1
|
Mancin S, Sguanci M, Andreoli D, Soekeland F, Anastasi G, Piredda M, De Marinis MG. Systematic review of clinical practice guidelines and systematic reviews: A method for conducting comprehensive analysis. MethodsX 2024; 12:102532. [PMID: 38226356 PMCID: PMC10788252 DOI: 10.1016/j.mex.2023.102532] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/17/2024] Open
Abstract
A systematic review (SR) is a research method for synthesizing evidence on a specific topic. Among the various types of systematic reviews, there are SRs of guidelines (CPGs) and SRs of SRs. Traditionally, they are limited to just one type of secondary evidence. This paper introduces an innovative SR methodology that combines CPGs and SRs to improve evidence synthesis and overcome the limitations of isolated use. Essential steps that should always precede the actual research process include registering the research protocol, formulating research questions and setting inclusion/exclusion criteria. Using the PRISMA protocol for comprehensive database searches, it's crucial to combine keywords with boolean operators and remove duplicates. The eligibility of studies should be assessed by selecting potentially relevant articles through an initial screening of titles and abstracts, followed by a meticulous analysis of the full-texts. Rigorous evidence evaluation tools, such as AGREE II for CPGs and AMSTAR 2 for SRs, and the double reviewer approach ensure high-quality selections. Additionally, converting summarized results into percentages and applying statistical analyses facilitate interpretation and improve the reliability of rater assessments. A further characteristic of this methodology is its adaptability to the evolution of healthcare research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Mancin
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Sguanci
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Research Unit of Nursing Science, University Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
| | - Desirèe Andreoli
- Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria della Misericordia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Fanny Soekeland
- University of Applied Sciences, School of Health Professions, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Giuliano Anastasi
- Department of Trauma, AOU G. Martino University Hospital, Messina, Italy
| | - Michela Piredda
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Research Unit of Nursing Science, University Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Grazia De Marinis
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Research Unit of Nursing Science, University Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pervez A, Bukhari MM, Chhapra R, Baig MI, Martins RS, Pirzada S, Rizvi NA, Aamdani SS, Ayub B, Rehman AA, Mustafa MA, Nadeem S, Asad N, Haider AH, Nadeem T. Adolopment of clinical practice guidelines and creation of referral pathways for psychiatric conditions in Pakistan. Lancet Reg Health Southeast Asia 2024; 23:100387. [PMID: 38486880 PMCID: PMC10938165 DOI: 10.1016/j.lansea.2024.100387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2023] [Revised: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 03/17/2024]
Abstract
Psychiatric disorders are highly prevalent in Pakistan and burdens the scarce number of psychiatrists present in the country. The establishment of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (EBCPGs) and primary-care referral pathways within the local context is imperative to make the process efficient. In this Health Policy, we aimed to develop EBCPGs and primary-care referral pathways that are specific to Pakistan's primary-care setting, with the aim of facilitating the management of psychiatric conditions. Ten EBCPGs were created through the GRADE-ADOLOPMENT process; two recommendations were adopted with minor changes, 43 were excluded, and all others were adopted without any changes. Ten primary-care referral pathways for managing ten psychiatric disorders were created and 23 recommendations were added which will help to bridge the gap in care provision. These psychiatric referral pathways and EBCPGs will bring Pakistan's healthcare system a step closer to achieving optimal health outcomes for patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alina Pervez
- Center for Clinical Best Practices, Clinical and Translational Research Incubator, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
| | | | | | | | - Russell Seth Martins
- Center for Clinical Best Practices, Clinical and Translational Research Incubator, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Sonia Pirzada
- Medical College, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Nashia Ali Rizvi
- Center for Clinical Best Practices, Clinical and Translational Research Incubator, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
| | | | - Bushra Ayub
- Learning Research Centre, Patel Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Alina Abdul Rehman
- Center for Clinical Best Practices, Clinical and Translational Research Incubator, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Mohsin Ali Mustafa
- Center for Clinical Best Practices, Clinical and Translational Research Incubator, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Sarah Nadeem
- Section of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Nargis Asad
- Department of Psychiatry, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
| | | | - Tania Nadeem
- Department of Psychiatry, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Brandt J, Bressi J, Lê ML, Neal D, Cadogan C, Witt-Doerring J, Witt-Doerring M, Wright S. Prescribing and deprescribing guidance for benzodiazepine and benzodiazepine receptor agonist use in adults with depression, anxiety, and insomnia: an international scoping review. EClinicalMedicine 2024; 70:102507. [PMID: 38516102 PMCID: PMC10955669 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2023] [Revised: 02/03/2024] [Accepted: 02/16/2024] [Indexed: 03/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Clinical practice guidelines and guidance documents routinely offer prescribing clinicians' recommendations and instruction on the use of psychotropic drugs for mental illness. We sought to characterise parameters relevant to prescribing and deprescribing of benzodiazepine (BZD) and benzodiazepine receptor agonist (BZRA), in clinical practice guidelines and guidance documents internationally, for adult patients with unipolar depression, anxiety disorders and insomnia to understand similarities and discrepancies between evidence-based expert opinion. Methods A Scoping Review was conducted to characterize documents that offered evidence-based and/or consensus pharmacologic guidance on the management of unipolar depression, anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorders, post-traumatic stress disorders and insomnia. A systematic search was conducted of PubMed, SCOPUS, PsycINFO and CINAHL from inception to October 13, 2023 and supplemented by a gray literature search. Documents were screened in Covidence for eligibility. Subsequent data-charting on eligible documents collected information on aspects of both prescribing and deprescribing. Findings 113 documents offering guidance on BZD/BZRA use were data-charted. Overall, documents gathered were from Asia (n = 11), Europe (n = 34), North America (n = 37), Oceania (n = 7), and South America (n = 4) with the remainder being "International" (n = 20) and not representative to any particular region or country. By condition the documents reviewed covered unipolar depressive disorders (n = 28), anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder (n = 42) and Insomnia (n = 25). Few documents (n = 18) were sufficiently specific and complete to consider as de-prescribing focused documents. Interpretation Documents were in concordance in terms of BZD and BZRA not being used routinely as first-line pharmacologic agents. When used, it is advisable to restrict their duration to "short-term" use with the most commonly recommended duration being less than four weeks. Documents were less consistent in terms of prescriptive recommendations for specific drug, dosing and administration pattern (i.e regular or 'as needed') selection for each condition. Deprescribing documents were unanimously in favor of gradual dose reduction and patient shared decision-making. However, approaches towards dose-tapering differed substantially. Finally, there were inconsistencies and/or insufficiency of detail, among deprescribing documents, in terms of switching to a long-acting BZD, use of adjunctive pharmacotherapies and micro-tapering. Funding The authors received no funding for this work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaden Brandt
- Alliance for Benzodiazepine Best Practices, Portland, OR, USA
- College of Pharmacy, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Jolene Bressi
- Alliance for Benzodiazepine Best Practices, Portland, OR, USA
- Wegman's School of Pharmacy, St. John Fisher University, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Mê-Linh Lê
- College of Pharmacy, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
- Neil John Maclean Health Sciences Library, University of Manitoba, MB, Canada
| | - Dejanee Neal
- Wegman's School of Pharmacy, St. John Fisher University, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Cathal Cadogan
- Alliance for Benzodiazepine Best Practices, Portland, OR, USA
- School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Josef Witt-Doerring
- Alliance for Benzodiazepine Best Practices, Portland, OR, USA
- Witt-Doerring Psychiatry, Heber City, UT, USA
| | - Marissa Witt-Doerring
- Alliance for Benzodiazepine Best Practices, Portland, OR, USA
- Witt-Doerring Psychiatry, Heber City, UT, USA
| | - Steven Wright
- Alliance for Benzodiazepine Best Practices, Portland, OR, USA
- Wright Medical Consulting, Ashland, OR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Blay JY, Casali P, Ray-Coquard I, Seckl MJ, Gietema J, de Herder WW, Caplin M, Klümpen HJ, Glehen O, Wyrwicz L, Peeters R, Licitra L, Girard N, Piperno-Neumann S, Kapiteijn E, Idbaih A, Franceschi E, Trama A, Frezza AM, Hohenberger P, Hindi N, Martin-Broto J, Schell J, Rogasik M, Lejeune S, Oliver K, de Lorenzo F, Weinman A. Management of patients with rare adult solid cancers: objectives and evaluation of European reference networks (ERN) EURACAN. Lancet Reg Health Eur 2024; 39:100861. [PMID: 38384730 PMCID: PMC10879812 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.100861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2023] [Revised: 01/16/2024] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 02/23/2024]
Abstract
About 500,000 patients with rare adult solid cancers (RASC) are diagnosed yearly in Europe. Delays and unequal quality of management impact negatively their survival. Since 2017, European reference networks (ERN) aim to improve the quality of care of patients with rare disease. The steering committee of EURACAN, including physicians, researchers and patients review here the previous actions, present objectives of the ERN EURACAN dedicated to RASC. EURACAN promoted management in reference centres, and equal implementation of excellence and innovation in Europe and developed 22 clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). Additionally, fourteen information brochures translated in 24 EU languages were developed in collaboration with patient advocacy groups (ePAGs) and seventeen training session were organized. Nevertheless, connections to national networks in the 26 participating countries (106 centres), simplification of cross-border healthcare, international multidisciplinary tumour boards, registries and monitoring of the quality of care are still required. In this Health Policy, evaluation criteria of the performances of the network and of health care providers are proposed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean-Yves Blay
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Leon Berard & Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon (CRCL) & Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - Paolo Casali
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori and University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Isabelle Ray-Coquard
