1
|
Hikaka J, McCreedy EM, Jutkowitz E, McCarthy EP, Baier RR. Modifications of the readiness assessment for pragmatic trials tool for appropriate use with Indigenous populations. BMC Med Res Methodol 2024; 24:121. [PMID: 38822242 PMCID: PMC11140978 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-024-02244-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 05/14/2024] [Indexed: 06/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Inequities in health access and outcomes exist between Indigenous and non-Indigenous populations. Embedded pragmatic randomized, controlled trials (ePCTs) can test the real-world effectiveness of health care interventions. Assessing readiness for ePCT, with tools such as the Readiness Assessment for Pragmatic Trials (RAPT) model, is an important component. Although equity must be explicitly incorporated in the design, testing, and widespread implementation of any health care intervention to achieve equity, RAPT does not explicitly consider equity. This study aimed to identify adaptions necessary for the application of the 'Readiness Assessment for Pragmatic Trials' (RAPT) tool in embedded pragmatic randomized, controlled trials (ePCTs) with Indigenous communities. METHODS We surveyed and interviewed participants (researchers with experience in research involving Indigenous communities) over three phases (July-December 2022) in this mixed-methods study to explore the appropriateness and recommended adaptions of current RAPT domains and to identify new domains that would be appropriate to include. We thematically analyzed responses and used an iterative process to modify RAPT. RESULTS The 21 participants identified that RAPT needed to be modified to strengthen readiness assessment in Indigenous research. In addition, five new domains were proposed to support Indigenous communities' power within the research processes: Indigenous Data Sovereignty; Acceptability - Indigenous Communities; Risk of Research; Research Team Experience; Established Partnership). We propose a modified tool, RAPT-Indigenous (RAPT-I) for use in research with Indigenous communities to increase the robustness and cultural appropriateness of readiness assessment for ePCT. In addition to producing a tool for use, it outlines a methodological approach to adopting research tools for use in and with Indigenous communities by drawing on the experience of researchers who are part of, and/or working with, Indigenous communities to undertake interventional research, as well as those with expertise in health equity, implementation science, and public health. CONCLUSION RAPT-I has the potential to provide a useful framework for readiness assessment prior to ePCT in Indigenous communities. RAPT-I also has potential use by bodies charged with critically reviewing proposed pragmatic research including funding and ethics review boards.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna Hikaka
- Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
| | - Ellen M McCreedy
- Center for Long-Term Care Quality & Innovation, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA
- Department of Health Services, Policy & Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Eric Jutkowitz
- Department of Health Services, Policy & Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA
- Providence Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence VA, RI, USA
| | - Ellen P McCarthy
- Hinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of Gerontology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Rosa R Baier
- Center for Long-Term Care Quality & Innovation, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA
- Department of Health Services, Policy & Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fixed-Dose Combination (Polypill) for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention: A Meta-Analysis. Am J Prev Med 2022; 63:440-449. [PMID: 35613977 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2022.03.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2022] [Revised: 03/28/2022] [Accepted: 03/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This meta-analysis was performed to assess the efficacy of fixed-dose combination (polypill) in reducing the risk of mortality and cardiovascular events. METHODS Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central were searched during May 2021. All randomized trials investigating the efficacy of antihypertensive and lipid-lowering ± antiplatelet drug combinations in patients at cardiovascular risk were included. Outcomes were presented as risk ratios or standardized mean differences with 95% CIs. RESULTS A total of 16 trials (N = 26,567 participants) were included. The risk reduction for all-cause mortality (risk ratio = 0.90; 95% CI = 0.79, 1.01; I2 = 0%; moderate certainty) and major adverse cardiac events (risk ratio=0.84; 95% CI=0.68, 1.04; I2=51%; very low certainty) did not reach statistical significance in comparison with those of the control group. Subgroup analysis of studies that used an active control yielded similar results. However, significant reductions in major adverse cardiac event risk were observed in studies that exclusively targeted primary prevention, followed patients for ≥4 years, and had a low risk of bias. The polypill group had significantly higher adherence (risk ratio=1.18; 95% CI=1.06, 1.32; I2=96%; very low certainty) and comprable rates of adverse side effects (risk ratio=1.10; 95% CI=0.98, 1.23; I2=58%; moderate certainty) with those of the control group. Patients randomized to the polypill had significant reductions in systolic and diastolic blood pressure as well as in total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. DISCUSSION Despite reductions in cardiovascular risk factors, the observed mortality benefit for the polypill did not reach statistical significance. Further studies are needed to validate its clinical benefits and determine the patient populations likely to achieve such benefits.
