Comparison of complications in stroke subjects undergoing early versus standard tracheostomy

Early versus late tracheostomy in stroke-related patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Tracheostomy is an operative intervention for patients who require ventilator assistance while in the intensive care unit (ICU). This study aimed to compare efficacy and safety between early tracheostomy (ET) and late tracheostomy (LT) in stroke patients.

METHODS

Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library were searched for available studies. Stroke-related patients were categorized into ET and LT groups using seven days as the cutoff timepoint. The primary efficacy outcome was mortality; secondary efficacy outcomes were modified Rankin Scores (mRS) obtained at follow up, as well as durations of hospital stay, ICU stay, and ventilator use. Safety outcomes were total complication and ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) incidence.

RESULTS

Nine studies with 3,789 patients were included in the current analysis. No statistical difference in mortality was observed. ET was associated with shorter hospital stay (MD -5.72, 95% CI -9.76 to -1.67), shorter ICU stay (MD -4.77, 95% CI -6.82 to -2.72), and shorter ventilator duration (MD -4.65, 95% CI -8.39 to -0.90); however, no statistically significant difference was found in follow-up mRS scores. Examination of safety measures found the ET group exhibited a lower rate of VAP compared with LT (OR 0.80, 95 % CI 0.68 to 0.93), while no statistical difference was found in total complications.

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis concluded that ET was associated with shorter hospital stay, less time on a ventilator, and lower incidence of VAP. Future studies are warranted to investigate the functional outcomes and the occurrence of complications of ET in stroke patients.

Tracheostomy timing and outcome in critically ill patients with stroke: a meta-analysis and meta-regression

BACKGROUND

Stroke patients requiring mechanical ventilation often have a poor prognosis. The optimal timing of tracheostomy and its impact on mortality in stroke patients remains uncertain. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of tracheostomy timing and its association with reported all-cause overall mortality. Secondary outcomes were the effect of tracheostomy timing on neurological outcome (modified Rankin Scale, mRS), hospital length of stay (LOS), and intensive care unit (ICU) LOS.

METHODS

We searched 5 databases for entries related to acute stroke and tracheostomy from inception to 25 November 2022. We adhered to PRISMA guidance for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Selected studies included (1) ICU-admitted patients who had stroke (either acute ischaemic stroke, AIS or intracerebral haemorrhage, ICH) and received a tracheostomy (with known timing) during their stay and (2) > 20 tracheotomised. Studies primarily reporting sub-arachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) were excluded. Where this was not possible, adjusted meta-analysis and meta-regression with study-level moderators were performed. Tracheostomy timing was analysed continuously and categorically, where early (< 5 days from initiation of mechanical ventilation to tracheostomy) and late (> 10 days) timing was defined per the protocol of SETPOINT2, the largest and most recent randomised controlled trial on tracheostomy timing in stroke patients.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies involving 17,346 patients (mean age = 59.8 years, female 44%) met the inclusion criteria. ICH, AIS, and SAH comprised 83%, 12%, and 5% of known strokes, respectively. The mean time to tracheostomy was 9.7 days. Overall reported all-cause mortality (adjusted for follow-up) was 15.7%. One in five patients had good neurological outcome (mRS 0-3; median follow-up duration was 180 days). Overall, patients were ventilated for approximately 12 days and had an ICU LOS of 16 days and a hospital LOS of 28 days. A meta-regression analysis using tracheostomy time as a continuous variable showed no statistically significant association between tracheostomy timing and mortality (β = - 0.3, 95% CI = - 2.3 to 1.74, p = 0.8). Early tracheostomy conferred no mortality benefit when compared to late tracheostomy (7.8% vs. 16.4%, p = 0.7). Tracheostomy timing was not associated with secondary outcomes (good neurological outcome, ICU LOS and hospital LOS).

CONCLUSIONS

In this meta-analysis of over 17,000 critically ill stroke patients, the timing of tracheostomy was not associated with mortality, neurological outcomes, or ICU/hospital LOS.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO-CRD42022351732 registered on 17th of August 2022.

Early versus standard tracheostomy in ventilated patients in neurosurgical intensive care unit: A randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Tracheostomy is performed in patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation, who suffered catastrophic neurologic insult or upper airway obstruction. Thus far, there is no consensus on the optimal timing in performing a tracheostomy. This study aims to test whether early tracheostomy in mechanically ventilated patients in a neurosurgical setting would be associated with a shorter time of mechanical ventilation as compared to standard tracheostomy.

