Risk of Hospitalization in Long-Term Care Residents Living with Heart Failure: a Retrospective Cohort Study

A systematic review of reasons and risks for acute service use by older adult residents of long-term care

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To identify the reasons and/or risk factors for hospital admission and/or emergency department attendance for older (≥60 years) residents of long-term care facilities.

BACKGROUND

Older adults' use of acute services is associated with significant financial and social costs. A global understanding of the reasons for the use of acute services may allow for early identification and intervention, avoid clinical deterioration, reduce the demand for health services and improve quality of life.

DESIGN

Systematic review registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022326964) and reported following PRISMA guidelines.

METHODS

The search strategy was developed in consultation with an academic librarian. The strategy used MeSH terms and relevant keywords. Articles published since 2017 in English were eligible for inclusion. CINAHL, MEDLINE, Scopus and Web of Science Core Collection were searched (11/08/22). Title, abstract, and full texts were screened against the inclusion/exclusion criteria; data extraction was performed two blinded reviewers. Quality of evidence was assessed using the NewCastle Ottawa Scale (NOS).

RESULTS

Thirty-nine articles were eligible and included in this review; included research was assessed as high-quality with a low risk of bias. Hospital admission was reported as most likely to occur during the first year of residence in long-term care. Respiratory and cardiovascular diagnoses were frequently associated with acute services use. Frailty, hypotensive medications, falls and inadequate nutrition were associated with unplanned service use.

CONCLUSIONS

Modifiable risks have been identified that may act as a trigger for assessment and be amenable to early intervention. Coordinated intervention may have significant individual, social and economic benefits.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

This review has identified several modifiable reasons for acute service use by older adults. Early and coordinated intervention may reduce the risk of hospital admission and/or emergency department.

REPORTING METHOD

This systematic review was conducted and reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

No patient or public contribution.

Outcomes of advance care directives after admission to a long-term care home: DNR the DNH?

BACKGROUND

Residents of long-term care homes (LTCH) often experience unnecessary and non-beneficial hospitalizations and interventions near the end-of-life. Advance care directives aim to ensure that end-of-life care respects resident needs and wishes.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, we used multistate models to examine the health trajectories associated with Do-Not-Resuscitate (DNR) and Do-Not-Hospitalize (DNH) directives of residents admitted to LTCH in Ontario, Alberta, and British Columbia, Canada. We adjusted for baseline frailty-related health instability. We considered three possible end states: change in health, hospitalization, or death. For measurements, we used standardized RAI-MDS 2.0 LTCH assessments linked to hospital records from 2010 to 2015.

RESULTS

We report on 123,003 LTCH residents. The prevalence of DNR and DNH directives was 71 and 26% respectively. Both directives were associated with increased odds of transitioning to a state of greater health instability and death, and decreased odds of hospitalization. The odds of hospitalization in the presence of a DNH directive were lowered, but not eliminated, with odds of 0.67 (95% confidence interval 0.65-0.69), 0.63 (0.61-0.65), and 0.47 (0.43-0.52) for residents with low, moderate and high health instability, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Even though both DNR and DNH orders are associated with serious health outcomes, DNH directives were not frequently used and often overturned. We suggest that policies recommending DNH directives be re-evaluated, with greater emphasis on advance care planning that better reflects resident values and wishes.

Assessments of heart failure and frailty-related health instability provide complementary and useful information for home care planning and prognosis

BACKGROUND

Health instability, measured with the Changes in Health and End-stage disease Signs and Symptoms (CHESS) scale, predicts hospitalizations and mortality in home care clients. Heart failure (HF) is also common among home care clients. We seek to understand how HF contributes to the odds of death, hospitalization or worsening health among new home care clients depending on admission health instability.

METHODS

We undertook a retrospective cohort study of home care clients aged 65 years and older between January 1st 2010 and March 31st 2015 from Alberta, British Columbia, Ontario, and the Yukon, Canada. We used multistate Markov models to derive adjusted odds ratios (OR) for transitions to different health instability states, hospitalization, and death. We examined the role of HF and CHESS at 6 months after home care admission.

RESULTS

The sample included 286,232 clients. Those with HF had greater odds of worsening health instability than those without HF. At low-moderate admission health instability (CHESS 0-2), clients with HF had greater odds of hospitalization and death than those without HF. Clients with HF and high health instability (CHESS≥3) had slightly greater odds of hospitalization (OR 1.08, 95% Confidence Interval 1.02-1.13) but similar odds of death (OR 1.024, 95% CI 0.937-1.120) compared to clients without HF.

CONCLUSIONS

Among new home care clients, a HF diagnosis predicts death, hospitalization and worsening health, predominantly among those with low-moderate admission health instability. A HF diagnosis and admission CHESS score provide complementary information to support care planning in this population.

Depression and Rehospitalization in Patients With Heart Failure After Discharge From Hospital to Home: An Integrative Review

Patients with heart failure are known to be particularly vulnerable to depression resulting in adverse health outcomes. However, there has been no literature review on current evidence regarding the relationship between depression and rehospitalization. This review aims to explore the relationship between depression and rehospitalization in patients with heart failure. A systematic review employing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines included articles published between 2001 and 2019 taken from Scopus, PubMed, CINAHL, and PsycINFO databases. We identified 12 relevant studies with participants ranging from 115 to 160,169 patients. Heart failure patients with depression were more likely to be rehospitalized than those without. To explain this, few reasons have been proposed. First, depression could disrupt the regulation of autonomic nervous system, neurohormonal activation, and body’s natural rhythm. Second, depressed patients tend to have poor adherence to medication. Healthcare providers should not only focus on drug and dietary management but also on implementing effective interventions to manage depression, in order to reduce the risk of rehospitalization. Moreover, palliative care should start at the stage of heart failure diagnosis to improve quality of life, better outcomes, and lower cost of care for the patients.