1
|
Kraus KM, Oreshko M, Schnabel JA, Bernhardt D, Combs SE, Peeken JC. Dosiomics and radiomics-based prediction of pneumonitis after radiotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibition: The relevance of fractionation. Lung Cancer 2024; 189:107507. [PMID: 38394745 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Revised: 12/08/2023] [Accepted: 02/14/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Post-therapy pneumonitis (PTP) is a relevant side effect of thoracic radiotherapy and immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). The influence of the combination of both, including dose fractionation schemes on PTP development is still unclear. This study aims to improve the PTP risk estimation after radio(chemo)therapy (R(C)T) for lung cancer with and without ICI by investigation of the impact of dose fractionation on machine learning (ML)-based prediction. MATERIALS AND METHODS Data from 100 patients who received fractionated R(C)T were collected. 39 patients received additional ICI therapy. Computed Tomography (CT), RT segmentation and dose data were extracted and physical doses were converted to 2-Gy equivalent doses (EQD2) to account for different fractionation schemes. Features were reduced using Pearson intercorrelation and the Boruta algorithm within 1000-fold bootstrapping. Six single (clinics, Dose Volume Histogram (DVH), ICI, chemotherapy, radiomics, dosiomics) and four combined models (radiomics + dosiomics, radiomics + DVH + Clinics, dosiomics + DVH + Clinics, radiomics + dosiomics + DVH + Clinics) were trained to predict PTP. Dose-based models were tested using physical dose and EQD2. Four ML-algorithms (random forest (rf), logistic elastic net regression, support vector machine, logitBoost) were trained and tested using 5-fold nested cross validation and Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) for resampling in R. Prediction was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) on the test sets of the outer folds. RESULTS The combined model of all features using EQD2 surpassed all other models (AUC = 0.77, Confidence Interval CI 0.76-0.78). DVH, clinical data and ICI therapy had minor impact on PTP prediction with AUC values between 0.42 and 0.57. All EQD2-based models outperformed models based on physical dose. CONCLUSIONS Radiomics + dosiomics based ML models combined with clinical and dosimetric models were found to be suited best for PTP prediction after R(C)T and could improve pre-treatment decision making. Different RT dose fractionation schemes should be considered for dose-based ML approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kim Melanie Kraus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine and Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany; Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München (HMGU) GmbH, German Research Center for Environmental Health, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany; Partner Site Munich, German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), 80336 Munich, Germany.
| | - Maksym Oreshko
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine and Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany; Medical Faculty, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 80539 Munich, Germany
| | - Julia Anne Schnabel
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; School of Computation, Information and Technology, Technical University of Munich, Germany; Institute of Machine Learning in Biomedical Imaging, Helmholtz Zentrum München (HMGU) GmbH, German Research Center for Environmental Health, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Denise Bernhardt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine and Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany; Partner Site Munich, German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), 80336 Munich, Germany
| | - Stephanie Elisabeth Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine and Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany; Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München (HMGU) GmbH, German Research Center for Environmental Health, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany; Partner Site Munich, German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), 80336 Munich, Germany
| | - Jan Caspar Peeken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine and Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany; Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München (HMGU) GmbH, German Research Center for Environmental Health, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany; Partner Site Munich, German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), 80336 Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kraus KM, Oreshko M, Bernhardt D, Combs SE, Peeken JC. The Value of Equivalent Dose Calculation for Dosiomics and Radiomics-Based Prediction of Pneumonitis after Thoracic Radiotherapy with Immune Checkpoint Inhibition. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:e473. [PMID: 37785503 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.1683] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) Post-therapy pneumonitis (PTP) is a relevant side effect after thoracic radiotherapy (RT) and immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). The impact of the combination of both is unclear. We aim to improve risk estimation by prediction of PTP with and without ICI therapy. To analyze the influence of different fractionation schemes, the value of voxel-wise 2 Gy equivalent dose (EQD2) is investigated. MATERIALS/METHODS Clinical data from 100 patients who received fractionated RT (single dose ≤ 3Gy) RT were collected. 