1
|
Hitova-Topkarova D, Payakova V, Kostova-Lefterova D, Ivanova M, Vasileva-Slaveva M, Yordanov A. Electronic brachytherapy for gynecological cancers - a systematic review. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2023; 28:79-87. [PMID: 37122914 PMCID: PMC10132201 DOI: 10.5603/rpor.a2023.0003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2022] [Accepted: 12/21/2022] [Indexed: 05/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The purpose of this manuscript is to provide an in-depth literature review of the management of endometrial and cervical cancers with electronic brachytherapy. Materials and methods An extensive literature search was performed and 9 articles were selected based on preset criteria. Results The reviewed studies provided dosimetric and clinical results. Patient populations were diverse and prescribed doses varied. When treatment plans were compared to those using cobalt 60 (60Co) and iridium 192 (192Ir) sources researchers found lower or equivalent doses in organs at risk while the doses at the applicator surface were significantly higher for electronic brachytherapy. In the eligible studies, a total of 72 patients received treatment with AxxentXoft vaginal applicator, 29 were treated with the Intrabeam vaginal applicator, and 8 with AxxentXoft cervical applicator. Conclusions All authors found that electronic brachytherapy was safe and well tolerated as higher mucosal doses did not present as adverse clinical effects. Electronic brachytherapy for gynecological cancers has the potential to achieve equivalent tumor control while minimizing bowel and urinary toxicity thus improving the quality of life. More clinical data is needed to stratify patients who would benefit the most.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Virginia Payakova
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University — Pleven, Pleven, Bulgaria
| | - Desislava Kostova-Lefterova
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University — Pleven, Pleven, Bulgaria
- National Cardiology Hospital, Sofia, Bulgaria
- Aleksandrovska University Hospital, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Mirela Ivanova
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University — Pleven, Pleven, Bulgaria
| | - Mariela Vasileva-Slaveva
- Department of Breast Surgery, Shterev Hospital, Sofia, Bulgaria
- Research Institute, University Pleven, Pleven, Bulgaria
| | - Angel Yordanov
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Medical University Pleven, Pleven, Bulgaria
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Benkhaled S, Van Gestel D, Gomes da Silveira Cauduro C, Palumbo S, del Marmol V, Desmet A. The State of the Art of Radiotherapy for Non-melanoma Skin Cancer: A Review of the Literature. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:913269. [PMID: 35833108 PMCID: PMC9272768 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.913269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2022] [Accepted: 05/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Due to the general aging population and the fashion trend of sun exposure, non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) is rising. The management of NMSC is difficult and necessitates a multidisciplinary team (i.e., pathologists, dermatologists, medical oncologists, surgeons, and radiation oncologists). When surgery is not an option or will cause unacceptably functional morbidity, radiation therapy (RT) may be a preferable tissue-preserving option. Whether used alone or in conjunction with other treatments, RT has been shown to be quite effective in terms of cosmetic results and local control. Contact hypofractionated RT, brachytherapy, and electronic brachytherapy are all promising new treatments. However, rigorous, randomized trials are missing, explaining the disparity in dose, fractionation, and technique recommendations. Therefore, it is essential that interdisciplinary teams better understand RT modalities, benefits, and drawbacks. Our review will provide the role and indications for RT in patients with NMSC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sofian Benkhaled
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet-Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
- *Correspondence: Sofian Benkhaled
| | - Dirk Van Gestel
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet-Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Samuel Palumbo
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Jolimont Hospital, La Louvière, Belgium
| | - Veronique del Marmol
- Department of Dermatology, Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Antoine Desmet
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet-Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Valdes‐Cortez C, Niatsetski Y, Perez‐Calatayud J, Ballester F, Vijande J. A Monte Carlo study of the relative biological effectiveness in surface brachytherapy. Med Phys 2022; 49:5576-5588. [DOI: 10.1002/mp.15774] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2022] [Revised: 05/11/2022] [Accepted: 05/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yury Niatsetski
- R&D Elekta Brachytherapy Waardgelder 1, 3905 TH Veenendaal The Netherlands
| | - Jose Perez‐Calatayud
- Unidad Mixta de Investigación en Radiofísica e Instrumentación Nuclear en Medicina (IRIMED) Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe (IIS‐La Fe)‐Universitat de Valencia (UV)
- Radiotherapy Department La Fe Hospital Valencia Spain
- Radiotherapy Department Hospital Clinica Benidorm Alicante Spain
| | - Facundo Ballester
- Unidad Mixta de Investigación en Radiofísica e Instrumentación Nuclear en Medicina (IRIMED) Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe (IIS‐La Fe)‐Universitat de Valencia (UV)
- Department of Atomic, Molecular and Nuclear Physics University of Valencia Burjassot Spain
| | - Javier Vijande
- Unidad Mixta de Investigación en Radiofísica e Instrumentación Nuclear en Medicina (IRIMED) Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe (IIS‐La Fe)‐Universitat de Valencia (UV)
- Department of Atomic, Molecular and Nuclear Physics University of Valencia Burjassot Spain
- Instituto de Física Corpuscular IFIC (UV‐CSIC) Burjassot Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Feasibility of electronic brachytherapy in cervix cancer-A dosimetric comparison of different brachytherapy techniques. Brachytherapy 2022; 21:389-396. [PMID: 35246391 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2022.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2021] [Revised: 01/03/2022] [Accepted: 01/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study analyzes cases in which electronic brachytherapy (eBT) led to acceptable treatment plans in cervical cancer. Findings were compared with dosimetry values obtained in 192Ir-based treatments according to the high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) and the disease stage. MATERIAL AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 48 patients with cervical cancer from two centers. The patients were treated with 192Ir based on MRI. It was possible to use interstitial needles via an Utrecht-type applicator. Dosimetry was simulated using eBT and the parameters D90 and D98 (HR-CTV) and D2cc, D1cc, and D0.1cc (bladder, rectum, and sigmoid colon) were evaluated. The Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparison. The overall cohort of patients was analyzed, as were the sub-cohorts based on stage (FIGO stages I+IIA, IIB and III-IV). Finally, the dosimetry of the eBT plans was evaluated, and the plans obtained were classified as "good", "acceptable", or "poor". RESULTS Statistically significant differences were found between the eBT and 192Ir plans for D98 (HR-CTV), D1cc and D0.1cc (bladder), and D1cc and D0.1cc (sigmoid colon). A total of 31 cases (64.6%) were considered good, seven (14.6%) were considered acceptable, and 10 (20.8%) were considered poor. For volumes <30 cc, all the plans were good or acceptable; for volumes >30 cc, 54.3% were good, and 71.4% were good or acceptable. By stage, eBT plans for patients with stage IB-IIA disease were good in 100%, whereas those for patients with stage IIB were good in 70.6% and III-IV disease were good in 50%. CONCLUSIONS eBT provides appropriate dosimetry for treatment of cervical cancer in selected cases.
