obstructive sleep apnea. The purpose of this review was to summarize the definition, epidemiology, potential mechanisms, clinical characteristics, and treatment of TECSA. We searched for relevant articles up to January 31, 2020, in the PubMed database. The prevalence of TECSA varied widely in different studies. The potential mechanisms leading to TECSA included ventilatory control instability, low arousal threshold, activation of lung stretch receptors, and prolonged circulation time. TECSA may be a self-limited disorder in some patients and could be resolved spontaneously over time with ongoing treatment of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). However, central apneas persist even with the regular CPAP therapy in some patients, and new treatment approaches such as adaptive servo-ventilation may be necessary. We concluded that several questions regarding TECSA remain, despite the findings of many studies, and it is necessary to carry out large surveys with basic scientific design and clinical trials for TECSA to clarify these irregularities. Further, it will be vital to evaluate the baseline demographic and polysomnographic data of TECSA patients more carefully and comprehensively.

A case of Cheyne-Stokes breathing emerging in a patient with atrial fibrillation and an implanted hypoglossal nerve stimulator

NONE

Treatment emergent central sleep apnea (TECSA) can occur with positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy, mandibular advancement devices, and now recent cases with hypoglossal nerve stimulator (HNS) therapy during treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). There have been few published reports of Cheyne-Stokes breathing (CSB) emerging after implantation of a hypoglossal nerve stimulator (HNS). We present a case of a 76-year-old male with chronic atrial fibrillation and OSA who developed significant CSB after implantation of a HNS device. As popularity increases for alternative treatments of OSA, there should be close monitoring for emergence of CSB, especially in those who may have a propensity for high loop gain abnormalities contributing to central sleep apneas, such as patients with chronic atrial fibrillation. Further research is needed on CSA in patients with HNS implantation and atrial fibrillation, the prevalence of TECSA in the growing HNS therapy population, and the development of future management strategies.

Treatment-Emergent Central Apnea: Physiologic Mechanisms Informing Clinical Practice

The purpose of this review was to describe our management approach to patients with treatment-emergent central sleep apnea (TECSA). The emergence of central sleep apnea during positive airway pressure therapy occurs in approximately 8% of titration studies for OSA, and it has been associated with several demographic, clinical, and polysomnographic factors, as well as factors related to the titration study itself. TECSA shares similar pathophysiology with central sleep apnea. In fact, central and OSA pathophysiologic mechanisms are inextricably intertwined, with ventilatory instability and upper airway narrowing occurring in both entities. TECSA is a "dynamic" process, with spontaneous resolution with ongoing positive airway pressure therapy in most patients, persistence in some, or appearing de novo in a minority of patients. Management strategy for TECSA aims to eliminate abnormal respiratory events, stabilize sleep architecture, and improve the underlying contributing medical comorbidities. CPAP therapy remains a standard therapy for TECSA. Expectant management is appropriate given its transient nature in most cases, whereas select patients would benefit from an early switch to an alternative positive airway pressure modality. Other treatment options include supplemental oxygen and pharmacologic therapy.

ATS Core Curriculum 2020. Adult Sleep Medicine

The American Thoracic Society Core Curriculum updates clinicians annually in adult and pediatric pulmonary disease, medical critical care, and sleep medicine, in a 3–4-year recurring cycle of topics. These topics will be presented at the 2020 Virtual Conference. Below is the adult sleep medicine core that includes topics pertinent to sleep-disordered breathing and insomnia.

High flow nasal cannula treatment for obstructive sleep apnea in infants and young children

BACKGROUND

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the nonsurgical treatment of choice for children with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). However, CPAP limitations include difficulty with adherence and midface hypoplasia risk. We, therefore, sought to assess the effect of warm humidified air delivered via open nasal cannula (HFNC) on OSA in children in the sleep laboratory and at home.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed among children recommended treatment of OSA with HFNC. Reasons for HFNC recommendation included poor surgical candidacy, residual OSA following surgery, and CPAP intolerance. Children underwent both diagnostic and HFNC titration sleep studies and were prescribed HFNC for home use. Standard sleep architecture, arousals, and apnea-hypopnea indices (AHI) were assessed with the evaluation of reported adherence and complications over 12 months of treatment.

RESULTS

Twenty-two children (average 12.8 months, 95% confidence interval [95% CI: 7.0, 18.6]) with OSA (obstructive AHI [OAHI] range: 4.8-89.2 events/h) underwent HFNC titration with significant reduction in OAHI (28.9 events/h [17.6, 40.2] vs 2.6 [1.1, 4.0]; P < .001) (mean [95% CI]). Nineteen patients received home HFNC treatment. By 12 months, four patients were lost to follow-up and OSA resolved in three patients (16%). Of 12 remaining patients, 7 (58%) continued therapy while 5 (42%) discontinued due to intolerance. The most common treatment complication was cannula dislodgement. Additional complications included skin irritation, dry mucus membranes, restlessness, oxygen desaturation, and increased central apneas.

