COMMENTARY ON A DIRECT COMPARISON OF THE ATA AND TI-RADS ULTRASOUND SCORING SYSTEMS

The Future of Thyroid Nodule Risk Stratification

Clinical evidence supports the association of ultrasound features with benign or malignant thyroid nodules and serves as the basis for sonographic stratification of thyroid nodules, according to an estimated thyroid cancer risk. Contemporary guidelines recommend management strategies according to thyroid cancer risk, thyroid nodule size, and the clinical scenario. Yet, reproducible and accurate thyroid nodule risk stratification requires expertise, time, and understanding of the weight different ultrasound features have on thyroid cancer risk. The application of artificial intelligence to overcome these limitations is promising and has the potential to improve the care of patients with thyroid nodules.

US-based risk stratification "guidelines" for thyroid nodules: Quō Vādis?

PURPOSE

This rapid scoping review addresses the commentary titled the ACR TI-RADS™: An Advance in the Management of Thyroid Nodules or Pandora's Box of Surveillance? suggesting that the 2017 American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR TI-RADS™-2017) adds to a plethora of existing guidelines, incorporates an inconsistent lexicon, and potentially contradicts recommendations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The author performed a rapid scoping review using a combination of English keywords to identify and review peer reviewed articles contained in electronic databases (e-databases) comparing 2 or more guidelines for managing adult thyroid nodules (GMTNs) with (UGMTNs) and without (non-UGMTNs) ultrasound. E-databases included Medline (PubMed), EBSCO, Google, and Google Scholar published (2010-2019).

RESULTS

The search returned 28 articles, where the author identified 12 different guidelines. Most articles evaluated diagnostic performance (N = 26), not quality (N = 2) measures. The most commonly reviewed UGMTNs were in descending order ATA-2015, ACR TI-RADS™-2017, South Korean, and EU TI-RADS. No article reviewed all GMTNs or identified a generally accepted UGMTNs or non-UGMTNs. Primary origin continents were: North America (U.S.A), Asia (Japan, South Korea, Thailand), Europe (France, Italy, U.K.), and South America (Chile).

CONCLUSION

A plethora of UGMTNs may exist. No guideline enjoys general acceptance and evaluations of performance and quality vary.