Can strength training or tai ji quan training reduce frailty in postmenopausal women treated with chemotherapy? A secondary data analysis of the GET FIT trial

PURPOSE

To determine whether strength training or tai ji quan can reduce frailty in older, postmenopausal women treated with chemotherapy for cancer.

METHODS

We conducted a secondary data analysis from a 3-arm, single-blind, randomized controlled trial where older (50-75 years), postmenopausal women cancer survivors were randomized to supervised group exercise programs: tai ji quan, strength training, or stretching control for 6 months. We assessed frailty using a 4-criteria model consisting of weakness, fatigue, inactivity, and slowness. Using logistic regression, we determined whether the frailty phenotype (pre-frailty or frailty) decreased post-intervention, how many and which frailty criteria decreased, and what characteristics identified women most likely to reduce frailty.

RESULTS

Data from 386 women who completed baseline and 6-month testing were used (mean age of 62.0 ± 6.4 years). The odds of reducing overall frailty over 6 months were significantly higher in the strength training group compared to controls (OR [95%CI] 1.86 [1.09, 3.17]) but not for tai ji quan (1.44 [0.84, 2.50]). Both strength training (OR 1.99 [1.10, 3.65]) and tai ji quan (OR 2.10 [1.16, 3.84]) led to significantly higher odds of reducing ≥ 1 frailty criterion compared to controls. Strength training led to a three-fold reduction in inactivity (p < 0.01) and tai ji quan to a two-fold reduction in fatigue (p = 0.08) versus control. Higher baseline BMI, comorbidity score, and frailty status characterized women were more likely to reduce frailty than other women.

CONCLUSIONS

Strength training appears superior to tai ji quan and stretching with respect to reducing overall frailty phenotype among postmenopausal women treated with chemotherapy for cancer, but tai ji quan favorably reduced the number of frailty criteria.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: GET FIT was registered as a clinical trial in clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01635413.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

Supervised, group exercise training that emphasizes strength training and/or tai ji quan may help combat accelerated aging and reduce frailty after cancer treatment.

Assessing Life's Essential 8 and Adverse Childhood Experiences in Grandparent-Grandchild Co-residing Dyads

We assessed a subset of behavioral indicators from the American Heart Association Life's Essential 8 cardiovascular health (CVH) construct-diet, physical activity, sleep, and nicotine exposure-and quantified associations in scores between members of 12 grandparent-grandchild dyads (grandparents, 52-70 years old; children, 7-12 years old). We also assessed the number of adverse childhood experiences from the dyads. Using the Life's Essential 8 scoring algorithm (0-100, with 100 as optimal), we calculated averages and used Spearman's ρ correlation to quantify associations. Mean score was 67.5 (±12.4) for grandparents and 63.0 (±11.2) for grandchildren. Mean scores for the dyad members were significantly correlated ( r = 0.66, P < .05). The mean numbers of adverse childhood experiences were 7.0 and 5.8 for the grandparents and grandchildren, respectively. The results indicate that CVH in these dyads was suboptimal and interrelated. Adverse childhood experiences in this analysis surpass levels reported as high risk for poor CVH. Our findings suggest that dyadic-based interventions to improve CVH are warranted.

Dropout from exercise trials among cancer survivors-An individual patient data meta-analysis from the POLARIS study

INTRODUCTION

The number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effects of exercise among cancer survivors has increased in recent years; however, participants dropping out of the trials are rarely described. The objective of the present study was to assess which combinations of participant and exercise program characteristics were associated with dropout from the exercise arms of RCTs among cancer survivors.

METHODS

This study used data collected in the Predicting OptimaL cAncer RehabIlitation and Supportive care (POLARIS) study, an international database of RCTs investigating the effects of exercise among cancer survivors. Thirty-four exercise trials, with a total of 2467 patients without metastatic disease randomized to an exercise arm were included. Harmonized studies included a pre and a posttest, and participants were classified as dropouts when missing all assessments at the post-intervention test. Subgroups were identified with a conditional inference tree.

RESULTS

Overall, 9.6% of the participants dropped out. Five subgroups were identified in the conditional inference tree based on four significant associations with dropout. Most dropout was observed for participants with BMI >28.4 kg/m2 , performing supervised resistance or unsupervised mixed exercise (19.8% dropout) or had low-medium education and performed aerobic or supervised mixed exercise (13.5%). The lowest dropout was found for participants with BMI >28.4 kg/m2 and high education performing aerobic or supervised mixed exercise (5.1%), and participants with BMI ≤28.4 kg/m2 exercising during (5.2%) or post (9.5%) treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

There are several systematic differences between cancer survivors completing and dropping out from exercise trials, possibly affecting the external validity of exercise effects.

Identifying trajectories and predictors of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy symptoms, physical functioning, and falls across treatment and recovery in adults treated with neurotoxic chemotherapy: the PATTERN observational study protocol (NCT05790538)

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a debilitating and dose-limiting side effect of systemic cancer therapy. In many cancer survivors, CIPN persists after treatment ends and is associated with functional impairments, abnormal gait patterns, falls, and diminished quality of life. However, little is known regarding which patients are most likely to develop CIPN symptoms that impair mobility and increase fall risk, when this risk develops, or the optimal timing of early intervention efforts to mitigate the impact of CIPN on functioning and fall risk. This study will address these knowledge gaps by (1) characterizing trajectories of symptoms, functioning, and falls before, during, and after treatment in adults prescribed neurotoxic chemotherapy for cancer; and (2) determining the simplest set of predictors for identifying individuals at risk for CIPN-related functional decline and falls.

METHODS

We will enroll 200 participants into a prospective, observational study before initiating chemotherapy and up to 1 year after completing chemotherapy. Eligible participants are aged 40-85 years, diagnosed with stage I-III cancer, and scheduled to receive neurotoxic chemotherapy. We perform objective assessments of vibratory and touch sensation (biothesiometry, tuning fork, monofilament tests), standing and dynamic balance (quiet stance, Timed-Up-and-Go tests), and upper and lower extremity strength (handgrip dynamometry, 5-time repeated chair stand test) in the clinic at baseline, every 4-6 weeks during chemotherapy, and quarterly for 1 year post-chemotherapy. Participants wear devices that passively and continuously measure daily gait quality and physical activity for 1 week after each objective assessment and self-report symptoms (CIPN, insomnia, fatigue, dizziness, pain, cognition, anxiety, and depressive symptoms) and falls via weekly electronic surveys. We will use structural equation modeling, including growth mixture modeling, to examine patterns in trajectories of changes in symptoms, functioning, and falls associated with neurotoxic chemotherapy and then search for distinct risk profiles for CIPN.

DISCUSSION

Identifying simple, early predictors of functional decline and fall risk in adults with cancer receiving neurotoxic chemotherapy will help identify individuals who would benefit from early and targeted interventions to prevent CIPN-related falls and disability.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was retrospectively registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05790538) on 3/30/2023.

Can strength training or tai ji quan training reduce frailty in postmenopausal women treated with chemotherapy? A secondary data analysis of the GET FIT trial

Purpose

To determine whether strength training or tai ji quan can reduce frailty in older, postmenopausal women treated with chemotherapy for cancer.

Methods

We conducted a secondary data analysis from a 3-arm, single-blind, randomized controlled trial where older (50+ years), postmenopausal women cancer survivors were randomized to supervised group exercise programs: tai ji quan, strength training, or stretching control for 6 months. We assessed frailty using a 4-criteria model consisting of weakness, fatigue, inactivity, and slowness. Using logistic regression, we determined whether the frailty phenotype (pre-frailty or frailty) decreased post-intervention, how many and which frailty criteria decreased, and what characteristics identified women most likely to reduce frailty.

Results

Data from 386 women who completed baseline and 6-month testing were used (mean age of 62.0 ± 6.4 years). The odds of improving overall frailty phenotype over 6 months was significantly higher in the strength training group compared to controls (OR [95%CI]: 1.86 [1.09, 3.17]), but not for for tai ji quan (1.44 [0.84, 2.50]). Both strength training (OR 1.99 [1.10, 3.65]) and tai ji quan (OR 2.10 [1.16, 3.84]) led to significantly higher odds of reducing ≥1 frailty criterion compared to controls. Strength training led to a three-fold reduction in inactivity (p <0.01), and tai ji quan to a two-fold reduction in fatigue (p=0.08) versus control. Higher baseline BMI, comorbidity score, and frailty status characterized women more likely to reduce frailty than other women.

Conclusions

Strength training appears superior to tai ji quan and stretching with respect to reducing overall frailty phenotype among postmenopausal women treated with chemotherapy for cancer, but tai ji quan favorably impacted the number of frailty criteria.

Implications for Cancer Survivors

Supervised, group exercise training that emphasizes strength training and/or tai ji quan may help combat accelerated aging and reduce frailty after cancer treatment.

Examining the Mechanisms behind Exercise's Multifaceted Impacts on Body Composition, Cognition, and the Gut Microbiome in Cancer Survivors: Exploring the Links to Oxidative Stress and Inflammation

This review focuses on the effects of exercise on various health-related outcomes in cancer survivors, encompassing body composition, cognitive function (including sleep), and gut microbiome health. By analyzing multiple studies, we aimed to summarize the existing evidence and shed light on underlying mechanisms. The findings strongly suggest that exercise serves as a multifaceted non-pharmacological strategy, playing a significant role in improving the overall health of cancer survivors by effectively reducing inflammation and oxidative stress. Exercise plays a crucial role in preventing muscle wasting, diminishing the presence of reactive oxygen species and pro-inflammatory cytokines, and enhancing antioxidant systems. Furthermore, exercise displays notable benefits in terms of executive cognitive functioning and fatigue alleviation, largely attributed to its anti-inflammatory impact on the central nervous system and its ability to induce neurogenesis via growth factors. Additionally, exercise positively influences microbial diversity, reduces gut inflammation, and enhances neurogenesis through the gut-brain axis. Our key findings underscore the reduction of oxidative stress and inflammation as primary mechanisms by which exercise effectively enhances health outcomes in cancer survivors. By delving deeper into these candidate mechanisms, we aim to provide valuable guidance for future research and interventions targeting the symptoms experienced by cancer survivors.

