Study of adverse drug reactions to antiretroviral therapy in a tertiary care hospital, Tirupati

Evaluation of Adverse Drug Events in Patients on Anti-Retroviral Therapy Regimen at Omdurman Voluntary Counselling and Testing and Anti-Retroviral Therapy Center in Sudan - A Cross-Sectional Study

Background

Anti-retroviral therapy-related adverse drug events are accounted as a main cause of anti-retroviral therapy non-adherence. In Sudan, pharmacovigilance studies are relatively rare and obstructed by the problem of under-reporting. It is a well-defined issue worldwide and is highly reported in developing countries. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of adverse events associated with anti-retroviral therapy among adult patients with immunodeficiency virus at Omdurman Voluntary Counselling and Testing and Anti-retroviral Therapy Center.

Methods

The study was a descriptive cross-sectional study conducted through direct interviews with 429 patients at the selected center using the Adverse Drug Events (ADEs) reporting form. The collected data were analyzed by The Statistical Package for Social Sciences.

Results

More than half (55.5%) of the participants experienced adverse events, with 48.7% having experienced them at the beginning of treatment. Central nervous system manifestations were the most common adverse events. By using the Naranjo scale, most adverse events showed a "probable" relationship to anti-retroviral medicines. Based on the chi-square test, medication regimen was significantly associated with the presence of ADEs (namely abdominal pain and jaundice) (p values = 0.03 and 0.001), respectively.

Conclusion

This study clearly stated that ART-related ADEs are common among Sudanese PLHIV and with central nervous system being the main adverse events. More pharmacovigilance studies and efforts by healthcare providers should be applied targeting ART-related ADEs under-reporting in Sudanese healthcare facilities.

Adverse Drug Reactions and Prescription Patterns of Antiretroviral Drugs: A Longitudinal Observational Study From a Tertiary Care Hospital in Western India

Background In 2018, the World Health Organisation (WHO) released interim guidelines, advising a change of regimens to dolutegravir-based first- and second-line antiretroviral therapy (ART), based on which, in 2021, the National Aids Control Organisation (NACO) updated its guidelines to include the tenofovir + lamivudine + dolutegravir (TLD) regimen as a first line of therapy for all people living with HIV (PLHIV) and second- and third-line regimens to dolutegravir-based regimens. Considering this change of regimen, the adverse drug reaction (ADR) profiling and longitudinal prescription pattern of antiretroviral and concomitant medications in adult patients at the ART centre of a tertiary care hospital were assessed in this study. Methods Ninety-seven PLHIV out of all the patients who attended the ART centre from September 2021 to July 2022 were enrolled and followed up for six months. The ADRs that occurred during this period were collected along with details of prescription patterns and analyzed by descriptive statistics. Causality assessment for ADR was done using the World Health Organisation-Uppsala Monitoring Centre (WHO-UMC) scale. Results Seventy-eight percent (n=76 out of 97) of patients experienced at least one ADR, and 128 ADRs were seen in 97 patients. The most common ADRs were increased alkaline phosphatase (39.0%, n=128), dyslipidaemia (12.5%, n=128), and nephrotoxicity (10.1%, n=128). The drug most suspected of causing ADRs was dolutegravir (27.5%, n=342). The most common therapeutic regimen was TLD (71.2%, n=97). The most prescribed drug was lamivudine (30.6%, n=1183). The most prescribed concomitant medication was cotrimoxazole (15%, n=312). Conclusions Dolutegravir-based regimens have been implemented for PLHIV in a phased-out manner from previous non-dolutegravir-based ART regimens, which is in line with the recent NACO guidelines. However, it has also led to an increase in dolutegravir-associated ADRs like increased alkaline phosphatase, dyslipidaemia, and nephrotoxicity. Continuous monitoring of prescriptions and ADRs can add to our knowledge regarding their use and ADRs.

