1
|
Dose Distribution of High Dose-Rate and Low Dose-Rate Prostate Brachytherapy at Different Intervals-Impact of a Hydrogel Spacer and Prostate Volume. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15051396. [PMID: 36900188 PMCID: PMC10000179 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15051396] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2023] [Revised: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 02/21/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2023] Open
Abstract
The study aimed to compare the dose distribution in permanent low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) and high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT), specifically focusing on the impact of a spacer and prostate volume. The relative dose distribution of 102 LDR-BT patients (prescription dose 145 Gy) at different intervals was compared with the dose distribution of 105 HDR-BT patients (232 HDR-BT fractions with prescription doses of 9 Gy, n = 151, or 11.5 Gy, n = 81). A hydrogel spacer (10 mL) was only injected before HDR-BT. For the analysis of dose coverage outside the prostate, a 5 mm margin was added to the prostate volume (PV+). Prostate V100 and D90 of HDR-BT and LDR-BT at different intervals were comparable. HDR-BT was characterized by a considerably more homogenous dose distribution and lower doses to the urethra. The minimum dose in 90% of PV+ was higher for larger prostates. As a consequence of the hydrogel spacer in HDR-BT patients, the intraoperative dose at the rectum was considerably lower, especially in smaller prostates. However, prostate volume dose coverage was not improved. The dosimetric results well explain clinical differences between these techniques reported in the literature review, specifically comparable tumor control, higher acute urinary toxicity rates in LDR-BT in comparison to HDR-BT, decreased rectal toxicity after spacer placement, and improved tumor control after HDR-BT in larger prostate volumes.
Collapse
|
2
|
Takakusagi Y, Oike T, Kano K, Anno W, Tsuchida K, Mizoguchi N, Serizawa I, Yoshida D, Katoh H, Kamada T. Prostate-specific antigen dynamics after neoadjuvant androgen-deprivation therapy and carbon ion radiotherapy for prostate cancer. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0241636. [PMID: 33156884 PMCID: PMC7647067 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241636] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2020] [Accepted: 10/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background This study aimed to explain the dynamics of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels in patients with prostate cancer who were treated with carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) and neoadjuvant androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT). Methods Eighty-five patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer who received CIRT and neoadjuvant ADT from December 2015 to December 2017 were analyzed in the present study. The total dose of CIRT was set at 51.6 Gy (relative biological effectiveness) delivered in 12 fractions over 3 weeks. The PSA bounce was defined as a ≥0.4 ng/ml increase of PSA levels from the nadir, followed by any decrease. PSA failure was defined using the Phoenix criteria. Results The median patient age was 68 (range, 48–81) years. The median follow-up duration was 33 (range, 20–48) months. The clinical T stage was T1c, T2a, and T2b in 27, 44, and 14 patients, respectively. The Gleason score was 6 in 3 patients and 7 in 82 patients. The median pretreatment PSA level was 7.37 (range, 3.33–19.0) ng/ml. All patients received neoadjuvant ADT for a median of 6 (range, 2–117) months. PSA bounces were observed in 39 patients (45.9%), occurring a median of 12 (range, 6–30) months after CIRT. PSA failure was observed in eight patients (9.4%), occurring a median of 21 (range, 15–33) months after CIRT. The 3-year PSA failure-free survival rate was 88.5%. No clinical recurrence was observed during the follow-up period. Younger age and lower T stage were significant predictors of PSA bounce. Younger age was a significant predictor of PSA failure. Conclusions In this study, we identified the significant predictors of the occurrence of PSA bounce and failure. Further follow-up is needed to reveal the clinical significance of PSA dynamics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yosuke Takakusagi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Takahiro Oike
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan
| | - Kio Kano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Wataru Anno
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Keisuke Tsuchida
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Nobutaka Mizoguchi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Itsuko Serizawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Daisaku Yoshida
