Real-time audio-visual feedback with handheld nonautomated external defibrillator devices during cardiopulmonary resuscitation for in-hospital cardiac arrest: A meta-analysis

Real-time feedback for CPR quality - A scoping review

Background

Previous systematic reviews have failed to find an association between the use of real-time feedback during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and patient outcomes. However, these reviews excluded studies examining feedback with other system changes. As part of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) continuous evidence evaluation process, we conducted a scoping review to examine the current state of this literature and the use of real-time feedback in this form.

Methods/Data sources

A protocol and search strategy was developed. We searched Medline, EMBASE, and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) from inception to May 2024. Cochrane (Cochrane (specifically, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews) is contained in Medline so was not searched separately. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they were published or unpublished (grey-literature) studies involving children or adults that examined the effect of real-time feedback or prompting on the quality of CPR following cardiac arrest. Data were extracted and audited independently. For each study, the following information were extracted: the author(s); year of publication; timeframe; study design; country; population; intervention and comparator; type of feedback or prompt; outcomes measured; main findings for CPR quality, and; main findings for patient outcomes. Reviewers also allocated key themes to each study and held a series of consensus discussions to consolidate themes across the included studies.

Results

We screened 2,657 titles and included 60 studies. Our analysis identified five overlapping themes in the extended literature: system change and quality improvement; impact on patient outcomes; better CPR quality without improved patient outcome; CPR feedback as a generator of other CPR metrics; and CPR feedback as a potential harm. Results revealed a substantial adjacent literature, particularly on implementing high-performance CPR as part of quality improvement programs.

Conclusions

This scoping review has identified a large body of literature and specific themes of interest in relation to feedback for CPR quality. Future systematic reviews should include studies examining real-time feedback with other system changes.

User Needs and Factors Associated With the Acceptability of Audiovisual Feedback Devices for Chest Compression Monitoring in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

The use of audiovisual feedback devices to guide the quality of chest compressions during cardiopulmonary resuscitation has increased in recent years. Audiovisual feedback devices can be classified as integrated (eg, Zoll AED Plus defibrillator) or standalone (eg, CPRmeter). This study aimed to explore users' needs and factors affecting the acceptability of audiovisual feedback devices. Semistructured interviews were conducted with healthcare professionals involved in lifesaving activities. The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology was used as a theoretical framework for the study. The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology model has four constructs: performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, and facilitating factors. Ten themes were identified under the four constructs. The performance expectancy constructs include three themes: perceived usefulness, outcome expectation, and applicability in diverse situations. The effort expectancy construct encompasses two themes: user-friendliness and complexity. The social influence construct has two themes: social and organizational factors. Lastly, the facilitating factors construct includes three themes: staff competence, perceived cost, and compatibility of devices. Exploring the needs and factors influencing the acceptability of audiovisual feedback devices used during cardiopulmonary resuscitation will inform healthcare providers, managers, manufacturers, and procurers on how to improve the efficiency and use of these devices.

The effect of standalone audio-visual feedback devices on the quality of chest compressions during laypersons' cardiopulmonary resuscitation training: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS

Individual studies that investigated the effect of standalone audio-visual feedback (AVF) devices during laypersons' cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training have yielded conflicting results. This review aimed to evaluate the effect of standalone AVF devices on the quality of chest compressions during laypersons' CPR training.

METHOD AND RESULT

Randomized controlled trials of simulation studies recruiting participants without actual patient CPR experience were included. The intervention evaluated was the quality of chest compressions with standalone AVF devices vs. without AVF devices. Databases, such as PubMed, Cochrane Central, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Web of Science, and PsycINFO, were searched from January 2010 to January 2022. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. A meta-analysis alongside a narrative synthesis was used for examining the effect of standalone AVF devices.Sixteen studies were selected for this systematic review. A meta-analysis revealed an increased compression depth of 2.22 mm [95% CI (Confidence Interval), 0.88-3.55, P = 0.001] when participants performed CPR using the feedback devices. Besides, AVF devices enabled laypersons to deliver compression rates closer to the recommended range of 100-120 per min. No improvement was noted in chest recoil and hand positioning when participants used standalone AVF devices.

CONCLUSION

The quality of the included studies was variable, and different standalone AVF devices were used. Standalone AVF devices were instrumental in guiding laypersons to deliver deeper compressions without compromising the quality of compression rates. However, the devices did not improve the quality of chest recoil and placement of the hands.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO: CRD42020205754.

Comparison of chest compression quality between 2-minute switch and rescuer fatigue switch: A randomized controlled trial

Background:

Rescuers performing chest compressions (CCs) should be rotated every 2 min or sooner if rescuers become fatigued. Is it preferable to switch rescuers when they become fatigued in such cases? This study was performed to compare the quality of CCs between two scenarios in hospitalized patients with cardiac arrest: 2-minute rescuer switch and rescuer fatigue switch.

Methods:

This randomized controlled trial involved 144 health-care providers, randomized to switch CC on the manikin model with 2-minute or rescuer fatigue. We recorded the CC quality for 20 min.

Results:

There were no significant differences in the percentage of target compressions, mean depth of compressions, or mean compression rate between the two groups. However, the rescuer fatigue switch group showed a significantly lower frequency of interruptions (4 vs. 9 times, P < 0.001) and a longer duration of each compression cycle (237 vs. 117 sec, P < 0.001). The change in the respiratory rate from before to after performing compressions was significantly greater in the 2-minute switch group (12 vs. 8 bpm, P = 0.036).

Conclusion:

The use of a rescuer fatigue switch CC approach resulted in no decrease in the quality of CC, suggesting that it may be used as an alternate strategy for managing in-hospital cardiac arrest.

Survival to intensive care unit discharge among in-hospital cardiac arrest patients by applying audiovisual feedback device

Aims

Survival rates after in‐hospital cardiac arrest remain very low. Although there is evidence that the use of audiovisual feedback devices can improve compression components, there are no data on patient survival. Therefore, we conducted this study to analyse the survival rate of patients with in‐hospital cardiac arrest after discharge from the intensive care unit.

Methods and results

This study was a secondary analysis of a prospective, randomized, controlled, parallel study of patients who received either standard manual chest compression or a real‐time feedback device. Parametric and semi‐parametric models were fitted to the data. Different survival time of length of stay was investigated by univariate and multiple analyses. Pearson's correlation between length of stay and hospital length of stay was obtained. A total of 900 patients with a mean survival time of 35 days were included. Intervention was associated with a higher length of stay. Relative time was significant in adjusted fitted log‐normal regression for intervention group, female gender, and cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the night shift. A positive correlation between length of stay and hospital length of stay was found.

Conclusions

Implementation of feedback device improved survival and length of stay. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation performance during the night shift decreased the survival time, which could be due to the inexperienced staff available outside working hours.