Pediatric Residency Point-of-Care Ultrasound Training Needs Assessment and Educational Intervention

Pediatric ultrasound practice in Italy: an exploratory survey

BACKGROUND

The aim of this exploratory survey is to describe the current state of US (ultrasound) technique across different pediatric settings nationwide.

METHODS

A questionnaire was emailed to all members of the Italian Society of Pediatrics, including pediatric residents. The survey was open from December 2021 to March 2022.

RESULTS

There were 1098 respondents. Seven hundred and seven pediatricians (84.1%) reported any use of US, while 51 (44.3%) residents denied it. The majority of participants (n = 956, 87.1%) reported to have a US machine available within the department, mostly cart-based (n = 516, 66.9%) and provided from 1 to 5 years prior to the survey (n = 330, 42.8%). Lung and neonatal cerebral regions were the most frequently scanned (n = 289, 18.7% and n = 218, 14.1%, respectively). The suspicion of pneumonia or respiratory distress represented the main reasons for performing US in emergency room (n = 390, 78% and n = 330, 66%, respectively). The majority of family pediatricians reported to scan lung and kidney/urinary tract regions (n = 30, 16.9%, and n = 23,12.9%, respectively). Regarding US training, the majority of respondents (n = 358, 34.6%) declared an experience-based education, with a deficient certification enabling the use of US in 71.6% (n = 552) of cases. The most common barriers included the lack of a well-defined training program (n = 627, 57.1%), unavailability of the US machine (n = 196, 17.9%) and legal responsibility concern (n = 175, 15.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the growing interest on pediatric US nationally, significant barriers still limit widespread adoption. These obstacles may be addressed through the dissemination of a specific US education plan and providing additional resources.

Point-of-care ultrasound as a diagnostic tool in respiratory assessment in awake paediatric patients: a comparative study

BACKGROUND

Chest X-ray (CXR) has typically been the main investigation in children with suspected respiratory pathology. Recent advances in lung point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) have shown the potential for it to be comparative, if not better, than CXR. The objective of this study was to compare CXR with lung POCUS in children with respiratory illness in a ward-based setting at a paediatric teaching hospital.

METHODS

Any child <18 years of age presenting to Southampton Children's Hospital requiring a CXR for clinical reasons also had lung POCUS performed. CXR was reported by a consultant paediatric radiologist and lung POCUS was reviewed retrospectively by a blinded POCUS clinician, with only the clinical information provided on the CXR request. Comparisons were made between the CXR and lung POCUS findings.

RESULTS

100 paired lung POCUS and CXR were included in the study. 30% of lung POCUS were normal with 97% of these having a normal CXR. 70% of cases had POCUS abnormalities with 96% of POCUS cases identifying comparative lung pathology. Lung POCUS therefore had a sensitivity of 98.51% and a specificity of 87.9% with a diagnostic accuracy of 95% when compared with the CXR report.

CONCLUSIONS

Lung POCUS has excellent diagnostic accuracy. The diagnosis of normal lung on POCUS when performed by a trained practitioner can reliably reduce the need for a CXR, thus reducing CXR use and radiation exposure in children. An abnormal lung POCUS could then either give the diagnosis or lead to a CXR with the expectation of clinically relevant findings.

An in-Depth Examination of the Characteristics of Pre-Hospital Point-of-Care Ultrasound Training Among Emergency Medicine Residents in Laos as Part of an Overseas Elective Rotation

Introduction

Point of Care Ultrasound (POCUS) training has been offering invaluable guidance in the diagnostic process and treatment strategies, particularly in resource-limited settings. The purpose of this study was to determine participant satisfaction with the structure and scope of POCUS training in overseas elective rotation.

Material and Methods

A retrospective observational analytical study was undertaken. The study focused on EM residents from Laos who participated in the international elective rotation at the Khon Kaen University during the academic years 2020-2021 and 2022-2023. The research involved an exploration of training data related to this course, encompassing participant characteristics, the structure and scope of POCUS training, the training assessments, and post completion surveys of participants.

