1
|
Lu Y, Zhao D, Cao G, Yin S, Liu C, Song R, Ma J, Sun R, Wu Z, Liu J, Wu P, Wang Y. Research progress on and molecular mechanism of vacuum sealing drainage in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. Front Surg 2024; 11:1265360. [PMID: 38464666 PMCID: PMC10920358 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1265360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2023] [Accepted: 01/05/2024] [Indexed: 03/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are common chronic wounds and a common complication of diabetes. The foot is the main site of diabetic ulcers, which involve small and medium-sized arteries, peripheral nerves, and microcirculation, among others. DFUs are prone to coinfections and affect many diabetic patients. In recent years, interdisciplinary research combining medicine and material science has been increasing and has achieved significant clinical therapeutic effects, and the application of vacuum sealing drainage (VSD) in the treatment of DFUs is a typical representative of this progress, but the mechanism of action remains unclear. In this review, we integrated bioinformatics and literature and found that ferroptosis is an important signaling pathway through which VSD promotes the healing of DFUs and that System Xc-GSH-GPX4 and NAD(P)H-CoQ10-FSP1 are important axes in this signaling pathway, and we speculate that VSD is most likely to inhibit ferroptosis to promote DFU healing through the above axes. In addition, we found that some classical pathways, such as the TNF, NF-κB, and Wnt/β-catenin pathways, are also involved in the VSD-mediated promotion of DFU healing. We also compiled and reviewed the progress from clinical studies on VSD, and this information provides a reference for the study of VSD in the treatment of DFUs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yongpan Lu
- First Clinical Medical College, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China
- Jinan Clinical Research Center for Tissue Engineering Skin Regeneration and Wound Repair, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Jinan, China
| | - Dejie Zhao
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China
| | - Guoqi Cao
- Jinan Clinical Research Center for Tissue Engineering Skin Regeneration and Wound Repair, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Jinan, China
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Siyuan Yin
- Jinan Clinical Research Center for Tissue Engineering Skin Regeneration and Wound Repair, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Jinan, China
- Department of Plastic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Jinan, China
| | - Chunyan Liu
- Jinan Clinical Research Center for Tissue Engineering Skin Regeneration and Wound Repair, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Jinan, China
- Department of Plastic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Jinan, China
| | - Ru Song
- Jinan Clinical Research Center for Tissue Engineering Skin Regeneration and Wound Repair, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Jinan, China
- Department of Plastic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Jinan, China
| | - Jiaxu Ma
- Jinan Clinical Research Center for Tissue Engineering Skin Regeneration and Wound Repair, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Jinan, China
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Rui Sun
- Jinan Clinical Research Center for Tissue Engineering Skin Regeneration and Wound Repair, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Jinan, China
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Zhenjie Wu
- Jinan Clinical Research Center for Tissue Engineering Skin Regeneration and Wound Repair, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Jinan, China
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Jian Liu
- Jinan Clinical Research Center for Tissue Engineering Skin Regeneration and Wound Repair, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Jinan, China
- Department of Plastic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Jinan, China
| | - Peng Wu
- Jinan Clinical Research Center for Tissue Engineering Skin Regeneration and Wound Repair, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Jinan, China
- Department of Plastic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Jinan, China
| | - Yibing Wang
- Jinan Clinical Research Center for Tissue Engineering Skin Regeneration and Wound Repair, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Jinan, China
