1
|
Tange S, Saito T, Nakai Y, Hamada T, Watanabe Y, Takahara N, Fujishiro M. Severe bleeding associated with lumen-apposing metal stent placement for walled-off necrosis: bloody memory in WONderland. Endoscopy 2024; 56:E552-E553. [PMID: 38917979 PMCID: PMC11199079 DOI: 10.1055/a-2335-6707] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/27/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Shuichi Tange
- Department of Gastroenterology, The University of Tokyo, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tomotaka Saito
- Department of Gastroenterology, The University of Tokyo, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yousuke Nakai
- Department of Gastroenterology, The University of Tokyo, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Endoscopy and Endoscopic Surgery, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Hamada
- Department of Gastroenterology, The University of Tokyo, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yusuke Watanabe
- Department of Radiology, The University of Tokyo, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naminatsu Takahara
- Department of Gastroenterology, The University of Tokyo, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mitsuhiro Fujishiro
- Department of Gastroenterology, The University of Tokyo, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Capurso G, Rizzo GEM, Coluccio C, Crinò SF, Cucchetti A, Facciorusso A, Hassan C, Amato A, Auriemma F, Bertani H, Binda C, Cipolletta F, Forti E, Fugazza A, Lisotti A, Maida M, Sinagra E, Sbrancia M, Spadaccini M, Tacelli M, Vanella G, Anderloni A, Fabbri C, Tarantino I. The i-EUS consensus on the management of pancreatic fluid collections - Part 1. Dig Liver Dis 2024; 56:1663-1674. [PMID: 39048418 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2024.06.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2024] [Revised: 06/26/2024] [Accepted: 06/28/2024] [Indexed: 07/27/2024]
Abstract
Pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs), including pancreatic pseudocysts (PPs) and walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WON), are common complications of pancreatitis and pancreatic surgery. Historically, the treatment of these conditions has relied on surgical and radiological approaches; however, it has later shifted toward an endoscopy-based approach. With the development of dedicated lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS), interventional Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS)-guided procedures have become the standard approach for PFC drainage. However, there is still limited consensus on several aspects of the multidisciplinary management of PFCs. The interventional endoscopy and ultrasound (i-EUS) group is an Italian network of clinicians and scientists with special interest in biliopancreatic interventional endoscopy, especially interventional EUS. This manuscript describes the first part of the results of a consensus conference organized by i-EUS with the aim of providing evidence-based guidance on aspects such as indications for treating PFCs, the timing of intervention, and different technical strategies for managing patients with PFCs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriele Capurso
- Pancreatico/Biliary Endoscopy & Endosonography Division, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center San Raffaele Scientific Institut, Milan, Italy
| | - Giacomo Emanuele Maria Rizzo
- Endoscopy Service, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services, IRCCS - ISMETT, Palermo, Italy; Department of Precision Medicine in Medical, Surgical and Critical Care (Me.Pre.C.C.), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Chiara Coluccio
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Forlì-Cesena Hospitals, AUSL Romagna, Forlì-Cesena, Italy.
| | - Stefano Francesco Crinò
- Diagnostic and Interventional Endoscopy of Pancreas, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, 37134 Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Cucchetti
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences - DIMEC, Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Cesare Hassan
- Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Pieve Emanuele, Italy; Humanitas Clinical and Research Center -IRCCS-, Endoscopy Unit, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Arnaldo Amato
- Digestive Endoscopy and Gastroenterology Department, ASST Lecco, Italy
| | - Francesco Auriemma
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza, Italy
| | - Helga Bertani
- Gastroenterologia ed Endoscopia Digestiva Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Cecilia Binda
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Forlì-Cesena Hospitals, AUSL Romagna, Forlì-Cesena, Italy
| | - Fabio Cipolletta
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ospedale del Mare, ASL NA1 Centro, Naples, Italy
| | - Edoardo Forti
- Digestive and Interventional Endoscopy Unit, ASST Niguarda Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Fugazza
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center -IRCCS-, Endoscopy Unit, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Andrea Lisotti
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, University of Bologna, Imola, Italy
| | - Marcello Maida
- Gastroenterology Unit, Umberto I Hospital - Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Enna 'Kore', Enna, Italy
| | - Emanuele Sinagra
- Gastroenterology & Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Istituto G. Giglio, Cefalù, Italy
| | - Monica Sbrancia
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Forlì-Cesena Hospitals, AUSL Romagna, Forlì-Cesena, Italy
| | - Marco Spadaccini
- Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Pieve Emanuele, Italy
| | - Matteo Tacelli
- Pancreato-biliary Endoscopy and EUS Division, San Raffaele Scientific Institute IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Vanella
- Pancreato-biliary Endoscopy and EUS Division, San Raffaele Scientific Institute IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Anderloni
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Foundation Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Carlo Fabbri
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Forlì-Cesena Hospitals, AUSL Romagna, Forlì-Cesena, Italy
| | - Ilaria Tarantino
- Endoscopy Service, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services, IRCCS - ISMETT, Palermo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
González-Haba Ruiz M, Betés Ibáñez MT, Martínez Moreno B, Repiso Ortega A, de la Serna Higuera C, Iglesias García J, Sendino García O, Moris Felgueroso M, Agudo Castillo B, Esteban López-Jamar JM, Lindo Ricce MD, Soria San Teodoro MT, Moya Valverde E, Muñoz López D, Uribarri González L, Sevilla Ribota S, Lariño Noia J, Pérez Miranda M, Aparicio Tormo JR, Vila Costas JJ, Vázquez Sequeiros E, Subtil Íñigo JC, Pérez-Cuadrado-Robles E, Sánchez Yagüe A, Núñez Otero JA, Foruny Olcina JR. Endoscopic management of pancreatic collections. Endoscopic Ultrasound Group, Spanish Society of Digestive Endoscopy (GSEED-USE) Clinical Guidelines. REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ENFERMEDADES DIGESTIVAS 2024; 116:423-437. [PMID: 38305682 DOI: 10.17235/reed.2024.10276/2024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2024]
Abstract
Acute pancreatitis is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. It can develop complications such as fluid collections and necrosis. Infection of necrosis occurs in about 20-40 % of patients with severe acute pancreatitis, and is associated with organ failure and worse prognosis. In the past few years the treatment of pancreatic collections has shifted from open surgery to minimally invasive techniques such as endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage. These guidelines from a selection of experts among the Endoscopic Ultrasound Group, Spanish Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (GSEED-USE) are intended to provide advice on the management of pancreatic collections based on a thorough review of the available scientific evidence. It also reflects the experience and clinical practice of the authors, who are advanced endoscopists or clinical pancreatologists with extensive experience in managing patients with acute pancreatitis.
Collapse
|
4
|
Brown NG, Sethi A. Endoscopic Drainage of Pancreatic Fluid Collections. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2024; 34:553-575. [PMID: 38796299 DOI: 10.1016/j.giec.2024.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/28/2024]
Abstract
Pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) are commonly encountered complications of acute and chronic pancreatitis. With the advancement of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) techniques and devices, EUS-directed transmural drainage of symptomatic or infected PFCs has become the standard of care. Traditionally, plastic stents have been used for drainage, although lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMSs) are now favored by most endoscopists due to ease of use and reduced procedure time. While safety has been repeatedly demonstrated, follow-up care for these patients is critical as delayed adverse events of indwelling drains are known to occur.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas G Brown
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, NewYork-Presbyterian/Brooklyn Methodist Hospital, 515 6th Street, Concourse, Brooklyn, NY 11215, USA; Weill Cornell, 1283 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA; Division of Digestive and Liver Disease, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 630 West 168th Street, P&S 3-401, New York, NY 10032, USA.
| | - Amrita Sethi
- Division of Digestive and Liver Disease, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 630 West 168th Street, P&S 3-401, New York, NY 10032, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Nakai Y, Saito T, Hamada T, Sato T, Hakuta R, Takahara N, Isayama H, Yasuda I, Fujishiro M. Controversies in endoscopic ultrasonography-guided management of walled-off necrosis. Dig Endosc 2024. [PMID: 38895801 DOI: 10.1111/den.14869] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2024] [Accepted: 05/26/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024]
Abstract
Walled-off necrosis (WON) develops as local complications after acute necrotizing pancreatitis. Although less invasive interventions such as endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided drainage and endoscopic necrosectomy are selected over surgical interventions, delayed and step-up interventions are still preferred to avoid procedure-related adverse events. However, there is a controversy about the appropriate timing of drainage and subsequent necrosectomy. The advent of large-caliber lumen-apposing metal stents has also brought about potential advantages of proactive interventions, which still needs investigation in future trials. When step-up interventions of necrosectomy and additional drainage are necessary, a structured or protocoled approach for WON has been reported to improve safety and effectiveness of endoscopic and/or percutaneous treatment, but has not been standardized yet. Finally, long-term outcomes such as recurrence of WON, pancreatic endocrine, and exocrine function are increasingly investigated in association with disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome. In this review we discuss current evidence and controversy on EUS-guided management of WON.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yousuke Nakai
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Internal Medicine, Institute of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tomotaka Saito
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Hamada
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Sato
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ryunosuke Hakuta
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Internal Medicine, Institute of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naminatsu Takahara
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Isayama
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ichiro Yasuda
- Third Department of Internal Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan
| | - Mitsuhiro Fujishiro
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Singh AK, Manrai M, Kochhar R. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic fluid collection drainage: Where are we? World J Gastrointest Endosc 2024; 16:273-281. [PMID: 38946852 PMCID: PMC11212513 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v16.i6.273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2024] [Revised: 04/19/2024] [Accepted: 05/27/2024] [Indexed: 06/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) result from injury to the pancreas from acute or chronic pancreatitis, surgery, or trauma. Management of these collections has evolved over the last 2 decades. The choice of interventions includes percutaneous, endoscopic, minimally invasive surgery, or a combined approach. Endoscopic drainage is the drainage of PFCs by creating an artificial communication between the collection and gastrointestinal lumen that is maintained by placing a stent across the fistulous tract. In this editorial, we endeavored to update the current status of endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of PFCs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anupam Kumar Singh
- Department of Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh 160012, India
| | - Manish Manrai
- Department of Gastroenterology, Command Hospital, Lucknow 226002, India
| | - Rakesh Kochhar
- Department of Gastroenterology, Paras Hospital, Panchkula 134109, India
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Shah J, Fernandez Y Viesca M, Jagodzinski R, Arvanitakis M. Infected pancreatic necrosis-Current trends in management. Indian J Gastroenterol 2024; 43:578-591. [PMID: 38625518 DOI: 10.1007/s12664-023-01506-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2023] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 04/17/2024]
Abstract