Collapse
|
5
|
Muto P, Pastore F. Radiotherapy in the Adjuvant and Advanced Setting of CSCC. Dermatol Pract Concept 2021; 11:e2021168S. [PMID: 34877076 DOI: 10.5826/dpc.11s2a168s] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/22/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction The use of radiotherapy for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) has solid historical roots. It is used with patients who are not suitable for surgery, with patients with high-risk histological features in the adjuvant setting, and in palliative care. Objectives The aim of this article is to summarize and provide a radiation therapy overview on the indications, effectiveness, and potential adverse events of radiotherapy in the adjuvant and advanced setting of CSCC. Methods We performed a comprehensive literature review on PubMed, adopted as our biomedical literature database. Articles were selected based on their date of publication (in the last 30 years) and relevance. Results Radiotherapy (RT) can safely be used to manage non-surgical patients and high-risk patients in the advanced CSCC setting. The remarkable progress of delivery techniques has greatly improved the effectiveness and toxicity profile of RT treatments. From 2D techniques to intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), and brachytherapy, all RT techniques have greatly advanced. To improve acute and chronic side effects, a deeper care has been used. As regards CSCC, several dose fractionations and schedules have been suggested, in line with the patient's age and medical conditions. Conclusions RT is a fundamental and constantly evolving therapeutic option in the treatment of CSCC, to minimize the risk of recurrence and metastases in the adjuvant setting and in the exclusive treatment for non-surgical patients. Patients' selection is crucial, together with and a collaborative team working approach among the specialists involved in disease management in the perspective of the best multidisciplinary assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Muto
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale - Naples, Italy
| | - Francesco Pastore
- Radiation Oncology, Fondazione Muto Onlus - Emicenter - Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy for the Treatment of Basal and Squamous Cell Carcinomas on Sensitive Areas of the Face: A Report of Clinical Outcomes and Acute and Subacute Toxicities. Adv Radiat Oncol 2020; 6:100616. [PMID: 33912732 PMCID: PMC8071728 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2020.10.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2020] [Revised: 10/02/2020] [Accepted: 10/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Basal cell and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma are common malignancies (keratinocyte carcinomas [KCs]). Surgical resection is the standard of care. Radiation using high-dose rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) may serve as a superior alternative where surgical scars may be of cosmetic concern or in elderly patients with significant comorbidity. We aim to describe the clinical and cosmetic outcomes as well as posttreatment radiation toxicities associated with HDR-BT in patients who were treated for KCs of the face. Methods and Materials Patients with KCs treated with HDR-BT from 2015 to 2018 were included in the study. Patient medical records and clinical photos were reviewed at multiple time points: start of treatment, end of treatment, short-term (2 week) follow-up, 3-month follow-up, and if needed at 6 months. Radiation toxicity was graded using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Grading (RTOG) acute toxicity scale. Median (range) toxicity grades at follow-up intervals were calculated. Clinical outcomes including local recurrence were evaluated for all patients. Results The study included 19 patients and 20 KCs. The median radiation dose was 42 Gy (39-42 Gy) over 6 fractions. The median toxicity at completion of treatment was RTOG grade 2 (85% of patients). At short-term follow-up, 50% of patients (n = 10) improved to RTOG grade 1 (0-2). At 3 months, 70% of patients (n = 14) had RTOG grade 0, and by 6 months, 100% of patients (n = 18) had RTOG grade 0. No RTOG grade 3 or higher skin toxicity was observed. With a median follow-up of 7.2 months (range, 1.3-54.4 months), the local recurrence-free survival was 95%. Conclusions We demonstrate that HDR-BT can be used as definitive treatment of KCs of the face with excellent cosmetic outcomes and local control. Acute and subacute skin toxicities were most commonly RTOG grade 2 or less with resolution of patient's skin toxicity by 3 months.
Collapse
|
7
|
Shah C, Ouhib Z, Kamrava M, Koyfman SA, Campbell SR, Bhatnagar A, Canavan J, Husain Z, Barker CA, Cohen GN, Strasswimmer J, Joshi N. The American Brachytherapy society consensus statement for skin brachytherapy. Brachytherapy 2020; 19:415-426. [PMID: 32409128 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2020.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2020] [Revised: 03/24/2020] [Accepted: 04/07/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Keratinocyte carcinoma (KC, previously nonmelanoma skin cancer) represents the most common cancer worldwide. While surgical treatment is commonly utilized, various radiation therapy techniques are available including external beam and brachytherapy. As such, the American Brachytherapy Society has created an updated consensus statement regarding the use of brachytherapy in the treatment of KCs. METHODS Physicians and physicists with expertise in skin cancer and brachytherapy created a consensus statement for appropriate patient selection, data, dosimetry, and utilization of skin brachytherapy and techniques based on a literature search and clinical experience. RESULTS Guidelines for patient selection, evaluation, and dose/fractionation schedules to optimize outcomes for patients with KC undergoing brachytherapy are presented. Studies of electronic brachytherapy are emerging, although limited long-term data or comparative data are available. Radionuclide-based brachytherapy represents an appropriate option for patients with small KCs with multiple techniques available. CONCLUSIONS Skin brachytherapy represents a standard of care option for appropriately selected patients with KC. Radionuclide-based brachytherapy represents a well-established technique; however, the current recommendation is that electronic brachytherapy be used for KC on prospective clinical trial or registry because of a paucity of mature data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chirag Shah
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
| | - Zoubir Ouhib
- Lynn Cancer Institute, Boca Raton Regional Hospital, Boca Raton, FL
| | - Mitchell Kamrava
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Shlomo A Koyfman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Shauna R Campbell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Ajay Bhatnagar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Alliance Oncology, Casa Grande, AZ
| | - Joycelin Canavan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Zain Husain
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Christopher A Barker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Gil'ad N Cohen
- Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - John Strasswimmer
- College of Medicine (Dermatology) and College of Sciences (Biochemistry), Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL
| | - Nikhil Joshi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lang BM, Balermpas P, Bauer A, Blum A, Brölsch GF, Dirschka T, Follmann M, Frank J, Frerich B, Fritz K, Hauschild A, Heindl LM, Howaldt HP, Ihrler S, Kakkassery V, Klumpp B, Krause-Bergmann A, Löser C, Meissner M, Sachse MM, Schlaak M, Schön MP, Tischendorf L, Tronnier M, Vordermark D, Welzel J, Weichenthal M, Wiegand S, Kaufmann R, Grabbe S. S2k Guidelines for Cutaneous Basal Cell Carcinoma - Part 2: Treatment, Prevention and Follow-up. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2020; 17:214-230. [PMID: 30762963 DOI: 10.1111/ddg.13755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common malignant tumor among fair-skinned individuals, and its incidence had been steadily rising in the past decades. In order to maintain the highest quality of patient care possible, the German S2k guidelines were updated following a systematic literature search and with the participation of all professional societies and associations involved in the management of the disease. Part 2 addresses issues such as proper risk stratification, the various therapeutic approaches, and prevention as well as follow-up of patients with basal cell carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Berenice M Lang
- Department of Dermatology, Mainz University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