METHODS

This single-center prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted at University Malaya Medical Centre from July 2019 to July 2021. The likelihood of prolonged ventilation was determined objectively using the TRACH score and the patient's clinical presentation. The outcomes measured were days of mechanical ventilation post-tracheostomy, days of neuro-intensive care unit stay, and days of hospital stay. Tracheostomy-related complications were collected. The data collected were analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 25 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

RESULTS

In all, 39 patients were randomly assigned. Of these, 20 were allocated to the early tracheostomy group (ET) and 19 were allocated to the standard tracheostomy group (ST). The demographic characteristics were similar between the groups. The primary outcome, mean (SD) days of mechanical ventilation post-tracheostomy, was statistically different in the 2 groups- early 11.9 (9.3) days, standard 18.9 (32.5) days; p = 0.014. There were comparable tracheostomy-related complications in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Early tracheostomy is associated with a shorter duration of mechanical ventilation in a neurosurgical intensive care unit setting.

Early versus late tracheostomy in patients with acute brain injury: Importance of SET score

Introduction:

Patients with acute brain injury presents are unique subset of neurocritical care patients with its long-term functional prognosis difficult to determine. They often have long intensive care unit (ICU) stay and presents as challenge to decide when to transfer out of ICU. This prospective study aims to assess the benefits of early tracheostomy in terms of ICU-length of stay (ICU-LOS), number of days on ventilator (ventilator days), incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), and mortality rates.

Materials and Methods:

After institutional ethical clearance, 80 patients were randomized into two groups: Group A, early tracheostomy group (tracheostomy within 3 days of intubation) and Group B, standard of care group (tracheostomy after 10 days of intubation: late tracheostomy). A cutoff of 10 in the SET score was used in predicting need of early tracheostomy; both groups were compared with respect to ICU-LOS, number of ventilator days (ventilation time), need of analgesia and sedation, incidence of VAP, and mortality data.

Results:

Both the groups were comparable in terms of demographic profile and various disease severity scores. ICU-LOS was 14.9 ± 3.6 days in Group A and 17.2 ± 4.6 in Group B. The number of days on ventilator and incidence of VAP was significantly lower in Group A as compared to Group B. There was significantly lower mortality in Group A subset of patients in ICU.

Conclusion:

SET score is a simple and reliable score with fair accuracy and high sensitivity and specificity in predicting need of tracheostomy in neurocritical patients. A cutoff of 10 in the score can be reliably used in predicting need of early tracheostomy as in few other studies. Early tracheostomy is clearly advantageous in neurocritical patients, but has no advantage in terms of long-term mortality rates.

New Device Makes Tracheostomy Dressing Changes Easier and More Comfortable

PURPOSE

This study compared the use of the tracheostomy dressing applicator (TDA) to the standard procedure for tracheostomy dressing changes.

DESIGN

A prospective quasi-experimental study was performed.

METHODS

Nineteen patients and 117 nurses answered a survey after changing the tracheostomy dressing with the TDA and using standard procedure.

FINDINGS

Nurses rated the TDA easier to use in patients with average-sized necks and more favorably on observed discomfort in patients with average-sized and larger necks. Patients rated less discomfort with the TDA compared with the standard method of dressing change.

CONCLUSION

The TDA is an effective device to facilitate tracheostomy dressing changes, possibly improving compliance and decreasing skin complications.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The TDA is a useful device that can improve efficiency of dressing changes with the potential to save time and improve outcomes.

Timing and Outcomes of Tracheostomy in Patients with Hemorrhagic Stroke

OBJECTIVE

In the present study, we sought to evaluate the timing and outcomes in patients with hemorrhagic stroke who received tracheostomy.

METHODS

A retrospective database search was undertaken to identify patients with hemorrhagic stroke between January 2010 and December 2018. Clinical data on basic demographics, clinical features, and outcomes were extracted. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality and secondary outcomes were hospital stays and hospital costs. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to compare the characteristics and outcomes between patients with hemorrhagic stroke who underwent tracheostomy early (days 1-6) and late (days 7 or later).

