Clinical, Histopathological Characteristics and Immunohistochemical Findings in Lichen Planus Pigmentosus

Ichthyosiform Lichen Planus Pigmentosus in a 19-Year-Old Male Patient: Case Report

Lichen planus pigmentosus (LPP) is a condition characterized by persistent and asymptomatic brownish-black-to-blue or purple-gray pigmentation, predominantly in the face and sun-exposed areas, commonly in dark-skinned individuals. Several clinical variants of LPP have been reported. However, the ichthyosiform type of LPP has not been reported. We present a 19-year-old male patient who presented with a 7-year history of asymptomatic grayish macules; patches with fine scales on the face, trunk, and upper extremities; and grayish plaques with thick "ichthyosiform" scales on the lower extremities. The diagnosis of LPP was proven by histopathological findings on both the macular and ichthyosiform plaques. Cluster differentiation (CD) 68 stain highlights the same density of pigment-laden macrophages in both the gray macule and the ichthyosiform plaque. The cause of LPP is unknown. Transcription factor anomalies may play a role in increased keratinization of lichen planus lesions. It can be assumed that the mechanism of the altered distribution of keratinization may occur on the ichthyosiform lesions in this patient. The terminology "ichthyosiform lichen planus pigmentosus" is hereby proposed to be added to the clinical variants of LPP.

A clinico-epidemiological study of different dermoscopic patterns in hyperpigmented facial lesions in a tertiary care centre

Introduction

Facial pigmentation is a common presentation of patients attending dermatology out patient department (OPD) and is of great concern to patients. Facial pigmentation may be multifactorial and is only rarely diagnosed accurately by a detailed history and clinical examination. Pigmentary disorders cause psychological distress and negatively impact the quality of life of an individual.

Aims and Objectives

(1) To study different dermoscopic patterns in facial melanosis. (2) To estimate the frequency of different dermoscopic patterns.

Materials and Methods

Patients with facial hyperpigmentation attending the dermatology OPD were recruited after taking their written consent. A detailed history was taken to collect demographic data. Clinical examination and dermoscopy were done in all patients. Biopsy was done as and when required. Descriptive statistics has been used to describe the quantitative data. Qualitative data were presented as frequency and percentage for clinical and dermoscopic patterns.

Results

The study included 100 patients with 15 different facial melanoses. The most common age group affected was 21-40 years in 53 (53%) cases. The female-to-male ratio was 1.63:1. Melasma was reported as the most common cause of facial melanosis constituting 49 (49%) of the total cases. Out of the total melasma cases, epidermal melasma constituted 22 (45%) cases, dermal melasma constituted four (4%) cases and mixed melasma constituted 23 (47%) cases. Other cases included were lichen planus pigmentosus (14; 14%), facial acanthosis nigricans (14; 14%), periorbital hyperpigmentation (7; 7%), post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (4; 4%), exogenous ochronosis (2; 2%), lentigines (2; 2%), frictional melanosis (2;2%), and one case each of Becker's nevus, nevus of Ota, olanzapine-induced hyperpigmentation, Riehl's melanosis, macular amyloidosis, and tanning.

Conclusions

Melasma was reported as the most common cause of facial melanosis. The most common dermoscopic feature was accentuated pseudopigment network. The study is beneficial in understanding the different clinical and dermoscopic patterns of facial melanosis, thus helping the physician to effectively manage the conditions and reduce the need of biopsy.

Limitations

(1) A small sample size. (2) Histopathological correlation was not done in all cases.

Lichen Planus Pigmentosus Inversus: A Case Report of a Man Presenting With a Pigmented Lichenoid Axillary Inverse Dermatosis (PLAID)

Lichen planus pigmentosus is an uncommon subtype of lichen planus and lichen planus pigmentosus inversus is a rare variant of lichen planus pigmentosus. Lichen planus pigmentosus inversus typically presents as hyperpigmented patches or plaques, particularly in the intertriginous areas such as the axillae, the groin and inguinal folds, and in the submammary region. In some patients with lichen planus pigmentosus inversus, the condition can present as a pigmented lichenoid axillary inverse dermatosis (PLAID) when the lesions are in the axillae. A 49-year-old Hispanic man who had hyperlipidemia and diabetes mellitus developed lichen planus pigmentosus inversus and presented with a PLAID. Skin biopsies established the diagnosis of lichen planus pigmentosus inversus. The clinical differential diagnosis of lichen planus pigmentosus inversus includes inherited disorders, primary cutaneous dermatoses, acquired dyschromias, and reactions to topical or systemic medications. Friction in intertriginous areas has been related to the development of lichen planus pigmentosus inversus. Factors that can precipitate lichen planus pigmentosus inversus include not only topical exposure to almond oil, amala oil, cold and cosmetic creams, henna, and paraphenyldiamine but also either topical contact or consumption of mustard oil and nickel. Lichen planus pigmentosus inversus can be associated with autoimmune conditions (hypothyroidism), endocrinopathies (diabetes mellitus), and hyperlipidemia. The dyschromia found in patients with lichen planus pigmentosus inversus is frequently refractory to treatment. Initial management includes removal of potential disease triggers such as eliminating tight clothing to stop friction with the adjacent skin. Topical corticosteroids do not result in improvement; however, topical calcineurin inhibitors such as tacrolimus have been reported to be efficacious. In conclusion, inverse lichen planus and lichen planus pigmentosus inversus can present with a PLAID; whereas topical corticosteroids may be helpful to resolve inverse lichen planus lesions, topical tacrolimus may be useful to improve the dyschromia in lichen planus pigmentosus inversus.