GET FIT: A Randomized Clinical Trial of Tai Ji Quan Versus Strength Training for Fall Prevention After Chemotherapy in Older, Postmenopausal Women Cancer Survivors

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy of tai ji quan versus strength training to prevent falls after chemotherapy in older, postmenopaual women.

METHODS

We conducted a three-arm, single-blind, randomized controlled trial where older (50+ years), postmenopausal women cancer survivors participated in one of three supervised group exercise programs (tai ji quan, strength training, or stretching control) twice weekly for 6 months and were followed up 6 months after training stopped. The primary outcome was the incidence of falls. Secondary outcomes included fall-related injuries, leg strength (1 repetition maximum; kg), and balance (sensory organization [equilibrium score] and limits of stability [LOS; %] tests).

RESULTS

Four hundred sixty-two women were enrolled (mean age, 62 ± 6.3 years). Retention was 93%, and adherence averaged 72.9%. In primary analysis, there was no difference in the incidence of falls between groups after 6 months of training, nor during 6-month follow-up. A post hoc analysis detected a significantly reduced incidence of fall-related injuries within the tai ji quan group over the first 6 months, dropping from 4.3 falls per 100 person-months (95% CI, 2.9 to 5.6) at baseline to 2.4 falls per person-months (95% CI, 1.2 to 3.5). No significant changes occurred during 6-month follow-up. Over the intervention period, leg strength significantly improved in the strength group and balance (LOS) improved in the tai ji quan group, compared with controls (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

We found no significant reduction in falls for tai ji quan or strength training relative to stretching control in postmenopausal women treated with chemotherapy.

Moderators of exercise effects on self-reported cognitive functioning in cancer survivors: an individual participant data meta-analysis

PURPOSE

This individual participant data meta-analysis (IPD-MA) assesses exercise effects on self-reported cognitive functioning (CF) and investigates whether effects differ by patient-, intervention-, and exercise-related characteristics.

METHODS

IPD from 16 exercise RCTs, including 1987 patients across multiple types of non-metastatic cancer, was pooled. A one-stage IPD-MA using linear mixed-effect models was performed to assess exercise effects on self-reported CF (z-score) and to identify whether the effect was moderated by sociodemographic, clinical, intervention- and exercise-related characteristics, or fatigue, depression, anxiety, and self-reported CF levels at start of the intervention (i.e., baseline). Models were adjusted for baseline CF and included a random intercept at study level to account for clustering of patients within studies. A sensitivity analysis was performed in patients who reported cognitive problems at baseline.

RESULTS

Minimal significant beneficial exercise effects on self-reported CF (β=-0.09 [-0.16; -0.02]) were observed, with slightly larger effects when the intervention was delivered post-treatment (n=745, β=-0.13 [-0.24; -0.02]), and no significant effect during cancer treatment (n=1,162, β=-0.08 [-0.18; 0.02]). Larger effects were observed in interventions of 12 weeks or shorter (β=-0.14 [-0.25; -0.04]) or 24 weeks or longer (β=-0.18 [-0.32; -0.02]), whereas no effects were observed in interventions of 12-24 weeks (β=0.01 [-0.13; 0.15]). Exercise interventions were most beneficial when provided to patients without anxiety symptoms (β=-0.10 [-0.19; -0.02]) or after completion of treatment in patients with cognitive problems (β=-0.19 [-0.31; -0.06]). No other significant moderators were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

This cross-cancer IPD meta-analysis observed small beneficial exercise effects on self-reported CF when the intervention was delivered post-treatment, especially in patients who reported cognitive problems at baseline.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

This study provides some evidence to support the prescription of exercise to improve cognitive functioning. Sufficiently powered trials are warranted to make more definitive recommendations and include these in the exercise guidelines for cancer survivors.

Mat Pilates improves lower and upper body strength and flexibility in breast cancer survivors undergoing hormone therapy: a randomized controlled trial (HAPiMat study)

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effects of 24 weeks of Mat Pilates in breast cancer survivors (BCS) undergoing hormone therapy on lower and upper body muscle strength parameters and flexibility.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-three BCS (≥40 years) with confirmed breast cancer stage 0-III undergoing hormone therapy were included. Participants were randomized into Mat Pilates (three times/week, 60 min session) or control group (relaxation activities every two weeks). The difficulty and number of exercise repetitions were increased over the weeks. Assessments were performed at three times points (baseline, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks). The generalized estimating equations (GEE) model was used to compare each outcome measure during the analysis of intention to treat (ITT) and "Per protocol analysis" (PPA).

RESULTS

The Pilates group presented significantly increased (p < 0.05) isometric flexor-extensor PT, and concentric and eccentric flexor PT and mechanical work (MW) after the intervention. Most of the upper body strength parameters, time to achieve maximal force (TF_max), maximal force (F_max), and rapid force index (RFI) and right-left upper and lower body flexibility (p < 0.05) also improved.

CONCLUSIONS

From our findings, we conclude that 24 and 12-weeks of Mat Pilates induced strength and flexibility gains for lower and upper body, respectively.Implications for rehabilitationMat Pilates can be adapted to the fitness level of breast cancer survivors, with a great variety of exercises that can be performed using a mat only or a few pieces of equipment.Patients can practice at home to gain different health benefits (i.e., increasing strength, flexibility, and functional capacity level), which could positively impact on quality of life.Mat Pilates performed three times per week with systematized increments in exercise level, load, and volume throughout the intervention was effective to improve hip extensor-flexor muscles peak torque and mechanical work at different muscle contractions, as well as upper and lower body flexibility.Mat Pilates was also able to improve right-left shoulder abductor and trunk extensor muscles strength parameters after 12 weeks of intervention, as well as both surgery and non-surgery sides of the upper body.

Pilot trial of physical and cognitive changes related to fall risk in enzalutamide patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC)

e17018

Background: Advanced prostate cancer disproportionally affects older men (age ≥ 75 years). Despite representing only 26% of diagnoses, older men represent half of those diagnosed with metastatic disease and half of all prostate cancer deaths. Treatment options for CRPC include enzalutamide (enza), a competitive inhibitor of the androgen receptor, which shows improved overall survival and other cancer-specific responses in older men. However, enza is also reportedly associated with increased fall frequency of unclear pathophysiology. This pilot study examines strength, balance, and cognition in men before and 12 weeks after starting enza therapy for CRPC. Methods: This prospective single-arm study included men about to begin enza for CRPC, ≥ 65 years, able to ambulate independently. The following tests were administered at baseline and 12 weeks after initiation of enza: Sit-to-stand test (STS), Timed-Up-and-Go test, proprioception assessment, computerized dynamic posturography including sensory organization test (SOT), motor control test (MCT), and limits of stability; Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate, BPI-SF, Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ), and the Godin leisure-time exercise questionnaire (GLTEQ). Falls were assessed with self-report fall diaries and calls from study team to participants over the course of 12 months. Results: Twenty-five participants enrolled. Median age was 75 years. There were 23 (92%) with both baseline and 12-week assessments, and 21 (84%) participants had complete falls data. From baseline to the 12-week follow up, ABC scale scores decreased (median 90.4 to 85.2), GLTEQ scale scores decreased (median 31.4 to 28.0), and time sitting per day from IPAQ increased (4 hours to 5 hours). Of those evaluable for falls, 15 (71%) did not fall during the 12 months and 6 (29%) fell at least once. The fallers and non-fallers did not differ with respect to age or MoCA scores at baseline and on re-assessment. Those who fell performed more poorly on the STS test, the ABC and the dynamic posturography evaluations. Those who fell also had a higher level of activity by GLTEQ. Conclusions: This pilot study does not clearly elucidate the pathophysiology of falls in older men with CRPC taking enza but does provide useful and important guidance for the design of future studies in this area. Baseline and 12-week testing should be repeated at the 24-week time-point to allow for sufficient exposure to enza. To avoid confounding by practice effects, physical tests, particularly dynamic posturography, should be performed at least once prior to baseline assessment. Further research is needed to understand the mechanisms underlying the increased risk of falls previously observed in older men with CPRC taking enza.

A brief whole-body vibration intervention to avoid weight gain in college students: A randomized controlled pilot trial

ObjectiveOver one-third of college students are overweight or obese and rates are rising. Whole body vibration (WBV) training could prevent weight gain but has not been tested in college students. Methods: Randomized controlled trial comparing thrice weekly WBV for 6 months to controls (CON) in undergraduate students. Feasibility included retention, adherence and safety and outcomes included changes in weight, body mass index (BMI) and fat mass. Results: 77 students enrolled in the trial (WBV: n = 40, CON: n = 37), 81% completed the study. Adherence to WBV averaged 59%. Average group differences were 1% body fat (p = 0.049) and 1 kg fat mass (p < 0.01), favoring WBV. Among students completing >80% of prescribed WBV sessions significant group differences widened, while group differences in BMI (p = 0.026) and weight (p = 0.02) change became significant. Conclusions: WBV may be a feasible, safe and effective approach to weight management in college students, though strategies to optimize adherence should continue.

Exercise Recommendation for People With Bone Metastases: Expert Consensus for Health Care Providers and Exercise Professionals

PURPOSE

Exercise has been underutilized in people with advanced or incurable cancer despite the potential to improve physical function and reduce psychosocial morbidity, especially for people with bone metastases because of concerns over skeletal complications. The International Bone Metastases Exercise Working Group (IBMEWG) was formed to develop best practice recommendations for exercise programming for people with bone metastases on the basis of published research, clinical experience, and expert opinion.

