1
|
Poolman EY, Vorstermans L, Donker MH, Bijker L, Coppieters MW, Cuijpers P, Scholten-Peeters GGM, de Wit LM. How people with persistent pain experience in-person physiotherapy blended with biopsychosocial digital health - A qualitative study on participants' experiences with Back2Action. Internet Interv 2024; 36:100731. [PMID: 38465202 PMCID: PMC10924200 DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2024.100731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2023] [Revised: 02/13/2024] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 03/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Background A blended intervention consisting of in-person physiotherapy and psychologically-informed digital health, called Back2Action, was developed to optimise the management of people with persistent spinal pain who also have psychosocial risk factors associated with the development or maintenance of persistent pain. This study aimed to gain insights in how participants experienced this blended intervention. Methods A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews was conducted. Eleven people with persistent non-specific spinal pain who received the blended intervention within a randomised clinical trial were included. All interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed independently by two researchers. Data were analysed using a thematic analysis. Results The analysis identified four themes: (1) Experiencing a better understanding of the relationship between own physical and mental health; (2) Importance of the physiotherapist's active involvement in biopsychosocial blended care, which describes the crucial role of physiotherapists in supporting participants in this; (3) Appreciation of digital health, to better understand persistent pain and make meaningful lifestyle changes; and (4) Trials and triumphs, revealing gains such as better coping, but also challenges with implementation of changes into long-term routines. Conclusion Participants of the blended intervention experienced positive changes in thoughts and behaviours, which highlights the feasibility and acceptability of the blended intervention as a more holistic treatment within pain management. The differences in personal preferences for receiving psychologically-informed digital health poses challenges for implementation of blended biopsychosocial care in evidence-based practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Y Poolman
- Department of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences - Program Musculoskeletal Health, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Department of Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - L Vorstermans
- Master Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - M H Donker
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Beta Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - L Bijker
- Department of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences - Program Musculoskeletal Health, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Department of Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M W Coppieters
- Department of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences - Program Musculoskeletal Health, the Netherlands
- School of Health Sciences and Social Work, and Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Brisbane & Gold Coast, Australia
| | - P Cuijpers
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Department of Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - G G M Scholten-Peeters
- Department of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences - Program Musculoskeletal Health, the Netherlands
| | - L M de Wit
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Department of Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cuijpers P, Boyce N, van Ommeren M. Why treatment manuals of psychological interventions should be freely available. Lancet Psychiatry 2024; 11:325-326. [PMID: 38513686 DOI: 10.1016/s2215-0366(24)00071-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2024] [Revised: 03/01/2024] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 03/23/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Pim Cuijpers
- Department of Clinical, Neuro, and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1081 BT Netherlands; International Institute for Psychotherapy, Babeș-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
| | | | - Mark van Ommeren
- Department of Mental Health and Substance Use, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Harrer M, Baumeister H, Cuijpers P, Heber E, Lehr D, Kessler RC, Ebert DD. Predicting effects of a digital stress intervention for patients with depressive symptoms: Development and validation of meta-analytic prognostic models using individual participant data. J Consult Clin Psychol 2024; 92:226-235. [PMID: 38127574 DOI: 10.1037/ccp0000852] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Digital stress interventions could be helpful as an "indirect" treatment for depression, but it remains unclear for whom this is a viable option. In this study, we developed models predicting individualized benefits of a digital stress intervention on depressive symptoms at 6-month follow-up. METHOD Data of N = 1,525 patients with depressive symptoms (Center for Epidemiological Studies' Depression Scale, CES-D ≥ 16) from k = 6 randomized trials (digital stress intervention vs. waitlist) were collected. Prognostic models were developed using multilevel least absolute shrinkage and selection operator and boosting algorithms, and were validated using bootstrap bias correction and internal-external cross-validation. Subsequently, expected effects among those with and without a treatment recommendation were estimated based on clinically derived treatment assignment cut points. RESULTS Performances ranged from R² = 21.0%-23.4%, decreasing only slightly after model optimism correction (R² = 17.0%-19.6%). Predictions were greatly improved by including an interim assessment of depressive symptoms (optimism-corrected R2 = 32.6%-35.6%). Using a minimally important difference of d = -0.24 as assignment cut point, approximately 84.6%-93.3% of patients are helped by this type of intervention, while the remaining 6.7%-15.4% would experience clinically negligible benefits (δ^ = -0.02 to -0.19). Using reliable change as cut point, a smaller subset (39.3%-46.2%) with substantial expected benefits (δ^ = -0.68) receives a treatment recommendation. CONCLUSIONS Meta-analytic prognostic models applied to individual participant data can be used to predict differential benefits of a digital stress intervention as an indirect treatment for depression. While most patients seem to benefit, the developed models could be helpful as a screening tool to identify those for whom a more intensive depression treatment is needed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathias Harrer
- Department of Health Sciences, Psychology and Digital Mental Health Care, Technical University of Munich
| | - Harald Baumeister
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology and Education, Ulm University
| | - Pim Cuijpers
- Department of Clinical, Neuro, and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
| | - Elena Heber
- Get.On Institut fur Gesundheitstrainings GmbH
| | - Dirk Lehr
- Department of Health Psychology and Applied Biological Psychology, Leuphana University Luneburg
| | | | - David Daniel Ebert
- Department of Health Sciences, Psychology and Digital Mental Health Care, Technical University of Munich
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Miguel C, Cecconi J, Harrer M, van Ballegooijen W, Bhattacharya S, Karyotaki E, Cuijpers P, Gentili C, Cristea IA. Assessment of suicidality in trials of psychological interventions for depression: a meta-analysis. Lancet Psychiatry 2024; 11:252-261. [PMID: 38428438 DOI: 10.1016/s2215-0366(24)00027-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2023] [Revised: 01/09/2024] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 03/03/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Psychological interventions that are efficacious as treatments for depression could indirectly affect suicide-related outcomes. We examined suicidal thoughts and behaviours as eligibility criteria, outcomes, and adverse events across trials of psychotherapy for depression. METHODS We used a publicly available meta-analytic database developed through systematic searches (updated as of May 1, 2023) to identify randomised controlled trials in which a psychological intervention for depression was compared with an inactive or non-specific control condition in adults with depression and in which any suicide-related outcomes were reported. We also identified studies in which suicide risk was an exclusion criterion. We excluded inpatient studies and trials of unguided digital interventions or collaborative care that included a psychological component. Pairs of reviewers worked independently to select studies and extract data. In a random-effects meta-analysis with robust variance estimation, we assessed the effect of the psychological intervention on suicide outcomes in trials in which suicide was explicitly assessed as an outcome with clinical scales with established psychometric properties. Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (version 2). FINDINGS Of the 469 randomised trials we identified in which a psychological intervention was compared with an inactive control in people with depression, 251 excluded people judged at risk of suicide. Any assessment of suicide was included in only 45 trials, 12 of which assessed suicidal ideation or risk as an outcome. These 12 trials included 3930 participants, 2795 (71%) of whom were female and 1135 (29%) of whom were male; data for age and ethnicity were not consistently reported. Psychological interventions for depression were associated with a small reduction in suicidal ideation and risk in 11 trials (one trial reported only follow-up data) after the intervention (standardised mean difference -0·31 [95% CI -0·60 to -0·03]) but not at follow-up (-0·49 [-1·31 to 0·32]). Suicide-related adverse events were reported in 25 trials, and suicide-related serious adverse events (eg, suicide attempts, deaths by suicide) were reported in 13 trials. Heterogeneity was substantial across all analyses, and prediction intervals crossed zero. INTERPRETATION Trials of psychological interventions for depression rarely report assessments of suicide. Psychological interventions might reduce suicidal ideation in patients with depression, but more randomised controlled trials are required to clarify this effect. Monitoring and reporting of suicide-related adverse events should be improved in trials of psychological interventions for depression, and future trials should incorporate outcomes related to suicidal thoughts or behaviours. FUNDING None. TRANSLATION For the Spanish translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clara Miguel
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Jessica Cecconi
- Department of General Psychology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Mathias Harrer
- Psychology & Digital Mental Health Care, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Wouter van Ballegooijen
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Shalini Bhattacharya
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Eirini Karyotaki
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Pim Cuijpers
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Claudio Gentili
- Department of General Psychology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Ioana A Cristea
- Department of General Psychology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Koumoula A, Marchionatti LE, Karagiorga VE, Schafer JL, Simioni A, Caye A, Serdari A, Kotsis K, Basta M, Athanasopoulou L, Dafoulis V, Tatsiopoulou P, Zilikis N, Vergouli E, Balikou P, Kapsimalli E, Mitropoulou A, Tzotzi A, Klavdianou N, Zeleni D, Mitroulaki S, Botzaki A, Gerostergios G, Samiotakis G, Moschos G, Giannopoulou I, Papanikolaou K, Angeli K, Scarmeas N, Emanuele J, Schuster K, Karyotaki E, Kalikow L, Pronoiti K, Merikangas KR, Szatmari P, Cuijpers P, Georgiades K, Milham MP, Corcoran M, Burke S, Koplewicz H, Salum GA. Understanding priorities and needs for child and adolescent mental health in Greece from multiple informants: an open resource dataset. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2024:10.1007/s00787-024-02400-2. [PMID: 38558204 DOI: 10.1007/s00787-024-02400-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2023] [Accepted: 02/15/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
The Child and Adolescent Mental Health Initiative (CAMHI) aims to enhance mental health care capacity for children and adolescents across Greece. Considering the need for evidence-based policy, the program developed an open-resource dataset for researching the field within the country. A comprehensive, mixed-method, community-based research was conducted in 2022/2023 assessing the current state, needs, barriers, and opportunities according to multiple viewpoints. We surveyed geographically distributed samples of 1,756 caregivers, 1,201 children/adolescents, 404 schoolteachers, and 475 health professionals using validated instruments to assess mental health symptoms, mental health needs, literacy and stigma, service use and access, professional practices, training background, and training needs and preferences. Fourteen focus groups were conducted with informants from diverse populations (including underrepresented minorities) to reach an in-depth understanding of those topics. A dataset with quantitative and qualitative findings is now available for researchers, policymakers, and society [ https://osf.io/crz6h/ and https://rpubs.com/camhi/sdashboard ]. This resource offers valuable data for assessing the needs and priorities for child and adolescent mental health care in Greece. It is now freely available to consult, and is expected to inform upcoming research and evidence-based professional training. This initiative may inspire similar ones in other countries, informing methodological strategies for researching mental health needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anastasia Koumoula
- Child and Adolescent Mental Health Initiative (CAMHI), Stavros Niarchos Foundation & Child Mind Institute, 101 E 56th St, New York, NY, 10022, USA
| | - Lauro Estivalete Marchionatti
- Child and Adolescent Mental Health Initiative (CAMHI), Stavros Niarchos Foundation & Child Mind Institute, 101 E 56th St, New York, NY, 10022, USA
- Child Mind Institute, 101 E 56th St, New York, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Universidade Federal Do Rio Grande Do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Vasiliki Eirini Karagiorga
- Child and Adolescent Mental Health Initiative (CAMHI), Stavros Niarchos Foundation & Child Mind Institute, 101 E 56th St, New York, NY, 10022, USA
- Child Mind Institute, 101 E 56th St, New York, USA
| | - Julia Luiza Schafer
- Child and Adolescent Mental Health Initiative (CAMHI), Stavros Niarchos Foundation & Child Mind Institute, 101 E 56th St, New York, NY, 10022, USA
- Child Mind Institute, 101 E 56th St, New York, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Universidade Federal Do Rio Grande Do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - André Simioni
- Child and Adolescent Mental Health Initiative (CAMHI), Stavros Niarchos Foundation & Child Mind Institute, 101 E 56th St, New York, NY, 10022, USA
- Child Mind Institute, 101 E 56th St, New York, USA
| | - Arthur Caye
- Child and Adolescent Mental Health Initiative (CAMHI), Stavros Niarchos Foundation & Child Mind Institute, 101 E 56th St, New York, NY, 10022, USA
- Child Mind Institute, 101 E 56th St, New York, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Universidade Federal Do Rio Grande Do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Aspasia Serdari
- Child and Adolescent Mental Health Initiative (CAMHI), Stavros Niarchos Foundation & Child Mind Institute, 101 E 56th St, New York, NY, 10022, USA
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Medical School, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece
| | - Konstantinos Kotsis
- Child and Adolescent Mental Health Initiative (CAMHI), Stavros Niarchos Foundation & Child Mind Institute, 101 E 56th St, New York, NY, 10022, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Maria Basta
- Child and Adolescent Mental Health Initiative (CAMHI), Stavros Niarchos Foundation & Child Mind Institute, 101 E 56th St, New York, NY, 10022, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, University Hospital of Heraklion, Crete, Greece
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University Hospital of Heraklion, Crete, Greece
| | - Lilian Athanasopoulou
- Child and Adolescent Mental Health Initiative (CAMHI), Stavros Niarchos Foundation & Child Mind Institute, 101 E 56th St, New York, NY, 10022, USA
| | - Vaios Dafoulis
- Child and Adolescent Mental Health Initiative (CAMHI), Stavros Niarchos Foundation & Child Mind Institute, 101 E 56th St, New York, NY, 10022, USA
| | - Paraskevi Tatsiopoulou
- Child and Adolescent Mental Health Initiative (CAMHI), Stavros Niarchos Foundation & Child Mind Institute, 101 E 56th St, New York, NY, 10022, USA
| | - Nikos Zilikis
- Child and Adolescent Mental Health Initiative (CAMHI), Stavros Niarchos Foundation & Child Mind Institute, 101 E 56th St, New York, NY, 10022, USA
| | - Evangelia Vergouli
- Child and Adolescent Mental Health Initiative (CAMHI), Stavros Niarchos Foundation & Child Mind Institute, 101 E 56th St, New York, NY, 10022, USA
| | - Panagiota Balikou
- Child and Adolescent Mental Health Initiative (CAMHI), Stavros Niarchos Foundation & Child Mind Institute, 101 E 56th St, New York, NY, 10022, USA
| | - Efstathia Kapsimalli
- Child and Adolescent Mental Health Initiative (CAMHI), Stavros Niarchos Foundation & Child Mind Institute, 101 E 56th St, New York, NY, 10022, USA
| | - Andromachi Mitropoulou
- Child and Adolescent Mental Health Initiative (CAMHI), Stavros Niarchos Foundation & Child Mind Institute, 101 E 56th St, New York, NY, 10022, USA
| | - Alexandra Tzotzi
- Child and Adolescent Mental Health Initiative (CAMHI), Stavros Niarchos Foundation & Child Mind Institute, 101 E 56th St, New York, NY, 10022, USA
| | - Nikanthi Klavdianou
- Child and Adolescent Mental Health Initiative (CAMHI), Stavros Niarchos Foundation & Child Mind Institute, 101 E 56th St, New York, NY, 10022, USA
| | - Domna Zeleni
- Child and Adolescent Mental Health Initiative (CAMHI), Stavros Niarchos Foundation & Child Mind Institute, 101 E 56th St, New York, NY, 10022, USA
| | - Sotiria Mitroulaki
- Child and Adolescent Mental Health Initiative (CAMHI), Stavros Niarchos Foundation & Child Mind Institute, 101 E 56th St, New York, NY, 10022, USA
| | - Anna Botzaki
- Child and Adolescent Mental Health Initiative (CAMHI), Stavros Niarchos Foundation & Child Mind Institute, 101 E 56th St, New York, NY, 10022, USA
| | - Giorgos Gerostergios
- Child and Adolescent Mental Health Initiative (CAMHI), Stavros Niarchos Foundation & Child Mind Institute, 101 E 56th St, New York, NY, 10022, USA
| | - Giorgos Samiotakis
- Child and Adolescent Mental Health Initiative (CAMHI), Stavros Niarchos Foundation & Child Mind Institute, 101 E 56th St, New York, NY, 10022, USA
| | - Giorgos Moschos
- Child and Adolescent Mental Health Initiative (CAMHI), Stavros Niarchos Foundation & Child Mind Institute, 101 E 56th St, New York, NY, 10022, USA
| | - Ioanna Giannopoulou
- Child and Adolescent Mental Health Initiative (CAMHI), Stavros Niarchos Foundation & Child Mind Institute, 101 E 56th St, New York, NY, 10022, USA
- 2nd Department of Psychiatry, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Katerina Papanikolaou
- Child and Adolescent Mental Health Initiative (CAMHI), Stavros Niarchos Foundation & Child Mind Institute, 101 E 56th St, New York, NY, 10022, USA
- Department of Child Psychiatry, Agia Sophia Children's Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Katerina Angeli
- Child and Adolescent Mental Health Initiative (CAMHI), Stavros Niarchos Foundation & Child Mind Institute, 101 E 56th St, New York, NY, 10022, USA
| | - Nikolaos Scarmeas
- National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (NKUA), Athens, Greece
- Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jill Emanuele
- Child and Adolescent Mental Health Initiative (CAMHI), Stavros Niarchos Foundation & Child Mind Institute, 101 E 56th St, New York, NY, 10022, USA
- Child Mind Institute, 101 E 56th St, New York, USA
| | - Kenneth Schuster
- Child and Adolescent Mental Health Initiative (CAMHI), Stavros Niarchos Foundation & Child Mind Institute, 101 E 56th St, New York, NY, 10022, USA
- Child Mind Institute, 101 E 56th St, New York, USA
| | - Eirini Karyotaki
- Child and Adolescent Mental Health Initiative (CAMHI), Stavros Niarchos Foundation & Child Mind Institute, 101 E 56th St, New York, NY, 10022, USA
- Department of Clinical Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lily Kalikow
- Child and Adolescent Mental Health Initiative (CAMHI), Stavros Niarchos Foundation & Child Mind Institute, 101 E 56th St, New York, NY, 10022, USA
| | - Katerina Pronoiti
- Child and Adolescent Mental Health Initiative (CAMHI), Stavros Niarchos Foundation & Child Mind Institute, 101 E 56th St, New York, NY, 10022, USA
| | - Kathleen R Merikangas
- Genetic Epidemiology Research Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, Bathesda, USA
| | - Peter Szatmari
- Cundill Centre for Child and Youth Depression, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Pim Cuijpers
- Department of Clinical Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Katholiki Georgiades
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences & Offord Centre for Child Studies, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Michael P Milham
- Child and Adolescent Mental Health Initiative (CAMHI), Stavros Niarchos Foundation & Child Mind Institute, 101 E 56th St, New York, NY, 10022, USA
- Child Mind Institute, 101 E 56th St, New York, USA
| | - Mimi Corcoran
- Child and Adolescent Mental Health Initiative (CAMHI), Stavros Niarchos Foundation & Child Mind Institute, 101 E 56th St, New York, NY, 10022, USA
- Child Mind Institute, 101 E 56th St, New York, USA
| | - Sarah Burke
- Child and Adolescent Mental Health Initiative (CAMHI), Stavros Niarchos Foundation & Child Mind Institute, 101 E 56th St, New York, NY, 10022, USA
- Child Mind Institute, 101 E 56th St, New York, USA
| | - Harold Koplewicz
- Child and Adolescent Mental Health Initiative (CAMHI), Stavros Niarchos Foundation & Child Mind Institute, 101 E 56th St, New York, NY, 10022, USA
- Child Mind Institute, 101 E 56th St, New York, USA
| | - Giovanni Abrahão Salum
- Child and Adolescent Mental Health Initiative (CAMHI), Stavros Niarchos Foundation & Child Mind Institute, 101 E 56th St, New York, NY, 10022, USA.