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Leon Berard & Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon (CRCL) & Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - Michael J. Seckl
- Department of Medical Oncology, Imperial College Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Trust (ICHNT), London, United Kingdom
| | - Jourik Gietema
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
- University of Groningen Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Wouter W. de Herder
- Department of Internal Medicine, Sector of Endocrinology, Erasmus MC and Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Martyn Caplin
- Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Heinz-Josef Klümpen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Olivier Glehen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Equipe CICLY & Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - Lucjan Wyrwicz
- M Sklodowska Curie Memorial Cancer Centre, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Robin Peeters
- Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lisa Licitra
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori and University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicolas Girard
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | | | - Ellen Kapiteijn
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Ahmed Idbaih
- Sorbonne Université, Inserm, CNRS, UMR S 1127, Institut du Cerveau, ICM, AP-HP, Hôpitaux Universitaires La Pitié Salpêtrière - Charles Foix, Service de Neurologie 2-Mazarin, Paris, France
| | - Enrico Franceschi
- Azienda USL / IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Annalisa Trama
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori and University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Anna-Maria Frezza
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori and University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Peter Hohenberger
- Div. of Surgical Oncology and Thoracic Surgery, Mannheim University Medical Centre, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Nadia Hindi
- Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
- Spanish Group for Research on Sarcoma (GEIS), Spain
| | - Javier Martin-Broto
- Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
- Spanish Group for Research on Sarcoma (GEIS), Spain
| | | | | | - Stephane Lejeune
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Kathy Oliver
- The International Brain Tumour Alliance (IBTA), Tadworth, United Kingdom
| | | | - Ariane Weinman
- European Patient Organisation for Rare Diseases (EURORDIS-Rare Diseases Europe), Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bolger LA, O'Riordan N, Allen C. A rapid improvement event: progesterone prescribing in prevention of miscarriage. BMJ Open Qual 2024; 13:e002517. [PMID: 38531628 DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 03/02/2024] [Indexed: 03/28/2024] Open
Abstract
A rapid improvement event (RIE) is a standard operational excellence technique that uses team-based problem solving to improve processes. In this study, a RIE was undertaken to improve progesterone prescribing rates for those with a history of miscarriage experiencing vaginal bleeding in early pregnancy. This was on the basis of a recent change in guidelines regarding prescribing in these instances. NICE guidelines changed in November 2021 after Cochrane meta-analysis and the PRISM (Progesterone in Spontaneous Miscarriage) randomised control trial demonstrated a higher incidence of live births in those prescribed vaginal micronised progesterone for threatened miscarriage, when compared with those not prescribed it.A RIE involves a team approach and a standard sequence of events allowing analysis and improvement of a process. Analysis in the form of audit revealed a low progesterone prescribing rate for eligible patients in our unit. Dissection of this problem into its elements revealed a low level of staff knowledge regarding the change in guidelines and a lack of confidence in prescription of progesterone. A plan of actionable events to improve prescribing rates was devised. The updated guidance and local recommendations on appropriate micronised progesterone formulations were presented at hospital Grand Rounds with multidisciplinary attendance. Infographics were displayed in areas visible to stakeholders within the hospital and on the hospital's social media pages. The validity of these educational measures to improve the process was reaudited after 3 months.Progesterone prescribing improved by 48%. Those comfortable with prescribing as per the new guidelines improved from 43% to 78%. A RIE proved to be an effective and efficient approach to collaboration, decision-making and action.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy Anne Bolger
- Obstetrics & Gynaecology, National Maternity Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Nicola O'Riordan
- Obstetrics & Gynaecology, National Maternity Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Cathy Allen
- Obstetrics & Gynaecology, National Maternity Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ye Z, Lai H, Ning J, Liu J, Huang J, Yang S, Jin J, Liu Y, Liu J, Zhao H, Ge L. Traditional Chinese medicine for insomnia: Recommendation mapping of the global clinical guidelines. J Ethnopharmacol 2024; 322:117601. [PMID: 38122913 DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2023.117601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2023] [Revised: 11/07/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) represents a rich repository of empirically-developed traditional medicines. The findings call for more rigorous study into the efficacy, safety, and mechanisms of action of TCM remedies to strengthen the evidence base. AIM OF THE STUDY To systematically review the quality of insomnia clinical practice guidelines that involve TCM recommendations and to summarize the certainty of evidence supporting the recommendations, strength, and consistency of recommendations, providing valuable research references for the development of future insomnia guidelines. MATERIALS AND METHODS We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CNKI, Wanfang, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, Chinese Medical Association, Chinese Sleep Research Society, Medsci, Medlive, British National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE), and the International Guidelines Collaboration Network (GIN) for clinical practice guidelines on insomnia from inception to March 5, 2023. Four evaluators conducted independent assessments of the quality of the guidelines by employing the AGREE II tool. Subsequently, the guideline recommendations were consolidated and presented as evidence maps. RESULTS Thirteen clinical practice guidelines addressing insomnia, encompassing 211 recommendations (consisting of 127 evidence-based and 84 expert consensus recommendations), were deemed eligible for inclusion in our analysis. The evaluation results revealed an overall suboptimal quality, with the "scope and purpose" domain achieving the highest score (58.1%), while the "applicability" domain garnered the lowest score (13.0%). Specifically, it was observed that 74.8% (n = 95) of the evidence-based recommendations were supported by evidence of either very low or low certainty, in contrast to the expert consensus recommendations, which accounted for 61.9% (n = 52). We subsequently synthesized 44 recommendations into four evidence maps, focusing on proprietary Chinese medicines, Chinese medicine prescriptions, acupuncture, and massage, respectively. Notably, Chinese herbal remedies and acupuncture exhibited robust support, substantiated by high-certainty evidence, exemplified by interventions such as Xuefu Zhuyu decoction, spleen decoction, body acupuncture, and ear acupuncture, resulting in solid recommendations. Conversely, proprietary Chinese medicines needed more high-certainty evidence, predominantly yielding weak recommendations. As for other therapies, the level of certainty was predominantly categorized as low or very low. Recommendations about magnetic therapy, bathing, and fumigation relied primarily on expert consensus, needing more substantive clinical research evidence, consequently forming weak recommendations. Hot ironing and acupoint injection recommendations were weakly endorsed, primarily based on observational studies. Furthermore, interventions like qigong, gua sha, and moxibustion displayed a relatively limited number of clinical studies, necessitating further exploration to ascertain their efficacy. CONCLUSIONS Our analysis revealed a need for substantial improvement in the quality of all the included guidelines related to insomnia. Notably, recommendations for Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) treatments predominantly rely on low-certainty evidence. This study represents a pioneering effort in the utilization of recommendation mapping to both present and identify existing gaps in the evidence landscape within TCM therapies, thus setting the stage for future research initiatives. The evidence supporting TCM therapy recommendations must be fortified to achieve a more substantial level of recommendation and higher certainty. Consequently, there exists a critical and pressing demand for high-quality clinical investigations dedicated to TCM, with a specific focus on ascertaining its long-term efficacy, safety, and potential side effects in the context of insomnia treatment. These endeavors are poised to establish a robust scientific foundation to inform the development of TCM therapy recommendations within the insomnia guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ziying Ye
- Evidence-Based Social Science Research Center, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China; Department of Social Medicine and Health Management, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Honghao Lai
- Evidence-Based Social Science Research Center, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China; Department of Social Medicine and Health Management, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Jinling Ning
- Evidence-Based Social Science Research Center, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China; Department of Social Medicine and Health Management, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Jianing Liu
- School of Nursing, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, China
| | - Jiajie Huang
- School of Nursing, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, China
| | - Sihong Yang
- Institute of Basic Research of Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China; China Center for Evidence Based Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Jiayue Jin
- Guang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China; Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Yajie Liu
- Guang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Jie Liu
- Guang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Hui Zhao
- Institute of Basic Research of Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China; China Center for Evidence Based Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
| | - Long Ge
- Evidence-Based Social Science Research Center, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China; Department of Social Medicine and Health Management, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China; Key Laboratory of Evidence Based Medicine and Knowledge Translation of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China; World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Guideline Implementation and Knowledge Translation, Lanzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Van Houtte J, Vandenbussche N, Derom E, Schoenen J, Versijpt J, Paemeleire K. Oxygen as an abortive therapy in cluster headache: a narrative review and clinical practice aspects. Acta Neurol Belg 2024:10.1007/s13760-024-02506-z. [PMID: 38498266 DOI: 10.1007/s13760-024-02506-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 03/20/2024]
Abstract