METHODS

The IBMEWG undertook sequential steps to inform the recommendations: (1) modified Delphi survey, (2) systematic review, (3) cross-sectional survey to physicians and nurse practitioners, (4) in-person meeting of IBMEWG to review evidence from steps 1-3 to develop draft recommendations, and (5) stakeholder engagement.

RESULTS

Recommendations emerged from the contributing evidence and IBMEWG discussion for pre-exercise screening, exercise testing, exercise prescription, and monitoring of exercise response. Identification of individuals who are potentially at higher risk of exercise-related skeletal complication is a complex interplay of these factors: (1) lesion-related, (2) cancer and cancer treatment-related, and (3) the person-related. Exercise assessment and prescription requires consideration of the location and presentation of bone lesion(s) and should be delivered by qualified exercise professionals with oncology education and exercise prescription experience. Emphasis on postural alignment, controlled movement, and proper technique is essential.

CONCLUSION

Ultimately, the perceived risk of skeletal complications should be weighed against potential health benefits on the basis of consultation between the person, health care team, and exercise professionals. These recommendations provide an initial framework to improve the integration of exercise programming into clinical care for people with bone metastases.

Delivering exercise medicine to cancer survivors: has COVID-19 shifted the landscape for how and who can be reached with supervised group exercise?

PURPOSE

Due to stay-at-home orders during COVID-19, we transitioned supervised, group, in-person resistance training interventions in two clinical trials in cancer survivors to live, online delivery using video-conferencing technology. We describe the feasibility, preliminary efficacy, and safety of live online group training and compare to in-person training.

METHODS

Adherence (% sessions attended), retention (% participants completing intervention), and safety (# adverse events) data of resistance training groups from two randomized controlled trials in cancer survivors that participated before or during the COVID-19 pandemic were collated. Participants were post-treatment breast cancer survivors and their spouses (n = 62) and prostate cancer survivors (n = 32) (age range: 38-82 years). During COVID-19, delivery of supervised, group resistance exercise sessions was delivered live online via video-conference. Preliminary evidence for training efficacy was assessed by chair stand performance over the 6-month intervention.

RESULTS

Feasibility of online resistance training was better than in-person for both studies (adherence: 86% vs 82% and 91% vs. 81% and retention 95% vs. 80% and 92% vs. 84% for online and in-person classes). Improvements in chair stand time were similar in prostate cancer and spouse groups that trained online vs. in-person, except for breast cancer survivors who improved more with in-person training (7% vs. 14% for online vs. in-person). Safety was similar between formats (12 vs. 11 adverse events for online vs. in-person).

CONCLUSION

Supervised, in-person group resistance training can be feasibly adapted for live, online delivery and could help broaden approaches to exercise delivery in cancer survivors, including older adults.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The studies described in this commentary were registered on ClinicalTrials.gov on August 3, 2018 (NCT03630354) and on October 30, 2018 (NCT03741335).

A randomized-controlled trial comparing supervised aerobic training to resistance training followed by unsupervised exercise on physical functioning in older breast cancer survivors

INTRODUCTION

This study compared the relative efficacy of aerobic training to resistance training on physical functioning in older breast cancer survivors and determined whether benefits could be maintained by transitioning to unsupervised home-based training.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Early-stage, post-treatment, older (≥65 years) breast cancer survivors (n = 114; mean age 72 years) were randomized to 12 months of supervised aerobic (n = 37), resistance (n = 39) or stretching (active control; n = 38) training followed by 6 months of unsupervised home-based training. Outcomes included aerobic capacity by 6-min walk distance (6MWD; m), maximal upper and lower body strength (1-repetition maximum; kg); physical function by short physical performance battery (SPPB), SF-36 and Late Life Function and Disability Instruments.

RESULTS

Over 12-months of supervised exercise, all groups improved in muscle strength and SPPB scores, but resistance trained women also improved 6MWD. Improvements in upper and lower body strength in the resistance group were significantly greater than those in the stretching control (+2.5 kg vs. +1.8 kg; p = 0.05) and aerobic groups (+8.3 kg vs +2.7 kg; p = 0.047), respectively, with trends for greater improvements in 6MWD (+57.9 m vs. +22.5 m; p = 0.057) and self-report physical function (+4.8 vs. -4.4; 0.066) in resistance trained women versus controls. Compared to values at 12 months, there were no changes during unsupervised training in any measure within or between groups, except for self-reported advanced lower extremity function which improved in the resistance group and fell in the aerobic group (+1.3 vs. -3.1; p = 0.043).

DISCUSSION

Supervised exercise can improve strength and physical functioning among older breast cancer survivors. Resistance training may lead to better improvements compared to aerobic or flexibility training, whether in a supervised or unsupervised setting. Clinicaltrials.govNCT00662103.

A randomized, controlled trial of group exercise training for fall prevention and functional improvements during and after treatment for prostate cancer

TPS193

Background: Many prostate cancer survivors are treated with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), but these therapies may increase frailty, worsen physical functioning, and increase fall risk. While exercise may counter functional declines associated with ADT, no studies have tested whether and which type of exercise may reduce falls and frailty. The purpose of this trial is to compare the relative efficacy of strength training versus tai ji quan training against each other and to a stretching control group on falls, frailty and physical functioning in men expose to ADT for prostate cancer. Methods: Prostate cancer survivors treated with ADT (n = 360) will be recruited to participate in this single-blind, parallel group, randomized trial. To be eligible men must meet the following criteria: 1) histologically confirmed prostate cancer, 2) received at least 6 months of ADT within the past 10 years, 3) report >1 fall in the past year OR have a score on one of two physical performance tests that is associated with increased fall risk (i.e. ≥ 12.0 seconds to complete the 3 meter timed up and go (TUG), or ≥ 10.0 seconds to complete 5 chair stands), 4) completed any other treatment at least 6 weeks prior to enrollment and not be on any concurrent prostate cancer therapy besides ADT, 5) not currently participating in moderate-vigorous intensity lower-body strength training or tai ji quan training ≥ 2 times/week for ≥ 30 minutes per session, 6) no cognitive difficulties that limit ability to answer survey questions or participate in exercise classes and performance tests, 7) no medical condition, disorder, or take medication that contraindicates participation in moderate intensity exercise, and 8) are able to communicate in English. Participants will be randomized to one of three supervised, group training programs: i) strength training, ii) tai ji quan training, or iii) stretching (control), that train 3x/week for 6 months. Outcomes are assessed at baseline, 3 (mid-intervention), 6 (immediately post-intervention) and 12 (follow-up) months. The primary outcome is falls assessed by monthly self-report. Secondary outcomes include the following: Frailty (low lean body mass (by bioelectrical impedance analysis), exhaustion (by SF-36 vitality scale), low activity (by CHAMPS physical activity survey), slowness (by 4m usual walk speed), and weakness (by chair stand time)); Objective and subjective measures of physical function will also be collected. Negative binomial regression models will be used to assess differences in falls between groups, while mixed-effects modeling will be used to compare the relative efficacy of training group on secondary outcomes. Registered November 18, 2018. Clinical trial information: NCT03741335.

Characteristics of prostate cancer survivors exposed to ADT and enrolled in a fall prevention exercise trial: Comparison of men with confirmed fall history to men with fall risk factors

81

Background: Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for prostate cancer may result in accelerated aging that increases the risk for falls. Falls are higher in men with a history of ADT use, even if treatment is discontinued, compared to men never on ADT. Less is known, however, about the specific patient characteristics that might be associated with falls. Methods: We analyzed data from prostate cancer survivors with a history of ADT and who had enrolled in an ongoing NIH-funded fall prevention exercise trial (NCT03741335). To be eligible for the trial, men were 1) currently or previously treated with ADT and 2) reported a fall in the previous 6 months or had evidence of fall risk. Fall risk was assessed through slow times on a 5 time sit-to-stand test (5XSTS; sec) or timed up and go walk test (TUG; sec). For this analysis we compared men with a positive fall history to men with no recent falls but evidence of fall risk. We compared age, ADT history (past vs current), body mass index (BMI), self-report comorbidities from the Charlson Comorbidity Index, physical function and disability from the LLFDI, pain from the BPI, anxiety from PROMIS, depressive symptoms from the CES-D, fear of falling and activity restrictions from the SAFFE, and physical activity from CHAMPS, as well as objective measures of strength and mobility using 5XSTS and TUG. Results: A total of 171 cases (mean age 73.1 +/- 7.1 years of age) were available for analysis, with 58 men (34%) reporting a fall in the 6 months prior to enrollment. Of reported falls, 11% were injurious falls, with 4% requiring medical attention. Injuries included fractures (n = 4), head injury (n = 2), joint injury (n = 3), and bruises/scrapes (n = 8). Fallers reported significantly lower levels of physical functioning (p < 0.001), greater levels of disability (p < 0.01), greater fear of falling (p < 0.001), more activity restrictions due to falls worry (p < 0.02) and slower TUG times (p < 0.03), than men who had not recently fallen. There were no significant differences between men with established fall history and men with fall risk only on age, ADT history, comorbidities, BMI, pain, anxiety, depressive symptoms, physical activity, or 5XSTS (p for all > 0.05). Conclusions: Among our preliminary sample of men with a history of ADT use and enrolled in an ongoing fall prevention trial, men with an established fall history functioned less independently, were more worried about falls and apt to restrict their activities accordingly, and had poorer mobility than men who hadn’t recently fallen. From our cross-sectional design we cannot determine whether poorer functioning and mobility and greater fear of falling were antecedents or consequences of a recent fall. Regardless, interventions designed to prevent falls in men exposed to ADT are critical to prevent potential injurious falls and to keep men functioning independently.

Remote administration of physical performance tests among persons with and without a cancer history: Establishing reliability and agreement with in-person assessment

OBJECTIVES

To assess the reliability of using videoconference technology to remotely administer the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), including the 5-time sit-to-stand (5XSTS) and usual 4-m walk (4mWT), and the Timed Up and Go (TUG) tests and agreement with in-person administration among adults with and without cancer.

