1
|
Foreman SC, Schinz D, El Husseini M, Goller SS, Weißinger J, Dietrich AS, Renz M, Metz MC, Feuerriegel GC, Wiestler B, Stahl R, Schwaiger BJ, Makowski MR, Kirschke JS, Gersing AS. Deep Learning to Differentiate Benign and Malignant Vertebral Fractures at Multidetector CT. Radiology 2024; 310:e231429. [PMID: 38530172 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.231429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/27/2024]
Abstract
Background Differentiating between benign and malignant vertebral fractures poses diagnostic challenges. Purpose To investigate the reliability of CT-based deep learning models to differentiate between benign and malignant vertebral fractures. Materials and Methods CT scans acquired in patients with benign or malignant vertebral fractures from June 2005 to December 2022 at two university hospitals were retrospectively identified based on a composite reference standard that included histopathologic and radiologic information. An internal test set was randomly selected, and an external test set was obtained from an additional hospital. Models used a three-dimensional U-Net encoder-classifier architecture and applied data augmentation during training. Performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and compared with that of two residents and one fellowship-trained radiologist using the DeLong test. Results The training set included 381 patients (mean age, 69.9 years ± 11.4 [SD]; 193 male) with 1307 vertebrae (378 benign fractures, 447 malignant fractures, 482 malignant lesions). Internal and external test sets included 86 (mean age, 66.9 years ± 12; 45 male) and 65 (mean age, 68.8 years ± 12.5; 39 female) patients, respectively. The better-performing model of two training approaches achieved AUCs of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.77, 0.92) in the internal and 0.75 (95% CI: 0.64, 0.85) in the external test sets. Including an uncertainty category further improved performance to AUCs of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.83, 0.97) in the internal test set and 0.76 (95% CI: 0.64, 0.88) in the external test set. The AUC values of residents were lower than that of the best-performing model in the internal test set (AUC, 0.69 [95% CI: 0.59, 0.78] and 0.71 [95% CI: 0.61, 0.80]) and external test set (AUC, 0.70 [95% CI: 0.58, 0.80] and 0.71 [95% CI: 0.60, 0.82]), with significant differences only for the internal test set (P < .001). The AUCs of the fellowship-trained radiologist were similar to those of the best-performing model (internal test set, 0.86 [95% CI: 0.78, 0.93; P = .39]; external test set, 0.71 [95% CI: 0.60, 0.82; P = .46]). Conclusion Developed models showed a high discriminatory power to differentiate between benign and malignant vertebral fractures, surpassing or matching the performance of radiology residents and matching that of a fellowship-trained radiologist. © RSNA, 2024 See also the editorial by Booz and D'Angelo in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah C Foreman
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.C.F., A.S.D., G.C.F., M.R.M.) and Neuroradiology (D.S., M.E.H., M.R., M.C.M., B.W., B.J.S., J.S.K.), Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675 Munich, Germany; Departments of Radiology (S.S.G., J.W.) and Neuroradiology (R.S., A.S.G.), University Hospital Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany; and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany (B.W.)
| | - David Schinz
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.C.F., A.S.D., G.C.F., M.R.M.) and Neuroradiology (D.S., M.E.H., M.R., M.C.M., B.W., B.J.S., J.S.K.), Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675 Munich, Germany; Departments of Radiology (S.S.G., J.W.) and Neuroradiology (R.S., A.S.G.), University Hospital Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany; and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany (B.W.)
| | - Malek El Husseini
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.C.F., A.S.D., G.C.F., M.R.M.) and Neuroradiology (D.S., M.E.H., M.R., M.C.M., B.W., B.J.S., J.S.K.), Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675 Munich, Germany; Departments of Radiology (S.S.G., J.W.) and Neuroradiology (R.S., A.S.G.), University Hospital Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany; and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany (B.W.)
| | - Sophia S Goller
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.C.F., A.S.D., G.C.F., M.R.M.) and Neuroradiology (D.S., M.E.H., M.R., M.C.M., B.W., B.J.S., J.S.K.), Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675 Munich, Germany; Departments of Radiology (S.S.G., J.W.) and Neuroradiology (R.S., A.S.G.), University Hospital Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany; and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany (B.W.)
| | - Jürgen Weißinger
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.C.F., A.S.D., G.C.F., M.R.M.) and Neuroradiology (D.S., M.E.H., M.R., M.C.M., B.W., B.J.S., J.S.K.), Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675 Munich, Germany; Departments of Radiology (S.S.G., J.W.) and Neuroradiology (R.S., A.S.G.), University Hospital Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany; and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany (B.W.)
| | - Anna-Sophia Dietrich
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.C.F., A.S.D., G.C.F., M.R.M.) and Neuroradiology (D.S., M.E.H., M.R., M.C.M., B.W., B.J.S., J.S.K.), Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675 Munich, Germany; Departments of Radiology (S.S.G., J.W.) and Neuroradiology (R.S., A.S.G.), University Hospital Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany; and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany (B.W.)
| | - Martin Renz
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.C.F., A.S.D., G.C.F., M.R.M.) and Neuroradiology (D.S., M.E.H., M.R., M.C.M., B.W., B.J.S., J.S.K.), Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675 Munich, Germany; Departments of Radiology (S.S.G., J.W.) and Neuroradiology (R.S., A.S.G.), University Hospital Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany; and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany (B.W.)
| | - Marie-Christin Metz
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.C.F., A.S.D., G.C.F., M.R.M.) and Neuroradiology (D.S., M.E.H., M.R., M.C.M., B.W., B.J.S., J.S.K.), Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675 Munich, Germany; Departments of Radiology (S.S.G., J.W.) and Neuroradiology (R.S., A.S.G.), University Hospital Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany; and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany (B.W.)
| | - Georg C Feuerriegel
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.C.F., A.S.D., G.C.F., M.R.M.) and Neuroradiology (D.S., M.E.H., M.R., M.C.M., B.W., B.J.S., J.S.K.), Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675 Munich, Germany; Departments of Radiology (S.S.G., J.W.) and Neuroradiology (R.S., A.S.G.), University Hospital Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany; and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany (B.W.)
| | - Benedikt Wiestler
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.C.F., A.S.D., G.C.F., M.R.M.) and Neuroradiology (D.S., M.E.H., M.R., M.C.M., B.W., B.J.S., J.S.K.), Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675 Munich, Germany; Departments of Radiology (S.S.G., J.W.) and Neuroradiology (R.S., A.S.G.), University Hospital Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany; and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany (B.W.)
| | - Robert Stahl
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.C.F., A.S.D., G.C.F., M.R.M.) and Neuroradiology (D.S., M.E.H., M.R., M.C.M., B.W., B.J.S., J.S.K.), Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675 Munich, Germany; Departments of Radiology (S.S.G., J.W.) and Neuroradiology (R.S., A.S.G.), University Hospital Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany; and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany (B.W.)