Cluster headache (International Classification of Headache Disorders third edition, ICHD-3 3.1) is a primary headache disorder affecting around 0.12% of individuals. It is characterized by severe headache attacks causing significant negative impact on the lives of patients. While administration of 100% oxygen is considered to be the first-choice acute treatment, undertreatment also exists. Reasons for undertreatment may entail problems with the correct prescription of oxygen, reimbursement issues or the practical implementation of home oxygen therapy. The aim of this manuscript is to review the scientific evidence on oxygen therapy for cluster headache and provide a practical guidance for both physicians and patients to optimize its use in an acute setting. The current evidence of the administration of 100% oxygen as a safe and effective treatment for cluster headache is strong. Based on several clinical trials and surveys, the recommended flow rates range between 12 and 15 L/min via a non-rebreathing mask, for at least fifteen minutes. The frequency of cluster headache attacks and thus the need for acute treatment can be very high. Fortunately, the Belgian social security system provides a full and lifetime reimbursement of oxygen therapy for cluster headache if the diagnosis and the need for this therapy has been certified by a neurologist, neurosurgeon or neuropsychiatrist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Van Houtte
- Department of Neurology, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
| | - Nicolas Vandenbussche
- Department of Neurology, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Eric Derom
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Jean Schoenen
- Headache Research Unit, Department of Neurology, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Jan Versijpt
- Department of Neurology, Brussels University Hospital, Jette, Belgium
| | - Koen Paemeleire
- Department of Neurology, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Roth GS, Verlingue L, Sarabi M, Blanc JF, Boleslawski E, Boudjema K, Bretagne-Bignon AL, Camus-Duboc M, Coriat R, Créhange G, De Baere T, de la Fouchardière C, Dromain C, Edeline J, Gelli M, Guiu B, Horn S, Laurent-Croise V, Lepage C, Lièvre A, Lopez A, Manfredi S, Meilleroux J, Neuzillet C, Paradis V, Prat F, Ronot M, Rosmorduc O, Cunha AS, Soubrane O, Turpin A, Louvet C, Bouché O, Malka D. Biliary tract cancers: French national clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatments and follow-up (TNCD, SNFGE, FFCD, UNICANCER, GERCOR, SFCD, SFED, AFEF, SFRO, SFP, SFR, ACABi, ACHBPT). Eur J Cancer 2024; 202:114000. [PMID: 38493667 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2024.114000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2023] [Revised: 02/28/2024] [Accepted: 03/01/2024] [Indexed: 03/19/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This document is a summary of the French intergroup guidelines of the management of biliary tract cancers (BTC) (intrahepatic, perihilar and distal cholangiocarcinomas, and gallbladder carcinomas) published in September 2023, available on the website of the French Society of Gastroenterology (SNFGE) (www.tncd.org). METHODS This collaborative work was conducted under the auspices of French medical and surgical societies involved in the management of BTC. Recommendations were graded in three categories (A, B and C) according to the level of scientific evidence until August 2023. RESULTS BTC diagnosis and staging is mainly based on enhanced computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and (endoscopic) ultrasound-guided biopsy. Treatment strategy depends on BTC subtype and disease stage. Surgery followed by adjuvant capecitabine is recommended for localised disease. No neoadjuvant treatment is validated to date. Cisplatin-gemcitabine chemotherapy combined to the anti-PD-L1 inhibitor durvalumab is the first-line standard of care for advanced disease. Early systematic tumour molecular profiling is recommended to screen for actionable alterations (IDH1 mutations, FGFR2 rearrangements, HER2 amplification, BRAFV600E mutation, MSI/dMMR status, etc.) and guide subsequent lines of treatment. In the absence of actionable alterations, FOLFOX chemotherapy is the only second-line standard-of-care. No third-line chemotherapy standard is validated to date. CONCLUSION These guidelines are intended to provide a personalised therapeutic strategy for daily clinical practice. Each individual BTC case should be discussed by a multidisciplinary team.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gael S Roth
- Univ. Grenoble Alpes / Hepato-Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology department, CHU Grenoble Alpes / Institute for Advanced Biosciences, CNRS UMR 5309-INSERM U1209, Grenoble, France
| | - Loic Verlingue
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Léon Bérard, 28 rue Laennec, Lyon, France
| | - Matthieu Sarabi
- Gastroenterology Department, Hopital privé Jean Mermoz, 69008 Lyon, France
| | | | - Emmanuel Boleslawski
- Univ. Lille, INSERM U1189, CHU Lille, Service de Chirurgie Digestive et Transplantations, Lille, France
| | - Karim Boudjema
- Département de chirurgie viscérale hépatobiliaire, CHU de Rennes, Rennes, France
| | | | - Marine Camus-Duboc
- Endoscopie digestive, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, AP-HP/Sorbonne Université, Paris France
| | - Romain Coriat
- Service de gastroentérologie, d'endoscopie et d'oncologie digestive, Hôpital Cochin, APHP, Paris, France
| | - Gilles Créhange
- Radiation Oncology Department. Paris/Saint-Cloud/Orsay, Institut Curie. PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - Thierry De Baere
- Département de Radiologie Interventionnelle, Gustave Roussy, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | | | - Clarisse Dromain
- Service de radiodiagnostic et radiologie interventionnelle, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Switzerland
| | | | - Maximiliano Gelli
- Département de Chirurgie Viscérale, Gustave Roussy, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Boris Guiu
- Department of Radiology, St-Eloi University Hospital - Montpellier School of Medicine, Montpellier, France
| | - Samy Horn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Pierre Benite, France
| | - Valérie Laurent-Croise
- Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nancy, Hôpital de Brabois, 54500 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Côme Lepage
- Université de Bourgogne, CHU Dijon-Bourgogne, INSERM U1231. BP 87 900, 14 rue Paul Gaffarel, 21079 Dijon, France
| | - Astrid Lièvre
- Department of Gastroenterology, Rennes University Hospital, University of Rennes 1, INSERM Unité 1242, Rennes, France
| | - Anthony Lopez
- INSERM U1256, NGERE, Faculty of Medicine, University of Lorraine, 54500 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France; Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Nancy University Hospital, University of Lorraine, 54500 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France, NGERE, Faculty of Medicine, University of Lorraine, 54500 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Sylvain Manfredi
- Université de Bourgogne, CHU Dijon-Bourgogne, INSERM U1231. BP 87 900, 14 rue Paul Gaffarel, 21079 Dijon, France
| | - Julie Meilleroux
- Pathology and Cytology Department, CHU Toulouse, IUCT Oncopole, Toulouse Cedex 9, France
| | - Cindy Neuzillet
- GI Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie - Site Saint Cloud, Versailles Saint-Quentin University, Paris Saclay University, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Valérie Paradis
- Université Paris Cité, APHP.Nord Sce d'Anatomie Pathologique Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, INSERM UMR 1149, France
| | - Frédéric Prat
- Endoscopie digestive, Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France
| | - Maxime Ronot
- Department of Medical Imaging, Beaujon University Hospital, Clichy, France
| | - Olivier Rosmorduc
- AP-HP Hôpital Paul-Brousse, Centre Hépato-Biliaire, INSERM U1193, Université Paris-Saclay, FHU Hépatinov, France
| | - Antonio Sa Cunha
- AP-HP Hôpital Paul-Brousse, Centre Hépato-Biliaire, INSERM U1193, Université Paris-Saclay, FHU Hépatinov, France
| | - Olivier Soubrane
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - Anthony Turpin
- Department of Medical Oncology, CNRS UMR9020, Inserm UMR-S 1277-Canther-Cancer Heterogeneity, Plasticity and Resistance to Therapies, University Lille, CHU Lille, Lille; GERCOR, Paris, France
| | - Christophe Louvet
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institute Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - Olivier Bouché
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology Department, Robert-Debré University Hospital, Reims, France
| | - David Malka
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institute Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Aldahmashi H, Maneze D, Molloy L, Salamonson Y. Nurses' adoption of diabetes clinical practice guidelines in primary care and the impacts on patient outcomes and safety: An integrative review. Int J Nurs Stud 2024; 154:104747. [PMID: 38531197 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104747] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2023] [Revised: 02/26/2024] [Accepted: 02/29/2024] [Indexed: 03/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Complications related to diabetes mellitus impose substantial health and economic burdens to individuals and society. While clinical practice guidelines improve diabetes management in primary care settings, the variability in adherence to these guidelines persist. Hence, there is a need to comprehensively review existing evidence regarding factors influencing nurses' adherence to implementation of clinical practice guidelines to improve clinical care and patient safety. OBJECTIVE This integrative review seeks to investigate nurses' adherence to clinical guidelines for diabetes management in primary healthcare settings and to explore factors influencing effective implementation, focusing on the role of nurses and impacts on patient outcomes. METHODS A comprehensive search was conducted in March 2023 across six electronic databases. The search targeted studies that examined the use of Type 2 diabetes mellitus guidelines by nurses in primary healthcare settings with a focus on clinical management outcomes related to diabetes care or patient safety. Included studies were classified using the Effective Practice and Organisation of Care taxonomy, synthesised narratively and presented thematically. Reporting of the review adhered to PRISMA guidelines. (PROSPERO ID CRD42023394311). RESULTS The review included ten studies conducted between 2000 and 2020, and the results were categorised into three themes. These were: (i) Implementation strategies to promote clinical practice guidelines adherence, including health professional development, reminders for clinicians, patient-mediated interventions, health information systems, role expansion, and comprehensive package-of-care. A multifaceted educational approach emerged as the most effective strategy. (ii) Impact of guidelines adherence: These strategies consistently improved clinical management, lowering HbA1c levels, improving blood pressure and lipid profiles, and enhancing patient self-care engagement, along with increased nurses' adherence to diabetes clinical guidelines. (iii) The role of nurses in guideline implementation, enabling independent practice within multidisciplinary teams. Their roles encompassed patient education, collaborative practice with fellow healthcare professionals, program planning and execution, and comprehensive documentation review. Nurse-led interventions were effective in improving patient outcomes, underscoring the necessity of empowering nurses with greater autonomy in providing primary diabetes care. CONCLUSION Implementing a diverse range of strategies, focusing on comprehensive education for healthcare providers, is paramount for enhancing guideline adherence in diabetes care, to improve clinical management towards optimal patient health outcomes. Tailoring these strategies to meet local needs adds relevance to the guidelines. Empowering nurses to take a leading role in primary care not only enhances patient safety but also promotes quality of care, resulting in improved overall outcomes. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT In primary care, empowering nurses with diabetes guideline education and tailoring strategies to local needs enhance guideline adherence and improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hadwan Aldahmashi
- School of Nursing, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Sydney, Australia; College of Applied Medical Sciences, University of Hafr Albatin, Saudi Arabia.
