The Benefits Outweigh the Risks of Treating Hypercholesterolemia: The Statin Dilemma

Safety profile of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors alirocumab and evolocumab: an updated meta-analysis and meta-regression

BACKGROUND

The use of alirocumab and evolocumab is generally safe and well-tolerated. However, concerns remain about their long-term safety, especially with regard to new-onset or worsening diabetes mellitus (DM). We aim to assess the safety profile of alirocumab and evolocumab compared to comparator.

METHODS

Studies were retrieved comparing the safety of PCSK9i vs. comparator (placebo or statin with or without ezetimibe). The primary outcome was adverse events leading to death. Secondary outcomes included serious adverse events, new onset diabetes mellitus (DM), worsening of DM, neurocognitive dysfunction, creatine kinase (CK) elevation, elevation of liver enzymes and local injection site reaction. Factors associated with the treatment effect were determined by meta-regression analysis. Subgroup analyses were done to explore potential treatment effect differences based on PCSK9i type and treatment duration.

RESULTS

We identified 56 studies with 85,123 adults (29.14% females). PCSK9i was not associated with adverse events that lead to death (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.04, p = 0.22). Between the two PCSK9i, alirocumab decreased adverse events leading to death (OR 0.79, 95% CI, 0.67 to 0.94, p = 0.008). PCSK9i was associated with less serious events compared to the comparator (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.89 to 0.98, p < 0.001). This reduction was driven mainly by alirocumab (OR 0.89, 95% CI, 0.85 to 0.93, p < 0.001). Evolocumab worsened DM (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.26 to 4.2, p = 0.041). Subgroup analysis showed worsening of DM in the first 24 weeks of treatment with odds being highest in the first 12 weeks of treatment (<12 weeks: OR 3.82, 95% CI 1.13 to 12.99, p = 0.03; 12-24 weeks OR 2.12, 95% CI 1.20 to 3.73, p = 0.01. On the other hand, therapy >24 weeks reduced the odds of worsening DM (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.99, p = 0.04). PCSK9i did not increase cognitive dysfunction, (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.18, p = 0.76), or cause elevations in liver enzyme (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.03, p = 0.14), or CK (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.04, p = 0.10). However, PCSK9i was associated with local injection site reaction (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.37 to 1.73, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Alirocumab decreased adverse events leading to death. Alirocumab and Evolocumab both decreased serious adverse events. PCSK9i did not increase new onset DM however evolocumab worsened DM in the first 24 weeks of treatment. PCSK9i did not increase neurologic dysfunction, and did not elevate liver enzymes and CK, however it was associated with local injection site reaction.

Atorvastatin on Treatment of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Patients

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a condition in which excess fat builds up in the liver, often related to obesity and insulin resistance, which can lead to inflammation and scarring of the liver tissue. While efforts have been made to develop effective treatments for NAFLD, the need for pharmaceutical interventions remains unmet. Large clinical trials investigating the association between statin use and NAFLD are scarce, leading to contradictory results. Statins play a crucial role in cholesterol synthesis in the liver. Several studies have demonstrated that statins possess anti-inflammatory, anti-thrombotic, and anti-fibrotic properties. These properties make statins potentially useful in preventing the progression of NAFLD from simple steatosis to more severe forms like non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and fibrosis. The results indicate that statin use is associated with a lower prevalence of NASH and fibrosis and may have a preventive effect on NAFLD.

A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Relationship between Statin Intake and Esophageal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Esophageal cancer is a malignant tumor with a low survival rate. Statins, commonly prescribed for their lipid-lowering effects, have been suggested to possess potential chemopreventive properties against various cancers, including esophageal cancer.

OBJECTIVES

This systematic review studied the association between statin intake and esophageal cancer.

METHODS

To conduct this systematic review and meta-analysis, we reviewed studies published between 1980 and June 2023 in Web of Science (WOS), Embase, MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases according to the PRISMA guidelines. Data extraction, quality assessment, and statistical analyses were performed using predefined protocols. We used various statistical tests conducted by Stata statistical software. Statistical significance was considered significant at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Twenty-one studies were collected and analyzed. The meta-analysis demonstrated that the odds ratio (OR) of esophageal cancer in patients treated with statins was 0.65 (95% CI: 0.57-0.75, p < 0.001) compared to the non-receiving group. The ORs for case-control and cohort studies were 0.67 (95% CI:0.54-0.83, p < 0.001) and 0.62 (95% CI:0.55-0.71, p < 0.001), respectively. The investigation into the relationship between the statins intake and the incidence of esophageal cancer did not reveal any indication of publication bias according to both Begg's test (p = 0.966) and Egger's test (p = 0.113).

CONCLUSION

The results revealed that the odds of esophageal cancer in patients treated with statins decreased by 35% compared to patients not treated with statins. However, further well-designed prospective studies are needed to validate these findings and understand the underlying mechanisms of statins in preventing esophageal cancer.

An Update on Drug-Nutrient Interactions and Dental Decay in Older Adults

In recent decades, the global demographic landscape has undergone a discernible shift that has been characterised by a progressive increase in the proportion of elderly individuals, indicative of an enduring global inclination toward extended lifespans. The aging process, accompanied by physiological changes and dietary patterns, contributes to detrimental deviations in micronutrient consumption. This vulnerable aging population faces heightened risks, including dental caries, due to structural and functional modifications resulting from insufficient nutritional sustenance. Factors such as physiological changes, inadequate nutrition, and the prevalence of multiple chronic pathologies leading to polypharmacy contribute to the challenge of maintaining an optimal nutritional status. This scenario increases the likelihood of drug interactions, both between medications and with nutrients and the microbiome, triggering complications such as dental decay and other pathologies. Since the drug industry is evolving and new types of food, supplements, and nutrients are being designed, there is a need for further research on the mechanisms by which drugs interfere with certain nutrients that affect homeostasis, exemplified by the prevalence of caries in the mouths of older adults. Infectious diseases, among them dental caries, exert serious impacts on the health and overall quality of life of the elderly demographic. This comprehensive review endeavours to elucidate the intricate interplay among drugs, nutrients, the microbiome, and the oral cavity environment, with the overarching objective of mitigating the potential hazards posed to both the general health and dental well-being of older adults. By scrutinising and optimising these multifaceted interactions, this examination aims to proactively minimise the susceptibility of the elderly population to a spectrum of health-related issues and the consequences associated with dental decay.