METHODS

Participants from two ongoing clinical exercise trials in cancer survivors, one that included partners without cancer, comprised the available sample (n = 176; mean age 62.5 ± 11.5 years.). Remote tests were administered on two separate days by either the same or a different assessor to determine intra-rater and inter-rater reliability, respectively. We also compared tests conducted remotely and in-person using the same assessor and the same participant. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were used for all comparisons, except for the SPPB score, which used Cohen's kappa and Krippendorf's alpha for intra- and inter-rater reliability, respectively.

RESULTS

Remote assessment of the TUG test had excellent intra-rater reliability (0.98, 95% CI 0.93-0.99), inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.96, 95% CI 0.90-0.99), and good agreement with in-person tests (ICC = 0.88, 95% CI 0.74-0.94). The 5XSTS and 4mWT showed excellent (ICC = 0.92, 95% CI 0.84-0.96) and good (ICC = 0.87, 95% CI 0.71-0.94) intra-rater reliability, respectively, but somewhat lower inter-rater reliability (5XSTS: ICC = 0.65, 95% CI 0.34-0.83 and 4mWT: ICC = 0.62, 95% CI 0.30-0.81). Remote 5XSTS had moderate agreement (ICC = 0.72, 95% CI 0.62-0.80) and 4mWT had poor agreement (ICC = 0.48, 95% CI -0.07-0.76) with in-person tests.

CONCLUSIONS

Remote assessment of common physical function tests in older adults, including those who have cancer, is feasible and highly reliable when using the same assessor. TUG may be the most methodologically robust measure for remote assessment because it is also highly reliable when using different assessors and correlates strongly with in-person testing. Adapting administration of objective measures of physical function for the remote environment could significantly expand the reach of research and clinical practice to assess populations at risk of functional decline.

Quality of Life of Prostate Cancer Survivors Participating in a Remotely Delivered Web-Based Behavioral Intervention Pilot Randomized Trial

Background:

Following a prostate cancer (PC) diagnosis, treatment-related symptoms may result in diminished quality of life (QoL). Improved diet and increased exercise may improve QoL in men with PC.

Methods:

We conducted a 4-arm pilot randomized trial to assess feasibility and acceptability of a 3-month web-based diet and exercise intervention, among men (>18 years of age) with PC (reported elsewhere). The purpose of this study is to describe the change in QoL measured by surveys (eg, QLQ-C30, PROMIS Fatigue) at enrollment and following the intervention. Men were randomized 1:1:1:1 to increasing levels of web-based behavioral support: Level 1: website; Level 2: Level 1 plus personalized diet and exercise prescription; Level 3: Levels 1-2 plus Fitbit and text messages; Level 4: Levels 1-3 plus 2 30-minute coaching calls. T-tests were used to compare pre-post change in mean QoL scores between each Level and Level 1.

Results:

Two hundred and two men consented and were randomized (n = 49, 51, 50, 52 for Levels 1-4, respectively). Men were predominantly white (93%), with a median age of 70 years (Intra-quartile Range [IQR]: 65,75) and 3 years (IQR: 1,9) post primary treatment for mostly localized disease (74% with T1-2). There were no meaningful changes in QoL, but there were notable trends. Level 3 participants had small improvements in QLQ-C30 Global Health (5.46; 95% CI: −0.02, 10.95) compared to Level 1. In contrast, Level 2 participants trended toward decreasing Global QoL (−2.31, 95% CI: −8.05, 3.42), which may reflect declines in function (eg, Cognitive: −6.94, 95% CI: −13.76, −0.13) and higher symptom burden (eg, Diarrhea: 4.63, 95% CI: −1.48, 10.74).

Conclusions:

This short, web-based intervention did not appear to have an impact on PC survivors’ QoL. Most men were several years past treatment for localized disease; the potential for this approach to reduce symptoms and improve QoL in men who have worse health may still be warranted.

A pilot feasibility study of Exercising Together© during radiation therapy for prostate cancer: a dyadic approach for patients and spouses

Introduction

Prostate cancer can negatively impact the health of patients and their spouse, particularly early on in the cancer trajectory.

Purpose

To determine the feasibility and acceptability of dyadic exercises during radiation therapy and preliminary efficacy on physical, mental, and relational outcomes for men and their spouses. Exercising Together©, originally designed as a 6-month dyadic resistance training program for couples post-treatment, was adapted for the radiation setting.

Methods

We conducted a single-group pilot feasibility study of Exercising Together© in men scheduled for radiation therapy for prostate cancer and their spouse. Couples attended supervised exercise sessions thrice weekly throughout radiation treatment and were followed up 8 weeks later. Primary outcomes were feasibility and acceptability with secondary outcomes of changes in physical (physical functioning (short physical performance battery (sPPB)), gait speed (m/s), functional capacity (400-m walk (min), physical activity (min/week)), mental (depressive symptoms (CES-D), and anxiety (SCL-90 ANX)), and relationship (Dyadic Coping, Role Overload, and Physical Intimacy Behavior Scales) health outcomes for each partner. Participants completed an evaluation post-intervention.

Results

Ten couples enrolled and 8 completed the intervention, attending 83% of scheduled sessions. Couple satisfaction with the intervention was high (patients: mean difference (MD) = 9.4 ± 1.9 and spouses: MD = 10.0 ± 0.0, on a 1–10 scale). At post-intervention, gait speed (MD = 0.1; 95%CI: 0.1, 0.2; p = 0.003; d = 0.94) and functional capacity (MD = −0.6; 95%CI: −0.9, 0.3; p = 0.002; d = −0.42) improved in patients and sPPB in spouses (MD = 1.3; 95%CI: 0.3, 2.2; p = 0.02; d = 0.71). Total physical activity increased non-significantly for patients and significantly for spouses at post-intervention and decreased at follow-up (MD = 179.6; 95%CI: 55.4, 303.7; p = 0.01; d = 1.35 and MD = −139.9; 95%CI: −266.5, 13.3; p = 0.03; d=1.06). Among patients, anxiety and active engagement significantly improved post-intervention (MD = −2.3; 95%CI: −3.8, 0.7; p = 0.01; d = −0.43 and MD = 2.5; 95%CI: 0.7, 4.3; p = 0.01; d = 0.98, respectively). There were modest effects on other physical, mental, and relationship health domains in patients and spouses.

Conclusion

A modified version of Exercising Together© is a feasible and acceptable program during radiation therapy for prostate cancer and shows preliminary evidence for improvements on physical, mental, and relational health in both patient and spouse. A larger, fully powered randomized controlled trial is warranted and could help shift the landscape toward dyadically targeted interventions.

Trial registration

This study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov on February 18th, 2018 (NCT03418025).

Protocol for GET FIT Prostate: a randomized, controlled trial of group exercise training for fall prevention and functional improvements during and after treatment for prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Many prostate cancer survivors are treated with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), but these therapies may increase frailty, worsen physical functioning, and increase fall risk. While exercise may counter functional declines associated with ADT, no studies have tested whether and which type of exercise may reduce falls and frailty. The purpose of this trial is to compare the relative efficacy of strength training versus tai ji quan training against each other and to a stretching control group on falls, frailty, and physical functioning in men expose to ADT for prostate cancer.

METHODS

Prostate cancer survivors treated with ADT (N = 360) who have fallen in the past year or are at risk of a fall based on validated risk factors will be recruited to participate in this single-blind, parallel group, randomized trial. Participants will be randomized to one of three supervised, group training programs: (i) strength training, (ii) tai ji quan training, or (iii) stretching (control), that train 3×/week for 6 months. Outcomes are assessed at baseline, 3 (mid-intervention), 6 (immediately post-intervention), and 12 (follow-up) months. The primary outcome is falls assessed by monthly self-report. Secondary outcomes include the following: frailty (low lean body mass (by bioelectrical impedance analysis), exhaustion (by SF-36 vitality scale), low activity (by CHAMPS physical activity survey), slowness (by 4 m usual walk speed), and weakness (by chair stand time)); objective and subjective measures of physical function will also be collected. Negative binomial regression models will be used to assess differences in falls between groups, while mixed effects modeling will be used to compare the relative efficacy of training group on secondary outcomes.

DISCUSSION

Exercise represents a non-pharmacologic approach to mitigate the problem of falls experienced among men treated with ADT. By engaging in appropriate exercise, men may be able to avoid or delay falls, frailty, and disability associated with their cancer treatment. Findings of the trial are expected to inform clinical practice about how exercise could be prescribed as part of cancer care for prostate cancer survivors prescribed ADT.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03741335 . Registered on November 18, 2018.

Study protocol for the Exercising Together© trial: a randomized, controlled trial of partnered exercise for couples coping with cancer

BACKGROUND

Most cancer survivors are married, and cancer strains the physical and mental health of each partner and their intimate relationship. We created a partnered strength training program, Exercising Together©, where the survivor and his/her partner exercise as a team in order to improve physical and mental health of both members of the couple as well as the quality of their relationship. We have not yet determined if Exercising Together© is similarly effective in couples coping with different types of cancer nor if training as a team has unique and added benefits over those derived from supervised group training and/or shared behavior change. The purpose of this study is to determine the unique benefits of Exercising Together© on physical, mental, and relational health in couples coping with breast, prostate, or colorectal cancer.

