Prostate cancer and elective nodal radiation therapy for cN0 and pN0-a never ending story? : Recommendations from the prostate cancer expert panel of the German Society of Radiation Oncology (DEGRO)

For prostate cancer, the role of elective nodal irradiation (ENI) for cN0 or pN0 patients has been under discussion for years. Considering the recent publications of randomized controlled trials, the prostate cancer expert panel of the German Society of Radiation Oncology (DEGRO) aimed to discuss and summarize the current literature. Modern trials have been recently published for both treatment-naïve patients (POP-RT trial) and patients after surgery (SPPORT trial). Although there are more reliable data to date, we identified several limitations currently complicating the definitions of general recommendations. For patients with cN0 (conventional or PSMA-PET staging) undergoing definitive radiotherapy, only men with high-risk factors for nodal involvement (e.g., cT3a, GS ≥ 8, PSA ≥ 20 ng/ml) seem to benefit from ENI. For biochemical relapse in the postoperative situation (pN0) and no PSMA imaging, ENI may be added to patients with risk factors according to the SPPORT trial (e.g., GS ≥ 8; PSA > 0.7 ng/ml). If PSMA-PET/CT is negative, ENI may be offered for selected men with high-risk factors as an individual treatment approach.

Dosiomics and radiomics-based prediction of pneumonitis after radiotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibition: The relevance of fractionation

OBJECTIVES

Post-therapy pneumonitis (PTP) is a relevant side effect of thoracic radiotherapy and immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). The influence of the combination of both, including dose fractionation schemes on PTP development is still unclear. This study aims to improve the PTP risk estimation after radio(chemo)therapy (R(C)T) for lung cancer with and without ICI by investigation of the impact of dose fractionation on machine learning (ML)-based prediction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from 100 patients who received fractionated R(C)T were collected. 39 patients received additional ICI therapy. Computed Tomography (CT), RT segmentation and dose data were extracted and physical doses were converted to 2-Gy equivalent doses (EQD2) to account for different fractionation schemes. Features were reduced using Pearson intercorrelation and the Boruta algorithm within 1000-fold bootstrapping. Six single (clinics, Dose Volume Histogram (DVH), ICI, chemotherapy, radiomics, dosiomics) and four combined models (radiomics + dosiomics, radiomics + DVH + Clinics, dosiomics + DVH + Clinics, radiomics + dosiomics + DVH + Clinics) were trained to predict PTP. Dose-based models were tested using physical dose and EQD2. Four ML-algorithms (random forest (rf), logistic elastic net regression, support vector machine, logitBoost) were trained and tested using 5-fold nested cross validation and Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) for resampling in R. Prediction was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) on the test sets of the outer folds.

RESULTS

The combined model of all features using EQD2 surpassed all other models (AUC = 0.77, Confidence Interval CI 0.76-0.78). DVH, clinical data and ICI therapy had minor impact on PTP prediction with AUC values between 0.42 and 0.57. All EQD2-based models outperformed models based on physical dose.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiomics + dosiomics based ML models combined with clinical and dosimetric models were found to be suited best for PTP prediction after R(C)T and could improve pre-treatment decision making. Different RT dose fractionation schemes should be considered for dose-based ML approaches.

What MRI Sequences are Necessary for Automated Neural Network-Based Metastasis Segmentation - An Ablation Study

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Brain metastasis (BM) delineation is a time-consuming process in both daily clinical practice and research. Automated BM segmentation algorithms can be used to assist in this task. Most approaches to brain tumor segmentation, such as algorithms trained on the BraTS challenge, use four magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences as input, making them susceptible to missing or corrupted sequences and increase the number of sequences necessary for MRI RT planning. The goal of this project is to compare neural networks with different combinations of input sequences for the segmentation of the contrast-enhancing metastasis and the surrounding FLAIR hyperintense edema. All models were tested in a multicenter international external test cohort. This allows us to determine which MRI sequences are needed for effective automated segmentations.

MATERIALS/METHODS

In total, we had T1-weighted sequences without (T1) and with contrast enhancement (T1-CE), T2-weighted sequences (T2), and T2 fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences from 339 patients with at least one brain metastasis from seven centers available. Preprocessing yielded co-registered, skull-stripped sequences with an isotropic resolution of 1 millimeter. The contrast-enhancing metastasis as well as the surrounding FLAIR hyperintense edema were manually segmented to create reference labels. A baseline 3D U-Net with all four sequences as well as six additional U-Nets with different clinically plausible combinations (T1-CE; T1; FLAIR; T1-CE+FLAIR; T1-CE+T1+FLAIR; T1-CE+T1) of input sequences were trained on a cohort of 239 patients from two centers and subsequently tested on an external cohort of 100 patients from the remaining five centers.

