1
|
van Munster KN, Mol B, Goet JC, van Munster SN, Weersma RK, de Vries AC, van der Meer AJ, Inderson A, Drenth JP, van Erpecum KJ, Boonstra K, Beuers U, Dijkgraaf MGW, Ponsioen CY. Disease burden in primary sclerosing cholangitis in the Netherlands: A long-term follow-up study. Liver Int 2023; 43:639-648. [PMID: 36328957 DOI: 10.1111/liv.15471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2022] [Revised: 08/31/2022] [Accepted: 10/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a progressive, cholestatic liver disease which greatly impacts the lives of individuals. Burden of disease due to shortened life expectancy and impaired quality of life is ill-described. The aim of this study was to assess long-term disease burden in a large population-based registry with regard to survival, clinical course, quality adjusted life years (QALYs), medical consumption and work productivity loss. METHODS All PSC patients living in a geographically defined area covering ~50% of the Netherlands were included, together with patients from the three liver transplant centres. Survival was estimated by competing risk analysis. Proportional shortfall of QALYs during disease course was measured relative to a matched reference cohort using validated questionnaires. Work productivity loss and medical consumption were evaluated over time. RESULTS A total of 1208 patients were included with a median follow-up of 11.2 year. Median liver transplant-free survival was 21.0 years. Proportional shortfall of QALYs increased to 48% >25 years after diagnosis. Patients had on average 12.4 hospital contact days among which 3.17 admission days per year, annual medical costs were €12 169 and mean work productivity loss was 25%. CONCLUSIONS Our data quantify for the first time disease burden in terms of QALYs lost, clinical events, medical consumption, costs as well as work productivity loss, and show that all these are substantial and increase over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kim N van Munster
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, location AMC, Amsterdam Gastroenterology, Endocrinology & Metabolism, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bregje Mol
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, location AMC, Amsterdam Gastroenterology, Endocrinology & Metabolism, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jorn C Goet
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sanne N van Munster
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, location AMC, Amsterdam Gastroenterology, Endocrinology & Metabolism, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rinse K Weersma
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Annemarie C de Vries
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Adriaan J van der Meer
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Akin Inderson
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Joost P Drenth
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Karel J van Erpecum
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Kirsten Boonstra
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, location VUmc, Amsterdam Gastroenterology & Metabolism, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ulrich Beuers
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, location AMC, Amsterdam Gastroenterology, Endocrinology & Metabolism, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marcel G W Dijkgraaf
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam University Medical Center, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Cyriel Y Ponsioen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, location AMC, Amsterdam Gastroenterology, Endocrinology & Metabolism, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Goet JC, Floreani A, Verhelst X, Cazzagon N, Perini L, Lammers WJ, de Vries AC, van der Meer AJ, van Buuren HR, Hansen BE. Validation, clinical utility and limitations of the Amsterdam-Oxford model for primary sclerosing cholangitis. J Hepatol 2019; 71:992-999. [PMID: 31278949 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.06.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2018] [Revised: 05/20/2019] [Accepted: 06/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Recently the Amsterdam-Oxford model (AOM) was introduced as a prognostic model to assess the risk of death and/or liver transplantation (LT) in primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). We aimed to validate and assess the utility of the AOM. METHODS Clinical and laboratory data were collected from the time of PSC diagnosis until the last visit or time of LT or death. The AOM was calculated at yearly intervals following PSC diagnosis. Discriminatory performance was assessed by calculation of the C-statistic and prediction accuracy by comparing the predicted survival with the observed survival in Kaplan-Meier estimates. A grid search was performed to identify the most discriminatory AOM threshold. RESULTS A total of 534 patients with PSC and a mean (SD) age of 39.2 (13.1) years were included. The diagnosis was large duct PSC in 466 (87%), PSC with features of