Frequency, nature, severity and preventability of adverse drug reactions arising from cancer chemotherapy in a teaching hospital

Adverse Events Following Immunization with Novel Oral Polio Vaccine Type 2, and the Experience and Challenges of Reporting in Sierra Leone

Background

The manifestation and spread of neuroinvasive circulating vaccine-derived polioviruses (cVDPVs) across several countries, which led to the emergency use of the novel oral polio vaccine type 2 (nOPV2), raised concerns about adverse events following immunization (AEFI) surveillance. We assessed the attributes of AEFI with nOPV2 and examined stakeholder experiences and challenges in AEFI surveillance in Sierra Leone.

Methods

Using a mixed method approach, we retrospectively reviewed passive data collected during a 2021 immunization campaign, and conducted semi-structured, interviews with vaccinators, district AEFI focal persons, and key stakeholders at the national Expanded Program on Immunization and the National Medicines Regulatory Authority. AEFI were categorized using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) Preferred Terms (PTs) and System Organ Class (SOC). Outcomes were stratified as recovered or not, with preventability and causality assessed using the Schumock and Thornton and World Health Organization (WHO) algorithms, respectively.

Results

A total of 528 suspected AEFI were documented, predominantly affecting children aged 28 days to 23 months (63.3%). Most reported AEFI were administration site conditions and general disorders, with pyrexia being the predominant PT. Of 80 serious cases, 78 recovered, with 74 having an inconsistent causal relationship with the vaccine. Most serious cases (78) were deemed non-preventable, with only two being probably preventable. AEFI reporting was not routinely carried out across the group of people interviewed. AEFI reporting was not consistently performed, with discrepancies in defining reportable events and confusion over responsibility. Challenges with the open data kit (ODK) platform were noted, along with perceived inadequacies in training.

Conclusion

While the nOPV2 is relatively new, the majority of AEFI were not serious, and most serious cases were not causally linked to the vaccine. Participants exhibited variations in experience and awareness of AEFI reporting.

Exploration and Evaluation of Adverse Drug Reactions Documented in a Tertiary-Care Hospital in Chennai: An In-Depth Retrospective Observational Study

INTRODUCTION

 While drugs are intended to benefit patients, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) represent a significant negative outcome of drug consumption. They rank as the sixth leading cause of death among hospitalized patients. Many harmful effects are preventable and can reduce morbidity, mortality, and hospitalization duration. This study is a valuable resource for physicians, aiding in the safe and optimal use of medications.

METHODOLOGY

 This retrospective observational study, conducted at the Pharmacovigilance Center of Saveetha Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, India, received approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee. All adverse drug interactions reported in our hospital from January 2019 to February 2024 were included after screening for inclusion and exclusion criteria. The collected reactions were analyzed, assessed, and evaluated between February 2024 and April 2024. Data on the drugs causing adverse reactions, the types of reactions, and the treatments administered were collected and documented. The reactions were categorized using the Rawlins and Thompson classification, while causality and severity were assessed using the standard Naranjo causality and modified Hartwig and Siegel severity assessment scales.

RESULTS

 During the study, 252 ADRs were documented by the Central Drugs Standard Control Organization. The gender distribution showed 123 cases (48.8%) in males and 129 cases (51.2%) in females, with a higher prevalence in the 20-40 age group. The departmentwise distribution revealed the highest number of ADRs in Obstetrics and Gynecology (60 cases, 24%), followed by General Surgery (52 cases, 21%), General Medicine (44 cases, 17%), Pediatrics (22 cases, 9%), and Emergency Medicine (20 cases, 8%). Antimicrobial drugs constituted the majority of ADRs (149 cases, 59.1%), followed by vitamins and mineral supplements (21 cases, 13.8%), contrast dye (15 cases, 6%), antituberculosis drugs (15 cases, 6%), analgesics (13 cases, 5.2%), and gastrointestinal (GIT) drugs (8 cases, 3.2%). Cefotaxime was the most commonly reported antibiotic (42 cases, 28.2%), followed by Ciprofloxacin (41 cases, 27.5%). Among vitamins and mineral supplements, iron sucrose was implicated in the highest number of ADRs (15 cases, 71.4%). The parenteral route of drug administration showed the highest incidence of ADRs (229 cases, 91%), followed by oral (20 cases, 8%) and topical routes (3 cases, 1%). Dermatological manifestations were most frequently reported (196 cases, 77.8%), followed by GIT symptoms (27 cases, 10.7%), and other manifestations such as shivering, fever, seizures, and dyspnea (29 cases, 11.5%). Based on the Naranjo causality assessment scale, 179 ADRs (71%) were categorized as probable, 55 (22%) as possible, 10 (4%) as certain, and 8 (3%) as doubtful. Approximately 47.2% of ADRs were self-limiting, while 44.1% required symptomatic treatment and 8.7% necessitated aggressive treatment, leading to a prolonged hospital stay or admission to the intensive care unit.