| | - Panagiotis Balermpas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Frankfurt University Medical Center, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Andrea Bauer
- Department of Dermatology, Carl Gustav Carus University Medical Center, Dresden, Germany
| | - Andreas Blum
- Dermatology and Teaching Practice, Konstanz, Germany
| | - G Felix Brölsch
- Department of Plastic, Aesthetic, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Hanover Medical School, Hanover, Germany
| | - Thomas Dirschka
- CentroDerm Clinic, Wuppertal, Germany.,Faculty of Health, Witten-Herdecke University, Witten, Germany
| | | | - Jorge Frank
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Göttingen University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Bernhard Frerich
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Plastic Surgery, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany
| | - Klaus Fritz
- Dermatology and Laser Center, Landau, Germany
| | - Axel Hauschild
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Schleswig-Holstein University Medical Center, Kiel, Germany
| | - Ludwig M Heindl
- Department of Ophthalmology, Cologne University Medical Center, Cologne, Germany
| | - Hans-Peter Howaldt
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Gießen University Medical Center, Gießen, Germany
| | - Stephan Ihrler
- Laboratory for Dermatohistology and Oral Pathology, Munich, Germany
| | - Vinodh Kakkassery
- Department of Ophthalmology, Schleswig-Holstein University Medical Center, Lübeck, Germany.,Department of Ophthalmology, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany
| | - Bernhard Klumpp
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Tübingen University Medical Center, Tübingen, Germany.,Department of Radiology, Rems-Murr Medical Center, Winnenden, Germany
| | | | - Christoph Löser
- Department of Dermatology, Ludwigshafen Medical Center, Ludwigshafen, Germany
| | - Markus Meissner
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Frankfurt University Medical Center, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Michael M Sachse
- Department of Dermatology, Allergology and Phlebology, Bremerhaven Medical Center, Bremerhaven, Germany
| | - Max Schlaak
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Munich University Medical Center, Munich, Germany
| | - Michael P Schön
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Göttingen University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany
| | | | - Michael Tronnier
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Helios Medical Center, Hildesheim, Germany
| | - Dirk Vordermark
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Halle University Medical Center, Martin Luther University, Halle, Germany
| | - Julia Welzel
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Augsburg Medical Center, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Michael Weichenthal
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Schleswig-Holstein University Medical Center, Kiel, Germany
| | - Susanne Wiegand
- Department of Otolaryngology, Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Roland Kaufmann
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Frankfurt University Medical Center, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Stephan Grabbe
- Department of Dermatology, Mainz University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kakkassery V, Emmert S, Adamietz IA, Kovács G, Jünemann AM, Otte C, Zimbelmann M, Brosig A, Grisanti S, Heindl LM. [Alternative treatment options for periorbital basal cell carcinoma]. Ophthalmologe 2020; 117:113-123. [PMID: 31811367 DOI: 10.1007/s00347-019-01021-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Latest developments as well as established procedures offer alternative treatment approaches to basal cell carcinoma (BCC) when micrographically controlled surgical removal is not a valid option. OBJECTIVE Alternative treatment options for periorbital BCC are presented. METHODS A literature search was carried out and a structured display and analysis of the results are given. RESULTS Micrographically controlled surgical removal represents the gold standard in treatment of BCC. When for various reasons surgical removal is not a valid option, other procedures are required. The alternative treatment options can be divided into three main groups: treatment options for locally advanced or metastasized BCC, topical approaches for small and superficial BCC and prophylactic measures. While radiotherapy and systemic therapy are suitable for locally advanced BCC and are discussed in a tumor board, small and superficial BCC can be treated by topical medication. In cases of a previous BCC history, a prophylactic treatment can be considered. Combinations of systemic treatment and also neoadjuvant or adjuvant approaches before and after surgery are promising options for a successful outcome, which can further improve the standard treatment for locally advanced BCC. CONCLUSION Alternative treatment options for periocular BCC are available; however, the use is only indicated when microscopically controlled excision with subsequent oculoplastic reconstruction is not possible. According to the national guidelines a prior presentation to a suitable tumor board is practically compulsory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vinodh Kakkassery
- Klinik für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Deutschland.
| | - Steffen Emmert
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Dermatologie, Universitätsmedizin Rostock, Rostock, Deutschland
| | | | - György Kovács
- Gemelli INTERACTS - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rom, Italien.,Bereich Interdisziplinäre Brachytherapie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Deutschland
| | - Anselm M Jünemann
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsmedizin Rostock, Rostock, Deutschland
| | - Caroline Otte
- Klinik für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Deutschland
| | - Michael Zimbelmann
- Klinik für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Deutschland
| | - Anton Brosig
- Klinik für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Deutschland
| | - Salvatore Grisanti
- Klinik für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Deutschland
| | - Ludwig M Heindl
- Zentrum für Augenheilkunde, Medizinische Fakultät und Uniklinik Köln, Universität zu Köln, Köln, Deutschland.,Centrum für Integrierte Onkologie (CIO) Aachen-Bonn-Köln-Düsseldorf, Köln, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Veness MJ, Delishaj D, Barnes EA, Bezugly A, Rembielak A. Current Role of Radiotherapy in Non-melanoma Skin Cancer. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2019; 31:749-758. [PMID: 31447088 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2019.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2019] [Revised: 07/07/2019] [Accepted: 08/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) represents the most frequently diagnosed malignancy worldwide, most being cutaneous basal cell and squamous cell carcinoma. The global incidence of NMSC continues to increase as the global population ages. Numerous treatment options are available for NMSC patients, with radiotherapy an efficacious and tissue-preserving non-surgical option. External beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy are modalities with specific indications and advantages in treating NMSC. Where excision is not an option (medically/technically inoperable) or considered less ideal (e.g. cosmetic or functional outcome), radiotherapy offers an excellent alternative. Inoperable elderly and/or co-morbid patients of poor performance status can benefit from short-course hypofractionated radiotherapy, with very acceptable toxicity. Adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with unfavourable pathology can decrease the risk of local and regional recurrence and associated morbidity and mortality. Radiotherapy has advantages and disadvantages and it is important for clinicians to understand these. Managing patients with NMSC is carried out by clinicians from multiple disciplines but it is imperative that they are all aware of the role of radiotherapy in their patients in various clinical settings. Here we aim to discuss the role and indications for recommending radiotherapy in patients with NMSC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M J Veness
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
| | - D Delishaj
- Department of Translational Medicine, Division of Radiation Oncology - University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - E A Barnes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - A Bezugly
- Academy of Postgraduate Education of the Russian Federal Medical-Biological Agency, Moscow, Russia
| | - A Rembielak
