The efficacy and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines around the world: a mini-review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

This meta-analysis evaluated the Efficacy and Effectiveness of several COVID-19 vaccines, including AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Moderna, Bharat, and Johnson & Johnson, to better estimate their immunogenicity, benefits, or side effects.

METHODS

Studies reporting the Efficacy and Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines from November 2020 to April 2022 were included. The pooled Effectiveness/Efficacy with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI) with Metaprop order was calculated. The results were presented in forest plots. Predefined subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses were also performed.

RESULTS

A total of twenty articles were included in this meta-analysis. After the first dose of the vaccine, the total effectiveness of all COVID-19 vaccines in our study was 71% (95% CI 0.65, 0.78). The total effectiveness of vaccines after the second dose was 91% (95% CI 0.88, 0.94)). The total efficacy of vaccines after the first and second doses was 81% (95% CI 0.70, 0.91) and 71% (95% CI 0.62, 0.79), respectively. The effectiveness of the Moderna vaccine after the first and second dose was the highest among other studied vaccines ((74% (95% CI, 0.65, 0.83) and 93% (95% CI, 0.89, 0.97), respectively). The highest first dose overall effectiveness of the studied vaccines was against the Gamma variant (74% (95% CI, 0.73, 0.75)), and the highest effectiveness after the second dose was observed against the Beta variant (96% (95% CI, 0.96, 0.96)). The Efficacy for AstraZeneca and Pfizer vaccines after the first dose was 78% (95% CI, 0.62, 0.95) and 84% (95% CI, 0.77, 0.92), respectively. The second dose Efficacy for AstraZeneca, Pfizer, and Bharat was 67% (95% CI, 0.54, 0.80), 93% (95% CI, 0.85, 1.00), and 71% (95% CI, 0.61, 0.82), respectively. The overall efficacy of first and second dose vaccination against the Alfa variant was 84% (95% CI, 0.84, 0.84) and 77% (95% CI, 0.57, 0.97), respectively, the highest among other variants.

CONCLUSION

mRNA-based vaccines against COVID-19 showed the highest total efficacy and effectiveness than other vaccines. In general, administering the second dose produced a more reliable response and higher effectiveness than a single dose.

Oropharyngeal candidiasis in head and neck cancer patients in Iran: Species identification, antifungal susceptibility and pathogenic characterization

OBJECTIVE

Oropharyngeal candidiasis (OPC) is the most frequent opportunistic fungal infection in head and neck cancer patients. This study was done to identify the Candida species, which cause OPC, and to evaluate their antifungal susceptibility pattern and pathogenic characteristics in Iranian head and neck cancer patients treated by radiotherapy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The oral clinical samples were determined by culturing on CHROMagar, carbohydrate assimilation and ITS sequencing methods. Biofilm formation, phospholipase and proteinase activity and antifungal susceptibility were examined too.

RESULTS

Among 54 patients with confirmed OPC, 39 (72.22%) patients were male and 15 (27.77%) were female. The most frequently Candida species from a total of 60 isolates was C. albicans (53.3%), followed by C. tropicalis (21.66%), C. glabrata (15%), C. kefyr (5%) and C. dubliniensis (1.66%). All the isolates were high-producers of biofilm. All of Candida isolates were proteinase positive and 47 isolates (81.04%) represented phospholipase activity. The maximum and minimum rates of antifungal resistance belonged to ketoconazole (93.75% of C. albicans and 89.28% of Candida non-albicans) and fluconazole (62.50% and 42.85% of C. albicans and Candida non-albicans), respectively. The most effective antifungal against all candida isolates was fluconazole.

CONCLUSION

Our data can estimate abundance of OPC in male and female head and neck cancer patients and is helpful to use effective strategies for antifungal treatment, prophylaxis, and preventive therapies in these patients.