autoimmune hepatitis in 52 (10%) and small-duct PSC in 16 (3%). During the median (IQR) follow-up of 7.8 (4.0-12.6) years, 167 patients underwent LT and 65 died. The median LT-free survival was 13.2 (11.8-14.7) years. The C-statistic of the AOM ranged from 0.67 at baseline to 0.75 at 5 years of follow-up. The difference between the predicted and observed survival ranged from -1.6% at 1 year to + 3.9% at 5 years of follow-up. Patients that developed AOM scores >2.0 were at significant risk of LT or death (time-dependent hazard ratio 4.09; 95% CI 2.99-5.61). CONCLUSIONS In this large cohort of patients with PSC, the AOM showed an adequate discriminative performance and good prediction accuracy at PSC diagnosis and during follow-up. This study further validates the AOM as a valuable risk stratification tool in PSC and extends its utility. LAY SUMMARY In our study we assessed whether the Amsterdam-Oxford model (AOM) is able to correctly estimate the risk of liver transplantation or death in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). This model uses 7 objective and readily available variables to estimate prognosis for individual patients at the time of PSC diagnosis. The AOM may aid in patient counselling and timing of diagnostic procedures or therapeutic interventions for complications of liver disease. We confirm that the model works well at PSC diagnosis, but also when the AOM is recalculated at different timepoints during follow-up, greatly improving the applicability of the model in clinical practice and for individual patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jorn C Goet
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Annarosa Floreani
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Xavier Verhelst
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ghent University Hospital, Belgium
| | - Nora Cazzagon
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Lisa Perini
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Willem J Lammers
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Annemarie C de Vries
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Adriaan J van der Meer
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Henk R van Buuren
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bettina E Hansen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Toronto Centre for Liver Disease, Toronto General Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Goet JC, Hirschfield GM. Guideline review: British Society of Gastroenterology/UK-PBC Primary Biliary Cholangitis treatment and management guidelines. Frontline Gastroenterol 2019; 10:316-319. [PMID: 31281627 PMCID: PMC6583568 DOI: 10.1136/flgastro-2018-101109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2018] [Revised: 12/10/2018] [Accepted: 12/16/2018] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
New guidelines have been produced for the management of primary biliary cholangitis, an infrequent but nonetheless important autoimmune liver disease. We provide a succient commentary and overview of the key features of disease management that arise from these recent guideline recommendations, with a focus on therapy with licensed agents (ursodeoxycholic acid and obeticholic acid) as well as personalised management of disease complications and associated symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jorn C Goet
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gideon M Hirschfield
- Toronto Centre for Liver Disease, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Goet JC, Beelen EMJ, Biermann KE, Gijsbers AH, Schouten WR, van der Woude CJ, de Vries AC. Cholecystectomy Risk in Crohn's Disease Patients After Ileal Resection: a Long-term Nationwide Cohort Study. J Gastrointest Surg 2019; 23:1840-1847. [PMID: 30411310 PMCID: PMC6702183 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-018-4028-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2018] [Accepted: 10/22/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The risk of gallstone disease necessitating cholecystectomy after ileal resection (IR) in Crohn's disease (CD) patients is not well established. We studied the incidence, cumulative and relative risk of cholecystectomy after IR in CD patients, and associated risk factors. METHODS CD patients with a first IR between 1991 and 2015 were identified in PALGA, a nationwide pathology database in the Netherlands. Details on subsequent cholecystectomy and IR were recorded. Yearly cholecystectomy rates from the general Dutch population were used as a reference. RESULTS A cohort of 8302 (3466 (41.7%) males) CD patients after IR was identified. During the 11.9 (IQR 6.3-18.0) years median follow-up, the post-IR incidence rate of cholecystectomy was 5.2 (95% CI 3.5-6.4)/1000 persons/year. The cumulative incidence was 0.5% at 1 year, 2.4% at 5 years, 4.6% at 10 years, and 10.3% after 20 years. In multivariable analyses, female sex (HR 1.9, CI 1.5-2.3), a later calendar year of first IR (HR/5-year increase, HR 1.27, CI 1.18-1.35), and ileal re-resection (time-dependent HR 1.37, CI 1.06-1.77) were associated with cholecystectomy. In the last decade, cholecystectomy rates increased and were higher in our postoperative CD population than in the general population (relative incidence ratio 3.13 (CI 2.29-4.28; p < 0.0001) in 2015). CONCLUSIONS Although higher in females, increasing in recent years, and higher than in the general population, the overall risk of cholecystectomy in CD patients following IR is low and routine prophylactic measures seem unwarranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jorn C. Goet