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lozares-Cordero S, Font-Gómez JA, Gandía‐Martínez A, Miranda‐Burgos A, Méndez‐Villamón A, Villa‐Gazulla D, Alba‐Escorihuela V, Jiménez‐Puertas S, González‐Pérez V. Treatment of cervical cancer with electronic brachytherapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2019; 20:78-86. [PMID: 31183970 PMCID: PMC6612687 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12657] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2018] [Revised: 05/09/2019] [Accepted: 05/20/2019] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We report the first cervical cancer cases treated with interstitial electronic brachytherapy (eBT) at our hospital and compare them with plans made with high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy based on Ir192 (HDR-BT). MATERIALS AND METHODS Eight patients with cervical cancer were treated with the Axxent eBT device (Xoft, Inc.). Planning was with magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography following the recommendations of the EMBRACE protocol. The dosimetry parameters of organs at risk (OAR) were evaluated for the bladder, rectum, and sigmoid colon (D2cc, D1cc, and D0.1cc). In addition, the V150 and V200 of irradiated tissue were compared for both eBT and HDR-BT. All patients received intensity-modulated external beam radiation therapy with a regimen of 23 sessions of 2 Gy followed by four sessions of 7 Gy of eBT performed over 2 weeks (two sessions followed by another two sessions a week later) following the EMBRACE recommendations. Each of the eight patients was followed to assess acute toxicity associated with treatment. RESULTS The doses reaching OAR for eBT plans were lower than for HDR-BT plans. As for acute toxicity associated with eBT, very few cases of mucositis were detected. No cases of rectal toxicity and one case with grade 1 urinary toxicity were detected. The results at 1 month are equally good, and no relapses have occurred to date. CONCLUSIONS The first results of treatment with the Axxent eBT device are promising, as no recurrences have been observed and toxicity is very low. eBT is a good alternative for treating cervical cancer in centers without access to conventional HDR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sergio Lozares-Cordero
- Department of Physics and Radiation ProtectionMiguel Servet University HospitalZaragozaSpain
| | - José Antonio Font-Gómez
- Department of Physics and Radiation ProtectionMiguel Servet University HospitalZaragozaSpain
| | | | | | | | - David Villa‐Gazulla
- Department of Physics and Radiation ProtectionMiguel Servet University HospitalZaragozaSpain
| | | | - Sara Jiménez‐Puertas
- Department of Physics and Radiation ProtectionMiguel Servet University HospitalZaragozaSpain
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
The American Brachytherapy Society consensus statement for electronic brachytherapy. Brachytherapy 2019; 18:292-298. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2018.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2018] [Accepted: 10/31/2018] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
13
|
Lang BM, Balermpas P, Bauer A, Blum A, Brölsch GF, Dirschka T, Follmann M, Frank J, Frerich B, Fritz K, Hauschild A, Heindl LM, Howaldt HP, Ihrler S, Kakkassery V, Klumpp B, Krause-Bergmann A, Löser C, Meissner M, Sachse MM, Schlaak M, Schön MP, Tischendorf L, Tronnier M, Vordermark D, Welzel J, Weichenthal M, Wiegand S, Kaufmann R, Grabbe S. S2k-Leitlinie Basalzellkarzinom der Haut - Teil 2: Therapie, Prävention und Nachsorge. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2019; 17:214-231. [PMID: 30762951 DOI: 10.1111/ddg.13755_g] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Andrea Bauer
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Dermatologie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Dresden
| | | | - G Felix Brölsch
- Klinik für Plastische, Ästhetische, Hand- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
| | - Thomas Dirschka
- CentroDerm, Wuppertal.,Fakultät für Gesundheit, Universität Witten-Herdecke
| | | | - Jorge Frank
- Klinik für Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen
| | - Bernhard Frerich
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Mund-, Kiefer- und plastische Gesichtschirurgie, Universitätsmedizin Rostock
| | | | - Axel Hauschild
- Klinik für Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel
| | | | - Hans-Peter Howaldt
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Mund-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Gießen
| | | | - Vinodh Kakkassery
- Klinik für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck.,Klinik und Poliklinik für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsmedizin Rostock
| | - Bernhard Klumpp
- Abteilung für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen.,Radiologie, Rems-Murr-Klinikum Winnenden
| | | | | | - Markus Meissner
- Klinik für Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt
| | - Michael M Sachse
- Klinik für Dermatologie, Allergologie und Phlebologie, Klinikum Bremerhaven
| | - Max Schlaak
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Dermatologie und Allergologie, Klinikum der Universität München
| | - Michael P Schön
- Klinik für Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen
| | | | - Michael Tronnier
- Klinik für Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie, Helios Klinikum Hildesheim
| | - Dirk Vordermark
- Universitätsklinik und Poliklinik für Strahlentherapie, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg
| | - Julia Welzel
- Klinik für Dermatologie und Allergologie, Klinikum Augsburg
| | - Michael Weichenthal
- Klinik für Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel
| | - Susanne Wiegand
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals-, Nasen-, Ohrenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig
| | - Roland Kaufmann
- Klinik für Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Nestor MS, Berman B, Goldberg D, Cognetta AB, Gold M, Roth W, Cockerell CJ, Glick B. Consensus Guidelines on the Use of Superficial Radiation Therapy for Treating Nonmelanoma Skin Cancers and Keloids. THE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND AESTHETIC DERMATOLOGY 2019; 12:12-18. [PMID: 30881578 PMCID: PMC6415702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Background: The use of superficial radiation therapy (SRT) has experienced a renaissance for treating nonmelanoma skin cancers (NMSCs) and recurrent keloids; however, published treatment guidelines are lacking. Objective: The objective of this work was to provide consensus guidelines on the use of SRT for treating NMSC and recurrent keloids based on a review of the literature and expert opinion. Methods and Materials: A search of the medical literature was performed to obtain published information on the use of SRT for review. A group of qualified dermatologists convened to discuss their views on the use of SRT for the treatment of NMSCs and recurrent keloids. The various guidelines were considered to have consensus based on a supermajority two-thirds vote. The final consensus guidelines are thus based on the medical literature, when available, and expert opinions. Results: Agreement on consensus guidelines was reached for numerous aspects of SRT use, including appropriate tumor types for SRT; anatomical areas suitable for SRT; energy, fractions, and scheduling recommendations for SRT; use of SRT in the presence of comorbidities; safety factors; and treatment recommendations for recurrent keloids, based the literature and on both the opinions of the expert group and a survey of experienced users. Conclusion: Consensus was reached that SRT is a safe and effective treatment for basal cell and squamous cell carcinomas and should be considered as the first-line form of radiation treatment. Postsurgical treatment of keloid excision suture lines with SRT significantly reduces keloid recurrence rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark S Nestor
- Drs. Nestor and Berman are with the Center for Clinical and Cosmetic Research in A ventura, Florida and the Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine in Miami, Florida
- Dr. Goldberg is with Skin Laser & Surgery Specialists of NY/NJ, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, and Fordham Law School in New York, New York
- Dr. Cognetta is with Dermatology Associates of Tallahassee in Tallahassee, Florida
- Dr. Gold is with Gold Skin Care Center, the Tennessee Clinical Research Center, Vanderbilt University School of Nursing, and Meharry Medical College School of Medicine in Nashville, Tennessee
- Dr. Roth is with Dermatology and Dermatological Surgery in Boynton Beach, Florida
- Dr. Cockerell is with Cockerell Dermatopathology in Dallas, Texas
- Dr. Glick is with the Glick Skin Institute in Margate, Florida
| | - Brian Berman