Collapse
|
3
|
Meyer J, Fry C, Turner A, Razavi H. Intravitreal dexamethasone versus bevacizumab in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander patients with diabetic macular oedema: The
OASIS
study (a randomised control trial). Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2022; 50:522-533. [DOI: 10.1111/ceo.14079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2021] [Revised: 02/07/2022] [Accepted: 03/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Joos Meyer
- Lions Eye Institute Perth Western Australia Australia
- Lions Outback Vision Lions Eye Institute Broome Werstern Australia Australia
| | - Carly Fry
- Lions Eye Institute Perth Western Australia Australia
| | - Angus Turner
- Lions Eye Institute Perth Western Australia Australia
- Lions Outback Vision Lions Eye Institute Broome Werstern Australia Australia
- Centre for Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences University of Western Australia Perth Western Australia Australia
| | - Hessom Razavi
- Lions Eye Institute Perth Western Australia Australia
- Lions Outback Vision Lions Eye Institute Broome Werstern Australia Australia
- Centre for Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences University of Western Australia Perth Western Australia Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Beer K. Who's included? The role of the Clinical Research Nurse in enabling research participation for under-represented and under-served groups. J Res Nurs 2022; 27:143-154. [PMID: 35392191 PMCID: PMC8980581 DOI: 10.1177/17449871221077076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There is a global call for more inclusive clinical research that is representative of all populations, particularly those historically under-represented or under-served. A lack of broad representation results in disproportionate health outcomes and limits the applicability and translation of research findings. Aim Identify and describe barriers to participation across the research lifecycle and consider the role of the Clinical Research Nurse (CRN) in promoting inclusivity, including for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples within Australia. Discussion Review of recent literature and best practice identified barriers to research participation across the research process; at system, participant and practitioner levels. This discussion paper explores the role of the CRN; acting as enablers, facilitators and navigators, to mitigate participation barriers. Conclusion With their comprehensive understanding of the research process, clinical care pathways, reflective practices and participant-centred approaches, CRNs are uniquely positioned to advocate for greater equity in access to clinical research and to motivate stakeholders across the research enterprise to embed inclusive approaches in the design, conduct and dissemination of research. Implications for Practice An in-depth understanding of the research process, self, and cultural norms of the populations they serve is essential for CRNs to effectively advocate for equity in access to research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly Beer
- Clinical Research Manager, Perron Institute for Neurological and Translational Science; Murdoch University, Perth, WA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abbott P, Askew D, Watego C, Hu WC, Campbell L, Tyson C, Walsh R, Hussey S, Doyle K, Gunasekera H, Leach AJ, Usherwood T, Armstrong-Kearns J, Reath J. Randomised clinical trial research within Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander primary health services: a qualitative study. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e050839. [PMID: 34952874 PMCID: PMC8710871 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050839] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To better understand how to undertake valuable, ethical and sustainable randomised controlled clinical trial (RCT) research within Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander primary health services. DESIGN In a qualitative approach, we utilised data collected between 2013 and 2020 during the planning and implementation of two RCTs. The data comprised agreed records of research meetings, and semistructured interviews with clinical trial stakeholders. The stakeholders were parents/carers of child participants, and site-based research officers, healthcare providers and community advisory groups. Our thematic analysis was informed by constructivist grounded theory. SETTING The RCTs investigated the management of otitis media in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children, with the first RCT commencing recruitment in 2014 and the second in 2017. They took place in Aboriginal Medical Services (AMSs), large primary health services for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, based in urban and regional communities across two Australian states and one territory. RESULTS We analysed data from 56 meetings and 67 interviews, generating themes on making research valuable and undertaking ethical and sustainable RCTs. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander leadership, and support of AMSs in their service delivery function were critical. The broad benefits of the trials were considered important to sustainability, including workforce development, enhanced ear healthcare and multidirectional research capacity building. Participants emphasised the long-term responsibility of research teams to deliver benefits to AMSs and communities regardless of RCT outcomes, and to focus on relationships, reciprocity and creating positive experiences of research. CONCLUSION We identify principles and strategies to assist in undertaking ethical and sustainable RCTs within Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander primary health services. Maintaining relationships with AMSs and focusing on mutual workforce development and capacity building creates opportunities for long-term benefits so that health research and RCTs work for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, services, communities and researchers. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ACTRN12613001068752 (Pre-results); ACTRN12617001652369 (Pre-results).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Penelope Abbott