| | - Benedikt J Schwaiger
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.C.F., A.S.D., G.C.F., M.R.M.) and Neuroradiology (D.S., M.E.H., M.R., M.C.M., B.W., B.J.S., J.S.K.), Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675 Munich, Germany; Departments of Radiology (S.S.G., J.W.) and Neuroradiology (R.S., A.S.G.), University Hospital Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany; and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany (B.W.)
| | - Marcus R Makowski
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.C.F., A.S.D., G.C.F., M.R.M.) and Neuroradiology (D.S., M.E.H., M.R., M.C.M., B.W., B.J.S., J.S.K.), Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675 Munich, Germany; Departments of Radiology (S.S.G., J.W.) and Neuroradiology (R.S., A.S.G.), University Hospital Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany; and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany (B.W.)
| | - Jan S Kirschke
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.C.F., A.S.D., G.C.F., M.R.M.) and Neuroradiology (D.S., M.E.H., M.R., M.C.M., B.W., B.J.S., J.S.K.), Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675 Munich, Germany; Departments of Radiology (S.S.G., J.W.) and Neuroradiology (R.S., A.S.G.), University Hospital Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany; and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany (B.W.)
| | - Alexandra S Gersing
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.C.F., A.S.D., G.C.F., M.R.M.) and Neuroradiology (D.S., M.E.H., M.R., M.C.M., B.W., B.J.S., J.S.K.), Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675 Munich, Germany; Departments of Radiology (S.S.G., J.W.) and Neuroradiology (R.S., A.S.G.), University Hospital Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany; and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany (B.W.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rühling S, Dittmann J, Müller T, Husseini ME, Bodden J, Hernandez Petzsche MR, Löffler MT, Sollmann N, Baum T, Seifert-Klauss V, Wostrack M, Zimmer C, Kirschke JS. Sex differences and age-related changes in vertebral body volume and volumetric bone mineral density at the thoracolumbar spine using opportunistic QCT. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2024; 15:1352048. [PMID: 38440788 PMCID: PMC10911120 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1352048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2023] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 03/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Objectives To quantitatively investigate the age- and sex-related longitudinal changes in trabecular volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) and vertebral body volume at the thoracolumbar spine in adults. Methods We retrospectively included 168 adults (mean age 58.7 ± 9.8 years, 51 women) who received ≥7 MDCT scans over a period of ≥6.5 years (mean follow-up 9.0 ± 2.1 years) for clinical reasons. Level-wise vBMD and vertebral body volume were extracted from 22720 thoracolumbar vertebrae using a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based framework with asynchronous calibration and correction of the contrast media phase. Human readers conducted semiquantitative assessment of fracture status and bony degenerations. Results In the 40-60 years age group, women had a significantly higher trabecular vBMD than men at all thoracolumbar levels (p<0.05 to p<0.001). Conversely, men, on average, had larger vertebrae with lower vBMD. This sex difference in vBMD did not persist in the 60-80 years age group. While the lumbar (T12-L5) vBMD slopes in women only showed a non-significant trend of accelerated decline with age, vertebrae T1-11 displayed a distinct pattern, with women demonstrating a significantly accelerated decline compared to men (p<0.01 to p<0.0001). Between baseline and last follow-up examinations, the vertebral body volume slightly increased in women (T1-12: 1.1 ± 1.0 cm3; L1-5: 1.0 ± 1.4 cm3) and men (T1-12: 1.2 ± 1.3 cm3; L1-5: 1.5 ± 1.6 cm3). After excluding vertebrae with bony degenerations, the residual increase was only small in women (T1-12: 0.6 ± 0.6 cm3; L1-5: 0.7 ± 0.7 cm3) and men (T1-12: 0.7 ± 0.6 cm3; L1-5: 1.2 ± 0.8 cm3). In non-degenerated vertebrae, the mean change in volume was <5% of the respective vertebral body volumes. Conclusion Sex differences in thoracolumbar vBMD were apparent before menopause, and disappeared after menopause, likely attributable to an accelerated and more profound vBMD decline in women at the thoracic spine. In patients without advanced spine degeneration, the overall volumetric changes in the vertebral body appeared subtle.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Rühling
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jonas Dittmann
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Tobias Müller
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Malek El Husseini
- Department of Informatics, TUM School of Computation, Information and Technology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jannis Bodden
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Moritz R Hernandez Petzsche
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Maximilian T Löffler
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Nico Sollmann
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- TUM-Neuroimaging Center, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Thomas Baum
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Vanadin Seifert-Klauss
- Department of Gynaecology, Interdisciplinary Osteoporosis Center, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Maria Wostrack
- Department of Neurosurgery, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Claus Zimmer
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jan S Kirschke
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lauerer M, McGinnis J, Bussas M, El Husseini M, Pongratz V, Engl C, Wuschek A, Berthele A, Riederer I, Kirschke JS, Zimmer C, Hemmer B, Mühlau M. Prognostic value of spinal cord lesion measures in early relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2023; 95:37-43. [PMID: 37495267 PMCID: PMC10804039 DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2023-331799] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2023] [Accepted: 07/12/2023] [Indexed: 07/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Spinal cord (SC) lesions have been associated with unfavourable clinical outcomes in multiple sclerosis (MS). However, the relation of whole SC lesion number (SCLN) and volume (SCLV) to the future occurrence and type of confirmed disability accumulation (CDA) remains largely unexplored. METHODS In this monocentric retrospective study, SC lesions were manually delineated. Inclusion criteria were: age between 18 and 60 years, relapsing-remitting MS, disease duration under 2 years and clinical follow-up of 5 years. The first CDA event after baseline, determined by a sustained increase in the Expanded Disability Status Scale over 6 months, was classified as either progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA) or relapse-associated worsening (RAW). SCLN and SCLV were compared between different (sub)groups to assess their prospective value. RESULTS 204 patients were included, 148 of which had at least one SC lesion and 59 experienced CDA. Patients without any SC lesions experienced significantly less CDA (OR 5.8, 95% CI 2.1 to 19.8). SCLN and SCLV were closely correlated (rs=0.91, p<0.001) and were both significantly associated with CDA on follow-up (p<0.001). Subgroup analyses confirmed this association for patients with PIRA on CDA (34 events, p<0.001 for both SC lesion measures) but not for RAW (25 events, p=0.077 and p=0.22). CONCLUSION Patients without any SC lesions are notably less likely to experience CDA. Both the number and volume of SC lesions on MRI are associated with future accumulation of disability largely independent of relapses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markus Lauerer
- Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Technical University, Munich, Germany
- TUM-Neuroimaging Center, School of Medicine, Technical University, Munich, Germany
| | - Julian McGinnis
- Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Technical University, Munich, Germany
- Institute for AI in Medicine, Technical University, Munich, Germany
| | - Matthias Bussas
- Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Technical University, Munich, Germany
- TUM-Neuroimaging Center, School of Medicine, Technical University, Munich, Germany
| | - Malek El Husseini
- Department of Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Technical University, Munich, Germany
| | - Viola Pongratz
- Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Technical University, Munich, Germany
- TUM-Neuroimaging Center, School of Medicine, Technical University, Munich, Germany
| | - Christina Engl
- Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Technical University, Munich, Germany
| | - Alexander Wuschek
- Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Technical University, Munich, Germany
| | - Achim Berthele
- Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Technical University, Munich, Germany
| | - Isabelle Riederer
- Department of Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Technical University, Munich, Germany
| | - Jan S Kirschke
- Department of Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Technical University, Munich, Germany
