The future importance of devices from emerging countries: the butterfly effect

One-year clinical outcomes of different coronary drug eluting stents-Data from a prospective registry

We compared one-year clinical outcomes of different drug eluting stents (DES) used in a prospective observation registry maintained in two hospitals over three years. The primary endpoint was combination of all-cause mortality, stent thrombosis and revascularization. There was no significant difference among different DES. We grouped DES into well-evaluated Imported DES (Imported group), which used to be expensive prior to price control and economical Indian DES (Indigenous group) that lack supportive clinical trials. One-year follow-up data was available in 99% of Indigenous group (n=1856) and 98.5% of Imported group (n=1539). After propensity score matching, there were 1310 matched pairs. There was no significant difference between two groups in the primary end-point or each of the components.

Are western guidelines good enough for Indians? My name is Borat

Physicians in an attempt to give their patients the best possible care need to be updated on the evolving body of scientific research, trials, case reports, and combine this evidence with their own clinical experience keeping in mind each individual patient's circumstances and preferences. To address this felt need, guidelines are systematically developed statements designed to help clinicians make management decisions. While a multitude of guidelines are available from developed world they might not exactly fit into developing world context. Thus a host of fresh guidelines might be required to fill this void or the existing guidelines modified (supplemented, altered or deleted) to be relevant to this part of the world.