- Child Mind Institute, 101 E 56th St, New York, USA.
- Department of Psychiatry, Universidade Federal Do Rio Grande Do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wang Y, Amarnath A, Miguel C, Ciharova M, Lin J, Zhao R, Struijs SY, de Wit LM, Toffolo MBJ, Cuijpers P. The effectiveness of unguided self-help psychological interventions for obsessive-compulsive disorder: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Compr Psychiatry 2024; 130:152453. [PMID: 38290294 DOI: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2024.152453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2023] [Revised: 12/19/2023] [Accepted: 01/19/2024] [Indexed: 02/01/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence-based psychological interventions exist for individuals with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), but many individuals with OCD are unable to access them because of barriers, such as geographical isolation, treatment cost, and stigma etc. Unguided self-help psychological intervention has emerged as a potential solution to this problem. However, there is limited research on its overall effectiveness. This study aimed to address this gap. METHODS Comprehensive searches from inception to 1st Jan 2023 were conducted in both international (PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, International clinical trials registry platform of WHO) and Chinese (China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WeiPu, WanFang, Chinese Clinical Trial Registry) databases. The registered protocol is accessible at https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/FKB5W. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing unguided self-help psychological interventions to control groups for individuals with OCD. The primary outcome was OCD symptom severity, with Hedges' g calculated post-intervention. Heterogeneity was deemed to be low, moderate, and high if the I2 value was quantified 25%, 50%, and 75% respectively. Relative Risks (RRs) was calculated for dropout rates post-intervention. Random-effects models were used for all analyses. RESULTS 12 RCTs comparing unguided self-help psychological interventions to control groups were identified, with a total of 20 comparisons and 769 OCD patients. Overall, unguided self-help psychological interventions demonstrated a significant moderate effect on reducing OCD symptom severity (g = -0.42; 95% CI [-0.69; -0.14]) compared to control groups, with a moderate heterogeneity (I2 = 59%; 95% CI [22.73; 78.38]). This finding remained significant in sensitivity analyses for the self-rated Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS; k = 7, g = -0.46; 95% CI [-0.71; -0.2]) and after removing an outlier (g = -0.37; 95% CI [-0.55; -0.19]), but not for the clinician-rated Y-BOCS (k = 4, g = -0.78; 95% CI [-2.75; 1.19]) and Obsessive Compulsive Inventory-Revised (k = 6, g = -0.26; 95% CI [-0.53; 0]). Subgroup analyses revealed a significant difference in effect size between studies conducting intention-to-treat and completers-only analyses (p = .01). The completers-only analyses demonstrated a moderate significant effect (g = -0.65; 95% CI [-1.08; -0.21]), whereas the effect of the intention-to-treat analyses was not significant (g = -0.18; 95% CI [-0.36; 0]). Participants in the unguided self-help groups exhibited a significantly higher dropout rate (RR = 2.08; 95% CI [1.53; 2.81]) compared to control groups. Furthermore, participants recruited from the community had a higher likelihood of dropping out compared to those recruited from clinical settings (p < .001). Additionally, participants who received cognitive-behavioural therapy intervention were more likely to drop out than those who received other types of intervention (p < .001). Most trials (92%) were rated at a high risk of bias. CONCLUSION Unguided self-help psychological interventions demonstrate potential effectiveness in alleviating OCD symptom severity post-intervention. However, caution should be exercised when interpreting the results due to high risk of bias across trials and the relatively small sample size. And the considerable dropout rate might hinder treatment effects. Future studies with strict methodology should investigate the long-term effectiveness of unguided self-help psychological interventions for OCD, explore the reasons for high dropout rates, and improve intervention adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yingying Wang
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Arpana Amarnath
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Clara Miguel
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marketa Ciharova
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jingyuan Lin
- The Institute of Brain and Psychological Science, Sichuan Normal University, China
| | - Ruiying Zhao
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sascha Y Struijs
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Leonore M de Wit
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marieke B J Toffolo
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Pim Cuijpers
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Babeș-Bolyai University, International Institute for Psychotherapy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cuijpers P, Miguel C, Ciharova M, Harrer M, Karyotaki E. Non-directive supportive therapy for depression: A meta-analytic review. J Affect Disord 2024; 349:452-461. [PMID: 38211757 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.01.073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2023] [Revised: 12/24/2023] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 01/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Non-directive supportive therapy (NDST) is an important treatment of adult depression, but no recent meta-analysis has integrated the randomized trials examining its effects. METHODS We conducted a meta-analysis comparing NDST to control conditions and to other therapies, by using an existing database of randomized trials of psychological treatments of depression in adults. This database was built through searches in PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase and the Cochrane Library. RESULTS 48 randomized controlled trials (5075 participants), with 20 comparisons between NDST and a control group and 49 comparisons between NDST and another psychotherapy were included. Random effects meta-analyses found an effect size of NDST compared with control conditions of g = 0.53 (95 % CI, 0.34; 0.72) with moderate heterogeneity (I2 = 51; 95 % CI: 18; 71; PI = -0.02 to 1.09). NDST was less effective than other therapies (g = -0.21; 95 % CI: -0.31; -0.11). The difference with other therapies was significantly larger in studies in which NDST was used as a control group (p = .003). There was no significant difference between NDST and other therapies in which NDST was not used as a control group (k = 14; g = -0.05; 95 % CI: -0.17; 0.07). CONCLUSIONS NDST probably is an effective treatment of depression. The effects may be somewhat smaller than those of other therapies, but that may also be an artefact, because NDST is often used as a control group and may be designed as an "intent-to-fail" intervention in some studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pim Cuijpers
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Babeș-Bolyai University, International Institute for Psychotherapy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
| | - Clara Miguel
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marketa Ciharova
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mathias Harrer
- Psychology & Digital Mental Health Care, Department of Health Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Eirini Karyotaki
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Thielecke J, Kuper P, Lehr D, Schuurmans L, Harrer M, Ebert DD, Cuijpers P, Behrendt D, Brückner H, Horvath H, Riper H, Buntrock C. Who benefits from indirect prevention and treatment of depression using an online intervention for insomnia? Results from an individual-participant data meta-analysis. Psychol Med 2024:1-14. [PMID: 38469832 DOI: 10.1017/s0033291724000527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Major depressive disorder (MDD) is highly prevalent and burdensome for individuals and society. While there are psychological interventions able to prevent and treat MDD, uptake remains low. To overcome structural and attitudinal barriers, an indirect approach of using online insomnia interventions seems promising because insomnia is less stigmatized, predicts MDD onset, is often comorbid and can outlast MDD treatment. This individual-participant-data meta-analysis evaluated the potential of the online insomnia intervention GET.ON Recovery as an indirect treatment to reduce depressive symptom severity (DSS) and potential MDD onset across a range of participant characteristics. METHODS Efficacy on depressive symptom outcomes was evaluated using multilevel regression models controlling for baseline severity. To identify potential effect moderators, clinical, sociodemographic, and work-related variables were investigated using univariable moderation and random-forest methodology before developing a multivariable decision tree. RESULTS IPD were obtained from four of seven eligible studies (N = 561); concentrating on workers with high work-stress. DSS was significantly lower in the intervention group both at post-assessment (d = -0.71 [95% CI-0.92 to -0.51]) and at follow-up (d = -0.84 [95% CI -1.11 to -0.57]). In the subsample (n = 121) without potential MDD at baseline, there were no significant group differences in onset of potential MDD. Moderation analyses revealed that effects on DSS differed significantly across baseline severity groups with effect sizes between d = -0.48 and -0.87 (post) and d = - 0.66 to -0.99 (follow-up), while no other sociodemographic, clinical, or work-related characteristics were significant moderators. CONCLUSIONS An online insomnia intervention is a promising approach to effectively reduce DSS in a preventive and treatment setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janika Thielecke
- Department of Sports and Health Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
- Unit Healthy Living & Work, TNO (The Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research), Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Paula Kuper
- Department of Sports and Health Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Institute of Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Faculty of Medicine, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Dirk Lehr
- Department of Health Psychology and Applied Biological Psychology, Institute for Sustainability, Education & Psychology, Leuphana University Luneburg, Luneburg, Germany
| | - Lea Schuurmans
- Department of Sports and Health Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Mathias Harrer
- Department of Sports and Health Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- GET.ON Institute for Online Health Trainings GmbH, Berlin, Germany
| | - David D Ebert
- Department of Sports and Health Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Pim Cuijpers
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, VU University, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Dörte Behrendt
- Department of Health Psychology and Applied Biological Psychology, Institute for Sustainability, Education & Psychology, Leuphana University Luneburg, Luneburg, Germany
| | - Hanna Brückner
- Department of Health Psychology and Applied Biological Psychology, Institute for Sustainability, Education & Psychology, Leuphana University Luneburg, Luneburg, Germany
| | - Hanne Horvath
- GET.ON Institute for Online Health Trainings GmbH, Berlin, Germany
| | - Heleen Riper
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, VU University, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Department of Psychiatry, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Claudia Buntrock
- Institute of Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Faculty of Medicine, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cuijpers P, Furukawa TA, Noma H. Correction to: One in five, not one in 17, youth patients deteriorate during psychotherapy for depression: Reply. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2024; 33:951. [PMID: 35288802 DOI: 10.1007/s00787-022-01968-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Pim Cuijpers
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit, Van der Boechorststraat 7-9, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Toshi A Furukawa
- Department of Health Promotion and Human Behavior, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine/School of Public Health, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Hisashi Noma
- Department of Data Science, Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Papola D, Miguel C, Mazzaglia M, Franco P, Tedeschi F, Romero SA, Patel AR, Ostuzzi G, Gastaldon C, Karyotaki E, Harrer M, Purgato M, Sijbrandij M, Patel V, Furukawa TA, Cuijpers P, Barbui C. Psychotherapies for Generalized Anxiety Disorder in Adults: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. JAMA Psychiatry 2024; 81:250-259. [PMID: 37851421 PMCID: PMC10585589 DOI: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2023.3971] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2023] [Accepted: 08/02/2023] [Indexed: 10/19/2023]
Abstract
Importance Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is one of the most common mental disorders in adults. Psychotherapies are among the most recommended treatments for GAD, but which should be considered as first-line treatment needs to be clarified. Objective To use a network meta-analysis to examine the short- and long-term associations of different psychotherapies with outcomes of effectiveness and acceptability in adults with GAD. Data Sources MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials were searched from database inception to January 1, 2023, to identify randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of psychotherapies for adults with GAD. Study Selection RCTs comparing any type of psychotherapy against another or with a control condition for the treatment of adults (≥18 years, both sexes) with a primary diagnosis of GAD were eligible for inclusion. Data Extraction and Synthesis This study followed Cochrane standards for extracting data and assessing data quality and used the PRISMA guideline for reporting. Risk of bias of individual studies was assessed using the second version of the Cochrane risk of bias tool, and the Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis was used to rate the certainty of evidence for meta-analytical results. Main Outcomes and Measures Eight psychotherapies were compared against one another and with 2 control conditions. Primary outcomes were severity of GAD symptoms and acceptability of the psychotherapies. Random-effects model pairwise and network meta-analyses were conducted. For effectiveness, standardized mean differences (SMDs) were pooled, and for acceptability, relative risks with 95% CIs were calculated. Results Data from 65 RCTs were included. Effect size estimates on data from 5048 participants (mean [SD], 70.9% [11.9%] women; mean [SD] age, 42.2 [12.5] years) suggested that third-wave cognitive behavior therapies (CBTs) (SMD, -0.76 [95% CI, -1.15 to -0.36]; certainty, moderate), CBT (SMD, -0.74 [95% CI, -1.09 to -0.38]; certainty, moderate), and relaxation therapy (SMD, -0.59 [95% CI, -1.07 to -0.11]; certainty, low) were associated with reduced GAD symptoms vs treatment as usual. Relative risks for all-cause discontinuation (indication of acceptability) signaled no differences compared with treatment as usual for all psychotherapies (eg, relative risk, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.64-1.67] for CBT vs treatment as usual). When excluding studies at high risk of bias, relaxation therapy lost its superiority over treatment as usual (SMD, -0.47; 95% CI, -1.18 to 0.23). When considering anxiety severity at 3 to 12 months after completion of the intervention, only CBT remained significantly associated with greater effectiveness than treatment as usual (SMD, -0.60; 95% CI, -0.99 to -0.21). Conclusions and Relevance Given the evidence in this systematic review and network meta-analysis for its associations with both acute and long-term effectiveness, CBT may represent the first-line therapy of GAD. Third-wave CBTs and relaxation therapy were associated with short-term effectiveness and may also be offered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Davide Papola
- Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Mental Health and Service Evaluation, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
- Section of Psychiatry, Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Clara Miguel
- Section of Clinical Psychology, Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mariacristina Mazzaglia
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Mental Health and Service Evaluation, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
- Section of Psychiatry, Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Pamela Franco
- Department of Psychology, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
- Millennium Institute for Research in Depression and Personality (MIDAP), Santiago, Chile
| | - Federico Tedeschi
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Mental Health and Service Evaluation, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
- Section of Psychiatry, Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Sara A. Romero
- Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Anushka R. Patel
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Giovanni Ostuzzi
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Mental Health and Service Evaluation, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
- Section of Psychiatry, Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Chiara Gastaldon
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Mental Health and Service Evaluation, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
- Section of Psychiatry, Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Eirini Karyotaki
- Section of Clinical Psychology, Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mathias Harrer
- Psychology & Digital Mental Health Care, Department of Health Sciences, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Marianna Purgato
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Mental Health and Service Evaluation, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
- Section of Psychiatry, Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Marit Sijbrandij
- Section of Clinical Psychology, Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Vikram Patel
- Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Toshi A. Furukawa
- Department of Health Promotion and Human Behavior, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine/School of Public Health, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Pim Cuijpers
- Section of Clinical Psychology, Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Corrado Barbui
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Mental Health and Service Evaluation, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
- Section of Psychiatry, Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Fernández-Buendía S, Cuijpers P, Grimaldos J, Díaz-García A, Palau-Batet M, Quero S. A blended intervention for adjustment disorder: Study protocol for a feasibility trial. Internet Interv 2024; 35:100715. [PMID: 38313142 PMCID: PMC10837064 DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2024.100715] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2023] [Revised: 01/09/2024] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 02/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Adjustment disorder (AjD) is a maladaptive response to one or more psychosocial stressors. In many cases, the symptomatology of this disorder disappears once the stressor or its consequences are no longer present. However, in some cases, if left untreated, the symptoms may worsen and develop into a more severe mental disorder. In this regard, different authors propose that a low-intensity intervention may be suitable for this disorder. Previous studies with other mental disorders and with patients with AjD found that blended interventions can be a viable and effective option. The aim of this study is to analyze the feasibility (the participants' expectations and preferences, the satisfaction and acceptance, the appropriateness of different methods of recruitment and data collection, and the reasons for dropping out) of a blended cognitive-behavioral intervention (CBT) for AjD that combines the use of a self-applied Internet-based program with videoconference sessions with a therapist. As a secondary objective, the potential efficacy of this intervention will be tested. Method and analysis A feasibility trial with a single-group and open-trial design will be conducted. A total of 41 participants will be assigned to the single treatment group. All the participants will be assessed for eligibility and respond at four measurement points: pre-treatment, post-treatment, and 3- and 12-month follow-ups. The treatment combines the use of an Internet-based intervention through a web platform with videoconference sessions with a therapist every 10-12 days. The intervention contains seven modules and is based on CBT. The main outcome measures are related to the feasibility of the intervention (adherence, treatment satisfaction and expectations, participants' opinions, preferences, therapeutic alliance, and usability). Clinical measures will also be assessed. Discussion To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to test a blended intervention for AjD in the Spanish language. We expect this intervention to be feasible, and that a future Randomized Controlled Trial will be able to show its efficacy. Potential limitations include difficulties in recruiting the sample, failures in the computer systems, or a high dropout rate. Measures have been taken to try to reduce the impact of these limitations. This study received the approval of the Ethics committee of Universitat Jaume I in March 2022 (CD/42/2022). Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05464121. Registered 19 July 2022, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05464121.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Fernández-Buendía
- Department of Basic, Clinical Psychology and Psychobiology, Universitat Jaume I, Castellón, Spain
| | - Pim Cuijpers
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jorge Grimaldos
- Department of Basic, Clinical Psychology and Psychobiology, Universitat Jaume I, Castellón, Spain
| | - Amanda Díaz-García
- Department of Psychology and Sociology, Universidad de Zaragoza (Campus de Teruel), Teruel, Spain
| | - María Palau-Batet
- Department of Basic, Clinical Psychology and Psychobiology, Universitat Jaume I, Castellón, Spain
| | - Soledad Quero
- Department of Basic, Clinical Psychology and Psychobiology, Universitat Jaume I, Castellón, Spain
- CIBER de Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBEROBN), Instituto Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Fuhrmann LM, Weisel KK, Harrer M, Kulke JK, Baumeister H, Cuijpers P, Ebert DD, Berking M. Additive effects of adjunctive app-based interventions for mental disorders - A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Internet Interv 2024; 35:100703. [PMID: 38225971 PMCID: PMC10788289 DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2023.100703] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2023] [Revised: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 12/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/17/2024] Open
Abstract
Background It is uncertain whether app-based interventions add value to existing mental health care. Objective To examine the incremental effects of app-based interventions when used as adjunct to mental health interventions. Methods We searched PubMed, PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases on September 15th, 2023, for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on mental health interventions with an adjunct app-based intervention compared to the same intervention-only arm for adults with mental disorders or respective clinically relevant symptomatology. We conducted meta-analyses on symptoms of different mental disorders at postintervention. PROSPERO, CRD42018098545. Results We identified 46 RCTs (4869 participants). Thirty-two adjunctive app-based interventions passively or actively monitored symptoms and behaviour, and in 13 interventions, the monitored data were sent to a therapist. We found additive effects on symptoms of depression (g = 0.17; 95 % CI 0.02 to 0.33; k = 7 comparisons), anxiety (g = 0.80; 95 % CI 0.06 to 1.54; k = 3), mania (g = 0.2; 95 % CI 0.02 to 0.38; k = 4), smoking cessation (g = 0.43; 95 % CI 0.29 to 0.58; k = 10), and alcohol use (g = 0.23; 95 % CI 0.08 to 0.39; k = 7). No significant effects were found on symptoms of depression within a bipolar disorder (g = -0.07; 95 % CI -0.37 to 0.23, k = 4) and eating disorders (g = -0.02; 95 % CI -0.44 to 0.4, k = 3). Studies on depression, mania, smoking, and alcohol use had a low heterogeneity between the trials. For other mental disorders, only single studies were identified. Only ten studies had a low risk of bias, and 25 studies reported insufficient statistical power. Discussion App-based interventions may be used to enhance mental health interventions to further reduce symptoms of depression, anxiety, mania, smoking, and alcohol use. However, the effects were small, except for anxiety, and limited due to study quality. Further high-quality research with larger sample sizes is warranted to better understand how app-based interventions can be most effectively combined with established interventions to improve outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lukas M. Fuhrmann
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Kiona K. Weisel
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Mathias Harrer
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
- Department of Psychology and Digital Mental Health Care, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jennifer K. Kulke
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
- Department of Psychology and Digital Mental Health Care, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Harald Baumeister
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Pim Cuijpers
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - David D. Ebert
- Department of Psychology and Digital Mental Health Care, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Matthias Berking
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Fernández-Buendía S, Miguel C, Dumarkaite A, Kazlauskas E, Cuijpers P, Quero S. Technology-supported treatments for adjustment disorder: A systematic review and preliminary meta-analysis. J Affect Disord 2024; 347:29-38. [PMID: 37992766 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.11.059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2023] [Revised: 10/21/2023] [Accepted: 11/17/2023] [Indexed: 11/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of technology in psychological treatments can bring evidence-based interventions closer to more people using fewer resources. The aim of this systematic review and preliminary meta-analysis was to summarize all the available information about technology-supported psychological treatments for Adjustment Disorder (AjD) patients of all ages. METHOD Eligibility criteria included studies that tested a technology-supported treatment in patients with AjD and reported data on a mental health outcome. Case studies and case series were excluded. Searches were conducted in the PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and PsycINFO databases. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2.0. tool for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) and the NHLBI tool for pre-post studies. RESULTS Nine articles (8 RCTs and 1 pre-post study) were included, eight that tested computerised interventions and two that used virtual reality. The meta-analysis showed the superior efficacy of the intervention groups compared to control conditions in reducing mental health symptomatology and a significant improvement between pre- and post-treatment. LIMITATIONS The small number of studies included and the high heterogeneity among them were two of the main limitations. CONCLUSIONS These results are similar to those observed in previous systematic reviews on technology-supported treatments for other mental disorders and suggest that these interventions could be effective for patients with AjD. However, further research is needed to determine the advantages and disadvantages of these interventions for the treatment of AjD in different age populations such as children, adolescents or older adults, as well as effective means for improving treatment retention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Fernández-Buendía
- Department of Basic, Clinical Psychology and Psychobiology, Universitat Jaume I, Castellón, Spain.