| | - Claus Zimmer
- Department of Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Technical University, Munich, Germany
| | - Bernhard Hemmer
- Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Technical University, Munich, Germany
- Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, Germany
| | - Mark Mühlau
- Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Technical University, Munich, Germany
- TUM-Neuroimaging Center, School of Medicine, Technical University, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Schlaeger S, Drummer K, El Husseini M, Kofler F, Sollmann N, Schramm S, Zimmer C, Wiestler B, Kirschke JS. Synthetic T2-weighted fat sat based on a generative adversarial network shows potential for scan time reduction in spine imaging in a multicenter test dataset. Eur Radiol 2023; 33:5882-5893. [PMID: 36928566 PMCID: PMC10326102 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-09512-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2022] [Revised: 11/17/2022] [Accepted: 02/03/2023] [Indexed: 03/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES T2-weighted (w) fat sat (fs) sequences, which are important in spine MRI, require a significant amount of scan time. Generative adversarial networks (GANs) can generate synthetic T2-w fs images. We evaluated the potential of synthetic T2-w fs images by comparing them to their true counterpart regarding image and fat saturation quality, and diagnostic agreement in a heterogenous, multicenter dataset. METHODS A GAN was used to synthesize T2-w fs from T1- and non-fs T2-w. The training dataset comprised scans of 73 patients from two scanners, and the test dataset, scans of 101 patients from 38 multicenter scanners. Apparent signal- and contrast-to-noise ratios (aSNR/aCNR) were measured in true and synthetic T2-w fs. Two neuroradiologists graded image (5-point scale) and fat saturation quality (3-point scale). To evaluate whether the T2-w fs images are indistinguishable, a Turing test was performed by eleven neuroradiologists. Six pathologies were graded on the synthetic protocol (with synthetic T2-w fs) and the original protocol (with true T2-w fs) by the two neuroradiologists. RESULTS aSNR and aCNR were not significantly different between the synthetic and true T2-w fs images. Subjective image quality was graded higher for synthetic T2-w fs (p = 0.023). In the Turing test, synthetic and true T2-w fs could not be distinguished from each other. The intermethod agreement between synthetic and original protocol ranged from substantial to almost perfect agreement for the evaluated pathologies. DISCUSSION The synthetic T2-w fs might replace a physical T2-w fs. Our approach validated on a challenging, multicenter dataset is highly generalizable and allows for shorter scan protocols. KEY POINTS • Generative adversarial networks can be used to generate synthetic T2-weighted fat sat images from T1- and non-fat sat T2-weighted images of the spine. • The synthetic T2-weighted fat sat images might replace a physically acquired T2-weighted fat sat showing a better image quality and excellent diagnostic agreement with the true T2-weighted fat images. • The present approach validated on a challenging, multicenter dataset is highly generalizable and allows for significantly shorter scan protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Schlaeger
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
| | - Katharina Drummer
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Malek El Husseini
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Florian Kofler
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Informatics, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- TranslaTUM - Central Institute for Translational Cancer Research, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Helmholtz AI, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Munich, Germany
| | - Nico Sollmann
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- TUM-NeuroImaging Center, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Severin Schramm
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Claus Zimmer
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- TUM-NeuroImaging Center, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Benedikt Wiestler
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jan S Kirschke
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- TUM-NeuroImaging Center, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bodden J, Dieckmeyer M, Sollmann N, Burian E, Rühling S, Löffler MT, Sekuboyina A, El Husseini M, Zimmer C, Kirschke JS, Baum T. Incidental vertebral fracture prediction using neuronal network-based automatic spine segmentation and volumetric bone mineral density extraction from routine clinical CT scans. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2023; 14:1207949. [PMID: 37529605 PMCID: PMC10390306 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1207949] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2023] [Accepted: 06/14/2023] [Indexed: 08/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives To investigate vertebral osteoporotic fracture (VF) prediction by automatically extracted trabecular volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) from routine CT, and to compare the model with fracture prevalence-based prediction models. Methods This single-center retrospective study included patients who underwent two thoraco-abdominal CT scans during clinical routine with an average inter-scan interval of 21.7 ± 13.1 months (range 5-52 months). Automatic spine segmentation and vBMD extraction was performed by a convolutional neural network framework (anduin.bonescreen.de). Mean vBMD was calculated for levels T5-8, T9-12, and L1-5. VFs were identified by an expert in spine imaging. Odds ratios (ORs) for prevalent and incident VFs were calculated for vBMD (per standard deviation decrease) at each level, for baseline VF prevalence (yes/no), and for baseline VF count (n) using logistic regression models, adjusted for age and sex. Models were compared using Akaike's and Bayesian information criteria (AIC & BIC). Results 420 patients (mean age, 63 years ± 9, 276 males) were included in this study. 40 (25 female) had prevalent and 24 (13 female) had incident VFs. Individuals with lower vBMD at any spine level had higher odds for VFs (L1-5, prevalent VF: OR,95%-CI,p: 2.2, 1.4-3.5,p=0.001; incident VF: 3.5, 1.8-6.9,p<0.001). In contrast, VF status (2.15, 0.72-6.43,p=0.170) and count (1.38, 0.89-2.12,p=0.147) performed worse in incident VF prediction. Information criteria revealed best fit for vBMD-based models (AIC vBMD=165.2; VF status=181.0; count=180.7). Conclusions VF prediction based on automatically extracted vBMD from routine clinical MDCT outperforms prediction models based on VF status and count. These findings underline the importance of opportunistic quantitative osteoporosis screening in clinical routine MDCT data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jannis Bodden
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Michael Dieckmeyer
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Nico Sollmann
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- TUM-Neuroimaging Center, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Egon Burian
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sebastian Rühling
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Maximilian T. Löffler
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Anjany Sekuboyina
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Informatics, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Munich School of BioEngineering, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Malek El Husseini
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Informatics, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Claus Zimmer
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- TUM-Neuroimaging Center, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jan S. Kirschke
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- TUM-Neuroimaging Center, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Thomas Baum