Results

The study involved 24 participants. The course was characterized by its status as an international elective program prehospital POCUS training for post graduate year 3 students. The duration of the rotation ranged from 2 to 4 weeks. Interestingly, in the academic year 2022-2023, the duration of POCUS training was notably extended to 8 hours, accounting for 4.76% of the total time. The training encompassed peer-to-peer didactic lectures, bedside teaching, and observational case studies at the Emergency Department (ED). The results of our survey, boasting a 100% response rate, indicated participants' contentment with the academic performance, the abundance of learning resources, and the knowledge gained from this rotation that would aid their future careers. The overall satisfaction with this course was highly rated, falling into the "satisfy" and "highly satisfy" categories. However, certain challenges were reported, including feelings of isolation due to the distance from relatives, concerns related to interpersonal relationships with colleagues, and a sense of being isolated.

Conclusion

The participants were highly satisfied to the structure and scope of this course. The overseas elective rotation significantly enhanced the knowledge of Laos EM residents' in POCUS and underscored the crucial importance of this course in EM training.

[Interpretation of the clinical guideline for point-of-care ultrasonography in the neonatal intensive care unit in the United States]

In December 2022, the American Academy of Pediatrics released a clinical guideline for point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). The guideline outlined the development and current status of POCUS in the NICU, and summarized the key elements and implementation guidelines for successful implementation of POCUS in the NICU. This article provides an overview of the key points of the clinical guideline and analyzes the current status of POCUS in China, providing a reference for the implementation of POCUS in neonatal care in China.

Pediatric Residents' Perceptions of a Point-of-Care Ultrasound Collaboration With Emergency Medicine

Background Pediatric residencies expanding their point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) education face barriers, including a lack of established curriculum and qualified educators. Prior studies report partnerships between pediatrics and pediatric emergency medicine (PEM); however, many non-PEM emergency medicine (EM) physicians with POCUS fellowship training also have experience with pediatric POCUS and represent an alternate educational partner. Objectives To improve pediatric residents' POCUS skills through collaborative education with EM and evaluate perceptions of the teaching format and instructors. Methods First through third-year pediatric residents attended a half-day didactic and hands-on session about renal, lung, and musculoskeletal (MSK) POCUS. These educational sessions were led by EM faculty with POCUS fellowship training and assisted by EM residents. Post-session surveys were administered to pediatric residents to assess prior POCUS experience, changes in confidence in acquiring and interpreting renal, lung, and MSK POCUS images, and opinions about the educational format. Statistical analyses of the post-session survey data were performed using SPSS. Results Thirty-nine pediatric residents attended the session and completed the survey of 45 total residents in the program (86.7%), with 89.7% completing 10 or fewer POCUS studies. Residents' comfort level with performing lung POCUS increased from 5.1% to 82.1% (p < .001), renal POCUS from 10.3% to 76.9% (p < .001), and MSK POCUS from 7.7% to 84.6% (p < .001). 87.2% rated the educational format as effective, and 94.9% (37/39) rated emergency medicine faculty as 'very effective' in providing ultrasound education relevant to the practice of pediatrics. Conclusion Pediatric resident POCUS education taught by EM faculty with POCUS fellowship training was well-received by pediatric residents and significantly improved confidence in acquiring and interpreting POCUS.

A Longitudinal Evaluation of a Multimodal POCUS Curriculum in Pediatric Residents

Introduction: Pediatric residency programs often do not include a point of care ultrasound (POCUS) curriculum. We analyzed a novel POCUS curriculum for pediatric residents that incorporated an online question bank (QB), in addition to a traditional teaching model of didactic instruction and hands-on learning experience. Methods: Four high-yield POCUS topics were chosen: Focused Assessment by Sonography for Trauma (FAST), soft tissue, lung, and cardiac. Residents completed online multiple-choice quizzes before and after each of four in-person learning sessions, taught by ultrasound faculty and fellows. At the end of the academic year participants completed a knowledge retention quiz. Confidence surveys were administered to participants throughout the course of the study. Differences in means were compared by Student's t-test. Results: Learners demonstrated post-intervention score improvement for each of the four modules. Retention testing demonstrated retained improvement for the soft tissue and cardiac modules, but not for the FAST module. Self-reported confidence increased across all four topics. Conclusion: A multimodal POCUS curriculum utilizing a combination of an online QB and in-person teaching demonstrated lasting knowledge for pediatric trainees.