Experience of Intensive Care Nurses in Assessment of Postoperative Pain in Patients with Hip Fracture and Dementia

A Scoping Review on Nurse's Pain Management of Older Patients with Dementia in a Hospital Environment

OBJECTIVES

Hospitalized persons living with dementia often experience unrelieved pain. Unmanaged pain during hospitalization has a significant negative effect on quality of life for persons living with dementia. Despite the central role of nurses in pain management, little is known about how nurses manage pain in this patient population in the hospital environment.

DESIGN

A scoping review explored the nurses' pain management practices when caring for persons living with dementia in a hospital setting.

DATA SOURCES AND REVIEW/ANALYSIS METHODS

After an extensive search for all available evidence on how nurses manage pain in hospitalized persons living with dementia, data were extracted on pain management methods that included assessment, intervention, effectiveness of pain management, and the barriers nurses encountered when managing pain. A descriptive content analysis was used to extract data from qualitative studies.

RESULTS

Six articles published between 2016 and 2021 met the inclusion criteria; four utilized qualitative methods, and the others used mixed-methods and quantitative study designs. A narrative description of the findings was summarized after data were categorized into pain management data elements and barriers nurses encountered when managing pain. Barriers were grouped into the subcategories of communication challenges (nurse to patient), information sharing (nurse to nurse), lack of knowledge, time constraints, and nursing stressors.

CONCLUSION

We identified six articles that met our inclusion criteria, highlighting a noticeable gap in the literature. Managing pain in this population is complex and lacks organizational support. Review findings indicate that pain management methods lack consistency and standardization, making it difficult to assess their effectiveness. Nurses also described knowledge deficits resulting in practice gaps that, when combined with barriers and challenges, result in underrecognized and undermanaged pain.

Pain Management in the Postoperative Period for People With Dementia: An Integrative Review

Objective

With the increased global prevalence of older people with dementia, more will present for surgery over the coming decades. Therefore, the objective of this study was to synthesize the existing research about how pain in managed for people with dementia in the postoperative period and discuss the implications for clinical practice.

Methods

For this integrative review, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health literature, Medline/Pubmed, ProQuest, ERIC, and Health Source Nursing were searched to identify original empirical research published between 2000 and 2021. Tasks were divided between reviewers to ensure independent study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment.

Results

Eleven articles were eligible. The evidence is incompletely developed therefore the review focused on pain assessment, the types and amount of pain relief, that people with dementia receive less analgesia than people without dementia and the challenges for effective pain management. Most studies were surgery for hip fracture so there is scope to look at outcomes for other types of surgery. Analgesia was administered but it was noted that even over a 20-year period, people with dementia received less than cognitively intact people. Pain management could have a stronger evidence-base with more psychometric development of pain assessment tools. Challenges are due to the impaired ability of the person with dementia to communicate pain and that clinicians have difficulty understanding pain behavior in people with dementia.

Conclusion

Adequate pain management for people with dementia in the postoperative period is important for a faster and better recovery.

A Systematic Review of Barriers and Facilitators of Pain Management in Persons with Dementia

Approximately 50% of persons living with dementia experience pain, yet it is frequently undetected and inadequately managed resulting in adverse consequences. This review aims to synthesize evidence on the barriers and facilitators of pain management in persons living with dementia. PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Web of Science datasets were used for article searching. Inclusion criteria were peer-reviewed original articles written in English that examined the barriers and facilitators of pain management for persons living with dementia. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used to evaluate the quality of the studies. A total of 26 studies were selected, including 18 qualitative and 3 quantitative (all high quality), as well as 5 mixed methods studies (low-to-high quality). Results were categorized into intrapersonal, interpersonal, environmental, and policy categories. Factors that impact pain management in dementia include cognitive and functional impairment, healthcare workers' knowledge, collaboration and communication, healthcare workers' understanding of patients' baseline behaviors, observation of behaviors, pain assessment tool use, pain management consistency, staffing level, pain guideline/policy, and training. Overall, pain management is challenging in persons living with dementia. The results indicate that there is a need for multi-component interventions that involves multidisciplinary teams to improve pain management in persons living with dementia at the intrapersonal, interpersonal, environmental, and policy levels. PERSPECTIVES: This review systematically synthesized barriers and facilitators of providing pain management in persons living with dementia. Results were presented in intrapersonal, interpersonal, environmental, and policy categories and suggests that multicomponent interventions involving multidisciplinary teams are needed to systematically improve pain management in persons living with dementia.

Are nurse`s needs assessment methods robust enough to recognise palliative care needs in people with dementia? A scoping review

BACKGROUND

People with dementia are most at risk of experiencing serious health related suffering, if they do not have a palliative care approach introduced early enough in the illness. It can be challenging for nurses to assess experienced needs of people, who are thought no longer able to self-report such as people with dementia. Assessment help to understand the care the patient and their family need promptly. It is unknown how nurses recognise holistic palliative care needs in people with dementia during routine care.

METHODS

Scoping review where EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycInfo databases, and references were searched with an advanced search strategy, which was built on three concepts (nurses, dementia, and nursing assessment) using corresponding Medical Subject Headings. Data were charted in a piloted extraction form, based on the assessment domains within the nursing process followed by summarise and synthesise results narratively.