| | - Clara Miguel
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Austeja Dumarkaite
- Center for Psychotraumatology, Institute of Psychology, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Evaldas Kazlauskas
- Center for Psychotraumatology, Institute of Psychology, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
| | - Pim Cuijpers
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Soledad Quero
- Department of Basic, Clinical Psychology and Psychobiology, Universitat Jaume I, Castellón, Spain; CIBER de Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBEROBN), Madrid, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lin J, Zhao R, Li H, Lei Y, Cuijpers P. Looking back on life: An updated meta-analysis of the effect of life review therapy and reminiscence on late-life depression. J Affect Disord 2024; 347:163-174. [PMID: 37995927 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.11.050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2023] [Revised: 11/07/2023] [Accepted: 11/17/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Twenty years ago, we confirmed the effectiveness of life review therapy and reminiscence (LRT-REM) to treat late-life depression in a meta-analysis. In the current study, we aimed to examine the most updated evidence on the effects of LRT-REM in older adults with depression. METHODS We systematically searched records in English and Chinese databases up to December 2022 and included randomized controlled studies comparing LRT-REM with control conditions in older adults with depression. Outcomes included depression, anxiety, quality of life, and life satisfaction. Effect sizes (Hedges' g) at post-treatment were pooled with random effects meta-analyses. RESULTS 42 studies with 3361 depressed older adults (≥60 years) met the selection criteria. We found a significant and large effect of LRT-REM (g = 1.41, p < 0.001) on late-life depression, corresponding to a number-needed-to-treat (NNT) of 1.98. Heterogeneity shrunk from high (I2 = 86.78) to moderate (I2 = 46.87) after excluding eight detected outliers. There were no significant differences between the examined subgroups except for the type of control condition. The effects of LRT-REM were not statistically significant at follow-up when corrected for publication bias. The quality of many included studies was not optimal. LIMITATIONS The quality of many included studies was not optimal, with a high risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS LRT-REM may be effective for treating late-life depression, but long-term effects are unclear. More research is needed on the effects of LRT-REM, especially when guided by (para)professional or lay therapists in low- and middle-income countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingyuan Lin
- The Institute of Brain and Psychological Science, Sichuan Normal University, China
| | - Ruiying Zhao
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Hong Li
- The Institute of Brain and Psychological Science, Sichuan Normal University, China; School of Psychology, South China Normal University, China
| | - Yi Lei
- The Institute of Brain and Psychological Science, Sichuan Normal University, China.
| | - Pim Cuijpers
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Schoenberger SF, Schönenberg K, Fuhr DC, Nesterko Y, Glaesmer H, Sondorp E, Woodward A, Sijbrandij M, Cuijpers P, Massazza A, McKee M, Roberts B. Mental healthcare access among resettled Syrian refugees in Leipzig, Germany. Glob Ment Health (Camb) 2024; 11:e25. [PMID: 38572249 PMCID: PMC10988152 DOI: 10.1017/gmh.2024.16] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Revised: 01/18/2024] [Accepted: 01/28/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Our aim was to examine mental health needs and access to mental healthcare services among Syrian refugees in the city of Leipzig, Germany. We conducted a cross-sectional survey with Syrian refugee adults in Leipzig, Germany in 2021/2022. Outcomes included PTSD (PCL-5), depression (PHQ-9), anxiety (GAD-7) and somatic symptom (SSS-8). Descriptive, regression and effect modification analyses assessed associations between selected predictor variables and mental health service access. The sampling strategy means findings are applicable only to Syrian refugees in Leipzig. Of the 513 respondents, 18.3% had moderate/severe anxiety symptoms, 28.7% had moderate/severe depression symptoms, and 25.3% had PTSD symptoms. A total of 52.8% reported past year mental health problems, and 48.9% of those participants sought care for these problems. The most common reasons for not accessing mental healthcare services were wanting to handle the problem themselves and uncertainty about where to access services. Adjusted Poisson regression models (n = 259) found significant associations between current mental health symptoms and mental healthcare service access (RR: 1.47, 95% CI: 1.02-2.15, p = 0.041) but significance levels were not reached between somatization and trust in physicians with mental healthcare service access. Syrian refugees in Leipzig likely experience high unmet mental health needs. Community-based interventions for refugee mental health and de-stigmatization activities are needed to address these unmet needs in Leipzig.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha F. Schoenberger
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Kim Schönenberg
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Daniela C. Fuhr
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
- Research Group Implementation Research and Mental Health, Leibniz Institute of Prevention Research and Epidemiology, Bremen, Germany
- Health Sciences, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
| | - Yuriy Nesterko
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
- Research Department, Center ÜBERLEBEN, Berlin, Germany
| | - Heide Glaesmer
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Egbert Sondorp
- Department of Global Health, KIT Royal Tropical Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Aniek Woodward
- Department of Global Health, KIT Royal Tropical Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marit Sijbrandij
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Pim Cuijpers
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Alessandro Massazza
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Martin McKee
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Bayard Roberts
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kurath J, Akhtar A, Karyotaki E, Sijbrandij M, Cuijpers P, Bryant R, Morina N. What works for whom and why? Treatment effects and their moderators among forcibly displaced people receiving psychological and psychosocial interventions: study protocol for an individual patient data meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e078473. [PMID: 38309750 PMCID: PMC10840047 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 02/05/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Forcibly displaced people (FDP) have a high risk of developing mental disorders such as post-traumatic stress (PTS) disorder. Providing adequate mental healthcare for FDP is crucial but despite overall efficacy of many existing interventions, a large proportion of FDP does not benefit from treatment, highlighting the necessity of further investigating factors contributing to individual differences in treatment outcome. Yet, the few studies that have explored moderators of treatment effects are often insufficiently powered. Therefore, the present Individual Patient Data meta-analysis (IPD-MA) will investigate treatment effects and their moderators-variables related to beneficiaries, providers, intervention and study characteristics in relation to PTS outcomes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A systematic literature search will be conducted from database inception in the databases PsycINFO, Cochrane, Embase, PTSDpubs and Web of Science. Only studies published in English, German, French, Spanish, Portuguese, and Dutch will be considered. Retrieved records will be screened for eligibility. Randomised controlled trials on adult FDP receiving psychological and psychosocial interventions aimed at alleviating symptoms such as PTS compared with a control condition without intervention will be included in this IPD-MA. Subsequently, authors of eligible studies will be contacted to request individual patient data (IPD). All datasets obtained will be synthesised into one large dataset which will be analysed using a one-stage approach by conducting mixed-effects linear regression models (ie, primary analysis). Additionally, aggregate data meta-analyes will be run using a two-stage approach by conducting multivariate regression models including all IPD (transformed) and available meta-data from study reports (ie, secondary analysis). PTS will serve as primary outcome measure, while mental health outcomes other than PTS, attendance, attrition, treatment non-response and adverse outcomes will be examined as secondary outcomes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This IPD-MA does not require ethical approval. The results will be published in international peer-reviewed journals. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42022299510.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Kurath
- Department of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Aemal Akhtar
- Division of Insurance Medicine, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
- School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Eirini Karyotaki
- Department of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, WHO Collaborating Center for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Amsterdam Public Health Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marit Sijbrandij
- Department of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, WHO Collaborating Center for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Amsterdam Public Health Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pim Cuijpers
- Department of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, WHO Collaborating Center for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Amsterdam Public Health Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Richard Bryant
- School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Naser Morina
- Department of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
de Graaff AM, Cuijpers P, Boschloo L, Elsawy M, Hunaidy S, Seedat S, Witteveen AB, Huizink AC, Sijbrandij M. The associations of hair cortisol and DHEA with posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms in refugees. Compr Psychiatry 2024; 129:152438. [PMID: 38104462 DOI: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2023.152438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2023] [Revised: 10/09/2023] [Accepted: 11/16/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Exposure to traumatic events, ongoing adversity, and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are associated with altered activity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, but findings are mixed. This may be explained in part by heterogeneity in PTSD symptom profiles. AIM The aim of this study was to investigate the complex relationships between the number of traumatic events and post-displacement stressors, individual symptoms of PTSD, and HPA-axis hormones cortisol and dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) in refugees. METHODS Adult (18+ years) Syrian refugees with increased levels of distress participating in a randomized controlled trial completed baseline measures to assess traumatic events (trauma checklist), post-displacement stressors (Post-Migration Living Difficulties checklist), symptoms of PTSD (PTSD Checklist for DSM-5; PCL-5), and provided a hair sample for additional stress hormone analyses. We used R-packages qgraph and bootnet to perform network analysis on the number of traumatic events and post-displacement stressors, individual symptoms of PTSD, and HPA-axis hormones cortisol and DHEA. The final network model was corrected for depression severity. RESULTS 115 (53% male, M age = 36.9, SD = 12.7) of 206 participants provided a hair sample. A higher number of traumatic events was directly associated with three symptoms of the PTSD cluster arousal and reactivity, i.e., sleep disturbance, hypervigilance and physiological reactivity, and with three other PTSD symptoms, namely flashbacks, avoidance of reminders, and self-destructive behavior. A higher number of post-displacement stressors was associated with four symptoms of the PTSD cluster cognition and mood, i.e., trauma-related amnesia, negative beliefs, blaming of self/others, and detachment, as well as with intrusive thoughts, sleep disturbance, hypervigilance, and exaggerated startle response. The number of traumatic events and post-displacement stressors were not associated with cortisol or DHEA. Cortisol was positively associated with two symptoms of the PTSD cluster cognition and mood, i.e., negative beliefs and negative trauma-related emotions, and negatively associated with avoidance of reminders. DHEA was positively associated with restricted affect and with three symptoms of the PTSD symptom cluster arousal and reactivity, i.e., irritability/anger, sleep disturbance, and self-destructive behavior, and negatively associated with avoidance of thoughts. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrated that exposure to traumatic events and post-displacement stressors is not related to cortisol and DHEA, but that cortisol and DHEA are differentially related to individual symptoms of PTSD. While lower levels of both cortisol and DHEA were associated with increased avoidance, higher levels of cortisol were mostly associated with symptoms of the PTSD cluster cognition and mood and higher levels of DHEA were mostly associated with symptoms of the PTSD cluster arousal and reactivity. These findings contribute to explaining the variability of findings in the literature on HPA-axis activity in PTSD. ETHICS The study was approved by the Research Ethics Review Committee at VU Medical Center, the Netherlands (Protocol ID: NL61361.029.17, 7 September 2017) and prospectively registered online (https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/6665).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne M de Graaff
- Department of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, WHO Collaborating Center for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 7, Amsterdam 1081 BT, the Netherlands.