Acute necrotizing pancreatitis is a common gastrointestinal disease requiring hospitalization and multiple interventions resulting in higher morbidity and mortality. Development of infection in such necrotic tissue is one of the sentinel events in natural history of necrotizing pancreatitis. Infected necrosis develops in around 1/3rd of patients with necrotizing pancreatitis resulting in higher mortality. So, timely diagnosis of infected necrosis using clinical, laboratory and radiological parameters is of utmost importance. Though initial conservative management with antibiotics and organ support system is effective in some patients, a majority of patients still requires drainage of the collection by various modalities. Mode of drainage of infected pancreatic necrosis depends on various factors such as the clinical status of the patient, location and characteristics of collection and availability of the expertise and includes endoscopic, percutaneous and minimally invasive or open surgical approaches. Endoscopic drainage has proved to be a game changer in the management of infected pancreatic necrosis in the last decade with rapid evolution in procedure techniques, development of novel metal stent and dedicated necrosectomy devices for better clinical outcome. Despite widespread adoption of endoscopic transluminal drainage of pancreatic necrosis with excellent clinical outcomes, peripheral collections are still not amenable for endoscopic drainage and in such scenario, the role of percutaneous catheter drainage or minimally invasive surgical necrosectomy cannot be understated. In a nutshell, the management of patients with infected pancreatic necrosis involves a multi-disciplinary team including a gastroenterologist, an intensivist, an interventional radiologist and a surgeon for optimum clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jimil Shah
- Department of Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160 012, India
| | - Michael Fernandez Y Viesca
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology, and Digestive Oncology, Erasme University Hospital, HUB, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Marianna Arvanitakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology, and Digestive Oncology, Erasme University Hospital, HUB, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wu S, Dou X, Li N, Zhu H, Wang L, Liu M, Yu C. Postponed endoscopic necrosectomy results in a lower rate of additional intervention for infected walled-off necrosis. Sci Rep 2024; 14:11610. [PMID: 38773218 PMCID: PMC11109209 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-61675-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2024] [Accepted: 05/08/2024] [Indexed: 05/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Although endoscopic necrosectomy (EN) is more frequently used to manage walled-off necrosis (WON), there is still debate over how much time should pass between the initial stent placement and the first necrosectomy. This study aims to determine the effect of performing EN within different timings after placing the initial stent on clinical outcomes for WON. A retrospective study on infected WON patients compared an early necrosectomy within one week after the initial stent placement with a necrosectomy that was postponed after a week. The primary outcomes compared the rate of clinical success and the need for additional intervention after EN to achieve WON resolution. 77 patients were divided into early and postponed necrosectomy groups. The complete resolution of WON within six months of follow-up was attained in 73.7% and 74.3% of patients in both the early and postponed groups. The early group tended to a greater need for additional intervention after EN (26.8% early necrosectomy vs. 8.3% postponed necrosectomy, P = 0.036). Our study does not demonstrate that early necrosectomy is superior to postponed necrosectomy in terms of clinical success rate, total count of necrosectomy procedures, procedure-related complications, length of hospitalization and prognosis. Conversely, patients in the postponed group received fewer additional interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Songting Wu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Xiaotan Dou
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Na Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Hao Zhu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Lei Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Mingdong Liu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Chenggong Yu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Saito T, Omoto S, Takenaka M, Tsujimae M, Masuda A, Sato T, Hamada T, Ota S, Shiomi H, Takahashi S, Fujisawa T, Nakagawa K, Matsubara S, Uemura S, Iwashita T, Yoshida K, Maruta A, Okuno M, Iwata K, Hayashi N, Mukai T, Isayama H, Yasuda I, Nakai Y. Risk factors for adverse outcomes at various phases of endoscopic ultrasound-guided treatment of pancreatic fluid collections: Data from a multi-institutional consortium. Dig Endosc 2024; 36:600-614. [PMID: 37702186 DOI: 10.1111/den.14683] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 09/10/2023] [Indexed: 09/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES No comprehensive study has examined short- and long-term adverse outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided treatment of pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) including walled-off necrosis (WON) and pseudocysts. METHODS In a multi-institutional cohort of 357 patients receiving EUS-guided treatment of PFCs (228 with WON and 129 with pseudocysts), we examined PFC type-specific risk factors for procedure-related adverse events (AEs), clinical failure, and recurrence. Odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed using the logistic and Cox regression models, respectively, adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS Adverse events were observed predominantly in WON, and risk factors were WON extension to the pelvis (OR 2.49; 95% CI 1.00-6.19) and endoscopic necrosectomy (OR 5.15; 95% CI 1.61-16.5). Risk factors for clinical failure in WON treatment included higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (OR for ≥3 vs. ≤2, 2.58; 95% CI 1.05-6.35), extension to the pelvis (OR 3.63; 95% CI 1.57-8.43), nonuse of a lumen-apposing metal stent (OR 2.88; 95% CI 1.10-7.54), and percutaneous drainage (OR 3.73; 95% CI 1.27-10.9). Patients with pseudocysts extending to the paracolic gutter and the need for more than two endoscopic/percutaneous procedures had ORs for clinical failure of 5.28 (95% CI 1.10-25.3) and 5.52 (95% CI 1.61-18.9), respectively. Pseudocysts requiring the multigateway approach were associated with a high risk of recurrence (HR 4.00; 95% CI 1.11-11.6). CONCLUSION The adverse outcomes at various phases of EUS-guided PFC treatment may be predictable based on clinical parameters. Further research is warranted to optimize treatment strategies for high-risk patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomotaka Saito
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shunsuke Omoto
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Mamoru Takenaka
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Masahiro Tsujimae
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Atsuhiro Masuda
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Sato
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Hamada
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shogo Ota
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Hyogo Medical University, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Shiomi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Hyogo Medical University, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Sho Takahashi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Toshio Fujisawa
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Keito Nakagawa
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan
| | - Saburo Matsubara
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan
| | - Shinya Uemura
- First Department of Internal Medicine, Gifu University Hospital, Gifu, Japan
| | - Takuji Iwashita
- First Department of Internal Medicine, Gifu University Hospital, Gifu, Japan
| | - Kensaku Yoshida
- Department of Gastroenterology, Gifu Prefectural General Medical Center, Gifu, Japan
| | - Akinori Maruta
- Department of Gastroenterology, Gifu Prefectural General Medical Center, Gifu, Japan
| | - Mitsuru Okuno
- Department of Gastroenterology, Gifu Municipal Hospital, Gifu, Japan
| | - Keisuke Iwata
- Department of Gastroenterology, Gifu Municipal Hospital, Gifu, Japan
| | - Nobuhiko Hayashi
- Third Department of Internal Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Mukai
- Department of Gastroenterological Endoscopy, Kanazawa Medical University, Ishikawa, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Isayama
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ichiro Yasuda
- Third Department of Internal Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan
| | - Yousuke Nakai
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Endoscopy and Endoscopic Surgery, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Binda C, Fabbri S, Perini B, Boschetti M, Coluccio C, Giuffrida P, Gibiino G, Petraroli C, Fabbri C. Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Drainage of Pancreatic Fluid Collections: Not All Queries Are Already Solved. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2024; 60:333. [PMID: 38399620 PMCID: PMC10890047 DOI: 10.3390/medicina60020333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2023] [Revised: 02/07/2024] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024]
Abstract
Pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) are well-known complications of acute pancreatitis. The overinfection of these collections leads to a worsening of the prognosis with an increase in the morbidity and mortality rate. The primary strategy for managing infected pancreatic necrosis (IPN) or symptomatic PFCs is a minimally invasive step-up approach, with endosonography-guided (EUS-guided) transmural drainage and debridement as the preferred and less invasive method. Different stents are available to drain PFCs: self-expandable metal stents (SEMSs), double pigtail stents (DPPSs), or lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMSs). In particular, LAMSs are useful when direct endoscopic necrosectomy is needed, as they allow easy access to the necrotic cavity; however, the rate of adverse events is not negligible, and to date, the superiority over DPPSs is still debated. Moreover, the timing for necrosectomy, the drainage technique, and the concurrent medical management are still debated. In this review, we focus attention on indications, timing, techniques, complications, and particularly on aspects that remain under debate concerning the EUS-guided drainage of PFCs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cecilia Binda
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, AUSL Romagna, Forlì-Cesena Hospitals, 47121 Forlì, Italy
| | - Stefano Fabbri
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, AUSL Romagna, Forlì-Cesena Hospitals, 47121 Forlì, Italy
| | - Barbara Perini
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Azienda ULSS 5, 45100 Rovigo, Italy
| | - Martina Boschetti
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy
| | - Chiara Coluccio
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, AUSL Romagna, Forlì-Cesena Hospitals, 47121 Forlì, Italy
| | - Paolo Giuffrida
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, AUSL Romagna, Forlì-Cesena Hospitals, 47121 Forlì, Italy
| | - Giulia Gibiino
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, AUSL Romagna, Forlì-Cesena Hospitals, 47121 Forlì, Italy
| | - Chiara Petraroli
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, AUSL Romagna, Forlì-Cesena Hospitals, 47121 Forlì, Italy
| | - Carlo Fabbri
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, AUSL Romagna, Forlì-Cesena Hospitals, 47121 Forlì, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Troncone E, Amendola R, Gadaleta F, De Cristofaro E, Neri B, De Vico P, Paoluzi OA, Monteleone G, Anderloni A, Del Vecchio Blanco G. Indications, Techniques and Future Perspectives of Walled-off Necrosis Management. Diagnostics (Basel) 2024; 14:381. [PMID: 38396420 PMCID: PMC10888331 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14040381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2024] [Revised: 02/03/2024] [Accepted: 02/06/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Necrotizing pancreatitis is a complex clinical condition burdened with significant morbidity and mortality. In recent years, the huge progress of interventional endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has allowed a shift in the management of pancreatic necrotic collections from surgical/percutaneous approaches to mini-invasive endoscopic internal drainage and debridement procedures. The development of lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMSs), devices specifically dedicated to transmural EUS interventions, further prompted the diffusion of such techniques. Several studies have reported excellent outcomes of endoscopic interventions, in terms of technical success, clinical efficacy and safety compared to surgical interventions, and thus endoscopic drainage of walled-off necrosis (WON) has become a fundamental tool for the management of such conditions. Despite these advancements, some critical unresolved issues remain. Endoscopic therapeutic approaches to WON are still heterogeneous among different centers and experts. A standardized protocol on indication, timing and technique of endoscopic necrosectomy is still lacking, and experts often adopt a strategy based on personal experience more than robust data from well-conducted studies. In this review, we will summarize the available evidence on endoscopic management of WON and will discuss some unanswered questions in this rapidly evolving field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edoardo Troncone
- Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, 00133 Rome, Italy; (E.T.)
| | - Rosa Amendola
- Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, 00133 Rome, Italy; (E.T.)
| | - Fabio Gadaleta
- Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, 00133 Rome, Italy; (E.T.)
| | - Elena De Cristofaro
- Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, 00133 Rome, Italy; (E.T.)
| | - Benedetto Neri
- Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, 00133 Rome, Italy; (E.T.)
| | - Pasquale De Vico
- Department of Anaesthesia, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, 00133 Rome, Italy
| | | | - Giovanni Monteleone
- Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, 00133 Rome, Italy; (E.T.)