- School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Deborah Askew
- Primary Care Clinical Unit, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Chelsea Watego
- School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Wendy Cy Hu
- School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Letitia Campbell
- Kalwun Development Corporation, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Claudette Tyson
- Southern Queensland Centre of Excellence in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Primary Health Care, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Robyn Walsh
- School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sylvia Hussey
- Townsville Aboriginal and Islander Health Service, Townsville, Queensland, Australia
| | - Kerrie Doyle
- School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Amanda Jane Leach
- Child Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia
| | - Tim Usherwood
- University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Jennifer Reath
- School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Seear KH, Atkinson DN, Lelievre MP, Henderson-Yates LM, Marley JV. Piloting a culturally appropriate, localised diabetes prevention program for young Aboriginal people in a remote town. Aust J Prim Health 2020; 25:495-500. [PMID: 31581978 DOI: 10.1071/py19024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2019] [Accepted: 08/26/2019] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Lifestyle changes are central to preventing type 2 diabetes. Embarking upon and sustaining change is challenging, and translation of prevention approaches into a wider range of real-world settings is needed. In this study, a locally adapted community-led diabetes prevention program with local young Aboriginal facilitators was created and trialled through the Derby Aboriginal Health Service (DAHS). The 8-week program highlighted causes and consequences of diabetes, incorporated physical activity and healthy eating topics with a focus on practical activities, and included stress management to support healthy lifestyles. Ten Aboriginal women and men aged 18-38 years participated in the pilot program. The program was found to be acceptable and appropriate, and other community members and organisations expressed interest in future participation. Participants reported that they gained important new knowledge and made changes in behaviours including shopping choices, portioning and soft drink consumption. Limitations included participant recruitment and attendance difficulties, which were attributed to program timing and competing demands. While this program was designed to be sustainable, and there were indications of feasibility, resource constraints impeded its integration into routine primary health care. Prevention of diabetes is a high priority for DAHS, and this program, with appropriate resources, provides a basis for ongoing practical prevention strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberley H Seear
- The Rural Clinical School of Western Australia, The University of Western Australia, 12 Napier Terrace (PO Box 1377), Broome, WA 6725, Australia; and Corresponding author.
| | - David N Atkinson
- The Rural Clinical School of Western Australia, The University of Western Australia, 12 Napier Terrace (PO Box 1377), Broome, WA 6725, Australia
| | - Matthew P Lelievre
- Derby Aboriginal Health Service, 1 Stanley Street (PO Box 1155), Derby, WA 6728, Australia; and Present address: North and West Remote Health, 53 Enid Street (PO Box 1127), Mount Isa, Qld 4825, Australia
| | | | - Julia V Marley
- The Rural Clinical School of Western Australia, The University of Western Australia, 12 Napier Terrace (PO Box 1377), Broome, WA 6725, Australia; and Kimberley Aboriginal Medical Services, 12 Napier Terrace (PO Box 1377), Broome, WA 6725, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wong AR, Sun V, George K, Liu J, Padam S, Chen BA, George T, Amini A, Li D, Sedrak MS. Barriers to Participation in Therapeutic Clinical Trials as Perceived by Community Oncologists. JCO Oncol Pract 2020; 16:e849-e858. [PMID: 32240068 DOI: 10.1200/jop.19.00662] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Despite considerable research on the barriers to enrollment in cancer therapeutic trials, few studies have elicited barriers from the perspective of community physicians, who provide the majority of cancer care. The purpose of this study was to characterize barriers to and facilitators of cancer therapeutic trials as perceived by oncologists in community practices. METHODS Twenty semistructured interviews were conducted with oncologists at six community sites affiliated with City of Hope National Medical Center from March to June 2018. Responses were recorded digitally and transcribed. Data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS Of the 20 participants, 4 (20%) were women, 13 (65%) had > 10 years of practice experience, and 16 (80%) reported that < 5% of their patients were enrolled in a therapeutic trial. Participants identified four system-level barriers: lack of appropriate trials for community-based settings, insufficient infrastructure support, restrictive eligibility criteria, and financial limitations; three physician-level barriers: lack of awareness of available trials, lack of knowledge of trial details, and lack of time; and two patient-level barriers: patient burden and negative beliefs/attitudes toward research. Efforts aimed to increase trial availability, clinical trial support personnel, and physician knowledge were identified as major facilitators. CONCLUSION Community oncologists face numerous complex, multifaceted barriers to cancer therapeutic trial enrollment. Although expanding clinical research beyond the academic setting allows access to a larger and more diverse patient population, increasing generalizability and relevance of trial findings, there remains a substantial need for new strategies to improve cancer research delivery in the community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew R Wong