| | - Pim Cuijpers
- Department of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, WHO Collaborating Center for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 7, Amsterdam 1081 BT, the Netherlands; Babeș-Bolyai University, International Institute for Psychotherapy, Strada Mihail Kogălniceanu 1, Cluj-Napoca 400347, Romania
| | - Lynn Boschloo
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 1, Utrecht 3584 CS, the Netherlands
| | - Mariam Elsawy
- Department of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, WHO Collaborating Center for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 7, Amsterdam 1081 BT, the Netherlands
| | - Sam Hunaidy
- Department of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, WHO Collaborating Center for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 7, Amsterdam 1081 BT, the Netherlands
| | - Soraya Seedat
- SAMRC Genomics of Brain Disorders Unit, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Clinical Building, Francie van Zijl Drive, Tygerberg, Cape Town 7505, South Africa
| | - Anke B Witteveen
- Department of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, WHO Collaborating Center for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 7, Amsterdam 1081 BT, the Netherlands
| | - Anja C Huizink
- Department of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, WHO Collaborating Center for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 7, Amsterdam 1081 BT, the Netherlands
| | - Marit Sijbrandij
- Department of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, WHO Collaborating Center for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 7, Amsterdam 1081 BT, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Linardon J, Torous J, Firth J, Cuijpers P, Messer M, Fuller-Tyszkiewicz M. Current evidence on the efficacy of mental health smartphone apps for symptoms of depression and anxiety. A meta-analysis of 176 randomized controlled trials. World Psychiatry 2024; 23:139-149. [PMID: 38214614 PMCID: PMC10785982 DOI: 10.1002/wps.21183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2024] Open
Abstract
The mental health care available for depression and anxiety has recently undergone a major technological revolution, with growing interest towards the potential of smartphone apps as a scalable tool to treat these conditions. Since the last comprehensive meta-analysis in 2019 established positive yet variable effects of apps on depressive and anxiety symptoms, more than 100 new randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been carried out. We conducted an updated meta-analysis with the objectives of providing more precise estimates of effects, quantifying generalizability from this evidence base, and understanding whether major app and trial characteristics moderate effect sizes. We included 176 RCTs that aimed to treat depressive or anxiety symptoms. Apps had overall significant although small effects on symptoms of depression (N=33,567, g=0.28, p<0.001; number needed to treat, NNT=11.5) and generalized anxiety (N=22,394, g=0.26, p<0.001, NNT=12.4) as compared to control groups. These effects were robust at different follow-ups and after removing small sample and higher risk of bias trials. There was less variability in outcome scores at post-test in app compared to control conditions (ratio of variance, RoV=-0.14, 95% CI: -0.24 to -0.05 for depressive symptoms; RoV=-0.21, 95% CI: -0.31 to -0.12 for generalized anxiety symptoms). Effect sizes for depression were significantly larger when apps incorporated cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) features or included chatbot technology. Effect sizes for anxiety were significantly larger when trials had generalized anxiety as a primary target and administered a CBT app or an app with mood monitoring features. We found evidence of moderate effects of apps on social anxiety (g=0.52) and obsessive-compulsive (g=0.51) symptoms, a small effect on post-traumatic stress symptoms (g=0.12), a large effect on acrophobia symptoms (g=0.90), and a non-significant negative effect on panic symptoms (g=-0.12), although these results should be considered with caution, because most trials had high risk of bias and were based on small sample sizes. We conclude that apps have overall small but significant effects on symptoms of depression and generalized anxiety, and that specific features of apps - such as CBT or mood monitoring features and chatbot technology - are associated with larger effect sizes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jake Linardon
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
- Center for Social and Early Emotional Development, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC, Australia
| | - John Torous
- Department of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Joseph Firth
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
- Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Pim Cuijpers
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- International Institute for Psychotherapy, Babes¸-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Mariel Messer
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
- Center for Social and Early Emotional Development, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Bruijniks SJE, Hollon SD, Lemmens LHJM, Peeters FPML, Arntz A, Cuijpers P, Twisk J, Dingemanse P, Willems L, van Oppen P, van den Boogaard M, Spijker J, Huibers MJH. Long-term outcomes of once weekly v. twice weekly sessions of cognitive behavioral therapy and interpersonal psychotherapy for depression. Psychol Med 2024; 54:517-526. [PMID: 37665012 DOI: 10.1017/s0033291723002143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Twice weekly sessions of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT) for major depressive disorder (MDD) lead to less drop-out and quicker and better response compared to once weekly sessions at posttreatment, but it is unclear whether these effects hold over the long run. AIMS Compare the effects of twice weekly v. weekly sessions of CBT and IPT for depression up to 24 months since the start of treatment. METHODS Using a 2 × 2 factorial design, this multicentre study randomized 200 adults with MDD to once or twice weekly sessions of CBT or IPT over 16-24 weeks, up to a maximum of 20 sessions. Main outcome measures were depression severity, measured with the Beck Depression Inventory-II and the Longitudinal Interval Follow-up Evaluation. Intention-to-treat analyses were conducted. RESULTS Compared with patients who received once weekly sessions, patients who received twice weekly sessions showed a significant decrease in depressive symptoms up through month 9, but this effect was no longer apparent at month 24. Patients who received CBT showed a significantly larger decrease in depressive symptoms up to month 24 compared to patients who received IPT, but the between-group effect size at month 24 was small. No differential effects between session frequencies or treatment modalities were found in response or relapse rates. CONCLUSIONS Although a higher session frequency leads to better outcomes in the acute phase of treatment, the difference in depression severity dissipated over time and there was no significant difference in relapse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanne J E Bruijniks
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Steven D Hollon
- Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Lotte H J M Lemmens
- Department of Clinical Psychological Science, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Frenk P M L Peeters
- Department of Clinical Psychological Science, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Arnoud Arntz
- Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pim Cuijpers
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jos Twisk
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pieter Dingemanse
- Department of Mood Disorders, Altrecht Mental Health Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Linda Willems
- Department of Mood Disorders, GGZ Oost Brabant, Oss, The Netherlands
| | - Patricia van Oppen
- Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit/GGZ inGeest and Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Jan Spijker
- Center of Depression Expertise, Pro Persona Mental Health Care; and Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Marcus J H Huibers
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- NPI Center for Personality Disorders/ARKIN, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Li XM, Huang FF, Cuijpers P, Liu H, Karyotaki E, Li ZJ, Miguel C, Ciharova M, Dobson K. The efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapies for depression in China in comparison with the rest of the world: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Consult Clin Psychol 2024; 92:105-117. [PMID: 37902688 DOI: 10.1037/ccp0000854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE There is consistent evidence that cognitive behavioral therapies (CBTs) are effective interventions for adult depression. While some evidence has compared these effects in different countries, no prior systematic review and meta-analysis has compared the efficacy of CBTs between Chinese and people from the rest of the world. The current meta-analysis addressed this gap by a systematic review of eligible studies from Chinese and worldwide databases. METHOD Hedges' g was calculated using a random-effects model. Subgroup analyses and multilevel meta-analytic models were conducted to examine the relationship among effect sizes and the characteristics in Chinese studies. Metaregression analyses were conducted to explore the difference of the efficacy of CBTs between Chinese studies and non-Chinese studies after controlling for the moderators. RESULTS A total of 34 (n = 3,710) studies in China and 307 (n = 30,333) studies from the rest of the world were included. The effect size of CBTs on depression for Chinese participants was 1.19 (95% CI [0.86, 1.52]), which was higher (Q = 4.63, p = .03) than the effect size of the rest of the world (0.82, 95% CI [0.74, 0.90]). After controlling for moderators, the effect size of Chinese studies was still higher than non-Chinese studies (β = 0.351, p = .011). CONCLUSIONS CBTs are effective interventions for adult depression and deserve more attention in China for depression management. Moderators related to study design, clinical features, and cultural factors need to be considered in the interpretation of the results. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiao-Miao Li
- Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Calgary
| | - Fang-Fang Huang
- Department of Clinical Psychology, National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders, Beijing Anding Hospital, Capital Medical University
| | - Pim Cuijpers
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
| | - Huan Liu
- Department of Clinical Psychology, National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders, Beijing Anding Hospital, Capital Medical University
| | - Eirini Karyotaki
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
| | - Zhan-Jiang Li
- Department of Clinical Psychology, National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders, Beijing Anding Hospital, Capital Medical University
| | - Clara Miguel
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
| | - Marketa Ciharova
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
| | - Keith Dobson
- Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Calgary
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Slade M, Rennick-Egglestone S, Elliott RA, Newby C, Robinson C, Gavan SP, Paterson L, Ali Y, Yeo C, Glover T, Pollock K, Callard F, Priebe S, Thornicroft G, Repper J, Keppens J, Smuk M, Franklin D, Walcott R, Harrison J, Smith R, Robotham D, Bradstreet S, Gillard S, Cuijpers P, Farkas M, Zeev DB, Davidson L, Kotera Y, Roe J, Ng F, Llewellyn-Beardsley J. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of online recorded recovery narratives in improving quality of life for people with non-psychotic mental health problems: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. World Psychiatry 2024; 23:101-112. [PMID: 38214639 PMCID: PMC10785987 DOI: 10.1002/wps.21176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Narratives describing first-hand experiences of recovery from mental health problems are widely available. Emerging evidence suggests that engaging with mental health recovery narratives can benefit people experiencing mental health problems, but no randomized controlled trial has been conducted as yet. We developed the Narrative Experiences Online (NEON) Intervention, a web application providing self-guided and recommender systems access to a collection of recorded mental health recovery narratives (n=659). We investigated whether NEON Intervention access benefited adults experiencing non-psychotic mental health problems by conducting a pragmatic parallel-group randomized trial, with usual care as control condition. The primary endpoint was quality of life at week 52 assessed by the Manchester Short Assessment (MANSA). Secondary outcomes were psychological distress, hope, self-efficacy, and meaning in life at week 52. Between March 9, 2020 and March 26, 2021, we recruited 1,023 participants from across England (the target based on power analysis was 994), of whom 827 (80.8%) identified as White British, 811 (79.3%) were female, 586 (57.3%) were employed, and 272 (26.6%) were unemployed. Their mean age was 38.4±13.6 years. Mood and/or anxiety disorders (N=626, 61.2%) and stress-related disorders (N=152, 14.9%) were the most common mental health problems. At week 52, our intention-to-treat analysis found a significant baseline-adjusted difference of 0.13 (95% CI: 0.01-0.26, p=0.041) in the MANSA score between the intervention and control groups, corresponding to a mean change of 1.56 scale points per participant, which indicates that the intervention increased quality of life. We also detected a significant baseline-adjusted difference of 0.22 (95% CI: 0.05-0.40, p=0.014) between the groups in the score on the "presence of meaning" subscale of the Meaning in Life Questionnaire, corresponding to a mean change of 1.1 scale points per participant. We found an incremental gain of 0.0142 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) (95% credible interval: 0.0059 to 0.0226) and a £178 incremental increase in cost (95% credible interval: -£154 to £455) per participant, generating an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £12,526 per QALY compared with usual care. This was lower than the £20,000 per QALY threshold used by the National Health Service in England, indicating that the intervention would be a cost-effective use of health service resources. In the subgroup analysis including participants who had used specialist mental health services at baseline, the intervention both reduced cost (-£98, 95% credible interval: -£606 to £309) and improved QALYs (0.0165, 95% credible interval: 0.0057 to 0.0273) per participant as compared to usual care. We conclude that the NEON Intervention is an effective and cost-effective new intervention for people experiencing non-psychotic mental health problems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mike Slade
- School of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- Faculty of Nursing and Health Sciences, Health and Community Participation Division, Nord University, Namsos, Norway
| | | | - Rachel A Elliott
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Chris Newby
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Clare Robinson
- Centre for Evaluation and Methods, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Pragmatic Clinical Trials Unit, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Sean P Gavan
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Luke Paterson
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Yasmin Ali
- School of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Caroline Yeo
- School of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- Department of Architecture and Built Environment, Faculty of Engineering, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | | | - Kristian Pollock
- School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Felicity Callard
- School of Geographical & Earth Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Stefan Priebe
- Unit for Social and Community Psychiatry, East London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Graham Thornicroft
- Centre for Implementation Science and Centre for Global Mental Health, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | | | - Jeroen Keppens
- Department of Informatics, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Melanie Smuk
- Centre for Genomics and Child Health, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | | | - Rianna Walcott
- Black Communication and Technology Lab, Department of Communication, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
| | | | - Roger Smith
- NEON Lived Experience Advisory Panel, Nottingham, UK
| | | | - Simon Bradstreet
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Steve Gillard
- School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK
| | - Pim Cuijpers
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- International Institute for Psychotherapy, Babes¸-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Marianne Farkas
- Center for Psychiatric Rehabilitation, College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Dror Ben Zeev
- School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Larry Davidson
- Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Yasuhiro Kotera
- School of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- Center for Infectious Disease Education and Research, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - James Roe
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration East Midlands, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Fiona Ng
- School of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Joy Llewellyn-Beardsley
- School of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Pei J, Amanvermez Y, Vigo D, Puyat J, Kessler RC, Mortier P, Bruffaerts R, Rankin O, Chua SN, Martínez V, Rapsey C, Fodor LA, David OA, Garcia C, Cuijpers P. Sociodemographic Correlates of Mental Health Treatment Seeking Among College Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Psychiatr Serv 2024:appips20230414. [PMID: 38291886 DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.20230414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE College students have high rates of mental health problems and low rates of treatment. Although sociodemographic disparities in student mental health treatment seeking have been reported, findings have not been synthesized and quantified. The extent to which differences in perceived need for treatment contribute to overall disparities remains unclear. METHODS A systematic search of PubMed, PsycInfo, and Embase was conducted. Studies published between 2007 and 2022 were included if they reported treatment rates among college students with mental health problems, stratified by sex, gender, race-ethnicity, sexual orientation, student type, student year, or student status. Random-effects models were used to calculate pooled prevalence ratios (PRs) of having a perceived need for treatment and of receiving treatment for each sociodemographic subgroup. RESULTS Twenty-one studies qualified for inclusion. Among students experiencing mental health problems, consistent and significant sociodemographic differences were identified in perceived need for treatment and treatment receipt. Students from racial-ethnic minority groups (in particular, Asian students [PR=0.49]) and international students (PR=0.63) reported lower rates of treatment receipt than White students and domestic students, respectively. Students identifying as female (sex) or as women (gender) (combined PR=1.33) reported higher rates of treatment receipt than students identifying as male or as men. Differences in perceived need appeared to contribute to some disparities; in particular, students identifying as male or as men reported considerably lower rates of perceived need than students identifying as female or as women. CONCLUSIONS Findings highlight the need for policy makers to address barriers throughout the treatment-seeking pathway and to tailor efforts to student subgroups to reduce treatment disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Pei
- Department of Psychiatry (Pei, Vigo) and School of Population and Public Health (Pei, Vigo, Puyat), University of British Columbia, Vancouver; Department of Clinical, Neuro-, and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam (Amanvermez, Cuijpers); Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston (Kessler); Health Services Research Unit, Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain, and Consorcio Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Epidemiología y Salud Pública, Madrid (Mortier); Center for Public Health Psychiatry, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (Bruffaerts); Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts (Rankin); Relate Mental Health Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, and School of Biological Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (Chua); Centro de Medicina Reproductiva y Desarrollo Integral del Adolescente, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, and Millennium Nucleus to Improve the Mental Health of Adolescents and Youths, Santiago, Chile (Martínez); Department of Psychological Medicine (Rapsey) and Department of Psychology (Garcia), University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand; International Institute for the Advanced Studies of Psychotherapy and Applied Mental Health, Babeş-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania (Fodor, David, Cuijpers)
| | - Yagmur Amanvermez
- Department of Psychiatry (Pei, Vigo) and School of Population and Public Health (Pei, Vigo, Puyat), University of British Columbia, Vancouver; Department of Clinical, Neuro-, and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam (Amanvermez, Cuijpers); Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston (Kessler); Health Services Research Unit, Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain, and Consorcio Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Epidemiología y Salud Pública, Madrid (Mortier); Center for Public Health Psychiatry, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (Bruffaerts); Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts (Rankin); Relate Mental Health Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, and School of Biological Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (Chua); Centro de Medicina Reproductiva y Desarrollo Integral del Adolescente, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, and Millennium Nucleus to Improve the Mental Health of Adolescents and Youths, Santiago, Chile (Martínez); Department of Psychological Medicine (Rapsey) and Department of Psychology (Garcia), University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand; International Institute for the Advanced Studies of Psychotherapy and Applied Mental Health, Babeş-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania (Fodor, David, Cuijpers)
| | - Daniel Vigo
- Department of Psychiatry (Pei, Vigo) and School of Population and Public Health (Pei, Vigo, Puyat), University of British Columbia, Vancouver; Department of Clinical, Neuro-, and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam (Amanvermez, Cuijpers); Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston (Kessler); Health Services Research Unit, Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain, and Consorcio Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Epidemiología y Salud Pública, Madrid (Mortier); Center for Public Health Psychiatry, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (Bruffaerts); Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts (Rankin); Relate Mental Health Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, and School of Biological Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (Chua); Centro de Medicina Reproductiva y Desarrollo Integral del Adolescente, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, and Millennium Nucleus to Improve the Mental Health of Adolescents and Youths, Santiago, Chile (Martínez); Department of Psychological Medicine (Rapsey) and Department of Psychology (Garcia), University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand; International Institute for the Advanced Studies of Psychotherapy and Applied Mental Health, Babeş-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania (Fodor, David, Cuijpers)
| | - Joseph Puyat
- Department of Psychiatry (Pei, Vigo) and School of Population and Public Health (Pei, Vigo, Puyat), University of British Columbia, Vancouver; Department of Clinical, Neuro-, and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam (Amanvermez, Cuijpers); Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston (Kessler); Health Services Research Unit, Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain, and Consorcio Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Epidemiología y Salud Pública, Madrid (Mortier); Center for Public Health Psychiatry, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (Bruffaerts); Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts (Rankin); Relate Mental Health Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, and School of Biological Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (Chua); Centro de Medicina Reproductiva y Desarrollo Integral del Adolescente, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, and Millennium Nucleus to Improve the Mental Health of Adolescents and Youths, Santiago, Chile (Martínez); Department of Psychological Medicine (Rapsey) and Department of Psychology (Garcia), University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand; International Institute for the Advanced Studies of Psychotherapy and Applied Mental Health, Babeş-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania (Fodor, David, Cuijpers)
| | - Ronald C Kessler
- Department of Psychiatry (Pei, Vigo) and School of Population and Public Health (Pei, Vigo, Puyat), University of British Columbia, Vancouver; Department of Clinical, Neuro-, and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam (Amanvermez, Cuijpers); Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston (Kessler); Health Services Research Unit, Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain, and Consorcio Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Epidemiología y Salud Pública, Madrid (Mortier); Center for Public Health Psychiatry, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (Bruffaerts); Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts (Rankin); Relate Mental Health Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, and School of Biological Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (Chua); Centro de Medicina Reproductiva y Desarrollo Integral del Adolescente, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, and Millennium Nucleus to Improve the Mental Health of Adolescents and Youths, Santiago, Chile (Martínez); Department of Psychological Medicine (Rapsey) and Department of Psychology (Garcia), University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand; International Institute for the Advanced Studies of Psychotherapy and Applied Mental Health, Babeş-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania (Fodor, David, Cuijpers)
| | - Philippe Mortier
- Department of Psychiatry (Pei, Vigo) and School of Population and Public Health (Pei, Vigo, Puyat), University of British Columbia, Vancouver; Department of Clinical, Neuro-, and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam (Amanvermez, Cuijpers); Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston (Kessler); Health Services Research Unit, Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain, and Consorcio Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Epidemiología y Salud Pública, Madrid (Mortier); Center for Public Health Psychiatry, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (Bruffaerts); Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts (Rankin); Relate Mental Health Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, and School of Biological Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (Chua); Centro de Medicina Reproductiva y Desarrollo Integral del Adolescente, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, and Millennium Nucleus to Improve the Mental Health of Adolescents and Youths, Santiago, Chile (Martínez); Department of Psychological Medicine (Rapsey) and Department of Psychology (Garcia), University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand; International Institute for the Advanced Studies of Psychotherapy and Applied Mental Health, Babeş-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania (Fodor, David, Cuijpers)
| | - Ronny Bruffaerts
- Department of Psychiatry (Pei, Vigo) and School of Population and Public Health (Pei, Vigo, Puyat), University of British Columbia, Vancouver; Department of Clinical, Neuro-, and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam (Amanvermez, Cuijpers); Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston (Kessler); Health Services Research Unit, Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain, and Consorcio Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Epidemiología y Salud Pública, Madrid (Mortier); Center for Public Health Psychiatry, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (Bruffaerts); Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts (Rankin); Relate Mental Health Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, and School of Biological Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (Chua); Centro de Medicina Reproductiva y Desarrollo Integral del Adolescente, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, and Millennium Nucleus to Improve the Mental Health of Adolescents and Youths, Santiago, Chile (Martínez); Department of Psychological Medicine (Rapsey) and Department of Psychology (Garcia), University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand; International Institute for the Advanced Studies of Psychotherapy and Applied Mental Health, Babeş-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania (Fodor, David, Cuijpers)
| | - Osiris Rankin
- Department of Psychiatry (Pei, Vigo) and School of Population and Public Health (Pei, Vigo, Puyat), University of British Columbia, Vancouver; Department of Clinical, Neuro-, and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam (Amanvermez, Cuijpers); Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston (Kessler); Health Services Research Unit, Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain, and Consorcio Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Epidemiología y Salud Pública, Madrid (Mortier); Center for Public Health Psychiatry, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (Bruffaerts); Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts (Rankin); Relate Mental Health Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, and School of Biological Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (Chua); Centro de Medicina Reproductiva y Desarrollo Integral del Adolescente, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, and Millennium Nucleus to Improve the Mental Health of Adolescents and Youths, Santiago, Chile (Martínez); Department of Psychological Medicine (Rapsey) and Department of Psychology (Garcia), University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand; International Institute for the Advanced Studies of Psychotherapy and Applied Mental Health, Babeş-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania (Fodor, David, Cuijpers)
| | - Sook Ning Chua
- Department of Psychiatry (Pei, Vigo) and School of Population and Public Health (Pei, Vigo, Puyat), University of British Columbia, Vancouver; Department of Clinical, Neuro-, and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam (Amanvermez, Cuijpers); Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston (Kessler); Health Services Research Unit, Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain, and Consorcio Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Epidemiología y Salud Pública, Madrid (Mortier); Center for Public Health Psychiatry, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (Bruffaerts); Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts (Rankin); Relate Mental Health Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, and School of Biological Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (Chua); Centro de Medicina Reproductiva y Desarrollo Integral del Adolescente, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, and Millennium Nucleus to Improve the Mental Health of Adolescents and Youths, Santiago, Chile (Martínez); Department of Psychological Medicine (Rapsey) and Department of Psychology (Garcia), University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand; International Institute for the Advanced Studies of Psychotherapy and Applied Mental Health, Babeş-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania (Fodor, David, Cuijpers)
| | - Vania Martínez
- Department of Psychiatry (Pei, Vigo) and School of Population and Public Health (Pei, Vigo, Puyat), University of British Columbia, Vancouver; Department of Clinical, Neuro-, and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam (Amanvermez, Cuijpers); Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston (Kessler); Health Services Research Unit, Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain, and Consorcio Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Epidemiología y Salud Pública, Madrid (Mortier); Center for Public Health Psychiatry, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (Bruffaerts); Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts (Rankin); Relate Mental Health Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, and School of Biological Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (Chua); Centro de Medicina Reproductiva y Desarrollo Integral del Adolescente, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, and Millennium Nucleus to Improve the Mental Health of Adolescents and Youths, Santiago, Chile (Martínez); Department of Psychological Medicine (Rapsey) and Department of Psychology (Garcia), University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand; International Institute for the Advanced Studies of Psychotherapy and Applied Mental Health, Babeş-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania (Fodor, David, Cuijpers)