| | - Andrea Anderloni
- Endoscopy Unit, First Department of Internal Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, University of Pavia, 27029 Pavia, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hamada T, Tsujimae M, Nakai Y. Beyond One-Size-Fits-All: Size-Oriented Criteria for the Step-Up Treatment of Walled-Off Pancreatic Necrosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 22:433-435. [PMID: 37302450 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2023.05.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Revised: 05/19/2023] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Tsuyoshi Hamada
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masahiro Tsujimae
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Yousuke Nakai
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Endoscopy and Endoscopic Surgery, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Gunjan D, Mahapatra SJ, Garg PK. Upfront necrosectomy for infected necrotising pancreatitis: a promising strategy? Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 9:2-3. [PMID: 37980920 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(23)00369-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2023] [Revised: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 11/21/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Deepak Gunjan
- Department of Gastroenterology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India
| | | | - Pramod Kumar Garg
- Department of Gastroenterology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bang JY, Lakhtakia S, Thakkar S, Buxbaum JL, Waxman I, Sutton B, Memon SF, Singh S, Basha J, Singh A, Navaneethan U, Hawes RH, Wilcox CM, Varadarajulu S. Upfront endoscopic necrosectomy or step-up endoscopic approach for infected necrotising pancreatitis (DESTIN): a single-blinded, multicentre, randomised trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 9:22-33. [PMID: 37980922 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(23)00331-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Revised: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 09/27/2023] [Indexed: 11/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although the preferred management approach for patients with infected necrotising pancreatitis is endoscopic transluminal stenting followed by endoscopic necrosectomy as step-up treatment if there is no clinical improvement, the optimal timing of necrosectomy is unclear. Therefore, we aimed to compare outcomes between performing upfront necrosectomy at the index intervention versus as a step-up measure in patients with infected necrotising pancreatitis. METHODS This single-blinded, multicentre, randomised trial (DESTIN) was done at six tertiary care hospitals (five hospitals in the USA and one hospital in India). We enrolled patients (aged ≥18 years) with confirmed or suspected infected necrotising pancreatitis with a necrosis extent of at least 33% who were amenable to endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage. By use of computer-generated permuted block randomisation (block size four), eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either upfront endoscopic necrosectomy or endoscopic step-up treatment. Endoscopists were not masked to treatment allocation, but participants, research coordinators, and the statistician were. Lumen-apposing metal stents (20 mm diameter; 10 mm saddle length) were used for drainage in both groups. In the upfront group, direct necrosectomy was performed immediately after stenting in the same treatment session. In the step-up group, direct necrosectomy or additional drainage was done at a subsequent treatment session if there was no clinical improvement (resolution of any criteria of systemic inflammatory response syndrome or sepsis or one or more organ failure and at least a 25% percentage decrease in necrotic collection size) 72 h after stenting. The primary outcome was the number of reinterventions per patient to achieve treatment success from index intervention to 6 months' follow-up, which was defined as symptom relief in conjunction with disease resolution on CT. Reinterventions included any endoscopic or radiological procedures performed for necrosectomy or additional drainage after the index intervention, excluding the follow-up procedure at 4 weeks for stent removal. All endpoints and safety were analysed by intention-to-treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05043415 and NCT04113499, and recruitment and follow-up have been completed. FINDINGS Between Nov 27, 2019, and Oct 26, 2022, 183 patients were assessed for eligibility and 70 patients (24 [34%] women and 46 [66%] men) were randomly assigned to receive upfront necrosectomy (n=37) or step-up treatment (n=33) and included in the intention-to-treat population. At the time of index intervention, seven (10%) of 70 patients had organ failure and 64 (91%) patients had walled-off necrosis. The median number of reinterventions was significantly lower for upfront necrosectomy (1 [IQR 0 to 1] than for the step-up approach (2 [1 to 4], difference -1 [95% CI -2 to 0]; p=0·0027). Mortality did not differ between groups (zero patients in the upfront necrosectomy group vs two [6%] in the step-up group, difference -6·1 percentage points [95% CI -16·5 to 4·5]; p=0·22), nor did overall disease-related adverse events (12 [32%] patients in the upfront necrosectomy group vs 16 [48%] patients in the step-up group, difference -16·1 percentage points [-37·4 to 7·0]; p=0·17), nor procedure-related adverse events (four [11%] patients in the upfront necrosectomy group vs eight [24%] patients in the step-up group, difference -13·4 percentage points [-30·8 to 5·0]; p=0·14). INTERPRETATION In stabilised patients with infected necrotising pancreatitis and fully encapsulated collections, an approach incorporating upfront necrosectomy at the index intervention rather than as a step-up measure could safely reduce the number of reinterventions required to achieve treatment success. FUNDING None.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ji Young Bang
- Digestive Health Institute, Orlando Health, Orlando, FL, USA
| | | | - Shyam Thakkar
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA
| | - James L Buxbaum
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Irving Waxman
- Division of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, Rush University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Bryce Sutton
- Digestive Health Institute, Orlando Health, Orlando, FL, USA
| | - Sana F Memon
- Asian Institute of Gastroenterology Hospitals, Hyderabad, India
| | - Shailendra Singh
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA
| | - Jahangeer Basha
- Asian Institute of Gastroenterology Hospitals, Hyderabad, India
| | - Ajay Singh
- Division of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, Rush University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Robert H Hawes
- Digestive Health Institute, Orlando Health, Orlando, FL, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Nakai Y, Hamada T, Saito T, Shiomi H, Maruta A, Iwashita T, Iwata K, Takenaka M, Masuda A, Matsubara S, Sato T, Mukai T, Yasuda I, Isayama H. Time to think prime times for treatment of necrotizing pancreatitis: Pendulum conundrum. Dig Endosc 2023; 35:700-710. [PMID: 37209365 DOI: 10.1111/den.14598] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2023] [Accepted: 05/16/2023] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Abstract
Pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) typically develop as local complications of acute pancreatitis and complicate the clinical course of patients with acute pancreatitis and potentially fatal clinical outcomes. Interventions are required in cases of symptomatic walled-off necrosis (WON) (matured PFCs with necrosis) and pancreatic pseudocysts (matured PFCs without necrosis). In the management of necrotizing pancreatitis and WON, endoscopic ultrasound-guided transluminal drainage combined with on-demand endoscopic necrosectomy (i.e. the step-up approach) is increasingly used as a less invasive treatment modality compared with a surgical or percutaneous approach. Through the substantial research efforts and development of specific devices and stents (e.g. lumen-apposing metal stents), endoscopic techniques of PFC management have been standardized to some extent. However, there has been no consensus about timing of carrying out each treatment step; for instance, it is uncertain when direct endoscopic necrosectomy should be initiated and finished and when a plastic or metal stent should be removed following clinical treatment success. Despite emerging evidence for the effectiveness of noninterventional supportive treatment (e.g. antibiotics, nutritional support, irrigation of the cavity), there has been only limited data on the timing of starting and stopping the treatment. Large studies are required to optimize the timing of those treatment options and improve clinical outcomes of patients with PFCs. In this review, we summarize the current available evidence on the indications and timing of interventional and supportive treatment modalities for this patient population and discussed clinical unmet needs that should be addressed in future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yousuke Nakai
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Endoscopy and Endoscopic Surgery, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Hamada
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tomotaka Saito
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Shiomi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Hyogo Medical University, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Akinori Maruta
- Department of Gastroenterology, Gifu Prefectural General Medical Center, Gifu, Japan
| | - Takuji Iwashita
- First Department of Internal Medicine, Gifu University Hospital, Gifu, Japan
| | - Keisuke Iwata
- Department of Gastroenterology, Gifu Municipal Hospital, Gifu, Japan
| | - Mamoru Takenaka
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Atsuhiro Masuda
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Saburo Matsubara
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Sato
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Mukai
- Department of Gastroenterological Endoscopy, Kanazawa Medical University, Ishikawa, Japan
| | - Ichiro Yasuda
- Third Department of Internal Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Isayama
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Rana SS. Endoscopic treatment of pancreatic necrosis: Still searching for perfection! J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 38:1252-1258. [PMID: 37309053 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.16262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Accepted: 06/01/2023] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Over last few years, there has been a paradigm shift in the management of infected pancreatic necrosis with endoscopic and minimally invasive "step-up" management approach replacing open surgical necrosectomy. Because of being associated with reduced occurrence of new onset multi-organ failure, external pancreatic fistulae, shorter hospital stay, lower costs, and better quality of life compared with minimally invasive surgical approach, endoscopic "step-up" management approach is the preferred intervention for endoscopically accessible pancreatic necrotic collections at expert centers with endoscopic expertise. Development of lumen apposing metal stents and improvised accessories for interventional endoscopic ultrasound has revolutionized the endoscopic management of pancreatic necrosis making it more effective and safer. Despite these promising developments, endoscopic transluminal necrosectomy (ETN) remains the Achilles heel. Lack of dedicated endoscopic accessories, poor endoscopic visualization within the necrotic cavity, limited diameter of the instrument channel of the endoscope that is a significant impediment to remove large amount of necrotic material, and uncertain ability to avoid vessels and vital structures in the necrotic cavity are important limitations during endoscopic necrosectomy. Recent devices and solutions including use of cap assisted necrosectomy, over the scope grasper and powered endoscopic debridement device are welcome steps in our pursuit for an ideal, safer, and efficacious ETN device. This review will discuss recent advances as well as challenges in the endoscopic management of pancreatic necrosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Surinder Singh Rana
- Department of Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Seicean A, Pojoga C, Rednic V, Hagiu C, Seicean R. Endoscopic ultrasound drainage of pancreatic fluid collections: do we know enough about the best approach? Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2023; 16:17562848231180047. [PMID: 37485492 PMCID: PMC10357067 DOI: 10.1177/17562848231180047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 05/18/2023] [Indexed: 07/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic fluid collection often occurs as a local complication of acute pancreatitis, and drainage is indicated in symptomatic patients. The drainage may be surgical, percutaneous, or endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guided. In symptomatic collections older than 4 weeks and localized in the upper abdomen, EUS-guided drainage is the first choice of treatment. Lumen-apposing metal stents are useful in cases of walled-off necrosis, facilitating access to the cavity; however, they do not reduce the number of necrosectomy sessions required. In most pancreatic pseudocysts requiring drainage, plastic stents remain the first choice of treatment. This review aimed to summarize the principles and techniques of step-up therapy of pancreatic fluid collections, including preprocedural and postprocedural assessment and practical approaches of drainage and necrosectomy, making available evidence more accessible to endoscopists aiming to train for this procedure. Successful and safe EUS drainage connotes early recognition and treatment of complications and the presence of a multidisciplinary team for optimal patient management. However, the best time for necrosectomy, modality of drainage method (lumen-apposing metal stents or plastic stents), and duration of antibiotherapy are still under evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrada Seicean
- ‘Iuliu Hațieganu’ University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
- Department of Gastroenterology, Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology ‘Prof. Dr. Octavian Fodor’, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | | | - Voicu Rednic