RESULTS

A total of 425 patients were identified, 74.4% (n = 316) received an early tracheostomy during the hospitalization. Patients with hemorrhagic stroke who received early tracheostomy had a higher rate of neurosurgical operation (odds ratio, 2.77; 95% confidence interval, 1.54-4.99; P = 0.001) and different types of hemorrhagic stroke (P = 0.001) in comparison with the late tracheostomy patients. In addition, early tracheostomy was associated with shorter hospital stays (odds ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.03; P = 0.003) and reduced hospital costs (P < 0.001) than with late tracheostomy. However, no significant difference was observed with regard to in-hospital mortality between early and late tracheostomy groups (P = 0.744).

CONCLUSIONS

In our cohort, early tracheostomy in patients with hemorrhagic stroke may help reduce hospital stays and hospital costs, but not in-hospital mortality. Future prospective multicenter studies are warranted to validate these findings.

Early versus late tracheostomy after decompressive craniectomy for stroke

Background

Stroke patients requiring decompressive craniectomy are at high risk of prolonged mechanical ventilation and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Tracheostomy placement may reduce the duration of mechanical ventilation. Predicting which patients will require tracheostomy and the optimal timing of tracheostomy remains a clinical challenge. In this study, the authors compare key outcomes after early versus late tracheostomy and develop a useful pre-operative decision-making tool to predict post-operative tracheostomy dependence.

Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected registry data. We developed a propensity-weighted decision tree analysis to predict tracheostomy requirement using factors present prior to surgical decompression. In addition, outcomes include probability functions for intensive care unit length of stay, hospital length of stay, and mortality, based on data for early (≤ 10 days) versus late (> 10 days) tracheostomy.

Results

There were 168 surgical decompressions performed on patients with acute ischemic or spontaneous hemorrhagic stroke between 2010 and 2015. Forty-eight patients (28.5%) required a tracheostomy, 35 (20.8%) developed VAP, and 126 (75%) survived hospitalization. Mean ICU and hospital length of stay were 15.1 and 25.8 days, respectively. Using GCS, SOFA score, and presence of hydrocephalus, our decision tree analysis had 63% sensitivity and 84% specificity for predicting tracheostomy requirement. The early group had fewer ventilator days (7.3 versus 15.2, p < 0.001) and shorter hospital length of stay (28.5 versus 44.4 days, p = 0.014). VAP rates and mortality were similar between the two groups. Withdrawal of treatment interventions shortly post-operatively confounded mortality outcomes.

Conclusion

Early tracheostomy shortens duration of mechanical ventilation and length of stay after surgical decompression for stroke, but it did not impact mortality or VAP rates. A decision tree is a practical tool that may be helpful in guiding pre-operative decision-making with patients’ families.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s40560-017-0269-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Early tracheostomy in ventilated stroke patients: Study protocol of the international multicentre randomized trial SETPOINT2 (Stroke-related Early Tracheostomy vs. Prolonged Orotracheal Intubation in Neurocritical care Trial 2)

BACKGROUND

Tracheostomy is a common procedure in long-term ventilated critical care patients and frequently necessary in those with severe stroke. The optimal timing for tracheostomy is still unknown, and it is controversial whether early tracheostomy impacts upon functional outcome.

METHOD

The Stroke-related Early Tracheostomy vs. Prolonged Orotracheal Intubation in Neurocritical care Trial 2 (SETPOINT2) is a multicentre, prospective, randomized, open-blinded endpoint (PROBE-design) trial. Patients with acute ischemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage or subarachnoid hemorrhage who are so severely affected that two weeks of ventilation are presumed necessary based on a prediction score are eligible. It is intended to enroll 190 patients per group (n = 380). Patients are randomized to either percutaneous tracheostomy within the first five days after intubation or to ongoing orotracheal intubation with consecutive weaning and extubation and, if the latter failed, to percutaneous tracheostomy from day 10 after intubation. The primary endpoint is functional outcome defined by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS, 0-4 (favorable) vs. 5 + 6 (unfavorable)) after six months; secondary endpoints are mortality and cause of mortality during intensive care unit-stay and within six months from admission, intensive care unit-length of stay, duration of sedation, duration of ventilation and weaning, timing and reasons for withdrawal of life support measures, relevant intracranial pressure rises before and after tracheostomy.

CONCLUSION

The necessity and optimal timing of tracheostomy in ventilated stroke patients need to be identified. SETPOINT2 should clarify whether benefits in functional outcome can be achieved by early tracheostomy in these patients.