- Drs. Nestor and Berman are with the Center for Clinical and Cosmetic Research in A ventura, Florida and the Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine in Miami, Florida
- Dr. Goldberg is with Skin Laser & Surgery Specialists of NY/NJ, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, and Fordham Law School in New York, New York
- Dr. Cognetta is with Dermatology Associates of Tallahassee in Tallahassee, Florida
- Dr. Gold is with Gold Skin Care Center, the Tennessee Clinical Research Center, Vanderbilt University School of Nursing, and Meharry Medical College School of Medicine in Nashville, Tennessee
- Dr. Roth is with Dermatology and Dermatological Surgery in Boynton Beach, Florida
- Dr. Cockerell is with Cockerell Dermatopathology in Dallas, Texas
- Dr. Glick is with the Glick Skin Institute in Margate, Florida
| | - David Goldberg
- Drs. Nestor and Berman are with the Center for Clinical and Cosmetic Research in A ventura, Florida and the Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine in Miami, Florida
- Dr. Goldberg is with Skin Laser & Surgery Specialists of NY/NJ, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, and Fordham Law School in New York, New York
- Dr. Cognetta is with Dermatology Associates of Tallahassee in Tallahassee, Florida
- Dr. Gold is with Gold Skin Care Center, the Tennessee Clinical Research Center, Vanderbilt University School of Nursing, and Meharry Medical College School of Medicine in Nashville, Tennessee
- Dr. Roth is with Dermatology and Dermatological Surgery in Boynton Beach, Florida
- Dr. Cockerell is with Cockerell Dermatopathology in Dallas, Texas
- Dr. Glick is with the Glick Skin Institute in Margate, Florida
| | - Armand B Cognetta
- Drs. Nestor and Berman are with the Center for Clinical and Cosmetic Research in A ventura, Florida and the Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine in Miami, Florida
- Dr. Goldberg is with Skin Laser & Surgery Specialists of NY/NJ, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, and Fordham Law School in New York, New York
- Dr. Cognetta is with Dermatology Associates of Tallahassee in Tallahassee, Florida
- Dr. Gold is with Gold Skin Care Center, the Tennessee Clinical Research Center, Vanderbilt University School of Nursing, and Meharry Medical College School of Medicine in Nashville, Tennessee
- Dr. Roth is with Dermatology and Dermatological Surgery in Boynton Beach, Florida
- Dr. Cockerell is with Cockerell Dermatopathology in Dallas, Texas
- Dr. Glick is with the Glick Skin Institute in Margate, Florida
| | - Michael Gold
- Drs. Nestor and Berman are with the Center for Clinical and Cosmetic Research in A ventura, Florida and the Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine in Miami, Florida
- Dr. Goldberg is with Skin Laser & Surgery Specialists of NY/NJ, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, and Fordham Law School in New York, New York
- Dr. Cognetta is with Dermatology Associates of Tallahassee in Tallahassee, Florida
- Dr. Gold is with Gold Skin Care Center, the Tennessee Clinical Research Center, Vanderbilt University School of Nursing, and Meharry Medical College School of Medicine in Nashville, Tennessee
- Dr. Roth is with Dermatology and Dermatological Surgery in Boynton Beach, Florida
- Dr. Cockerell is with Cockerell Dermatopathology in Dallas, Texas
- Dr. Glick is with the Glick Skin Institute in Margate, Florida
| | - William Roth
- Drs. Nestor and Berman are with the Center for Clinical and Cosmetic Research in A ventura, Florida and the Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine in Miami, Florida
- Dr. Goldberg is with Skin Laser & Surgery Specialists of NY/NJ, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, and Fordham Law School in New York, New York
- Dr. Cognetta is with Dermatology Associates of Tallahassee in Tallahassee, Florida
- Dr. Gold is with Gold Skin Care Center, the Tennessee Clinical Research Center, Vanderbilt University School of Nursing, and Meharry Medical College School of Medicine in Nashville, Tennessee
- Dr. Roth is with Dermatology and Dermatological Surgery in Boynton Beach, Florida
- Dr. Cockerell is with Cockerell Dermatopathology in Dallas, Texas
- Dr. Glick is with the Glick Skin Institute in Margate, Florida
| | - Clay J Cockerell
- Drs. Nestor and Berman are with the Center for Clinical and Cosmetic Research in A ventura, Florida and the Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine in Miami, Florida
- Dr. Goldberg is with Skin Laser & Surgery Specialists of NY/NJ, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, and Fordham Law School in New York, New York
- Dr. Cognetta is with Dermatology Associates of Tallahassee in Tallahassee, Florida
- Dr. Gold is with Gold Skin Care Center, the Tennessee Clinical Research Center, Vanderbilt University School of Nursing, and Meharry Medical College School of Medicine in Nashville, Tennessee
- Dr. Roth is with Dermatology and Dermatological Surgery in Boynton Beach, Florida
- Dr. Cockerell is with Cockerell Dermatopathology in Dallas, Texas
- Dr. Glick is with the Glick Skin Institute in Margate, Florida
| | - Brad Glick
- Drs. Nestor and Berman are with the Center for Clinical and Cosmetic Research in A ventura, Florida and the Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine in Miami, Florida
- Dr. Goldberg is with Skin Laser & Surgery Specialists of NY/NJ, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, and Fordham Law School in New York, New York
- Dr. Cognetta is with Dermatology Associates of Tallahassee in Tallahassee, Florida
- Dr. Gold is with Gold Skin Care Center, the Tennessee Clinical Research Center, Vanderbilt University School of Nursing, and Meharry Medical College School of Medicine in Nashville, Tennessee
- Dr. Roth is with Dermatology and Dermatological Surgery in Boynton Beach, Florida
- Dr. Cockerell is with Cockerell Dermatopathology in Dallas, Texas
- Dr. Glick is with the Glick Skin Institute in Margate, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Postoperative endometrial cancer treatments with electronic brachytherapy source. JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE 2018. [DOI: 10.1017/s1460396918000353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
AbstractPurposeThis study is a dosimetric and acute toxicity comparison of endometrial cancer patients treated with either Axxent (Xoft, Inc., San José, CA, USA) electronic and interstitial brachytherapy versus interstitial high dose rate brachytherapy (HDRBT).Materials and MethodsBetween 2015 and 2017, 94 patients with postoperative endometrial cancer were treated in our centre with the Axxent electronic brachytherapy (eBT) system. The V150 and V200 are evaluated prospectively for each plan. The mean age of patients was 65.9 years (age range 33–84 years), with different tumour staging. Of the 94 patients, 37 received exclusive adjuvant brachytherapy (25 Gy in five sessions); the remaining patients received external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with a regimen of 23 sessions of 2 Gy each to the entire pelvis, followed by eBT (15 Gy in three sessions). Additionally, the absorbed doses received by the organs at risk (OAR), urinary bladder, rectum and sigmoid colon were compared with HDRBT plans, evaluating D2cc, V50% and V35%. Median follow-up was done for each of the 94 patients to assess the toxicity of the treatment: vaginal mucosa toxicity, rectal and urinary toxicity; and results are presented for acute toxicity, toxicity at 1 month after the end of treatment and follow-up after 12 months for a portion of patients according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) toxicity criteria.ResultsThe doses in OAR for eBT plans were lower than that for HDRBT plans, both Ir-192 and Co-60 plans, whose doses were similar. The dose in bladder with eBT was 63.8% of the prescribed dose for D2cc versus 70.1% for HDRBT Ir-192, for V50% was 7.2% versus 12.7% and for V35% was 15.2% versus 28.2%. In rectum the D2cc was 61.2% versus 68.4%, for V50% was 7.9% versus 14.3% and for V35% was 16.7% versus 32%. Results demonstrated lower doses to OAR in all eBT plans. Acute toxicity in eBT was very low in cases of mucositis, with only one case of toxicity greater than grade 1, rectal toxicity and urinary toxicity; results at 1 month are equally good, toxicity symptoms disappeared and no relapses have occurred to date.ConclusionsThe results of treatment with the Axxent eBT unit for 94 patients are very good, as no recurrence has been observed and the toxicity of the treatment is very low. The increase in V150 and V200 has not produced an increase in vaginal mucosa toxicity, and the doses in the OAR are lower than in the plans implemented for HDRBT with Ir-192 or Co-60. eBT is a good alternative to treat endometrial cancer in centres without conventional HDR availability. To date, there are limited published studies reporting on outcomes from patients treated with eBT.