RESULTS

All models that included T1-CE in their selected sequences showed similar performance for metastasis segmentation with a median Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 0.93-0.96. T1-CE alone likewise achieved a performance of 0.96 (IQR 0.93-0.97). The model trained with only FLAIR performed worse (DSC = 0.73, IQR 0.54-0.84). For edema segmentation, models that included both T1-CE and FLAIR performed best (median DSC = 0.93), while the remaining four models without simultaneous inclusion of these two sequences (T1-CE; T1; FLAIR; T1-CE+T1) reached a median DSC of 0.81-0.89.

CONCLUSION

Automatic segmentation of brain metastases with less than four input sequences is feasible with minimal or no loss of quality. A T1-CE-only protocol suffices for metastasis segmentation. In contrast, for edema segmentation, the combination of T1-CE and FLAIR seems to be important. Missing either T1-CE or FLAIR decreases performance. These findings may improve future imaging routines by omitting unnecessary sequences, thus speeding up procedures in daily clinical practice while allowing for optimal neural network-based target definitions.

The Value of Equivalent Dose Calculation for Dosiomics and Radiomics-Based Prediction of Pneumonitis after Thoracic Radiotherapy with Immune Checkpoint Inhibition

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Post-therapy pneumonitis (PTP) is a relevant side effect after thoracic radiotherapy (RT) and immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). The impact of the combination of both is unclear. We aim to improve risk estimation by prediction of PTP with and without ICI therapy. To analyze the influence of different fractionation schemes, the value of voxel-wise 2 Gy equivalent dose (EQD2) is investigated.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Clinical data from 100 patients who received fractionated RT (single dose ≤ 3Gy) RT were collected. 36 patients received additional ICI therapy. PTP of all grades were monitored. Planning Computed tomographies (CTs), segmentations and 3D dose data were extracted and converted to EQD2. Dosiomics and radiomics features were extracted using 1000-fold bootstrapping using Pearson intercorrelation and the Boruta algorithm for 5 single and 4 combined predictive models. Machine learning algorithms (random forest (rf), logistic elastic net regression, support vector machine, logitBoost) were trained and tested using a 5-fold nested cross validation approach and Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique resampling in R. Analysis was performed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) on the test sets of the outer folds.

RESULTS

All investigated models predicted PTP better than random (AUC>.5) (Table 1). Dosiomics+Radiomics models based on EQD2 using rf classifier resulted in the highest predictive performance (AUC = .83 (95% Confidence Interval .83-.84)) and performed worse on physical dose data (AUC = .72 (.71-.73)). For single models, radiomics and dosiomics achieved the best prediction (AUC = .73 (.72-.74), AUC = .8 (.79-.81)) for physical dose and EQD2, respectively. Clinical factors and ICI therapy (AUC = .6 (.59-.62)) had minor impact on PTP prediction. Table 1: AUC and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for all investigated Machine Learning models for EQD2 and physical doses (D).

CONCLUSION

Dosiomics+Radiomics machine learning models have strong capability of PTP prediction and could contribute to pre-treatment decision making. Fractionation schemes should be considered for dose-based prediction strategies. Additional ICI therapy has limited impact on PTP prediction.

Post-Operative Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Resected Brain Metastases: Results of the Multicenter Analysis (AURORA) of the German Working Group "Stereotactic Radiotherapy"

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

While the results of prospective studies support the use of postoperative stereotactic radiotherapy (RT) to the resection cavity (RC) as the standard of care after surgery, there are several issues that need to be investigated such as factors for improving local control, risk of leptomeningeal disease and radiation necrosis. Further, the optimal dose and fractionation is still under debate.

MATERIALS/METHODS

The working group "Stereotactic Radiotherapy" of the German Society of Radiation Oncology (DEGRO) analyzed its multi-institutional database with 661 patients who received postoperative stereotactic RT to the RC. Treatment was performed at 13 centers between 2008 and 2021. Patient characteristics, treatment details, and follow-up data including overall survival (OS), local control (LC) were evaluated. Cox Regression and Kaplan-Meier curves with Log-rank Tests were calculated for selected variables.