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Schlaeger S, Drummer K, Husseini ME, Kofler F, Sollmann N, Schramm S, Zimmer C, Kirschke JS, Wiestler B. Implementation of GAN-Based, Synthetic T2-Weighted Fat Saturated Images in the Routine Radiological Workflow Improves Spinal Pathology Detection. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:diagnostics13050974. [PMID: 36900118 PMCID: PMC10000723 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13050974] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2023] [Revised: 02/16/2023] [Accepted: 02/24/2023] [Indexed: 03/08/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background and Purpose: In magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the spine, T2-weighted (T2-w) fat-saturated (fs) images improve the diagnostic assessment of pathologies. However, in the daily clinical setting, additional T2-w fs images are frequently missing due to time constraints or motion artifacts. Generative adversarial networks (GANs) can generate synthetic T2-w fs images in a clinically feasible time. Therefore, by simulating the radiological workflow with a heterogenous dataset, this study's purpose was to evaluate the diagnostic value of additional synthetic, GAN-based T2-w fs images in the clinical routine. (2) Methods: 174 patients with MRI of the spine were retrospectively identified. A GAN was trained to synthesize T2-w fs images from T1-w, and non-fs T2-w images of 73 patients scanned in our institution. Subsequently, the GAN was used to create synthetic T2-w fs images for the previously unseen 101 patients from multiple institutions. In this test dataset, the additional diagnostic value of synthetic T2-w fs images was assessed in six pathologies by two neuroradiologists. Pathologies were first graded on T1-w and non-fs T2-w images only, then synthetic T2-w fs images were added, and pathologies were graded again. Evaluation of the additional diagnostic value of the synthetic protocol was performed by calculation of Cohen's ĸ and accuracy in comparison to a ground truth (GT) grading based on real T2-w fs images, pre- or follow-up scans, other imaging modalities, and clinical information. (3) Results: The addition of the synthetic T2-w fs to the imaging protocol led to a more precise grading of abnormalities than when grading was based on T1-w and non-fs T2-w images only (mean ĸ GT versus synthetic protocol = 0.65; mean ĸ GT versus T1/T2 = 0.56; p = 0.043). (4) Conclusions: The implementation of synthetic T2-w fs images in the radiological workflow significantly improves the overall assessment of spine pathologies. Thereby, high-quality, synthetic T2-w fs images can be virtually generated by a GAN from heterogeneous, multicenter T1-w and non-fs T2-w contrasts in a clinically feasible time, which underlines the reproducibility and generalizability of our approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Schlaeger
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 Munich, Germany
- Correspondence:
| | - Katharina Drummer
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Malek El Husseini
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Florian Kofler
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 Munich, Germany
- Department of Informatics, Technical University of Munich, Boltzmannstr. 3, 85748 Garching, Germany
- TranslaTUM—Central Institute for Translational Cancer Research, Technical University of Munich, Einsteinstr. 25, 81675 Munich, Germany
- Helmholtz AI, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingostaedter Landstrasse 1, 85764 Oberschleissheim, Germany
| | - Nico Sollmann
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 Munich, Germany
- TUM-NeuroImaging Center, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081 Ulm, Germany
| | - Severin Schramm
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Claus Zimmer
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 Munich, Germany
- TUM-NeuroImaging Center, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Jan S. Kirschke
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 Munich, Germany
- TUM-NeuroImaging Center, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Benedikt Wiestler
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wuschek A, Bussas M, El Husseini M, Harabacz L, Pineker V, Pongratz V, Berthele A, Riederer I, Zimmer C, Hemmer B, Kirschke JS, Mühlau M. Somatosensory evoked potentials and magnetic resonance imaging of the central nervous system in early multiple sclerosis. J Neurol 2023; 270:824-830. [PMID: 36205793 PMCID: PMC9886619 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-022-11407-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2022] [Revised: 09/26/2022] [Accepted: 09/27/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP) are still broadly used, although not explicitly recommended, for the diagnostic work-up of suspected multiple sclerosis (MS). OBJECTIVE To relate disability, SSEP, and lesions on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with early MS. METHODS In this monocentric retrospective study, we analyzed a cohort of patients with relapsing-remitting MS or clinically isolated syndrome, with a maximum disease duration of two years, as well as with available data on the score at the expanded disability status scale (EDSS), on SSEP, on whole spinal cord (SC) MRI, and on brain MRI. RESULTS Complete data of 161 patients were available. Tibial nerve SSEP (tSSEP) were less frequently abnormal than SC MRI (22% vs. 68%, p < 0.001). However, higher EDSS scores were significantly associated with abnormal tSSEP (median, 2.0 vs. 1.0; p = 0.001) but not with abnormal SC MRI (i.e., at least one lesion; median, 1.5 vs. 1.5; p = 0.7). Of the 35 patients with abnormal tSSEP, 32 had lesions on SC MRI, and 2 had corresponding lesions on brain MRI. CONCLUSION Compared to tSSEP, SC MRI is the more sensitive diagnostic biomarker regarding SC involvement. In early MS, lesions as detectable by T2-weighted MRI are the main driver of abnormal tSSEP. However, tSSEP were more closely associated with disability, which is compatible with a potential role of tSSEP as prognostic biomarker in complementation of MRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Wuschek
- Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.,TUM-Neuroimaging Center, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Matthias Bussas
- Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.,TUM-Neuroimaging Center, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Malek El Husseini
- Dept. of Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Laura Harabacz
- Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Viktor Pineker
- Dept. of Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Viola Pongratz
- Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.,TUM-Neuroimaging Center, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Achim Berthele
- Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Isabelle Riederer
- TUM-Neuroimaging Center, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,Dept. of Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Claus Zimmer
- Dept. of Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Bernhard Hemmer
- Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.,Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, Germany
| | - Jan S Kirschke
- Dept. of Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Mark Mühlau
- Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany. .,TUM-Neuroimaging Center, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Pongratz V, Bussas M, Schmidt P, Grahl S, Gasperi C, El Husseini M, Harabacz L, Pineker V, Sepp D, Grundl L, Wiestler B, Kirschke J, Zimmer C, Berthele A, Hemmer B, Mühlau M. Lesion location across diagnostic regions in multiple sclerosis. Neuroimage Clin 2023; 37:103311. [PMID: 36623350 PMCID: PMC9850035 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2022.103311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2022] [Revised: 12/03/2022] [Accepted: 12/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lesions in the periventricular, (juxta)cortical, and infratentorial region, as visible on brain MRI, are part of the diagnostic criteria for Multiple sclerosis (MS) whereas lesions in the subcortical region are currently only a marker of disease activity. It is unknown whether MS lesions follow individual spatial patterns or whether they occur in a random manner across diagnostic regions. AIM First, to describe cross-sectionally the spatial lesion patterns in patients with MS. Second, to investigate the spatial association of new lesions and lesions at baseline across diagnostic regions. METHODS Experienced neuroradiologists analyzed brain MRI (3D, 3T) in a cohort of 330 early MS patients. Lesions at baseline and new solitary lesions after two years were segmented (manually and by consensus) and classified as periventricular, (juxta)cortical, or infratentorial (diagnostic regions) or subcortical-with or without Gadolinium-enhancement. Gadolinium enhancement of lesions in the different regions was compared by Chi square test. New lesions in the four regions served as dependent variable in four zero-inflated Poisson models each with the six independent variables of lesions in the four regions at baseline, age and gender. RESULTS At baseline, lesions were most often observed in the subcortical region (mean 13.0 lesions/patient), while lesion volume was highest in the periventricular region (mean 2287 µl/patient). Subcortical lesions were less likely to show gadolinium enhancement (3.1 %) than juxtacortical (4.3 %), periventricular (5.3 %) or infratentorial lesions (7.2 %). Age was inversely correlated with new periventricular, juxtacortical and subcortical lesions. New lesions in the periventricular, juxtacortical and infratentorial region showed a significant autocorrelative behavior being positively related to the number of lesions in the respective regions at baseline. New lesions in the subcortical region showed a different behavior with a positive association with baseline periventricular lesions and a negative association with baseline infratentorial lesions. CONCLUSION Across regions, new lesions do not occur randomly; instead, new lesions in the periventricular, juxtacortical and infratentorial diagnostic region are associated with that at baseline. Lesions in the subcortical regions are more closely related to periventricular lesions. Moreover, subcortical lesions substantially contribute to lesion burden in MS but are less likely to show gadolinium enhancement (than lesions in the diagnostic regions).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Viola Pongratz
- Neurology, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, Munich 81541, Germany.
