Ergonomic Injuries in Endoscopists and Their Risk Factors

Ergonomic wellness for the trainee in gastrointestinal endoscopy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Endoscopy-related injuries (ERIs) are prevalent in gastrointestinal endoscopy. The aim of this review is to address the growing concern of ERIs by evaluating the ergonomic risk factors and the efficacy of interventions and educational strategies aimed at mitigating these risks, including novel approaches.

RECENT FINDINGS

ERIs are highly prevalent, exacerbated by factors such as repetitive strain, nonneutral postures, suboptimal equipment design, and the procedural learning curve. Female sex and smaller hand sizes have been identified as specific risk factors. Recent guidelines underscore the importance of ergonomic education and the integration of ergonomic principles into the foundational training of gastroenterology fellows. Advances in equipment design focus on adaptability to different hand sizes and ergonomic positions. Furthermore, the incorporation of microbreaks and macrobreaks, along with neutral monitor and bed positioning, has shown promise in reducing the incidence of ERIs. Wearable sensors may be helpful in monitoring and promoting ergonomic practices among trainees.

SUMMARY

Ergonomic wellness is paramount for gastroenterology trainees to prevent ERIs and ensure a sustainable career. Effective strategies include ergonomic education integrated into curricula, equipment design improvements, and procedural adaptations such as scheduled breaks and optimal positioning. Sensor-based and camera-based systems may allow for education and feedback to be provided regarding ergonomics to trainees in the future.

Work-Related Musculoskeletal Injury Rates, Risk Factors, and Ergonomics in Different Endoscopic Specialties: A Review

Endoscopy-related musculoskeletal injuries (ERIs) are frequent among gastrointestinal, pulmonary, nasal, and urologic endoscopists, impacting the healthcare system. The present review aims to compare the ERI rates, risk factors, and ergonomic recommendations in the different endoscopic fields. A review was conducted using PubMed and Cochrane Library for articles based on surveys and published until 10 January 2024. Demographic, work, and ERI data from 46 publications were included, covering 10,539 responders. The ERI incidence ranged between 14% and 97%, highlighting the need of intervention independent of the specialties. The neck, back, and shoulder were the most frequent ERI locations, while gender, age, years of experience, and procedure volume the most common risk factors. Ergonomic recommendations suggest concentrating on endoscope design changes, especially in gastrointestinal endoscopy, to increase the comfort, adaptability of the equipment in the operating room, and workflow/institutional policy changes. The inclusion of an ergonomic timeout guarantees the correct equipment positioning, the neutralisation of the endoscopist's posture, and an indirect break between procedures. Ergonomic training to increase awareness and best practice should be promoted, also using new technologies. Future research should concentrate on intervention and comparative studies to evaluate to which extent prevention measures and newly designed equipment could reduce ERI incidence.

Enhancing Ergonomics in Pediatric Endoscopy Training and Practice

Pediatric endoscopists are at risk of work-related injuries from overuse and repetitive motions during endoscopy. Recently, there has been increasing appreciation for the importance of ergonomics education and training to help build long-term habits that prevent injury. This article reviews the epidemiology of endoscopy-related injuries in pediatric practice, describes methods for controlling exposures in the workplace, discusses key ergonomic principles that can be used to mitigate injury risk, and outlines tips for integrating education on endoscopy ergonomics during training.

Musculoskeletal injury and ergonomics in pediatric gastrointestinal endoscopic practice

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Endoscopy-related musculoskeletal injuries (ERI) are increasingly prevalent in adult endoscopists; however, there are no studies that have evaluated ERI and ergonomic practices among pediatric gastroenterologists and trainees. We aimed to examine the prevalence, nature, and impact of musculoskeletal injuries in pediatric endoscopic practice and assess attitudes towards ergonomic training needs.

METHODS

Pediatric gastroenterologists and trainees were surveyed to collect information on endoscopist and practice characteristics, the prevalence, nature, and impacts of ERI, ergonomics strategies employed in practice, previous ergonomics training, and perceptions of ergonomics training (elicited using a 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree) Likert scale). Responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and bivariate analyses were conducted to explore correlates of ERI.

RESULTS

Among 146 survey respondents, 50 (34.2%) were trainees and 96 (65.8%) were practicing endoscopists with a mean duration of endoscopic practice of 9.7 ± 9.4 years. Overall, 55.6% (n = 80/144) reported experiencing a musculoskeletal injury, with 34.7% (n = 50/144) reporting an injury attributable to endoscopy. Among those with ERI, the most common sites were the neck/upper back (44.0%), thumb (42.0%), hand/finger (38.0%), and lower back (36.0%). Women were more likely to experience ERI compared to men (43.4% vs. 23.4%; p = 0.013). Only 20.9% of participants had formal training in ergonomics. Respondents reported being motivated to implement practice changes to prevent ERI (4.41 ± 0.95) and perceived ergonomics training as important (4.37 ± 0.96).

CONCLUSIONS

Pediatric endoscopists, and particularly women, experience significant ERI; however, formal endoscopy ergonomics training is rare. Improved ergonomics training is needed for both practicing pediatric gastroenterologists and trainees.

Gesundheitszustand des Endoskopiepersonals in Österreich

Hintergrund Die Arbeit in der Endoskopie ist mit physischen und psychischen Herausforderungen verbunden, es gibt jedoch kaum Daten, ob dadurch die Gesundheit der Betroffenen beeinflusst wird. Ziel der Erhebung war, den Gesundheitszustand von Österreichs Endoskopie-Personal zu evaluieren und Vergleiche anzustellen.

Methode 2019 wurde an Ärzt*innen (n=236) und Pflegepersonen (n=324) in österreichischen gastrointestinalen Endoskopien ein standardisierter Fragebogen des Hogrefe Verlags und ein selbst entworfener SurveyMonkey Fragebogen online versendet. Die Rücklaufquote betrug 17,9%. Die Daten wurden mit einer Normbevölkerung, mit einer ähnlichen älteren Erhebung aus 2004 und nationalen Krankenstandsdaten verglichen.

Ergebnisse Im Vergleich mit einer Normbevölkerung gleichen Alters und Geschlechtsverteilung hat österreichisches Endoskopiepersonal mehr gesundheitliche Beschwerden. Im Vergleich mit den Ärzt*innen geben Pflegepersonen mehr Beeinträchtigungen an, am deutlichsten Müdigkeit und übermäßiges Schlafbedürfnis (p=0,001), Schweregefühl in den Beinen (p=0,001) sowie Wärme- (p<0,001) und Kälte-Überempfindlichkeit (p=0,002). Pflegepersonen sind etwas häufiger im Krankenstand als Ärzt*innen, die Krankenstandstage haben sich gegenüber 2004 vermehrt, liegen aber deutlich niedriger als im österreichischen Durchschnitt. Lebensstil übt wenig Einfluss auf die Symptome aus.

Schlussfolgerung Die Umfrageergebnisse zeigen, dass Arbeiten in der Endoskopie im Vergleich mit der Normbevölkerung mit gering stärkeren gesundheitlichen Problemen einhergeht. Pflegepersonen sind stärker belastet als Ärzt*innen. Diese Daten können Grundlage für gezielte Maßnahmen zur Prävention darstellen.