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Katoh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Tadashi Kamada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Darwis NDM, Oike T, Kubo N, Gondhowiardjo SA, Ohno T. Characteristics of PSA Bounce after Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer: A Meta-Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12082180. [PMID: 32764448 PMCID: PMC7465291 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12082180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2020] [Revised: 08/03/2020] [Accepted: 08/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The rate and characteristics of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) bounce post-radiotherapy remain unclear. To address this issue, we performed a meta-analysis. Reports of PSA bounce post-radiotherapy with a cutoff of 0.2 ng/mL were searched by using Medline and Web of Science. The primary endpoint was the occurrence rate, and the secondary endpoints were bounce characteristics such as amplitude, time to occurrence, nadir value, and time to nadir. Radiotherapy modality, age, risk classification, androgen deprivation therapy, and the follow-up period were extracted as clinical variables. Meta-analysis and univariate meta-regression were performed with random-effect modeling. Among 290 search-positive studies, 50 reports including 26,258 patients were identified. The rate of bounce was 31%; amplitude was 1.3 ng/mL; time to occurrence was 18 months; nadir value was 0.5 ng/mL; time to nadir was 33 months. Univariate meta-regression analysis showed that radiotherapy modality (29.7%), age (20.2%), and risk classification (12.2%) were the major causes of heterogeneity in the rate of bounce. This is the first meta-analysis of PSA bounce post-radiotherapy. The results are useful for post-radiotherapy surveillance of prostate cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Narisa Dewi Maulany Darwis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-22, Showa-machi, Maebashi, Gunma 371-8511, Japan; (N.D.M.D.); (N.K.); (T.O.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia—Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo National General Hospital, Jl. Diponegoro No. 71, Jakarta Pusat, DKI Jakarta 10430, Indonesia;
| | - Takahiro Oike
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-22, Showa-machi, Maebashi, Gunma 371-8511, Japan; (N.D.M.D.); (N.K.); (T.O.)
- Gunma University Heavy Ion Medical Center, 3-39-22, Showa-Machi, Maebashi, Gunma 371-8511, Japan
- Correspondence:
| | - Nobuteru Kubo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-22, Showa-machi, Maebashi, Gunma 371-8511, Japan; (N.D.M.D.); (N.K.); (T.O.)
- Gunma University Heavy Ion Medical Center, 3-39-22, Showa-Machi, Maebashi, Gunma 371-8511, Japan
| | - Soehartati A Gondhowiardjo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia—Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo National General Hospital, Jl. Diponegoro No. 71, Jakarta Pusat, DKI Jakarta 10430, Indonesia;
| | - Tatsuya Ohno
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-22, Showa-machi, Maebashi, Gunma 371-8511, Japan; (N.D.M.D.); (N.K.); (T.O.)
- Gunma University Heavy Ion Medical Center, 3-39-22, Showa-Machi, Maebashi, Gunma 371-8511, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Levin-Epstein R, Cook RR, Wong JK, Stock RG, Jeffrey Demanes D, Collins SP, Aghdam N, Suy S, Mantz C, Katz AJ, Nickols NG, Miszczyk L, Napieralska A, Namysl-Kaletka A, Prionas ND, Bagshaw H, Buyyounouski MK, Cao M, Mahal BA, Shabsovich D, Dang A, Yuan Y, Rettig MB, Chang AJ, Jackson WC, Spratt DE, Lehrer EJ, Zaorsky NG, Kupelian PA, Steinberg ML, Horwitz EM, Jiang NY, Kishan AU. Prostate-specific antigen kinetics and biochemical control following stereotactic body radiation therapy, high dose rate brachytherapy, and low dose rate brachytherapy: A multi-institutional analysis of 3502 patients. Radiother Oncol 2020; 151:26-32. [PMID: 32663537 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.07.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2020] [Revised: 07/02/2020] [Accepted: 07/06/2020] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), low dose rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) and high dose rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) are ablative-intent radiotherapy options for prostate cancer (PCa). These vary considerably in dose delivery, which may impact post-treatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) patterns and biochemical control. We compared PSA kinetics between SBRT, HDR-BT, and LDR-BT, and assessed their relationships to biochemical recurrence-free survival (BCRFS). METHODS AND MATERIALS Retrospective PSA data were analyzed for 3502 men with low-risk (n = 2223; 63.5%), favorable intermediate-risk (n = 869; 24.8%), and unfavorable intermediate-risk (n = 410; 11.7%) PCa treated with SBRT (n = 1716; 49.0%), HDR-BT (n = 512; 14.6%), or LDR-BT (n = 1274; 36.4%) without upfront androgen deprivation therapy at 10 institutions from 1990 to 2017. We compared nadir PSA (nPSA), time to nPSA, achievement of nPSA <0.2 ng/mL and <0.5 ng/mL, rates of nPSA <0.4 ng/mL at 4 years, and BCRFS. RESULTS Median follow-up was 72 months. Median nPSA and nPSA <0.2 ng/mL were stratified by risk group (interaction p ≤ 0.001). Median nPSA and time to nPSA were 0.2 ng/mL at 44 months after SBRT, 0.1-0.2 ng/mL at 37 months after HDR-BT, and 0.01-0.2 ng/mL at 51 months after LDR-BT (mean log nPSA p ≤ 0.009 for LDR-BT vs. SBRT or HDR-BT for low/favorable intermediate-risk). There were no differences in nPSA <0.4 ng/mL at 4 years (p ≥ 0.51). BCRFS was similar for all three modalities (p ≥ 0.27). Continued PSA decay beyond 4 years was predictive of durable biochemical control. CONCLUSION LDR-BT led to lower nPSAs with longer continued decay compared to SBRT and HDR-BT, but no differences in BCRFS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Levin-Epstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