Collapse
|
16
|
Manger R, Rahn D, Hoisak J, Dragojević I. Improving the treatment planning and delivery process of Xoft electronic skin brachytherapy. Brachytherapy 2018; 17:702-708. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2018.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2018] [Revised: 03/12/2018] [Accepted: 04/09/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
17
|
Kim JY, Kozlow JH, Mittal B, Moyer J, Olencki T, Rodgers P, Bichakjian C, Armstrong A, Baum C, Bordeaux JS, Brown M, Busam KJ, Eisen DB, Iyengar V, Lober C, Margolis DJ, Messina J, Miller A, Miller S, Mostow E, Mowad C, Nehal K, Schmitt-Burr K, Sekulic A, Storrs P, Teng J, Yu S, Huang C, Boyer K, Begolka WS, Alam M. Guidelines of care for the management of basal cell carcinoma. J Am Acad Dermatol 2018; 78:540-559. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 192] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2017] [Revised: 10/02/2017] [Accepted: 10/02/2017] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
|
18
|
Guinot JL, Rembielak A, Perez-Calatayud J, Rodríguez-Villalba S, Skowronek J, Tagliaferri L, Guix B, Gonzalez-Perez V, Valentini V, Kovacs G. GEC-ESTRO ACROP recommendations in skin brachytherapy. Radiother Oncol 2018; 126:377-385. [PMID: 29455924 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.01.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 108] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2017] [Accepted: 01/18/2018] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this publication is to compile available literature data and expert experience regarding skin brachytherapy (BT) in order to produce general recommendations on behalf of the GEC-ESTRO Group. METHODS We have done an exhaustive review of published articles to look for general recommendations. RESULTS Randomized controlled trials, systemic reviews and meta-analysis are lacking in literature and there is wide variety of prescription techniques successfully used across the radiotherapy centers. BT can be delivered as superficial application (also called contact BT or plesiotherapy) or as interstitial for tumours thicker than 5 mm within any surface, including very irregular. In selected cases, particularly in tumours located within curved surfaces, BT can be advantageous modality from dosimetric and planning point of view when compared to external beam radiotherapy. The general rule in skin BT is that the smaller the target volume, the highest dose per fraction and the shortest overall length of treatment can be used. CONCLUSION Skin cancer incidence is rising worldwide. BT offers an effective non-invasive or minimally invasive and relative short treatment that particularly appeals to elder and frail population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jose L Guinot
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Foundation Instituto Valenciano de Oncologia (I.V.O.), Valencia, Spain
| | - Agata Rembielak
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Jose Perez-Calatayud
- Department of Radiation Oncology, La Fe University Hospital-IRIMED, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Janusz Skowronek
- Brachytherapy Department, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznań, Poland; Electroradiology Department, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poland
| | - Luca Tagliaferri
- Polo Scienze Oncologiche ed Ematologiche, Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, Rome, Italy
| | - Benjamin Guix
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Foundation IMOR, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Victor Gonzalez-Perez
- Department of Radiation Physics, Foundation Instituto Valenciano de Oncologia (I.V.O.), Valencia, Spain
| | - Vincenzo Valentini
- Polo Scienze Oncologiche ed Ematologiche, Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, Rome, Italy
| | - György Kovacs
- Interdisciplinary Brachytherapy Unit, UKSH CL, Lübeck, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
The feasibility of using ultrasound during follow-up for superficial non-melanoma skin cancers after electronic brachytherapy. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2017; 9:535-539. [PMID: 29441097 PMCID: PMC5807995 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2017.72358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2017] [Accepted: 11/10/2017] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSCs) can be treated with a number of modalities including surgery, topical chemotherapy, or radiotherapy. Amongst the radiotherapeutic options, electronic brachytherapy (eBT) is an appealing treatment as it is usually given in a few fractions, it leads to good outcomes, and is increasingly being used. However, currently no follow-up imaging is routinely used or recommended to evaluate treatment response of NMSC. We aimed to use ultrasound (US) in follow-up after eBT for superficial NMSC to assess its feasibility in detecting possible tumor response. Material and methods Fourteen patients were treated between 2013-2015 for a NMSC using eBT. US guidance was used for treatment planning prior to eBT initiation. After completion of eBT, patients were seen in follow-up for both clinical exam and a repeat US at 1 month to evaluate if tumor response was detectable. Results Of the 14 patients, 6 were male and 8 were female. The mean age was 71 years. With a median follow-up of 20.5 months, all patients had a complete response based on physical exam. Eleven patients appeared to have a complete response based on US obtained > 1 month after completing eBT. To date, there have been no local recurrences or progression, and all patients are alive. Conclusions US is an objective imaging modality that may be able to assess NMSC response after eBT. Based on follow-up imaging, further treatment or observation may be recommended. Although this study is hypothesis generating, larger studies with pathologic confirmation of recurrences would be needed to validate US use for follow-up, avoiding possible painful and scarring biopsies in case of low suspicion of recurrence.
Collapse
|
20
|
Skowronek J. Current status of brachytherapy in cancer treatment - short overview. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2017; 9:581-589. [PMID: 29441104 PMCID: PMC5808003 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2017.72607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 88] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2017] [Accepted: 12/12/2017] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Cancer incidence and mortality depend on a number of factors, including age, socio-economic status and geographical location, and its prevalence is growing around the world. Most of cancer treatments include external beam radiotherapy or brachytherapy. Brachytherapy, a type of radiotherapy with energy from radionuclides inserted directly into the tumor, is increasingly used in cancer treatment. For cervical and skin cancers, it has become a standard therapy for more than 100 years as well as an important part of the treatment guidelines for other malignancies, including head and neck, skin, breast, and prostate cancers. Compared to external beam radiotherapy, brachytherapy has the potential to deliver an ablative radiation dose over a short period of time directly to the altered tissue area with the advantage of a rapid fall-off in dose, and consequently, sparing of adjacent organs. As a result, the patient is able to complete the treatment earlier, and the risks of occurrence of another cancer are lower than in conventional radiotherapy treatment. Brachytherapy has increased its use as a radical or palliative treatment, and become more advanced with the spread of pulsed-dose-rate and high-dose-rate afterloading machines; the use of new 3D/4D planning systems has additionally improved the quality of the treatment. The aim of the present study was to present short summaries of current studies on brachytherapy for the most frequently diagnosed tumors. Data presented in this manuscript should help especially young physicians or physicists to explore and introduce brachytherapy in cancer treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janusz Skowronek
- Brachytherapy Department, Greater Poland Cancer Center
- Electroradiology Department, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Zaorsky NG, Lee CT, Zhang E, Keith SW, Galloway TJ. Hypofractionated radiation therapy for basal and squamous cell skin cancer: A meta-analysis. Radiother Oncol 2017; 125:13-20. [PMID: 28843727 PMCID: PMC7534946 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.08.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2017] [Revised: 07/21/2017] [Accepted: 08/07/2017] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To characterize the cosmetic outcomes and local recurrence (LR) rates of various hypofractionated radiation therapy (RT) regimens for skin basal and squamous cell cancers (BCCs/SCCs). METHODS A PICOS/PRISMA/MOOSE selection protocol was performed to identify 344 articles published between 1985-2016 evaluating patients with T1-2 N0 SCCs/BCCs treated with definitive RT. Biologically equivalent doses with α/β=3 (BED3s) were calculated. The primary endpoint was post-treatment cosmesis. Mixed effects regression models were used to estimate weighted linear relationships between BED3 and cosmetic outcomes. RESULTS A total of 21 studies were identified detailing the treatment of 9729 skin BCC/SCC patients, across seven countries, with external beam RT (n=9255) or brachytherapy (n=474). Median follow-up was 36months (range: 12-77). Median dose was 45Gy/11 fractions (interquartile range: 37.5Gy/6-55Gy/18) at 4Gy/fraction (interquartile range: 2.5-6Gy); most hypofractionated 18.75Gy/1. There was a trend to decreased "good" cosmesis with higher total dose: -3.4% "good" cosmesis/10Gy BED3, p=0.01. Similarly, there was a trend to increased "fair" cosmesis with higher dose: +3.8% "fair" cosmesis/10Gy BED3,p=0.006. At a BED3 of 100Gy, the expected rate of "good" cosmesis is 79% (95% confidence interval: 70%, 88%). Hypofractionated schedules produced similar cosmesis to conventionally fractionated schedules, at the same BED3. Fewer than 8% of patients experienced "poor" cosmesis, independent of dose or fractionation regimen. CONCLUSION Hypofractionated RT has favorable cosmesis for patients with skin BCCs/SCCs. We recommend clinicians consider these commonly-used regimens, which all have BED3 of ∼100Gy: 50Gy/15 fractions, 36.75Gy/7 fractions, or 35Gy/5 fractions, as they result in "good" cosmesis in 80% of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas G Zaorsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, USA.
