A Public Health Priority: Disparities in Gynecologic Cancer Research for African-Born Women in the United States

A Cervical Cancer Screening Toolkit for Somali Women: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

This study aims to determine whether a novel cervical cancer screening toolkit will increase rates of pap test completion and HPV vaccination among Somali women living in the United States. We conducted a randomized controlled, pilot trial from June 2021 to February 2022. Somali women aged 21 to 70 were randomized to either receive a toolkit (infographic, video and an in-person health seminar) or not. Health passports confirming a completed pap test and/or HPV vaccination by clinician signature were used to measure outcomes. The primary outcome was pap test completion and the secondary outcome was HPV vaccination. We enrolled 57 participants. Patients randomized to the treatment arm were significantly more likely to have had a pap test (53.7% vs. 3.7%, p < 0.0001) and were also more likely to have received the HPV vaccine (10.7% vs. 3.7%, p = 0.6110). This toolkit increased rates of pap test completion and more participants in the intervention arm received HPV vaccination, though numbers were low. The study design may serve as a reproducible model to determine the effectiveness of patient education materials.

Beliefs associated with cancer screening behaviors among African Americans and Sub-Saharan African immigrant adults: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Beliefs influence cancer screening. However, there are conflicting findings about how belief influence cancer screening among Black adults. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationships between beliefs (religiosity, fatalism, temporal orientation, and acculturation) and cervical, breast, and colorectal cancer screening behaviors among African Americans and sub-Saharan African immigrants.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional survey of 73 African American and 59 English speaking Sub-Saharan immigrant adults recruited from Lexington and surrounding cities in Kentucky. Data collected included sociodemographic variables, cancer screening behaviors, and several instruments that characterize beliefs, including religiosity, fatalism, temporal orientation, and acculturation.

RESULTS

Participants' mean age was 43.73 years (SD = 14.0), 83% were females, and 45% self-identified as sub-Saharan immigrants. Based on eligibility for each screening modality, 64% reported having ever had a Pap test, 82% reported ever having mammogram, and 71% reported ever having a colonoscopy. Higher education (OR = 2.62, 95% CI = 1.43-4.80) and being insured (OR = 4.09, 95% CI = 1.10 - 15.18) were associated with increased odds of cervical cancer screening (pap test), while cancer fatalism (OR = 0.24, 95% CI = 0.07 - 0.88) was associated with decreased odds. Increased age (OR = 1.57, 95% CI = 1.06 - 2.32) and reduced present orientation (OR = 0.42, 95% CI = 0.22 - 0.80) were associated with receipt of a mammogram. Nativity was the only factor associated with colonoscopy screening. Compared to African Americans, sub-Saharan African immigrants were 90% less likely to have had a colonoscopy (OR = 0.10, 95% CI = 0.02 - 0.66).

CONCLUSION

This study contributes to the existing literature by confirming that beliefs are important in cancer screening behaviors among African American and sub-Saharan African immigrants. These findings should inform the development of cancer control and prevention programs for Black adults.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

US National Library of Science identifier NCT04927494. Registered June 16, 2021, www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov.

HPV vaccination uptake among foreign-born Blacks in the US: insights from the National Health Interview Survey 2013-2017

INTRODUCTION

Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination uptake is lower among foreign-born than US-born individuals, but HPV-related (e.g., cervical) cancer risks are disproportionately higher among immigrant populations. Although timely vaccination can help reduce these risks, less is known about differences in the low HPV vaccination uptake among foreign-born groups, especially Black immigrants. The purpose of this study was to examine the differences in HPV vaccination initiation among US- and foreign-born Black men and women.

METHOD

Data from the 2013-2017 National Health Interview Survey on Black adults, aged 18-37 years, were analyzed in 2019. HPV vaccination initiation prevalence among US- and foreign-born blacks by region of birth were examined. Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis was used to examine the relationship between foreign-birth status and HPV vaccination initiation separately among men and women, after adjusting for sociodemographic and health-related factors.