| | - Ryan R Cook
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
| | - J Karen Wong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, United States
| | - Richard G Stock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States
| | - D Jeffrey Demanes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States; California Endocurietherapy Cancer Center, Oakland, United States
| | - Sean P Collins
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, United States
| | - Nima Aghdam
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, United States
| | - Simeng Suy
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, United States
| | | | - Alan J Katz
- FROS Radiation Oncology and Cyberknife Center, Flushing, United States
| | - Nicholas G Nickols
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States; Department of Radiation Oncology, West Los Angeles Veterans Health Administration, Los Angeles, United States
| | - Leszek Miszczyk
- Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology Gliwice Branch, Gliwice, Poland
| | - Aleksandra Napieralska
- Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology Gliwice Branch, Gliwice, Poland
| | - Agnieszka Namysl-Kaletka
- Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology Gliwice Branch, Gliwice, Poland
| | - Nicholas D Prionas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, United States
| | - Hilary Bagshaw
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, United States
| | - Mark K Buyyounouski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, United States
| | - Minsong Cao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
| | - Brandon A Mahal
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, United States
| | - David Shabsovich
- David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, United States
| | - Audrey Dang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tulane Medical Center, New Orleans, United States
| | - Ye Yuan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
| | - Matthew B Rettig
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States; Department of Medical Oncology, West Los Angeles Veterans Health Administration, Los Angeles, United States
| | - Albert J Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
| | - William C Jackson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
| | - Daniel E Spratt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
| | - Eric J Lehrer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States
| | - Nicholas G Zaorsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, United States
| | - Patrick A Kupelian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
| | - Michael L Steinberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
| | - Eric M Horwitz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, United States
| | - Naomi Y Jiang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
| | - Amar U Kishan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Takakusagi Y, Katoh H, Kano K, Anno W, Tsuchida K, Mizoguchi N, Serizawa I, Yoshida D, Kamada T. Preliminary result of carbon-ion radiotherapy using the spot scanning method for prostate cancer. Radiat Oncol 2020; 15:127. [PMID: 32460889 PMCID: PMC7254700 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-020-01575-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2020] [Accepted: 05/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) for prostate cancer was initiated at Kanagawa Cancer Center in 2015. The present study analyzed the preliminary clinical outcomes of CIRT for prostate cancer. METHODS The clinical outcomes of 253 patients with prostate cancer who were treated with CIRT delivered using the spot scanning method between December 2015 and December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. The irradiation dose was set at 51.6 Gy (relative biological effectiveness) delivered in 12 fractions over 3 weeks. Biochemical relapse was defined using the Phoenix definition. Toxicities were assessed according to CTCAE version 4.0. RESULTS The median patient age was 70 (47-86) years. The median follow-up duration was 35.3 (4.1-52.9) months. According to the D'Amico classification system, 8, 88, and 157 patients were classified as having low, intermediate, and high risks, respectively. Androgen deprivation therapy was administered in 244 patients. The biochemical relapse-free rate in the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups at 3 years was 87.5, 88.0, and 97.5%, respectively (P = 0.036). Grade 2 acute urinary toxicity was observed in 12 (4.7%) patients. Grade 2 acute rectal toxicity was not observed. Grade 2 late urinary toxicity and grade 2 late rectal toxicity were observed in 17 (6.7%) and 3 patients (1.2%), respectively. Previous transurethral resection of the prostate was significantly associated with late grade 2 toxicity in univariate analysis. The predictive factor for late rectal toxicity was not detected. CONCLUSION The present study demonstrated that CIRT using the spot scanning method for prostate cancer produces favorable outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yosuke Takakusagi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Asahi-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 241-8515, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Katoh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Asahi-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 241-8515, Japan.
