Antibiotic Susceptibility Profiling of Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Bacterial Isolates in a Tertiary Care Hospital: Establishment of an Antibiogram

Introduction Antimicrobial resistance poses a significant global healthcare challenge in the management of bacterial infections, which is frequently attributed to rapid bacterial adaptations. This study aims to develop an antibiogram for a tertiary care hospital, providing comprehensive antibiotic sensitivity profiles for Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. It informs healthcare providers of antibiotic resistance trends, enabling informed treatment decisions and enhanced infection control measures. Methods We conducted a six-month prospective observational study, during which we gathered and analyzed data from the microbiology laboratory to identify patterns of antimicrobial sensitivity. Subsequently, the data underwent analysis and interpretation using the respected WHONET software, a readily available tool designed for this specific task. Our methodology adhered to the guidelines established by the Clinical & Laboratory Standards Institute for the standardization of antibiogram generation procedures, and these guidelines are easily integrated into the WHONET software for analytical purposes. Results There were a total of 357 isolates across various hospital departments, comprising 13 distinct bacterial species. Among them, nine were identified as Gram-negative bacteria, accounting for 262 (73.3%) isolates. Escherichia coli accounted for 131 (36.6%) isolates, while Klebsiella accounted for 62 (17.3%), emerging as the predominant species among them. The remaining four bacterial species were identified as Gram-positive bacteria, totaling 95 (26.6%) isolates, with Staphylococcus aureus being the most frequently isolated species at 51 (14.2%), followed by Enterococcus at 26 (7.2%). Subsequent analysis using the WHONET software facilitated the creation of an antibiogram. Among the Gram-negative bacteria, E. coli displayed high sensitivity (100%) to aztreonam and clindamycin, followed by nitrofurantoin (98%), imipenem (94%), and meropenem (95%). However, it exhibited decreased sensitivity to ampicillin (25%), cefuroxime (34%), and ceftriaxone (39%). Conversely, among the Gram-positive bacteria, S. aureus demonstrated 100% sensitivity to ampicillin, amoxiclav, cefazolin, teicoplanin, linezolid, rifampicin, nitrofurantoin, and cefotaxime. However, it exhibited zero sensitivity to vancomycin and only 6% sensitivity to cotrimoxazole. Conclusion This study advances the understanding of antibiotic susceptibility in a tertiary care setting and provides an invaluable tool for optimizing treatment strategies, enhancing infection control measures, and combating antibiotic resistance.

Similarities in Bacterial Uropathogens and Their Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profile in Diabetics and Their Non-Diabetic Caregivers at a National Diabetes Management and Research Centre, Accra-Ghana

BACKGROUND

Diabetes mellitus has some damaging effects on the genitourinary system and has been found to have adverse effects on the host immune system, resulting in higher risk of infections including urinary tract infections (UTI). Incidences of UTI caused by bacteria have been increasingly reported globally and the abuse of antibiotics leading to evolving resistant strains of antibiotics is a public health challenge for the management of this condition. Information on the difference in types of bacterial agents causing UTI in diabetic patients and non-diabetic individuals, and their susceptibility profiles, will facilitate effective management among these groups of patients. Therefore, this study aimed at determining the difference in prevalence of UTI, the causative bacteria, and their antimicrobial susceptibility profiles in diabetic patients and non-diabetic individuals at a diabetes management center.

METHODS

This was a prospective cross-sectional study conducted amongst 100 diagnosed diabetic patients and 100 non-diabetic individuals. Urine sample was collected aseptically and analyzed microbiologically for the presence of urinary tract bacterial pathogens. Drug susceptibility testing was conducted on the isolates by the Kirby Bauer method to ascertain the antibiotic susceptibility patterns.

RESULTS

Among the diabetic and non-diabetic individuals, urinary tract bacterial pathogens were observed in 28.0% and 26.0% of samples, respectively. The organisms were in the following proportions for diabetic and non-diabetic individuals, respectively: E. coli (14/28, 50% and 8/26, 30.7%), S. aureus (2/28, 7.1% and 4/26, 15.4%), K. pneumoniae (4/28, 14.3% and 8/26, 30.7%), K. ozoenae (2/28, 7.14% and 0/26, 0%), K. oxytoca (0/28, 0% and 4/26, 15.4%) and C. urealyticum (6/28, 21.4% and 2/26, 7.69%). The difference between the proportions of bacteria isolated was, however, not statistically significant (p-value = 0.894). Bacteria isolated from both diabetic and non-diabetic individuals were highly susceptible to most of the antibiotics tested, especially nitrofurantoin, cefuroxime, ceftriaxone, and cefotaxime.