CONCLUSION

 The pattern of ADRs in our hospital aligns with findings from other studies. While many of these reactions are unpredictable and mild, they underscore the importance of raising awareness among clinicians and regulatory authorities to promote safe medication use and prevent potentially serious outcomes.

Drug-related problems among esophageal, gastric and colorectal cancer patients at the National and referral hospital in Kenya

INTRODUCTION

Cancer therapy has remarkable potential for drug-related problems due to the high cytotoxicity and narrow therapeutic index of most anti-neoplastic regimens. However, there is a lack of comprehensive studies on drug-related problems in patients with gastrointestinal cancer in Kenya. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the prevalence, types and predictors of drug-related problems among gastrointestinal cancer patients at Kenyatta National Hospital.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was used to assess the prevalence of drug-related problems among a random sample of 160 esophageal, 103 gastric, and 96 colorectal cancer patients. Data were collected using a researcher-administered questionnaire and data abstraction tool after training the data collectors. Patient-specific details such as socio-demographic features, histological cancer types, cancer stage, comorbidity types, and treatment regimen were recorded after the review of medical records and patient interviews. The potential of drug-related problems was determined as per the standard guidelines. The data were entered and analysed using version 26.0 SPSS statistical software.

RESULTS

Most esophageal (51.9%), gastric (59.2%), and colorectal (62.5%) cancer patients had a high prevalence of drug-related problems. The need for additional drug therapy and adverse drug reactions were the predominant categories of drug-related problems. Most adverse drug reactions identified had possible categories of causality score, mild severity levels, and definitely preventable types of adverse drug reactions among all gastrointestinal cancer patients. Comorbidity and advanced-stage disease were significant predictors of drug-related problems.

CONCLUSIONS

Drug-related problems were prevalent among gastrointestinal cancer patients in our setting. Comorbidity and advanced stages of disease were significant predictors of drug-related problems.

Current Scenario and Future Prospects of Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) Monitoring and Reporting Mechanisms in the Rural Areas of India

BACKGROUND

Pharmacovigilance (PV) deals with the detection, collection, assessment, understanding, and prevention of adverse effects associated with drugs. The objective of PV is to ensure the safety of the medicines and patients by monitoring and reporting all adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with prescribed medicine usage. Findings have indicated that about 0.2- 24% of hospitalization cases are due to ADRs, of which 3.7% of patients have lethal ADRs. The reasons include the number of prescribed drugs, an increased number of new medicines in the market, an inadequate PV system for ADR monitoring, and a need for more awareness and knowledge about ADR reporting. Severe ADRs lead to enhanced hospital stays, increased treatment costs, risk of death, and many medical and economic consequences. Therefore, ADR reporting at its first instance is essential to avoid further harmful effects of the prescribed drugs. In India, the rate of ADR reporting is less than 1%, whereas worldwide, it is 5% due to a need for more awareness about PV and ADR monitoring among healthcare providers and patients. The main objective of this review is to highlight the current scenario and possible futuristic ways of ADR reporting methods in rural areas of India. We have searched the literature using PubMed, Google scholar, Indian citation index to retrieve the resources related to ADR monitoring and reporting in India's urban and rural areas. Spontaneous reporting is the most commonly used PV method to report ADRs in India's urban and rural areas. Evidence revealed that no effective ADR reporting mechanisms developed in rural areas causing underreporting of ADR, thus increasing the threat to the rural population. Hence, PV and ADR reporting awareness among healthcare professionals and patients, telecommunication, telemedicine, use of social media and electronic medical records, and artificial intelligence are the potential approaches for prevention, monitoring, and reporting of ADRs in rural areas.

Evaluation of adverse drug reactions of chemotherapeutic agents used in advanced non-small cell lung cancer - experience from a rural tertiary care institution in North Eastern India

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer is one of the major causes of morbidity and mortality both in developed and developing countries. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are inevitable, albeit unwanted aspects of cancer chemotherapeutic agents used in lung cancer.

AIM AND OBJECTIVES

To determine common ADRs and the severity of ADRs of different chemotherapeutic agents used in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was conducted among purposively selected 160 patients who had undergone chemotherapy for lung carcinoma. Clinical records of NSCLC patients were reviewed and data related to the socio-demographic and clinic-therapeutic profiles of patients were collected. ADRs were graded according to the Common toxicity criteria (CTC) grading. Data analysis was done using the IBM-SPSS software and presented using the principle of descriptive statistics. Relationships between ADRs and drug regimens were determined using Chi-square tests considering a 95% confidence interval and P value ≤ 0.05 as significant.

RESULT

Among 160 patients, 78.8% were males and 21.3% were females. The mean age was 59.15 ± 10.6 years, illness duration was 7.5 ± 10.6 months, and treatment duration was 4.4 ± 0.91 months. The overall mortality rate and systemic toxicity of the paclitaxel-carboplatin combination were the lowest. Almost an equal proportion of moderate to severe changes in parameters such as myelosuppression, anemia, thrombocytopenia, alopecia, skin changes, allergic reaction, and peripheral neuropathy, were observed with all chemotherapeutic regimens. Gemcitabine-carboplatin regimen was associated with a higher proportion of altered liver enzymes, electrolyte imbalance, diarrhea, pleural effusion, and renal toxicities.