| | - Kio Kano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Asahi-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 241-8515, Japan
| | - Wataru Anno
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Asahi-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 241-8515, Japan
| | - Keisuke Tsuchida
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Asahi-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 241-8515, Japan
| | - Nobutaka Mizoguchi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Asahi-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 241-8515, Japan
| | - Itsuko Serizawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Asahi-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 241-8515, Japan
| | - Daisaku Yoshida
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Asahi-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 241-8515, Japan
| | - Tadashi Kamada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Asahi-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 241-8515, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Jiang NY, Dang AT, Yuan Y, Chu FI, Shabsovich D, King CR, Collins SP, Aghdam N, Suy S, Mantz CA, Miszczyk L, Napieralska A, Namysl-Kaletka A, Bagshaw H, Prionas N, Buyyounouski MK, Jackson WC, Spratt DE, Nickols NG, Steinberg ML, Kupelian PA, Kishan AU. Multi-Institutional Analysis of Prostate-Specific Antigen Kinetics After Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019; 105:628-636. [PMID: 31276777 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.06.2539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2019] [Revised: 05/17/2019] [Accepted: 06/17/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Understanding prostate-specific antigen (PSA) kinetics after radiation therapy plays a large role in the management of patients with prostate cancer (PCa). This is particularly true in establishing expectations regarding PSA nadir (nPSA) and PSA bounces, which can be disconcerting. As increasingly more patients are being treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for low- and intermediate-risk PCa, it is imperative to understand the PSA response to SBRT. METHODS AND MATERIALS PSA data from 5 institutions were retrospectively analyzed for patients with localized PCa treated definitively with SBRT alone from 2004 to 2016. Patients received 35 to 40 Gy in 5 fractions, per institutional standards. Patients who had less than 12 months of PSA data or received androgen deprivation therapy were excluded from this study. Linear and logistic multivariable analysis were performed to identify predictors of nPSA, bounce, and biochemical recurrence, and joint latent class models were developed to identify significant predictors of time to biochemical failure. RESULTS A total of 1062 patients were included in this study. Median follow-up was 66 months (interquartile range [IQR], 36.4-89.9 months). Biochemical failure per the Phoenix criteria occurred in 4% of patients. Median nPSA was 0.2 ng/mL, median time to nPSA was 40 months, 84% of patients had an nPSA ≤0.5 ng/mL, and 54% of patients had an nPSA ≤0.2 ng/mL. On multivariable analysis, nPSA was a significant predictor of biochemical failure. Benign PSA bounce was noted in 26% of patients. The median magnitude of PSA bounce was 0.52 ng/mL (IQR, 0.3-1.0 ng/mL). Median time to PSA bounce was 18.1 months (IQR, 12.0-31.1 months). On multivariable analysis, age and radiation dose were significantly associated with a lower incidence of bounce. Joint latent class models modeling found that nPSA and radiation dose were significantly associated with longer time to biochemical failure. CONCLUSIONS In this multi-institutional cohort of patients with long-term follow-up, we found that SBRT led to low nPSAs. In turn, lower nPSAs are associated with reduced incidence of, and longer time to, biochemical failure. Benign PSA bounces occurred in a quarter of patients, as late as several years after treatment. Further studies are needed to directly compare the PSA response of patients who receive SBRT versus other treatment modalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naomi Y Jiang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Audrey T Dang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Ye Yuan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Fang-I Chu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - David Shabsovich
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Christopher R King
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Sean P Collins
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC
| | - Nima Aghdam
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC
