Percutaneous Transpedicular Fixation: Technical tips and Pitfalls of Sextant and Pathfinder Systems

Forcefully engaging rods into tulips with gap discrepancy leading to pedicle screw loosening-a biomechanical analysis using long porcine spine segments

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Long-segment pedicle screw instrumentation is widely used to treat complex spinal disorders. Rods are routinely precontoured to maximize assistance on the correcting side of the deformity, but there often exists a residual gap discrepancy between the precontoured rods and screw tulips. No previous research has investigated the diminished pullout strength of the most proximal or distal pedicle screw resulting from a mismatched rod in long-segment pedicle screw instrumentation.

PURPOSE

The present study aimed to investigate the decreased pullout force of pedicle screws affected by the gap discrepancy when forcefully engaging a mismatched rod into a tulip in a normal-density porcine spine.

STUDY DESIGN

The pedicle screw fixation strength under axial pullout force was compared among three different gap discrepancies between rods and tulips using long porcine spine segments.

METHODS

Twelve porcine lumbar vertebrae (L3-L6) were implanted with pedicle screws and rods. Screws on one side had no gap between the tulip and rod (0-mm group), while the most proximal screw on the other side had an intentional gap of 3 mm (3-mm group) or 6 mm (6-mm group). Three hours after forcefully engaging the rod into the tulips at room temperature, the set screws in all specimens were loosened, and each specimen was dissected into individual vertebrae for subsequent pullout testing.

RESULTS

The control group exhibited significantly greater pullout strength (1987.68 ± 126.80 N) than the groups from different rod-tulip configurations (p<.05), with significantly greater strength in the 3-mm group (945.62 ± 97.43 N) than the 6-mm group (655.30 ± 194.49 N) (p<.05). Only 47.6% and 33.0% of the pullout strength was retained in the 3-mm and 6-mm groups, respectively, compared to the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

Gap discrepancies between rods and tulips can significantly reduce pedicle screw pullout strength, with a correlation between decreased strength and increased gaps. Surgeons should avoid forcefully engaging mismatched rods and consider well-fitted contoured rods in spinal surgery to minimize the risk of screw loosening.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

The gap discrepancy between rod and tulip significantly affected pullout strength, with greater gaps leading to reduced strength. Forcefully engaging mismatched rods into tulips in degenerative spinal surgery should be avoided to minimize the risk of early screw pullout.

The role of counter-torque holders in tightening of pedicle screw-rod constructs: a biomechanical study in a porcine model

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Pedicle screw-rod assembly procedures following pedicle screw insertion include contouring and placing rods into screw tulips, introducing set screws into the tulip along the screw thread, applying a counter-torque holder and tightening all the set screws clockwise. Even if an appropriate pedicle screw is implanted, screw dislodgement after tightening of the tulip and set screw is not uncommon. Pedicle wall violation resulting from excessive rotational force due to inadequate use of a counter-torque holder might be the reason. However, the strain change in the pedicle during tulip-set screw tightening and the role of counter-torque have never been investigated.

PURPOSE

This study determined differences in the strain change in the outer and inner pedicle walls during tulip-set screw tightening; additionally, the influence of counter-torque on pedicle wall violation was elucidated.

STUDY DESIGN

A controlled biomechanical study; the strain values of outer and inner pedicle walls in cadaveric porcine L4-L5 vertebrae during tulip-set screw tightening with or without a counter-torque holder were measured.

METHODS

Twelve L4-L5 fresh-frozen porcine lumbar vertebrae were implanted with screw-rod constructs; the set screw was randomly locked into the tulip in the right L5, right L4, left L5 and left L4 testing groups. The maximal values from eight strain gauges (P-R-O: outer cortex of right pedicle in proximal vertebra; P-R-I: inner cortex of right pedicle in proximal vertebra; D-R-O: outer cortex of right pedicle in distal vertebra; D-R-I: inner cortex of right pedicle in distal vertebra; P-L-O: outer cortex of left pedicle in proximal vertebra; P-L-I: inner cortex of left pedicle in proximal vertebra; D-L-O: outer cortex of left pedicle in distal vertebra; D-L-I: outer cortex of left pedicle in proximal vertebra) for each specimen during tightening to 12 Nm were measured.

RESULTS

The maximal strain values of the ipsilateral strain gauges in all testing groups were almost significantly higher when a counter-torque holder was not used than when one was used. The strain values in the adjacent pedicle of specimens without a counter-torque holder were significantly increased: P-R-O and P-R-I in the right L5 group; D-R-I in the right L4 group; P-L-I and P-L-O in the left L5 group; D-L-O and D-L-I in the left L4 group.