METHODS

Survivors of prostate, breast and colorectal cancer (N = 294, 98 per cancer site) and their intimate, co-residing partners are recruited to participate in a single-blind, parallel group, randomized trial comparing three exercise groups that train twice per week for 6 months. Couples are randomized to one of three groups: (1) Exercising Together© where partners train as a team in a supervised group setting; (2) separate supervised group exercise classes for survivors or partners, respectively; (3) unsupervised home exercise program provided to each partner. The primary outcome is relationship quality (dyadic coping by the Dyadic Coping scale, emotional intimacy by the Dyadic Adjustment Scale, physical intimacy by the Physical Intimacy Behavior Scale, and symptom incongruence). Secondary outcomes are physical health (% body fat by DXA, serum fasting lipids (triglycerides, HDL, and LDL cholesterol), insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), resting blood pressure, C-reactive protein, TNF alpha, and physical functioning by the short Physical Performance Battery and SF-36) and mental health (depressive symptoms, anxiety, fear of recurrence) of each partner. Outcomes are collected at baseline, mid (3 months), post-intervention (6 months), and follow-up (12 months).

DISCUSSION

Exercising Together© could shift the paradigm of survivorship care toward novel couple-based approaches that could optimize outcomes for each partner because their health is interdependent on each other and their relationship.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03630354 . Registered August 14, 2018.

Exercise for individuals with bone metastases: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Exercise has the potential to improve physical function and quality of life in individuals with bone metastases but is often avoided due to safety concerns. This systematic review summarizes the safety, feasibility and efficacy of exercise in controlled trials that include individuals with bone metastases.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, Pubmed, CINAHL, PEDro and CENTRAL databases were searched up to July 16, 2020.

RESULTS

A total of 17 trials were included incorporating aerobic exercise, resistance exercise or soccer interventions. Few (n = 4, 0.5%) serious adverse events were attributed to exercise participation, with none related to bone metastases. Mixed efficacy results were found, with exercise eliciting positive changes or no change. The majority of trials included an element of supervised exercise instruction (n = 16, 94%) and were delivered by qualified exercise professionals (n = 13, 76%).

CONCLUSIONS

Exercise appears safe and feasible for individuals with bone metastases when it includes an element of supervised exercise instruction.

Continuous unobtrusive assessment of meaningful change in older adults with cancer: The Pacific Aging & Cancer Study Collaborative—PACS collaborative

1569

Background: Knowledge of changes in health that precede a cancer diagnosis is challenging because of a lack of longitudinal, objective measurement techniques. Current approaches rely on periodic assessment via self-report which may miss when and how health changes, particularly when changes may appear subtly over time. Remote-monitoring technologies provide a mechanism to continuously, passively, and unobtrusively monitor changes in health so that trajectories of change in relation to a life event (i.e., cancer diagnosis, treatment) can be detected and described. We examined the changes in digital indicators of health and life events 1 year before and after a self-reported cancer diagnosis in community-dwelling adults aged 65 and older. Methods: This is a secondary, retrospective data analysis of older adults who self-reported a new cancer diagnosis in the Oregon Center for Aging & Technology (ORCATECH) cohort. Ten older adults (age = 71.8±4.9 years, 30% women) were included with various cancer types (esophageal, prostate, uterine, pancreatic, b-cell follicular lymphoma, multiple myeloma, basal cell melanoma, basal and/or squamous cell carcinoma). Daily physical activity was measured using step counts derived from an actigraph watch. Weekly health and life events (pain severity, loneliness, hospitalization/emergency room (ER) visits, days away from home overnight) were self-reported from weekly online surveys. Results: A total of 3,624 days of actigraphy data (210 ± 88 days pre-cancer; 153 ± 81 days post-cancer) and 750 weeks of self-reported online survey data (36 ± 12 weeks pre-cancer; 39 ± 14 weeks post-cancer) were collected. Longitudinal linear mixed-effects models revealed that the trajectory of step counts was different pre- and post-cancer (β = -1.52, p <.001), with a gradual decrease in step counts before a cancer diagnosis. The trajectory of pain severity was different pre- and post-cancer (β = 0.01, p <.001), with a gradual increase in pain severity before a cancer diagnosis. There was a gradual increase in the occurrence of hospitalization/ER visits (OR = 1.07, p = 0.02) and days away from home overnight (OR = 1.04, p = 0.01) before a cancer diagnosis. Feelings of loneliness increased over time, regardless of pre- or post-cancer (OR = 1.04, p <.001). Conclusions: Changes in health and life events 1-year before a cancer diagnosis in older adults with varying cancer types and severity were unobtrusively observed. This study suggests that a remote-monitoring technology platform deployed in homes can detect meaningful intra-individual changes before and after a cancer diagnosis. Future studies can employ this technology as a pathway for improving the timeliness of detection and more effective therapeutic follow-up for older adults.

The GET FIT trial (NCT01635413): A randomized controlled trial of strength training versus Tai Ji Quan for fall prevention among female cancer survivors

12059

Background: Women with cancer are significantly more likely to fall than women without cancer but there are not yet any evidence-based fall prevention strategies that specifically target cancer survivors. The GET FIT trial compares the efficacy of two distinct types of exercise, strength training vs. tai ji quan, to prevent falls in women finished with chemotherapy. Methods: We conducted a 3 group, single-blind, parallel design, randomized controlled trial in older, inactive women cancer survivors treated with chemotherapy. Women were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 intervention groups: 1) strength training, 2) tai ji quan or 3) a placebo control group (stretching) that trained 2x/week for 6 months. Additional follow-up occurred 6 months after formal training stopped. The primary outcome was fall rate across 6-and 12 months; secondary outcomes, reflective of training fidelity, were maximal leg strength (by 1-repetition maximum) and dynamic postural control (by computerized dynamic posturography), collected at 0, 3, and 6 months. Results: 442 women (mean age 62.4 + 6.3 yrs.) were enrolled and randomly assigned to study groups. Over the 6 months prior to enrollment, 21% of the sample (n = 94) reported at least one fall (of which, 37% (n = 35) reported two or more falls)), and 12% (n = 51) reported at least one injurious fall. Retention across the 12 months study period was 88%, while adherence to the study interventions over 6 months averaged 73%, 71%, and 74% for the strength, tai ji quan and stretching (control) groups, respectively. 26% of the sample (n = 99 of 382) reported at least one fall during the intervention and 27% (n = 102) reported falls during follow up. Using regression models, there were no significant differences in the odds of having at least one fall during the intervention period (1-6 months) or across the entire follow-up period (1-12 months) between the control and either the strength or tai ji quan groups. At 6 months, the strength group showed a greater increase from baseline in maximal leg strength (+14.3 kg, 95% CI: 11.4-17.1) than the control group (+7.5 kg, 95% CI: 4.6-10.4, p = 0.002). Whereas, the tai ji quan group showed a greater increase in dynamic postural control (+2.42%, 95% CI: 1.36-3.48) compared to the control group (+0.35%, 95% CI: -0.69-1.38, p = 0.007). Conclusions: Despite evidence for fidelity of strength and tai ji quan training to improve muscle strength and postural control, respectively, neither program significantly lowered fall rates over a placebo control group. It is possible that the dose of exercise was too low and/or the sample was not at high risk of falls. The etiology of fall risk in women cancer survivors needs to be better understood as it may differ from risk factors in older adults. Future trials should consider patient-centered, tailored fall-prevention interventions for cancer survivors based on identified fall risk factors. Clinical trial information: NCT01635413.

Predictors of falls after starting an exercise program: A secondary analysis in inactive, female cancer survivors participating in the GET FIT trial

12075

Background: Women treated for cancer are more likely to fall than women without a cancer history. Exercise is a fall prevention strategy for older adults that we are testing in the GET FIT trial as a fall prevention approach in women cancer survivors. Increasing physical activity, though, could acutely increase the risk of falls in inactive survivors with known fall risk related to treatment. Knowing who might be at risk prior to beginning an exercise program would inform additional safety precautions during exercise. Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of baseline data from the GET FIT trial that enrolled inactive, older women who had completed chemotherapy for cancer. Women completed objective (muscle strength, static postural control, range of motion, physical functioning) and self-report (fall history, comorbidities, presence of neuropathy symptoms, pain severity, depressive symptoms, cognitive functioning, perceptions of lower extremity functioning, disability, fear of falling, demographic, and clinical characteristics) measures at baseline. Falls were prospectively collected during the 6 month intervention using monthly self report. Potential predictors of falls were included if univariate tests revealed significant differences between fallers and non-fallers. To identify the strongest predictors of falls, we used an automated model selection and multimodel inference approach to perform an exhaustive model search. Results: Baseline data were available for 415 participants with known faller status at the end of the intervention, of whom 31.3% (n = 130) reported at least one fall. The average age of the sample was 62.1±6.4 years and consisted mostly of non-Hispanic white, married, highly educated, overweight or obese women treated for breast cancer. Fallers (1+ falls) and non-fallers significantly differed on measures of fall history, comorbidities, pain, neuropathy, fear of falling, disability, perceived lower extremity functioning, cognitive functioning, depression, and postural control. The best model of faller status (per BIC) included postural control (p = 0.004), perceived lower extremity functioning (p = 0.072), and fear of falling (p = 0.030). Odds of ≥1 fall during the intervention increased by 1.72 (95% CI: 1.05-2.83) times for a 0.1-point decrease in postural control, 1.11 (1.04-1.19) times for a 0.1-point increase in fear of falling, and 1.02 (1.00-1.03) times for a 1-point decrease in perceived lower extremity functioning. Conclusions: Women cancer survivors with poor balance, poor self-rated functioning, and a fear of falling may need to take additional fall precautions when starting an exercise program. Clinical trial information: NCT01635413.

"It was just for us": qualitative evaluation of an exercise intervention for African-American couples

Background

Promoting long-term exercise adherence should be a key focus for health and fitness professionals working to reduce obesity and cardiometabolic health disparities, and all-cause mortality in inactive African-American (AA) adults. Data have suggested that romantic partners can improve long-term exercise adherence and that this dyadic approach should be examined in exercise interventions. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to conduct a qualitative evaluation of a pilot exercise intervention conducted in older AA couples.