| | - Charlene Rapsey
- Department of Psychiatry (Pei, Vigo) and School of Population and Public Health (Pei, Vigo, Puyat), University of British Columbia, Vancouver; Department of Clinical, Neuro-, and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam (Amanvermez, Cuijpers); Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston (Kessler); Health Services Research Unit, Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain, and Consorcio Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Epidemiología y Salud Pública, Madrid (Mortier); Center for Public Health Psychiatry, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (Bruffaerts); Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts (Rankin); Relate Mental Health Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, and School of Biological Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (Chua); Centro de Medicina Reproductiva y Desarrollo Integral del Adolescente, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, and Millennium Nucleus to Improve the Mental Health of Adolescents and Youths, Santiago, Chile (Martínez); Department of Psychological Medicine (Rapsey) and Department of Psychology (Garcia), University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand; International Institute for the Advanced Studies of Psychotherapy and Applied Mental Health, Babeş-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania (Fodor, David, Cuijpers)
| | - Liviu A Fodor
- Department of Psychiatry (Pei, Vigo) and School of Population and Public Health (Pei, Vigo, Puyat), University of British Columbia, Vancouver; Department of Clinical, Neuro-, and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam (Amanvermez, Cuijpers); Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston (Kessler); Health Services Research Unit, Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain, and Consorcio Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Epidemiología y Salud Pública, Madrid (Mortier); Center for Public Health Psychiatry, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (Bruffaerts); Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts (Rankin); Relate Mental Health Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, and School of Biological Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (Chua); Centro de Medicina Reproductiva y Desarrollo Integral del Adolescente, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, and Millennium Nucleus to Improve the Mental Health of Adolescents and Youths, Santiago, Chile (Martínez); Department of Psychological Medicine (Rapsey) and Department of Psychology (Garcia), University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand; International Institute for the Advanced Studies of Psychotherapy and Applied Mental Health, Babeş-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania (Fodor, David, Cuijpers)
| | - Oana A David
- Department of Psychiatry (Pei, Vigo) and School of Population and Public Health (Pei, Vigo, Puyat), University of British Columbia, Vancouver; Department of Clinical, Neuro-, and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam (Amanvermez, Cuijpers); Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston (Kessler); Health Services Research Unit, Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain, and Consorcio Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Epidemiología y Salud Pública, Madrid (Mortier); Center for Public Health Psychiatry, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (Bruffaerts); Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts (Rankin); Relate Mental Health Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, and School of Biological Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (Chua); Centro de Medicina Reproductiva y Desarrollo Integral del Adolescente, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, and Millennium Nucleus to Improve the Mental Health of Adolescents and Youths, Santiago, Chile (Martínez); Department of Psychological Medicine (Rapsey) and Department of Psychology (Garcia), University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand; International Institute for the Advanced Studies of Psychotherapy and Applied Mental Health, Babeş-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania (Fodor, David, Cuijpers)
| | - Claudia Garcia
- Department of Psychiatry (Pei, Vigo) and School of Population and Public Health (Pei, Vigo, Puyat), University of British Columbia, Vancouver; Department of Clinical, Neuro-, and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam (Amanvermez, Cuijpers); Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston (Kessler); Health Services Research Unit, Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain, and Consorcio Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Epidemiología y Salud Pública, Madrid (Mortier); Center for Public Health Psychiatry, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (Bruffaerts); Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts (Rankin); Relate Mental Health Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, and School of Biological Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (Chua); Centro de Medicina Reproductiva y Desarrollo Integral del Adolescente, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, and Millennium Nucleus to Improve the Mental Health of Adolescents and Youths, Santiago, Chile (Martínez); Department of Psychological Medicine (Rapsey) and Department of Psychology (Garcia), University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand; International Institute for the Advanced Studies of Psychotherapy and Applied Mental Health, Babeş-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania (Fodor, David, Cuijpers)
| | - Pim Cuijpers
- Department of Psychiatry (Pei, Vigo) and School of Population and Public Health (Pei, Vigo, Puyat), University of British Columbia, Vancouver; Department of Clinical, Neuro-, and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam (Amanvermez, Cuijpers); Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston (Kessler); Health Services Research Unit, Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain, and Consorcio Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Epidemiología y Salud Pública, Madrid (Mortier); Center for Public Health Psychiatry, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (Bruffaerts); Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts (Rankin); Relate Mental Health Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, and School of Biological Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (Chua); Centro de Medicina Reproductiva y Desarrollo Integral del Adolescente, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, and Millennium Nucleus to Improve the Mental Health of Adolescents and Youths, Santiago, Chile (Martínez); Department of Psychological Medicine (Rapsey) and Department of Psychology (Garcia), University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand; International Institute for the Advanced Studies of Psychotherapy and Applied Mental Health, Babeş-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania (Fodor, David, Cuijpers)
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Abi Ramia J, Abi Hana R, Noun P, Cuijpers P, Carswell K, van't Hof E, Heim E, Zoghbi E, Sijbrandij M, El Chammay R. Feasibility and uptake of a digital mental health intervention for depression among Lebanese and Syrian displaced people in Lebanon: a qualitative study. Front Public Health 2024; 11:1293187. [PMID: 38317685 PMCID: PMC10840138 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1293187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/22/2023] [Indexed: 02/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Digital interventions are increasingly regarded as a potential solution for the inaccessibility of mental health treatment across low-and-middle-income settings, especially for common mental disorders. Step-by-Step (SbS) is a digital, guided self-help intervention for depression found effective in two Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) in Lebanon. For research implementation and further scale-up, this paper reports the results of a qualitative evaluation of SbS among the Lebanese and others and displaced Syrians in Lebanon. Methods Thirty-four Key Informant Interviews (KIIs) were executed with participants of the RCTs, SbS staff members, and external stakeholders. Questions garnered feedback about the feasibility, acceptability, enabling factors, and barriers to adhering to the research, implementation, and the SbS intervention. A thematic analysis was conducted using NVivo, and key themes, topics, and recommendations, on research methods and the intervention itself, were generated and reported. Results Results showed a high level of acceptability of SbS among Lebanese and Syrians and identified sub-groups for whom acceptance or use might be lower, such as older adults and people with limited access to the internet or smartphones. Furthermore, interviews identified the main enabling factors and barriers to adherence related to the research design, content, and delivery approach. Barriers related to feasibility included lengthy assessments as part of the RCTs, and mistrust related to delays in study compensations. Other common challenges were forgetting login credentials, poor internet connection, being busy and competing needs. Enabling factors and best practices included motivating participants to use the intervention through the weekly support provided by helpers, setting an oral contract for commitment, and dividing the compensations into several installments as part of the RCTs. Recommendations regarding sustainability were given. Discussion The findings show that overall, SbS is feasible, acceptable, and much needed in Lebanon among the Lebanese and Syrians. This assessment identifies reasons for low adherence to the research and the intervention and presents improvement solutions. Recommendations generated in this paper inform the upscale of SbS and the planning, design, and implementation of future digital interventions in research and service provision settings in the mental health field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinane Abi Ramia
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, World Health Organization (WHO) Collaborating Center for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- National Mental Health Programme, Ministry of Public Health of Lebanon, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Racha Abi Hana
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, World Health Organization (WHO) Collaborating Center for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- National Mental Health Programme, Ministry of Public Health of Lebanon, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Philip Noun
- National Mental Health Programme, Ministry of Public Health of Lebanon, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Pim Cuijpers
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, World Health Organization (WHO) Collaborating Center for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- International Institute for Psychotherapy, Babeş-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Kenneth Carswell
- Department of Mental Health and Substance Use, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Edith van't Hof
- Department of Mental Health and Substance Use, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Eva Heim
- Institute of Psychology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Edwina Zoghbi
- Country Office for Lebanon, World Health Organization, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Marit Sijbrandij
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, World Health Organization (WHO) Collaborating Center for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Rabih El Chammay
- National Mental Health Programme, Ministry of Public Health of Lebanon, Beirut, Lebanon
- Psychiatry Department, Faculty of Medicine, Saint Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Baumgartner JS, Renner A, Wochele-Thoma T, Wehle P, Barbui C, Purgato M, Tedeschi F, Tarsitani L, Roselli V, Acartürk C, Uygun E, Anttila M, Lantta T, Välimäki M, Churchill R, Walker L, Sijbrandij M, Cuijpers P, Koesters M, Klein T, White RG, Aichberger MC, Wancata J. Impairments in psychological functioning in refugees and asylum seekers. Front Psychol 2024; 14:1295031. [PMID: 38259575 PMCID: PMC10801113 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1295031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Accepted: 12/14/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Refugees are at increased risk for developing psychological impairments due to stressors in the pre-, peri- and post-migration periods. There is limited knowledge on how everyday functioning is affected by migration experience. In a secondary analysis of a study in a sample of refugees and asylum seekers, it was examined how aspects of psychological functioning were differentially affected. 1,101 eligible refugees and asylum seekers in Europe and Türkiye were included in a cross-sectional analysis. Gender, age, education, number of relatives and children living nearby, as well as indicators for depressive and posttraumatic symptoms, quality of life, psychological well-being and functioning, and lifetime potentially traumatic events were assessed. Correlations and multiple regression models with World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) 12-item version's total and six subdomains' scores ('mobility', 'life activities', 'cognition', 'participation', 'self-care', 'getting along') as dependent variables were calculated. Tests for multicollinearity and Bonferroni correction were applied. Participants reported highest levels of impairment in 'mobility' and 'participation', followed by 'life activities' and 'cognition'. Depression and posttraumatic symptoms were independently associated with overall psychological functioning and all subdomains. History of violence and abuse seemed to predict higher impairment in 'participation', while past events of being close to death were associated with fewer issues with 'self-care'. Impairment in psychological functioning in asylum seekers and refugees was related to current psychological symptoms. Mobility and participation issues may explain difficulties arising after resettlement in integration and exchange with host communities in new contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josef S. Baumgartner
- Clinical Division of Social Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Antonia Renner
- Clinical Division of Social Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Peter Wehle
- Clinical Division of Social Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Psychosocial Services in Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Corrado Barbui
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Mental Health and Service Evaluation, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Section of Psychiatry, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Marianna Purgato
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Mental Health and Service Evaluation, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Section of Psychiatry, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Federico Tedeschi
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Mental Health and Service Evaluation, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Section of Psychiatry, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Tarsitani
- Department of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Valentina Roselli
- Department of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Ceren Acartürk
- Department of Psychology, College of Social Sciences and Humanities, Koc University, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | - Ersin Uygun
- Emergency and Disaster Management, Vocational School of Health Services, Bilgi University, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | - Minna Anttila
- Department of Nursing Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Tella Lantta
- Department of Nursing Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Maritta Välimäki
- Department of Nursing Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Rachel Churchill
- Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom
| | - Lauren Walker
- Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom
- School of Health and Social Work, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom
| | - Marit Sijbrandij
- Department of Clinical, Neuro, and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Pim Cuijpers
- Department of Clinical, Neuro, and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Markus Koesters
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy ll, District Hospital Guenzburg, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
- Center for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität, Dresden, Germany
| | - Thomas Klein
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy ll, District Hospital Guenzburg, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
- Center for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität, Dresden, Germany
| | - Ross G. White
- Institute of Population Health, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Marion C. Aichberger
- Clinical Division of Social Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Johannes Wancata
- Clinical Division of Social Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Wright SL, Karyotaki E, Cuijpers P, Bisson J, Papola D, Witteveen A, Suliman S, Spies G, Ahmadi K, Capezzani L, Carletto S, Karatzias T, Kullack C, Laugharne J, Lee CW, Nijdam MJ, Olff M, Ostacoli L, Seedat S, Sijbrandij M. EMDR v. other psychological therapies for PTSD: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis. Psychol Med 2024:1-9. [PMID: 38173121 DOI: 10.1017/s0033291723003446] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis (IPDMA) examined the overall effectiveness of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) in reducing posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms, achieving response and remission, and reducing treatment dropout among adults with PTSD compared to other psychological treatments. Additionally, we examined available participant-level moderators of the efficacy of EMDR. METHODS This study included randomized controlled trials. Eligible studies were identified by a systematic search in PubMed, Embase, PsyclNFO, PTSDpubs, and CENTRAL. The target population was adults with above-threshold baseline PTSD symptoms. Trials were eligible if at least 70% of study participants had been diagnosed with PTSD using a structured clinical interview. Primary outcomes included PTSD symptom severity, treatment response, and PTSD remission. Treatment dropout was a secondary outcome. The systematic search retrieved 15 eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs); 8 of these 15 were able to be included in this IPDMA (346 patients). Comparator treatments included relaxation therapy, emotional freedom technique, trauma-focused cognitive behavioral psychotherapies, and REM-desensitization. RESULTS One-stage IPDMA found no significant difference between EMDR and other psychological treatments in reducing PTSD symptom severity (β = -0.24), achieving response (β = 0.86), attaining remission (β = 1.05), or reducing treatment dropout rates (β = -0.25). Moderator analyses found unemployed participants receiving EMDR had higher PTSD symptom severity at the post-test, and males were more likely to drop out of EMDR treatment than females. CONCLUSION The current study found no significant difference between EMDR and other psychological treatments. We found some indication of the moderating effects of gender and employment status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simonne Lesley Wright
- South Africa PTSD Research Programme of Excellence, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
- Department of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, World Health Organization Collaborating Center for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eirini Karyotaki
- Department of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, World Health Organization Collaborating Center for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pim Cuijpers
- Department of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, World Health Organization Collaborating Center for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jonathan Bisson
- Division of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Davide Papola
- Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine, and Movement Sciences, Section of Psychiatry, WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Mental Health and Service Evaluation, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Anke Witteveen
- Department of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, World Health Organization Collaborating Center for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sharain Suliman
- South Africa PTSD Research Programme of Excellence, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Georgina Spies
- South Africa PTSD Research Programme of Excellence, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Khodabakhsh Ahmadi
- Behavioral Sciences Research Center, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Liuva Capezzani
- The International Institute for Psychoanalytic Research and Training of Health Professionals (IIPRTHP), Rome, Italy
- International School for Psychotherapy (SIPSI), Rome, Italy
| | - Sara Carletto
- Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Thanos Karatzias
- School of Health & Social Care, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, Scotland
| | | | - Jonathan Laugharne
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - Christopher William Lee
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia
| | - Mirjam J Nijdam
- Department of Psychiatry & Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam University Medical Center location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- ARQ National Psychotrauma Center, Diemen, The Netherlands
| | - Miranda Olff
- Department of Psychiatry & Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam University Medical Center location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- ARQ National Psychotrauma Center, Diemen, The Netherlands
| | - Luca Ostacoli
- Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Soraya Seedat
- South Africa PTSD Research Programme of Excellence, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
- South African Medical Research Council Unit on the Genomics of Brain Disorders, Department of Psychiatry, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Marit Sijbrandij
- Department of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, World Health Organization Collaborating Center for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Tröger A, Miguel C, Ciharova M, de Ponti N, Durman G, Cuijpers P, Karyotaki E. Baseline depression severity as moderator on depression outcomes in psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy. J Affect Disord 2024; 344:86-99. [PMID: 37820960 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.10.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2023] [Revised: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 10/08/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence-based treatments for adult depression include psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy, yet little is known about how baseline depression severity moderates treatment outcome. OBJECTIVES We aimed to compare the effects of psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy for adult depression and to examine the association between baseline depression severity and treatment outcome, converting multiple baseline depression measures into the scores of the Beck Depression Inventory, second edition (BDI-II). METHODS We conducted systematic searches in bibliographical databases up to September 2022 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in which psychotherapy was compared with pharmacotherapy in the treatment of adult depression. Various meta-regressions using the baseline depression severity as predictor of the relative effects of psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy were performed. RESULTS We identified 65 RCTs including 7250 participants for the meta-analyses and 56 RCTs including 5548 participants for the meta-regression. We found no significant difference between psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy (g = -0.08, 95 % CI: -0.2 to 0.04, p = 0.193) and baseline depression severity was not significantly associated with the relative effects of psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy (B = 0.0032, SE = 0.0096, p = 0.74). Results were similar in several sensitivity analyses. LIMITATIONS Limitations included the low quality of the included studies, and the omission of long-term effects and within-study variability. CONCLUSIONS We found no indication for a moderation effect of baseline depression severity on the relative effects of psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy. Thus, other factors such as availability and patients' preference must be considered when deciding for treatment options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Tröger
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universitat Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
| | - Clara Miguel
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marketa Ciharova
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Nino de Ponti
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Güldehan Durman
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Pim Cuijpers
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Eirini Karyotaki
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
van der Spek N, Dekker W, Peen J, Santens T, Cuijpers P, Bosmans G, Dekker J. Attachment-Based Family Therapy for Adolescents and Young Adults With Suicide Ideation and Depression. Crisis 2024; 45:48-56. [PMID: 37644809 DOI: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000916] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/31/2023]
Abstract
Background: Suicide ideation among adolescents is difficult to treat. Attachment-based family therapy (ABFT) is a promising evidence-based family intervention developed to decrease depressive symptoms and suicide ideation among adolescents. Aims: This open trial assessed the feasibility of ABFT for adolescents (12-23 years) with suicide ideation and depression in an outpatient community mental health center in the Netherlands, by monitoring treatment compliance and satisfaction, treatment dose, and symptom reduction. Methods: Eligible patients were referred by the multidisciplinary treatment team at the facility. Treatment dose was monitored by the therapist. Depression (CDI-2), family functioning (SRFF), and strengths and difficulties (SDQ) were assessed online before the intervention and at 3, 6, and 9 months after baseline. Suicide ideation (SIQ-JR) was assessed at each therapy session, and a satisfaction questionnaire was administered postintervention. A total of 25 families signed informed consent, received ABFT treatment, and were included in the analyses. The therapists were at beginners' level of ABFT, working under supervision during the trial. Results: The treatment dose was acceptable, though impacted by COVID-related lockdowns, and treatment compliance was 89%. Patients received on average 22 ABFT sessions, and about half of the patients received additional psychotherapy. On average, patients were satisfied with ABFT. There was a significant decrease in suicide ideation postintervention (d = 0.69) and significant effects on the CDI-2, SRFF, and SDQ at follow-up with medium-to-large effect sizes (d = 0.53-0.94). Limitations: These results should be interpreted with considerable caution, as there was no control group to establish the effectiveness of ABFT, and the sample was small. Conclusion: ABFT appears to be a feasible therapy for youth with depression and suicide ideation in an outpatient community mental health setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadia van der Spek
- Department of Psychiatry, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Research and Development, De Amsterdamse - Center for Couples and Family Therapy Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Child and Family Department, Arkin Jeugd & Gezin - Specialized Mental Health Care For Youth, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Willemieke Dekker
- Child and Family Department, Arkin Jeugd & Gezin - Specialized Mental Health Care For Youth, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jaap Peen
- Research Department, Arkin GGZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tara Santens
- Department of Clinical Psychology, KU Leuven, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pim Cuijpers
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, International Institute for Psychotherapy, Babeş-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Guy Bosmans
- Clinical Psychology Research Group, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jack Dekker
- Research Department, Arkin GGZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Ali R, Brown FL, Stevenson K, Jordans M, Taha K, Amine ME, Steen F, Meksassi B, Elias J, Aoun M, Roberts B, Sijbrandij M, Cuijpers P, Akhtar A, Malik A, Woodward A, Fuhr DC. Implementing a Non-Specialist Delivered Psychological Intervention for Young Adolescents in a Protracted Refugee Setting: a Qualitative Process Evaluation in Lebanon. J Behav Health Serv Res 2023:10.1007/s11414-023-09870-3. [PMID: 38087061 DOI: 10.1007/s11414-023-09870-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/06/2023] [Indexed: 02/12/2024]
Abstract
There has been an increase in the evaluation and implementation of non-specialist delivered psychological interventions to address unmet mental health needs in humanitarian emergencies. While randomized controlled trials (RCTs) provide important evidence about intervention impact, complementary qualitative process evaluations are essential to understand key implementation processes and inform future scaling up of the intervention. This study was conducted as part of an RCT of the Early Adolescents Skills for Emotions (EASE) psychological intervention for young adolescents with elevated psychological distress (predominantly with a Syrian refugee background) in Lebanon. Our aims were firstly to conduct a qualitative process evaluation to understand stakeholder experiences and perceived impact of the intervention and identify barriers and facilitators for implementation, and secondly to explore considerations for scaling up. Eleven key informant interviews and seven focus groups were conducted with 39 respondents including adolescent and caregiver participants, trainers, providers, outreach workers, and local stakeholders. Data were analyzed using inductive and deductive thematic analysis. Respondents perceived the intervention to be highly needed and reported improvements in adolescent mental health and wellbeing. Key implementation factors that have potential to influence engagement, adherence, and perceived impact included the socio-economic situation of families, mental health stigma, coordination within and between sectors (particularly for scaling up), embedding the intervention within existing service pathways, having clear quality and accountability processes including training and supervision for non-specialists, and sustainable funding. Our findings provide important context for understanding effectiveness outcomes of the RCT and highlights factors that need to be considered when implementing a mental health intervention on a larger scale in a complex crisis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rayane Ali
- Research and Development Department, War Child, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- War Child Lebanon, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Felicity L Brown
- Research and Development Department, War Child, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Institute of Social Science Research, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Kerrie Stevenson
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK
| | - Mark Jordans
- Research and Development Department, War Child, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Institute of Social Science Research, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Karine Taha
- Research and Development Department, War Child, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- War Child Lebanon, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Mounif El Amine
- Research and Development Department, War Child, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- War Child Lebanon, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Frederik Steen
- Research and Development Department, War Child, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bassel Meksassi
- Research and Development Department, War Child, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- War Child Lebanon, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Joseph Elias
- Research and Development Department, War Child, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- War Child Lebanon, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - May Aoun
- Research and Development Department, War Child, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- War Child Lebanon, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Bayard Roberts
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Marit Sijbrandij
- Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pim Cuijpers
- Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Aemal Akhtar
- School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Insurance Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Aiysha Malik
- Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Aniek Woodward
- KIT Royal Tropical Institute, KIT Health, Mauritskade 64, 1092 AD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Athena Institute, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Daniela C Fuhr
- Leibniz Institute of Prevention Research and Epidemiology, Bremen, Germany.
