Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with morbid obesity: a multicentre propensity score-matched analysis

Outcomes of Surgical Versus Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Obese Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has been increasingly preferred over surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) for treating patients with severe aortic stenosis and intermediate to high surgical risk. Recent studies have indicated that obesity may confer protective benefits in cardiac surgery, known as the obesity paradox. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore how obesity influences outcomes of TAVI versus SAVR. We searched and reviewed relevant studies comparing TAVI and SAVR in obese patients with aortic stenosis indexed in PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases. Data from 5 studies with 16,161 patients (TAVI, n = 2951; SAVR, n = 13,210) were included. There was a lower incidence of postprocedural in-hospital mortality [risk ratio (RR), 0.64; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.41-0.98; P = 0.04], acute kidney injury (RR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.38-0.73; P = 0.0001), and shorter duration of in-hospital stay (mean difference: -3.35; 95% CI, -4.93 to -1.76; P = 0.0001) in TAVI versus SAVR. There was no significant difference in the risk of postoperative stroke (RR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.29-3.02; P = 0.91), major bleeding (RR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.47-1.07; P = 0.10), and myocardial infarction (RR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.39-1.06; P = 0.08) between TAVI and SAVR. Higher incidences of PPM implantation (RR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.38-2.90; P = 0.0003) and major vascular complications (RR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.01-2.27; P = 0.05) were observed with TAVI. In obese patients, TAVI offers similar results as in the general population when compared with SAVR, except for increased vascular complications. An individualized approach can lead to optimal outcomes in this subpopulation.

Obesity and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Amidst an aging population and escalating obesity prevalence, elucidating the impact of obesity on transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) outcomes becomes paramount. The so-called "obesity paradox"-a term denoting the counterintuitive association of obesity, typically a risk factor for cardiovascular diseases, with improved survival outcomes in TAVR patients relative to their leaner or normal-weight counterparts-merits rigorous examination. This review comprehensively investigates the complex relationship between obesity and the clinical outcomes associated with TAVR, with a specific focus on mortality and periprocedural complications. This study aims to deepen our understanding of obesity's role in TAVR and the underlying mechanisms of the obesity paradox, thereby optimizing management strategies for this patient demographic, tailored to their unique physiological and metabolic profiles.

In-hospital outcomes following percutaneous versus surgical intervention in the treatment of aortic stenosis and concomitant coronary artery disease

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Concomitant coronary artery disease (CAD) is prevalent among aortic stenosis patients; however the optimal therapeutic strategy remains debated. We investigated periprocedural outcomes among patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation with percutaneous coronary intervention (TAVI/PCI) vs surgical aortic valve replacement with coronary artery bypass grafting (SAVR/CABG) for aortic stenosis with CAD.

METHODS

Using discharge data from the Spanish National Health System, we identified 6194 patients (5217 SAVR/CABG and 977 TAVI/PCI) between 2016 and 2019. Propensity score matching was adjusted for baseline characteristics. The primary outcome was in-hospital all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were in-hospital complications and 30-day cardiovascular readmission.

RESULTS

Matching resulted in 774 pairs. In-hospital all-cause mortality was more common in the SAVR/CABG group (3.4% vs 9.4%, P <.001) as was periprocedural stroke (0.9% vs 2.2%; P=.004), acute kidney injury (4.3% vs 16.0%, P <.001), blood transfusion (9.6% vs 21.1%, P <.001), and hospital-acquired pneumonia (0.1% vs 1.7%, P=.001). Permanent pacemaker implantation was higher for matched TAVI/PCI (12.0% vs 5.7%, P <.001). Lower volume centers (< 130 procedures/y) had higher in-hospital all-cause mortality for both procedures: TAVI/PCI (3.6% vs 2.9%, P <.001) and SAVR/CABG (8.3 vs 6.8%, P <.001). Thirty-day cardiovascular readmission did not differ between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large contemporary nationwide study, percutaneous management of aortic stenosis and CAD with TAVI/PCI had lower in-hospital mortality and morbidity than surgical intervention. Higher volume centers had less in-hospital mortality in both groups. Dedicated national high-volume heart centers warrant further investigation.