| | - Della Maneze
- School of Nursing, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Sydney, Australia; School of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Australia; Australian Centre for Integration of Oral Health, Australia.
| | - Luke Molloy
- School of Nursing, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Yenna Salamonson
- School of Nursing, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Sydney, Australia; Australian Centre for Integration of Oral Health, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Yackel HD, Halpenny B, Abrahm JL, Ligibel J, Enzinger A, Lobach DF, Cooley ME. A qualitative analysis of algorithm-based decision support usability testing for symptom management across the trajectory of cancer care: one size does not fit all. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2024; 24:63. [PMID: 38443870 PMCID: PMC10913367 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-024-02466-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2023] [Accepted: 02/22/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adults with cancer experience symptoms that change across the disease trajectory. Due to the distress and cost associated with uncontrolled symptoms, improving symptom management is an important component of quality cancer care. Clinical decision support (CDS) is a promising strategy to integrate clinical practice guideline (CPG)-based symptom management recommendations at the point of care. METHODS The objectives of this project were to develop and evaluate the usability of two symptom management algorithms (constipation and fatigue) across the trajectory of cancer care in patients with active disease treated in comprehensive or community cancer care settings to surveillance of cancer survivors in primary care practices. A modified ADAPTE process was used to develop algorithms based on national CPGs. Usability testing involved semi-structured interviews with clinicians from varied care settings, including comprehensive and community cancer centers, and primary care. The transcripts were analyzed with MAXQDA using Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis method. A cross tabs analysis was also performed to assess the prevalence of themes and subthemes by cancer care setting. RESULTS A total of 17 clinicians (physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants) were interviewed for usability testing. Three main themes emerged: (1) Algorithms as useful, (2) Symptom management differences, and (3) Different target end-users. The cross-tabs analysis demonstrated differences among care trajectories and settings that originated in the Symptom management differences theme. The sub-themes of "Differences between diseases" and "Differences between care trajectories" originated from participants working in a comprehensive cancer center, which tends to be disease-specific locations for patients on active treatment. Meanwhile, participants from primary care identified the sub-theme of "Differences in settings," indicating that symptom management strategies are care setting specific. CONCLUSIONS While CDS can help promote evidence-based symptom management, systems providing care recommendations need to be specifically developed to fit patient characteristics and clinical context. Findings suggest that one set of algorithms will not be applicable throughout the entire cancer trajectory. Unique CDS for symptom management will be needed for patients who are cancer survivors being followed in primary care settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Barbara Halpenny
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, LW-508, 02215, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Janet L Abrahm
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, LW-508, 02215, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jennifer Ligibel
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, LW-508, 02215, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andrea Enzinger
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, LW-508, 02215, Boston, MA, USA
| | - David F Lobach
- Elimu Informatics, 1709 Julian Court, 94530, El Cerrito, CA, USA
| | - Mary E Cooley
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, LW-508, 02215, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Howard C, Sell T, Abraham C, Anderson JM, Norris B, Anderson RM, Vu TK, Vassar M, Checketts JX. Inadequate harms reporting among randomized controlled trials cited as supporting evidence in the AAOS management of hip fractures in older adults clinical practice guideline recommendations. Injury 2024; 55:111326. [PMID: 38262332 DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2024.111326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2022] [Revised: 11/11/2023] [Accepted: 01/12/2024] [Indexed: 01/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recommendations within clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are heavily influenced by results from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Therefore, it is imperative that all RCT outcomes are reported thoroughly to ensure CPGs are created using accurate information. Here, we evaluate the quality of harms reporting using the CONSORT Extension for Harms in RCTs underpinning recommendations in the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons (AAOS) Management of Hip Fractures in Older Adults CPG. METHODS Each RCT cited as evidence for recommendations in the AAOS Management of Hip Fractures in Older Adults CPG was evaluated using the CONSORT Extension for Harms to determine the quality of harms reporting. Descriptive statistics (frequencies, percentages, 95 % confidence intervals) were used to summarize adherence to CONSORT Harms items. A linear regression model was used to evaluate the CONSORT Harms influence on the quality of reporting over time. RESULTS Among the 156 RCTs identified, there were a total of 31,848 participants. Most RCTs were conducted at a single center (137; 87.8 %) and in a single-blind manner (130; 83.3 %). Fifty-four (34.6 %) RCTs did not provide funding statements. Trials adequately reported an average of 6.65 out of 18 CONSORT Extension for Harms items (37.0 %). One RCT adequately reported all items, while five reported zero items. Forty-seven RCTs (30.1 %) reported ≥ 50 % of items and 73 (46.8 %) reported ≤ 33.3 % of items. The linear regression model demonstrated no significant increase in mean adherence over time (adjusted R2 = -0.006; p = 0.563). CONCLUSION Our results highlight inadequate harms reporting among RCTs in the AAOS Management of Hip Fractures in Older Patients CPG. While the CONSORT Harms Extension was intended to enhance reporting, the linear regression model did not demonstrate significant improvements over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Conner Howard
- Oklahoma State University, Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OK, USA.
| | - Tianna Sell
- Burrell College of Osteopathic Medicine, Las Cruces, NM, USA
| | - Christena Abraham
- Kansas City University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Kansas City, MO, USA
| | - J Michael Anderson
- Oklahoma State University Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tulsa, OK, USA
| | - Brent Norris
- Oklahoma State University Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tulsa, OK, USA; Orthopaedic Trauma Services of Oklahoma, Tulsa, OK, USA
| | - Reece M Anderson
- Oklahoma State University, Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OK, USA
| | - Thuc K Vu
- Kansas City University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Kansas City, MO, USA
| | - Matt Vassar
- Oklahoma State University, Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OK, USA
| | - Jake X Checketts
- Oklahoma State University Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tulsa, OK, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kubota K, Nakashima K, Nakashima K, Kataoka M, Inoue K, Goto M, Kanbayashi C, Hirokaga K, Yamaguchi K, Suzuki A. The Japanese breast cancer society clinical practice guidelines for breast cancer screening and diagnosis, 2022 edition. Breast Cancer 2024; 31:157-164. [PMID: 37973686 PMCID: PMC10901949 DOI: 10.1007/s12282-023-01521-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
This article provides updates to readers based on the newly published Japanese Breast Cancer Society Clinical Practice Guidelines for Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis, 2022 Edition. These guidelines incorporate the latest evaluation of evidence from studies of diagnostic accuracy. For each clinical question, outcomes for benefits and harms were established, and qualitative or quantitative systematic reviews were conducted. Recommendations were determined through voting by a multidisciplinary group, and guidelines were documented to facilitate shared decision-making among patients and medical professionals. The guidelines address screening, surveillance, and pre- and postoperative diagnosis of breast cancer. In an environment that demands an integrated approach, decisions are needed on how to utilize modalities, such as mammography, ultrasound, MRI, and PET/CT. Additionally, it is vital to understand the appropriate use of new technologies, such as tomosynthesis, elastography, and contrast-enhanced ultrasound, and to consider how best to adapt these methods for individual patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazunori Kubota
- Department of Radiology, Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center, 2-1-50 Minami-koshigaya, Koshigaya, Saitama, 343-8555, Japan.
- The Japanese Breast Cancer Society Clinical Practice Guidelines Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis Subcommittee, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Kazutaka Nakashima
- Department of General Surgery, Kawasaki Medical School General Medical Center, Okayama, Japan
| | - Kazuaki Nakashima
- The Japanese Breast Cancer Society Clinical Practice Guidelines Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis Subcommittee, Tokyo, Japan
- Division of Breast Imaging and Breast Interventional Radiology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Masako Kataoka
- The Japanese Breast Cancer Society Clinical Practice Guidelines Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis Subcommittee, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Kenich Inoue
- The Japanese Breast Cancer Society Clinical Practice Guidelines Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis Subcommittee, Tokyo, Japan
- Breast Cancer Center, Shonan Memorial Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Mariko Goto
- The Japanese Breast Cancer Society Clinical Practice Guidelines Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis Subcommittee, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Chizuko Kanbayashi
- The Japanese Breast Cancer Society Clinical Practice Guidelines Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis Subcommittee, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Breast Oncology, Niigata Cancer Center Hospital, Niigata, Japan
| | - Koichi Hirokaga
- Department of Breast Surgery, Hyogo Cancer Center, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Ken Yamaguchi
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Saga, Japan
| | - Akihiko Suzuki
- Division of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Sendai, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Strauss T, Günther C, Brück N. [Juvenile localized scleroderma]. Dermatologie (Heidelb) 2024; 75:208-213. [PMID: 38240812 DOI: 10.1007/s00105-023-05293-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/22/2023] [Indexed: 02/24/2024]
Abstract
Juvenile scleroderma, often referred to as juvenile localized scleroderma or "morphea", is a rare inflammatory disease of the skin and skin-related structures, accompanied by local sclerosis and tissue fibrosis. Depending on the clinical manifestation, four different subtypes can be defined: limited, generalized, linear, and mixed. To prevent possible sequelae of the disease, the diagnosis should be made as early as possible and therapy should be initiated at specialized centers in multiprofessional pediatric and dermatologic collaboration. In this review, we present the main clinical, laboratory, and therapeutic characteristics of juvenile localized scleroderma and summarize recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timmy Strauss
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin, Medizinische Fakultät und Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland.