| | - Charles T Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Eddie Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Scott W Keith
- Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Division of Biostatistics, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Thomas J Galloway
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Ota K, Adar T, Dover L, Khachemoune A. Review: the reemergence of brachytherapy as treatment for non-melanoma skin cancer. J DERMATOL TREAT 2017; 29:170-175. [PMID: 28604229 DOI: 10.1080/09546634.2017.1341617] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Electronic brachytherapy (EBT) has seen a significant rise in use over the past few years in treating non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC). However, the current literature in EBT remains scarce. Existing data on high-dose rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) with surface applicators is often used to justify its efficacy and safety. In this review we study the two treatment modalities on their efficacy in treating NMSC and we explore the reasons behind the recent uprise in EBT. A literature review using PubMed was performed for articles published until January 2017 studying efficacy of HDR-BT and EBT for treating NMSC. HDR-BT demonstrated effective local control ranging from 96.2% to 100% up to 66 months of follow-up with acceptable cosmesis. For EBT, local control rates ranged from 90% to 100% with generally favorable tolerance and cosmesis outcome after roughly one year. While longer term data on EBT is needed, its short term efficacy shows promise as a possible alternative to surgery or other radiation therapy in a select group of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koji Ota
- a SUNY Downstate Medical Center , Brooklyn , NY , USA
| | - Tony Adar
- b Department of Dermatology , SUNY Downstate Medical Center , Brooklyn , NY , USA
| | - Laura Dover
- c Department of Radiation Oncology , University of Alabama at Birmingham , Birmingham , AL , USA
| | - Amor Khachemoune
- d Dermatology Service , Veterans Affairs Hospital & SUNY Downstate , Brooklyn , NY , USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Two years results of electronic brachytherapy for basal cell carcinoma. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2017; 9:251-255. [PMID: 28725249 PMCID: PMC5509982 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2017.68191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2017] [Accepted: 05/02/2017] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The use of radiation therapy (RT) for non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) has been changing throughout the last century. Over the last decades, the use of radiotherapy has surged with the development of new techniques, applicators, and devices. In recent years, electronic brachytherapy (eBT) devices that use small x-ray sources have been introduced as alternative to radionuclide dependence. Nowadays, several devices have been incorporated, with a few series reported, and with a short follow-up, due to the recent introduction of these systems. The purpose of this work is to describe the clinical results of our series after two years follow-up with a specific eBT system. Material and methods This is a prospective single-center, non-randomized pilot study, to assess clinical results of electronic brachytherapy in basal cell carcinoma using the Esteya® system. In 2014, 40 patients with 60 lesions were treated. Patient follow-up on a regular basis was performed for a period of two years. Results Twenty-six patients with 44 lesions achieved two years follow-up. A complete response was documented in 95.5% of cases. Toxicity was mild (G1 or G2) in all cases, caused by erythema, erosion, or alopecia. Cosmesis was excellent in 88.6% of cases, and good in the rest. Change in pigmentation was the most frequent cosmetic alteration. Conclusions This work is special, since the equipment’s treatment voltage was 69.5 kV, and this is the first prospective study with long term follow-up with Esteya®. These preliminary report show excellent results with less toxicity and excellent cosmesis. While surgery has been the treatment of choice, certain patients might benefit from eBT treatment. These are elderly patients with comorbidities or undergoing anticoagulant treatment as well as those who simply refuse surgery or might have other contraindications.
Collapse
|
24
|
Individualized 3D scanning and printing for non-melanoma skin cancer brachytherapy: a financial study for its integration into clinical workflow. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2017; 9:270-276. [PMID: 28725252 PMCID: PMC5509979 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2017.68134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2017] [Accepted: 04/15/2017] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Skin cancer is the most common tumor in the population. There are different therapeutic modalities. Brachytherapy is one of the techniques used, in which it is necessary to build customized moulds for some patients. Currently, these moulds are made by hand using rudimentary techniques. We present a new procedure based on 3D printing and the analysis of the clinical workflow. Material and methods Moulds can be made either by hand or by automated 3D printing. For making moulds by hand, a patient’s alginate negative is created and, from that, the gypsum cast and customized moulds are made by hand from the patient’s negative template. The new process is based on 3D printing. The first step is to take a 3D scan of the surface of the patient and then, 3D modelling software is used to obtain an accurate anatomical reconstruction of the treatment area. We present the clinical workflow using 3D scanning and printing technology, comparing its costs with the usual custom handmade mould protocol. Results The time spent for the new process is 6.25 hours, in contrast to the time spent for the conventional process, which is 9.5 hours. We found a 34% reduction in time required to create a mould for brachytherapy treatment. The labor cost of the conventional process is 211.5 vs. 152.5 hours, so the reduction is 59 hours. There is also a 49.5% reduction in the financial costs, mostly due to lack of need of a computed tomography (CT) scan of the gypsum and the mould. 3D scanning and printing offers financial benefits and reduces the clinical workload. Conclusions As the present project demonstrates, through the application of 3D printing technologies, the costs and time spent during the process in the clinical workload in brachytherapy treatment are reduced. Overall, 3D printing is a promising technique for brachytherapy that might be well received in the community.
Collapse
|
25
|
Does ultrasound measurement improve the accuracy of electronic brachytherapy in the treatment of superficial non-melanomatous skin cancer? J Contemp Brachytherapy 2017; 9:14-19. [PMID: 28344599 PMCID: PMC5346604 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2017.65476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2016] [Accepted: 12/19/2016] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Electronic brachytherapy (eBT) is a form of contact radiation therapy used for thin superficial non-melanomatous skin cancers (NMSCs). An accurate measurement of diameter and depth is important for eBT treatment planning. Therefore, we compared clinical measurements by an experienced physician to measurements obtained using ultrasound (US), an objective imaging modality, in order to determine if clinical measurements were accurate enough for adequate NMSC treatment. Material and methods Eighteen patients with 20 biopsy-proven NMSCs first had a clinical examination and then an US evaluation prior to starting eBT. One physician provided a clinical measurement for diameter and depth based on physical examination during radiation oncology consultation. The patients then had an US evaluation with a 14 or 18 MHz US unit, to determine both the diameter and depth measurements; eBT dose prescription was done using the US derived measurements. The clinical measurements and US measurements were compared using a t-test. Results Seventeen lesions were basal cell carcinoma and 3 lesions were squamous cell carcinoma. The most common location was the nose (10 lesions). The difference between the clinical and the US derived measurements for the second largest diameter was found to be statistically significant (p = 0.03), while the difference for the largest diameter of the lesions was not (p = 0.24). More importantly, the depth measurements obtained with US were also found to be significantly different from the clinical estimates (p = 0.02). All patients have had a complete response to therapy with a median follow-up of 24 months. Conclusions Statistically different measurements were obtained in 2 of 3 parameters used in choosing applicator size and prescription depth using an US assessment. The data presented suggests that US is a more objective modality than clinical judgment for determining superficial NMSC diameter and prescription depth for personalized eBT planning.
Collapse
|
26
|
Electronic brachytherapy management of atypical fibroxanthoma: report of 8 lesions. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2017; 9:158-160. [PMID: 28533805 PMCID: PMC5437075 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2017.65454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2016] [Accepted: 01/07/2017] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate the suitability of treating atypical fibroxanthoma (AFX), an uncommon skin malignancy, with electronic brachytherapy. Material and methods From Feb 2013 to Sep 2014, we were referred a total of 8 cases of AFX in 7 patients, all involving the scalp. All of them were treated with electronic brachytherapy 50 Kev radiations (Xoft Axxent®, Fremont, California). All lesions received 40 Gy in two fractions per week with 5mm margins. Results At a median follow-up of 23.7 months, the local recurrence rate is 12.5%. The single lesion that failed was not debulked surgically prior to electronic brachytherapy. Conclusions To our knowledge, this is the first report in the literature on the use of radiation therapy as curative primary treatment for AFX. No contraindication to the use of radiations is found in the literature, with surgery being the sole treatment for AFX noted. Our recurrence rate is 0% for debulked lesions. Risk of recurrence is mitigated with surgical debulking prior to brachytherapy. Electronic brachytherapy appears to be a safe and effective treatment for debulked AFX. Multiple excisions, skin grafting, and wound care can be avoided in elderly patients by the use of electronic brachytherapy.