RESULTS

37 out of 2,028 qualitative and quantitative articles published between 2000 and 2021, and relating to 2600 + nurses, were identified. Pain was sole focus of assessment in 29 articles, leaving 8 articles to describe assessment of additional needs (e.g., discomfort). Nurses working in a nursing home assess pain and other needs by observing the persons with dementia behaviour during routine care. Nurses in the acute care setting are more likely to assess symptoms with standard assessment tools at admission and evaluate symptoms by observational methods. Across settings, about one third of pain assessments are supported by person-centred pain assessment tools. Assessments were mostly triggered when the person with dementia vocalised discomfort or a change in usual behaviour was observed. Nurses rely on family members and colleagues to gain more information about needs experienced by people with dementia.

CONCLUSION

There is a scarcity of evidence about techniques and methods used by nurses to assess needs other than pain experienced by people with dementia. A holistic, person-centred screening tool to aid real-time observations at the bedside and used in conversations with health care professionals and families/friends, may improve need recognition other than pain, to ensure holistic needs could then be addressed timely to improve care in people with dementia.

Unsupervised Data Mining and Effect of Fast Rehabilitation Nursing Intervention in Fracture Surgery

At present, the most commonly used surgical treatment for fractures caused by external force injury is clinical, and unsupervised data mining is more advantageous in the face of the unknown format of perioperative network data. Therefore, this research aims to explore the application effect of unsupervised data mining in the concept of rapid rehabilitation nursing intervention after fracture surgery. 80 patients who underwent fracture surgery in the Department of Orthopedics of XXX Hospital were determined as the subjects, who were rolled into a research group (group R, 40 cases) and a control group (group C, 40 cases) by drawing lots. An unsupervised data mining algorithm based on unsupervised data mining for support vector machines (VDMSVMs) was proposed and applied to two groups of patients undergoing perioperative fracture surgery with the rapid rehabilitation nursing intervention and basic routine nursing. The results showed that the number of important features selected by the VDMSVM algorithm (5) was obviously more than that of the compressed edge fragment sampling (CEFS) algorithm (1) and the multicorrelation forward searching (MCFS) algorithm (2) (P < 0.05). The number of noise features screened by the VDMSVM algorithm (3) was much less in contrast to that of the CEFS algorithm and the MCFS algorithm, which was 8 and 10, respectively (P < 0.05). The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores of the fracture site at the 4th, 8th, 12th, and 16th hour after surgery in group R were all lower than the scores in group C (P < 0.05). The length of hospital stay (LoHS) in group R was greatly shorter than that in group C (P < 0.05). After different nursing methods, the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL-BREF) score of patients in group R (89.64 points) was greatly higher than the score in group C (61.45 points) (P < 0.05). The nursing satisfaction score of group R was 92.35 ± 3.65 points, and that in group C was 2.14 ± 1.25 points, respectively (P < 0.05). The test results verified the effectiveness of the feature selection of the VDMSVM algorithm. The rapid rehabilitation nursing intervention was conductive to reducing the postoperative pain of fracture patients, shortening the LoHS of patients, improving the quality of life (QOL) of fracture surgery patients, and increasing the patient's satisfaction with nursing.

Nurses' Experience of Nursing Workload-Related Issues during Caring Patients with Dementia: A Qualitative Meta-Synthesis

The behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD), which appear in all dementia patients, demand sizable commitments of time and effort from nurses. This study aims to identify issues related to the workloads of nurses who provide care for dementia patients via qualitative meta-synthesis. Eleven articles were selected using a systematic review flowchart, which were then evaluated for their quality using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program checklist. Collected data were analyzed using a line-of-argument method. Theme clusters were "increased workload due to characteristics of dementia", "increased mental stress", "difficulty associated with playing a mediator role in addition to nursing duties", and "lacking systematic support for dementia patient care". To reduce the workload and mental stress of nurses in dementia care, supportive measures appropriate for their occupational characteristics should be developed, based on workload estimates that account for the attributes of dementia patients.

Comparison of Periarticular Injection and Intra-articular Injection for Pain Management After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

Local infiltration analgesia, an essential component of multimodal analgesia after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), can be classified into periarticular injection (PAI) and intra-articular injection (IAI) as per administration techniques. Currently, there is no definite answer of the optimal choice between the two techniques. This meta-analysis aims to determine whether PAI provides superiority of pain relief and functional recovery than IAI after TKA.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

Comparative studies that compared PAI and IAI in patients after TKA were searched in the Embase, PubMed, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library databases. The primary outcomes were visual analog scale scores for pain and opioid consumption. The secondary outcomes were complications, function of recovery, and length of hospital stay.

FINDINGS

Four randomized controlled trials and two case-controlled studies with a total of 769 patients were enrolled. There were no significant differences in mean visual analog scale scores at postoperative day 0 (P = .17) and day 1 (P = .27), maximum visual analog scale scores at day 0 (P = .89) and day 1 (P = .82), total opioid consumption at day 1 (P = .96), opioid complications (P = .15), and length of hospital stay (P = .84) between PAI and IAI.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the available evidence, PAI does not offer superior effects at pain control and discharge than IAI after TKA. However, owing to the limited sample size and heterogeneity of the included studies, further large well-designed randomized controlled trials are still needed to validate this conclusion.

REGISTRATION

The protocol has been registered in the PROSPERO international database under number CRD42020165138.