| | - Claudia Günther
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Dermatologie, Medizinische Fakultät und Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Deutschland
| | - Normi Brück
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin, Medizinische Fakultät und Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Rhodes S, Dodd S, Deckert S, Vasanthan L, Qiu R, Rohde JF, Florez ID, Schmitt J, Nieuwlaat R, Kirkham J, Williamson PR. Representation of published core outcome sets in practice guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol 2024; 169:111311. [PMID: 38423401 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2023] [Revised: 12/14/2023] [Accepted: 02/22/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES A core outcome set (COS) is an agreed standardized set of outcomes that should be measured and reported, as a minimum, in specific areas of health or health care. A COS is developed through a consensus process to ensure health care outcomes to be measured are relevant to decision-makers, including patients and health-care professionals. Use of COS in guideline development is likely to increase the relevance of the guideline to those decision-makers. Previous work has looked at the uptake of COS in trials, systematic reviews, health technology assessments and regulatory guidance but to date there has been no evaluation of the use of COS in practice guideline development. The objective of this study was to investigate the representation of core outcomes in a set of international practice guidelines. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING We searched for clinical guidelines relevant to ten high-quality COS (with focus on the United Kingdom, Germany, China, India, Canada, Denmark, United States and World Health Organisation). We matched scope between COS and guideline in terms of condition, population and outcome. We calculated the proportion of guidelines mentioning or referencing COS and the proportion of COS domains specifically, or generally, matching to outcomes specified in each guideline populations, interventions, comparators and outcome (PICO) statement. RESULTS We found 38 guidelines that contained 170 PICO statements matching the scope of the ten COS and of sufficient quality to allow data extraction. None of the guidelines reviewed explicitly mentioned or referenced the relevant COS. The median (range) of the proportion of core outcomes covered either specifically or generally by the guideline PICO was 30% (0%-100%). CONCLUSION There is no evidence that COS are being used routinely to inform the guideline development process, and concordance between outcomes in published guidelines and those in COS is limited. Further work is warranted to explore barriers and facilitators in the use of COS when developing clinical guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Rhodes
- Centre for Biostatistics, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.
| | - Susanna Dodd
- MRC-NIHR Trials Methodology Research Partnership, Department of Health Data Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L63 3GL, UK
| | - Stefanie Deckert
- Center for Evidence-Based Healthcare, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Lenny Vasanthan
- Physiotherapy Unit, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India; Department of Physiotherapy, Melbourne School of Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ruijin Qiu
- Key Laboratory of Chinese Internal Medicine of Ministry of Education and Beijing, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Affiliated Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Jeanett Friis Rohde
- The Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, 2000, Frederiksberg, Denmark; The Danish Health Authority, Department of Evidence-Based Medicine, Islands Brygge 67, 2300, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ivan D Florez
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Antioquia, Medellin, Colombia; School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Clínica Las Américas-AUNA, Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia
| | - Jochen Schmitt
- Center for Evidence-Based Healthcare, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Robby Nieuwlaat
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence & Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jamie Kirkham
- Centre for Biostatistics, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Paula R Williamson
- MRC-NIHR Trials Methodology Research Partnership, Department of Health Data Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L63 3GL, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Yu W, Chen D, Ding X, Qiao L, Zhang L, Gao X, Yan Y, Mo W, Ma J, Yin M. A critical appraisal of clinical practice guidelines on surgical treatments for spinal metastasis. Eur Spine J 2024:10.1007/s00586-023-08127-z. [PMID: 38407614 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-023-08127-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2023] [Revised: 12/26/2023] [Accepted: 12/29/2023] [Indexed: 02/27/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE As an important treatment for spinal metastasis, surgery has strict applicable conditions. Although various organizations have formulated different guidelines on surgical treatment for spinal metastasis (SM), there are certain differences in the content, standardization and quality of the guidelines and it is necessary to make a critical appraisal of them. We aim to systematically review and appraise the current guidelines on surgical treatments of SM and summarize the related recommendations with the quality evaluation of supporting evidence, as to provide a reference for the standardization of surgical treatment plans, and help clinical front-line medical workers can make safe and effective clinical decisions faster. METHODS We searched Pubmed, Web of Science, and Embase for three major databases and online guideline databases. According to certain inclusion and exclusion criteria, the latest guidelines on the surgical treatment of SM were sorted out. AGREE II was used to evaluated the guideline's quality, and we extracted and compared the recommended treatment content of each guideline with evaluating by the evidence-grading scale. RESULTS Eight guidelines from 2013 to 2019 were included. Seven guidelines are comprehensive guidelines and one related to the reconstructive surgery of SM. Five guidelines were evaluated as "recommended," and three guidelines were evaluated as "recommended with modifications." Regarding the indications of surgery with SM, four guidelines, seven guidelines, seven guidelines, three guidelines and three guidelines recommended surgical treatment for patients with SM with intractable pain, mechanical instability, metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC), recurrent spinal metastasis (RSM), and survival predication, respectively. Regarding the surgical strategies, three guidelines recommended minimally invasive therapy but had strict indications. Six guidelines and five guidelines recommend palliative surgery and with receiving radiation therapy, respectively. For the aggressive surgery, only one guideline recommended to apply to patients in good general conditions who has isolated symptomatic SM. Regarding the surgical reconstructions, one guideline didn't recommend iliac bone graft and three guidelines recommended PMMA bone cement. CONCLUSION Most of the guidelines do not provide clear criteria for surgical application and provide more of a basic framework. The level of evidence for these surgical recommendations ranges from LOE B to D, and almost all guidelines recommend vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty, but for palliative and more aggressive surgery, which recommended to personalize specific surgical strategies with multidisciplinary collaboration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenlong Yu
- Department of Orthopedic, Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Dingbang Chen
- Department of Orthopedic Oncology, Changzheng Hospital, Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200003, China
| | - Xing Ding
- Department of Orthopedic, Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Liang Qiao
- Department of Orthopedic, Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Luosheng Zhang
- Department of Orthopedic Oncology, Changzheng Hospital, Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200003, China
| | - Xin Gao
- Department of Orthopedic Oncology, Changzheng Hospital, Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200003, China
| | - Yinjie Yan
- Department of Orthopedic, Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Wen Mo
- Department of Orthopedic, Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 200032, China.
| | - Junming Ma
- Department of Orthopedic, Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 200032, China.
| | - Mengchen Yin
- Department of Orthopedic, Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 200032, China.
- Department of Orthopedic Oncology, Changzheng Hospital, Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200003, China.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Chang C, Sun J, Zhao X, Chen S, Song D, Wang L, Yang Y, Huang R, Zhang H, Du J. Clinical practice guidelines for the nutrition of colorectal cancer patients: a systematic review. Support Care Cancer 2024; 32:187. [PMID: 38396102 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-024-08394-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2023] [Accepted: 02/17/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study is to rigorously assess the methodological quality of published clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) related to nutrition among colorectal cancer patients, to compile consensus recommendations, and to evaluate the quality of the included CPGs. METHODS The systematic search covered eight electronic databases, two relevant professional association websites, and six guideline websites from their inception up to January 22, 2023. The methodological quality of the eligible guidelines was evaluated using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) instrument, and then, consensus recommendations were synthesized. The scores for each domain were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Using the mean score as the benchmark for comparison, they were subsequently ranked from highest to lowest. The included guidelines were then categorized as having "high," "moderate," or "low" quality based on their scores. RESULTS The literature search yielded ten guidelines. The findings indicated that the "Clarity of presentation" domain had the highest mean score (65.2 ± 7.7). This demonstrates how the guidelines effectively articulate recommendations. Additionally, the "Scope and purpose" domain achieved a mean score of 60.7 ± 10.9, followed by "Rigor of development" (51.7 ± 15.7), "Editorial independence" (51.1 ± 21), "Stakeholder involvement" (48 ± 16.8), and "Applicability" domains (47.5 ± 17.3). Two CPGs received an overall rating of "high quality" and were recommended; four CPGs received an overall rating of "moderate" and were recommended with modifications; and four CPGs received an overall rating of "low quality" and were not recommended. Furthermore, this study compiled twenty consensus recommendations related to nine distinct clinical issues. CONCLUSION This study identified disparities in the methodological quality of the included CPGs, particularly in the "Applicability" domain, thus emphasizing the need for advancement in clinical feasibility and implementation. Notably, there is few guidelines specifically targeting colorectal cancer nutrition. These synthesized findings provided an intuitive, convenient, and comprehensive reference for evaluating nutrition among colorectal cancer patients. When applying these results, users should make careful decisions based on their specific situations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheng Chang
- The First Hospital of Jilin University, No. 1 Xinmin Street, ChangchunJilin, 130021, China
| | - Jiao Sun
- School of Nursing, Jilin University, No.965 Xinjiang Street, ChangchunJilin, 130021, China
| | - Xiaosu Zhao
- The First Hospital of Jilin University, No. 1 Xinmin Street, ChangchunJilin, 130021, China.