- 000000040459992Xgrid.5645.2Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Evelien M. J. Beelen
- 000000040459992Xgrid.5645.2Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Katharina E. Biermann
- 000000040459992Xgrid.5645.2Department of Pathology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Annette H. Gijsbers
- The nationwide network and registry of histopathology and cytopathology in the Netherlands (PALGA), Houten, Netherlands
| | - W. Rudolph Schouten
- 000000040459992Xgrid.5645.2Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C. Janneke van der Woude
- 000000040459992Xgrid.5645.2Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Annemarie C. de Vries
- 000000040459992Xgrid.5645.2Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Montano-Loza AJ, Hansen BE, Corpechot C, Roccarina D, Thorburn D, Trivedi P, Hirschfield G, McDowell P, Poupon R, Dumortier J, Bosch A, Giostria E, Conti F, Parés A, Reig A, Floreani A, Russo FP, Goet JC, Harms MH, van Buuren H, Van den Ende N, Nevens F, Verhelst X, Donato MF, Malinverno F, Ebadi M, Mason AL. Factors Associated With Recurrence of Primary Biliary Cholangitis After Liver Transplantation and Effects on Graft and Patient Survival. Gastroenterology 2019; 156:96-107.e1. [PMID: 30296431 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2018] [Revised: 09/18/2018] [Accepted: 10/02/2018] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) frequently recurs after liver transplantation. We evaluated risk factors associated with recurrence of PBC and its effects on patient and graft survival in a multicenter, international cohort (the Global PBC Study Group). METHODS We collected demographic and clinical data from 785 patients (89% female) with PBC who underwent liver transplantation (mean age, 54 ± 9 years) from February 1983 through June 2016, among 13 centers in North America and Europe. Results from biochemical tests performed within 12 months of liver transplantation were analyzed to determine whether markers of cholestasis could identify patients with recurrence of PBC (based on histologic analysis). Patients were followed for a median 6.9 years (interquartile range, 6.1-7.9 years). RESULTS PBC recurred in 22% of patients after 5 years and 36% after 10 years. Age at diagnosis <50 years (hazard ratio [HR], 1.79; 95% CI, 1.36-2.36; P < .001), age at liver transplantation <60 years (HR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.02-1.90; P = .04), use of tacrolimus (HR, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.72-3.10; P < .001), and biochemical markers of severe cholestasis (bilirubin ≥100 μmol or alkaline phosphatase >3-fold the upper limit of normal) at 6 months after liver transplantation (HR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.16-2.76; P = .008) were associated with higher risk of PBC recurrence, whereas use of cyclosporine reduced risk of PBC recurrence (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.46-0.82; P = .001). In multivariable Cox regression with time-dependent covariate, recurrence of PBC significantly associated with graft loss (HR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.16-3.51; P = .01) and death (HR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.11-2.65; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS Younger age at the time of diagnosis with PBC or at liver transplantation, tacrolimus use, and biochemical markers of cholestasis after liver transplantation are associated with PBC recurrence. PBC recurrence reduces odds of graft and patient survival. Strategies are needed to prevent PBC recurrence or reduce its negative effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aldo J Montano-Loza
- Division of Gastroenterology and Liver Unit, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
| | - Bettina E Hansen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Christophe Corpechot
- Reference Center for Inflammatory Biliary Diseases, Saint-Antoine Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Davide Roccarina
- University College London Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, Royal Free Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Douglas Thorburn
- University College London Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, Royal Free Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Palak Trivedi
- National Institute for Health Research, Centre for Liver Research, University Hospitals Birmingham, Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Gideon Hirschfield