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Duarte, CA
| | - Virginia Sun
- Department of Population Science, City of Hope, Duarte, CA
| | - Kevin George
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Duarte, CA
| | - Jennifer Liu
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Duarte, CA
| | - Simran Padam
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Duarte, CA
| | - Brandon A Chen
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Duarte, CA
| | - Thomas George
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Duarte, CA
| | - Arya Amini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope, Duarte, CA
| | - Daneng Li
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Duarte, CA
| | - Mina S Sedrak
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Duarte, CA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Peiris D, Wright L, News M, Rogers K, Redfern J, Chow C, Thomas D. A Smartphone App to Assist Smoking Cessation Among Aboriginal Australians: Findings From a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2019; 7:e12745. [PMID: 30938691 PMCID: PMC6538311 DOI: 10.2196/12745] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2018] [Revised: 01/30/2019] [Accepted: 01/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Mobile health (mHealth) apps have the potential to increase smoking cessation, but little research has been conducted with Aboriginal communities in Australia. Objective We conducted a pilot study to assess the feasibility and acceptability and explore the effectiveness of a novel mHealth app to assist Aboriginal people to quit smoking. Methods A pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) and process evaluation comprising usage analytics data and in-depth interviews was conducted. Current Aboriginal smokers (>16 years old), who were willing to make a quit attempt in the next month, were recruited from Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Services and a government telephone coaching service. The intervention was a multifaceted Android or iOS app comprising a personalized profile and quit plan, text and in-app motivational messages, and a challenge feature allowing users to compete with others. The comparator was usual cessation support services. Outcome data collection and analysis were conducted blinded to treatment allocation. The primary outcome was self-reported continuous smoking abstinence verified by carbon monoxide breath testing at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included point prevalence of abstinence and use of smoking cessation therapies and services. Results A total of 49 participants were recruited. Competing service delivery priorities, the lack of resources for research, and lack of support for randomization to a control group were the major recruitment barriers. At baseline, 23/49 (47%) of participants had tried to quit in recent weeks. At 6-month follow-up, only 1 participant (intervention arm) was abstinent. The process evaluation highlighted low to moderate app usage (3-10 new users per month and 4-8 returning users per month), an average of 2.9 sessions per user per month and 6.3 min per session. Key themes from interviews with intervention participants (n=15) included the following: (1) the powerful influence of prevailing social norms around acceptability of smoking; (2) high usage of mobile devices for phone, text, and social media but very low use of other smartphone apps; (3) the role of family and social group support in supporting quit attempts; and (4) low awareness and utilization of smoking cessation support services. Despite the broad acceptability of the app, participants also recommended technical improvements to improve functionality, greater customization of text messages, integration with existing social media platforms, and gamification features. Conclusions Smoking cessation apps need to be integrated with commonly used functions of mobile phones and draw on social networks to support their use. Although they have the potential to increase utilization of cessation support services and treatments, more research is needed to identify optimal implementation models. Robust evaluation is critical to determine their impact; however, an RCT design may not be feasible in this setting. Trial Registration Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12616001550493; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=371792 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/76TiV7HA6).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Peiris
- The George Institute for Global Health, UNSW Sydney, Newtown, Australia
| | - Lachlan Wright
- The George Institute for Global Health, UNSW Sydney, Newtown, Australia
| | - Madeline News
- The George Institute for Global Health, UNSW Sydney, Newtown, Australia
| | - Kris Rogers
- The George Institute for Global Health, UNSW Sydney, Newtown, Australia
| | - Julie Redfern
- Westmead Applied Research Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Clara Chow