CONCLUSIONS

The constraint effect of counter-torque during tulip-set screw tightening is necessary. Clockwise rotational force with a fragile lateral pedicle wall suggests that caution is required when using a counter-torque holder to tighten the right L5 and left L4 constructs.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

A counter-torque holder is important during tulip-set screw tightening; improper use may lead to adjacent pedicle wall violation, sequentially resulting in pedicle screw loosening.

Assessment of the outcome of percutaneous pedicle screws in management of degenerative and traumatic dorsal and lumbar pathologies

Background

Percutaneous pedicle screw technique is relatively a recent technique that evolved the concept of posterior spinal instrumentation, utilizing familiar fluoroscopic landmarks to guide the procedure of screws insertion, which despite being technically demanding, it avoids the Musculo-ligamentous damage associated with the conventional posterior technique.

Aim of the work

This study aims to report our experience in managing traumatic and degenerative spine pathologies by the minimally invasive percutaneous technique and assessing its radiological and functional outcome.

Materials and methods

A prospective observational study that included the analysis of the functional, operative, biochemical, and radiological outcomes of 20 patients who underwent uniplanar fluoroscopic-guided dorsal and/or lumbar percutaneous pedicle screw fixation procedures with or without fusion using the sextant, longitude, and Spineart system and any reported complications between January 2018 and December 2019.

Results

The clinical and radiological analysis of 100 percutaneous pedicle screws in degenerative (n:11) and traumatic (n:9) dorsal and/or lumbar cases revealed that the biomechanical stabilizing characteristics are comparable to the conventional posterior approach with the added benefits of the paraspinal muscle-sparing. Satisfactory functional outcome represented in the improvement of the postoperative back pain visual analog score and Oswestry Disability Index Score with acceptable morbidity and complications rate was noticed.

Conclusions

Percutanous pedicle screw fixation is a landmark in the evolution of the minimally invasive spine surgery which can be a safe alternative to the conventional posterior muscle stripping technique with a comparable functional and radiological outcome and good biomechanical profile and an acceptable morbidity rate.

Robotic-Navigated Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement Has Less Facet Joint Violation Than Fluoroscopy-Guided Percutaneous Screws

OBJECTIVE

To directly compare robotic-versus fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) placement in thoracolumbar spine trauma with a focus on clinically acceptable pedicle screw accuracy and facet joint violation (FJV).

METHODS

A retrospective chart review assessed 37 trauma patients undergoing percutaneous thoracic and/or lumbar fixation. Postoperative computed tomography images were reviewed by authors blinded to surgical technique who assessed pedicle screw trajectory accuracy and FJV frequency.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients underwent placement of 143 PPS with robotic assistance (robot group), compared with 20 patients receiving 149 PPS using fluoroscopy assistance (control group). Overall, the robot cohort demonstrated decreased FJV frequency of 2.8% versus 14.8% in controls (P = 0.0003). When further stratified by level of surgery (i.e., upper thoracic, lower thoracic, lumbar spine), the robot group had FJV frequencies of 0%, 3.2%, and 3.7%, respectively, compared with 17.7% (P = 0.0209), 14.3% (P = 0.0455), and 11.9% (P = 0.2340) in controls. The robot group had 84.6% clinically acceptable screw trajectories compared with 81.9% in controls (P = 0.6388). Within the upper thoracic, lower thoracic, and lumbar regions, the robot group had acceptable screw trajectories of 66.7%, 87.1%, and 90.7%, respectively, compared with 58.8% (P = 0.6261), 91.1% (P = 0.5655), and 97.6% (P = 0.2263) in controls.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no significant difference in clinically acceptable screw trajectory accuracy between robotic versus fluoroscopy-guided PPS placement. However, the robot cohort demonstrated a statistically significantly decreased FJV overall and specifically within the thoracic spine region. Use of robotic technology may improve radiographic outcomes for a subset of patients or spine surgeries.

Reduce the fractured central endplate in thoracolumbar fractures using percutaneous pedicle screws and instrumentational maneuvers: Technical strategy and radiological outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Traumatic thoracolumbar burst fracture is a common condition without a clear consensus on the best treatment approach. Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF) techniques are widely used in practice, while its ability to correct fracture deformity is relatively weak, especially for the central area of the endplate. In this study, we reported a novel technique to reduce the fractured central endplate in thoracolumbar burst fractures.