Methods

Two semi-structured focus groups were utilized to compare participants’ perceptions of and experiences during the pilot intervention across two randomly assigned treatment conditions (exercising together with partner [ET; n = 8] versus exercising separately [ES: n = 6]). Participants (mean age: 64.7 ± 6.8 years) of a previous 12-week pilot exercise intervention (walking ≥3 days/week, 30 min/day plus supervised resistance training 2 days/week) were interviewed. Verbatim transcripts were coded using an open coding approach.

Results

Three key themes (intervention value/benefits, intervention difficulties, and suggested improvements) emerged. Although all couples identified health and relationship benefits of the intervention, some differences surfaced within themes across the two intervention groups.

Conclusions

Overall, these qualitative data suggest that couples had a positive experience while participating in the pilot study. In addition, key learning points to improve the intervention were identified including a more gradual transition to independent exercise, more flexibility training, and the incorporation of tangential education. These data will help investigators continue to develop the intervention, which is ultimately designed to promote long-term exercise adherence to reduce cardiometabolic health disparities in the AA community.

Feasibility and Acceptability of a Remotely Delivered, Web-Based Behavioral Intervention for Men With Prostate Cancer: Four-Arm Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial

Background

Diet and exercise may be associated with quality of life and survival in men with prostate cancer.

Objective

This study aimed to determine the feasibility and acceptability of a remotely delivered web-based behavioral intervention among men with prostate cancer.

Methods

We conducted a multi-site 4-arm pilot randomized controlled trial of a 3-month intervention (TrueNTH Community of Wellness). Eligibility included self-reported prostate cancer diagnosis, having a personal device that connected to the internet, age ≥18 years, and ability to read English and receive text messages and emails. Men receiving chemotherapy or radiation, or those who reported contraindications to exercise, could participate with physician clearance. Participants were randomized (1:1:1:1) to additive intervention levels: website; website and personalized diet and exercise prescription; website, personalized prescription, Fitbit, and text messages; and website, personalized prescription, Fitbit, text messages, and 2 30-minute phone calls—one with an exercise trainer and one with a registered dietician. Primary outcomes were feasibility (accrual and attrition) and acceptability (survey data and website use). We described self-reported diet and exercise behavior at the time of enrollment, 3 months, and 6 months as secondary outcomes.

Results

In total, 202 men consented and were randomized between August 2017 and September 2018 (level 1: 49, level 2: 51, level 3: 50, level 4: 52). A total of 160 men completed the onboarding process and were exposed to their randomly assigned intervention (38, 38, 42, and 42 in levels 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively). The follow-up rate was 82.7% (167/202) at 3 months and 77.2% (156/202) at 6 months. Participants had a median age of 70 years and were primarily White and college educated. Website visit frequency over the 3-month intervention period increased across levels (median: 2, 9, 11, and 16 visits for levels 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively). Most were satisfied or very satisfied with the intervention (20/39, 51%; 27/42, 64%; 23/44, 52%; and 27/42, 64% for levels 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively). The percentage of men who reported being very satisfied was highest among level 4 participants (10/42, 24% vs 4/39, 10%; 5/42, 12%; and 5/44, 11% for levels 1, 2, and 3, respectively). Dissatisfaction was highest in level 1 (5/39, 13% vs 1/42, 2%; 3/44, 7%; and 2/42, 5% for levels 2, 3, and 4, respectively). We observed small improvements in diet and physical activity at 3 months among men in level 4 versus those in level 1.

Conclusions

A web-based, remotely delivered, tailored behavioral intervention for men with prostate cancer is feasible. Future studies are warranted to increase the effect of the intervention on patient behavior while maintaining sustainability and scalability as well as to design and implement interventions for more diverse populations.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03406013; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03406013

Web-Based Lifestyle Interventions for Prostate Cancer Survivors: Qualitative Study

Background

Exercise and a healthy diet can improve the quality of life and prognosis of prostate cancer survivors, but there have been limited studies on the feasibility of web-based lifestyle interventions in this population.

Objective

This study aims to develop a data-driven grounded theory of web-based engagement by prostate cancer survivors based on their experience in the Community of Wellness, a 12-week randomized clinical trial designed to support healthy diet and exercise habits.

Methods

TrueNTH’s Community of Wellness was a four-arm pilot study of men with prostate cancer (N=202) who received progressive levels of behavioral support (level 1: website; level 2: website with individualized diet and exercise recommendations; level 3: website with individualized diet and exercise recommendations, Fitbit, and text messages; and level 4: website with individualized diet and exercise recommendations, Fitbit and text messages, and separate phone calls with an exercise trainer and a registered dietitian). The primary aim of the study is to determine the feasibility and estimate the effects on behaviors (results reported in a separate paper). Following the 12-week intervention, we invited participants to participate in 4 focus groups, one for each intervention level. In this report, we used grounded theory analyses including open, axial, and selective coding to generate codes and themes from the focus group transcripts. Categories were refined across levels using embodied categorization and constant comparative methods.

Results

In total, 20 men with prostate cancer participated in the focus groups: 5, 4, 5, and 6 men in levels 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. Participants converged on 5 common factors influencing engagement with the intervention: environment (home environment, competing priorities, and other lifestyle programs), motivation (accountability and discordance experienced within the health care system), preparedness (technology literacy, health literacy, trust, and readiness to change), program design (communication, materials, and customization), and program support (education, ally, and community). Each of these factors influenced the survivors’ long-term impressions and habits. We proposed a grounded theory associating these constructs to describe the components contributing to the intuitiveness of a web-based lifestyle intervention.

Conclusions

These analyses suggest that web-based lifestyle interventions are more intuitive when we optimize participants’ technology and health literacy; tailor interface design, content, and feedback; and leverage key motivators (ie, health care providers, family members, web-based coach) and environmental factors (ie, familiarity with other lifestyle programs). Together, these grounded theory–based efforts may improve engagement with web-based interventions designed to support prostate cancer survivorship.

Moderators of Exercise Effects on Cancer-related Fatigue: A Meta-analysis of Individual Patient Data

PURPOSE

Fatigue is a common and potentially disabling symptom in patients with cancer. It can often be effectively reduced by exercise. Yet, effects of exercise interventions might differ across subgroups. We conducted a meta-analysis using individual patient data of randomized controlled trials (RCT) to investigate moderators of exercise intervention effects on cancer-related fatigue.

METHODS

We used individual patient data from 31 exercise RCT worldwide, representing 4366 patients, of whom 3846 had complete fatigue data. We performed a one-step individual patient data meta-analysis, using linear mixed-effect models to analyze the effects of exercise interventions on fatigue (z score) and to identify demographic, clinical, intervention- and exercise-related moderators. Models were adjusted for baseline fatigue and included a random intercept on study level to account for clustering of patients within studies. We identified potential moderators by testing their interaction with group allocation, using a likelihood ratio test.

RESULTS

Exercise interventions had statistically significant beneficial effects on fatigue (β = -0.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.22 to -0.12). There was no evidence of moderation by demographic or clinical characteristics. Supervised exercise interventions had significantly larger effects on fatigue than unsupervised exercise interventions (βdifference = -0.18; 95% CI -0.28 to -0.08). Supervised interventions with a duration ≤12 wk showed larger effects on fatigue (β = -0.29; 95% CI, -0.39 to -0.20) than supervised interventions with a longer duration.

CONCLUSIONS

In this individual patient data meta-analysis, we found statistically significant beneficial effects of exercise interventions on fatigue, irrespective of demographic and clinical characteristics. These findings support a role for exercise, preferably supervised exercise interventions, in clinical practice. Reasons for differential effects in duration require further exploration.

Exercise Guidelines for Cancer Survivors: Consensus Statement from International Multidisciplinary Roundtable

PURPOSE

The number of cancer survivors worldwide is growing, with over 15.5 million cancer survivors in the United States alone-a figure expected to double in the coming decades. Cancer survivors face unique health challenges as a result of their cancer diagnosis and the impact of treatments on their physical and mental well-being. For example, cancer survivors often experience declines in physical functioning and quality of life while facing an increased risk of cancer recurrence and all-cause mortality compared with persons without cancer. The 2010 American College of Sports Medicine Roundtable was among the first reports to conclude that cancer survivors could safely engage in enough exercise training to improve physical fitness and restore physical functioning, enhance quality of life, and mitigate cancer-related fatigue.

METHODS

A second Roundtable was convened in 2018 to advance exercise recommendations beyond public health guidelines and toward prescriptive programs specific to cancer type, treatments, and/or outcomes.

RESULTS

Overall findings retained the conclusions that exercise training and testing were generally safe for cancer survivors and that every survivor should "avoid inactivity." Enough evidence was available to conclude that specific doses of aerobic, combined aerobic plus resistance training, and/or resistance training could improve common cancer-related health outcomes, including anxiety, depressive symptoms, fatigue, physical functioning, and health-related quality of life. Implications for other outcomes, such as peripheral neuropathy and cognitive functioning, remain uncertain.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed recommendations should serve as a guide for the fitness and health care professional working with cancer survivors. More research is needed to fill remaining gaps in knowledge to better serve cancer survivors, as well as fitness and health care professionals, to improve clinical practice.