Incidence and Predictors of Severe Adverse Drug Reactions among Patients on Antiretroviral Drugs in Harari Regional State, Eastern Ethiopia

Background

The introduction of combination antiretroviral therapy improves the quality and longevity of people living with HIV/AIDS. However, adverse drug reactions associated with antiretroviral therapy compromise the resulting benefits and have been reported differently worldwide, including Ethiopia. Severe adverse drug reactions are one of the major public health concerns for the reason that they can potentially impede the benefit of antiretroviral therapy and put the patient's survival at risk. Despite many successes achieved with the introduction of the combined antiretroviral therapy, the majority of the patients on antiretroviral therapy experience adverse drug reactions associated with the drugs. Consequently, little is known about the problem in the current study area. This is, therefore, to study incidence and predictors of severe adverse drug reactions among patients on antiretroviral drugs in the Harari region, Eastern Ethiopia. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence and predictors of severe adverse drug reactions among patients on antiretroviral therapy from February 25, 2022, to March 25, 2022, in the Harari region, Eastern Ethiopia.

Methods

A hospital-based retrospective cohort study was conducted among 449 randomly selected medical records of people living with HIV on first-line antiretroviral therapy. Collected data were entered into EpiData version 3.1 and exported to STATA version 15 for analysis. Kaplan-Meier survival curve with log-rank test was used to compare survival curves for categorical independent variables. A p value ≤0.05 was declared as significant, and an adjusted hazard ratio was used to report the effect size using the multivariate Cox proportional hazard model.

Result

The overall incidence density of the severe adverse reactions was 7.22 per 1000 months (95% CI: 5.5, 9.6). After adjusting for all potential confounders using multivariable Cox proportional hazard ratio, advanced clinical diseases (AHR = 3.44; 95% CI: 1.54, 7.65), HIV/tuberculosis confections (AHR = 2.38; 95% CI: 1.23, 4.62), and being female (AHR = 3.12; 95% CI: 1.57, 6.18) were significantly associated with the experience of severe adverse drug reactions.

Conclusion

In this study, the incidence of severe adverse reactions was consistent with the previous studies, and advanced World Health Organization (WHO) clinical stage, HIV/TB confection, and being female were the independent predictors of the severe adverse drug reactions.

Adverse drug reactions and correlations with drug–drug interactions: A retrospective study of reports from 2011 to 2020

Introduction: Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) represent a public health problem worldwide that deserves attention due to the impact on mortality, morbidity, and healthcare costs. Drug–drug interactions (DDIs) are an important contributor to ADRs. Most of the studies focused only on potential DDIs (pDDIs), while the detailed data are limited regarding the ADRs associated with actual DDIs.

Methods: This retrospective study evaluated ADRs reported between 2011 and 2020 in a tertiary hospital. The causality and severity of ADRs were evaluated through the Naranjo Algorithm and Hartwig’s scale, respectively. Preventability classification was based on the modified Schoumock and Thornton scale. For ADRs with at least two suspected drugs, pDDIs were identified according to the Lexi-Interact. We further checked whether the ADR description in the reports corresponded to the clinical consequences of the pDDIs.

Results: A total of 1,803 ADRs were reported, of which 36.77% ADRs were classified as mild, 43.26% as moderate, and 19.97% as severe. The assessment of causality showed that the distributions of definite, probable, and possible categories were 0.33%, 58.68%, and 40.99%, respectively. A total of 53.97% of ADRs were identified as preventable ADRs, while 46.03% were recognized as unpreventable. The severity of ADRs was significantly correlated with age, the number of suspected drugs and preventability. Antimicrobial agents were the most common implicated pharmacological group, and the most frequently affected system was the gastrointestinal system. Considering individual drugs, aspirin was the most frequently reported drug. Among 573 ADRs with at least two suspected drugs, 105 ADRs were caused by actual DDIs, of which only 59 and 6 ADRs were caused by actual DDIs in category D and X, respectively. The most frequent drugs involved in actual DDIs of category D were aspirin and heparin, with the majority of ADRs being gastrointestinal bleeding.

Conclusion: This study analyzed the pattern of ADRs in detail and obtained clinical evidence about ADRs associated with actual DDIs. These findings may be useful to compare patterns between different centers and to design preventive strategies for ADRs. Continuous education and training should be provided for physicians regarding the knowledge and recognition of ADRs associated with DDIs.