CONCLUSION

There was a high prevalence of ADRs with different chemotherapeutic agents. Early detection of these ADRs may help in minimizing the damage by either modifying the dose or changing the offending agent.

An Account of Acute Adverse Drug Reactions Occurring in a Day-Care Chemotherapy Unit of a Tertiary Care Cancer Hospital—A Prospective Observational Study

Introduction Acute adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in day-care chemotherapy are not uncommon and are easily manageable on most occasions. However, sometimes they may lead to untoward events. It is paramount to document and analyze such events in contemporary medical oncology practice for the best utilization and planning of available personnel and resources.

Objective Our objective was to analyze the acute ADRs occurring in day-care cancer chemotherapy settings.

Materials and Methods ADRs reported in a day-care cancer chemotherapy setting, during the administration of chemotherapy, were prospectively observed and analyzed from 01 June 2020 to 31 December 2020. ADRs were classified into anaphylactic, allergic, and gastrointestinal (GI) (nausea/vomiting/heart burns/chest tightness). All ADRs were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 5.0. Suspected drugs, time to reaction, and corrective measures were analyzed.

Results During the study period, a total of 10,120 sessions of day-care chemotherapy were administered. ADRs were noticed in 118 cases (1.18%). Among the reported ADRs, the mean and median age of the patients in this study was 52 years (21–88). Women outnumbered men (n = 81, 68.64% vs n = 37, 31.36%). Anaphylactic reactions (50.92%) were the most common followed by allergic (25.15%) and GI reactions (23.93%). No grade IV reaction was observed. Oxaliplatin-induced allergic reactions (n = 28, 23.73%) were noted most frequently. In majority of sessions (n = 93, 78.81%), the same chemotherapy regimen was readministered and completed uneventfully after the administration of antihypersensitivity medications.

Conclusion Serious ADRs are rare in current day-care chemotherapy administration. Most acute ADRs were of mild grade and successfully managed with antihypersensitivity medication.

Analysis of Adverse Events and Intravenous Iron Infusion Formulations in Adults With and Without Prior Infusion Reactions

IMPORTANCE

Although iron deficiency is common, it remains unclear which iron repletion strategy is associated with the lowest rate of infusion-related adverse events, and how patients with history of infusion reaction should be managed.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate rates of infusion reactions among 4 commonly used intravenous iron repletion strategies and determine how readministration was managed in patients with history of reaction.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This cohort study included all patients receiving intravenous iron infusion from January 1, 2015, to September 7, 2021, at 6 centers in Portland, Oregon. Participants included a total of 12 237 patients with iron deficiency, not restricted by etiology. Statistical analysis was performed from September to October 2021.

EXPOSURES

Type of intravenous iron formulation and concurrent administration of diphenhydramine, epinephrine, famotidine, and/or hydrocortisone, used as surrogate maker of infusion reaction.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Incidence of adverse events, including severe events requiring epinephrine, stratified by type of iron formulation, and in patients who received premedication or with history of infusion-related reaction receiving subsequent doses.

RESULTS

Among 35 737 unique iron infusions (12 237 patients [9480 (77.5%) women; 717 (5.9%) Black; 10 250 (83.7%) White; mean (SD) age of 51 (20) years]), comprising 22 309 iron sucrose doses, 9067 iron dextran total doses (1771 preceded by test dose, 56 test doses alone), 3147 ferumoxytol doses, and 1214 ferric carboxymaltose doses, incidence of adverse events was 3.9% (n = 1389; 95% CI, 3.7%-4.1%). Rate of infusion events differed among iron formulations: 4.3% (n = 970; 95% CI, 4.1%-4.6%) iron sucrose, 3.8% (n = 345, 95% CI: 3.4%-4.2%) iron dextran (test and full doses or test dose alone), 1.8% (n = 57; 95% CI, 1.4%-2.3%) ferumoxytol, and 1.4% (n = 17, 95% CI, 0.8%-2.3%) ferric carboxymaltose (P < .001). Severe adverse events were exceedingly rare with only 2 documented epinephrine administrations, both associated with iron dextran. Incidence of adverse events among those who received premedication was 23-fold higher compared with those who did not (38.6% vs 1.7%, χ21 = 7324.8; P < .001). Among 873 patients with history of infusion reaction who underwent readministration, the majority received the same formulation, which was associated with significantly higher reaction rate particularly if premedication was administered (68% [95% CI, 64%-72%] vs 32% [95% CI, 26%-41%], respectively), compared with those who received an alternate formulation (21% [95% CI, 11%-35%] vs 5% [95% CI, 2%-12%], respectively) (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

These data, and the preponderance of published evidence, suggest that intravenous iron is generally well tolerated with exceedingly low risk of severe reaction, use of premedication and test doses are unnecessary, and that optimal prevention and management of infusion-related reactions warrant further study.