- Westmead Applied Research Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - David Thomas
- Menzies School of Health Research, Darwin, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bar-Zeev Y, Bonevski B, Bovill M, Gruppetta M, Oldmeadow C, Palazzi K, Atkins L, Reath J, Gould GS. The Indigenous Counselling and Nicotine (ICAN) QUIT in Pregnancy Pilot Study protocol: a feasibility step-wedge cluster randomised trial to improve health providers' management of smoking during pregnancy. BMJ Open 2017; 7:e016095. [PMID: 28780551 PMCID: PMC5629642 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Indigenous women have the highest smoking prevalence during pregnancy (47%) in Australia. Health professionals report lack of knowledge, skills and confidence to effectively manage smoking among pregnant women in general. We developed a behaviour change intervention aimed to improve health professionals' management of smoking in Indigenous pregnant women-the Indigenous Counselling And Nicotine (ICAN) QUIT in Pregnancy. This intervention includes webinar training for health professionals, an educational resources package for health professionals and pregnant women, free oral nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) for pregnant women, and audit and feedback on health professionals' performance.The aim of this study is to test the feasibility and acceptability of the ICAN QUIT in Pregnancy intervention to improve health professionals' provision of evidence-based culturally responsive smoking cessation care to Australian Indigenous pregnant smokers. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This protocol describes the design of a step-wedge cluster randomised pilot study. Six Aboriginal Medical Services (AMSs) are randomised into three clusters. Clusters receive the intervention staggered by 1 month. Health professionals report on their knowledge and skills pretraining and post-training and at the end of the study. Pregnant women are recruited and followed up for 3 months. The primary outcome is the recruitment rate of pregnant women. Secondary outcomes include feasibility of recruitment and follow-up of participating women, and webinar training of health professionals, measured using a designated log; and measures of effectiveness outcomes, including quit rates and NRT prescription rates. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION In accordance with the Aboriginal Health and Medical Research Council guidelines, this study has been developed in collaboration with a Stakeholder and Consumer Aboriginal Advisory Panel (SCAAP). The SCAAP provides cultural consultation, advice and direction to ensure that implementation is acceptable and respectful to the Aboriginal communities involved. Results will be disseminated to AMSs, Aboriginal communities and national Aboriginal bodies. REGISTRATION DETAILS This protocol (version 4, 14 October 2016) is registered with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (Ref #: ACTRN12616001603404).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yael Bar-Zeev
- The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Billie Bonevski
- The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michelle Bovill
- The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Maree Gruppetta
- The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Chris Oldmeadow
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kerrin Palazzi
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Lou Atkins
- Centre for Behaviour Change, University College London, London, UK
| | - Jennifer Reath
- Western Sydney University, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Gillian S Gould
- The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Facilitators and barriers experienced by federal cross-sector partners during the implementation of a healthy eating campaign. Public Health Nutr 2017. [PMID: 28633687 DOI: 10.1017/s1368980017001264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify facilitators and barriers that Health Canada's (HC) cross-sector partners experienced while implementing the Eat Well Campaign: Food Skills (EWC; 2013-2014) and describe how these experiences might differ according to distinct partner types. DESIGN A qualitative study using hour-long semi-structured telephone interviews conducted with HC partners that were transcribed verbatim. Facilitators and barriers were identified inductively and analysed according partner types. SETTING Implementation of a national mass-media health education campaign. SUBJECTS Twenty-one of HC's cross-sector partners (food retailers, media and health organizations) engaged in the EWC. RESULTS Facilitators and barriers were grouped into seven major themes: operational elements, intervention factors, resources, collaborator traits, developer traits, partnership factors and target population factors. Four of these themes had dual roles as both facilitators and barriers (intervention factors, resources, collaborator traits and developer traits). Sub-themes identified as both facilitators and barriers illustrate the extent to which a facilitator can easily become a barrier. Partnership factors were unique facilitators, while operational and target population factors were unique barriers. Time was a barrier that was common to almost all partners regardless of partnership type. There appeared to be a greater degree of uniformity among facilitators, whereas barriers were more diverse and unique to the realities of specific types of partner. CONCLUSIONS Collaborative planning will help public health organizations anticipate barriers unique to the realities of specific types of organizations. It will also prevent facilitators from becoming barriers. Advanced planning will help organizations manage time constraints and integrate activities, facilitating implementation.
