1
|
Murad V, Glicksman RM, Berlin A, Santiago A, Ramotar M, Metser U. Association of PSMA PET-derived Parameters and Outcomes of Patients Treated for Oligorecurrent Prostate Cancer. Radiology 2023; 309:e231407. [PMID: 38051188 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.231407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/07/2023]
Abstract
Background Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET is useful in the early detection of oligorecurrent prostate cancer (PCa), but whether PSMA PET parameters can be used to identify patients who would benefit from metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) with radiation or surgery remains uncertain. Purpose To assess the association of PSMA PET parameters with outcomes of patients with oligorecurrent PCa after MDT. Materials and Methods In this retrospective analysis of a single-center phase II trial that enrolled patients with biochemical recurrence of PCa after maximal local therapy and with no evidence of disease at conventional imaging, patients underwent PSMA PET (between May 2017 and November 2021), and unveiled recurrences were treated with MDT. Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and mean standardized uptake value (SUVmean) and PSMA tumor volume derived using thresholds of 2.5 (SUVmean2.5) and 41% (SUVmean41%), respectively, were recorded for sites of recurrence on PSMA PET scans, and a molecular imaging PSMA score was assigned. These parameters were also corrected for smooth filter and partial volume effects, and the PSMA score was reassigned. Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the relationship between PSMA PET parameters and outcomes. Results A total of 74 men (mean age, 68.3 years ± 6.6 [SD]) with biochemical recurrence of PCa were included. PSMA PET revealed 145 lesions in the entire cohort, of which 125 (86%) were metastatic lymph nodes. Application of the correction factor changed the PSMA score in 88 of 145 lesions (61%). Mean SUVmax, SUVmean2.5, and SUVmean41% were associated with lower risk of biochemical progression (hazard ratio [HR] range, 0.77-0.95; 95% CI: 0.61, 1.00; P = .03 to P = .04). For corrected parameters, mean SUVmax, mean SUVmean2.5, mean SUVmean41%, mean PSMA score, maximum SUVmean2.5, maximum SUVmean41%, and maximum PSMA score were associated with a lower risk of biochemical progression (HR, 0.61-0.98; 95% CI: 0.39, 1.00; P = .01 to P = .04). Conclusion Measured and corrected PSMA PET parameters were associated with biochemical progression in men with oligorecurrent PCa treated with MDT. Clinical trial registration no. NCT03160794 © RSNA, 2023 See also the editorial by Civelek in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vanessa Murad
- From University Medical Imaging Toronto, Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital and Women's College Hospital, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University Ave, Suite 3-920, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2M9 (V.M., U.M.); Department of Medical Imaging (V.M., U.M.), Department of Radiation Oncology (R.M.G., A.B., M.R.), and TECHNA Institute, University Health Network (A.B., U.M.), University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; and Radiation Medicine Program (R.M.G., A.B.) and Department of Biostatistics (A.S.), Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Rachel M Glicksman
- From University Medical Imaging Toronto, Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital and Women's College Hospital, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University Ave, Suite 3-920, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2M9 (V.M., U.M.); Department of Medical Imaging (V.M., U.M.), Department of Radiation Oncology (R.M.G., A.B., M.R.), and TECHNA Institute, University Health Network (A.B., U.M.), University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; and Radiation Medicine Program (R.M.G., A.B.) and Department of Biostatistics (A.S.), Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Alejandro Berlin
- From University Medical Imaging Toronto, Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital and Women's College Hospital, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University Ave, Suite 3-920, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2M9 (V.M., U.M.); Department of Medical Imaging (V.M., U.M.), Department of Radiation Oncology (R.M.G., A.B., M.R.), and TECHNA Institute, University Health Network (A.B., U.M.), University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; and Radiation Medicine Program (R.M.G., A.B.) and Department of Biostatistics (A.S.), Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Anna Santiago
- From University Medical Imaging Toronto, Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital and Women's College Hospital, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University Ave, Suite 3-920, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2M9 (V.M., U.M.); Department of Medical Imaging (V.M., U.M.), Department of Radiation Oncology (R.M.G., A.B., M.R.), and TECHNA Institute, University Health Network (A.B., U.M.), University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; and Radiation Medicine Program (R.M.G., A.B.) and Department of Biostatistics (A.S.), Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Matthew Ramotar
- From University Medical Imaging Toronto, Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital and Women's College Hospital, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University Ave, Suite 3-920, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2M9 (V.M., U.M.); Department of Medical Imaging (V.M., U.M.), Department of Radiation Oncology (R.M.G., A.B., M.R.), and TECHNA Institute, University Health Network (A.B., U.M.), University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; and Radiation Medicine Program (R.M.G., A.B.) and Department of Biostatistics (A.S.), Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Ur Metser