| | - Matthias Bussas
- Neurology, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, Munich 81541, Germany
| | - Paul Schmidt
- Paul Schmidt, Statistical Consulting, Große Seestraße 8, Berlin 13086, Germany
| | - Sophia Grahl
- Neurology, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, Munich 81541, Germany
| | - Christiane Gasperi
- Neurology, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, Munich 81541, Germany
| | - Malek El Husseini
- Neuroradiology, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, Munich 81541, Germany
| | - Laura Harabacz
- Neurology, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, Munich 81541, Germany
| | - Viktor Pineker
- Neuroradiology, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, Munich 81541, Germany
| | - Dominik Sepp
- Neuroradiology, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, Munich 81541, Germany
| | - Lioba Grundl
- Neuroradiology, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, Munich 81541, Germany
| | - Benedikt Wiestler
- Neuroradiology, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, Munich 81541, Germany
| | - Jan Kirschke
- Neuroradiology, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, Munich 81541, Germany
| | - Claus Zimmer
- Neuroradiology, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, Munich 81541, Germany
| | - Achim Berthele
- Neurology, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, Munich 81541, Germany
| | - Bernhard Hemmer
- Neurology, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, Munich 81541, Germany; Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Feodor-Lynen-Str. 17, Munich 81377, Germany
| | - Mark Mühlau
- Neurology, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, Munich 81541, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lerchl T, El Husseini M, Bayat A, Sekuboyina A, Hermann L, Nispel K, Baum T, Löffler MT, Senner V, Kirschke JS. Validation of a Patient-Specific Musculoskeletal Model for Lumbar Load Estimation Generated by an Automated Pipeline From Whole Body CT. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2022; 10:862804. [PMID: 35898642 PMCID: PMC9309792 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.862804] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2022] [Accepted: 05/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Chronic back pain is a major health problem worldwide. Although its causes can be diverse, biomechanical factors leading to spinal degeneration are considered a central issue. Numerical biomechanical models can identify critical factors and, thus, help predict impending spinal degeneration. However, spinal biomechanics are subject to significant interindividual variations. Therefore, in order to achieve meaningful findings on potential pathologies, predictive models have to take into account individual characteristics. To make these highly individualized models suitable for systematic studies on spinal biomechanics and clinical practice, the automation of data processing and modeling itself is inevitable. The purpose of this study was to validate an automatically generated patient-specific musculoskeletal model of the spine simulating static loading tasks. Methods: CT imaging data from two patients with non-degenerative spines were processed using an automated deep learning-based segmentation pipeline. In a semi-automated process with minimal user interaction, we generated patient-specific musculoskeletal models and simulated various static loading tasks. To validate the model, calculated vertebral loadings of the lumbar spine and muscle forces were compared with in vivo data from the literature. Finally, results from both models were compared to assess the potential of our process for interindividual analysis. Results: Calculated vertebral loads and muscle activation overall stood in close correlation with data from the literature. Compression forces normalized to upright standing deviated by a maximum of 16% for flexion and 33% for lifting tasks. Interindividual comparison of compression, as well as lateral and anterior–posterior shear forces, could be linked plausibly to individual spinal alignment and bodyweight. Conclusion: We developed a method to generate patient-specific musculoskeletal models of the lumbar spine. The models were able to calculate loads of the lumbar spine for static activities with respect to individual biomechanical properties, such as spinal alignment, bodyweight distribution, and ligament and muscle insertion points. The process is automated to a large extent, which makes it suitable for systematic investigation of spinal biomechanics in large datasets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tanja Lerchl
- Associate Professorship of Sport Equipment and Sport Materials, School of Engineering and Design, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- *Correspondence: Tanja Lerchl,
| | - Malek El Husseini
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Amirhossein Bayat
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Informatics, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Anjany Sekuboyina
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Luis Hermann
- Associate Professorship of Sport Equipment and Sport Materials, School of Engineering and Design, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Kati Nispel
- Associate Professorship of Sport Equipment and Sport Materials, School of Engineering and Design, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Thomas Baum
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Maximilian T. Löffler
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Veit Senner
- Associate Professorship of Sport Equipment and Sport Materials, School of Engineering and Design, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jan S. Kirschke
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sollmann N, Löffler MT, El Husseini M, Sekuboyina A, Dieckmeyer M, Rühling S, Zimmer C, Menze B, Joseph GB, Baum T, Kirschke JS. Automated Opportunistic Osteoporosis Screening in Routine Computed Tomography of the Spine: Comparison With Dedicated Quantitative CT. J Bone Miner Res 2022; 37:1287-1296. [PMID: 35598311 DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.4575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2021] [Revised: 05/12/2022] [Accepted: 05/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Opportunistic osteoporosis screening in nondedicated routine computed tomography (CT) is of increasing importance. The purpose of this study was to compare lumbar volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) assessed by a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based framework in routine CT to vBMD from dedicated quantitative CT (QCT), and to evaluate the ability of vBMD and surrogate measurements of Hounsfield units (HU) to distinguish between patients with and without osteoporotic vertebral fractures (VFs). A total of 144 patients (median age: 70.7 years, 93 females) with clinical routine CT (eight different CT scanners, 120 kVp or 140 kVp, with and without intravenous contrast medium) and dedicated QCT acquired within ≤30 days were included. Vertebral measurements included (i) vBMD from the CNN-based approach including automated vertebral body labeling, segmentation, and correction of the contrast media phase for routine CT data (vBMD_OPP), (ii) vBMD from dedicated QCT (vBMD_QCT), and (iii) noncalibrated HU from vertebral bodies of routine CT data as previously proposed for immanent opportunistic osteoporosis screening based on CT attenuation. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for vBMD_QCT versus vBMD_OPP indicated better agreement (ICC = 0.913) than the ICC for vBMD_QCT versus noncalibrated HU (ICC = 0.704). Bland-Altman analysis showed data points from 137 patients (95.1%) within the limits of agreement (LOA) of -23.2 to 25.0 mg/cm3 for vBMD_QCT versus vBMD_OPP. Osteoporosis (vBMD <80 mg/cm3 ) was detected in 89 patients (vBMD_QCT) and 88 patients (vBMD_OPP), whereas no patient crossed the diagnostic thresholds from normal vBMD to osteoporosis or vice versa. In a subcohort of 88 patients (thoracolumbar spine covered by imaging for VF reading), 69 patients showed one or more prevalent VFs, and the performance for discrimination between patients with and without VFs was best for vBMD_OPP (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.862; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.771-0.953). In conclusion, automated opportunistic osteoporosis screening in routine CT of various scanner setups is feasible and may demonstrate high diagnostic accuracy for prevalent VFs. © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nico Sollmann