Feasibility and acceptability of yoga to improve psychosocial and physical function among patients with lung cancer: A pilot study

e24068

Background: Patients with lung cancer suffer from depression symptoms, reduced quality of life (QOL), and declines in physical function during and after cancer treatment. Since yoga is a low energy demand form of exercise, we hypothesized that yoga is a feasible, safe, and efficacious strategy to mitigate these problems in lung cancer patients. Purpose: 1) Determine the feasibility, acceptability, and safety of a yoga program in patients (pts) with lung cancer during or soon after cancer treatment; 2) Determine the preliminary efficacy of yoga to improve depressive symptoms, quality of life, and physical function among pts with lung cancer. Methods: This study was a single group 12-week (wk) pilot trial of low-moderate intensity yoga among pts with stages I-IV lung cancer (n = 20) during (n = 14) or after (n = 6) cancer treatment. Assessments conducted at baseline, 6- and 12-wks included the Patient Health Questionnaire-8, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Lung (FACT-L), 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), hand grip strength, chair stand time, and flexibility (back scratch and sit-reach) tests. Results: At baseline, 20 pts, including those with metastatic disease (n = 8), enrolled and 7 pts (35%) withdrew by 6-wks due to poor/worsening health. No further withdrawals occurred at 12-wks. Among pts (n = 13) who completed the study, adherence to the intervention was 75% and 78% at 6 and 12-wks, respectively. No moderate or serious adverse events were reported. Over 12 wks, depressive symptoms (average = -1.8 ±1.23, 43.9% change) decreased, improvements in QOL improved (average = +4 ±2.9, 6.5% change),6MWD (average = +22.6m ±15.9, 6.5% change), hand grip strength (average = +1.6kg ±1.2, 5.7% change), chair stand time (average = -3sec ±2.1, 5.8% change), and upper (average = -10.8cm ±7.5, 49.4% change) and lower (average = -11.9cm ±8.4, 74.6% change) body flexibility occurred. Conclusions: In this sample of lung cancer pts, a 12-week yoga program was modestly feasible, was shown to be safe and potentially beneficial for psychosocial and physical function. Though retention was lower than expected due to early pt withdrawal for poor health, adherence to supervised practice among those pts who were able to complete the intervention exceeded the target goal. Among pts with stage I-IV lung cancer yoga may be a useful strategy to improve psychosocial outcomes and physical functioning, though alternate delivery approaches for pts with advanced disease deserves further exploration. Clinical trial information: NCT03649737 .

DaroACT: Darolutamide and enzalutamide effects on physical and neurocognitive function and daily activity in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC)

TPS5587

Background: The androgen receptor inhibitors (ARIs) apalutamide and enzalutamide (Enza) are approved for the treatment of men with advanced prostate cancer. These ARIs are associated with adverse events (AEs) including fatigue, neurocognitive dysfunction, and falls. Darolutamide (Daro) is a structurally distinct ARI approved by the FDA to treat nonmetastatic CRPC, based on significantly improved metastasis-free survival vs placebo in the ARAMIS Phase III clinical trial. Daro was not associated with a significant increase in AEs beyond that of concomitant androgen deprivation therapy, compared with placebo. DaroAcT is the first prospective trial to compare the effects of Daro to those of Enza on physical and neurocognitive function, and daily physical activity, in men with CRPC. Methods: This randomized, open-label, multicenter, Phase IIb trial (NCT04157088), involving ~20 sites across the US, is open for enrollment. After a lead-in phase of 30 pts treated with Daro alone, approximately 120 pts will be randomized 1:1 to receive Daro (600 mg twice daily) or Enza (160 mg once daily). Eligibility criteria include CRPC (metastatic and non-metastatic); age ≥18 years; Karnofsky performance status ≥80; no prior abiraterone within 6 months of enrollment, and no prior immunotherapy or apalutamide. All patients will continue luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist or antagonist treatment for the duration of the study. The primary endpoint is the proportion of pts with slowed Timed Up and Go (TUG) time during the 24-week period from baseline. Secondary endpoints include the proportion of pts with worsening in short Physical Performance Battery (sPPB), mean change from baseline in daily physical activity, the proportion of pts with a decline in neurocognitive function or worsening of fatigue, and AEs. This study uses objective measures to assess physical function, including TUG and sPPB, measurements of daily activity levels with an accelerometry device for ≥7 days at designated time points, and neurocognitive tests. Fatigue is measured using the Brief Fatigue Inventory. Primary completion is estimated to be December 31, 2022. Clinical trial information: NCT04157088 .

Exercise is medicine in oncology: Engaging clinicians to help patients move through cancer

Multiple organizations around the world have issued evidence-based exercise guidance for patients with cancer and cancer survivors. Recently, the American College of Sports Medicine has updated its exercise guidance for cancer prevention as well as for the prevention and treatment of a variety of cancer health-related outcomes (eg, fatigue, anxiety, depression, function, and quality of life). Despite these guidelines, the majority of people living with and beyond cancer are not regularly physically active. Among the reasons for this is a lack of clarity on the part of those who work in oncology clinical settings of their role in assessing, advising, and referring patients to exercise. The authors propose using the American College of Sports Medicine's Exercise Is Medicine initiative to address this practice gap. The simple proposal is for clinicians to assess, advise, and refer patients to either home-based or community-based exercise or for further evaluation and intervention in outpatient rehabilitation. To do this will require care coordination with appropriate professionals as well as change in the behaviors of clinicians, patients, and those who deliver the rehabilitation and exercise programming. Behavior change is one of many challenges to enacting the proposed practice changes. Other implementation challenges include capacity for triage and referral, the need for a program registry, costs and compensation, and workforce development. In conclusion, there is a call to action for key stakeholders to create the infrastructure and cultural adaptations needed so that all people living with and beyond cancer can be as active as is possible for them.

Effects and moderators of exercise on sleep in adults with cancer: Individual patient data and aggregated meta-analyses

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effects of exercise interventions on sleep disturbances and sleep quality in patients with mixed cancer diagnoses, and identify demographic, clinical, and intervention-related moderators of these effects.

METHODS

Individual patient data (IPD) and aggregated meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Using data from the Predicting OptimaL cAncer RehabIlitation and Supportive care project, IPD of 2173 adults (mean age = 54.8) with cancer from 17 RCTs were analyzed. A complementary systematic search was conducted (until November 2018) to study the overall effects and test the representativeness of analyzed IPD. Effect sizes of exercise effects on self-reported sleep outcomes were calculated for all included RCTs. Linear mixed-effect models were used to evaluate the effects of exercise on post-intervention outcome values, adjusting for baseline values. Moderator effects were studied by testing interactions for demographic, clinical and intervention-related characteristics.

RESULTS

For all 27 eligible RCTs from the updated search, exercise interventions significantly decreased sleep disturbances in adults with cancer (g = -0.09, 95% CI [-0.16; -0.02]). No significant effect was obtained for sleep quality. RCTs included in IPD analyses constituted a representative sample of the published literature. The intervention effects on sleep disturbances were not significantly moderated by any demographic, clinical, or intervention-related factor, nor by sleep disturbances.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis provides some evidence that, compared to control conditions, exercise interventions may improve sleep disturbances, but not sleep quality, in cancer patients, although this effect is of a small magnitude. Among the investigated variables, none was found to significantly moderate the effect of exercise interventions on sleep disturbances.

Catalyzing Research to Optimize Cancer Survivors' Participation in Work and Life Roles

Participation refers to a state of health in which a person is able to fully engage in roles and life situations. Adults living with and beyond cancer often report persistent participation restrictions that affect their productivity and quality of life. The American Occupational Therapy Foundation convened a group of scientists from seven different disciplines in a Planning Grant Collective (PGC) to stimulate research to identify scalable ways to preserve and optimize participation among cancer survivors. Participants identified challenges, prioritized solutions, and generated novel research questions that move beyond symptom and impairment mitigation as outcomes to identify interventions that improve participation in roles and life situations. This article summarizes the PGC discussion and recommendations regarding three challenges: (a) the dynamic and multi-faceted nature of participation, (b) a need to integrate the concept of participation within the culture of oncology, and (c) identification of priority areas in which new lines of research regarding participation would be most impactful.

Attention to the principles of exercise training in exercise studies on prostate cancer survivors: a systematic review

Background

The purpose of this review is to update previously published reviews on exercise programming in exercise trials in prostate cancer survivors. We evaluated: 1) the application of the principles of exercise training in prescribed programs; 2) the reporting of the components of the exercise prescription; and 3) the reporting of adherence of participants to the prescribed programs.

Methods

Building upon a previous review, a systematic review was conducted searching OVID Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and SPORTDiscus databases from 2012-2017. Randomized controlled trials of at least four weeks of aerobic and/or resistance exercise in men diagnosed with prostate cancer that reported physical fitness outcomes, including body composition were eligible for inclusion.

Results

Specificity was appropriately applied by 93%, progression by 55%, overload by 48%, initial values by 55%, and diminishing returns by 28% of eligible studies. No study adequately applied the principle of reversibility. Most (79%) studies reported all components of the exercise prescription in the study methods, but no study reported all components of adherence to the prescribed intervention in the study results.

Conclusions

Application of standard exercise training principles is inadequate in exercise trials in men with prostate cancer and could possibly lead to an inadequate exercise stimulus. While many studies report the basic components of the exercise prescription in their study methods, full reporting of actual exercise completed is needed to advance our understanding of the optimal exercise dose for men with prostate cancer and promote translation of controlled trials to practice.

Effect of Increasing Levels of Web-Based Behavioral Support on Changes in Physical Activity, Diet, and Symptoms in Men With Prostate Cancer: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

Background

More than 3.1 million men in the United States are prostate cancer survivors. These men may improve their physical function, quality of life, and potentially their prognosis by adopting healthier lifestyle habits. The internet provides a scalable mechanism to deliver advice and support about improving physical activity and dietary habits, but the feasibility and acceptability of a Web-based lifestyle intervention and the dose of support necessary to improve health behaviors are not yet known.

Objectives

The Community of Wellness is a Web-based intervention focused on supporting exercise and healthy dietary practices for men with prostate cancer. The objectives of this study were to determine the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of the Community of Wellness Web portal among prostate cancer survivors by conducting a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing 4 levels of additive Web-based content and interaction with participants: Level 1 (Teaching; Control), Level 2 (Teaching + Tailoring), Level 3 (Teaching + Tailoring + Technology), and Level 4 (Teaching + Tailoring + Technology + Touch).