| | - Si Chen
- The First Hospital of Jilin University, No. 1 Xinmin Street, ChangchunJilin, 130021, China
| | - Dongpo Song
- School of Nursing, Jilin University, No.965 Xinjiang Street, ChangchunJilin, 130021, China
| | - Lijie Wang
- The First Hospital of Jilin University, No. 1 Xinmin Street, ChangchunJilin, 130021, China
| | - Yang Yang
- The First Hospital of Jilin University, No. 1 Xinmin Street, ChangchunJilin, 130021, China
| | - Ruling Huang
- The First Hospital of Jilin University, No. 1 Xinmin Street, ChangchunJilin, 130021, China
| | - Haijia Zhang
- The First Hospital of Jilin University, No. 1 Xinmin Street, ChangchunJilin, 130021, China
| | - Jing Du
- The First Hospital of Jilin University, No. 1 Xinmin Street, ChangchunJilin, 130021, China
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Lynne-Joseph A. The reproduction of knowledge hierarchies in transgender medicine: Professional, lay, and global expertise in clinical practice guidelines. Soc Sci Med 2024:116712. [PMID: 38443306 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116712] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2023] [Revised: 02/09/2024] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024]
Abstract
The process for developing clinical practice guidelines in medicine has changed dramatically over time. Previously, small groups of clinicians crafted clinical practice guidelines based on their professional expertise, but guideline developers must increasingly consider patients' lay expertise, global expertise, and principles of evidence-based medicine. This article analyzes how the World Professional Association for Transgender Health grappled with diverse forms of expertise and evidence-based medicine in the process of creating its "Standards of Care for the Health of Transgender and Gender Diverse People, Version 8" (hereafter, SOC-8), a prominent set of clinical practice guidelines in transgender medicine. Analysis is based on 83 interviews with clinicians, patients, and activists in the U.S. and Thailand between 2019 and 2021, as well as observation of transgender health conferences and content analysis of written materials. I find that despite the ostensible goal of incorporating more diverse expertise in this version of the guidelines, the SOC-8 ultimately reproduced traditional knowledge hierarchies in science and medicine in which the lay expertise of transgender and gender non-conforming patients and expertise from the Global South remain marginalized. I attribute this re-marginalization to the regulatory objectivity enacted in the SOC-8 revision process, which re-legitimized professional expertise, established no formal infrastructure for ensuring the equal participation of Global South stakeholders, and permitted limited inclusion of lay expertise from transgender and gender non-conforming people with relatively high levels of privilege (according to race, education, and other social statuses). These findings have implications for future research on knowledge hierarchies in science and medicine and the creation of clinical practice guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alyssa Lynne-Joseph
- Wichita State University, Department of Sociology, 1845 Fairmount Street, Wichita, KS, 67260, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Goossen K, Bieler D, Weise A, Nothacker M, Flohé S, Pieper D. Application of the PANELVIEW instrument to evaluate the guideline development process of the German polytrauma guideline. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2024:10.1007/s00068-024-02470-6. [PMID: 38381190 DOI: 10.1007/s00068-024-02470-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2024] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 02/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND PANELVIEW is an instrument for evaluating the appropriateness of the process, methods, and outcome of guideline development and the satisfaction of the guideline group with these steps. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the guideline development process of the German guideline on the treatment of patients with severe/multiple injuries ('German polytrauma guideline') from the perspective of the guideline group, and to identify areas where this process may be improved in the future. METHODS We administered PANELVIEW to the participants of the 2022 update of the German polytrauma guideline. All guideline group members, including delegates of participating medical societies, steering group members, authors of guideline chapters, the chair, and methodological lead, were invited to participate. Responses were analysed using descriptive statistics. Comments received were categorised by domains/items of the tool. RESULTS After the first, second, and last consensus conference, the guideline group was invited via email to participate in a web-based survey. Response rates were 36% (n/N = 13/36), 40% (12/30), and 37% (20/54), respectively. The mean scores for items ranged between 5.1 and 6.9 on a scale from 1 (fully disagree) to 7 (fully agree). Items with mean scores below 6.0 were related to (1) administration, (2) consideration of patients' views, perspectives, values, and preferences, and (3) the discussion of research gaps and needs for future research. CONCLUSION The PANELVIEW tool showed that the guideline group was satisfied with most aspects of the guideline development process. Areas for improvement of the process were identified. Strategies to improve response rates should be explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Käthe Goossen
- Institute for Research in Operative Medicine (IFOM), Faculty of Health, School of Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Ostmerheimer Str. 200, 51109, Cologne, Germany.
| | - Dan Bieler
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Reconstructive Surgery, Hand Surgery, Plastic Surgery and Burn Medicine, German Armed Forces Central Hospital Koblenz, Koblenz, Germany
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Alina Weise
- Institute for Research in Operative Medicine (IFOM), Faculty of Health, School of Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Ostmerheimer Str. 200, 51109, Cologne, Germany
| | - Monika Nothacker
- Institute for Medical Knowledge Management, Association of the Scientific Medical Societies (AWMF), c/o Philipps Universität Marburg/AWMF Berlin, Marburg, Germany
| | - Sascha Flohé
- Department of Trauma Surgery, Orthopaedics and Hand Surgery, Städtisches Klinikum Solingen, Solingen, Germany
| | - Dawid Pieper
- Institute for Research in Operative Medicine (IFOM), Faculty of Health, School of Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Ostmerheimer Str. 200, 51109, Cologne, Germany
- Faculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg, Brandenburg Medical School (Theodor Fontane), Institute for Health Services and Health System Research, Rüdersdorf, Germany
- Center for Health Services Research, Brandenburg Medical School (Theodor Fontane), Rüdersdorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Mthethwa M, Mbeye NM, Effa E, Arikpo D, Blose N, Brand A, Chibuzor M, Chipojola R, Durao S, Esu E, Kallon II, Kunje G, Lakudzala S, Naude C, Leong TD, Lewin S, Mabetha D, McCaul M, Meremikwu M, Vandvik PO, Kredo T. Newborn and child health national and provincial clinical practice guidelines in South Africa, Nigeria and Malawi: a scoping review. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:221. [PMID: 38374031 PMCID: PMC10877834 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-10682-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2023] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 02/21/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low and middle-income countries remain disproportionately affected by high rates of child mortality. Clinical practice guidelines are essential clinical tools supporting implementation of effective, safe, and cost-effective healthcare. High-quality evidence-based guidelines play a key role in improving clinical management to impact child mortality. We aimed to identify and assess the quality of guidelines for newborn and child health published in South Africa, Nigeria and Malawi in the last 5 years (2017-2022). METHODS We searched relevant websites (June-July 2022), for publicly available national and subnational de novo or adapted guidelines, addressing newborn and child health in the three countries. Pairs of reviewers independently extracted information from eligible guidelines (scope, topic, target population and users, responsible developers, stakeholder consultation process, adaptation description, assessment of evidence certainty). We appraised guideline quality using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation (AGREE II) instrument. RESULTS We identified 40-guidelines from the three countries. Of these, 8/40 reported being adopted from a parent guideline. More guidelines (n = 19) provided guidance on communicable diseases than on non-communicable diseases (n = 8). Guidelines were most often developed by national health ministries (n = 30) and professional societies (n = 14). Eighteen guidelines reported on stakeholder consultation; with Nigeria (10/11) and Malawi (3/6) faring better than South Africa (5/23) in reporting this activity. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) approach was used in 1/7 guidelines that reported assessing certainty of evidence. Overall guidelines scored well on two AGREE II domains: scope and purpose median (IQR) score 68% (IQR 47-83), and clarity of presentation 81% (67-94). Domains critical for ensuring credible guidance scored below 20%: rigour of development 11% (4-32) and editorial independence 6% (0-27). CONCLUSION National ministries and professional societies drive guideline activities in Malawi, Nigeria and South Arica. However, the methods and reporting do not adhere to global standards. We found low AGREE II scores for rigour of guideline development and editorial independence and limited use of GRADE or adaptation methods. This undermines the credibility of available guidelines to support evidence-informed care. Our findings highlight the importance of ongoing efforts to strengthen partnerships, capacity, and support for guideline development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mashudu Mthethwa
- Health Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Nyanyiwe Masingi Mbeye
- Evidence Informed Decision-Making Centre, Department of Community and Environmental Health, School of Global and Public Health, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Emmanuel Effa
- Cochrane Nigeria, University of Calabar Teaching Hospital, Calabar, Nigeria
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Calabar, Calabar, Nigeria
| | - Dachi Arikpo
- Cochrane Nigeria, University of Calabar Teaching Hospital, Calabar, Nigeria
| | - Ntombifuthi Blose
- Health Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Amanda Brand
- Centre for Evidence-Based Health Care, Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Global Health, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Moriam Chibuzor
- Cochrane Nigeria, University of Calabar Teaching Hospital, Calabar, Nigeria
| | - Roselyn Chipojola
- Evidence Informed Decision-Making Centre, Department of Community and Environmental Health, School of Global and Public Health, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Solange Durao
- Health Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Ekpereonne Esu
- Cochrane Nigeria, University of Calabar Teaching Hospital, Calabar, Nigeria
| | - Idriss Ibrahim Kallon
- Centre for Evidence-Based Health Care, Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Global Health, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Gertrude Kunje
- Evidence Informed Decision-Making Centre, Department of Community and Environmental Health, School of Global and Public Health, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Suzgika Lakudzala
- Evidence Informed Decision-Making Centre, Department of Community and Environmental Health, School of Global and Public Health, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Celeste Naude
- Centre for Evidence-Based Health Care, Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Global Health, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Trudy D Leong
- Health Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Simon Lewin
- Health Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa
- Department of Health Sciences Ålesund, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
| | - Denny Mabetha
- Health Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Michael McCaul
- Centre for Evidence-Based Health Care, Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Global Health, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Martin Meremikwu
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Calabar, Calabar, Nigeria
| | - Per Olav Vandvik
- MAGIC Evidence Ecosystem Foundation, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Medicine, Lovisenberg Diaconal Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Tamara Kredo