RESULTS

In this retrospective study, overall survival was 61.5% at 1 year, 47.6% at 2 years, and 35.5% at 3 years, and local control was 84.6% at 1 year, 74.8% at 2 years, and 72.8% at 3 years. 96% of patients were treated with hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HSRT), only 26 patients received single fraction radiosurgery (4%). Prognostic factors associated with overall survival were Karnofsky Performance Status, RPA and GPA class, controlled primary tumor and absence of extracranial metastases, whereas prognostic factor associated with local control was planning target volume (23 mL or less).

CONCLUSION

HSRT is the most common fractionation form in the treatment of RCs in this multicenter analysis. This approach results in excellent OS and LC outcomes. OS in patients with resected brain metastases is mainly influenced by performance status. In regard to local control, RT of large cavities remain a challenge with significantly worse outcome.

Dosiomics and radiomics to predict pneumonitis after thoracic stereotactic body radiotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibition

Introduction

Pneumonitis is a relevant side effect after radiotherapy (RT) and immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Since the effect is radiation dose dependent, the risk increases for high fractional doses as applied for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and might even be enhanced for the combination of SBRT with ICI therapy. Hence, patient individual pre-treatment prediction of post-treatment pneumonitis (PTP) might be able to support clinical decision making. Dosimetric factors, however, use limited information and, thus, cannot exploit the full potential of pneumonitis prediction.

Methods

We investigated dosiomics and radiomics model based approaches for PTP prediction after thoracic SBRT with and without ICI therapy. To overcome potential influences of different fractionation schemes, we converted physical doses to 2 Gy equivalent doses (EQD2) and compared both results. In total, four single feature models (dosiomics, radiomics, dosimetric, clinical factors) were tested and five combinations of those (dosimetric+clinical factors, dosiomics+radiomics, dosiomics+dosimetric+clinical factors, radiomics+dosimetric+clinical factors, radiomics+dosiomics+dosimetric+clinical factors). After feature extraction, a feature reduction was performed using pearson intercorrelation coefficient and the Boruta algorithm within 1000-fold bootstrapping runs. Four different machine learning models and the combination of those were trained and tested within 100 iterations of 5-fold nested cross validation.

Results

Results were analysed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). We found the combination of dosiomics and radiomics features to outperform all other models with AUCradiomics+dosiomics, D = 0.79 (95% confidence interval 0.78-0.80) and AUCradiomics+dosiomics, EQD2 = 0.77 (0.76-0.78) for physical dose and EQD2, respectively. ICI therapy did not impact the prediction result (AUC ≤ 0.5). Clinical and dosimetric features for the total lung did not improve the prediction outcome.

Conclusion

Our results suggest that combined dosiomics and radiomics analysis can improve PTP prediction in patients treated with lung SBRT. We conclude that pre-treatment prediction could support clinical decision making on an individual patient basis with or without ICI therapy.

"Radio-oncomics" : The potential of radiomics in radiation oncology

INTRODUCTION

Radiomics, a recently introduced concept, describes quantitative computerized algorithm-based feature extraction from imaging data including computer tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRT), or positron-emission tomography (PET) images. For radiation oncology it offers the potential to significantly influence clinical decision-making and thus therapy planning and follow-up workflow.

METHODS

After image acquisition, image preprocessing, and defining regions of interest by structure segmentation, algorithms are applied to calculate shape, intensity, texture, and multiscale filter features. By combining multiple features and correlating them with clinical outcome, prognostic models can be created.

RESULTS

Retrospective studies have proposed radiomics classifiers predicting, e. g., overall survival, radiation treatment response, distant metastases, or radiation-related toxicity. Besides, radiomics features can be correlated with genomic information ("radiogenomics") and could be used for tumor characterization.

DISCUSSION

Distinct patterns based on data-based as well as genomics-based features will influence radiation oncology in the future. Individualized treatments in terms of dose level adaption and target volume definition, as well as other outcome-related parameters will depend on radiomics and radiogenomics. By integration of various datasets, the prognostic power can be increased making radiomics a valuable part of future precision medicine approaches.

CONCLUSION

This perspective demonstrates the evidence for the radiomics concept in radiation oncology. The necessity of further studies to integrate radiomics classifiers into clinical decision-making and the radiation therapy workflow is emphasized.