CONCLUSION

HFNC offers a treatment alternative to CPAP in infants and young children with OSA and was well tolerated at home in our study.

Adaptive Servo-Ventilation: A Comprehensive Descriptive Study in the Geneva Lake Area

Background: Use of adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) has been questioned in patients with central sleep apnea (CSA) and chronic heart failure (CHF). This study aims to detail the present use of ASV in clinical practice.

Methods: Descriptive, cross-sectional, multicentric study of patients undergoing long term (≥3 months) ASV in the Cantons of Geneva or Vaud (1,288,378 inhabitants) followed by public or private hospitals, private practitioners and/or home care providers.

Results: Patients included (458) were mostly male (392; 85.6%), overweight [BMI (median, IQR): 29 kg/m² (26; 33)], comorbid, with a median age of 71 years (59–77); 84% had been treated by CPAP before starting ASV. Indications for ASV were: emergent sleep apnea (ESA; 337; 73.6%), central sleep apnea (CSA; 108; 23.6%), obstructive sleep apnea (7; 1.5%), and overlap syndrome (6; 1.3%). Origin of CSA was cardiac (n = 30), neurological (n = 26), idiopathic (n = 28), or drug-related (n = 22). Among CSA cases, 60 (56%) patients had an echocardiography within the preceding 12 months; median left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 62.5% (54–65); 11 (18%) had a LVEF ≤45%. Average daily use of ASV was [mean (SD)] 368 (140) min; 13% used their device <3:30 h. Based on ventilator software, apnea-hypopnea index was normalized in 94% of subjects with data available (94% of 428).

Conclusions: Use of ASV has evolved from its original indication (CSA in CHF) to a heterogeneous predominantly male, aged, comorbid, and overweight population with mainly ESA or CSA. CSA in CHF represented only 6.5% of this population. Compliance and correction of respiratory events were satisfactory.

Clinical Trial Registration:www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT04054570.

Elevated Central and Mixed Apnea Index after Upper Airway Stimulation

Objective

Upper airway stimulation (UAS) is used to treat patients with moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The aim of this study is to report the incidence and potential predictors of elevated central and mixed apnea index (CMAI) after UAS.

Study Design

Retrospective chart review of patients undergoing UAS.

Setting

Tertiary care center.

Subjects and Methods

Included patients underwent UAS for OSA at our institution between 2014 and 2018. Data collected included demographic information, implantation records, and pre- and postoperative polysomnography (PSG) results. CMAI ≥5 was considered elevated. Post hoc univariate analysis was performed to evaluate factors associated with elevated CMAI.

Results

In total, 141 patients underwent UAS at our institution. This included 94 men and 47 women with a mean age of 61.2 ± 11.0 years and a mean body mass index of 29.1 ± 3.9 kg/m2. Five patients had an elevated CMAI after surgery during UAS titration. Demographics, comorbid conditions, and device settings were not associated with an elevated postoperative CMAI ( P > .05).

Conclusion

The occurrence of an elevated CMAI after surgery may represent treatment-emergent events. Demographics, comorbid conditions, and UAS device settings were not associated with central and mixed apneic events.

Level of Evidence

4

Nocturnal bilevel positive airway pressure for the treatment of asthma

Nocturnal worsening of asthma may be due to reduced lung volumes and fewer sigh breaths, which have been shown to increase airway resistance and bronchoreactivity. We hypothesized that mimicking deep inspiration using nocturnal mechanical support would improve symptoms in patients with asthma. Subjects with asthma underwent usual care and bilevel positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy for 4 weeks, separated by 4 weeks, and methacholine challenge (PC20) and subjective assessments. 13 patients with asthma alone and 8 with asthma + OSA completed the protocol. Change in bronchoreactivity (ratio of Post/Pre PC20) was not significantly different during usual care and bilevel PAP [0.86 (IQR 0.19, 1.82) vs 0.94 (IQR 0.56, 2.5), p = 0.88], nor was the change in Asthma Control Test different: 0.1 ± 2.2 vs. -0.2 ± 2.9, p = 0.79, respectively. Bilevel PAP therapy for four weeks did not improve subjective or objective measures of asthma severity in patients with asthma or those with asthma and OSA, although there was heterogeneity in response.

The use and effectiveness of adaptive servo ventilation in central sleep apnea: a study of consecutive sleep clinic patients

The use of adaptive servo ventilation to treat central sleep apnea in the clinical setting is incompletely understood and could be under-utilized. We reviewed our experience of adaptive servo ventilation use in patients with central sleep apnea. This study shows the effectiveness of adaptive servo ventilation in treating patients with central sleep apnea, irrespective of a predisposing factor, as assessed during a 4-week treatment trial. Results show that adaptive servo ventilation was effective and superior to continuous positive airway pressure in controlling central sleep apnea and improving symptoms. Only a small proportion of these patients had comorbid heart failure. Early treatment with adaptive servo ventilation may improve long-term adherence to therapy. These findings highlight the utility of adaptive servo ventilation in the management of central sleep apnea.