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,TUM-Neuroimaging Center, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.,Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Maximilian T Löffler
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Malek El Husseini
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Anjany Sekuboyina
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Michael Dieckmeyer
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sebastian Rühling
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Claus Zimmer
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,TUM-Neuroimaging Center, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Bjoern Menze
- Image-Based Biomedical Modeling, Department of Informatics, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Quantitative Biomedicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Gabby B Joseph
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Thomas Baum
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jan S Kirschke
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,TUM-Neuroimaging Center, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bussas M, El Husseini M, Harabacz L, Pineker V, Grahl S, Pongratz V, Berthele A, Riederer I, Zimmer C, Hemmer B, Kirschke JS, Mühlau M. Multiple sclerosis lesions and atrophy in the spinal cord: Distribution across vertebral levels and correlation with disability. Neuroimage Clin 2022; 34:103006. [PMID: 35468568 PMCID: PMC9059154 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2022.103006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2021] [Revised: 04/09/2022] [Accepted: 04/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
In multiple sclerosis, spinal cord lesions and atrophy are measurable by whole spinal cord MRI with axial and sagittal coverage in a large patient cohort and in healthy control subjects. Spinal cord lesions and atrophy are accentuated in the cervical enlargement. They have already developed at the stage of RRMS and continue developing in a clinically meaningful way at later stages. Yet they remain largely independent.
Background The vast majority of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies on multiple sclerosis (MS) covered the spinal cord (SC), if at all, incompletely. Objective To assess SC involvement in MS, as detectable by whole SC MRI, with regard to distribution across vertebral levels and relation to clinical phenotypes and disability. Methods We investigated SC MRI with sagittal and axial coverage. Analyzed were brain and SC MRI scans of 17 healthy controls (HC) and of 370 patients with either clinically isolated syndrome (CIS, 27), relapsing remitting MS (RRMS, 303) or progressive MS (PMS, 40). Across vertebral levels, cross-sectional areas were semiautomatically segmented, and lesions manually delineated. Results The frequency of SC lesions was highest at the level C3-4. The volume of SC lesions increased from CIS to RRMS, and from RRMS to PMS whereas lesion distribution across SC levels did not differ. SC atrophy was demonstrated in RRMS and, to a higher degree, in PMS; apart from an accentuation at the level C3-4, it was evenly distributed across SC levels. SC lesions and atrophy volume were not correlated with each other and were independently associated with disability. Conclusion SC lesions and atrophy already exist at the stage of RRMS in the whole SC with an accentuation in the cervical enlargement; SC lesions and atrophy are more pronounced in the stage of PMS. Both contribute to the clinical picture but are largely independent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Bussas
- Dept. of Neurology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; TUM-Neuroimaging Center, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Malek El Husseini
- Dept. of Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Laura Harabacz
- Dept. of Neurology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Viktor Pineker
- Dept. of Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sophia Grahl
- Dept. of Neurology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; TUM-Neuroimaging Center, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Viola Pongratz
- Dept. of Neurology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; TUM-Neuroimaging Center, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Achim Berthele
- Dept. of Neurology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Isabelle Riederer
- Dept. of Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Claus Zimmer
- Dept. of Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Bernhard Hemmer
- Dept. of Neurology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, Germany
| | - Jan S Kirschke
- Dept. of Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Mark Mühlau
- Dept. of Neurology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; TUM-Neuroimaging Center, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kofler F, Ezhov I, Fidon L, Pirkl CM, Paetzold JC, Burian E, Pati S, El Husseini M, Navarro F, Shit S, Kirschke J, Bakas S, Zimmer C, Wiestler B, Menze BH. Robust, Primitive, and Unsupervised Quality Estimation for Segmentation Ensembles. Front Neurosci 2022; 15:752780. [PMID: 35035351 PMCID: PMC8757043 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.752780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2021] [Accepted: 10/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
A multitude of image-based machine learning segmentation and classification algorithms has recently been proposed, offering diagnostic decision support for the identification and characterization of glioma, Covid-19 and many other diseases. Even though these algorithms often outperform human experts in segmentation tasks, their limited reliability, and in particular the inability to detect failure cases, has hindered translation into clinical practice. To address this major shortcoming, we propose an unsupervised quality estimation method for segmentation ensembles. Our primitive solution examines discord in binary segmentation maps to automatically flag segmentation results that are particularly error-prone and therefore require special assessment by human readers. We validate our method both on segmentation of brain glioma in multi-modal magnetic resonance - and of lung lesions in computer tomography images. Additionally, our method provides an adaptive prioritization mechanism to maximize efficacy in use of human expert time by enabling radiologists to focus on the most difficult, yet important cases while maintaining full diagnostic autonomy. Our method offers an intuitive and reliable uncertainty estimation from segmentation ensembles and thereby closes an important gap toward successful translation of automatic segmentation into clinical routine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian Kofler
- Department of Informatics, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,TranslaTUM - Central Institute for Translational Cancer Research, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Ivan Ezhov
- Department of Informatics, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.,TranslaTUM - Central Institute for Translational Cancer Research, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Lucas Fidon
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Carolin M Pirkl
- Department of Informatics, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Johannes C Paetzold
- Department of Informatics, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.,TranslaTUM - Central Institute for Translational Cancer Research, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Egon Burian
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sarthak Pati
- Department of Informatics, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.,Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, PA, United States.,Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, PA, United States.,Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, PA, United States
| | - Malek El Husseini
- Department of Informatics, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Fernando Navarro