- Health Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Mohan D, Angus DC, Chang CCH, Elmer J, Fischhoff B, Rak KJ, Barnes JL, Peitzman AB, White DB. Using a theory-based, customized video game as an educational tool to improve physicians' trauma triage decisions: study protocol for a randomized cluster trial. Trials 2024; 25:127. [PMID: 38365758 PMCID: PMC10870723 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-07961-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 02/18/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transfer of severely injured patients to trauma centers, either directly from the field or after evaluation at non-trauma centers, reduces preventable morbidity and mortality. Failure to transfer these patients appropriately (i.e., under-triage) remains common, and occurs in part because physicians at non-trauma centers make diagnostic errors when evaluating the severity of patients' injuries. We developed Night Shift, a theory-based adventure video game, to recalibrate physician heuristics (intuitive judgments) in trauma triage and established its efficacy in the laboratory. We plan a type 1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial to determine whether the game changes physician triage decisions in real-life and hypothesize that it will reduce the proportion of patients under-triaged. METHODS We will recruit 800 physicians who work in the emergency departments (EDs) of non-trauma centers in the US and will randomize them to the game (intervention) or to usual education and training (control). We will ask those in the intervention group to play Night Shift for 2 h within 2 weeks of enrollment and again for 20 min at quarterly intervals. Those in the control group will receive only usual education (i.e., nothing supplemental). We will then assess physicians' triage practices for older, severely injured adults in the 1-year following enrollment, using Medicare claims, and will compare under-triage (primary outcome), 30-day mortality and re-admissions, functional independence, and over-triage between the two groups. We will evaluate contextual factors influencing reach, adoption, implementation, and maintenance with interviews of a subset of trial participants (n = 20) and of other key decision makers (e.g., patients, first responders, administrators [n = 100]). DISCUSSION The results of the trial will inform future efforts to improve the implementation of clinical practice guidelines in trauma triage and will provide deeper understanding of effective strategies to reduce diagnostic errors during time-sensitive decision making. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT06063434 . Registered 26 September 2023.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deepika Mohan
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, F1265 PUH, 200 Lothrop St, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| | - Derek C Angus
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Chung-Chou H Chang
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Jonathan Elmer
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Department of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Baruch Fischhoff
- Department of Engineering and Environmental Policy, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Kim J Rak
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Jacqueline L Barnes
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Andrew B Peitzman
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, F1265 PUH, 200 Lothrop St, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
| | - Douglas B White
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Blair A, Tan A, Homer CSE, Vogel JP. How do postnatal care guidelines in Australia compare to international standards? A scoping review and comparative analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2024; 24:121. [PMID: 38336632 PMCID: PMC10854083 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-024-06295-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Accepted: 01/27/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is no single national guideline in Australia on the provision of postnatal care, which means there is potential for significant variation in the standard and quality of care. This review aimed to systematically identify, synthesise, and assess the quality of postnatal care guidelines produced for use in Australia. A second aim was to compare postnatal care recommendations in Australian guidelines to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence's (NICE) and the World Health Organization's (WHO) postnatal care recommendations, to identify gaps and areas of disagreement. We focussed on recommendations regarding postnatal assessment of the woman or newborn, infant feeding, discharge planning, or community-based care. METHODS A scoping review was undertaken informed by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews. A database search and a manual search of state and national government health departments, professional associations and research institute websites was performed to identify relevant guidelines and recommendations. Guideline quality was assessed using the AGREE II tool. Guideline recommendations from Australia were mapped to 67 NICE/WHO recommendations. Recommendations that partially agreed, were modified, or in disagreement underwent further analysis. RESULTS A total of 31 Australian postnatal guidelines were identified and overall, these were of moderate- to high-quality. Of the 67 NICE/WHO recommendations, most agreed with the recommendations contained in Australian guidelines. There were five NICE/WHO recommendations with which corresponding Australian recommendations disagreed. There were 12 NICE/WHO recommendations that were commonly modified within Australia's guidelines. There were three NICE/WHO recommendations that did not appear in any Australian guideline. CONCLUSIONS Recommendations from postnatal guidelines in Australia have a high level of agreement with corresponding NICE/WHO recommendations. The few disagreements and modifications found in guideline recommendations - both across Australia's guidelines and between Australia's and the NICE/WHO guidelines - are worrying and warrant further examination, as they may result in different standards of care across Australia. Identified gaps in guidance should be prioritised for inclusion in new or updated guidelines where appropriate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda Blair
- Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program, Burnet Institute, 85 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, 207 Bouverie Street, Carlton, VIC, 3053, Australia.
| | - Annie Tan
- Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program, Burnet Institute, 85 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia
| | - Caroline S E Homer
- Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program, Burnet Institute, 85 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, 207 Bouverie Street, Carlton, VIC, 3053, Australia
| | - Joshua P Vogel
- Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program, Burnet Institute, 85 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, 207 Bouverie Street, Carlton, VIC, 3053, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Richaud C, Jochum F, Journo G, Toussaint A, Laurent M, Fontier Z, Langer A, Malhaire C, Laas E, Féron JG, Lecuru F, Pouget N, Guinebretière JM, El Zein S, Brain E, Watson S, Piperno-Neumann S, Blay JY, Bonvalot S, Bozec L, Hamy AS. Impact of guideline adherence and expert center referral on the early management and outcomes of uterine sarcoma patients: A retrospective analysis from the French NETSARC network. Eur J Surg Oncol 2024; 50:107319. [PMID: 38159391 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.107319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2023] [Revised: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Uterine sarcomas are rare tumors with a poor prognosis. Their diagnosis is often incidental, following surgery. Our goal was to examine the early management strategies for uterine sarcomas, and to assess the impact of guideline adherence and expert center referral on both the management approaches and the clinical outcomes in patients with uterine sarcomas. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed medical records from patients with uterine sarcoma referred to the Institut Curie and registered in the database of the French NETSARC network. RESULTS In total, 100 patients, with a median age of 54 years, were included in the analyses. On MRI scans (n = 36), all patients had at least two signs suggestive of malignancy, and 77.8 % had four or more signs. No preoperative biopsy was performed in 65.6 % of cases. Only 14.1 % of patients underwent initial surgery at an expert center. Surgery performed outside the network was significantly associated with morcellation (32.9 % vs. 0 %; p = 0.036), fewer negative margins (R0 margins 52.4 % vs. 100 %; p = 0.006), and poor adherence to surgical guidelines (28.3 vs. 72.7 %; p = 0.013). Multivariate analysis showed that non-adherence to surgical recommendations was not significantly associated with relapse-free survival (HR = 0.54; 95 % CI [0.21-1.38]), but was an independent predictor of poor overall survival (HR = 0.12; 95 % CI [0.03-0.52]; p = 0.005). CONCLUSION Despite a high frequency of suspicious clinical and radiological signs, a large proportion of women undergoing sarcoma surgery are treated outside of expert networks. We provide guidelines, integrating the clinical context and radiological signs to encourage early referral to reference centers for sarcoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clarisse Richaud
- Department of Gynecology, Cochin Port-Royal Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Floriane Jochum
- Department of Gynecology, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France; Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, Translational Research Department, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | | | | | | | | | - Adriana Langer
- Department of Radiology, Institut Curie, Saint Cloud, France
| | | | - Enora Laas
- Department of Breast, Gynecological and Reconstructive Surgery, Institut Curie, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Jean-Guillaume Féron
- Department of Breast, Gynecological and Reconstructive Surgery, Institut Curie, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Fabrice Lecuru
- Department of Breast, Gynecological and Reconstructive Surgery, Institut Curie, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Nicolas Pouget
- Department of Breast, Gynecological and Reconstructive Surgery, Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France
| | | | - Sophie El Zein
- Department of Pathology, Institut Curie, Université PSL, Paris, France
| | - Etienne Brain
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Saint Cloud, France
| | - Sarah Watson
- Department of Medical Oncology, Universite Paris Cite, Paris, France
| | | | - Jean-Yves Blay
- Department of Medical Oncology, Center Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Sylvie Bonvalot
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Curie, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Laurence Bozec
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Saint Cloud, France
| | - Anne-Sophie Hamy
- Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, Translational Research Department, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Lowry V, Lavigne P, Zidarov D, Matifat E, Cormier AA, Desmeules F. A Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Management of Various Shoulder Disorders. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2024; 105:411-426. [PMID: 37832814 DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2023.09.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2023] [Revised: 07/20/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To perform a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) covering the management of common shoulder disorders. DATA SOURCES A systematic search of CPGs on specific shoulder disorders was conducted up to August 2022 in relevant databases. STUDY SELECTION Twenty-six CPGs on rotator cuff (RC) tendinopathy, RC tear, calcific tendinitis, adhesive capsulitis, glenohumeral (GH) instability, GH osteoarthritis, or acromioclavicular disorders published from January 2008 onward were screened and included. DATA EXTRACTION CPGs methodological quality was assessed with the AGREE II checklist. All recommendations from CPGs were extracted and categorized by shoulder disorder and care components (evaluation, diagnostic imaging, medical, rehabilitation, and surgical treatments). After semantic analysis of the terminology, recommendations for each shoulder disorders were classified by 2 reviewers into "recommended," "may be recommended," or "not recommended." Disagreements were resolved by discussion until reviewers reached consensus. DATA SYNTHESIS Only 12 CPGs (46%) were of high quality with major limitations related to the applicability and editorial independence of the guidelines. The initial evaluation of shoulder pain should include patient's history, subjective evaluation focused on red flags, and clinical examination. Magnetic resonance imaging is usually not recommended to manage early shoulder pain, and recommendations for X-rays are conflicting. Acetaminophen, oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and rehabilitation including exercises were recommended or may be recommended to treat all shoulder pain disorders. Guidelines on surgical management recommendations differed; for example, 6 CPGs reported that acromioplasty was recommended or may be recommended in chronic RC tendinopathy, whereas 4 CPGs did not recommend it. CONCLUSIONS Recommendations vary for diagnostic imaging, conservative vs surgical treatment to manage shoulder pain, although several care components are consensual. The development of evidence-based, rigorous CPGs with a valid methodology and transparent reporting is warranted to improve overall shoulder pain care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Véronique Lowry
- School of Rehabilitation, Medicine Faculty, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada; Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital Research Center, Montreal, Canada.