Collapse
|
11
|
Bahiru E, de Cates AN, Farr MRB, Jarvis MC, Palla M, Rees K, Ebrahim S, Huffman MD. Fixed-dose combination therapy for the prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 3:CD009868. [PMID: 28263370 PMCID: PMC6464321 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd009868.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is the leading cause of death and disability worldwide, yet ASCVD risk factor control and secondary prevention rates remain low. A fixed-dose combination of blood pressure- and cholesterol-lowering and antiplatelet treatments into a single pill, or polypill, has been proposed as one strategy to reduce the global burden of ASCVD. OBJECTIVES To determine the effect of fixed-dose combination therapy on all-cause mortality, fatal and non-fatal ASCVD events, and adverse events. We also sought to determine the effect of fixed-dose combination therapy on blood pressure, lipids, adherence, discontinuation rates, health-related quality of life, and costs. SEARCH METHODS We updated our previous searches in September 2016 of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, ISI Web of Science, and DARE, HTA, and HEED. We also searched two clinical trials registers in September 2016. We used no language restrictions. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials of a fixed-dose combination therapy including at least one blood pressure-lowering and one lipid-lowering component versus usual care, placebo, or an active drug comparator for any treatment duration in adults 18 years old or older, with no restrictions on presence or absence of pre-existing ASCVD. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Three review authors independently selected studies for inclusion and extracted the data for this update. We evaluated risk of bias using the Cochrane 'Risk of bias' assessment tool. We calculated risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous data and mean differences (MD) for continuous data with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using fixed-effect models when heterogeneity was low (I2 < 50%) and random-effects models when heterogeneity was high (I2 ≥ 50%). We used the GRADE approach to evaluate the quality of evidence. MAIN RESULTS In the initial review, we identified nine randomised controlled trials with a total of 7047 participants and four additional trials (n = 2012 participants; mean age range 62 to 63 years; 30% to 37% women) were included in this update. Eight of the 13 trials evaluated the effects of fixed-dose combination (FDC) therapy in populations without prevalent ASCVD, and the median follow-up ranged from six weeks to 23 months. More recent trials were generally larger with longer follow-up and lower risk of bias. The main risk of bias was related to lack of blinding of participants and personnel, which was inherent to the intervention. Compared with the comparator groups (placebo, usual care, or active drug comparator), the effects of the fixed-dose combination treatment on mortality (FDC = 1.0% versus control = 1.0%, RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.89, I2 = 0%, 5 studies, N = 5300) and fatal and non-fatal ASCVD events (FDC = 4.7% versus control = 3.7%, RR 1.26, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.66, I2 = 0%, 6 studies, N = 4517) were uncertain (low-quality evidence). The low event rates for these outcomes and indirectness of evidence for comparing fixed-dose combination to usual care versus individual drugs suggest that these results should be viewed with caution. Adverse events were common in both the intervention (32%) and comparator (27%) groups, with participants randomised to fixed-dose combination therapy being 16% (RR 1.16, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.25, 11 studies, 6906 participants, moderate-quality evidence) more likely to report an adverse event . The mean differences in systolic blood pressure between the intervention and control arms was -6.34 mmHg (95% CI -9.03 to -3.64, 13 trials, 7638 participants, moderate-quality evidence). The mean differences (95% CI) in total and LDL cholesterol between the intervention and control arms were -0.61 mmol/L (95% CI -0.88 to -0.35, 11 trials, 6565 participants, low-quality evidence) and -0.70 mmol/L (95% CI -0.98 to -0.41, 12 trials, 7153 participants, moderate-quality evidence), respectively. There was a high degree of statistical heterogeneity in comparisons of blood pressure and lipids (I2 ≥ 80% for all) that could not be explained, so these results should be viewed with caution. Fixed-dose combination therapy improved adherence to a multidrug strategy by 44% (26% to 65%) compared