Skin of color in dermatopathology: does color matter?

Skin of color (SoC) remains an understudied and under taught area of dermatology despite its rising importance. Race and ethnicity play a particularly important role in dermatology as skin pigmentation can affect the manifestation and presentation of many common dermatoses. With this review, we seek to review pertinent differences in SoC histology, as well as highlight the histopathology of conditions more common in SoC and address inherent bias that may affect accurate dermatopathology sign out.

A Case of Unilateral Blaschko-Linear Lichen Planus Pigmentosus in a Seven-Year-Old Female: A Rare Presentation

Lichen planus pigmentosus (LPP) is a rare form of lichen planus that typically affects middle-aged people with darker-pigmented skin. LPP is associated with a longer clinical course than classical lichen planus, which distinguishes it clinically. Its occurrence in children is uncommon, with few reported cases in this population in the literature. We report a rare presentation of unilateral blaschkoid LPP in a seven-year-old Saudi Arabian female patient.

Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia Associated with Lichen Planus Pigmentosus: Not Only in Dark Phototypes

The association between frontal fibrosing alopecia and lichen planus pigmetosus was first described in African women. Later, most reports about this association involved dark-skinned patients. Here, we describe 5 cases of frontal fibrosing alopecia associated with lichen planus pigmentosus in light-skinned women from Argentina. Our communication highlights the strength of both entities' association also in lower Fitzpatrick phototypes.

Ashy Dermatosis and Lichen Planus Pigmentosus: The Histopathological Differences

Background

Ashy dermatosis (AD) and lichen planus pigmentosus (LPP) are both acquired macular pigmentation of uncertain aetiology. Despite the controversy surrounding their entities, recent global consensus has concluded that they are 2 different diseases with distinct clinical presentations. Nevertheless, there are limited data on their histopathological comparisons.

Objective

To evaluate the differences in histopathological findings between AD and LPP.

Methods

Electronic records and photographs of patients with the diagnosis of AD or LPP from January 2008 to December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed by a dermatologist. Patients were then classified into groups with AD and LPP, based on the clinical descriptions from the recent consensus. Those with history/clinical presentations suggestive of other causes of macular pigmentation were excluded. The histopathological diagnosis of AD and LPP was then reevaluated by a blinded dermatopathologist.

Results

One hundred and twenty-four patients with acquired macular pigmentation were identified; 24 were excluded due to clinical history or photographs being inconsistent with AD or LPP. Of the remaining 100 patients, 71 had clinical findings consistent with LPP while 29 had AD. The prevalence of epidermal hyperkeratosis was significantly higher in LPP when compared to AD (33.8% vs. 0%, p < 0.001), as well as epidermal hypergranulosis (35.2% vs. 0%, p < 0.001), lichenoid dermatitis (49.3% vs. 7.1%, p < 0.001), perifollicular infiltration (47.9% vs.10.3%, p < 0.001), and perifollicular fibrosis (35.2% vs. 10.3%, p=0.01). In addition, the degree of pigmentary incontinence was more severe in LPP (21.1% vs. 3.5%, p=0.015). For AD, vacuolization of the epidermal basal cell layer was more common (96.4% vs. 77.5%, p=0.02).

Conclusions

Although most cases of AD and LPP can be diagnosed clinically, in doubtful cases, histopathological findings of lichenoid dermatitis, epidermal hyperkeratosis/hypergranulosis, and moderate to severe pigmentary incontinence can help distinguish LPP from AD.

Modified phenol peels for treatment-refractory hyperpigmentation of lichen planus pigmentosus: A retrospective clinico-dermoscopic analysis

BACKGROUND

Lichen Planus Pigmentosus (LPP), a disorder with stubborn treatment-refractory hyperpigmentation predominantly affects the darker skin. Deep dermal pigmentary incontinence of LPP renders the condition treatment-refractory.

OBJECTIVES

Lack of a consistently effective depigmenting treatment protocol of inactive LPP mandates exploration of novel approaches. We analyzed the effect of six sessions of modified phenol peel on reduction of pigmentation of LPP in Indian patients.

METHODS

The results of a retrospective analysis of the efficacy and safety of six sessions of Croton oil free phenol combination (CFPC) peel done every 3 weeks, for inactive LPP-associated hyperpigmentation in 17 patients are presented. Efficacy evaluation was done with patient-reported improvement, physician-evaluated improvement (photographic comparison of baseline and post-treatment clinical images), and pre- and posttreatment comparison of dermoscopic images using a simple scale.

