Radiographic Evaluation of the Hyoid Bone Position and Pharyngeal Airway Depth in Anteroposterior Dysplasia

Comparing Pharyngeal Airway Dimensions and Hyoid Bone Position in the Subgroups of Skeletal Class III Malocclusions: A Cephalometric Study

Aim:

To examine pharyngeal airway dimensions and hyoid bone position according to the subgroups of Class III malocclusion.

Materials and Methods:

This retrospective study consisted of patients divided into three subgroups with skeletal Class III malocclusion. The study included a total of 151 individuals (61 females and 90 males). The authors divided individuals with skeletal Class III malocclusion into three subgroups: maxillary retrognathia, mandibular prognathia, and combined. The study’s cephalometric analysis used eight nasopharyngeal, seven oropharyngeal, two hypopharyngeal, nine hyoid, and four area measurements. One-way analysis of variance was used to evaluate patients. Tukey’s post-hoc tests were used for bilateral comparisons of significant parameters. The results were considered statistically significant at a P < .05 significance level.

Results:

The study found no significant differences between the groups’ pharyngeal airway and area measurements ( P > .05). When the authors evaluated hyoid bone position, a statistically significant difference was found between the three groups’ Hy-A (mm), Hy-S (mm), Hy-SN (mm), and Hy-FH (mm) measurements ( P < .05).

Conclusion:

Linear and areal pharyngeal airway dimensions are similar in subgroups of Class III malocclusions, while the hyoid bone is vertically higher in individuals with maxillary retrognathia.

Evaluation of pharyngeal airway dimensions and hyoid bone position according to craniofacial growth pattern

OBJECTIVE

To compare pharyngeal airway dimensions and hyoid bone position in different craniofacial growth patterns.

METHODS

In total, 611 patients divided into 9 subgroups were compared according to malocclusion classification and vertical growth pattern, and these subgroups were compared in terms of pharyngeal airway and hyoid measurements. A two-way ANOVA test was used to compare the findings of the subgroups.

RESULTS

No significant difference was found for the pharyngeal measurements between the groups (p>0.05). The vertical airway length (PNS-Ep) was significantly shorter in the Class III malocclusion group (p<0.05) and in the hypodivergent group (p<0.05). No statistically significant difference was found between any subgroups in any measurements of the position of the hyoid bone (p>0.05).

CONCLUSION

The pharyngeal airway dimensions and hyoid bone position are similar among individuals in the sagittal direction. The vertical airway length is significantly shorter in Class III and hypodivergent individuals.