The anal canal as a risk organ in cervical cancer patients with hemorrhoids undergoing whole pelvic radiotherapy

Pelvic floor dysfunction and its influencing factors during radiotherapy in cervical cancer survivors: A cross-sectional study

PURPOSE

Radiotherapy can negatively affect the pelvic floor function of patients with cervical cancer; however, the impact of different radiotherapy times and other related factors on pelvic floor function in cervical cancer survivors during radiotherapy remains unclear. We aimed to investigate the status of pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) in cervical cancer survivors during radiotherapy and to analyze the factors influencing PFD.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, a convenience sampling method was used to recruit cervical cancer survivors undergoing radiotherapy from January 2022 to July 2022 at a tertiary first-class hospital located in northeastern China. The Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-Short Form 20 was used for participants' self-report of their PFD during radiotherapy.

RESULTS

Data from 120 cervical cancer survivors were included in this study. The results showed that the mean PFDI-20 total score was 32.69 ± 7.76. Multiple stepwise linear regression analysis showed that 56.9% of the variance in PFD was explained by age (β = 0.25, p < 0.001), body mass index (β = 0.32, p < 0.001), recurrence (β = 0.29, p < 0.001), number of radiotherapy sessions (β = 0.39, p < 0.001), and number of deliveries (β = 0.35, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

It is important to pay more attention to the PFD status of cervical cancer survivors receiving radiotherapy. Future therapeutic approaches should involve early identification of relevant risk factors early to provide patients with personalized care at different stages of radiotherapy for reducing their discomfort and improving their health-related quality of life.

Aggravation of Hemorrhoids in Patients With Cervical Cancer Undergoing Radiotherapy: A Nationwide Population-based Study

BACKGROUND/AIM

Anal canal toxicity tends to be ignored in pelvic radiotherapy (RT). However, patients with hemorrhoids can be troubled by lower radiation dose. We tried to determine whether a correlation exists between hemorrhoids and anal symptoms in patients with cervical cancer undergoing RT.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The insurance claim data of patients who underwent definitive treatment for cervical cancer from 2015 to 2019 were analyzed. Adverse events including bleeding, proctitis, and hemorrhoids, were documented for 1 year after treatment completion. Odds ratios (ORs) were estimated by unconditional Poisson regression and adjusted for age, treatments, chemotherapy, and comorbidities.

RESULTS

Details of 67,114 insured cervical cancer patients treated between 2015 and 2019 were obtained. Among them, 5,919 patients with follow-up data for at least one year, treated with curative intent, were analyzed. The OR of the definitive radiotherapy group (DRT group) for anal bleeding was 10.57 higher than that of the operation alone group (surgical group) (p<0.01). Newly developed hemorrhoids gradually increased in the surgical group (3.17%), the postoperative radiotherapy group (5.38%), and the DRT group (7.58%). The OR of the DRT group for newly developed hemorrhoids was 2.38 higher than that of the surgical group (p<0.01), and ORs increased to 1.99 and 1.61 in patients that received chemotherapy and patients with diabetes, respectively (p<0.01).

CONCLUSION

Pelvic RT increased anal bleeding and symptomatic hemorrhoids. In particular, chemotherapy and diabetes also increased the risk. If patients with hemorrhoids receive pelvic RT, attention is required to prevent hemorrhoid aggravation.

Dose-volume analysis of predictors for acute anal toxicity after radiotherapy in prostate cancer patients

Background

This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and dosimetric factors predictive of acute anal toxicity (AAT) after radiotherapy in prostate cancer (PCa) patients with or without hemorrhoids.

Methods

We analyzed data from 347 PCa patients (248 cases treated from July 2013 to November 2017 for training cohort and 99 cases treated in 2018 for validation cohort) treated with pelvic radiotherapy at a single institution. Anal canal dose–volume histogram was used to determine the prescribed dose. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to evaluate the risk of AAT as a function of clinical and dosimetric factors.

Results

Totally, 39.5% (98/248) and 31.3% (31/99) of the PCa patients developed AAT in training and validation cohorts, respectively. The incidence of AAT was much higher in patients with hemorrhoids than in those without hemorrhoids in both training and validation cohorts. Hemorrhoids and volume received more than 20 Gy (V20) were valuated as independent factors for predicting AAT in training cohort. Similar results were also observed in our validation cohort. The combination of hemorrhoids and high anal canal V20 (> 74.93% as determined by ROC curves) showed the highest specificity and positive predictive values for predicting AAT in both training and validation cohorts.

Conclusions

AAT occurs commonly in PCa patients with hemorrhoids during and after pelvic radiotherapy. Hemorrhoids and anal canal V20 are independent predictors of AAT. These factors should be carefully considered during treatment planning to minimize the incidence of AAT.

Dosimetric planning study for the prevention of anal complications after post-operative whole pelvic radiotherapy in cervical cancer patients with hemorrhoids

OBJECTIVE

Radiation-induced anal toxicity can be induced by low radiation doses in patients with haemorrhoids. The object of this study was to determine the dosimetric benefits of different whole pelvic radiotherapy (WPRT) techniques in terms of dose delivered to the anal canal in post-operative patients with cervical cancer.

METHODS

The planning CT images of 10 patients with cervical cancer undergoing postoperative radiotherapy were used for comparison of three different plans. All patients had been treated using the conventional box technique WPRT (CV-WPRT), and we tried low-margin-modified WPRT (LM-WPRT), three-dimensional conformal techniques WPRT (CF-WPRT) and intensity-modulated WPRT (IM-WPRT) planning for dosimetric comparison of the anal canal, retrospectively.

RESULTS

Mean anal canal doses of the IM-WPRT were significantly lower (p < 0.05) than those of CV-WPRT, LM-WPRT and CF-WPRT, and V10, V20, V30 and V40 to the anal canal were also significantly lower for IM-WPRT (p < 0.05). The proportion of planning target volumes (PTVs) that received ≥98% of the prescribed dose for all plans was >99%, and the proportion that received ≥108% of the prescribed dose for IM-WPRT was <2%. Volumes of bladders and rectums that received ≥30 or ≥40 Gy were significantly lower for IM-WPRT than for three of the four-field WPRT plans (p = 0.000).

CONCLUSION

IM-WPRT can significantly reduce radiation dose delivered to the anal canal and does not compromise PTV coverage. In patients with haemorrhoids, IM-WPRT may be of value for the prevention of anal complications.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Although tolerance of the anal canal tends to be ignored in patients undergoing post-operative WPRT, patients with haemorrhoids may suffer complications at low radiation doses. The present study shows IM-WPRT can be meaningful in these patients.