- From University Medical Imaging Toronto, Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital and Women's College Hospital, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University Ave, Suite 3-920, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2M9 (V.M., U.M.); Department of Medical Imaging (V.M., U.M.), Department of Radiation Oncology (R.M.G., A.B., M.R.), and TECHNA Institute, University Health Network (A.B., U.M.), University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; and Radiation Medicine Program (R.M.G., A.B.) and Department of Biostatistics (A.S.), Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
van der Sar ECA, Viol SLM, Braat AJAT, van Rooij R, Lam MGEH, de Jong HWAM, de Keizer B. Impact of uptake time on image quality of [ 68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT. Med Phys 2023; 50:7619-7628. [PMID: 37093883 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2022] [Revised: 03/25/2023] [Accepted: 04/05/2023] [Indexed: 04/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND With the introduction of prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT, the detection rate of prostate cancer metastases has improved significantly, both for primary staging and for biochemical recurrence. EANM/SNMMI guidelines recommend a 60 min time interval between [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA administration and acquisition. PURPOSE This study evaluates the possibility of a shorter time interval by investigating the dynamic change in image quality measures. METHOD We retrospectively analyzed 10 consecutive prostate cancer patients who underwent a dynamic whole body [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT of 75 min from skull vertex to mid-thigh using Siemens FlowMotion. PET images were acquired directly after injection of 1.5 MBq/kg [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11. Image quality measures included lesion maximum standardized uptake value corrected for lean body mass (SULmax ), tumor-to-background ratio (TBR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Quantitative analysis of image quality in dynamic PET was performed using PMOD (version 4.2). Regions of interest (ROIs), drawn included different types of prostate lesions (primary tumor, lymph nodes, and bone metastasis), organ tissue (liver, spleen, lacrimal gland, submandibular gland, parotid gland, urinary bladder, kidneys blood pool [ascending aorta], left ventricle), bone tissue (4th lumbar vertebral body [L4]) and muscle tissue (gluteus maximus). To further investigate image quality four 10 min multi-frame reconstructions with clinical parameters were made at different post-injection times (15, 30, 45, and 60 min). A nuclear medicine physician performed a blinded lesion detectability evaluation on these multi-frame reconstructions for different prostate cancer lesions. RESULTS Six primary prostate tumors in seven patients with prostate in situ, 13 lymph node metastases in six patients and up to 12 bone metastases in three patients were found. The different prostate lesion types (lymph nodes metastases, bone metastases, and primary prostate tumor) all show an increase in average SULmax , TBR, and CNR over time during the scan. The normalized average SULmax , TBR, and CNR of the combined prostate lesions at 15, 30, and 45 min post-injection scans were all significant p < 0.05 lower from the 60 min post-injection [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT (9.5 ± 4.5, 12.7 ± 6.2, and 41.8 ± 24.5, respectively). At patient level, the reader concluded the same regarding the presence/absence of primary prostate cancer recurrence, lymph node metastases, and/or bone metastases on all <60 min post-injection [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT's in comparison to the reference scan (60 min post-injection). At lesion level, all bone metastases seen on the reference scan were also seen on all <60 min post-injection [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT's but there were some lymph nodes (n = 2) metastases missed on the 15, 30, and 45 min post-injection scans. One lymph node metastasis on both the 15 and 30 min post-injection [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT's was missed and one lymph node metastasis was missed, only on the 45 min post-injection [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT. CONCLUSION Shorter post-injection times (15, 30, and 45 min) compared to the recommended post-injection time of 60 min are not optimal. However, the impact of a shorter time interval of 45 min instead of 60 min between [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 administration and the start of PET/CT acquisition on both image quality (SULmax , TBR, and CNR) and lesion detection, while significant, is small.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esmée C A van der Sar
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Sebastiaan L Meyer Viol
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Arthur J A T Braat
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Rob van Rooij
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marnix G E H Lam
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Hugo W A M de Jong
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Bart de Keizer
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|