Pyrazinamide susceptibility testing: proposed new standard with the BACTECTM MGITTM 960 system

Biphasic Medium Using Nicotinamide for Detection of Pyrazinamide Resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Reliable drug susceptibility testing of pyrazinamide (PZA) is technically difficult, since PZA activity is pH sensitive. The aim of this study was to evaluate a biphasic medium assay (BMA) for the reliable detection of PZA resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) using nicotinamide (NIC) as a surrogate for PZA and identifying the appropriate cut-off value for the assay. The PZA susceptibility of 122 multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) isolates and 39 drug-susceptible tuberculosis (DS-TB) isolates was examined using the BMA with NIC at four different concentrations (250, 500, 1000, and 2000 mg/L) and comparing the results with results from the BACTEC MGIT 960 reference method. Out of 122 MDR-TB isolates, 40 were identified as resistant by the BACTEC MGIT 960 system, of which 92.5% contained mutations within their pncA gene plus promoter region. A minimum inhibitory concentration of NIC ≥ 1000 mg/L was used as the cut-off concentration to define resistance in correlation with the MGIT 960 outcomes. NIC-BMA had a sensitivity of 90.91%, a specificity of 100%, and an accuracy of 97.52% compared with the MGIT 960 method. NIC-BMA is a promising assay to screen PZA resistance in microbiological laboratories without automation or advanced molecular instruments.

Global status of phenotypic pyrazinamide resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolates: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Pyrazinamide (PZA) is an essential first-line tuberculosis drug for its unique mechanism of action active against multidrug-resistant-TB (MDR-TB). Thus, the aim of updated meta-analysis was to estimate the PZA weighted pooled resistance (WPR) rate in M. tuberculosis isolates based on publication date and WHO regions. We systematically searched the related reports in PubMed, Scopus, and Embase (from January 2015 to July 2022). Statistical analyses were performed using STATA software. The 115 final reports in the analysis investigated phenotypic PZA resistance data. The WPR of PZA was 57% (95% CI 48-65%) in MDR-TB cases. According to the WHO regions, the higher WPRs of PZA were reported in the Western Pacific (32%; 95% CI 18-46%), South East Asian region (37%; 95% CI 31-43%), and the Eastern Mediterranean (78%; 95% CI 54-95%) among any-TB patients, high risk of MDR-TB patients, and MDR-TB patients, respectively. A negligible increase in the rate of PZA resistance were showed in MDR-TB cases (55% to 58%). The rate of PZA resistance has been rising in recent years among MDR-TB cases, underlines the essential for both standard and novel drug regimens development.

Using Reduced Inoculum Densities of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in MGIT Pyrazinamide Susceptibility Testing to Prevent False-Resistant Results and Improve Accuracy: A Multicenter Evaluation

The primary platform used for pyrazinamide (PZA) susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis is the MGIT culture system (Becton Dickinson). Since false-resistant results have been associated with the use of this system, we conducted a multicenter evaluation to determine the effect of using a reduced cell density inoculum on the rate of false resistance. Two reduced inoculum densities were compared with that prescribed by the manufacturer (designated as “BD” method). The reduced inoculum methods (designated as “A” and “C”) were identical to the manufacturer's protocol in all aspects with the exception of the cell density of the inoculum. Twenty genetically and phenotypically characterized M. tuberculosis isolates were tested in duplicate by ten independent laboratories using the three inoculum methods. False-resistant results declined from 21.1% using the standard “BD” method to 5.7% using the intermediate (“A”) inoculum and further declined to 2.8% using the most dilute (“C”) inoculum method. The percentages of the resistant results that were false-resistant declined from 55.2% for the “BD” test to 28.8% and 16.0% for the “A” and “C” tests, respectively. These results represent compelling evidence that the occurrence of false-resistant MGIT PZA susceptibility test results can be mitigated through the use of reduced inoculum densities.