- Department of Informatics, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.,TranslaTUM - Central Institute for Translational Cancer Research, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Radio Oncology and Radiation Therapy, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Suprosanna Shit
- Department of Informatics, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.,TranslaTUM - Central Institute for Translational Cancer Research, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jan Kirschke
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Spyridon Bakas
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, PA, United States.,Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, PA, United States.,Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, PA, United States
| | - Claus Zimmer
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Benedikt Wiestler
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Bjoern H Menze
- Department of Informatics, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Quantitative Biomedicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Dieckmeyer M, Löffler MT, El Husseini M, Sekuboyina A, Menze B, Sollmann N, Wostrack M, Zimmer C, Baum T, Kirschke JS. Level-Specific Volumetric BMD Threshold Values for the Prediction of Incident Vertebral Fractures Using Opportunistic QCT: A Case-Control Study. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2022; 13:882163. [PMID: 35669688 PMCID: PMC9165054 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.882163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2022] [Accepted: 04/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To establish and evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) threshold values at different spinal levels, derived from opportunistic quantitative computed tomography (QCT), for the prediction of incident vertebral fractures (VF). MATERIALS AND METHODS In this case-control study, 35 incident VF cases (23 women, 12 men; mean age: 67 years) and 70 sex- and age-matched controls were included, based on routine multi detector CT (MDCT) scans of the thoracolumbar spine. Trabecular vBMD was measured from routine baseline CT scans of the thoracolumbar spine using an automated pipeline including vertebral segmentation, asynchronous calibration for HU-to-vBMD conversion, and correction of intravenous contrast medium (https://anduin.bonescreen.de). Threshold values at T1-L5 were calculated for the optimal operating point according to the Youden index and for fixed sensitivities (60 - 85%) in receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS vBMD at each single level of the thoracolumbar spine was significantly associated with incident VFs (odds ratio per SD decrease [OR], 95% confidence interval [CI] at T1-T4: 3.28, 1.66-6.49; at T5-T8: 3.28, 1.72-6.26; at T9-T12: 3.37, 1.78-6.36; and at L1-L4: 3.98, 1.97-8.06), independent of adjustment for age, sex, and prevalent VF. AUC showed no significant difference between vertebral levels and was highest at the thoracolumbar junction (AUC = 0.75, 95%-CI = 0.63 - 0.85 for T11-L2). Optimal threshold values increased from lumbar (L1-L4: 52.0 mg/cm³) to upper thoracic spine (T1-T4: 69.3 mg/cm³). At T11-L2, T12-L3 and L1-L4, a threshold of 80.0 mg/cm³ showed sensitivities of 85 - 88%, and specificities of 41 - 49%. To achieve comparable sensitivity (85%) at more superior spinal levels, resulting thresholds were higher: 114.1 mg/cm³ (T1-T4), 92.0 mg/cm³ (T5-T8), 88.2 mg/cm³ (T9-T12). CONCLUSIONS At all levels of the thoracolumbar spine, lower vBMD was associated with incident VFs in an elderly, predominantly oncologic patient population. Automated opportunistic osteoporosis screening of vBMD along the entire thoracolumbar spine allows for risk assessment of imminent VFs. We propose level-specific vBMD threshold at the thoracolumbar spine to identify individuals at high fracture risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Dieckmeyer
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- *Correspondence: Michael Dieckmeyer,
| | - Maximilian Thomas Löffler
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center, Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Malek El Husseini
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Anjany Sekuboyina
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Bjoern Menze
- Image-Based Biomedical Modeling, Department of Computer Science, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Quantitative Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Nico Sollmann
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- TUM-Neuroimaging Center, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Maria Wostrack
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Claus Zimmer
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Thomas Baum
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jan Stefan Kirschke
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- TUM-Neuroimaging Center, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Löffler MT, Jacob A, Scharr A, Sollmann N, Burian E, El Husseini M, Sekuboyina A, Tetteh G, Zimmer C, Gempt J, Baum T, Kirschke JS. Automatic opportunistic osteoporosis screening in routine CT: improved prediction of patients with prevalent vertebral fractures compared to DXA. Eur Radiol 2021; 31:6069-6077. [PMID: 33507353 PMCID: PMC8270840 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-07655-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2020] [Revised: 12/08/2020] [Accepted: 12/18/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Objectives To compare spinal bone measures derived from automatic and manual assessment in routine CT with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in their association with prevalent osteoporotic vertebral fractures using our fully automated framework (https://anduin.bonescreen.de) to assess various bone measures in clinical CT. Methods We included 192 patients (141 women, 51 men; age 70.2 ± 9.7 years) who had lumbar DXA and CT available (within 1 year). Automatic assessment of spinal bone measures in CT included segmentation of vertebrae using a convolutional neural network (CNN), reduction to the vertebral body, and extraction of bone mineral content (BMC), trabecular and integral volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD), and CT-based areal BMD (aBMD) using asynchronous calibration. Moreover, trabecular bone was manually sampled (manual vBMD). Results A total of 148 patients (77%) had vertebral fractures and significantly lower values in all bone measures compared to patients without fractures (p ≤ 0.001). Except for BMC, all CT-based measures performed significantly better as predictors for vertebral fractures compared to DXA (e.g., AUC = 0.885 for trabecular vBMD and AUC = 0.86 for integral vBMD vs. AUC = 0.668 for DXA aBMD, respectively; both p < 0.001). Age- and sex-adjusted associations with fracture status were strongest for manual vBMD (OR = 7.3, [95%] CI 3.8–14.3) followed by automatically assessed trabecular vBMD (OR = 6.9, CI 3.5–13.4) and integral vBMD (OR = 4.3, CI 2.5–7.6). Diagnostic cutoffs of integral vBMD for osteoporosis (< 160 mg/cm3) or low bone mass (160 ≤ BMD < 190 mg/cm3) had sensitivity (84%/41%) and specificity (78%/95%) similar to trabecular vBMD. Conclusions Fully automatic osteoporosis screening in routine CT of the spine is feasible. CT-based measures can better identify individuals with reduced bone mass who suffered from vertebral fractures than DXA. Key Points • Opportunistic osteoporosis screening of spinal bone measures derived from clinical routine CT is feasible in a fully automatic fashion using a deep learning-driven framework (https://anduin.bonescreen.de). • Manually sampled volumetric BMD (vBMD) and automatically assessed trabecular and integral vBMD were the best predictors for prevalent vertebral fractures. • Except for bone mineral content, all CT-based bone measures performed significantly better than DXA-based measures. • We introduce diagnostic thresholds of integral vBMD for osteoporosis (< 160 mg/cm3) and low bone mass (160 ≤ BMD < 190 mg/cm3) with almost equal sensitivity and specificity compared to conventional thresholds of quantitative CT as proposed by the American College of Radiology (osteoporosis < 80 mg/cm3). Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00330-020-07655-2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maximilian T Löffler
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany. .,Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.