- National Institute for Health Research, Centre for Liver Research, University Hospitals Birmingham, Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, United Kingdom; Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals Birmingham National Health Service Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Toronto Centre for Liver Disease, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Patrick McDowell
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals Birmingham National Health Service Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Raoul Poupon
- Reference Center for Inflammatory Biliary Diseases, Saint-Antoine Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Jerome Dumortier
- Liver Transplant Unit, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Alexie Bosch
- Liver Transplant Unit, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Emiliano Giostria
- Hepatology and Gastroenterology Department, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Filomena Conti
- Liver Transplant Unit, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hôpital, Paris France
| | - Albert Parés
- Liver Unit, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, The August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute, Biomedical Research Networking Center in Hepatic and Digestive Diseases, Barcelona Spain
| | - Anna Reig
- Liver Unit, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, The August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute, Biomedical Research Networking Center in Hepatic and Digestive Diseases, Barcelona Spain
| | - Annarosa Floreani
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Francesco Paolo Russo
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Jorn C Goet
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maren H Harms
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Henk van Buuren
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Frederik Nevens
- Division Liver and Biliopancreatic Disorders, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Xavier Verhelst
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Maria Francesca Donato
- Transplant Hepatology Unit, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maggiore Hospital Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Malinverno
- Transplant Hepatology Unit, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maggiore Hospital Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Maryam Ebadi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Liver Unit, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Andrew L Mason
- Division of Gastroenterology and Liver Unit, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Goet JC, Harms MH, Carbone M, Hansen BE. Risk stratification and prognostic modelling in primary biliary cholangitis. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2018; 34-35:95-106. [PMID: 30343715 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2018.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2018] [Accepted: 06/08/2018] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a slowly progressive chronic cholestatic liver disease that, in a subgroup of patients, may result in liver failure or death. The definition of specific risk profiles, i.e. risk stratification, is of critical importance for the identification of these subgroups and thereby the targeting of care. Over the last few years large multicentre cohort studies have improved our knowledge regarding factors associated with progressive disease. Stratification based on biochemical response to ursodoxycholic acid provides a readily available measure to identify groups that might benefit from additional therapies to further improve prognosis. In addition, serum total bilirubin and alkaline phosphatase are now considered the most robustly validated biomarkers of long-term outcome in PBC and are used as endpoints in clinical trials. The GLOBE score and UK-PBC risk score enable us to quantify the risk of future events for the individual patient, allowing more individualized risk prediction. In this review, we discuss both established prognostic factors and newly developed tools to estimate prognosis in PBC, highlighting their strengths, limitations and applicability in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jorn C Goet
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Maren H Harms
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Marco Carbone
- Division of Gastroenterology and Program for Autoimmune Liver Diseases, International Center for Digestive Health, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
| | - Bettina E Hansen
