Independence of Urinary Symptoms and Urinary Dipstick Results in Voiders With Neurogenic Bladder

Intravesical Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG versus Saline Bladder Wash: Protocol for a Randomized, Controlled, Comparative Effectiveness Clinical Trial

Background

Complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI) is pervasive and costly among people with spinal cord injury (SCI) and neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD).

Objectives

To describe the protocol for a comparative effectiveness randomized controlled trial of intravesical Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG) versus saline bladder wash (BW) for self-management of urinary symptoms.

Methods

Comparative effectiveness trial of self-administered LGG versus saline bladder wash among 120 participants with SCI+NLUTD at least 6 months post SCI. The study has both treatment and prophylaxis phases. After predictive enrichment at screening, randomized participants will enter the treatment phase (6 months) in which they instill either LGG or normal saline after trigger symptoms occur (more cloudy or more foul-smelling urine). In the prophylaxis phase (6 months), participants will instill their respective intervention every 3 days after the first occurrence of trigger symptoms.

Results

Study results will provide a comparison of effects on Urinary Symptom Questionnaire for Neurogenic Bladder (USQNB) bladder and urine symptoms and episodes of "presumed UTIs"; number of days antibiotics were used (both self-reported); days of work, school, rehabilitation, or other activity lost due to urinary symptoms; engagement with the health care system; number of instillations; satisfaction; and safety.

Conclusion

cUTI is a variable clinical entity. Unlike clinical trials that assume a single, simple entity (UTI) in inclusion or outcome criteria, this protocol targets the mechanisms underlying cUTI causes and phenotypes. Featuring reliable and valid outcome measures with analytic methods specifically appropriate for quantifying self-report, patient self-management, inclusion of both intervention and prophylactic phases, and predictive enrichment, these design elements may be adopted for future research.

Development and Assessment of SCI Model Systems Complicated UTI Consensus Guidelines: A Psychometrically Designed Mixed-Methods Protocol

Background

Complicated UTI (cUTI) is highly prevalent among people with spinal cord injury and disease (SCI/D), but neither consistent nor evidence-based guidelines exist.

Objectives

We propose a two-phase, mixed-methods study to develop consensus around diagnostic and decision-making criteria for cUTI among people with SCI/D and the clinicians who treat them.

Methods

In phase 1 (qualitative), we will engage Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems (SCIMS) clinicians in focus groups to refine existing cUTI-related decision making using three reliable and validated Urinary Symptom Questionnaires for Neurogenic Bladder (USQNBs; intermittent catheterization, indwelling catheterization, and voiding) as points of departure, and then we will conduct a Delphi survey to explore and achieve consensus on cUTI diagnostic criteria among a nationally representative sample of clinicians from physical medicine and rehabilitation, infectious disease, urology, primary care, and emergency medicine. We will develop training materials based on these new guidelines and will deploy the training to both clinicians and consumers nationally. In phase 2 (quantitative), we will assess clinicians' uptake and use of the guidelines, and the impact of the guidelines training on consumers' self-management habits, engagement with the health care system, and antibiotic use over the 12 months after training.

Results

The output of this study will be diagnostic guidelines for cUTI among people with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD) due to SCI/D, with data on uptake (clinicians) and impact (patients).

Conclusion

This mixed-methods protocol integrates formal psychometric methods with large-scale evidence gathering to derive consensus around diagnostic guidelines for cUTI among people with NLUTD due to SCI/D and provides information on uptake (clinicians) and impact (patients).

To Explore the Diagnostic Value of Bulbocavernosus Muscle Reflex and Pudendal Somatosensory Evoked Potentials for Diabetic Neurogenic Bladder

Objective

To explore the diagnostic value of bulbocavernosus muscle reflex and pudendal somatosensory evoked potentials for diabetic neurogenic bladder.

Methods

From January 2021 to December 2021, 104 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus admitted to the hospital were recruited, with 57 allocated to the case group and 47 to the control group. Outcome measures included bulbocavernosus muscle response, pudendal somatosensory evoked potentials, and bladder residual urine volume. The connection of bulbocavernosus muscle response and pudendal somatosensory evoked potentials with bladder residual urine volume was investigated using the Pearson analysis.

Results

In both males and females, the latency of the left and right bulbocavernosus muscle reflexes in the case group was longer than in the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05), and the wave amplitude of the left and right bulbocavernosus muscle reflexes was significantly smaller than that of the control group (P < 0.05). The diabetic neurogenic bladder was associated with a significantly longer latency and a smaller wave amplitude of pudendal somatosensory evoked potentials versus without neurogenic bladder (P < 0.05). Patients with a diabetic neurogenic bladder had more residual bladder urine volume versus those without (P < 0.05). Bladder residual urine volume was significantly positively correlated with bulbocavernosus muscle reflex and pudendal somatosensory evoked potential latency and negatively correlated with wave amplitude (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

The bulbocavernosus muscle reflex and pudendal somatosensory evoked potentials demonstrate great potential as adjuncts to diagnose diabetic neurogenic bladder and correlate with ultrasound results in determining bladder function in patients.