|
1
|
Gutierrez JA, Shannon CM, Nguyen SA, Meyer TA, Lambert PR. Comparison of Quality of Life Outcomes for Percutaneous Versus Transcutaneous Implantable Hearing Devices: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Otol Neurotol 2024; 45:e129-e136. [PMID: 38270194 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000004111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare quality of life (QOL) outcomes of percutaneous and transcutaneous bone conduction devices (pBCD and tBCD, respectively). DATABASES REVIEWED Pubmed, Scopus, CINAHL. METHODS A systematic review was performed searching for English language articles from inception to March 15, 2023. Studies reporting QOL outcomes measured using a validated tool following implantation of either pBCDs or tBCDs were considered for inclusion. QOL outcomes included scores for Glasgow Benefit Inventory, Glasgow Children's Benefit Inventory, Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit, and the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale. A meta-analysis of continuous measures was performed. RESULTS A total of 52 articles with 1,469 patients were included. Six hundred eighty-nine patients were implanted with pBCDs, and the remaining 780 were implanted with tBCDs. Average Glasgow Benefit Inventory scores for the tBCD group (33.0, 95% confidence interval [22.7-43.3]) were significantly higher than the pBCD group (30.9 [25.2-36.6]) (Δ2.1 [1.4-2.8], p < 0.0001). Mean Glasgow Children's Benefit Inventory scores (Δ3.9 [2.0-5.8], p = 0.0001) and mean gain in Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit scores (Δ5.6 [4.8-6.4], p < 0.0001) were significantly higher among patients implanted with tBCDs than those implanted with pBCDs. Patients implanted with tBCDs also had significantly higher gains on the Speech (Δ1.1 [0.9-1.3], p < 0.0001), Spatial (Δ0.8 [0.7-0.9], p < 0.0001), and Qualities of Hearing (Δ1.2 [1.1-1.3], p < 0.0001) portions of the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale than those implanted with pBCDs. CONCLUSIONS Patients implanted with transcutaneous devices had better QOL outcomes than those implanted with percutaneous devices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jorge A Gutierrez
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Bruschini L, Canzi P, Canale A, Covelli E, Laborai A, Monteforte M, Cinquini M, Barbara M, Beltrame MA, Bovo R, Castigliano B, De Filippis C, Della Volpe A, Dispenza F, Marsella P, Mainardi A, Orzan E, Piccirillo E, Ricci G, Quaranta N, Cuda D. Implantable hearing devices in clinical practice. Systematic review and consensus statements. ACTA OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGICA ITALICA : ORGANO UFFICIALE DELLA SOCIETA ITALIANA DI OTORINOLARINGOLOGIA E CHIRURGIA CERVICO-FACCIALE 2024; 44:52-67. [PMID: 38165206 PMCID: PMC10914359 DOI: 10.14639/0392-100x-n2651] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2023] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
Objective Implantable hearing devices represent a modern and innovative solution for hearing restoration. Over the years, these high-tech devices have increasingly evolved but their use in clinical practice is not universally agreed in the scientific literature. Congresses, meetings, conferences, and consensus statements to achieve international agreement have been made. This work follows this line and aims to answer unsolved questions regarding examinations, selection criteria and surgery for implantable hearing devices. Materials and methods A Consensus Working Group was established by the Italian Society of Otorhinolaryngology. A method group performed a systematic review for each single question to identify the current best evidence on the topic and to guide a multidisciplinary panel in developing the statements. Results Twenty-nine consensus statements were approved by the Italian Society of Otorhinolaryngology. These were associated with 4 key area subtopics regarding pre-operative tests, otological, audiological and surgical indications. Conclusions This consensus can be considered a further step forward to establish realistic guidelines on the debated topic of implantable hearing devices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Bruschini
- Otolaryngology, ENT Audiology and Phoniatrics Unit, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Pietro Canzi
- Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Pavia, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Andrea Canale
- Division of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Edoardo Covelli
- Department of Neuroscience, Mental Health and Sensory Organs, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Laborai
- Department of Otolaryngology, Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital, Piacenza, Italy
| | - Marta Monteforte
- Laboratory of systematic review methodology and guidelines production, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Michela Cinquini
- Laboratory of systematic review methodology and guidelines production, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Maurizio Barbara
- Department of Neuroscience, Mental Health and Sensory Organs, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Millo Achille Beltrame
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Pavia, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Roberto Bovo
- Department of Neuroscience DNS, Otolaryngology Section, Padua University, Padua, Italy
| | - Bruno Castigliano
- Division of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Cosimo De Filippis
- Department of Neuroscience, Audiology Section, University of Padua, Treviso, Italy
| | - Antonio Della Volpe
- Otology and Cochlear Implant Unit, Santobono-Pausilipon Children’s Hospital, Naples, Italy
| | - Francesco Dispenza
- Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico ‘’Paolo Giaccone’’, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Pasquale Marsella
- Audiology and Otosurgery Department, “Bambino Gesù” Children’s Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Anna Mainardi
- Department of Otolaryngology, Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital, Piacenza, Italy