- Department of Gastroenterology, Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology ‘Prof. Dr. Octavian Fodor’, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Claudia Hagiu
- ‘Iuliu Hațieganu’ University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
- Department of Gastroenterology, Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology ‘Prof. Dr. Octavian Fodor’, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Radu Seicean
- First Department of Surgery, ‘Iuliu Hațieganu’ University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Karstensen JG, Novovic S, Hansen EF, Jensen AB, Jorgensen HL, Lauritsen ML, Werge MP, Schmidt PN. EUS-guided drainage of large walled-off pancreatic necroses using plastic versus lumen-apposing metal stents: a single-centre randomised controlled trial. Gut 2023; 72:1167-1173. [PMID: 36446550 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2022-328225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2022] [Accepted: 11/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In treating pancreatic walled-off necrosis (WON), lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) have not proven superior to the traditional double pigtail technique (DPT). Among patients with large WON (>15 cm) and their associated substantial risk of treatment failure, the increased drainage capacity of a novel 20-mm LAMS might improve clinical outcomes. Hence, we conducted a study comparing the DPT and 20-mm LAMS in patients with large WON. DESIGN A single-centre, open-label, randomised, controlled superiority trial using an endoscopic step-up approach in patients with WON exceeding 15 cm in size. The primary endpoint was the number of necrosectomies needed to achieve clinical success (clinical and CT resolution), while the secondary endpoints included technical success, adverse events, length of stay and mortality. RESULTS Twenty-two patients were included in the DPT group and 20 in the LAMS group, with no significant differences in patient characteristics. The median size of WON was 24.1 cm (P25-P75: 19.6-31.1). The technical success rates were 100% for DPT and 95% for LAMS (p=0.48), while clinical success rates were 95.5% and 94.7%, respectively (p=1.0). The mean number of necrosectomies was 2.2 for DPT and 3.2 for LAMS (p=0.42). Five patients (12%) developed procedure-related serious adverse events (DPT=4, LAMS=1, p=0.35). The median length of stay was 43 (P25-P75: 40-67) and 58 days (P25-P75: 40-86) in the DPT and LAMS groups (p=0.71), respectively, with an overall mortality of 4.8%. CONCLUSIONS For treating large WON, LAMS are not superior to DPT. The techniques are associated with comparable needs for necrosectomy and hospital stay, and no gross difference in adverse events. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT04057846.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Gásdal Karstensen
- Pancreatitis Centre East (PACE), Gastro Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital - Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Srdan Novovic
- Pancreatitis Centre East (PACE), Gastro Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital - Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Erik Feldager Hansen
- Pancreatitis Centre East (PACE), Gastro Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital - Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Annette Bojer Jensen
- Department of Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Henrik Lovendahl Jorgensen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Copenhagen University Hospital - Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Morten Laksafoss Lauritsen
- Pancreatitis Centre East (PACE), Gastro Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital - Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Mikkel Parsberg Werge
- Pancreatitis Centre East (PACE), Gastro Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital - Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Palle Nordblad Schmidt
- Pancreatitis Centre East (PACE), Gastro Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital - Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Sato T, Saito T, Takenaka M, Iwashita T, Shiomi H, Fujisawa T, Hayashi N, Iwata K, Maruta A, Mukai T, Masuda A, Matsubara S, Hamada T, Inoue T, Ohyama H, Kuwatani M, Kamada H, Hashimoto S, Shiratori T, Yamada R, Kogure H, Ogura T, Nakahara K, Doi S, Chinen K, Isayama H, Yasuda I, Nakai Y. WONDER-01: immediate necrosectomy vs. drainage-oriented step-up approach after endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of walled-off necrosis-study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Trials 2023; 24:352. [PMID: 37226252 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07377-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Accepted: 05/15/2023] [Indexed: 05/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND With the increasing popularity of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided transmural interventions, walled-off necrosis (WON) of the pancreas is increasingly managed via non-surgical endoscopic interventions. However, there has been an ongoing debate over the appropriate treatment strategy following the initial EUS-guided drainage. Direct endoscopic necrosectomy (DEN) removes intracavity necrotic tissue, potentially facilitating early resolution of the WON, but may associate with a high rate of adverse events. Given the increasing safety of DEN, we hypothesised that immediate DEN following EUS-guided drainage of WON might shorten the time to WON resolution compared to the drainage-oriented step-up approach. METHODS The WONDER-01 trial is a multicentre, open-label, superiority, randomised controlled trial, which will enrol WON patients aged ≥ 18 years requiring EUS-guided treatment in 23 centres in Japan. This trial plans to enrol 70 patients who will be randomised at a 1:1 ratio to receive either the immediate DEN or drainage-oriented step-up approach (35 patients per arm). In the immediate DEN group, DEN will be initiated during (or within 72 h of) the EUS-guided drainage session. In the step-up approach group, drainage-based step-up treatment with on-demand DEN will be considered after 72-96 h observation. The primary endpoint is time to clinical success, which is defined as a decrease in a WON size to ≤ 3 cm and an improvement of inflammatory markers (i.e. body temperature, white blood cell count, and C-reactive protein). Secondary endpoints include technical success, adverse events including mortality, and recurrence of the WON. DISCUSSION The WONDER-01 trial will investigate the efficacy and safety of immediate DEN compared to the step-up approach for WON patients receiving EUS-guided treatment. The findings will help us to establish new treatment standards for patients with symptomatic WON. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05451901, registered on 11 July 2022. UMIN000048310, registered on 7 July 2022. jRCT1032220055, registered on 1 May 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tatsuya Sato
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tomotaka Saito
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mamoru Takenaka
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takuji Iwashita
- First Department of Internal Medicine, Gifu University Hospital, Gifu, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Shiomi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Hyogo Medical University, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Toshio Fujisawa
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Nobuhiko Hayashi
- Third Department of Internal Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan
| | - Keisuke Iwata
- Department of Gastroenterology, Gifu Municipal Hospital, Gifu, Japan
| | - Akinori Maruta
- Department of Gastroenterology, Gifu Prefectural General Medical Center, Gifu, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Mukai
- Department of Gastroenterological Endoscopy, Kanazawa Medical University, Ishikawa, Japan
| | - Atsuhiro Masuda
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Saburo Matsubara
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Hamada
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tadahisa Inoue
- Department of Gastroenterology, Aichi Medical University, Aichi, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Ohyama
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| | - Masaki Kuwatani
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Hideki Kamada
- Department of Gastroenterology and Neurology, Kagawa University, Kagawa, Japan
| | - Shinichi Hashimoto
- Digestive and Life-Style Diseases, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medicine and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima, Japan
| | | | - Reiko Yamada
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mie University Hospital, Mie, Japan
| | - Hirofumi Kogure
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takeshi Ogura
- Endoscopy Center, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kazunari Nakahara
- Department of Gastroenterology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Shinpei Doi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Teikyo University Mizonokuchi Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Kenji Chinen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Yuuai Medical Center, Okinawa, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Isayama
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ichiro Yasuda
- Third Department of Internal Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan
| | - Yousuke Nakai
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
- Department of Endoscopy and Endoscopic Surgery, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Manrai M, Dawra S, Singh AK, Jha DK, Kochhar R. Controversies in the management of acute pancreatitis: An update. World J Clin Cases 2023; 11:2582-2603. [PMID: 37214572 PMCID: PMC10198120 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i12.2582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2022] [Revised: 01/22/2023] [Accepted: 03/29/2023] [Indexed: 04/25/2023] Open
Abstract
This review summarized the current controversies in the management of acute pancreatitis (AP). The controversies in management range from issues involving fluid resuscitation, nutrition, the role of antibiotics and antifungals, which analgesic to use, role of anticoagulation and intervention for complications in AP. The interventions vary from percutaneous drainage, endoscopy or surgery. Active research and emerging data are helping to formulate better guidelines. The available evidence favors crystalloids, although the choice and type of fluid resuscitation is an area of dynamic research. The nutrition aspect does not have controversy as of now as early enteral feeding is preferred most often than not. The empirical use of antibiotics and antifungals are gray zones, and more data is needed for conclusive guidelines. The choice of analgesic is being studied, and the recommendations are still evolving. The position of using anticoagulation is still awaiting consensus. The role of intervention is well established, although the modality is constantly changing and favoring endoscopy or percutaneous drainage rather than surgery. It is evident that more multicenter randomized controlled trials are required for establishing the standard of care in these crucial management issues of AP to improve the morbidity and mortality worldwide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manish Manrai
- Department of Internal Medicine, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune 411040, India
| | - Saurabh Dawra
- Department of Medicine and Gastroenterology, Command Hospital, Pune 411040, India
| | - Anupam K Singh
- Department of Gastroenterology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh 160012, India
| | - Daya Krishna Jha
- Department of Gastroenterology, Army Hospital (Research and Referral), New Delhi 11010, India
| | - Rakesh Kochhar
- Department of Gastroenterology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh 160012, India
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Pawa R, Dorrell R, Clark C, Russell G, Gilliam J, Pawa S. Delayed endoscopic necrosectomy improves hospital length of stay and reduces endoscopic interventions in patients with symptomatic walled‐off necrosis. DEN OPEN 2023; 3:e162. [PMID: 36090191 PMCID: PMC9453323 DOI: 10.1002/deo2.162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2022] [Revised: 07/23/2022] [Accepted: 08/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
Objectives Advancements in the endoscopic management of walled‐off necrosis using lumen apposing metal stents have improved outcomes over its surgical and percutaneous alternatives. The ideal procedural technique and timing of direct endoscopic necrosectomy (DEN) have yet to be clarified. Methods From November 2015 to June 2021, a retrospective comparative cohort analysis was performed comparing clinical outcomes for patients undergoing immediate DEN (iDEN) versus delayed DEN (dDEN). Subgroups were identified based on the quantification of necrosis. Wilcoxon two‐sample tests were used to compare continuous variables and Fisher's exact test was used to compare categorical variables. Results A total of 80 patients underwent DEN for management of walled‐off necrosis (iDEN = 43, dDEN = 37). Technical success was achieved in all patients. Clinical success was seen in 39 (91%) patients in the iDEN group and 34 (92%) in the dDEN group. Amongst iDEN patients, the mean number of necrosectomies was 2.5 (standard deviation [SD] 1.4) in comparison to 1.5 (SD 1.0) for dDEN (p‐value = 0.0011). The median index hospital length of stay was longer with iDEN than dDEN (7.5 days vs. 3.0 days respectively, p‐value = 0.010). Subgroup analysis was performed based on the percentage of necrosis (<25% vs. >25% necrosis). iDEN was associated with more necrosectomies than dDEN regardless of the percentage of necrosis (p = 0.017 and 0.0067, respectively). Conclusion Patients undergoing dDEN had a shorter index hospital stay and fewer necrosectomies than iDEN. The large diameter of lumen apposing metal stents permits adequate drainage allowing a less aggressive approach thereby improving clinical outcomes and avoiding unnecessary interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rishi Pawa
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology Wake Forest University School of Medicine Winston‐Salem USA
| | - Robert Dorrell
- Department of Medicine Wake Forest University School of Medicine Winston‐Salem USA
| | - Clancy Clark
- Department of General Surgery Wake Forest University School of Medicine Winston‐Salem USA
| | - Greg Russell
- Department of Biostatistics and Data Science Wake Forest University School of Medicine Winston‐Salem USA
