Stem Cell Transplantation for Multiple Sclerosis: A 2023 Review of Published Studies

This comprehensive literature review underscores the potential of stem cell transplantation (SCT) as a therapeutic intervention for multiple sclerosis (MS). By amalgamating evidence from various sources, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs), observational, retrospective, and comparative studies, this review offers a holistic understanding of SCT's effectiveness, safety, and feasibility in diverse contexts of MS management. SCT has shown promise in mitigating disease activity and progression, particularly in relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS). RCTs like the high dose immunoablation and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in MS (ASTIMS) versus mitoxantrone therapy in severe multiple sclerosis and multiple sclerosis international stem cell transplant (MIST) trials reveal SCT's capacity to reduce new lesion occurrences and inflammatory activity. However, variability exists in disability score improvements among these studies. Observational and retrospective investigations further affirm SCT's potential, highlighting decreased relapse rates, enhanced expanded disability status scale (EDSS) scores, and a noteworthy proportion of patients achieving no evidence of disease activity (NEDA). The initial literature search using all of the search items produced a total of 3,636 articles. After title, abstract, and article type screening and article retrieving, 147 articles were assessed for eligibility using the inclusion criteria. At the end of the literature search, 37 articles met the eligibility criteria. They were included in our review according to preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Patients treated with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) present lower progression and relapse rates, suppression of inflammatory activity, and a greater reduction in T2 lesions on MRI than those treated with disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). In summary, while SCT presents promise as a therapeutic option for MS, its deployment should be tailored to individual patient characteristics, disease stages, and responses.

Unraveling the Complexity of Multicentric Gliomas: Insights Into Chronicity and Genetic Aberrations

Gliomas are among the most common primary tumors of the brain. Discrimination among tumors of more than one focus has segregated the latter into two groups: multifocal gliomas and multicentric gliomas (MCGs). In this case series, outcomes among three patients are described and discussed in light of the findings present in the literature. Ideally, it is crucial to consider genetic testing for categorizing each tumor. This can help determine the original genetic mutations of MCGs and allow to establish necessary screening testing for early detection. We present the cases of three patients diagnosed with cranial gliomas. The first case showed two synchronous gliomas at different loci in the right hemisphere. The second patient showed synchronous lesions on cranial magnetic resonance imaging in each hemisphere. The third case was of a patient with metachronous lesions appearing at different times with similar radiological findings at different loci of the same hemisphere. Discrimination among multifocal and multicentric gliomas requires genetic workup because radiological and temporal findings may fail to allow adequate discrimination.