Collapse
|
27
|
Delishaj D, Rembielak A, Manfredi B, Ursino S, Pasqualetti F, Laliscia C, Orlandi F, Morganti R, Fabrini MG, Paiar F. Non-melanoma skin cancer treated with high-dose-rate brachytherapy: a review of literature. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2016; 8:533-540. [PMID: 28115960 PMCID: PMC5241375 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2016.64112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2016] [Accepted: 11/01/2016] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The incidence of non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) has been increasing over the past 30 years. There are different treatment options and surgical excision is the most frequent treatment due to its low rates of recurrence. Radiotherapy is an effective alternative of surgery, and brachytherapy (BT) might be a better therapeutic option due to high radiation dose concentration to the tumor with rapid dose fall-off resulting in normal tissues sparing. The aim of this review was to evaluate the local control, toxicity, and cosmetic outcomes in NMSC treated with high-dose-rate BT (HDR-BT). MATERIAL AND METHODS In May 2016, a systematic search of bibliographic database of PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library with a combination of key words of "skin cancer", "high dose rate brachytherapy", "squamous cell carcinoma", "basal cell carcinoma", and "non melanoma skin cancer" was performed. In this systematic review, we included randomized trials, non-randomized trials, prospective and retrospective studies in patients affected by NMSC treated with HDR-BT. RESULTS Our searches generated a total of 85 results, and through a process of screening, 10 publications were selected for the review. Brachytherapy was well tolerated with acceptable toxicity and high local control rates (median: 97%). Cosmetic outcome was reported in seven study and consisted in an excellent and good cosmetic results in 94.8% of cases. CONCLUSIONS Based on the review data, we can conclude that the treatment of NMSC with HDR-BT is effective with excellent and good cosmetics results, even in elderly patients. The hypofractionated course appears effective with very good local disease control. More data with large-scale randomized controlled trials are needed to assess the efficacy and safety of brachytherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Durim Delishaj
- Department of Translational Medicine, Division of Radiation Oncology – University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Agata Rembielak
- Clinical Oncologist, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M20 4BX, United Kingdom
| | - Bruno Manfredi
- Department of Translational Medicine, Division of Radiation Oncology – University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Stefano Ursino
- Department of Translational Medicine, Division of Radiation Oncology – University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Francesco Pasqualetti
- Department of Translational Medicine, Division of Radiation Oncology – University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Concetta Laliscia
- Department of Translational Medicine, Division of Radiation Oncology – University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Francesca Orlandi
- Department of Translational Medicine, Division of Radiation Oncology – University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Riccardo Morganti
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Section of Statistics – University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Maria Grazia Fabrini
- Department of Translational Medicine, Division of Radiation Oncology – University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Fabiola Paiar
- Department of Translational Medicine, Division of Radiation Oncology – University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Likhacheva AO, Devlin PM, Shirvani SM, Barker CA, Beron P, Bhatnagar A, Doggett SW, Hochman L, Hsu C, Kasper M, Keisch M, Mutyala S, Prestidge B, Rodriguez Villalba S, Shukla V, Sundararaman S, Kamrava M. Skin surface brachytherapy: A survey of contemporary practice patterns. Brachytherapy 2016; 16:223-229. [PMID: 27908679 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2016.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2016] [Revised: 10/14/2016] [Accepted: 10/21/2016] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to define current patterns of care among radiation oncologists who use skin surface brachytherapy for the treatment of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) and basal cell carcinoma (BCC) in academic and community settings. METHODS AND MATERIALS A 30-question electronic survey was administered to clinician members of the American Brachytherapy Society. The respondents were asked to provide details regarding their clinical practice and their approach to skin surface brachytherapy. RESULTS A total of 16 surveys were returned. Among the respondents, aggregate experience varied from 8 to 1800 cases. Most preferred brachytherapy over external beam radiation because of shorter treatment course, conformality of treatment for irregular or curved targets, and shallow dose deposition. Of the total, 60% of respondents routinely estimated lesion depth via ultrasound before initiating treatment. Treatment margin on gross disease varied widely (range, 3-15 mm; median, 5 mm). Hypofractionation was the preferred dose schedule. Prescribed doses ranged from 30 Gy in five fractions to 64 Gy in 32 fractions (EQD2, 40 Gy-65 Gy). There was a tendency to increase the number of fractions for larger targets, although some used the same fractionation regardless of anatomic location or lesion size. There was no consensus on dosimetric constraints, and some respondents reported cases of severe toxicity, particularly when treating the pretibial skin. CONCLUSIONS This pattern of care study suggests that skin brachytherapy can be a convenient and safe tool for treatment of BCC and cSCC. Prospective trials and the development of expert consensus guidelines would be beneficial for optimizing skin surface brachytherapy and reducing practice variation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna O Likhacheva
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, AZ.
| | - Phillip M Devlin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Shervin M Shirvani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, AZ
| | - Christopher A Barker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Phillip Beron
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Ajay Bhatnagar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, 21st Century Oncology, Phoenix, AZ
| | | | - Lawrence Hochman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Florida Cancer Affiliates, Trinity, FL
| | - Charles Hsu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ
| | - Michael Kasper
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Boca Raton Regional Hospital, Boca Raton, FL
| | - Martin Keisch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Healthcare Associated, Miami, FL
| | - Subhakar Mutyala
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Arizona Cancer Center at Dignity Health St. Joseph's Hospital, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Bradley Prestidge
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Bon Secours Health System, Norfolk, VA
| | | | - Vershalee Shukla
- Department of Radiation Oncology, 21st Century Oncology, Phoenix, AZ
| | | | - Mitchell Kamrava
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Villalba SR, Perez-Calatayud MJ, Bautista JA, Carmona V, Celada F, Tormo A, García-Martinez T, Richart J, Ortega MS, Silla M, Ballester F, Perez-Calatayud J. Novel simple templates for reproducible positioning of skin applicators in brachytherapy. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2016; 8:344-8. [PMID: 27648089 PMCID: PMC5018523 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2016.61713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2016] [Accepted: 07/18/2016] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Esteya and Valencia surface applicators are designed to treat skin tumors using brachytherapy. In clinical practice, in order to avoid errors that may affect the treatment outcome, there are two issues that need to be carefully addressed. First, the selected applicator for the treatment should provide adequate margin for the target, and second, the applicator has to be precisely positioned before each treatment fraction. In this work, we describe the development and use of a new acrylic templates named Template La Fe-ITIC. They have been designed specifically to help the clinical user in the selection of the correct applicator, and to assist the medical staff in reproducing the positioning of the applicator. These templates are freely available upon request. MATERIAL AND METHODS Templates that were developed by University and Polytechnic Hospital La Fe (La Fe) and Hospital Clínica Benidorm (ITIC) in cooperation with Elekta, consist of a thin sheet made of transparent acrylic. For each applicator, a crosshair and two different circles are drawn on these templates: the inner one corresponds to the useful beam, while the outer one represents the external perimeter of the applicator. The outer circle contains slits that facilitate to draw a circle on the skin of the patient for exact positioning of the applicator. In addition, there are two perpendicular rulers to define the adequate margin. For each applicator size, a specific template was developed. RESULTS The templates have been used successfully in our institutions for more than 50 patients' brachytherapy treatments. They are currently being used for Esteya and Valencia applicators. CONCLUSIONS The template La Fe-ITIC is simple and practical. It improves both the set-up time and reproducibility. It helps to establish the adequate margins, an essential point in the clinical outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Vicente Carmona
- Radiotherapy Department, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia
| | - Francisco Celada
- Radiotherapy Department, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia
| | - Alejandro Tormo
- Radiotherapy Department, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia
| | | | - José Richart
- Radiotherapy Department, Clínica Benidorm, Benidorm
| | | | - Magda Silla
- Dermatology Department, Clínica Benidorm, Benidorm
| | - Facundo Ballester
- Department of Atomic, Molecular, and Nuclear Physics, University of Valencia, Burjassot, Spain
| | - Jose Perez-Calatayud
- Radiotherapy Department, Clínica Benidorm, Benidorm; Radiotherapy Department, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia
| |
Collapse
|