- Department of Plastic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Jinan, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wang H, Hu X, Zhou H, Chen X, Wang M. The safety and effectiveness of a self-made negative pressure suction device in the treatment of chronic wounds. Skin Res Technol 2023; 29:e13415. [PMID: 38062667 PMCID: PMC10704041 DOI: 10.1111/srt.13415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Chronic wounds are wounds that are not healed or have no healing tendency for more than 1 month due to various factors. In clinical nursing, chronic wounds are often not properly treated, and the treatment efficiency is low. Therefore, it is very important to explore effective methods to deal with chronic wounds. OBJECTIVE To explore the effect of a self-made negative pressure suction device (NPSD) in the nursing of chronic wounds in the elderly. METHODS A total of 50 elderly patients with chronic wounds who were hospitalised in our hospital from January 2020 to December 2022 were selected as participants by convenient sampling. According to the random number table method, they were divided into a control group and an observation group, with 25 people in each group. The control group was treated with chloroplast foam dressing, debridement gel and alginate dressing. The observation group was treated with a self-made NPSD on the basis of the control group. The wound healing of the two groups was observed. RESULTS After the intervention of the self-made NPSD, the granulation tissue coverage rate and wound volume reduction rate of the observation group were significantly increased (p < 0.05), and the positive rate of bacterial infection was significantly decreased (p < 0.05). After 3 months of intervention, the total effective rate of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group (χ2 = 3.869, p = 0.0492). CONCLUSION The self-made NPSD can effectively promote the healing of a chronic wound.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- He‐Ping Wang
- Department of NursingThe Second Affiliated Hospital Of Wannan Medical CollegeWuhuChina
| | - Xiu‐Li Hu
- Department of Wound Stomy ClinicThe Second Affiliated Hospital Of Wannan Medical CollegeWuhuChina
| | - Hua‐Qin Zhou
- Department of NursingThe Second Affiliated Hospital Of Wannan Medical CollegeWuhuChina
| | - Xi‐Shan Chen
- Department of NursingThe Second Affiliated Hospital Of Wannan Medical CollegeWuhuChina
| | - Meng‐Xin Wang
- Department of NursingThe Second Affiliated Hospital Of Wannan Medical CollegeWuhuChina
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chen Q, Lu M, Liu X, Yu Y, Li J. Comparison of customized vacuum sealing drainage and vacuum sealing drainage in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: a retrospective analysis. J Orthop Surg Res 2023; 18:803. [PMID: 37891685 PMCID: PMC10605333 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-023-04298-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Accepted: 10/17/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prevalence of diabetic foot ulcers, a common, more serious chronic diabetes-related complication, is increasing. Vacuum sealing drainage (VSD) constitutes an effective adjunctive treatment for diabetic foot ulcers. Factors, such as poor glycemic control, ischemia, and infection prolong wound healing time, and VSD products are expensive and unaffordable for many patients. OBJECTIVE To compare the use of customized VSD and customized VSD in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcer. METHOD This retrospective study included 83 patients with diabetic foot ulcers in customized VSD (n = 44) and VSD (n = 39) groups. Baseline data, efficacy after 14 days, total treatment efficiency, final outcome (28 days after treatment, healing rate), average treatment cost, and hospitalization (days) of the two groups were compared. Factors affecting wound healing were analyzed. RESULTS No significant intergroup differences in the baseline data were detected (VSD vs. customized VAD, p > 0.05). Treatment efficacy was higher in the customized VSD group than in the VSD group after 14 days (p < 0.05), although total treatment efficiency in both groups reached 100%. The final outcome in the customized VSD group was better (vs. VSD group, p < 0.05), and the wound healing rate was higher than in the VSD group (66.7% vs. 33.3%). The mean treatment cost and hospital days were greater in the VSD group (vs. customized VSD group; p < 0.05). Factors affecting wound healing include age, Wagner classification, HDL-C, and fasting C-peptide. Younger age, low Wagner classification grade, low HDL-C level, and high fasting C-peptide contribute to higher healing rate, CONCLUSION: Efficacy and final outcome of customized VSD were better than that of VSD; the customized VSD device is simple and convenient to operate, and enables cost-effective treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qingling Chen