- Health Sciences, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Amanvermez Y, Karyotaki E, Cuijpers P, Ciharova M, Bruffaerts R, Kessler RC, Klein AM, Wiers RW, de Wit LM. Sources of stress among domestic and international students: a cross-sectional study of university students in Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Anxiety Stress Coping 2023:1-18. [PMID: 38047318 DOI: 10.1080/10615806.2023.2280701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2022] [Accepted: 11/02/2023] [Indexed: 12/05/2023]
Abstract
High perceived stress is associated with psychological and academic difficulties among college students. In this study, we aimed to investigate associations of student status (international vs domestic student in the Netherlands) with eight common sources of stress (i.e., financial, health, love life, relationship with family, relationship with people at work/ school, the health of loved ones, other problems of loved ones, and life in general). Participants were 2,196 college students (domestic: n = 1,642, international: n = 554) from two universities in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Hierarchical linear regression analyses were used to estimate associations of student status with all eight sources of stress. Student status was significantly associated with higher levels of perceived stress in almost all life domains. International student status was significantly associated with higher perceived stress in the domains of financial situation and health of loved ones after adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics, depressive and anxiety symptoms, and other sources of stress. Findings highlight that several differences exist in the magnitude of perceived stress in certain areas between international and domestic students in the Netherlands. Consequently, it is essential to uncover the different needs of college students and develop specific strategies to deliver the most suitable services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yagmur Amanvermez
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Eirini Karyotaki
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pim Cuijpers
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marketa Ciharova
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Black Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Ronny Bruffaerts
- Universitair Psychiatrisch Centrum - Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (UPC-KUL), Campus Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ronald C Kessler
- Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Anke M Klein
- Developmental and Educational Psychology of the Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Reinout W Wiers
- Addiction, Development, and Psychopathology (ADAPT) Lab, Department of Psychology, and Centre for Urban Mental Health, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Leonore M de Wit
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Benjet C, Albor Y, Alvis-Barranco L, Contreras-Ibáñez CC, Cuartas G, Cudris-Torres L, González N, Cortés-Morelos J, Gutierrez-Garcia RA, Medina-Mora ME, Patiño P, Vargas-Contreras E, Cuijpers P, Gildea SM, Kazdin AE, Kennedy CJ, Luedtke A, Sampson NA, Petukhova MV, Zainal NH, Kessler RC. Internet-delivered cognitive behavior therapy versus treatment as usual for anxiety and depression among Latin American university students: A randomized clinical trial. J Consult Clin Psychol 2023; 91:694-707. [PMID: 38032621 DOI: 10.1037/ccp0000846] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Untreated mental disorders are important among low- and middle-income country (LMIC) university students in Latin America, where barriers to treatment are high. Scalable interventions are needed. This study compared transdiagnostic self-guided and guided internet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy (i-CBT) with treatment as usual (TAU) for clinically significant anxiety and depression among undergraduates in Colombia and Mexico. METHOD 1,319 anxious, as determined by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) = 10+ and/or depressed, as determined by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) = 10+, undergraduates (mean [SD] age = 21.4 [3.2]); 78.7% female; 55.9% first-generation university student) from seven universities in Colombia and Mexico were randomized to culturally adapted versions of self-guided i-CBT (n = 439), guided i-CBT (n = 445), or treatment as usual (TAU; n = 435). All randomized participants were reassessed 3 months after randomization. The primary outcome was remission of both anxiety (GAD-7 = 0-4) and depression (PHQ-9 = 0-4). We hypothesized that remission would be higher with guided i-CBT than with the other interventions. RESULTS Intent-to-treat analysis found significantly higher adjusted (for university and loss to follow-up) remission rates (ARD) among participants randomized to guided i-CBT than either self-guided i-CBT (ARD = 13.1%, χ12 = 10.4, p = .001) or TAU (ARD = 11.2%, χ12 = 8.4, p = .004), but no significant difference between self-guided i-CBT and TAU (ARD = -1.9%, χ12 = 0.2, p = .63). Per-protocol sensitivity analyses and analyses of dimensional outcomes yielded similar results. CONCLUSIONS Significant reductions in anxiety and depression among LMIC university students could be achieved with guided i-CBT, although further research is needed to determine which students would most likely benefit from this intervention. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Corina Benjet
- Center for Global Mental Health, National Institute of Psychiatry Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz
| | - Yesica Albor
- Center for Global Mental Health, National Institute of Psychiatry Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz
| | | | | | - Gina Cuartas
- Departamento de la Coordinación de la Maestría en Psicología de la Salud, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia
| | | | - Noé González
- Center for Global Mental Health, National Institute of Psychiatry Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz
| | | | - Raúl A Gutierrez-Garcia
- Departamento de Psicología, Facultad de Estudios Superiores, Universidad De La Salle Bajío, Campus Salamanca
| | | | - Pamela Patiño
- Center for Global Mental Health, National Institute of Psychiatry Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz
| | - Eunice Vargas-Contreras
- Departamento de Psicología, Facultad de Ciencias Administrativas y Sociales, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California
| | - Pim Cuijpers
- Department of Clinical, Neuro-, and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
| | - Sarah M Gildea
- Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University
| | | | - Chris J Kennedy
- Department of Psychiatry, Center for Precision Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital
| | - Alex Luedtke
- Department of Statistics, University of Washington
| | - Nancy A Sampson
- Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University
| | - Maria V Petukhova
- Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University
| | - Nur Hani Zainal
- Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University
| | - Ronald C Kessler
- Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Cuijpers P, Kumar M, Karyotaki E. Climate Change and Mental Health-Time to Act Now. JAMA Psychiatry 2023; 80:1183-1184. [PMID: 37792381 DOI: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2023.3413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/05/2023]
Abstract
This Viewpoint discusses the lack of research on the impact of climate events on mental health, climate change–related inequalities in low- and middle-income countries, and the immediate need to act now.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pim Cuijpers
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Babeș-Bolyai University, International Institute for Psychotherapy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Manasi Kumar
- Department of Psychiatry University of Nairobi, Kenya, East Africa
- Brain and Mind Institute, Aga Khan University, Kenya, East Africa
| | - Eirini Karyotaki
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Alozkan-Sever C, Uppendahl JR, Cuijpers P, de Vries R, Rahman A, Mittendorfer-Rutz E, Akhtar A, Zheng Z, Sijbrandij M. Research Review: Psychological and psychosocial interventions for children and adolescents with depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder in low- and middle-income countries - a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2023; 64:1776-1788. [PMID: 37781856 DOI: 10.1111/jcpp.13891] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/13/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The incidence of depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among children and adolescents residing in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) poses a significant public health concern. However, there is variation in the evidence of effective psychological interventions. This meta-analysis aims to provide a complete overview of the current body of evidence in this rapidly evolving field. METHODS We conducted searches on PubMed, Embase.com, and EBSCO/APA PsycInfo databases up to June 23, 2022, identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effectiveness of psychological interventions in LMICs that targeted children and adolescents with elevated symptoms above a cut-off score for depression, anxiety, and PTSD, comparing a psychological or psychosocial intervention with other control conditions. We conducted random effects meta-analyses for depression, anxiety, and PTSD symptoms. Sensitivity analysis for outliers and high-risk studies, and analyses for the publication bias were carried out. Subgroup analyses investigated how the intervention type, intervention format, the facilitator, study design, and age group of the participant predicted effect sizes. RESULTS Thirty-one RCTs (6,123 participants) were included. We found a moderate effect of interventions on depression outcomes compared to the control conditions (g = 0.53; 95% CI: 0.06-0.99; NNT = 6.09) with a broad prediction interval (PI) (-1.8 to 2.86). We found a moderate to large effect for interventions on anxiety outcomes (g = 0.88; 95% CI: -0.03 to 1.79; NNT = 3.32) with a broad PI (-3.14 to 4.9). Additionally, a moderate effect was observed on PTSD outcomes (g = 0.54; 95% CI: 0.19-0.9; NNT = 5.86) with a broad PI (-0.64 to 1.72). CONCLUSIONS Psychological and psychosocial interventions aimed at addressing depression, anxiety, and PTSD among children and adolescents in LMICs have demonstrated promising results. However, future studies should consider the variation in evidence and incorporate long-term outcomes to better understand the effectiveness of these interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cansu Alozkan-Sever
- Department of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, WHO Collaborating Center for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jana R Uppendahl
- Chair of Social Pediatrics, TUM School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Pim Cuijpers
- Department of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, WHO Collaborating Center for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ralph de Vries
- Medical Library, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Atif Rahman
- Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Ellenor Mittendorfer-Rutz
- Division of Insurance Medicine, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Aemal Akhtar
- Division of Insurance Medicine, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Zhuoli Zheng
- Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Marit Sijbrandij
- Department of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, WHO Collaborating Center for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Tong L, Miguel C, Panagiotopoulou OM, Karyotaki E, Cuijpers P. Psychotherapy for adult depression in low- and middle-income countries: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol Med 2023; 53:7473-7483. [PMID: 37609800 PMCID: PMC10951412 DOI: 10.1017/s0033291723002246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2022] [Revised: 06/19/2023] [Accepted: 07/17/2023] [Indexed: 08/24/2023]
Abstract
Previous meta-analyses on psychotherapy for adult depression have found a larger treatment effect in non-Western trials compared to Western trials (i.e. North America, Europe, and Australia). However, factors contributing to this difference remain unclear. This study investigated different study characteristics between Western and non-Western trials and examined their association with effect size estimates. We systematically searched PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase, and Cochrane Library (01-09-2022). We included randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) that compared psychotherapy with a control condition. The validity of included RCTs was assessed by the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool (RoB 1). Effect sizes were pooled using the random-effects model. Subgroup analyses and meta-regressions were also conducted. We identified 405 eligible trials, among which 105 trials (117 comparisons, 16 304 participants) were from non-Western countries. We confirmed that non-Western trials had a larger treatment effect (g = 1.10, 95% CI 0.90-1.31) than Western trials (g = 0.57, 95% CI 0.52-0.62). Trials from non-Western countries also had more usual care controls, higher risk of bias, larger sample sizes, lower mean ages, younger adults, more group-based interventions, and other recruitment methods (e.g. systematic screening; p < 0.05). The larger effect sizes found in non-Western trials were related to the presence of wait-list controls, high risk of bias, cognitive-behavioral therapy, and clinician-diagnosed depression (p < 0.05). The larger treatment effects observed in non-Western trials may result from the high heterogeneous study design and relatively low validity. Further research on long-term effects, adolescent groups, and individual-level data are still needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lingyao Tong
- Department of Clinical, Neuro & Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Clara Miguel
- Department of Clinical, Neuro & Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Olga-Maria Panagiotopoulou
- Department of Clinical, Neuro & Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Eirini Karyotaki
- Department of Clinical, Neuro & Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Pim Cuijpers
- Department of Clinical, Neuro & Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Babeș-Bolyai University, International Institute for Psychotherapy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Ciharova M, Cuijpers P, Amanvermez Y, Riper H, Klein AM, Bolinski F, de Wit LM, van der Heijde CM, Bruffaerts R, Struijs S, Wiers RW, Karyotaki E. Use of tailoring features and reasons for dropout in a guided internet-based transdiagnostic individually-tailored cognitive behavioral therapy for symptoms of depression and/or anxiety in college students. Internet Interv 2023; 34:100646. [PMID: 38099094 PMCID: PMC10719529 DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2023.100646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2023] [Revised: 07/01/2023] [Accepted: 07/07/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Transdiagnostic individually-tailored digital interventions reduce symptoms of depression and anxiety in adults with moderate effects. However, research into these approaches for college students is scarce and contradicting. In addition, the exact reasons for intervention dropout in this target group are not well known, and the use of individually-tailored intervention features, such as optional modules, has not yet been explored. The current study aimed to (1) investigate reasons for dropout from a guided internet-based transdiagnostic individually-tailored intervention for college students assessed in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) and (2) evaluate whether participants used tailoring features intended for their baseline symptoms. A sample of college students with mild to moderate depression and/or anxiety symptoms (n = 48) in the Netherlands (partially) followed a guided internet-based transdiagnostic individually-tailored intervention. We contacted those who did not complete the entire intervention (n = 29) by phone to report the reasons for intervention dropout. Further, we descriptively explored the use of tailoring features (i.e., depression versus anxiety trajectory) and optional modules of the intervention in the whole sample. We identified a range of person- and intervention-related reasons for intervention dropout, most commonly busy schedules, needs for different kinds of help, or absence of personal contact. Furthermore, only less than half of the participants used the individually-tailoring features to address the symptoms they reported as predominant. In conclusion, digital interventions clear about the content and targeted symptoms, tested in user research could prevent dropout and create reasonable expectations of the intervention. Participants would benefit from additional guidance when using tailoring features of digital interventions, as they often do not choose the tailoring features targeting their baseline symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marketa Ciharova
- Department of Clinical, Neuro-, and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 7, BT 1081 Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 7, BT 1081 Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Pim Cuijpers
- Department of Clinical, Neuro-, and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 7, BT 1081 Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 7, BT 1081 Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- WHO Collaborating Center for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 7, BT 1081 Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Faculty of Medicine, Dept. of Psychiatry, University of Turku, FI-20014 Turun yliopisto, Finland
- Babeș-Bolyai University, International Institute for Psychotherapy, No.37, Republicii Street 400015, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Yagmur Amanvermez
- Department of Clinical, Neuro-, and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 7, BT 1081 Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 7, BT 1081 Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Heleen Riper
- Department of Clinical, Neuro-, and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 7, BT 1081 Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 7, BT 1081 Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Faculty of Medicine, Dept. of Psychiatry, University of Turku, FI-20014 Turun yliopisto, Finland
- Research Unit for Telepsychiatry and e-Mental Health, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsløws Vej 19,3, 5000 Odense, Denmark
- Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Anke M. Klein
- Developmental and Educational Psychology of the Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Rapenburg 70, 2311 EZ Leiden, the Netherlands
- Addiction, Development, and Psychopathology Lab, Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 129, 1001NK Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Felix Bolinski
- Department of Clinical, Neuro-, and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 7, BT 1081 Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 7, BT 1081 Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Mental Health and Prevention, Trimbos Institute, Da Costakade 45, 3521 VS Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Leonore M. de Wit
- Department of Clinical, Neuro-, and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 7, BT 1081 Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 7, BT 1081 Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Claudia M. van der Heijde
- Department of Research, Development and Prevention, Student Health Service, University of Amsterdam, Oude Turfmarkt 151, 1012 GC Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ronny Bruffaerts
- Universitair Psychiatrisch Centrum, Centre for Public Health Psychiatry, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sascha Struijs
- Department of Clinical, Neuro-, and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 7, BT 1081 Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 7, BT 1081 Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Reinout W. Wiers
- Addiction, Development, and Psychopathology Lab, Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 129, 1001NK Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Center for Urban Mental Health, Oude Turfmarkt 145-147, 1012 GC Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Eirini Karyotaki