| | - Alina Jacob
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Andreas Scharr
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Nico Sollmann
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,TUM-Neuroimaging Center, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Egon Burian
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Malek El Husseini
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Anjany Sekuboyina
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Informatics, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Giles Tetteh
- Department of Informatics, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Claus Zimmer
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jens Gempt
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Thomas Baum
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jan S Kirschke
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,TUM-Neuroimaging Center, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Sollmann N, Becherucci EA, Boehm C, Husseini ME, Ruschke S, Burian E, Kirschke JS, Link TM, Subburaj K, Karampinos DC, Krug R, Baum T, Dieckmeyer M. Texture Analysis Using CT and Chemical Shift Encoding-Based Water-Fat MRI Can Improve Differentiation Between Patients With and Without Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2021; 12:778537. [PMID: 35058878 PMCID: PMC8763669 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2021.778537] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2021] [Accepted: 12/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Osteoporosis is a highly prevalent skeletal disease that frequently entails vertebral fractures. Areal bone mineral density (BMD) derived from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the reference standard, but has well-known limitations. Texture analysis can provide surrogate markers of tissue microstructure based on computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data of the spine, thus potentially improving fracture risk estimation beyond areal BMD. However, it is largely unknown whether MRI-derived texture analysis can predict volumetric BMD (vBMD), or whether a model incorporating texture analysis based on CT and MRI may be capable of differentiating between patients with and without osteoporotic vertebral fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS Twenty-six patients (15 females, median age: 73 years, 11 patients showing at least one osteoporotic vertebral fracture) who had CT and 3-Tesla chemical shift encoding-based water-fat MRI (CSE-MRI) available were analyzed. In total, 171 vertebral bodies of the thoracolumbar spine were segmented using an automatic convolutional neural network (CNN)-based framework, followed by extraction of integral and trabecular vBMD using CT data. For CSE-MRI, manual segmentation of vertebral bodies and consecutive extraction of the mean proton density fat fraction (PDFF) and T2* was performed. First-order, second-order, and higher-order texture features were derived from texture analysis using CT and CSE-MRI data. Stepwise multivariate linear regression models were computed using integral vBMD and fracture status as dependent variables. RESULTS Patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures showed significantly lower integral and trabecular vBMD when compared to patients without fractures (p<0.001). For the model with integral vBMD as the dependent variable, T2* combined with three PDFF-based texture features explained 40% of the variance (adjusted R2[Ra2] = 0.40; p<0.001). Furthermore, regarding the differentiation between patients with and without osteoporotic vertebral fractures, a model including texture features from CT and CSE-MRI data showed better performance than a model based on integral vBMD and PDFF only ( Ra2 = 0.47 vs. Ra2 = 0.81; included texture features in the final model: integral vBMD, CT_Short-run_emphasis, CT_Varianceglobal, and PDFF_Variance). CONCLUSION Using texture analysis for spine CT and CSE-MRI can facilitate the differentiation between patients with and without osteoporotic vertebral fractures, implicating that future fracture prediction in osteoporosis may be improved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nico Sollmann
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- TUM-Neuroimaging Center, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- *Correspondence: Nico Sollmann,
| | - Edoardo A. Becherucci
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christof Boehm
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Malek El Husseini
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Stefan Ruschke
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Egon Burian
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jan S. Kirschke
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- TUM-Neuroimaging Center, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Thomas M. Link
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Karupppasamy Subburaj
- Engineering Product Development (EPD) Pillar, Singapore University of Technology and Design (SUTD), Singapore, Singapore
- Changi General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Dimitrios C. Karampinos
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Roland Krug
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Thomas Baum
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Michael Dieckmeyer
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Dieckmeyer M, Sollmann N, El Husseini M, Sekuboyina A, Löffler MT, Zimmer C, Kirschke JS, Subburaj K, Baum T. Gender-, Age- and Region-Specific Characterization of Vertebral Bone Microstructure Through Automated Segmentation and 3D Texture Analysis of Routine Abdominal CT. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2021; 12:792760. [PMID: 35154004 PMCID: PMC8828577 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2021.792760] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2021] [Accepted: 12/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To identify long-term reproducible texture features (TFs) of spinal computed tomography (CT), and characterize variations with regard to gender, age and vertebral level using our automated quantification framework. METHODS We performed texture analysis (TA) on baseline and follow-up CT (follow-up duration: 30-90 days) of 21 subjects (8 females, 13 males, age at baseline 61.2 ± 9.2 years) to determine long-term reproducibility. TFs with a long-term reproducibility error Δrel<5% were further analyzed for an association with age and vertebral level in a cohort of 376 patients (129 females, 247 males, age 62.5 ± 9.2 years). Automated analysis comprised labeling and segmentation of vertebrae into subregions using a convolutional neural network, calculation of volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) with asynchronous calibration and TF extraction. Varianceglobal measures the spread of the gray-level distribution in an image while Entropy reflects the uniformity of gray-levels. Short-run emphasis (SRE), Long-run emphasis (LRE), Run-length non-uniformity (RLN) and Run percentage (RP) contain information on consecutive voxels of a particular grey-level, or grey-level range, in a particular direction. Long runs (LRE) represent coarse texture while short runs (SRE) represent fine texture. RLN reflects similarities in the length of runs while RP reflects distribution and homogeneity of runs with a specific direction. RESULTS Six of the 24 extracted TFs had Δrel<5% (Varianceglobal, Entropy, SRE, LRE, RLN, RP), and were analyzed further in 4716 thoracolumbar vertebrae. Five TFs (Varianceglobal,SRE,LRE, RLN,RP) showed a significant difference between genders (p<0.001), potentially being caused by a finer and more directional vertebral trabecular microstructure in females compared to males. Varianceglobal and Entropy showed a significant increase from the thoracic to the lumbar spine (p<0.001), indicating a higher degree and earlier initiation of trabecular microstructure deterioration at lower spinal levels. The four higher-order TFs showed significant variations between spine regions without a clear directional gradient (p ≤ 0.001-0.012). No TF showed a clear age dependence. vBMD differed significantly between genders, age groups and spine regions (p ≤ 0.001-0.002). CONCLUSION Long-term reproducible CT-based TFs of the thoracolumbar spine were established and characterized in a predominantly older adult study population. The gender-, age- and vertebral-level-specific values may serve as foundation for osteoporosis diagnostics and facilitate future studies investigating vertebral microstructure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Dieckmeyer
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- *Correspondence: Michael Dieckmeyer,
| | - Nico Sollmann
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- TUM-Neuroimaging Center, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Malek El Husseini
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Anjany Sekuboyina
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Maximilian T. Löffler
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center, Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Claus Zimmer
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jan S. Kirschke
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- TUM-Neuroimaging Center, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Karupppasamy Subburaj
- Pillar of Engineering Product Development, Singapore University of Technology and Design, Singapore, Singapore
- Changi General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Thomas Baum
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Löffler MT, Sekuboyina A, Jacob A, Grau AL, Scharr A, El Husseini M, Kallweit M, Zimmer C, Baum T, Kirschke JS. A Vertebral Segmentation Dataset with Fracture Grading. Radiol Artif Intell 2020; 2:e190138. [PMID: 33937831 PMCID: PMC8082364 DOI: 10.1148/ryai.2020190138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2019] [Revised: 02/24/2020] [Accepted: 03/04/2020] [Indexed: 04/21/2023]
Abstract
Published under a CC BY 4.0 license. Supplemental material is available for this article.
Collapse
|