Oncologic effects of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with ypT0-2N0 rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and curative surgery: a meta-analysis

The role of adjuvant chemotherapy in rectal cancer patients with ypT0-2N0 after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

Background

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy has emerged as the established treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer. Nevertheless, there remains a debate regarding the necessity of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who exhibit a favorable tumor response (ypT0-2N0) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery. Thus, the objective of this study is to investigate the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on the oncological prognosis of rectal cancer patients who have a good response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

Materials and methods

The study was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses protocol. Articles were searched in the Web of Science, PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases. The primary outcomes assessed were 5-year overall survival, disease-free survival, cancer-specific survival, recurrence-free survival, local recurrence, and distant metastasis. The data was summarized using a random effects model.

Results

A meta-analysis was conducted using 18 retrospective studies published between 2009 and 2023. The studies included 9 from China and 5 from Korea, involving a total of 6566 patients with ypT0-2N0 rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. The pooled data revealed that adjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved 5-year overall survival (OR=1.75, 95% CI: 1.15-2.65, P=0.008), recurrence-free survival (OR=1.73, 95% CI: 1.20-2.48, P=0.003), and reduced distant metastasis (OR=0.68, 95% CI: 0.51-0.92, P=0.011). However, adjuvant chemotherapy did not have a significant effect on disease-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and local recurrence in ypT0-2N0 rectal cancer. Subgroup analysis indicated that adjuvant chemotherapy was beneficial in improving overall survival for ypT1-2N0 rectal cancer (OR=1.89, 95% CI: 1.13-3.19, P=0.003).

Conclusion

The findings of the meta-analysis suggest that adjuvant chemotherapy may provide benefits in terms of oncological outcomes for rectal cancer patients with ypT0-2N0 after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and radical surgery. However, further prospective clinical studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Implication of MRI Risk Stratification System on the Survival Benefits of Adjuvant Chemotherapy After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To investigate the implication of a Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) risk stratification system on the selection of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) who can benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 328 patients with LARC who underwent NCRT and surgery. The median follow-up duration was 79 months (Interquartile range, 66-94 months). Cox logistic regression analysis was used to identify MRI risk factors and develop a risk stratification system to stratify patients into groups with high and low risks. Kaplan-Meier curves of distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and overall survival (OS) were used to show the benefits of ACT and stratify results based on the MRI risk stratification system and postoperative pathological staging.

RESULTS

An MRI risk stratification system was built based on four MRI risk factors, including MRI-identified T3b-T4 stage, N1-N2 stage, extramural venous invasion, and tumor deposits. 74 (22.6%) patients with 3-4 MRI risk factors were classified into the MRI high-risk group. ACT could significantly improve 5-year DMFS (19.2% versus 52.1%; p < 0.001) and OS (34.6% versus 75.0%; p < 0.001) for patients in the MRI high-risk group, while ACT had no survival benefit for patients in the MRI low-risk group. The benefits of ACT were not observed in patients with any pathological staging subgroups (ypT0-2N0, ypT3-4N0, and ypN+).

CONCLUSION

Patients in the MRI high-risk group could benefit from ACT, regardless of postoperative pathological staging. Baseline MRI should be considered more in ACT decision-making.

Comparison between Local Excision and Radical Resection for the Treatment of Rectal Cancer in ypT0-1 Patients: An Analysis of the Clinicopathological Factors and Survival Rates

Tumors with good response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy have a favorable prognosis, and these findings raise interest in rectum-sparing strategies. This study aimed to compare the oncologic outcome between local excision and radical resection in ypT0-1 patients and to analyze prognostic factors. Patients with primary rectal cancer diagnosed with ypT0-1 after PCRT followed by either radical resection (RR) or local excision (LE) between 2005 and 2014 were included in this study (LE = 78, RR = 442). Clinicopathologic features, recurrence-free survival (RFS), and OS were analyzed. There was no statistically significant difference in the RFS and OS between the LE and RR groups. Clinical T stage (cT3-4) before PCRT was related to RFS and in the LE group (p = 0.022). Lymph node metastasis (HR: 4.884, 95% confidence interval: 2.451-9.732, p < 0.001) in the final pathology was the only factor associated with RFS, showing a statistically significant difference in the RR group. Lymph node metastasis and age were associated with OS in the RR group. This study confirms the oncologic feasibility of LE in ypT0-1 rectal cancer after PCRT. Additionally, careful patient selection with higher accuracy modalities should be updated to improve treatment outcomes of LE.

Current evidence regarding the role of adjuvant chemotherapy in rectal cancer patients with pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The aim of this meta-analysis was to investigate the role of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in rectal cancer patients with pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and curative resection.

METHODS

This study was completed in accordance to the PRISMA guidelines and the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. The electronic scholar databases (Medline, Web of Science, Scopus) were screened for eligible articles. The level of evidence (LoE) was assessed using the GRADE methodology.

RESULTS

Overall, 23 non-randomized studies and 17,406 patients were included in the present meta-analysis. Pooled comparisons confirmed that AC improved overall survival (HR: 0.68, p=0.0003), but not disease-free (p=0.22) and recurrence-free survival (p=0.39). However, the LoE for all outcomes was characterized as "very low," due to the absence of RCTs.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering the study limitations and the lack of randomized studies, further high-quality RCTs are required to confirm the findings of our study.