Methods

This is a single-blinded RCT comparing 3 levels of behavioral support within the Community of Wellness Web portal intervention (Levels 2 to 4) with each other and with the control condition (Level 1). The control condition receives general static Web-based educational information only on physical activity and dietary habits, self-efficacy for behavior change, motivation for physical activity, and changes in anxiety and treatment-related side effects. We will enroll and randomize 200 men with prostate cancer equally to 4 levels of the Community of Wellness Web-based intervention for 3 months (50 men per level). Surveys will be completed by self-report at baseline, 3 months (immediately postintervention), and 6 months (3 months postintervention). Feasibility and acceptability will be assessed by enrollment statistics, Web-based usage metrics, and surveys at the 3-month time point. We will also conduct focus groups after the postintervention follow-up assessment in a sample of enrolled participants to evaluate elements of usability and acceptability that cannot be obtained via surveys.

Results

Enrollment is ongoing, with 124 enrolled. Study completion (6-month follow-up) is expected by July 2019.

Conclusions

The goal of the study is to identify the level of support that is feasible, acceptable, promotes behavior change, and improves health in men with prostate cancer to inform future efforts to scale the program for broader reach.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03406013; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03406013 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/73YpDIoTX).

International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)

PRR1-10.2196/11257

Targeting Exercise Interventions to Patients With Cancer in Need: An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis

Background

Exercise effects in cancer patients often appear modest, possibly because interventions rarely target patients most in need. This study investigated the moderator effects of baseline values on the exercise outcomes of fatigue, aerobic fitness, muscle strength, quality of life (QoL), and self-reported physical function (PF) in cancer patients during and post-treatment.

Methods

Individual patient data from 34 randomized exercise trials (n = 4519) were pooled. Linear mixed-effect models were used to study moderator effects of baseline values on exercise intervention outcomes and to determine whether these moderator effects differed by intervention timing (during vs post-treatment). All statistical tests were two-sided.

Results

Moderator effects of baseline fatigue and PF were consistent across intervention timing, with greater effects in patients with worse fatigue (Pinteraction = .05) and worse PF (Pinteraction = .003). Moderator effects of baseline aerobic fitness, muscle strength, and QoL differed by intervention timing. During treatment, effects on aerobic fitness were greater for patients with better baseline aerobic fitness (Pinteraction = .002). Post-treatment, effects on upper (Pinteraction < .001) and lower (Pinteraction = .01) body muscle strength and QoL (Pinteraction < .001) were greater in patients with worse baseline values.

Conclusion

Although exercise should be encouraged for most cancer patients during and post-treatments, targeting specific subgroups may be especially beneficial and cost effective. For fatigue and PF, interventions during and post-treatment should target patients with high fatigue and low PF. During treatment, patients experience benefit for muscle strength and QoL regardless of baseline values; however, only patients with low baseline values benefit post-treatment. For aerobic fitness, patients with low baseline values do not appear to benefit from exercise during treatment.

Patient-reported and objectively measured physical function in older breast cancer survivors and cancer-free controls

OBJECTIVES

Older breast cancer survivors (BCS) consistently report more functional limitations than women without cancer, but whether or not these differences remain when using objective measures of physical functioning and the correlates of these measures is unknown.

METHODS

Cross-sectional study comparing older (≥60 years old) BCS (n = 84) to similarly aged women without cancer (n = 40). Patient-reported physical function was assessed by the SF-36 physical function (SF-36PF) subscale and the Late Life Function & Disability Instrument (LLFDI). Objective measures included the short Physical Performance Battery (sPPB), usual walk speed (m/s), chair stand time (sec) and, grip strength (kg). Potential predictors included age, comorbidities, symptom severity, fatigue and skeletal muscle index (SMI; kg/m²).

RESULTS

Patient-reported physical function was significantly lower in BCS than controls using SF-36PF (47.3 ± 0.1 vs. 52.9 ± 4.0, p < 0.001) and LLFDI (68.2 ± 10.5 vs. 75.0 ± 8.9, p = 0.001). BCS had significantly lower sPPB scores (10.7 ± 0.1 vs. 11.7 ± 0.5, p < 0.001), longer chair stand times (12.6 ± 3.7 vs. 10.1 ± 1.4 s, p < 0.001), and lower handgrip strength (22.3 ± 5.0 vs. 24.3 ± 4.4 kg, p = 0.03) than controls, but similar walk speed (1.1+0.2 vs. 1.1+0.1 m/s, p = 0.75). Within BCS, age, comorbidities, SMI, symptom severity and fatigue explained 17.3%-33.1% of the variance across physical function measures. Fatigue was the variable most consistently associated with patient-reported physical functioning and age and comorbidities were the variables most consistently associated with objectively measured physical functioning.

CONCLUSION

Older BCS should be screened for functional limitations using simple standardized objective tests and interventions that focus on improving strength and reducing fatigue should be tested.

Assessing the feasibility of parent participation in a commercial weight loss program to improve child body mass index and weight-related health behaviors

Objectives:

Little is known about how children’s health might be affected by parents’ participation in commercial weight loss programs. Given that more than 3.2 million people subscribe to just one commercial weight loss program, Weight Watchers, any secondary effects on children’s weight-related health behaviors (e.g. dietary behaviors, physical activity, and sedentary time) and body mass index from parent participation in commercial weight loss programs may have significant public health implications. This study examined the feasibility of conducting a study to assess such effects. Methods for recruitment and retention, and perceived acceptability and satisfaction among participants in small-scale preliminary study, were evaluated. Changes in body mass index and health behaviors among the parent–child dyads were also measured to test whether a larger-scale study would be warranted.

Methods:

This was an 8-week, pre–post observational feasibility study involving 20 parent–child dyads where both members had overweight or obesity. Physical and behavioral data were collected at baseline and 8 weeks from both members of the dyads. Parenting data were collected at the same time periods through parents’ self-report. Bivariate correlation was used to quantify the associations in changes for dyad members.

Results:

Feasibility goals for retention and perceived acceptability/satisfaction among participants were met. We reached approximately 80% of our enrollment goal. Parents showed a significant decrease in body mass index of 0.53 points (p < 0.05), while children showed a significant increase in raw body mass index (0.42, p < 0.05) and body mass index percentile (0.59, p < 0.05). However, correlation between changes in parent body mass index and changes in children body mass index percentile was positively correlated (r = 0.24, p = 0.31). A decrease in parent intake of total fat was associated with a decrease in the intake of fat in their children (r = 0.47, p < 0.05).

Conclusion:

Our findings support the viability of a larger-scale follow-up to assess the potential of using parent-only commercial weight loss program as a mechanism for improving health behaviors and body mass index in children with overweight or obesity.

Effects and moderators of exercise on muscle strength, muscle function and aerobic fitness in patients with cancer: a meta-analysis of individual patient data

Objective

To optimally target exercise interventions for patients with cancer, it is important to identify which patients benefit from which interventions.

Design

We conducted an individual patient data meta-analysis to investigate demographic, clinical, intervention-related and exercise-related moderators of exercise intervention effects on physical fitness in patients with cancer.

Data sources

We identified relevant studies via systematic searches in electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO and CINAHL).

Eligibility criteria

We analysed data from 28 randomised controlled trials investigating the effects of exercise on upper body muscle strength (UBMS) and lower body muscle strength (LBMS), lower body muscle function (LBMF) and aerobic fitness in adult patients with cancer.

Results

Exercise significantly improved UBMS (β=0.20, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.14 to 0.26), LBMS (β=0.29, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.35), LBMF (β=0.16, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.24) and aerobic fitness (β=0.28, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.34), with larger effects for supervised interventions. Exercise effects on UBMS were larger during treatment, when supervised interventions included ≥3 sessions per week, when resistance exercises were included and when session duration was >60 min. Exercise effects on LBMS were larger for patients who were living alone, for supervised interventions including resistance exercise and when session duration was >60 min. Exercise effects on aerobic fitness were larger for younger patients and when supervised interventions included aerobic exercise.

Conclusion

Exercise interventions during and following cancer treatment had small effects on UBMS, LBMS, LBMF and aerobic fitness. Demographic, intervention-related and exercise-related characteristics including age, marital status, intervention timing, delivery mode and frequency and type and time of exercise sessions moderated the exercise effect on UBMS, LBMS and aerobic fitness.

Cancer survivorship in the rural U.S. Columbia Pacific: A pilot study

106

Background: We provide the only fully staffed cancer center in the rural Columbia Pacific, serving multiple counties in OR and WA. Rural areas can lack resources to provide comprehensive survivorship care. Higher rates of medical comorbidities and socioeconomic barriers add challenges to rural survivorship. We conducted a pilot study to 1) develop a program for lifestyle and behavior modifications to fit the needs of our rural community and 2) determine feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a survivorship program for breast cancer patients. Methods: : 9 women with stage I-III breast cancer completed a 12-week program consisting of 1:1 meetings every 2 weeks with a physical therapist and registered dietician; health coach support; and access to a social worker. The following pre-post measures of physical health were taken: fasting lipids and glucose, HbA1C, waist circumference, blood pressure, BMI, 3-day physical activity log and food journal, joint range of motion, and muscle strength. Pre-post well-being was assessed by EORTC QLQC30 and focus groups. Results: Decreases in systolic BP, weight, waist circumference, fasting glucose, and HbA1c were seen in a majority of participants; however, only decreases in waist circumference reached statistical significance (p = .043). On post-program survey using a 0-10 rating scale, program acceptability was rated at an average of 7, and likelihood to continue at an average of 9.4; however, overall QOL rating had no change. Focus group feedback indicated participants valued dietician visits, but requested more social work support, exercise customization, and group support to foster mentoring, education, and sense of community. Conclusions: Developing a rural comprehensive survivorship care program is feasible. More work is needed to translate physical health goals into enhancement of well-being and improved QOL. As of 10/2/17 we have opened a comprehensive cancer center housing medical oncology and radiation oncology services in one facility. We now have a full-time dietitian, resource coordinator, and social worker. This unique facility is well poised to deliver long-term care to rural cancer survivors, and we believe could serve as a model for other rural regions.