with usual care (4 trials, 3835 participants, moderate-quality evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The effects of fixed-dose combination therapy on all-cause mortality or ASCVD events are uncertain. A limited number of trials reported these outcomes, and the included trials were primarily designed to observe changes in ASCVD risk factor levels rather than clinical events, which may partially explain the observed differences in risk factors that were not translated into differences in clinical outcomes among the included trials. Fixed-dose combination therapy is associated with modest increases in adverse events compared with placebo, active comparator, or usual care but may be associated with improved adherence to a multidrug regimen. Ongoing, longer-term trials of fixed-dose combination therapy will help demonstrate whether short-term changes in risk factors might be maintained and lead to expected differences in clinical events based on these changes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ehete Bahiru
- Northwestern UniversityInternal Medicine; Division of Cardiology201 E. Huron St. Galter 19‐100ChicagoIllinoisUSA60611
| | - Angharad N de Cates
- Warwick Medical School, University of WarwickDivision of Health SciencesCoventryUKCV4 7AL
| | - Matthew RB Farr
- Warwick Medical School, University of WarwickDivision of Health SciencesCoventryUKCV4 7AL
| | - Morag C Jarvis
- Warwick Medical School, University of WarwickDivision of Health SciencesCoventryUKCV4 7AL
| | - Mohan Palla
- Wayne State UniversityDepartment of Medicine540 E Canfield StDetroitMichiganUSA48201
| | - Karen Rees
- Warwick Medical School, University of WarwickDivision of Health SciencesCoventryUKCV4 7AL
| | - Shah Ebrahim
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical MedicineDepartment of Non‐communicable Disease EpidemiologyKeppel StreetLondonUKWC1E 7HT
| | - Mark D Huffman
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of MedicineDepartments of Preventive Medicine and Medicine (Cardiology)680 N. Lake Shore Drive, Suite 1400ChicagoILUSA60611
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Peden AE, Franklin RC, Leggat PA. The Hidden Tragedy of Rivers: A Decade of Unintentional Fatal Drowning in Australia. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0160709. [PMID: 27517313 PMCID: PMC4982636 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2016] [Accepted: 07/22/2016] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE(S) Describe unintentional drowning deaths in rivers, creeks and streams (rivers) in Australia and identify risk factors to inform prevention. DESIGN & SETTING This study is a cross-sectional, total population audit of all unintentional fatal drownings in Australian rivers between 1-July-2002 and 30-June-2012 using Australian coronial data. A modified Bonferroni test has been applied, deeming statistical significance p<0.03 and p<0.04 respectively. RESULTS Rivers (n = 770; 26.6%) were the leading location among the 2,892 people who died from unintentional fatal drowning. This is a rate of 0.37/100,000 people / annum. Within river drowning deaths common groups include; males (80.4%), adults (85.3%), adults who have consumed alcohol (25.5%), people who fell in (21.3%), people involved in non-aquatic transport incidents (18.2%) and locals (74.0%). Children were 1.75 times more likely than adults (p<0.04) to drown in rivers as a result of a fall and adults 1.50 times more likely to drown in rivers as a result of watercraft incidents when compared to children. When compared to males, females were 2.27 and 4.45 times respectively more likely to drown in rivers as a result of incidents involving non-aquatic transport (p<0.04) and being swept away by floodwaters (p<0.04). Males were 2.66 and 4.27 times respectively more likely to drown in rivers as a result of watercraft incidents (p<0.04) and as a result of jumping in (p<0.04) when compared to females. CONCLUSION(S) While rivers are the leading location for drowning in Australia, little is understood about the risks. This study has identified key groups (males, adults, locals) and activities. While males were more likely to drown, the risk profile for females differed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy E. Peden
- Royal Life Saving Society–Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia
| | - Richard C. Franklin
- Royal Life Saving Society–Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia
| | - Peter A. Leggat
- School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia
- Research School of Population Health, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| |
Collapse
|