RESULTS

There were significant differences (p < 0.001) in HPV vaccination initiation among Blacks from the US (22.5%), Africa (14.2%), and Americas/Caribbean Islands (11.4%). Adjusted odds of HPV vaccination initiation were lower among foreign- than US-born Blacks (AOR 0.71, CI 0.52, 0.98) but insignificant after controlling for health-related factors. Being ≤ 17 years versus 18-26 years at age of vaccine eligibility (AOR 3.44, CI 2.90, 4.07) was associated with HPV vaccination, and this relationship remained significant among men and women. Being single was associated with vaccination initiation among men, and some college experience, fair/poor health, obstetric/gynecological visit, and pap test were associated with HPV vaccination. Conclusion Cancer prevention strategies to promote HPV vaccination should consider making age-appropriate, gender-specific, and culturally relevant programs among foreign-born blacks in the US. Health insurance is also a key factor that might help with the lower rates of vaccinated black immigrants.

Health Disparities and the Heterogeneity of Blacks/African Americans in the United States: Why Should We Care?

Each year, millions of dollars are spent on research and public health interventions targeted toward reducing health disparities primarily among the "Black/African Americans" community, yet the progress made lags far behind the amount of money and effort spent. We hypothesize that part of the problem is that sociocultural factors play a significant role in disease prevention. Most studies and programs aggregate "Black immigrants" (BIs) and "African Americans" (AAs) as "Black/African American." This categorization assumes that the sociocultural determinants that influence BIs are the same as for AAs. BIs have health and mortality profiles that vary from AAs. This commentary aims to (1) introduce this idea in more depth and provide a brief scope of the problem, (2) provide scientific evidence of noteworthy differences between AAs and BIs in areas of sociodemographics, health behaviors, and health outcomes, (3) discuss implications of considering the Black/AA group as homogeneous and provide recommendations for disaggregation.

Two Peas in a Pod? An Exploratory Examination Into Cancer-Related Psychosocial Characteristics and Health Behaviors Among Black Immigrants and African Americans

Introduction. Most studies lump Black immigrants (BIs) and African Americans (AAs) as "Black/African American" during investigation. Such categorization assumes that the sociocultural determinants that influence BIs are the same as for AAs. This study attempts to disentangle the AA and BI subgroups to recognize the differences in cancer-related psychosocial characteristics and health behaviors. Methods. Merged data from the Health Information National Survey (2011-2017) were used. Two groups were created: those who identified as AA and those who identified as AA but were born outside the United States (BI). Between-group differences were assessed with Mann-Whitney U and chi-square tests. Results. Positive communication patterns with health care providers were significantly higher among AAs (M [mean] = 3.41, SD [standard deviation] = 0.68) compared with BIs (M = 3.28, SD = 0.71) (p = .004). A greater proportion of BIs indicated that their health was excellent (14.2%), compared with AAs (7.9%). AAs reported higher cancer family history (75.1%) than BIs (46.5%). More AAs had smoked at least 100 cigarettes in their lifetime (41.5%) than BIs (16.7%). BIs consumed significantly more fruits each day (M = 2.77, SD = 1.43) than AAs (M = 2.40, SD = 1.44) (p < .001). BIs also reported more physical activity (M = 2.62, SD = 2.15) than AAs (M = 2.37, SD = 2.18) (p = .030). AA women were more likely to have had a pap smear test (M = 2.07, SD = 1.44) compared with BI women (M = 1.73, SD = 1.21) (p = .002). Discussion. Evidence suggests the need to disentangle the "Black/African American" ethnic grouping. Lumping the BI populations together with the AAs, who have been in the United States for generations, may limit the ability to uncover and consequently address culturally driven disease prevention efforts and promote understanding of the biological, environmental, and psychosocial risk factors within Black heterogeneous populations.

Spousal support and knowledge related to cervical cancer screening: Are Sub-Saharan African immigrant men interested?

Sub-Saharan African immigrant (SSAI) men have significant influence on the health-seeking behavior including cervical cancer screening uptake by their female partners/wives. We conducted a qualitative descriptive study with 21 SSAI men to explore knowledge, perceptions, and support related to cervical screening. Participants were aged 36 ± 9 years, college educated (88%), and 53% have lived in the U.S. > 5 years. Three themes emerged; inadequate cervical cancer knowledge, willingness and strategies for support, and shared versus autonomous decision making for screening. Social structure with emphasis on male leadership could be leveraged in cervical cancer screening promotion for SSAI women.