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Toronto Centre for Liver Disease, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Murillo Perez CF, Goet JC, Lammers WJ, Gulamhusein A, van Buuren HR, Ponsioen CY, Carbone M, Mason A, Corpechot C, Invernizzi P, Mayo MJ, Battezzati PM, Floreani A, Pares A, Nevens F, Kowdley KV, Bruns T, Dalekos GN, Thorburn D, Hirschfield G, LaRusso NF, Lindor KD, Zachou K, Poupon R, Trivedi PJ, Verhelst X, Janssen HLA, Hansen BE. Milder disease stage in patients with primary biliary cholangitis over a 44-year period: A changing natural history. Hepatology 2018; 67:1920-1930. [PMID: 29220537 DOI: 10.1002/hep.29717] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2017] [Revised: 11/21/2017] [Accepted: 12/02/2017] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Changes over time in the presenting features and clinical course of patients with primary biliary cholangitis are poorly described. We sought to describe temporal trends in patient and disease characteristics over a 44-year period across a large international primary biliary cholangitis cohort of 4,805 patients diagnosed between 1970 and 2014, from 17 centers across Europe and North America. Patients were divided into five cohorts according to their year of diagnosis: 1970-1979 (n = 143), 1980-1989 (n = 858), 1990-1999 (n = 1,754), 2000-2009 (n = 1,815), and ≥2010 (n = 235). Age at diagnosis, disease stage, response to ursodeoxycholic acid, and clinical outcomes were compared. Mean age at diagnosis increased incrementally by 2-3 years per decade from 46.9 ± 10.1 years in the 1970s to 57.0 ± 12.1 years from 2010 onward (P < 0.001). The female to male ratio (9:1) and antimitochondrial antibody positivity (90%) were not significantly variable. The proportion of patients presenting with mild biochemical disease (according to Rotterdam staging) increased from 41.3% in the 1970s to 72.2% in the 1990s (P < 0.001) and remained relatively stable thereafter. Patients with a mild histological stage at diagnosis increased from 60.4% (1970-1989) to 76.5% (1990-2014) (P < 0.001). Correspondingly, response to ursodeoxycholic acid according to Paris-I criteria increased; 51.7% in the 1970s and 70.5% in the 1990s (P < 0.001). Recent decades were also characterized by lower decompensation rates (18.5% in the 1970s to 5.8% in the 2000s, P < 0.001) and higher 10-year transplant-free survival (48.4%, 68.7%, 79.7%, and 80.1% for each respective cohort; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION In recent decades, a pattern of primary biliary cholangitis presentation consistent with an older age at diagnosis alongside reduced disease severity has been noted; the observed trends may be explained by an increase in routine testing of liver function and/or a changing environmental trigger. (Hepatology 2018;67:1920-1930).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carla F Murillo Perez
- Toronto Centre for Liver Disease, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Insitute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jorn C Goet
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Willem J Lammers
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Aliya Gulamhusein
- Toronto Centre for Liver Disease, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Henk R van Buuren
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Cyriel Y Ponsioen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marco Carbone
- Division of Gastroenterology and Center for Autoimmune Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrew Mason
- Divison of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Christophe Corpechot
- Centre de Référence des Maladies Inflammatoires des VoiesBiliaires, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Paris, France
| | - Pietro Invernizzi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Center for Autoimmune Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Marlyn J Mayo
- Digestive and Liver diseases, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | | | - Annarosa Floreani
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Albert Pares
- Liver Unit, Hospital Clínic, CIBERehd, IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Frederik Nevens
- Department of Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Tony Bruns
- Department of Internal Medicine IV, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University of Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - George N Dalekos
- Department of Medicine and Research Laboratory of Internal Medicine, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece
| | - Douglas Thorburn
- The Sheila Sherlock Liver Centre, The Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Gideon Hirschfield
- NIHR, Biomedical Research Centre and Centre for Liver Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | | | - Kalliopi Zachou
- Department of Medicine and Research Laboratory of Internal Medicine, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece
| | - Raoul Poupon
- Centre de Référence des Maladies Inflammatoires des VoiesBiliaires, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Paris, France
| | - Palak J Trivedi
- NIHR, Biomedical Research Centre and Centre for Liver Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Xavier Verhelst
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Harry L A Janssen
- Toronto Centre for Liver Disease, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Bettina E Hansen
