1
|
Hinojosa-Gonzalez DE, Salgado-Garza G, Torres-Martinez M, Villegas-De Leon SU, Bueno-Gutierrez LC, Herrera-Carrillo FE, Gonzalez-Urquijo M, Segura Ibarra V, Fabiani MA, Flores-Villalba E. Endovascular Treatment of Transplant Renal Artery Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Endovasc Ther 2021; 29:294-306. [PMID: 34399594 DOI: 10.1177/15266028211038593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Endovascular treatment through either percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) alone or stenting has been previously used as a treatment for transplant renal artery stenosis (TRAS). This review aimed to investigate the results of endovascular treatment for renal artery stenosis in transplanted kidneys as compared with the outcomes of interventions, medical management, and graft survival in non-TRAS patients. METHODS A systematic review of PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane, and Scopus was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines in which studies that reported outcomes of the treatment of TRAS via the endoluminal approach were identified, and their results were meta-analyzed. RESULTS Fifty-four studies with a total of 1522 patients were included. A significant reduction of serum creatinine level was found, favoring the stenting group, with a mean difference of 0.68 mg/dL (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.17-1.19; Z=2.60, p=0.0009). Comparison of pre- and post-intervention values of any intervention revealed a significant decrease in overall serum creatinine level (0.65 mg/dL; 95% CI, 0.40-0.90; Z=5.09, p=0.00001), overall blood pressure, with a mean difference of 11.12 mmHg (95% CI, 7.29-14.95; Z=5.59, p=0.00001), mean difference in the use of medications (0.77; 95% CI, 0.29-1.24; p=0.002), and peak systolic velocity (190.05; 95% CI, 128.41-251.69; p<0.00001). The comparison of serum creatinine level between endovascular interventions and best medical therapy favored endovascular intervention, with a mean difference of 0.23 mg/dL (95% CI, 0.14-0.32; Z=5.07, p<0.00001). Graft survival was similar between the treated patients and those without TRAS (hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.75-1.28; p=0.091). The overall pooled success rate was 89%, and the overall complication rate was 10.4%, with the most prevalent complication being arterial dissection. CONCLUSION The endovascular treatment of TRAS improves graft preservation and renal function and hemodynamic parameters. PTA + stenting appears to be a more effective option to PTA alone in the stabilization of renal function, with additional benefits from decreased restenosis rates. Further high-quality studies could expand on these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Gustavo Salgado-Garza
- Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, NL, Mexico
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Victor Segura Ibarra
- Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, NL, Mexico.,Escuela de Ingeniería y Ciencias, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, NL, Mexico
| | | | - Eduardo Flores-Villalba
- Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, NL, Mexico.,Escuela de Ingeniería y Ciencias, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, NL, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dong X, Wang Y, Liang H, Zheng C, Zhao H, Hu HY, Long X, Su Y. Spontaneous recanalization of occluded transplant renal artery: a rare case report. BMC Nephrol 2020; 21:439. [PMID: 33076853 PMCID: PMC7574526 DOI: 10.1186/s12882-020-02105-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2020] [Accepted: 10/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Transplant renal artery stenosis (TRAS) is a serious vascular complication that occurs after renal transplantation and can result in hypertension, renal functional impairment, and graft loss. Endovascular treatment has become the first-line treatment for TRAS because of its low invasiveness and high success rate. Case presentation A 23-year-old female with end-stage renal disease of unknown cause received a living-donor kidney transplantation 10 months ago. Seven months after the transplantation, her blood pressure gradually deteriorated. Magnetic resonance angiography revealed bending and stenosis of the transplant renal artery, and the patient received endovascular treatment. A digital subtraction angiography revealed significant stenosis of 95% in the proximal transplant renal artery. The guidewire could not pass through the stenotic segment of the transplant renal artery even with repeated attempts by the surgeons; as a result, the transplant renal artery became occluded, and vasodilators were ineffective. After the operation, renal function gradually worsened, so she began to receive regular dialysis. Twenty-five days later, the patient’s urine volume was significantly higher than that before, and ultrasound showed that the proximal transplant renal artery was not completely occluded. A re-intervention was performed, and the stent was placed successfully in the stenotic segment. After the operation, renal function gradually recovered, and dialysis was no longer needed. Conclusion Patients with iatrogenic transplant renal artery occlusion may have the possibility of spontaneous recanalization, which can help prevent the need for re-transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiangjun Dong
- Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China.,Hubei Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan, 430022, China
| | - Yingliang Wang
- Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China.,Hubei Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan, 430022, China
| | - Huimin Liang
- Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China.,Hubei Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan, 430022, China
| | - Chuansheng Zheng
- Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China.,Hubei Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan, 430022, China
| | - Hui Zhao
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430060, China
| | - Hong Yao Hu
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430060, China
| | - Xi Long
- Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China.,Hubei Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan, 430022, China
| | - Yangbo Su
- Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China. .,Hubei Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan, 430022, China.
| |
Collapse
|