36 patients received additional ICI therapy. PTP of all grades were monitored. Planning Computed tomographies (CTs), segmentations and 3D dose data were extracted and converted to EQD2. Dosiomics and radiomics features were extracted using 1000-fold bootstrapping using Pearson intercorrelation and the Boruta algorithm for 5 single and 4 combined predictive models. Machine learning algorithms (random forest (rf), logistic elastic net regression, support vector machine, logitBoost) were trained and tested using a 5-fold nested cross validation approach and Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique resampling in R. Analysis was performed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) on the test sets of the outer folds. RESULTS All investigated models predicted PTP better than random (AUC>.5) (Table 1). Dosiomics+Radiomics models based on EQD2 using rf classifier resulted in the highest predictive performance (AUC = .83 (95% Confidence Interval .83-.84)) and performed worse on physical dose data (AUC = .72 (.71-.73)). For single models, radiomics and dosiomics achieved the best prediction (AUC = .73 (.72-.74), AUC = .8 (.79-.81)) for physical dose and EQD2, respectively. Clinical factors and ICI therapy (AUC = .6 (.59-.62)) had minor impact on PTP prediction. Table 1: AUC and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for all investigated Machine Learning models for EQD2 and physical doses (D). CONCLUSION Dosiomics+Radiomics machine learning models have strong capability of PTP prediction and could contribute to pre-treatment decision making. Fractionation schemes should be considered for dose-based prediction strategies. Additional ICI therapy has limited impact on PTP prediction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K M Kraus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine and Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany; Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München (HMGU) GmbH German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - M Oreshko
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine and Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany; Medical Faculty, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - D Bernhardt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine and Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Germany, Munich, Germany
| | - S E Combs
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München (HMGU) GmbH German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - J C Peeken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine and Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany; Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München (HMGU) GmbH German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kraus KM, Oreshko M, Bernhardt D, Combs SE, Peeken JC. Dosiomics and radiomics to predict pneumonitis after thoracic stereotactic body radiotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibition. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1124592. [PMID: 37007119 PMCID: PMC10050584 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1124592] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Accepted: 03/01/2023] [Indexed: 03/17/2023] Open
Abstract
IntroductionPneumonitis is a relevant side effect after radiotherapy (RT) and immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Since the effect is radiation dose dependent, the risk increases for high fractional doses as applied for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and might even be enhanced for the combination of SBRT with ICI therapy. Hence, patient individual pre-treatment prediction of post-treatment pneumonitis (PTP) might be able to support clinical decision making. Dosimetric factors, however, use limited information and, thus, cannot exploit the full potential of pneumonitis prediction.MethodsWe investigated dosiomics and radiomics model based approaches for PTP prediction after thoracic SBRT with and without ICI therapy. To overcome potential influences of different fractionation schemes, we converted physical doses to 2 Gy equivalent doses (EQD2) and compared both results. In total, four single feature models (dosiomics, radiomics, dosimetric, clinical factors) were tested and five combinations of those (dosimetric+clinical factors, dosiomics+radiomics, dosiomics+dosimetric+clinical factors, radiomics+dosimetric+clinical factors, radiomics+dosiomics+dosimetric+clinical factors). After feature extraction, a feature reduction was performed using pearson intercorrelation coefficient and the Boruta algorithm within 1000-fold bootstrapping runs. Four different machine learning models and the combination of those were trained and tested within 100 iterations of 5-fold nested cross validation.ResultsResults were analysed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). We found the combination of dosiomics and radiomics features to outperform all other models with AUCradiomics+dosiomics, D = 0.79 (95% confidence interval 0.78-0.80) and AUCradiomics+dosiomics, EQD2 = 0.77 (0.76-0.78) for physical dose and EQD2, respectively. ICI therapy did not impact the prediction result (AUC ≤ 0.5). Clinical and dosimetric features for the total lung did not improve the prediction outcome.ConclusionOur results suggest that combined dosiomics and radiomics analysis can improve PTP prediction in patients treated with lung SBRT. We conclude that pre-treatment prediction could support clinical decision making on an individual patient basis with or without ICI therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kim Melanie Kraus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine and Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München (HMGU) GmbH German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany
- Partner Site Munich, German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), Munich, Germany
- *Correspondence: Kim Melanie Kraus,
| | - Maksym Oreshko
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine and Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
- Medical Faculty, University hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Denise Bernhardt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine and Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
- Partner Site Munich, German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), Munich, Germany
| | - Stephanie Elisabeth Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine and Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München (HMGU) GmbH German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany
- Partner Site Munich, German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), Munich, Germany
| | - Jan Caspar Peeken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine and Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München (HMGU) GmbH German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany
- Partner Site Munich, German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|