- Toronto Centre for Liver Disease, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Goet JC, Hansen BE, Tieleman M, van Hoek B, van den Berg AP, Polak WG, Dubbeld J, Porte RJ, Konijn-Janssen C, de Man RA, Metselaar HJ, de Vries AC. Current policy for allocation of donor livers in the Netherlands advantages primary sclerosing cholangitis patients on the liver transplantation waiting list-a retrospective study. Transpl Int 2017; 31:590-599. [DOI: 10.1111/tri.13097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2017] [Revised: 09/18/2017] [Accepted: 11/12/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jorn C. Goet
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology; Erasmus University Medical Center; Rotterdam The Netherlands
| | - Bettina E. Hansen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology; Erasmus University Medical Center; Rotterdam The Netherlands
- Toronto Center for Liver Disease; Toronto General Hospital; University of Toronto; Toronto Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation; University of Toronto; Toronto Canada
| | - Madelon Tieleman
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology; Erasmus University Medical Center; Rotterdam The Netherlands
| | - Bart van Hoek
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology; Leiden University Medical Center; Leiden The Netherlands
| | - Aad P. van den Berg
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology; University Medical Center Groningen; Groningen The Netherlands
| | - Wojciech G. Polak
- Department of Surgery; Erasmus University Medical Center; Rotterdam The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen Dubbeld
- Department of Surgery; Leiden University Medical Center; Leiden The Netherlands
| | - Robert J. Porte
- Department of Surgery; University Medical Center Groningen; Groningen The Netherlands
| | | | - Robert A. de Man
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology; Erasmus University Medical Center; Rotterdam The Netherlands
| | - Herold J. Metselaar
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology; Erasmus University Medical Center; Rotterdam The Netherlands
| | - Annemarie C. de Vries
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology; Erasmus University Medical Center; Rotterdam The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Oterdoom LH, Goet JC, Jacobs MAJM, Mulder CJJ. Ultra-thin caliber endoscopes in daily practice: uses for therapeutic application and beyond on the basis of review of 1028 procedures. Endosc Int Open 2015; 3:E400-4. [PMID: 26528492 PMCID: PMC4612248 DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1392363] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2014] [Accepted: 05/04/2015] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS Ultra-thin caliber endoscopes (UTCEs) are versatile and applicable in various conditions. However, only limited data exist on the actual daily clinical use of UTCEs. The aim of our study was to determine indications for UTCEs in a large patient cohort. In turn, our 2 main objectives were (1) to evaluate patient comfort and safety and (2) to determine benefits and potential advantages associated with the use of UTCEs in this same cohort. PATIENTS AND METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of our prospective database of 1028 procedures with UTCEs in 457 patients. All procedures were carried out in the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, VU University Medical Center, in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, between May 2008 and May 2014. In these procedures, either the Fujinon (Tokyo, Japan) EG-530N UTCE or the Olympus (Tokyo, Japan) GIF N-180 UTCE was used. RESULTS Mean (standard deviation [SD]) age of patients was 64 (20) years, and most (60 %) of the patients were men. Most (61 %) of the underlying diseases, requiring endoscopic procedures, were found in the esophagus. Of the procedures performed, 91 % were successful, and 82 % were therapeutic. In comparison with regular endoscopes, the most important advantage of the UTCE was the ability to pass a stenosis (37 %), followed by nasogastric feeding tube placement (13 %). Newer and more innovative uses of the UTCE were percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG)-jejunal extension placement with endoscope introduction through existing PEG tract, retrograde esophageal introduction through existing PEG tract, inspection of colonic neovagina stenosis, and direct inspection of the common bile duct. CONCLUSIONS In everyday clinical practice, the UTCE has specific advantages over conventional endoscopes because of its small caliber. The 3 main advantages are (1) introduction of high-grade strictures; (2) introduction of fistulas, including PEG fistula; and (3) increased patient comfort. The endoscopist should appreciate these advantages and consider use of the UTCE accordingly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leendert H. Oterdoom
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands,Corresponding author: Leendert H. Oterdoom, MD, PhD Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyVU University Medical CenterPO Box 70571007 MB Amsterdamthe Netherlands+31-20-4440554
| | - Jorn C. Goet
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Maarten A. J. M. Jacobs
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Chris J. J. Mulder
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|