| | - John Gilliam
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology Wake Forest University School of Medicine Winston‐Salem USA
| | - Swati Pawa
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology Wake Forest University School of Medicine Winston‐Salem USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Pawa R, Dorrell R, Pawa S. Response to “The second shot to walled‐off necrosis: The sooner the better versus sooner or later”. DEN OPEN 2023; 3:e187. [DOI: 10.1002/deo2.187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2022] [Revised: 11/02/2022] [Accepted: 11/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Rishi Pawa
- Department of MedicineSection of GastroenterologyWake Forest University School of Medicine Winston‐Salem North Carolina USA
| | - Robert Dorrell
- Department of MedicineSection of GastroenterologyWake Forest University School of Medicine Winston‐Salem North Carolina USA
| | - Swati Pawa
- Department of MedicineSection of GastroenterologyWake Forest University School of Medicine Winston‐Salem North Carolina USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Sato T, Yasuda I, Nakai Y. The second shot to walled‐off necrosis: The sooner the better versus sooner or later. DEN OPEN 2023; 3:e182. [PMID: 36348960 PMCID: PMC9630605 DOI: 10.1002/deo2.182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Accepted: 10/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Tatsuya Sato
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine The University of Tokyo Tokyo Japan
| | - Ichiro Yasuda
- Third Department of Internal Medicine University of Toyama Toyama Japan
| | - Yousuke Nakai
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine The University of Tokyo Tokyo Japan
- Department of Endoscopy and Endoscopic Surgery The University of Tokyo Hospital Tokyo Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Sameera S, Mohammad T, Liao K, Shahid H, Sarkar A, Tyberg A, Kahaleh M. Management of Pancreatic Fluid Collections: An Evidence-based Approach. J Clin Gastroenterol 2023; 57:346-361. [PMID: 36040932 DOI: 10.1097/mcg.0000000000001750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
Managing pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) remains a challenge for many clinicians. Recently, significant progress has been made in the therapy of PFCs, including improvements in technology and devices, as well as in the development of minimally invasive endoscopic techniques, many of which are proven less traumatic when compared with surgical options and more efficacious when compared with percutaneous techniques. This review will explore latest developments in the management of PFCs and how they incorporate into the current treatment algorithm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sohini Sameera
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Ramai D, Morgan AD, Gkolfakis P, Facciorusso A, Chandan S, Papaefthymiou A, Morris J, Arvanitakis M, Adler DG. Endoscopic management of pancreatic walled-off necrosis. Ann Gastroenterol 2023; 36:123-131. [PMID: 36864934 PMCID: PMC9932860 DOI: 10.20524/aog.2023.0772] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2022] [Accepted: 11/30/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic walled-off necrosis (WON) is a complication of severe pancreatitis. Endoscopic transmural drainage has been recognized as the first-line treatment for pancreatic fluid collections. Endoscopy offers a minimally invasive approach when compared to surgical drainage. Today, endoscopists may choose to use self-expanding metal stents, pigtail stents, or lumen-apposing metal stents to facilitate drainage of fluid collections. Current data suggest that all 3 approaches yield similar outcomes. It was previously thought that drainage should be performed 4 weeks from the initial event of pancreatitis, theoretically allowing the capsule to mature. However, current data show that both early (<4 weeks) and standard (≥4 weeks) endoscopic drainage are comparable. Herein, we provide an up-to-date state-of-the-art review of the indications, techniques, innovations, outcomes, and future perspectives following drainage of pancreatic WON.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daryl Ramai
- Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, USA (Daryl Ramai, John Morris)
| | | | - Paraskevas Gkolfakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology, and Digestive Oncology, CUB Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium (Paraskevas Gkolfakis, Marianna Arvanitakis)
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, Italy (Antonio Facciorusso)
| | - Saurabh Chandan
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, CHI Health Creighton University Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA (Saurabh Chandan)
| | - Apostolis Papaefthymiou
- Pancreaticobiliary Medicine Unit, University College London Hospitals (UCLH), London, UK (Apostolis Papaefthymiou)
| | - John Morris
- Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, USA (Daryl Ramai, John Morris)
| | - Marianna Arvanitakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology, and Digestive Oncology, CUB Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium (Paraskevas Gkolfakis, Marianna Arvanitakis)
| | - Douglas G. Adler
- Center for Advanced Therapeutic Endoscopy (CATE), Porter Adventist Hospital/PEAK Gastroenterology, Denver, Colorado, USA (Douglas G. Adler)
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Feasibility of Cholangioscopy Using Multibending Ultra-Slim Endoscope Through a Lumen-Apposing Metal Stent for Choledochoduodenostomy. Dig Dis Sci 2023; 68:268-273. [PMID: 35616805 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-022-07531-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2022] [Accepted: 04/19/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guided choledochoduodenostomy using a lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) allows access to the biliary system with a sufficiently large diameter stent. However, an appropriate endoscope for this purpose is required. We evaluated the feasibility of per-oral cholangioscopy (POC) using a multibending ultra-slim endoscope through a LAMS for EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy. METHODS Twelve patients who underwent EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy, followed by POC via a LAMS, were enrolled. POC was performed with an multibending ultra-slim endoscope. The primary outcome was technical success, defined as examination of both hepatic ducts and either the distal common bile duct or stricture site within 10 min. The types of intervention and adverse events were also assessed. RESULTS Technical success was achieved in all cases with the multibending ultra-slim endoscope. Narrow-band imaging endoscopy was performed in five cases (41.7%) and POC-guided targeted biopsy was performed in three cases (25.0%). Stone extraction during POC was performed in two patients (16.7%) and foreign body removal from the intrahepatic duct was performed in one patient. One patient underwent additional metal stent insertion under direct visualization. After POC, no stent migration or severe adverse events were seen in any case. CONCLUSIONS POC using a multibending ultra-slim endoscope for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes can be performed effectively and safely through a LAMS after EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy.
Collapse
|
27
|
Remizov SI, Andreev AV, Durleshter VM, Gabriel SA, Zasyadko OV. [Technological features of open and minimally invasive surgical treatment of local complications of purulent-necrotic pancreatitis]. Khirurgiia (Mosk) 2023:72-79. [PMID: 37379408 DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia202307172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/30/2023]
Abstract
There are various options for surgical treatment of purulent-necrotic pancreatitis with significant technological differences. Combining surgical methods other than traditional ones into a group of minimally invasive ones based on the principle of the absence of standard laparotomy is not entirely correct. The review presents modern methods of surgical treatment of acute pancreatitis, comparison of their technology regarding classical stages of surgical intervention and their classification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S I Remizov
- Regional Clinical Hospital No. 2, Krasnodar, Russia
- Kuban State Medical University, Krasnodar, Russia
| | - A V Andreev
- Regional Clinical Hospital No. 2, Krasnodar, Russia
- Kuban State Medical University, Krasnodar, Russia
| | - V M Durleshter
- Regional Clinical Hospital No. 2, Krasnodar, Russia
- Kuban State Medical University, Krasnodar, Russia
| | - S A Gabriel
- Regional Clinical Hospital No. 2, Krasnodar, Russia
- Kuban State Medical University, Krasnodar, Russia
| | - O V Zasyadko
- Kuban State Medical University, Krasnodar, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Drainage of Complex Walled-Off Pancreatic Fluid Collections in LAMS Era: A Multicenter Study. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 2022:9250370. [PMID: 36345379 PMCID: PMC9637039 DOI: 10.1155/2022/9250370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2022] [Accepted: 10/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) has been increasingly used for EUS-guided drainage of symptomatic walled-off pancreatic fluid collection (WOPFC) in recent years. Nevertheless, some WOPFCs may require additional drainage methods including another LAMS as a result of complexity of the lesions. This current study aimed to compare clinical parameters of patients with complex WOPFC requiring LAMS with additional methods (complex WOPFC: group A) versus single LAMS alone (noncomplex WOPFC; group B). METHOD Medical records of patients with complex (group A) versus noncomplex WOPFCs (group B) were reviewed and compared in three centers in Thailand and Malaysia, between January 2016 to December 2020. RESULT 31 patients with WOPFCs were recruited. 6 of 31 (19%) patients were in group A. Multivariate analysis showed that the maximal diameter of WOPFCs in group A was significantly larger than that of group B (18 ± 6 versus 13 ± 3 cm in diameter, respectively, p = 0.021). Solid component proportion was higher in group A versus B (35.8% versus 17.8%, respectively, p = 0.025). The prevalence of pancreatic duct leakage was significantly higher in group A (67% versus 20%, p = 0.23). The need of direct endoscopic necrosectomy (DEN) and the number of DEN sessions were higher in group A versus B (100% vs. 48%, p = 0.020 and 3.5 vs 0 p = 0.031, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Complex WOPFC had larger diameter of lesions, higher proportion of solid component, higher prevalence of pancreatic duct leakage, and higher number of DEN is required than group noncomplex lesions. Trial Registration. This trial is registered with TCTR20180223004.
Collapse
|
29
|
Jearth V, Rana SS. Endoscopic step up: When and how. Surg Open Sci 2022; 10:135-144. [PMID: 36193259 PMCID: PMC9526220 DOI: 10.1016/j.sopen.2022.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2022] [Revised: 05/16/2022] [Accepted: 09/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/01/2022] Open
Abstract
The management of (peri)pancreatic collections has undergone a paradigm shift from open surgical drainage to minimally invasive endoscopic, percutaneous, or surgical interventions. Minimally invasive interventions are associated with less morbidity and mortality compared to open necrosectomy. The (peri)pancreatic collections are currently treated with a “step-up approach” of an initial drainage procedure followed, if necessary, by a more invasive debridement. The step-up approach for management of (peri)pancreatic collections is mainly of two types, namely, surgical and endoscopic. Surgical step up includes initial image-guided percutaneous catheter drainage followed, if necessary, by minimally invasive video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement. Endoscopic step-up approach includes endoscopic transluminal drainage followed, if necessary by direct endoscopic necrosectomy. The development of endoscopic ultrasound and lumen apposing metal stents (LAMSs) has revolutionized the endoscopic management of (peri)pancreatic collections. Compared to surgical step-up approach, endoscopic step-up treatment approach has been reported to be associated with less new-onset organ failure, pancreatic fistula, enterocutaneous fistula, or perforation of visceral organ and shorter hospital/intensive care unit stay. This review will mainly focus on indications, techniques, timing, and recent advances related to endoscopic step-up approach in management of symptomatic(peri)pancreatic collections.
Collapse
|
30
|
Diagnostic and Therapeutic Indications for Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) in Patients with Pancreatic and Biliary Disease—Novel Interventional Procedures. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:6211-6225. [PMID: 36135057 PMCID: PMC9497766 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29090488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2022] [Revised: 08/22/2022] [Accepted: 08/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
There is growing evidence supporting the substantial, essential and indispensable role of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) as a key diagnostic armamentarium for upper GI oncologic surgery. Well described in countless publications, EUS holds that position in gastroenterological expert centers all over Europe. Despite its undisputable contributions to oncologic upper GI surgery, the availability of this technique at the expert level shows up in an irregular spread pattern. Endoscopic ultrasound’s primary use during the first few years after its creation was the detection of pancreatic cancer. From then on, EUS developed in different directions, becoming a diagnostic tool that increasingly better defines its status as a method of minimally invasive therapeutic applications and a useful addition to surgical options. As a result, several surgical interventions could even be replaced by ultrasound-targeted interventions. This process took place in just a few years and was made possible by technical development that sensibly combined high-resolution ultrasound with therapeutic endoscopy. The present article will serve to cover the most prevalent uses with supporting data considering the growing list of suggested indications for EUS while also examining cutting-edge initiatives that might soon become the standard of clinical practice. Endoscopic centers with high expertise are needed to train future experts in the growing field of EUS interventions.