| | - Eva Orzan
- ENT and Audiology Unit, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”, Trieste, Italy
| | | | - Giampietro Ricci
- Department of Surgical and Biomedical Sciences, Section of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Nicola Quaranta
- Translational Biomedicine and Neurosciences Department, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Domenico Cuda
- Department of Otolaryngology, Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital, Piacenza, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
|
3
|
Lazzerini F, Bruschini L, Fiacchini G, Canzi P, Berrettini S, Forli F. The Role of Bone-Anchored Hearing Devices and Remote Microphones in Children with Congenital Unilateral Hearing Loss. Brain Sci 2023; 13:1379. [PMID: 37891748 PMCID: PMC10605185 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13101379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2023] [Revised: 09/16/2023] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Congenital unilateral hearing loss (UHL) represents a contemporary audiologic challenge. Children with UHL can struggle with understanding speech in noise, localizing sounds, developing language, and maintaining academic performance, leading to low self-esteem, anxiety, and decreased social support. Two specific conditions related to UHL in children are single-sided deafness (SSD) and unilateral auris atresia (UAA). This was a retrospective observational study on a group of children with UHL. The Simplified Italian Matrix Sentence Test was used for the assessment of speech reception threshold (SRT) in different conditions: speech and noise from the front (S0N0), speech at 45° from the side of the better ear and noise at 45° from the opposite side (SbNw), and vice versa (SwNb). Each test was conducted unaided, with a bone-anchored hearing device (BAHD), and with a remote microphone (RM) system. The use of a BAHD and RM led to an improvement in SRT in S0N0 and SwNb conditions. The SSD subgroup demonstrated significant benefits with both devices in SwNb, and the UAA subgroup from the use of BAHD in S0N0. In conclusion, the study underscores the potential benefits of both devices in enhancing speech perception for UHL children, providing insights into effective intervention strategies for these challenging cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Lazzerini
- Otolaryngology, Audiology and Phoniatrics Unit, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (L.B.); (G.F.); (S.B.)
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy
| | - Luca Bruschini
- Otolaryngology, Audiology and Phoniatrics Unit, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (L.B.); (G.F.); (S.B.)
- Department of Surgical, Medical and Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy
| | - Giacomo Fiacchini
- Otolaryngology, Audiology and Phoniatrics Unit, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (L.B.); (G.F.); (S.B.)
- Department of Surgical, Medical and Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy
| | - Pietro Canzi
- Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Paediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy;
| | - Stefano Berrettini
- Otolaryngology, Audiology and Phoniatrics Unit, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (L.B.); (G.F.); (S.B.)
- Department of Surgical, Medical and Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy
- Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institute, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Francesca Forli
- Otolaryngology, Audiology and Phoniatrics Unit, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (L.B.); (G.F.); (S.B.)
- Department of Surgical, Medical and Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
|
4
|
Azevedo C, Breda M, Ribeiro D, Mar FM, Vilarinho S, Dias L. Functional and patient-reported outcomes of bone-anchored hearing aids (BAHA): A prospective case series study. J Otol 2023; 18:7-14. [PMID: 36820157 PMCID: PMC9937820 DOI: 10.1016/j.joto.2022.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2022] [Revised: 10/20/2022] [Accepted: 11/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective The purpose of this study was to evaluate the functional and patient-reported outcomes, and their correlation, after percutaneous bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) implantation. Methods A prospective study was conducted between January 2018 and December 2020 in a tertiary care center. All adult patients who were implanted with a percutaneous BAHA device during this evaluation period were included in the study. Complete auditory function and patients reported outcome measures (PROMs) were assessed in the preoperative period and 6 months after the implant activation. The PROMs included a generic form (Medical Outcome Study 36 Short Form Healthy Survey (MOS SF-36)), and three disease-specific forms (Hearing Handicap Inventory (HHI), Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life Scale (SADLS), and Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI)). Results Twenty-two patients with an average age of 53 years were included in the study. The overall functional gain with the BAHA in sound-field pure tone average (PTA) was 29 dB, with no statistically significant differences according to surgical indication (F(3,18) = 2.319, p = 0.110). The greater the preoperative air-bone gap, the greater the functional gain obtained (r = 0.505, p < 0.05). In the PROMs, we found a significant improvement in HHI scores (p < 0.005) and a significant increase in overall SADLS scores (p < 0.05) with the use of percutaneous BAHA devices. We did not verify any statistically significant correlation between functional and PROMs results. Conclusions The BAHA is a safe and effective alternative hearing rehabilitation option in selected patients. The PROMs results prove patient's overall satisfaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cátia Azevedo
- Corresponding author. Hospital de Braga, Sete Fontes – São Victor, 4710-243, Braga, Portugal.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|