RESULTS

Out of 17, 5 (29%) patients sustained excellent improvement with >75% reduction of pigmentation. Overall 13 (76%) patients had moderate to excellent improvement, that is, at least 25% or more reduction in pigmentation. The patient-reported improvement, physician-graded improvement, and dermoscopic changes-all three measures showed harmonious overlap. Lightening of the background color and reduction in density and color intensity of pigmented structures was observed on dermoscopy in majority of patients. The treatment was well tolerated with no serious local/systemic adverse effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Modified phenol peels seem effective in reduction of hyperpigmentation of LPP. They are safe and well tolerated. Thorough priming, stringent sun protection and use of post-peel adjuvant topicals boost the peel effect and aid in maintaining the effect for up to a year.

Lichen Planus Pigmentosus: A Clinico-etiological Study

INTRODUCTION

Lichen planus pigmentosus (LPP) is a distinct clinical entity commonly encountered in the Indian population.

AIM

To study the clinicoetiological profile of LPP at a tertiary care hospital.

METHODS

A total of 100 patients with clinically and histopathologically confirmed diagnosis of LPP were included. Demographic details including the age of onset, duration of disease, symptoms, and family history were obtained. History regarding any precipitating factors, cosmetics, drug intake, and associated cutaneous or systemic diseases was taken. Clinical examination of the skin, oral cavity, hair, and nails was carried out.

RESULTS

Of the total 100 patients, 56 (56%) were females and 44 (44%) males with age ranging from 18 to 54 years (mean age - 31.23 years). The duration of disease ranged from 2 to 60 months with a mean of 19.31 months. Cosmetic disfigurement (68%) was the commonest complaint, followed by itching (41%) while, 30% of the patients were asymptomatic. History of topical mustard oil and hair dye application was present in 62% and 48% of the cases each. Other topicals included perfumes (24%), aftershave lotion (36%), and cosmetics (20%). Face (54%) and neck (48%) were the commonest sites affected, followed by upper back (36%), upper limbs, and chest (each 32%). A total of 11 patients showed only flexural involvement. The commonest pattern of pigmentation was diffuse (56%) followed by reticular in 16%. The color of the pigmentation varied from slate grey to brownish-black in varying proportions. A positive association was found between hypothyroidism with diffuse LPP where the P value was <0.001.

CONCLUSION

LPP is a distinct clinical entity caused by diverse etiological factors and shows varied clinical patterns. All the patients should be advised to stop using mustard oil/henna/hair dye/after shave lotions and cosmetics. Hypothyroidism can be considered to be a disease associated with LPP and all the patients should be investigated for the same.

Erythema dyschromicum perstans: A case report and systematic review of histologic presentation and treatment

Objective

Erythema dyschromicum perstans (EDP) can be difficult to diagnose and treat; therefore, we reviewed the literature to assess whether histology can be used to differentiate lichen planus pigmentosus (LPP) from EDP and determine which treatments are the most effective for EDP. We also present a case of a patient who was treated successfully with narrow-band ultraviolet B (NB-UVB).

Methods

A systematic review in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses was conducted up to July 2017 using four databases.

Results

Histologic analyses from the literature reveal a significant percentage of melanophages, lymphocytic infiltrates, and basal vacuolar degeneration in EDP, and a significant histologic overlap with LPP. The review of the literature on treatment outcomes showed that NB-UVB and tacrolimus were effective with minimal side effects. Clofazimine was effective, but demonstrated significant-to-intolerable side effects. Griseofulvin, isotretinoin, and dapsone provided unsatisfactory results as lesions recurred after discontinuation. Lasers were largely ineffective and may cause postinflammatory hyperpigmentation and fibrosis.

Conclusion

A diagnosis of EDP should not be based on histologic findings alone. Clinical history, morphology, and distribution should be used to differentiate EDP and LPP. NB-UVB and tacrolimus are promising treatments for EDP with minimal side effects. This is the first report to our knowledge of sustained resolution of EDP after treatment with NB-UVB at long-term follow-up of 4 years. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings.

The Measurement of Serum Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha Levels in Patients with Lichen Planus

Background:

Lichen planus is a common mucocutaneous inflammatory skin disease with a multifactorial etiology. Cytokines have a key role in its pathogenesis. In our study, we aimed to investigate the relationship between the disease severity and levels of the tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) cytokine which was considered as a primary cytokine that initiates the cytotoxicity.

Materials and Methods:

A total of 34 patients with lichen planus who were 18 year or older and gender-matched healthy controls were included in the study. Serum TNF-α levels were measured by human TNF-α enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay test kits and the values in the two groups were statistically compared.

Results:

The mean serum TNF-α levels were higher in the patient group than that in the control group. Serum TNF-α levels were not associated with oral mucosal involvement and gender. However, it was observed that the level of TNF-α was higher in older ages, both in patient and in control groups.

Conclusion:

It is thought that TNF-α, a proinflammatory cytokine, may have an important role in the pathogenesis of lichen planus.