- Department of Endocrinology, First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510632, China
| | - Minting Lu
- School of Nursing, Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510632, China
| | - Xueyan Liu
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510632, China
| | - Yanmei Yu
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510632, China
| | - Jiaying Li
- Department of Endocrinology, First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510632, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
董 书, 黄 东, 祝 李, 刘 小. [Treatment of diabetic foot with vaccum sealing drainage combined with transverse tibial bone transport]. ZHONGGUO XIU FU CHONG JIAN WAI KE ZA ZHI = ZHONGGUO XIUFU CHONGJIAN WAIKE ZAZHI = CHINESE JOURNAL OF REPARATIVE AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY 2020; 34:869-873. [PMID: 32666730 PMCID: PMC8180418 DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.201911150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2019] [Revised: 04/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To summarize the effectiveness and experience of Wanger grade 3-5 diabetic foot treated with vacuum sealing drainage (VSD) combined with transverse tibial bone transport. METHODS Between March 2015 and January 2018, 21 patients with refractory diabetic foot who failed conservative treatment were treated with VSD combined with transverse tibial bone transport. There were 15 males and 6 females, aged 55-88 years (mean, 65 years). The diabetes history was 8-15 years (mean, 12.2 years). The duration of diabetic foot ranged from 7 to 84 days (mean, 35.3 days). The size of diabetic foot ulcer before operation ranged from 2 cm×2 cm to 8 cm×5 cm. According to Wanger classification, 8 cases were rated as grade 3, 11 cases as grade 4, and 2 cases as grade 5. Among the 21 cases, angiography of lower extremity before operation was performed in 5 cases, CT angiography of lower extremity in 16 cases, all of which indicated that the arteries below the knee were narrowed to varying degrees and not completely blocked. Preoperative foot skin temperature was (29.28±0.77)℃, C-reactive protein was (38.03±31.23) mg/L, leukocyte count was (9.44±2.21)×10 9/L, and the visual analogue scale (VAS) score was 6.8±1.5, and ability of daily living (Barthel index) was 54.3±10.3. RESULTS After operation, 2 patients with Wanger grade 4 and smoking history failed treatment and had an major amputation (amputation above ankle joint) at 30 days and 45 days after operation, respectively. One patient with Wanger grade 5 and chronic heart failure died of cardiac arrest at 60 days after operation. The remaining 18 patients were followed up 6-24 months (mean, 9.2 months). The external fixator was removed at 40-62 days after operation, with an average of 46 days. All the wounds healed, with a healing time of 50-120 days (mean, 62.5 days). The pain of 18 patients' feet was relieved obviously, and there was no recurrence of ulcer in situ or other parts. There was no complication such as tibial fracture and ischemic necrosis of lower leg skin after operation. After ulcer healing, the foot skin temperature was (30.86±0.80)℃, C-reactive protein was (22.90±18.42) mg/L, VAS score was 2.4±1.2, and Barthel index was 77.3±4.6, all showing significant differences when compared with preoperative ones ( P<0.05); the leukocyte count was (8.91±1.72)×10 9/L, showing no significant difference ( t=1.090, P=0.291). CONCLUSION VSD combined with transverse tibial bone transport can effectively promote the healing of Wanger grade 3-5 diabetic foot wounds, but smokers, unstable blood glucose control, and chronic heart failure patients have the risk of failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- 书男 董
- 广东省第二人民医院创伤骨科(广州 510317)Department of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Second People’s Hospital of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou Guangdong, 510317, P.R.China
- 广东医科大学研究生院(广东湛江 524000)Graduate School of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang Guangdong, 524000, P.R.China
| | - 东 黄
- 广东省第二人民医院创伤骨科(广州 510317)Department of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Second People’s Hospital of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou Guangdong, 510317, P.R.China
| | - 李霖 祝
- 广东省第二人民医院创伤骨科(广州 510317)Department of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Second People’s Hospital of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou Guangdong, 510317, P.R.China
| | - 小燕 刘
- 广东省第二人民医院创伤骨科(广州 510317)Department of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Second People’s Hospital of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou Guangdong, 510317, P.R.China
| |
Collapse
|