- Department of Clinical, Neuro-, and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 7, BT 1081 Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 7, BT 1081 Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- WHO Collaborating Center for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 7, BT 1081 Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Cuijpers P, Harrer M, Miguel C, Ciharova M, Karyotaki E. Five decades of research on psychological treatments of depression: A historical and meta-analytic overview. Am Psychol 2023:2024-26478-001. [PMID: 37971844 DOI: 10.1037/amp0001250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
Since the 1970s, hundreds of randomized trials have examined the effects of psychotherapies for depression, and this number is increasing every year. In this study, we report outcomes from a living systematic review of these studies. We use Poisson regression analyses to examine if the proportions of studies have changed over time across the characteristics of the participants, therapies, and studies. We also present a meta-analysis of the effects across the major types, formats, targets, and age groups. We included 562 randomized controlled trials (669 comparisons; 66,361 patients). Most trials are conducted in adults and the relative proportion of trials in children and adolescents, as well as in older patients is significantly decreasing. The effects in children and adolescents are also significantly smaller than in adults (p = .007). Cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) is by far the best examined type of therapy (52%), but not necessarily more effective than other therapies. Over time, the proportion of studies examining several other types of therapy is significantly decreased compared to CBT. The quality of trials has increased over time, but still, a majority do not meet basic quality criteria, not even in recent years. The effects found in studies with low risk of bias are significantly smaller than in other studies (b = -0.21; SE = 0.05; p < .001). Most trials are conducted in the United States, but the proportion of studies in other parts of the world is rapidly increasing. The evidence that psychotherapies are effective is strong and growing every year. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pim Cuijpers
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
| | - Mathias Harrer
- Department of Psychology and Digital Mental Health Care, Technical University of Munich
| | - Clara Miguel
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
| | - Marketa Ciharova
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
| | - Eirini Karyotaki
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Amanvermez Y, Karyotaki E, Cuijpers P, Ciharova M, Donker M, Hurks P, Salemink E, Spinhoven P, Struijs S, de Wit LM. A Guided, Internet-Based Stress Management Intervention for University Students With High Levels of Stress: Feasibility and Acceptability Study. JMIR Form Res 2023; 7:e45725. [PMID: 37948106 PMCID: PMC10674149 DOI: 10.2196/45725] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2023] [Revised: 06/26/2023] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transitioning to adulthood and challenges in university life can result in increased stress levels among university students. Chronic and severe stress is associated with deleterious psychological and physiological effects. Digital interventions could succeed in approaching and helping university students who might be at risk; however, the experiences of students with internet-based stress management interventions are insufficiently understood. OBJECTIVE This study aims to explore the feasibility; acceptability; and changes in perceived stress, depressive symptoms, and quality of life from baseline to posttest assessment of a 5-session, internet-based stress management intervention guided by an e-coach, developed for university students experiencing high levels of stress. METHODS A single-arm study was conducted. Students were recruited from different channels, mainly from a web survey. Students were eligible if they (1) scored ≥20 on the Perceived Stress Scale-10, (2) were aged ≥18 years, and (3) were studying at one of the participating universities. Feasibility and acceptability of the intervention were investigated using several indications, including satisfaction (Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8) and usability (System Usability Scale-10). We also investigated the indicators of intervention adherence using use metrics (eg, the number of completed sessions). Our secondary goal was to explore the changes in perceived stress (Perceived Stress Scale-10), depressive symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), and quality of life (EQ-5D-5L scale) from baseline to posttest assessment. In addition, we conducted semistructured interviews with intervention completers and noncompleters to understand user experiences in depth. For all primary outcomes, descriptive statistics were calculated. Changes from baseline to posttest assessment were examined using 2-tailed paired sample t tests or the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Qualitative data were analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS Of 436 eligible students, 307 (70.4%) students started using the intervention. Overall, 25.7% (79/307) completed the core sessions (ie, sessions 1-3) and posttest assessment. A substantial proportion of the students (228/307, 74.3%) did not complete the core sessions or the posttest assessment. Students who completed the core sessions reported high satisfaction (mean 25.78, SD 3.30) and high usability of the intervention (mean 86.01, SD 10.25). Moreover, this group showed large reductions in perceived stress (Cohen d=0.80) and moderate improvements in depression score (Cohen d=0.47) and quality of life (Cohen d=-0.35) from baseline to posttest assessment. Qualitative findings highlight that several personal and intervention-related factors play a role in user experience. CONCLUSIONS The internet-based stress management intervention seems to be feasible, acceptable, and possibly effective for some university students with elevated stress levels. However, given the high dropout rate and qualitative findings, several adjustments in the content and features of the intervention are needed to maximize the user experience and the impact of the intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION Netherlands Trial Register 8686; https://onderzoekmetmensen.nl/nl/trial/20889. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) RR2-10.1016/j.invent.2021.100369.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yagmur Amanvermez
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands
| | - Eirini Karyotaki
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Pim Cuijpers
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marketa Ciharova
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Black Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Marianne Donker
- Department of Health Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Petra Hurks
- Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Elske Salemink
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | | | - Sascha Struijs
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Leonore M de Wit
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Ozmen S, Amarnath A, Struijs S, de Wit L, Cuijpers P. A Guided Web-Based Intervention Targeting Procrastination in College Students: Protocol for an Open Trial. JMIR Res Protoc 2023; 12:e44907. [PMID: 37921841 PMCID: PMC10656662 DOI: 10.2196/44907] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2022] [Revised: 05/22/2023] [Accepted: 06/15/2023] [Indexed: 11/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Academic procrastination is a widespread problem among college students. It is linked to poor academic performance and increased college dropout intentions, as well as several mental health problems such as depression, anxiety, and stress. Guided web-based interventions can help reduce procrastination. However, guidance by professional clinicians draws upon valuable and limited societal resources, and a more efficient, scalable form of guidance is needed. Guidance by trained clinical psychology students has not yet been examined. OBJECTIVE The aim of this open trial is to examine the feasibility and acceptability of a web-based procrastination intervention for college students under the guidance of student digital coaches (e-coaches). METHODS We developed a single-arm trial of a guided web-based intervention targeting procrastination for the Dutch student population. Guidance is delivered by trained clinical psychology students asynchronously in the form of textual feedback on intervention progress, with the aim of supporting and motivating the participant. Participants are recruited at 7 Dutch universities. Primary outcomes are intervention satisfaction, usability, and adherence, which are assessed by the Client Satisfaction Scale (CSQ-8), System Usability Scale (SUS-10), and number of completed modules, respectively. The primary outcomes will be examined by calculating descriptive statistics. Secondary outcomes are e-coach satisfaction and changes to procrastination, depression, stress, and quality of life from pre- to posttest and follow-up. RESULTS The project was funded in 2019, and recruitment began in January 2021. As of May 2023, a total of 985 participants were enrolled, of which 372 had completed the posttest and 192 had completed the follow-up. The expected date of analysis and publication of the results is 2024. CONCLUSIONS The results are expected to contribute to the body of literature regarding eHealth in 3 ways. First, we will examine whether students who procrastinate adhere to and are satisfied with an eHealth intervention targeting this problem. Second, we will explore whether an intervention targeting procrastination can also decrease depression and stress. Lastly, we will investigate whether trained psychology students can effectively guide their peers in web-based interventions. Given the shortage of licensed psychologists, exploring alternative sources of guidance is much needed in order to provide students with the mental health support they need. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/44907.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sevin Ozmen
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Arpana Amarnath
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Sascha Struijs
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Leonore de Wit
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Pim Cuijpers
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Papola D, Karyotaki E, Purgato M, Sijbrandij M, Tedeschi F, Cuijpers P, Orestis E, Furukawa TA, Patel V, Barbui C. Dismantling and personalising task-sharing psychosocial interventions for common mental disorders: a study protocol for an individual participant data component network meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e077037. [PMID: 37918937 PMCID: PMC10626809 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2023] [Accepted: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 11/04/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Common mental disorders, including depression, anxiety and related somatic health symptoms, are leading causes of disability worldwide. Especially in low-resource settings, psychosocial interventions delivered by non-specialist providers through task-sharing modalities proved to be valid options to expand access to mental healthcare. However, such interventions are usually eclectic multicomponent interventions consisting of different combinations of evidence-based therapeutic strategies. Which of these various components (or combinations thereof) are more efficacious (and for whom) to reduce common mental disorder symptomatology is yet to be substantiated by evidence. METHODS AND ANALYSIS Comprehensive search was performed in electronic databases MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials-CENTRAL from database inception to 15 March 2023 to systematically identify all randomised controlled trials that compared any single component or multicomponent psychosocial intervention delivered through the task-sharing modality against any active or inactive control condition in the treatment of adults suffering from common mental disorders. From these trials, individual participant data (IPD) of all measured outcomes and covariates will be collected. We will dismantle psychosocial interventions creating a taxonomy of components and then apply the IPD component network meta-analysis (IPD-cNMA) methodology to assess the efficacy of individual components (or combinations thereof) according to participant-level prognostic factors and effect modifiers. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethics approval is not applicable for this study since no original data will be collected. Results from this study will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at relevant conferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Davide Papola
- Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Mental Health and Service Evaluation, Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Science, Section of Psychiatry, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Eirini Karyotaki
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marianna Purgato
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Mental Health and Service Evaluation, Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Science, Section of Psychiatry, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Marit Sijbrandij
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Federico Tedeschi
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Mental Health and Service Evaluation, Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Science, Section of Psychiatry, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Pim Cuijpers
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Efthimiou Orestis
- Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Toshi A Furukawa
- Department of Health Promotion and Human Behavior, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine/School of Public Health, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Vikram Patel
- Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Corrado Barbui
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Mental Health and Service Evaluation, Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Science, Section of Psychiatry, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Spaaij J, de Graaff AM, Akhtar A, Kiselev N, McDaid D, Moergeli H, Pfaltz MC, Schick M, Schnyder U, Bryant RA, Cuijpers P, Sijbrandij M, Morina N. The effect of a low-level psychological intervention (PM+) on post-migration living difficulties - Results from two studies in Switzerland and in the Netherlands. Compr Psychiatry 2023; 127:152421. [PMID: 37708580 DOI: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2023.152421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2023] [Revised: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 09/16/2023] Open
Abstract
AIMS OF THE STUDY After arriving in host countries, most refugees are confronted with numerous post-migration stressors (e.g., separation from family, discrimination, and employment difficulties). Post-migration living difficulties (PMLDs) significantly contribute to the development and persistence of mental disorders. Effective treatment approaches focusing on reducing post-migration stress are urgently needed. The aim of the present study was to examine the effect of a brief psychological intervention, Problem Management Plus (PM+), on PMLDs among Syrian refugees in two European countries. METHODS We merged data from two single-blind feasibility trials with Syrian refugees experiencing elevated levels of psychological distress and impaired functioning in Switzerland (N = 59) and the Netherlands (N = 60). Participants were randomised to receive either five sessions of PM+ or an enhanced care-as-usual control condition. PMLDs were assessed at baseline and 3 months after the intervention. To estimate treatment effect on PMLD, linear mixed model analysis was performed. RESULTS Three months after the intervention, participants in the PM+ condition reported significantly fewer PMLDs compared to the control condition. Further analyses at item-level showed that interpersonal and family related PMLDs, such as "worries about family back home" significantly improved over time in the PM+ condition. CONCLUSIONS This exploratory study suggests that brief psychological interventions have the potential to reduce PMLDs in refugees and asylum seekers. The reduction of post-migration stress in turn may subsequently lead to an overall reduction in psychological distress. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBERS BASEC Nr. 2017-0117 (Swiss trial) and NL61361.029.17, 7 September 2017 (Dutch trial).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Spaaij
- Department of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Anne M de Graaff
- Department of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, and WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Aemal Akhtar
- School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia; Division of Insurance Medicine, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden
| | - Nikolai Kiselev
- Department of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; PluSport, Umbrella Organization of Swiss Disabled Sports, Volketswil, Switzerland; Swiss Research Institute of Public Health and Addiction (ISGF), University of Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - David McDaid
- Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, United Kingdom
| | - Hanspeter Moergeli
- Department of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Monique C Pfaltz
- Department of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Mid Sweden University, Department of Psychology and Social Work, Östersund, Sweden
| | - Matthis Schick
- Department of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Richard A Bryant
- School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Pim Cuijpers
- Department of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, and WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marit Sijbrandij
- Department of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, and WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Naser Morina
- Department of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Guertler D, Krause K, Moehring A, Bischof G, Batra A, Freyer-Adam J, Ulbricht S, Rumpf HJ, Wurm S, Cuijpers P, Lucht M, John U, Meyer C. E-Health intervention for subthreshold depression: Reach and two-year effects of a randomized controlled trial. J Affect Disord 2023; 339:33-42. [PMID: 37392942 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.06.059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2023] [Revised: 06/19/2023] [Accepted: 06/26/2023] [Indexed: 07/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is evidence for e-Health interventions for full-blown depression. Little is known regarding commonly untreated subthreshold depression in primary care. This randomized controlled multi-centre trial assessed reach and two-year-effects of a proactive e-Health intervention (ActiLife) for patients with subthreshold depression. METHODS Primary care and hospital patients were screened for subthreshold depression. Over 6 months, ActiLife participants received three individualized feedback letters and weekly messages promoting self-help strategies against depression, e.g., dealing with unhelpful thoughts or behavioural activation. The primary outcome depressive symptom severity (Patient Health Questionnaire;PHQ-8) and secondary outcomes were assessed 6, 12 and 24 months. RESULTS Of those invited, n = 618(49.2 %) agreed to participate. Of them, 456 completed the baseline interview and were randomized to ActiLife (n = 227) or assessment only (n = 226). Generalised estimation equation analyses adjusting for site, setting and baseline depression revealed that depressive symptom severity declined over time, with no significant group differences at 6 (mean difference = 0.47 points; d = 0.12) and 24 months (mean difference = -0.05 points; d = -0.01). Potential adverse effects were observed at 12 months, with higher depressive symptom severity for ActiLife than control participants (mean difference = 1.33 points; d = 0.35). No significant differences in rates of reliable deterioration or reliable improvement of depressive symptoms were observed. ActiLife increased applied self-help strategies at 6 (mean difference = 0.32; d = 0.27) and 24 months (mean difference = 0.22; d = 0.19), but not at 12 months (mean difference = 0.18; d = 0.15). LIMITATIONS Self-report measures and lack of information on patients' mental health treatment. DISCUSSION ActiLife yielded satisfactory reach and increased the use of self-help strategies. Data were inconclusive in terms of depressive symptom changes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Guertler
- Institute for Community Medicine, Department of Prevention Research and Social Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany; DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Greifswald, Germany.