CONCLUSION

This study has shown that similarities exist in prevalence of UTI, the causative bacteria, and their antimicrobial susceptibility patterns amongst diabetic patients and non-diabetic individuals at a diabetes management center. These data will help in the management of UTI among these individuals.

Rapid emergence of antibacterial resistance by bacterial isolates from patients of gynecological infections in Punjab, Pakistan

BACKGROUND PROBLEM

Antibiotic resistance is considered a global problem, where highly emerging antibacterial resistance is posing a great threat to treat infections.

OBJECTIVES

The present study is aimed to highlight emerging resistance of bacteria to commonly used antibiotics in Pakistan.

METHODS

The samples for bacterial culture were obtained using high vaginal swabs (HVS) from female genitalia. The specimens were incubated and identified for subsequent pathogenic bacterial growth. There were 370 bacterial isolates from 520 females provisionally diagnosed for gynecological infections.

RESULTS

Out of total 9 isolated bacteria, Escherichia coli were most common isolates (41.6%) followed by Staphylococcus aureus (15.4%), and coagulase negative staphylococci (12.2%). E. coli exhibited maximum susceptibility to meropenem (98.2%) and imipenem (97.7%) and least to amoxicillin (9.8%) and ampicillin (9.6%). The highest incidence of bacterial infection was found in age group of 26-35 years. Among Gram-positive bacteria, 98.7%, 88.2% and 81.3% were susceptible to vancomycin, cefuroxime and linezolid respectively. For Gram-negative bacteria, 94.3%, 93.6% were susceptible to cefoperazone/sulbactam and meropenem respectively. Recurrence of infection developed among 3.27% of the patients, while two patients died with the infection.

CONCLUSION

Maximum resistance was shown by co-trimoxazole (81.4%), followed by amoxicillin (80.2%). After identifying the causative strain, the susceptible antibiotic should be administered to reduce antibiotic resistance and better control of gynecological infections in female Pakistani population.

Characteristics and Antibiotic Resistance of Urinary Tract Pathogens Isolated From Punjab, Pakistan

Background:

Urinary tract infection (UTI) is deemed the most prevalent infectious disease in that it has now touched the overall incidence of 18/1000 persons per year in the general population.

Objectives:

This study sought to determine the characteristics of isolates from patients with UTI and their susceptibility to commonly used antibiotics in Punjab, Pakistan.

Patients and Methods:

Totally, 1429 urine samples were analyzed from UTI patients for the isolation of uropathogens at Chughtai’s Lahore Lab, Lahore, Pakistan, during a period of 14 months. The antimicrobial susceptibility test was performed via the disc diffusion method for the isolates obtained from 392 (26%) positive cultures.

Results:

The highest percentage (67%) of isolates was from females in comparison to males (33%). The frequency of Escherichia coli was the highest (62%) in culture-positive urine samples, followed by E. faecalis (15%), Candida (14%), Pseudomonas (6%), Klebsiella spp. (1%), Proteus (1%), and Staphylococcus aureus (1%). E. coli was highly resistant to antimicrobial drugs, viz. cephalexin (95%), cephradine (95%), pipemidic acid (92%), amikacin (91%), and nalidixic acid (91%). Most of the routine β-lactam antibiotics like amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, ampicillin, and aztreonam were also ineffective against E. coli, with resistance rates of 84%, 84%, and 72%, correspondingly. This pathogen showed maximum susceptibility (97%) against three drugs, namely imipenem, meropenem, and cefoperazone. Piperacillin and fosfomycin also provided significant results against E. coli with respective susceptibility rates of 96% and 90%.

Conclusions:

Our results showed that broad-spectrum antibiotics such as imipenem, meropenem, fosfomycin, cefoperazone/sulbactam, and vancomycin would be the first line and the most effective drugs for the empirical treatment of urinary tract pathogens due to their higher resistance rates against other drugs like cephalexin, cephradine, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and norfloxacin.