METHODS

The new reduction technique uses six percutaneous pedicle screws for the fractured vertebra and its adjacent vertebrae. Pedicle screws implanted in the two adjacent vertebrae were parallel to the superior vertebral endplate, as routinely required. Two monoaxial pedicle screws implanted in the fractured vertebra were placed toward the anteroinferior portion of the fractured vertebral body. After routine instrumentation and ligamentotaxis reduction, the bolt heads of the four screws implanted in the adjacent vertebrae were first tightened, and then the bolt heads of the screws implanted in the fractured vertebra were gradually tighten to elevate the collapsed endplate. A fundamental principle of this technique is to implant the pedicle screw in the fractured vertebra towards the anteroinferior portion of the vertebra in such a way that the angle between the pedicle screw and the rod is oblique on lateral fluoroscopy. As such, when the bolt heads were tightened, the pedicle screws can be swung up to reduce the endplate fragments.

RESULTS

The novel technique was performed in 24 patients with neurologically intact thoracolumbar AO type A3 fractures. The middle vertebral height ratio was significantly improved from 69.7%±7.6% after routine reduction to 85.1%±4.5% postoperatively (p<0.01). No complication was noticed for this new reduction technique. At 6-month follow-up, no significant correction loss of the middle and posterior vertebral height ratios, Cobb angle, and vertebral wedge angle was observed, while 5.8% of correction loss was observed for the anterior vertebral height ratio.

CONCLUSION

The described reduction technique is simple, safe, and effective in reducing the collapsed central endplate in thoracolumbar burst fractures. Such a practical reduction strategy does not need additional medical costs.

20 Tips to Avoid and Handle Problems in the Placement of Percutaneous Pedicle Screws

BACKGROUND

Two-dimensional fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous pedicle screw placement is currently the most widely applied instrumentation for minimally invasive treatment of spinal injuries requiring stabilization. Although this technique has advantages over open instrumentation, it also presents new challenges and specific complications. The objective of this study was to provide recommendations developed from the experience of several spinal surgeons at different minimally invasive spine surgery reference centers to solve specific problems and prevent complications during the learning curve of this technique.

METHODS

An AO Spine Latin America minimally invasive spine surgery study group analyzed the most frequent complications and challenges occurring during the placement of >14,000 two-dimensional fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous pedicle screws at different centers over 15 years. Twenty tips considered most relevant to performing this technique, excluding problems directly related to specific brands of instruments, were presented.

RESULTS

The 20 tips included the following: (1) positioning; (2) clean and painless; (3) fewer x-rays; (4) check the clock; (5) beveled tip; (6) transverse-rib-pedicle; (7) double Jamshidi; (8) hammer the Kirschner wire; (9) bent tip; (10) too loose, too tight; (11) new trajectory; (12) manual control; (13) start over; (14) Kirschner wire first; (15) adhesive drape control; (16) bend the rod; (17) lower rods; (18) freehand inner; (19) posterior fusion; (20) revision.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of these tips might improve performance of this technique and reduce the complications related to percutaneous pedicle screw placement.

Assessment of Clinical Decision Support System Efficiency in Spinal Neurosurgery for Personalized Minimally Invasive Technologies Used on Lumbar Spine

The aim of the study was to assess clinical decision support system (CDSS) in spinal surgery for personalized minimally invasive technologies on lumbar spine.

Materials and Methods

The prospective study involved 59 patients operated on using CDSS based on a personalized surgical algorithm considering patient-specific parameters of lumbar segments. Among them, 11 patients underwent total disk replacement (TDR), 25 and 23 patients had minimally invasive (MI-TLIF) and open (O-TLIF) dorsal rigid stabilization, respectively, according to an original technology. The comparative analysis was carried out using retrospective findings of 196 patients operated on involving TDR (n=42), MI-TLIF (n=79), and O-TLIF (n=75). The efficiency of CDSS medical algorithms was assessed by pain syndrome in the lumbar spine and lower limbs, as well as by patients' functional status on discharge according to ODI, 3 and 6 months after the operation.

Results

The comparison by gender characteristics and anthropometric data revealed no significant intergroup differences among the groups under study (p>0.05). Intergroup analysis of functional status by ODI, pain intensity in lower limbs and lumbar spine showed better clinical outcomes in patients operated using CDSS compared to a retrospective group (p<0.05): 6 months after TDR and O-TLIF, and 3 months after MI-TLIF.