Collapse
|
31
|
Garret C, Douillard M, David A, Péré M, Quenehervé L, Legros L, Archambeaud I, Douane F, Lerhun M, Regenet N, Gournay J, Coron E, Frampas E, Reignier J. Infected pancreatic necrosis complicating severe acute pancreatitis in critically ill patients: predicting catheter drainage failure and need for necrosectomy. Ann Intensive Care 2022; 12:71. [PMID: 35916981 PMCID: PMC9346045 DOI: 10.1186/s13613-022-01039-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2021] [Accepted: 06/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Recent guidelines advocate a step-up approach for managing suspected infected pancreatic necrosis (IPN) during acute pancreatitis. Nearly half the patients require secondary necrosectomy after catheter drainage. Our primary objective was to assess the external validity of a previously reported nomogram for catheter drainage, based on four predictors of failure. Our secondary objectives were to identify other potential predictors of catheter-drainage failure. We retrospectively studied consecutive patients admitted to the intensive care units (ICUs) of three university hospitals in France between 2012 and 2016, for severe acute pancreatitis with suspected IPN requiring catheter drainage. We assessed drainage success and failure rates in 72 patients, with success defined as survival without subsequent necrosectomy and failure as death and/or subsequent necrosectomy required by inadequate improvement. We plotted the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve for the nomogram and computed the area under the curve (AUROC). Results Catheter drainage alone was successful in 32 (44.4%) patients. The nomogram predicted catheter-drainage failure with an AUROC of 0.71. By multivariate analysis, catheter-drainage failure was independently associated with a higher body mass index [odds ratio (OR), 1.12; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.00–1.24; P = 0.048], heterogeneous collection (OR, 16.7; 95% CI, 1.83–152.46; P = 0.01), and respiratory failure onset within 24 h before catheter drainage (OR, 18.34; 95% CI, 2.18–154.3; P = 0.007). Conclusion Over half the patients required necrosectomy after failed catheter drainage. Newly identified predictors of catheter-drainage failure were heterogeneous collection and respiratory failure. Adding these predictors to the nomogram might help to identify patients at high risk of catheter-drainage failure. ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT03234166. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13613-022-01039-z.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Garret
- Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, 44000, Nantes, France.
| | - Marion Douillard
- Institut des Maladies de L'Appareil Digestif, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, 44000, Nantes, France
| | - Arthur David
- Radiologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Morgane Péré
- Plateforme de Méthodologie et Biostatistique, Direction de la Recherche, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, 44000, Nantes, France
| | - Lucille Quenehervé
- Service d'Hépatogastroentérologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Brest, 29200, Brest, France
| | - Ludivine Legros
- Service d'Hépatogastroentérologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes, 35203, Rennes, France
| | - Isabelle Archambeaud
- Institut des Maladies de L'Appareil Digestif, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, 44000, Nantes, France
| | - Frédéric Douane
- Radiologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Marc Lerhun
- Institut des Maladies de L'Appareil Digestif, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, 44000, Nantes, France
| | - Nicolas Regenet
- Institut des Maladies de L'Appareil Digestif, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, 44000, Nantes, France
| | - Jerome Gournay
- Institut des Maladies de L'Appareil Digestif, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, 44000, Nantes, France
| | - Emmanuel Coron
- Institut des Maladies de L'Appareil Digestif, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, 44000, Nantes, France
| | - Eric Frampas
- Radiologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Jean Reignier
- Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, 44000, Nantes, France
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Fabbri C, Baron TH, Gibiino G, Arcidiacono PG, Binda C, Anderloni A, Rizzatti G, Pérez-Miranda M, Lisotti A, Correale L, Gornals JB, Tarantino I, Petrone MC, Cecinato P, Fusaroli P, Larghi A. The endoscopic ultrasound features of pancreatic fluid collections and their impact on therapeutic decisions: an interobserver agreement study. Endoscopy 2022; 54:555-562. [PMID: 34496421 DOI: 10.1055/a-1640-4365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A validated classification of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) morphological characteristics and consequent therapeutic intervention(s) in pancreatic and peripancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) is lacking. We performed an interobserver agreement study among expert endosonographers assessing EUS-related PFC features and the therapeutic approaches used. METHODS 50 EUS videos of PFCs were independently reviewed by 12 experts and evaluated for PFC type, percentage solid component, presence of infection, recognition of and communication with the main pancreatic duct (MPD), stent choice for drainage, and direct endoscopic necrosectomy (DEN) performance and timing. The Gwet's AC1 coefficient was used to assess interobserver agreement. RESULTS A moderate agreement was found for lesion type (AC1, 0.59), presence of infection (AC1, 0.41), and need for DEN (AC1, 0.50), while fair or poor agreements were stated for percentage solid component (AC1, 0.15) and MPD recognition (AC1, 0.31). Substantial agreement was rated for ability to assess PFC-MPD communication (AC1, 0.69), decision between placing a plastic versus lumen-apposing metal stent (AC1, 0.62), and timing of DEN (AC1, 0.75). CONCLUSIONS Interobserver agreement between expert endosonographers regarding morphological features of PFCs appeared suboptimal, while decisions on therapeutic approaches seemed more homogeneous. Studies to achieve standardization of the diagnostic endosonographic criteria and therapeutic approaches to PFCs are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo Fabbri
- Unit of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital of Forlì and Bufalini Hospital of Cesena, AUSL Romagna, Italy
| | - Todd H Baron
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Giulia Gibiino
- Unit of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital of Forlì and Bufalini Hospital of Cesena, AUSL Romagna, Italy
| | - Paolo Giorgio Arcidiacono
- Pancreato-biliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Cecilia Binda
- Unit of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital of Forlì and Bufalini Hospital of Cesena, AUSL Romagna, Italy
| | - Andrea Anderloni
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milano, Italy
| | - Gianenrico Rizzatti
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.,CERTT, Center for Endoscopic Research Therapeutics and Training, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | - Manuel Pérez-Miranda
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital Universitario Rio Hortega, Valladolid, Spain
| | - Andrea Lisotti
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Loredana Correale
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Joan B Gornals
- Endoscopy Unit, Digestive Diseases Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ilaria Tarantino
- Endoscopy Service, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services, IRCCS-ISMETT, Palermo, Italy
| | - Maria Chiara Petrone
- Pancreato-biliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Cecinato
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova di Reggio Emilia, AUSL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Pietro Fusaroli
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Alberto Larghi
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.,CERTT, Center for Endoscopic Research Therapeutics and Training, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Bhakta D, de Latour R, Khanna L. Management of pancreatic fluid collections. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 7:17. [PMID: 35548474 PMCID: PMC9081921 DOI: 10.21037/tgh-2020-06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2020] [Accepted: 02/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic fluid collections often develop as a complication of acute pancreatitis but can be seen in a variety of conditions including chronic pancreatitis, trauma, malignancy or post-operatively. It is important to classify a pancreatic fluid collection in order to optimize treatment strategies and management. Most interventions are targeted towards the management of delayed complications of pancreatitis, including pancreatic pseudocysts and walled-off necrosis (WON), which often develop days to weeks after the initial episode of pancreatitis. Surgical, percutaneous, and endoscopic interventions are all possible methods for treatment of pancreatic fluid collections, however endoscopic drainage with endoscopic ultrasound has become first-line. Advances within endoscopic drainage strategies have also led to innovative changes in the specific stents used for treatment, with possible options including double pigtail plastic stents, fully covered self-expanding metal stents and lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimpal Bhakta
- New York University School of Medicine, New York, USA
| | | | - Lauren Khanna
- New York University School of Medicine, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Endoscopic Transmural Drainage and Necrosectomy in Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis: A Review. J Transl Int Med 2021; 9:168-176. [PMID: 34900627 PMCID: PMC8629413 DOI: 10.2478/jtim-2021-0031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Acute necrotizing pancreatitis occurs in 10%–20% of patients with acute pancreatitis (AP) which is one of the most important acute abdominal diseases that require hospital admission. Pancreatic necrosis is also associated with high mortality and morbidity. In the past 20 years, the treatment of pancreatic necrosis has shifted from open necrosectomy to minimally invasive techniques, such as endoscopic interventions. With the development of endoscopic techniques, the safety and effectiveness of endoscopic interventions have improved, but there exist several unresolved problems. Currently, there is no unified standard approach for endoscopic treatment of pancreatic necrosis that takes into account local expertise, anatomical features of necrosis, patients’ preferences, and comorbidity profile. We reviewed the current status of endoscopic therapy for acute necrotizing pancreatitis, focusing on the new endoscopic drainage technique and necrosectomy protocol.
Collapse
|
35
|
Zhang Y, Yuan EY, Peng M, Ding SX, Wang ZQ. Progress in research of minimally invasive therapy of local complications of acute pancreatitis. Shijie Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi 2021; 29:1349-1354. [DOI: 10.11569/wcjd.v29.i23.1349] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Acute pancreatitis is an inflammatory disease of the pancreas that can be life-threatening. Patients with severe acute pancreatitis require further rescue treatment in the intensive care unit. In recent years, treatment of local complications of acute pancreatitis has undergone considerable changes, including multidisciplinary team mode and individualized treatment scheme, and traditional open surgery has been gradually replaced by minimally invasive treatment. This article summarizes the progress in research on minimally invasive therapy of the local complications of acute pancreatitis in recent years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying Zhang
- Intensive Care Unit, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin 300052, China
| | - Er-Yan Yuan
- Intensive Care Unit, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin 300052, China
| | - Min Peng
- Intensive Care Unit, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin 300052, China
| | - Shao-Xue Ding
- Department of Hematology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin 300052, China
| | - Zhi-Qiang Wang
- Intensive Care Unit, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin 300052, China
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Pinto S, Bellizzi S, Badas R, Canfora ML, Loddo E, Spada S, Khalaf K, Fugazza A, Bergamini S. Direct Endoscopic Necrosectomy: Timing and Technique. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2021; 57:medicina57121305. [PMID: 34946249 PMCID: PMC8707414 DOI: 10.3390/medicina57121305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2021] [Revised: 11/22/2021] [Accepted: 11/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WOPN) is one of the local complications of acute pancreatitis (AP). Several interventional techniques have been developed over the last few years. The purpose of this narrative review is to explore such methodologies, with specific focus on endoscopic drainage and direct endoscopic necrosectomy (DEN), through evaluation of their indications and timing for intervention. Findings indicated how, after the introduction of lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS), DEN is becoming the favorite technique to treat WOPN, especially when large solid debris or infection are present. Additionally, DEN is associated with a lower adverse events rate and hospital stay, and with improved clinical outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sergio Pinto
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, University Hospital of Cagliari, 09042 Cagliari, Italy; (R.B.); (M.L.C.); (E.L.); (S.S.); (S.B.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-07051096423
| | - Saverio Bellizzi
- Medical Epidemiologist, Independent Consultant, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland;
| | - Roberta Badas
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, University Hospital of Cagliari, 09042 Cagliari, Italy; (R.B.); (M.L.C.); (E.L.); (S.S.); (S.B.)