| | - Simeng Suy
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC
| | | | - Leszek Miszczyk
- Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology Gliwice Branch, Gliwice, Poland
| | - Aleksandra Napieralska
- Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology Gliwice Branch, Gliwice, Poland
| | - Agnieszka Namysl-Kaletka
- Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology Gliwice Branch, Gliwice, Poland
| | - Hilary Bagshaw
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Nicolas Prionas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Mark K Buyyounouski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - William C Jackson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Daniel E Spratt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Nicholas G Nickols
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Michael L Steinberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Patrick A Kupelian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Amar U Kishan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zimmermann JS, Osieka R, Bruns T, Hollberg H, Wiechmann B, Netzbandt O, Sablotny J, Malade M, Heitz M, Bernhardt F, Tiemann J, Wilkens M, Brüske T, Welker U, Heinemann V, Zimmermann P, de la Maza SF, Pfeiffer D, Tauber PR, Thomas D, Moustakis C. Five-year effectiveness of low-dose-rate brachytherapy: comparisons with nomogram predictions in patients with non-metastatic prostate cancer presenting significant control of intra- and periprostatic disease. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2018; 10:297-305. [PMID: 30237813 PMCID: PMC6142645 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2018.77949] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2018] [Accepted: 08/24/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the effectiveness of low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy in patients with localized prostate cancer and to compare the outcome with predictions from Kattan and Partin nomograms at 60 months after seed implantation. MATERIAL AND METHODS One thousand, one hundred and eighty-seven patients with localized prostate cancer at low-, intermediate-, or high-risk of progression received LDR brachytherapy using iodine-125 seeds with curative intent, applied as monotherapy or in combination with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), and/or androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). At 60 months after seed implantation, data of 1,064 patients (1,058 alive + 6 who died of prostate cancer) were analyzed for biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS) based on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels using the Phoenix definition. Five-year bPFS probabilities were determined for various risk group classifications (d'Amico, Mt. Sinai, MSKCC/Seattle, NCCN). Outcomes were also compared to patient-individualized nomogram predictions of 5-year bPFS (Kattan 2002) and probability of organ-confined disease (Kattan 2002, Partin 2007). RESULTS Overall, 93.3% (993/1,064) of the patients were free of biochemical progression within 5 years, while the average 5-year bPFS probability according to the Kattan nomogram was significantly lower (85%, p < 0.001). Outcomes were significantly better than Kattan nomogram predictions in the subgroup of patients with monotherapy as well as in patients additionally treated with EBRT. Comparison of the overall outcome with nomogram predictions for organ-confined disease (Kattan nomogram: 50%; Partin nomogram: 65%) revealed a significant probability of LDR brachytherapy to destroy periprostatic tumor spread (p < 0.001) in all risk group constellations, even in high-risk patients. CONCLUSIONS The results indicate high effectiveness of LDR brachytherapy in all risk groups, significantly better than predicted with the Kattan nomogram in most subgroups. The significant superiority of LDR brachytherapy compared to nomogram predictions of organ-confined disease suggests that LDR brachytherapy effectively controls both intra- and periprostatic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jörg S Zimmermann
- Praxis für Brachytherapie, Praxiszentrum Alstertal, Hamburg
- Katholisches Marienkrankenhaus, Hamburg
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Dorothea Thomas
- Praxis für Brachytherapie, Praxiszentrum Alstertal, Hamburg
- Katholisches Marienkrankenhaus, Hamburg
| | - Christos Moustakis
- Praxis für Brachytherapie, Praxiszentrum Alstertal, Hamburg
- Katholisches Marienkrankenhaus, Hamburg
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Abteilung Medizinische Physik, Universitätsklinik Münster, Germany
| |
Collapse
|