Conclusion

The study findings demonstrated high efficiency of CDSS developed for personalized surgical treatment of patients with degenerative lumbar spine diseases taking into consideration individual biometric parameters of lumbar segments.

Percutaneous screw placement in the lumbar spine with a modified guidance technique based on 3D CT navigation system

Several guidance techniques have been employed to increase accuracy and reduce surgical time during percutaneous placement of pedicle screws (PS). The purpose of our study was to present a modified technique for percutaneous placement of lumbar PS that reduces surgical time. We reviewed 23 cases of percutaneous PS placement using our technique for minimally invasive lumbar surgeries and 24 control cases where lumbar PS placement was done via common technique using Jamshidi needles (Becton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). An integrated computer-guided navigation system was used in all cases. In the technique modification, a handheld drill with a navigated guide was used to create the path for inserting guidewires through the pedicles and into the vertebral bodies. After drill removal, placement of the guidewires through the pedicles took place. The PS were implanted over the guidewires, through the pedicles and into the vertebral bodies. Intraoperative computed tomography was performed after screw placement to ensure optimal positioning in all cases. There were no intraoperative complications with either technique. PS placement was correct in all cases. The average time for each PS placement was 6.9 minutes for the modified technique and 9.2 minutes for the common technique. There was no significant difference in blood loss. In conclusion, this modified technique is efficient and contributes to reduced operative time.

[Facet Fixation Combined with Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Comparative Analysis of Clinical Experience and A New Method of Surgical Treatment of Patients with Lumbar Degenerative Diseases]

Background

For the treatment of patients with degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine the technique of pedicle fixation is widespread, when after open decompression channel structure locking screws are introduced into the vertebral body through the back vertebra legs. We first used a fundamentally new way of fixing the rear using the facet-boards Cage «Facet Wedge», when posterior fixation is done by closing the facet joints with minimally invasive, percutaneous method. We have not found data on the clinical efficacy of facet fixation in scientific literature.

Aims

To compare the clinical efficacy of facet fixation combined with interbody fusion in the treatment of patients with degenerative lumbar spine disease.

Materials and Methods

The study included 145 patients who were divided into 2 groups. The study group with long-term observation included patients (n=100) who underwent a new method for lumbar fixation; the method comprises unilateral or bilateral implantation of titanium Cage «facet Wedge» in the joint space facet joint in combination with the anterior, lateral, and transforaminal interbody fusion. Clinical comparison group (n=45) included retrospectively recruited patients who were performed titanium pedicle screw installation after open decompression and interbody fusion posterior lumbar fixation. Dynamic observation and comprehensive evaluation of the treatment clinical results was carried out for 18 months after surgery.

Results

Cage facet installation technology is quite simple, universal for the stabilization of the rear of the complex after interbody fusion from the front, side, and rear access; and does not require the intraoperative application of expensive high-tech equipment. Comparative analysis of the main group showed significantly better results in terms of the duration of the operation [CG 125 (90; 140) min, the CCG 205 (160; 220) min; p=0.01], the volume of blood loss [CG 80 (70; 120) ml, CCG 350 (300; 550) ml; p=0.008], activation time [CG 2 (1; 2) days, 4 CCG (3; 5) days; p=0.02], length of hospitalization [CG 9 (10; 11) days, the CCG 13 (12; 15) days; p=0.03], the level of pain on a visual analog scale [CG 3 (2; 4) mm, CCG 15 (12; 18) mm; p=0.001], quality of life (by index Oswestry) [CG 8 (6; 8) points, the CCG 23 (20; 28) points, p=0.003], and labor rehabilitation [CG 3 (2; 6) months, CCG 9 (6; 12) months; p=0.0001]. The number of postoperative complications in group 1 was 13%, in the 2nd ― 31,1% (p=0,0012). The new method involves fixing the back with considerably less surgical trauma of paravertebral soft tissue that results in early activation of patients, reduction of stay in hospital period, and better functional recovery of patients.

Conclusions

The application of facet fixation combined with interbody fusion in the treatment of patients with degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine allows achieving the best clinical outcomes and fewer postoperative complications during the short and long-term follow-up if compared with the traditional method of transpedicular stabilization. The combination of low-impact and reliability facet fixation techniques for posterior stabilization of the operated segment creates favorable conditions for the restoration of a functional condition of patients, full social and physical rehabilitation.