| | - Maria Laura Canfora
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, University Hospital of Cagliari, 09042 Cagliari, Italy; (R.B.); (M.L.C.); (E.L.); (S.S.); (S.B.)
| | - Erica Loddo
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, University Hospital of Cagliari, 09042 Cagliari, Italy; (R.B.); (M.L.C.); (E.L.); (S.S.); (S.B.)
| | - Simone Spada
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, University Hospital of Cagliari, 09042 Cagliari, Italy; (R.B.); (M.L.C.); (E.L.); (S.S.); (S.B.)
| | - Kareem Khalaf
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, 20090 Milano, Italy;
| | - Alessandro Fugazza
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital-IRCCS, 20089 Rozzano, Italy;
| | - Silvio Bergamini
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, University Hospital of Cagliari, 09042 Cagliari, Italy; (R.B.); (M.L.C.); (E.L.); (S.S.); (S.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Asif S, Lakhtakia S, Reddy N. Endoscopic full-thickness resection for pancreatic fluid collection drainage: not yet there. Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 94:1017-1018. [PMID: 34656280 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.06.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2021] [Accepted: 06/25/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Shujaath Asif
- Department of Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology Hospitals, Hyderabad, India
| | - Sundeep Lakhtakia
- Department of Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology Hospitals, Hyderabad, India
| | - Nageshwar Reddy
- Department of Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology Hospitals, Hyderabad, India
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Fedorov AV, Ektov VN, Khodorkovsky MA. [Endoscopic transluminal interventions in the treatment of acute necrotizing pancreatitis]. Khirurgiia (Mosk) 2021:85-92. [PMID: 34480460 DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia202109185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
The review is devoted to endoscopic transluminal interventions in the treatment of acute necrotizing pancreatitis. Terminology, indications and options for transluminal drainage procedures and endoscopic sequestrectomy are presented in detail. The authors analyzed the results of numerous studies devoted to effectiveness of endoscopic interventions and possible combination of treatment options. Modern international clinical guidelines indicating the feasibility of endoscopic treatment of acute necrotizing pancreatitis in multi-field specialized centers are considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A V Fedorov
- Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry, Moscow, Russia
| | - V N Ektov
- Burdenko Voronezh State Medical University, Voronezh, Russia
| | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To update on recent advances in interventional endoscopic ultrasound (INVEUS) techniques. RECENT FINDINGS The introduction of linear echoendoscopes with larger instrument channels and the combined development of new tools and devices have enabled various new applications of minimally invasive endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided transluminal interventions of the pancreas, biliary system and peri-gastrointestinal structures. In this review, EUS-guided interventions are discussed and evaluated: drainage of peripancreatic fluid collections, access and drainage of bile ducts, gallbladder and pancreatic duct, treatment of gastrointestinal haemorrhage, coeliac plexus block and coeliac plexus neurolysis, fiducial placement, solid and cystic tumour ablation, drug delivery and brachytherapy, gastroenterostomy, angiotherapy and other EUS-guided applications. The EUS-guided interventions are classified based on the available evidence as established or experimental, standardized or nonstandardized procedures in common or rare diseases with well or little known complications and their established or nonestablished treatment. SUMMARY Some EUS-guided interventions have sparse published evidence with only single-centre studies, case series or individual case reports, others like drainage of peripancreatic fluid collections have become widely accepted practice. INVEUS has been accepted as an alternative to several surgical approaches, EUS-guided techniques result in faster recovery times, shorter hospital stay and lower costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph F Dietrich
- Department Allgemeine Innere Medizin (DAIM), Kliniken Hirslanden Beau Site, Salem und Permanence, Switzerland
| | - Barbara Braden
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Christian Jenssen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Krankenhaus Maerkisch-Oderland, D-15344 Strausberg and Brandenburg Institute of Clinical Ultrasound at Medical University Brandenburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Binda C, Coluccio C, Sbrancia M, Fabbri C. Role of endoscopic ultrasonography in the management of peripancreatic collections. Diagnostic and therapeutic approach. Minerva Gastroenterol (Torino) 2021; 68:162-176. [PMID: 33988009 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-5985.21.02874-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Pancreatic fluid collections are surrounded by a wall of granulation tissue and may contain necrotic debris. They occur following a severe acute pancreatitis and most of the cases resolve spontaneously after several weeks. However, their management may lead to a very hardto-treat condition, requiring a multidisciplinary approach. During the last decades we assisted to a change of paradigm involving Endoscopic Ultrasonography, from a pure diagnostic technique to an interventional-therapeutic one, allowing an effective, safe and less invasive approach than other existing treatment standards, historically consisting of surgical and percutaneous drainage. Treatment of pancreatic fluid collections is indicated if they become infected or symptomatic. Over the past years, exponential developments were done in interventional endoscopic approach, making it the first line suggested modality. The use of endoscopic ultrasound allows assessment of the collection, even when it is not directly bulging on gastrointestinal wall, creation of an internal fistulous tract, checking for surrounding vessels with the use of Doppler, and deployment of a stent avoiding the discomfort of external tubes. Several types of stent have been used for endoscopic drainage: plastic double pigtail stents, fully covered self-expanding metal stents and, more recently, lumen apposing metal stents, which are considered revolutionary because of their two-side flanges and wide and short internal channel, a new design that made easier direct endoscopic necrosectomy. This review aims to go through currently available literature on the diagnostic and therapeutic role of Endoscopic Ultrasonography to handle pancreatic fluid collections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cecilia Binda
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Forlì-Cesena Hospitals, AUSL Romagna, Forlì-Cesena, Italy
| | - Chiara Coluccio
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Forlì-Cesena Hospitals, AUSL Romagna, Forlì-Cesena, Italy -
| | - Monica Sbrancia
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Forlì-Cesena Hospitals, AUSL Romagna, Forlì-Cesena, Italy
| | - Carlo Fabbri
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Forlì-Cesena Hospitals, AUSL Romagna, Forlì-Cesena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Shah R, Basha J, Rana S, Jagannath S, Rai P, Chowdhury SD, Sharma ZD, Gunjan D, Patle S, Rao AC, Zacharia P, Sanjeevi R, Sahu M, Philip M, Garg P, Puri R, Reddy DN, Lakhthakia S, Dhir V. Endoscopic Management of Pancreatic Fluid Collections: Guidelines of Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy of India and Indian EUS Club. JOURNAL OF DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY 2021. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1728956] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Rahul Shah
- Department of Gastroenterology, Institute of Digestive and Liver Care, SL Raheja Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Jahangeer Basha
- Department of Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
| | - Surinder Rana
- Department of Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Soumya Jagannath
- Department of Gastroenterology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Praveer Rai
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | | | - Zubin Dev Sharma
- Department of Gastroenterology, Medanta The Medicity, Gurugram, Haryana, India
| | - Deepak Gunjan
- Department of Gastroenterology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Saurabh Patle
- Department of Gastroenterology, Medanta The Medicity, Gurugram, Haryana, India
| | - A Chalapathi Rao
- Department of Gastroenterology, Iconkrishi Institute of Medical Sciences, Vishakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India
| | - Prakash Zacharia
- Department of Gastroenterology, Lisie Hospital, Kochi, Kerala, India
| | - Rajesh Sanjeevi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Manoj Sahu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Institute of Medical Sciences and Sum Hospital, Bhubaneshwar, Odisha, India
| | - Matthew Philip
- Department of Gastroenterology, Lisie Hospital, Kochi, Kerala, India
| | - Pramod Garg
- Department of Gastroenterology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Rajesh Puri
- Department of Gastroenterology, Medanta The Medicity, Gurugram, Haryana, India
| | - D Nageshwar Reddy
- Department of Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
| | | | - Vinay Dhir
- Department of Gastroenterology, Institute of Digestive and Liver Care, SL Raheja Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Predictors of the need for necrosectomy in patients with walled-off pancreatic necrosis treated with lumen apposition metal stents. Surg Endosc 2021; 36:1339-1346. [PMID: 33660124 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08411-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2020] [Accepted: 02/15/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Endoscopic necrosectomy through lumen apposition metal stents (LAMS) is increasingly being used for complicated walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WOPN), but the need for necrosectomy after stent placement is not well understood. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical, endoscopic, and radiologic predictors of the need for necrosectomy in patients treated with LAMS. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed patients with WOPN treated with LAMS from 2014 to 2017. Necrosectomy was performed only in patients who had recurrent fever or hemodynamic instability during follow-up. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS We included 15 patients, 67% men and median age was 75 (54-76) years. Two (13%) presented adverse events, one immediate and one delayed. In the first case, the stent migrated to the gastric cavity during deployment but was relocated in the same procedure. In the second case, the patient presented bleeding on day 36 due to a pseudoaneurysm that was successfully treated with embolization. Clinical success was 100%, but five patients (33%) required endoscopic necrosectomy (4 mechanical and 1 irrigation) and one (7%) required surgical necrosectomy of distant collections. The percentage of necrosis in the collection detected in a previous CT scan (45 [35-66]% vs 10 [5-17]%) was the only factor to predict the need for necrosectomy in the multivariate analysis (OR 1.18 [1.01-1.39]). CONCLUSION LAMS is efficient to treat WOPN but more than a third will need necrosectomy. The percentage of necrosis in the collection detected in the CT scan seems to predict the need for necrosectomy.