| | - K Krause
- Evangelic Hospital Bethania, Greifswald, Germany
| | - A Moehring
- DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Greifswald, Germany; Institute for Community Medicine, Department of Methods in Community Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - G Bischof
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - A Batra
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - J Freyer-Adam
- DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Greifswald, Germany; Institute for Medical Psychology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - S Ulbricht
- Institute for Community Medicine, Department of Prevention Research and Social Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany; DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Greifswald, Germany
| | - H J Rumpf
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - S Wurm
- Institute for Community Medicine, Department of Prevention Research and Social Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - P Cuijpers
- Department of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Institute, and WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M Lucht
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy at Helios Hanseklinikum Stralsund, Stralsund, Germany; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - U John
- Institute for Community Medicine, Department of Prevention Research and Social Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany; DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Greifswald, Germany
| | - C Meyer
- Institute for Community Medicine, Department of Prevention Research and Social Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany; DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Greifswald, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Cuijpers P, Miguel C, Ciharova M, Harrer M, Moir F, Roskvist R, van Straten A, Karyotaki E, Arroll B. Psychological treatment of adult depression in primary care compared with outpatient mental health care: A meta-analysis. J Affect Disord 2023; 339:660-675. [PMID: 37467801 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.07.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2023] [Revised: 06/05/2023] [Accepted: 07/08/2023] [Indexed: 07/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is not yet known whether psychological treatments of depression in primary care have comparable effects to treatments in specialized mental health care. We conducted a meta-analysis comparing randomized controlled trials in primary and specialized care. METHODS We selected studies from an existing database of randomized trials of psychological treatments of depression in adults, which was built through searches in PubMed, PsychINFO, Embase and the Cochrane Library. Random effects meta-analyses were conducted to examine the effects of therapies and mixed effects subgroup analyses were used to compare the effects in primary and specialized care. RESULTS We included 52 trials (7984 patients) in primary care and compared them with 50 trials (3685 patients) in specialized care. The main effect of therapies in primary care was g = 0.43 (95 % CI: 0.32; 0.53; PI: -0.18; 1.03). The overall effects were significantly smaller than those in specialized care (p = 0.006), but this was no longer significant after adjustment for differences between the two settings. The proportion of patients responding to treatment was comparable in primary (0.38; 95 % CI: 0.33; 0.43) and specialized care (0.34; 95 % CI: 0.28; 0.41; p = 0.41), but higher in control conditions in primary care (0.25; 95 % CI: 0.22; 0.28) compared to specialized care (0.16; 95 % CI: 0.12; 0.20; p < 0.001). DISCUSSION Psychological treatments are effective in primary care, but somewhat less than in specialized care. Response rates in control conditions in primary care are higher than in specialized care, which may point at a transient nature of depression in primary care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pim Cuijpers
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Babeș-Bolyai University, International Institute for Psychotherapy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
| | - Clara Miguel
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marketa Ciharova
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mathias Harrer
- Psychology & Digital Mental Health Care, Technische Universität München, Germany; Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, Universität Erlangen-, Nürnberg, Germany
| | - Fiona Moir
- Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Rachel Roskvist
- Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Annemieke van Straten
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Eirini Karyotaki
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bruce Arroll
- Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Bosmans JE, Bruijniks SJE, El Alili M, Hollon SD, Peeters FPML, Arntz A, Cuijpers P, Lemmens LHJM, Dingemanse P, Willems L, van Oppen P, van den Boogaard M, Spijker J, Twisk JWR, Huibers MJH. Cost-effectiveness of twice-weekly versus once-weekly sessions of cognitive-behavioural therapy and interpersonal psychotherapy for depression at 12 months after start of treatment: randomised controlled trial. BJPsych Open 2023; 9:e186. [PMID: 37830493 PMCID: PMC10594223 DOI: 10.1192/bjo.2023.548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2022] [Revised: 07/11/2023] [Accepted: 07/13/2023] [Indexed: 10/14/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cost-effective treatments are needed to reduce the burden of depression. One way to improve the cost-effectiveness of psychotherapy might be to increase session frequency, but keep the total number of sessions constant. AIM To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of twice-weekly compared with once-weekly psychotherapy sessions after 12 months, from a societal perspective. METHOD An economic evaluation was conducted alongside a randomised controlled trial comparing twice-weekly versus once-weekly sessions of psychotherapy (cognitive-behavioural therapy or interpersonal psychotherapy) for depression. Missing data were handled by multiple imputation. Statistical uncertainty was estimated with bootstrapping and presented with cost-effectiveness acceptability curves. RESULTS Differences between the two groups in depressive symptoms, physical and social functioning, and quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) at 12-month follow-up were small and not statistically significant. Total societal costs in the twice-weekly session group were higher, albeit not statistically significantly so, than in the once-weekly session group (mean difference €2065, 95% CI -686 to 5146). The probability that twice-weekly sessions are cost-effective compared with once-weekly sessions was 0.40 at a ceiling ratio of €1000 per point improvement in Beck Depression Inventory-II score, 0.32 at a ceiling ratio of €50 000 per QALY gained, 0.23 at a ceiling ratio of €1000 per point improvement in physical functioning score and 0.62 at a ceiling ratio of €1000 per point improvement in social functioning score. CONCLUSIONS Based on the current results, twice-weekly sessions of psychotherapy for depression are not cost-effective over the long term compared with once-weekly sessions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judith E. Bosmans
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sanne J. E. Bruijniks
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Freiburg, Germany; and Department of Clinical Psychology, Utrecht University, The Netherlands
| | - Mohamed El Alili
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Frenk P. M. L. Peeters
- Department of Clinical Psychological Science, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, The Netherlands
| | - Arnoud Arntz
- Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pim Cuijpers
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lotte H. J. M. Lemmens
- Department of Clinical Psychological Science, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, The Netherlands
| | - Pieter Dingemanse
- Division of Affective Disorders, Mental Health Care Altrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Linda Willems
- Department of Mood Disorders, GGZ Oost-Brabant, The Netherlands
| | - Patricia van Oppen
- Department of Research and Innovation, GGZ InGeest Specialized Mental Health Care, The Netherlands; and Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Jan Spijker
- Depression Expertise Centre, Pro Persona Mental Health Care, The Netherlands; and Behavioral Science Institute, Radboud University, The Netherlands
| | - Jos W. R. Twisk
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marcus J. H. Huibers
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Freiburg, Germany; and Department of Clinical Psychology, Utrecht University, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Mu J, Ravindran AV, Cuijpers P, Shen Y, Yang W, Li Q, Zhou X, Xie P. Stroke depression: a concept with clinical applicability. Stroke Vasc Neurol 2023:svn-2022-002146. [PMID: 37793901 DOI: 10.1136/svn-2022-002146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2022] [Accepted: 09/06/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Stroke is a common neurological condition and among the leading causes of death and disability worldwide. Depression is both a risk factor for and complication of stroke, and the two conditions may have a complex reciprocal relationship over time. However, the secondary effects of depression on stroke are often overlooked, resulting in increased morbidity and mortality. In the previous concept of 'poststroke depression', stroke and depression were considered as two independent diseases. It often delays the diagnosis and treatment of patients. The concept 'stroke depression' proposed in this article will emphasise more the necessity of aggressive treatment of depression in the overall management of stroke, thus to reduce the incidence of stroke and in the meantime, improve the prognosis of stroke. Hopefully, it will lead us into a new era of acute stroke intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Mu
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Arun V Ravindran
- Campbell Family Mental Health Research Centre, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health; Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Pim Cuijpers
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Yiqing Shen
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
- NHC Key Laboratory of Diagnosis and Treatment on Brain Functional Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Wensong Yang
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Qi Li
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Xinyu Zhou
- Department of Psychiatry, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Peng Xie
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
- NHC Key Laboratory of Diagnosis and Treatment on Brain Functional Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
van de Kamp MM, Scheffers M, Emck C, Fokker TJ, Hatzmann J, Cuijpers P, Beek PJ. Body-and movement-oriented interventions for posttraumatic stress disorder: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. J Trauma Stress 2023; 36:835-848. [PMID: 37702005 DOI: 10.1002/jts.22968] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2023] [Revised: 06/29/2023] [Accepted: 06/29/2023] [Indexed: 09/14/2023]
Abstract
This study is an update of the meta-analysis we published in 2019 on the effectiveness of body- and movement-oriented interventions (BMOIs) for adults with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in decreasing PTSD symptoms and secondary outcomes of depressive symptoms, sleep disturbance, and interoceptive awareness. Search terms for BMOIs and PTSD were combined to identify eligible studies in four bibliographical databases. Articles were selected if they included adult participants with a primary diagnosis of PTSD, included BMOI as one of the investigated therapies, were designed as a comparative outcome trial with any control condition, and involved a standardized outcome measure for PTSD symptom severity. This resulted in the addition of 14 new studies compared to the 2019 study. The meta-analysis, which included 29 studies in total, resulted in a mean Hedges' g effect size of 0.50, 95% CI [0.22, 0.79], in decreasing PTSD symptoms, with very high heterogeneity, I2 = 89%. Meta-analyses of secondary outcomes resulted in Hedges' g effect sizes of 0.37, 95% CI [0.08, 0.66] for depressive symptoms; 0.62, 95% CI [0.42, 0.81] for sleep quality; and -0.10, 95% CI [-0.23, 0.43] for interoceptive awareness. The risk of bias analysis resulted in some concerns or high risk of bias in almost all included studies; only one study had a low risk of bias. We conclude that BMOIs may be valuable for patients with PTSD. There is, however, still a lack of high-quality studies with proper control conditions and long-term follow-up periods from which to draw conclusions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minke M van de Kamp
- Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mia Scheffers
- School of Health, Movement & Education, Windesheim University of Applied Sciences, Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | - Claudia Emck
- Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ties J Fokker
- Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Janneke Hatzmann
- School of Health, Movement & Education, Windesheim University of Applied Sciences, Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | - Pim Cuijpers
- Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Peter J Beek
- Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Kiekens G, Claes L, Hasking P, Mortier P, Bootsma E, Boyes M, Myin-Germeys I, Demyttenaere K, Cuijpers P, Kessler RC, Nock MK, Bruffaerts R. A longitudinal investigation of non-suicidal self-injury persistence patterns, risk factors, and clinical outcomes during the college period. Psychol Med 2023; 53:6011-6026. [PMID: 36325723 DOI: 10.1017/s0033291722003178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) is known typically to begin in adolescence, longitudinal information is lacking about patterns, predictors, and clinical outcomes of NSSI persistence among emerging adults. The present study was designed to (1) estimate NSSI persistence during the college period, (2) identify risk factors and high-risk students for NSSI persistence patterns, and (3) evaluate the association with future mental disorders and suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STB). METHODS Using prospective cohorts from the Leuven College Surveys (n = 5915), part of the World Mental Health International College Student Initiative, web-based surveys assessed mental health and psychosocial problems at college entrance and three annual follow-up assessments. RESULTS Approximately one in five (20.4%) students reported lifetime NSSI at college entrance. NSSI persistence was estimated at 56.4%, with 15.6% reporting a high-frequency repetitive pattern (≥five times yearly). Many hypothesized risk factors were associated with repetitive NSSI persistence, with the most potent effects observed for pre-college NSSI characteristics. Multivariate models suggest that an intervention focusing on the 10-20% at the highest predicted risk could effectively reach 34.9-56.7% of students with high-frequency repetitive NSSI persistence (PPV = 81.8-93.4, AUC = 0.88-0.91). Repetitive NSSI persistence during the first two college years predicted 12-month mental disorders, role impairment, and STB during the third college year, including suicide attempts. CONCLUSIONS Most emerging adults with a history of NSSI report persistent self-injury during their college years. Web-based screening may be a promising approach for detecting students at risk for a highly persistent NSSI pattern characterized by subsequent adverse outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Glenn Kiekens
- Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Center for Contextual Psychiatry, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Laurence Claes
- Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences (CAPRI), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Penelope Hasking
- Curtin enAble Institute & School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
| | - Philippe Mortier
- Health Services Research Unit, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER en Epidemiología y Salud Pública, Madrid, Spain
| | - Erik Bootsma
- Laboratory of Molecular Bacteriology, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Rega Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- The KU Leuven - VIB Center for Microbiology, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Mark Boyes
- Curtin enAble Institute & School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
| | | | | | - Pim Cuijpers
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ronald C Kessler
- Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Matthew K Nock
- Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Ronny Bruffaerts
- Center for Public Health Psychiatry, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Institute for Social Research, Population Studies Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Wu Y, Sun Y, Liu Y, Levis B, Krishnan A, He C, Neupane D, Patten SB, Cuijpers P, Ziegelstein RC, Benedetti A, Thombs BD. Depression screening tool accuracy individual participant data meta-analyses: data contribution was associated with multiple factors. J Clin Epidemiol 2023; 162:63-71. [PMID: 37619800 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Revised: 08/12/2023] [Accepted: 08/16/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To examine the proportion of eligible primary studies that contributed data, study characteristics associated with data contribution, and reasons for noncontribution using diagnostic test accuracy Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis (IPDMA) data sets from the DEPRESsion Screening Data project. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING We reviewed data set contributions from four IPDMAs. A multivariable logistic regression model was fitted to evaluate study factors associated with data contribution. RESULTS Of 456 eligible studies from four included IPDMAs, 295 (65%) contributed data. More recent year of publication and higher journal impact factor were associated with greater odds of data contribution. Studies conducted in Europe (excluding the United Kingdom), Oceania, Canada, the Middle East, Africa, and Central or South America (reference = the United States), that have recruitment from inpatient care or nonmedical settings (reference = outpatient), that reported screening accuracy results, or that drew negative conclusions (reference = positive conclusions) were more likely to contribute data. Studies of the Geriatric Depression Scale (reference = the Patient Health Questionnaire) or lacking funding information were negatively associated with data contribution. Over 80% of noncontributions were due to authors being unreachable or data being unavailable. CONCLUSION The study identified factors associated with data contribution that may support future research to promote data contribution to IPDMAs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yin Wu
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Ying Sun
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Yi Liu
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Brooke Levis
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Centre for Prognosis Research, School of Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK
| | - Ankur Krishnan
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Chen He
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Dipika Neupane
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Scott B Patten
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Pim Cuijpers
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Roy C Ziegelstein
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Andrea Benedetti
- Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Respiratory Epidemiology and Clinical Research Unit, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Brett D Thombs
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Department of Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Department of Educational and Counselling Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Biomedical Ethics Unit, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Driessen E, Fokkema M, Dekker JJM, Peen J, Van HL, Maina G, Rosso G, Rigardetto S, Cuniberti F, Vitriol VG, Andreoli A, Burnand Y, López Rodríguez J, Villamil Salcedo V, Twisk JWR, Wienicke FJ, Cuijpers P. Which patients benefit from adding short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy to antidepressants in the treatment of depression? A systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data. Psychol Med 2023; 53:6090-6101. [PMID: 36404677 PMCID: PMC10520584 DOI: 10.1017/s0033291722003270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2022] [Revised: 09/29/2022] [Accepted: 09/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adding short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy (STPP) to antidepressants increases treatment efficacy, but it is unclear which patients benefit specifically. This study examined efficacy moderators of combined treatment (STPP + antidepressants) v. antidepressants for adults with depression. METHODS For this systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42017056029), we searched PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase.com, and the Cochrane Library from inception to 1 January 2022. We included randomized clinical trials comparing combined treatment (antidepressants + individual outpatient STPP) v. antidepressants in the acute-phase treatment of depression in adults. Individual participant data were requested and analyzed combinedly using mixed-effects models (adding Cochrane risk of bias items as covariates) and an exploratory machine learning technique. The primary outcome was post-treatment depression symptom level. RESULTS Data were obtained for all seven trials identified (100%, n = 482, combined: n = 238, antidepressants: n = 244). Adding STPP to antidepressants was more efficacious for patients with high rather than low baseline depression levels [B = -0.49, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.61 to -0.37, p < 0.0001] and for patients with a depressive episode duration of >2 years rather than <1 year (B = -0.68, 95% CI -1.31 to -0.05, p = 0.03) and than 1-2 years (B = -0.86, 95% CI -1.66 to -0.06, p = 0.04). Heterogeneity was low. Effects were replicated in analyses controlling for risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS To our knowledge, this is the first study that examines moderators across trials assessing the addition of STPP to antidepressants. These findings need validation but suggest that depression severity and episode duration are factors to consider when adding STPP to antidepressants and might contribute to personalizing treatment selection for depression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellen Driessen
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands
- Depression Expertise Centre, Pro Persona Mental Health Care, Nijmegen, Netherlands
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marjolein Fokkema
- Department of Methodology and Statistics, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Jack J M Dekker
- Department of Research, Arkin Mental Health Care, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Jaap Peen
- Department of Research, Arkin Mental Health Care, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Giuseppe Maina
- Department of Neuroscience 'Rita Levi Montalcini', University of Turin, Turin, Italy
- Psychiatric Unit, San Luigi Gonzaga University Hospital of Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Gianluca Rosso
- Department of Neuroscience 'Rita Levi Montalcini', University of Turin, Turin, Italy
- Psychiatric Unit, San Luigi Gonzaga University Hospital of Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Sylvia Rigardetto
- Psychiatric Unit, San Luigi Gonzaga University Hospital of Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Francesco Cuniberti
- Department of Neuroscience 'Rita Levi Montalcini', University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Jos W R Twisk
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Frederik J Wienicke
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Pim Cuijpers
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Affiliation(s)
- Pim Cuijpers
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research institute, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; International Institute for Psychotherapy, Babes,-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Karyotaki E, Miguel C, Panagiotopoulou OM, Harrer M, Seward N, Sijbrandij M, Araya R, Patel V, Cuijpers P. Digital interventions for common mental disorders in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Glob Ment Health (Camb) 2023; 10:e68. [PMID: 38024798 PMCID: PMC10643260 DOI: 10.1017/gmh.2023.50] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Revised: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 09/02/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background In low-resource settings, e-mental health may substantially increase access to evidence-based interventions for common mental disorders. We conducted a systematic literature search to identify randomised trials examining the effects of digital interventions with or without therapeutic guidance compared to control conditions in individuals with anxiety and/or depression symptoms in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Methods The main outcome was the reduction in symptoms at the post-test. Secondary outcomes included improvements in quality of life and longer-term effects (≥20 weeks post-randomisation). The effect size Hedges' g was calculated using the random effects model. Results A total of 21 studies (23 comparisons) with 5.296 participants were included. Digital interventions were more effective than controls in reducing symptoms of common mental disorders at the post-test (g = -0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.26 to -0.52, p < 0.001; NNT = 2.91). These significant effects were confirmed when examining depressive (g = -0.77, 95% CI -1.11; -0.44) and anxiety symptoms separately (g = -1.02, 95% CI -1.53 to -0.52) and across all other sensitivity analyses. Digital interventions also resulted in a small but significant effect in improving quality of life (g = 0.32, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.45) at the post-test. Over the longer term, the effects were smaller but remained significant for all examined outcomes. Heterogeneity was moderate to high in all analyses. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses did not result in significant outcomes in any of the examined variables (e.g., guided vs. unguided interventions). Conclusions Digital interventions, with or without guidance, may effectively bridge the gap between treatment supply and demand in LMICs. Nevertheless, more studies are needed to draw firm conclusions regarding the magnitude of the effects of digital interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eirini Karyotaki
- Department of Clinical, Neuro-, and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Clara Miguel
- Department of Clinical, Neuro-, and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Olga M. Panagiotopoulou
- Department of Clinical, Neuro-, and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mathias Harrer
- Psychology & Digital Mental Health Care, Department of Health Sciences, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Nadine Seward
- Center for Global Mental Health and Primary Care Research, Health Service and Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Marit Sijbrandij
- Department of Clinical, Neuro-, and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ricardo Araya
- Center for Global Mental Health and Primary Care Research, Health Service and Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Vikram Patel
- Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Pim Cuijpers
- Department of Clinical, Neuro-, and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Augustinavicius J, Purgato M, Tedeschi F, Musci R, Leku MR, Carswell K, Lakin D, van Ommeren M, Cuijpers P, Sijbrandij M, Karyotaki E, Tol WA, Barbui C. Prevention and promotion effects of Self Help Plus: secondary analysis of cluster randomised controlled trial data among South Sudanese refugee women in Uganda. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e048043. [PMID: 37699637 PMCID: PMC10503328 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2020] [Accepted: 10/26/2022] [Indexed: 09/14/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Evidence-based and scalable prevention and promotion focused mental health and psychosocial support interventions are needed for conflict-affected populations in humanitarian settings. This study retrospectively assessed whether participation in Self Help Plus (SH+) versus enhanced usual care (EUC) resulted in reduced incidence of probable mental disorder and increased positive mental health and well-being post-intervention among South Sudanese refugee women in Uganda. METHODS This study used secondary data from treatment-oriented pilot (n=50) and fully-powered cluster randomised controlled trials (cRCT)s (n=694) of SH+ versus EUC. Data from baseline and post-intervention assessments were combined. A composite latent indicator for mental health problems was generated using mental health and well-being measures included in both cRCTs. In order to assess incidence, a binary variable approximating probable mental disorder was created to exclude those with probable mental disorder from the analysis sample and as the primary prevention outcome. The promotive effects of SH+ relative to EUC were examined in the same sample by assessing subjective well-being and psychological flexibility scale scores. RESULTS A single factor for mental health problems was identified with all factor loadings >0.30 and acceptable internal consistency (α=0.70). We excluded 161 women who met criteria for probable mental disorder at baseline. Among those with at least moderate psychological distress but without probable mental disorder at baseline and with follow-up data (n=538), the incidence of probable mental disorder at post-intervention was lower among those who participated in SH+ relative to EUC (Risk ratio =0.16, 95% CI: 0.05 to 0.53). Participation in SH+ versus EUC was also associated with increased subjective well-being (β=2.62, 95% CI: 1.63 to 3.60) and psychological flexibility (β=4.55, 95% CI: 2.92 to 6.18) at post-intervention assessment. CONCLUSIONS These results support the use and further testing of SH+ as a selective and indicated prevention and promotion focused psychosocial intervention in humanitarian settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN50148022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jura Augustinavicius
- School of Population and Global Health, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Mental Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Marianna Purgato
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Mental Health and Service Evaluation, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine, and Movement Sciences, Section of Psychiatry, University of Verona, Verona, Veneto, Italy
- Cochrane Global Mental Health, University of Verona, Verona, Veneto, Italy
| | - Federico Tedeschi
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Mental Health and Service Evaluation, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine, and Movement Sciences, Section of Psychiatry, University of Verona, Verona, Veneto, Italy
- Cochrane Global Mental Health, University of Verona, Verona, Veneto, Italy
| | - Rashelle Musci
- Department of Mental Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Kenneth Carswell
- Department of Mental Health and Substance Use, World Health Organization, Geneve, Switzerland
| | - Daniel Lakin
- Department of Mental Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Mark van Ommeren
- Department of Mental Health and Substance Use, World Health Organization, Geneve, Switzerland
| | - Pim Cuijpers
- Department of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, Section of Clinical Psychology, Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- WHO Collaborating Center for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions and Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marit Sijbrandij
- Department of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, Section of Clinical Psychology, Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- WHO Collaborating Center for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions and Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Eirini Karyotaki
- Department of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, Section of Clinical Psychology, Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- WHO Collaborating Center for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions and Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Wietse A Tol
- Global Health Section, University of Copenhagen, Kobenhavn, Denmark
- Athena Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- HealthRight International, New York city, New York, USA
| | - Corrado Barbui
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Mental Health and Service Evaluation, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine, and Movement Sciences, Section of Psychiatry, University of Verona, Verona, Veneto, Italy
- Cochrane Global Mental Health, University of Verona, Verona, Veneto, Italy
| |
Collapse
|