Collapse
|
43
|
Albers D, Meining A, Hann A, Ayoub YK, Schumacher B. Direct endoscopic necrosectomy in infected pancreatic necrosis using lumen-apposing metal stents: Early intervention does not compromise outcome. Endosc Int Open 2021; 9:E490-E495. [PMID: 33655055 PMCID: PMC7899788 DOI: 10.1055/a-1341-0654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2020] [Accepted: 11/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims Infection of pancreatic necrosis is a dreaded complication requiring an intervention. Nevertheless, the optimal timing of the first intervention is unclear, and consensus data are sparse. This retrospective two-center study evaluated direct endoscopic necrosectomy using lumen apposing metal stents in case of proven or suspected infected pancreatic necrosis in an early stage of the disease. Patients and methods Forty-nine patients with infected pancreatic necrosis were included. Sequent direct endoscopic necrosectomies after lumen apposing metal stent insertion (LAMS) were performed until the resolution of necrosis. In all patients, the first endoscopic intervention was performed within the first 30 days after first proof of pancreatic necrosis. Primary outcome parameters were inflammatory activity, days spent in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), and mortality. Results The patient cohort received median 4 necrosectomies (3-5) after a median of 7 days (3-11) after first proof of pancreatic necrosis. Technical and clinical success were achieved in 98.3 % and 87.8 %, respectively; the mortality rate was 8.2 %. The median C-reactive protein level decreased from 241 mg/L (182.9-288.9) before the intervention to a median of 23.3 mg/L (18-60) after therapy. The median time period in the ICU was 5 days (3-9). Conclusions Early endoscopic therapy in the form of direct endoscopic necrosectomy after LAMS placement within the first 30 days after proof of pancreatic necrosis is effective and does not result in poor outcome. Our retrospective data suggest that early intervention before walled-off necrosis is formed is tenable when it is essential due to the patient's clinical deterioration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Albers
- Department of Gastroenterology, Elisabeth-Krankenhaus Essen, academic hospital of the University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany
| | - Alexander Meining
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Alexander Hann
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Germany
| | | | - Brigitte Schumacher
- Department of Gastroenterology, Elisabeth-Krankenhaus Essen, academic hospital of the University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
When Should We Perform Endoscopic Drainage and Necrosectomy for Walled-Off Necrosis? J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9124072. [PMID: 33348675 PMCID: PMC7767133 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9124072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2020] [Revised: 11/24/2020] [Accepted: 12/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Endoscopic drainage and necrosectomy are now accepted treatment approaches for patients with symptomatic walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WON). The current recommendations advocate step-up approaches for the treatment of symptomatic WON. Previous recommendations stipulated that endoscopic intervention should be delayed until more than four weeks after the onset. Recent data on early drainage have been increasing and this option might be considered in well-encapsulated cases, but the percutaneous route is preferred if the drainage is performed within two weeks after onset or in nonencapsulated cases. Recently, additional drainage methods, such as the multiple gateway technique and multiple stent placement, have been developed to open up multiple dead spaces in the WON cavity. Endoscopic necrosectomy could be performed via the transluminal route or percutaneous route after failed initial and additional drainage procedures. The use of novel lumen-apposing stents is a promising treatment option that could reduce the number of steps, the procedure time, and the overall number of necrosectomies.
Collapse
|
45
|
Pereira F, Caldeira A, Leite S, Marques S, Moreira T, Moutinho-Ribeiro P, Nunes N, Bispo M. GRUPUGE Perspective: Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Drainage of Peripancreatic Collections. GE PORTUGUESE JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY 2020; 28:39-51. [PMID: 33564703 PMCID: PMC7841806 DOI: 10.1159/000509193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2020] [Accepted: 05/20/2020] [Indexed: 04/28/2023]
Abstract
Pancreatic and peripancreatic collections (PPC) are a known complication of acute pancreatitis. They are categorized into four types of collection: (1) acute peripancreatic fluid collection, (2) pseudocyst, (3) acute necrotic collection and (4) walled-off necrosis. Most PPC resolve spontaneously or are persistent but asymptomatic. Intervention is needed in a minority of patients with infected or symptomatic collection. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided transmural drainage is currently the first-line treatment option for PPC management. It has shown great technical and clinical success, similar to percutaneous or surgical approaches, but with lower morbidity and costs and better quality of life. In this review article, the GRUPUGE presents an updated perspective on the potential role of endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of peripancreatic collections, addressing the selection criteria and the technical issues of different techniques and analysing emerging data on their efficacy and safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Flávio Pereira
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Amato Lusitano, Castelo Branco, Portugal
- *Flávio Pereira, Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Amato Lusitano, Av. Pedro Álvares Cabral, PT–6000-085 Castelo Branco (Portugal),
| | - Ana Caldeira
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Amato Lusitano, Castelo Branco, Portugal
| | - Sílvia Leite
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital da Senhora da Oliveira, Guimarães, Portugal
| | - Susana Marques
- Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Teresa Moreira
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital de Santo António, Porto, Portugal
| | - Pedro Moutinho-Ribeiro
- Department of Gastroenterology, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de São João, Porto, Portugal
| | - Nuno Nunes
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital do Divino Espírito Santo, Ponta Delgada, Portugal
| | - Miguel Bispo
- Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Mendoza Ladd A, Bashashati M, Contreras A, Umeanaeto O, Robles A. Endoscopic pancreatic necrosectomy in the United States-Mexico border: A cross sectional study. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 12:149-158. [PMID: 32477449 PMCID: PMC7243577 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v12.i5.149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2020] [Revised: 05/06/2020] [Accepted: 05/12/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A recent expert panel issued recommendations about the technical aspects of direct endoscopic necrosectomy (DEN) for pancreatic walled-off necrosis (WON). However, significant technical heterogeneity still exists among endoscopists.
AIM To report the outcomes of our DEN technique and how it differs from a recent expert consensus statement and previous studies.
METHODS Medical records of patients with WON who underwent DEN from September 2016 - May 2019 were queried for the following information: Age, gender, ethnicity, etiology of acute pancreatitis, WON location and size, DEN technical information, adverse events (AEs) and outcomes. Adverse events were graded according to the American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Lexicon grading system. Technical success was defined as adequate lumen apposing metal stent (LAMS) deployment plus removal of ≥ 90% of necrosum. Clinical success was defined as complete resolution of WON cavity by imaging and resolution of symptoms at ≤ 3 months (mo) after last DEN. Data analysis was performed using mean and standard deviation for continuous variables, frequency and proportion for categorical variables, and median and range for interval data.
RESULTS A total of 21 patients underwent DEN. Most of them were Hispanic and their mean age was 51 ± 17 years. The majority of the collections were located in the body of the pancreas and the mean size was 13 cm ± 5 cm. The most common indication was persistent vomiting. Antibiotics were administered only in cases of infected necrosis. All LAMS were placed without radiological guidance, dilated the same day of deployment and removed after a mean of 27 ± 11 d. Routine cross-sectional imaging immediately after drainage was not performed. The mean interval between DEN sessions was 7 ± 4 d and the mean number of DEN/patient was 3 ± 2. Technical and clinical success rates were both 95%. AEs were seen in 5 patients and included: Sepsis (2), stent migration (1), stent maldeployment (1), perforation (1). The sensitivity and positive predictive value of an occluded LAMS leading to sepsis was 50% and 0.11 respectively. No fatalities were observed.
CONCLUSION Our DEN technique differed significantly from the one recommended by a recent expert panel and the one published in previous studies. Despite these differences excellent clinical outcomes were obtained.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Mendoza Ladd
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Paul L Foster School of Medicine, El Paso, TX 79905, United States
| | - Mohammad Bashashati
- Department of Internal Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Paul L Foster School of Medicine, El Paso, TX 79905, United States
| | - Alberto Contreras
- Department of Internal Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Paul L Foster School of Medicine, El Paso, TX 79905, United States
| | - Onyedika Umeanaeto
- Department of Internal Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Paul L Foster School of Medicine, El Paso, TX 79905, United States
| | - Alejandro Robles
- Department of Internal Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Paul L Foster School of Medicine, El Paso, TX 79905, United States
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Irisawa A, Miyoshi H, Itoi T, Ryozawa S, Kida M, Inui K. Recent innovations in therapeutic endoscopy for pancreatobiliary diseases. Dig Endosc 2020; 32:309-315. [PMID: 31240746 DOI: 10.1111/den.13473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2019] [Accepted: 06/23/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
The development of endoscopic treatment for pancreatobiliary diseases in recent years is remarkable. In addition to conventional transpapillary treatments under endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), new endoscopic ultrasound-guided therapy is being developed and implemented. On the other hand, due to the development/improvement of various devices such as new metal stents, a new therapeutic strategy under ERCP is also advocated. The present review focuses on recent advances in the endoscopic treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts, walled-off necrosis, malignant biliary strictures, and benign biliary/pancreatic duct strictures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Atsushi Irisawa
- Department of Gastroenterology, Dokkyo Medical University School of Medicine, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Hironao Miyoshi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Bantane Hospital, Fujita Health University, Aichi, Japan
| | - Takao Itoi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shomei Ryozawa
- Department of Gastroenterology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Mitsuhiro Kida
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Kazuo Inui
- Department of Gastroenterology, Bantane Hospital, Fujita Health University, Aichi, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Rerknimitr R. Endoscopic Transmural Necrosectomy: Timing, Indications, and Methods. Clin Endosc 2019; 53:49-53. [PMID: 31530792 PMCID: PMC7003012 DOI: 10.5946/ce.2019.131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2019] [Accepted: 08/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Walled-off necrosis is considered one of the most severe complications after an episode of severe acute pancreatitis. Traditionally, percutaneous drainage is selected as the first treatment step, while open surgery can be planned as a secondary option if necrosectomy is required. In recent years, endoscopic necrosectomy has evolved as a more favorable approach. To date, a step-up treatment strategy is recommended, particularly when a plastic stent is selected as the drainage device. Multi-gateway endoscopic therapy may be used in a step-up fashion if only one stent fails to clear debris. Over many years, there has been an evolution in stent selection, from plastic to metallic stents. Within a few years of its clinical usage, lumen-apposing stents are gaining more popularity as they offer direct endoscopic necrosectomy and only require a few sessions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rungsun Rerknimitr
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.,Center of Excellence for Innovation and Endoscopy in Gastrointestinal Oncology, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Rizzatti G, Rimbaş M, Larghi A. Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Drainage for Infected Necrotizing Pancreatitis: Better Than Surgery But Still Lacking Treatment Protocol Standardization. Gastroenterology 2019; 157:582-583. [PMID: 31102662 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.01.274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2018] [Accepted: 01/08/2019] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Gianenrico Rizzatti
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Mihai Rimbaş
- Gastroenterology Department, Colentina Clinical Hospital, Carol Davila University of Medicine, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Alberto Larghi
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Rana SS, Shah J, Kang M, Gupta R. Complications of endoscopic ultrasound-guided transmural drainage of pancreatic fluid collections and their management. Ann Gastroenterol 2019; 32:441-450. [PMID: 31474789 PMCID: PMC6686089 DOI: 10.20524/aog.2019.0404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2019] [Accepted: 07/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The development of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage techniques and lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) has markedly reduced the complication rate of endoscopic transmural drainage of pancreatic collections and made these procedures safer and more effective. Despite its improved safety profile, various types of complications, some even life-threatening, can occur after EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections. Stent maldeployment/migration, bleeding, gastrointestinal perforation, and air embolism are important complications of EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic collections. Delayed complications weeks after the procedure, such as bleeding and buried LAMS due to the presence of prolonged indwelling transmural stents, have also been described. Careful patient selection, with proper assessment of the size, solid necrotic content and location of the collection, as well as an in-depth understanding of various risk factors that predict complications, are important for a safer and more effective endoscopic transmural drainage. For a better clinical outcome, it is important for the endoscopist to know about various complications of EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic collections, as well as their appropriate management strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Surinder S Rana
- Department of Gastroenterology (Surinder S. Rana, Jimil Shah)
| | - Jimil Shah
- Department of Gastroenterology (Surinder S. Rana, Jimil Shah)
| | | | - Rajesh Gupta
- Department of Surgery (Rajesh Gupta), Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India
| |
Collapse
|