| | - Patrick Lavigne
- Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital Research Center, Montreal, Canada; Surgery Department, Medicine Faculty, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada
| | - Diana Zidarov
- School of Rehabilitation, Medicine Faculty, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada; Interdisciplinary Rehabilitation Montreal Research Center (CRIR), Montreal, Canada; Montreal University Institute for Physical Impairment Rehabilitation (IURDPM), Montreal, Canada
| | - Eveline Matifat
- Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital Research Center, Montreal, Canada
| | | | - François Desmeules
- School of Rehabilitation, Medicine Faculty, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada; Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital Research Center, Montreal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Li M, Ma X, Xu H, Han M, Gou L, Du H, Wei L, Zhang D. Assessment of the quality, diagnosis, and therapeutic recommendations of clinical practice guidelines on patients with Helicobacter pylori infection: A systematic review. Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024:S0210-5705(24)00024-4. [PMID: 38307489 DOI: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2024.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2023] [Revised: 01/14/2024] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 02/04/2024]
Abstract
We conducted this study to systematically review and assess the current clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) related to the diagnosis and treatment of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection. The aim was to evaluate the quality of these included CPGs and provide clinicians with a convenient and comprehensive reference for updating their own CPGs. We searched four databases to identify eligible CPGs focusing on H. pylori diagnosis and treatment recommendations. The results were presented using evidence mappings. Quality and clinical applicability were assessed comprehensively using AGREE-II and AGREE-REX. Statistical tests, specifically Bonferroni tests, were employed to compare the quality between evidence-based guidelines and consensus. A total of 30 eligible CPGs were included, comprising 17 consensuses and 13 guidelines. The quality showed no statistical significance between consensuses and guidelines, mainly within the moderate to low range. Notably, recommendations across CPGs exhibited inconsistency. Nevertheless, concerning diagnosis, the urea breath test emerged as the most frequently recommended method for testing H. pylori. Regarding treatment, bismuth quadruple therapy stood out as the predominantly recommended eradication strategy, with high-dose dual therapy being a newly recommended option. Our findings suggest the need for specific organizations to update their CPGs on H. pylori or refer to recently published CPGs. Specifically, CPGs for pediatric cases require improvement and updating, while a notable absence of CPGs for the elderly was observed. Furthermore, there is a pressing need to improve the overall quality of CPGs related to H. pylori. Regarding recommendations, additional evidence is essential to elucidate the relationship between H. pylori infection and other diseases and refine test indications. Clinicians are encouraged to consider bismuth quadruple or high-dose dual therapy, incorporating locally sensitive antibiotics, as empirical radical therapy. .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muyang Li
- The Second Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou City, Gansu Province, China
| | - Xueni Ma
- The Second Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou City, Gansu Province, China
| | - Huimei Xu
- The Second Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou City, Gansu Province, China
| | - Mengyu Han
- The Second Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou City, Gansu Province, China
| | - Lingzhu Gou
- The Second Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou City, Gansu Province, China
| | - Hongwei Du
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Second People's Hospital of Lanzhou, Lanzhou City, Gansu Province, China
| | - Lina Wei
- Department of Gastroenterology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou City, Gansu Province, China
| | - Dekui Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou City, Gansu Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Lin FF, Murphy N, Martinez A, Marshall AP. Facilitators and barriers to evidence-based practice in central venous access device insertion and management in an intensive care unit: A qualitative study. Intensive Crit Care Nurs 2024; 80:103553. [PMID: 37783178 DOI: 10.1016/j.iccn.2023.103553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Revised: 08/27/2023] [Accepted: 09/16/2023] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Research evidence and clinical practice guidelines exist on preventing central line-associated bloodstream infections. However, there is limited knowledge about the barriers and facilitators to evidence-based central venous access device care. AIM The aim of this study was to investigate the facilitators and barriers to evidence-based central venous access device care in the adult intensive care setting. METHOD This exploratory qualitative study involved focus groups and interviews with registered nurses and physicians involved in central venous access device insertion and management in a tertiary Australian intensive care unit. Purposive sampling was used to recruit staff (n = 26) with varying years of clinical experience and clinical positions. Six focus groups and three individual interviews were conducted. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using content analysis. RESULTS Three overarching categories emerged: work structures to support optimal performance; processes to optimise quality of care, and factors influencing staff members' behaviour. Perceived facilitators to optimal central venous access device care included explicit language use in procedure documents, work-system integrated strategies, research evidence dissemination, audit, and feedback. However, there was a lack of consistency in practices such as audit, feedback, and patient participation. CONCLUSION To bring about effective improvement in central venous access device care, future interventions should be tailored to address identified barriers, including integrating audit and feedback into clinicians' work processes. Additionally, future research is needed to explore the role of patients and their families in central venous access device care. IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE When developing practice policies or procedure manuals, it is important to use explicit language to ensure clear communication of evidence-based recommendations to clinicians. Strategies integrated into work processes can enhance adherence to evidence-based practice. Large departments with limited educators should explore innovative methods like online education to ensure optimal central venous access device care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frances Fengzhi Lin
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Caring Futures Institute, Flinders University, South Australia, Australia; School of Nursing and Midwifery, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Queensland, Australia; School of Health, University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland, Australia; Sunshine Coast Health Institute, Queensland, Australia.
| | - Niki Murphy
- Intensive Care Unit, Gold Coast University Hospital, Queensland Health, Queensland, Australia
| | - Angelly Martinez
- Intensive Care Unit, Gold Coast University Hospital, Queensland Health, Queensland, Australia
| | - Andrea P Marshall
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Queensland, Australia; Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Ammann AM, Pratt CG, Lewis JD, Ahmad SA, Shaughnessy E, Heelan AA. Breast infections: A review of current literature. Am J Surg 2024; 228:78-82. [PMID: 37949727 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.10.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
Breast infections are common, affect women of all ages, and are associated with significant morbidity. Despite overall prevalence, treatment varies significantly based on provider or institution and no central treatment guidelines exist to direct the management of breast infections. This article provides a summary of the current trends in management of breast infections. The etiology, epidemiology, risk factors, presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of mastitis and breast abscesses (and their relative subdivisions) are explored based on the current literature. Trends in microbiology are reviewed and an approach to antibiotic coverage is proposed. Overall, there is a lack of randomized-controlled trials focused on the treatment of breast infections. This has resulted in an absence of clinical practice guidelines for the management of breast abscesses and variable practice patterns. The development of best-care protocols or pathways could provide more uniformity in care of breast infections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allison M Ammann
- Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati, 231 Albert Sabin Way, Cincinnati, OH, 45267-0558, USA.
| | - Catherine G Pratt
- Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati, 231 Albert Sabin Way, Cincinnati, OH, 45267-0558, USA.
| | - Jaime D Lewis
- Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati, 231 Albert Sabin Way, Cincinnati, OH, 45267-0558, USA.
| | - Syed A Ahmad
- Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati, 231 Albert Sabin Way, Cincinnati, OH, 45267-0558, USA.
| | - Elizabeth Shaughnessy
- Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati, 231 Albert Sabin Way, Cincinnati, OH, 45267-0558, USA.
| | - Alicia A Heelan
- Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati, 231 Albert Sabin Way, Cincinnati, OH, 45267-0558, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Mas-Llado C, Rossello X, González-Del-Hoyo M, Pocock S, de Werf FV, Chin CT, Danchin N, Lee SWL, Medina J, Huo Y, Bueno H. Secondary Prevention Therapies in Real-World Patients with Myocardial Infarction: Eligibility Based on Randomized Trials Supporting European and American Guidelines. Am J Med 2024; 137:137-146.e10. [PMID: 37838236 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2023.09.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2023] [Revised: 09/28/2023] [Accepted: 09/29/2023] [Indexed: 10/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We aimed to evaluate the applicability of the eligibility criteria of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) cited in guideline recommendations in a real-world cohort of patients receiving secondary prevention after acute myocardial infarction from the EPICOR registries. METHODS Recommendations provided by American and European guidelines for acute myocardial infarction were classified into general (applying to all patients) and specific (applying to patients with left ventricular dysfunction or heart failure). Randomized controlled trials cited in these recommendations were selected, and their entry criteria were applied to our international cohort of 18,117 patients. RESULTS There were 91.5% patients eligible for beta blockers (84.6% for general, and 5.9% for specific recommendations), 97.7% eligible for renin-angiotensin system inhibitor (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers [ACEI/ARB]) recommendations (69.9% for general, 27.9% for specific) and 4.1% eligible for mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (only specific recommendations). The percentages of patients with eligibility criteria who were discharged with a prescription of the recommended therapies were 80%-85% for beta blockers, 70%-75% for ACEI/ARB, and 29% for mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. There were large regional variations in the percentage of eligible patients and in those receiving the medications (eg, 95% in Northern Europe and 57% in Southeast Asia for beta blockers). CONCLUSION Most real-world acute myocardial infarction patients are eligible for secondary prevention therapy in both general and specific guideline recommendations, and the percentage of those on beta blockers and ACEI/ARB at hospital discharge is high. There are large regional variations in the proportion of patients receiving recommended therapies. Local targeted interventions are needed for quality improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caterina Mas-Llado
- Cardiology Department, Hospital de Manacor, Spain; Health Research Institute of the Balearic Islands, Palma, Spain; Facultad de Medicina, Universitat de les Illes Balears, Palma, Spain
| | - Xavier Rossello
- Health Research Institute of the Balearic Islands, Palma, Spain; Facultad de Medicina, Universitat de les Illes Balears, Palma, Spain; Cardiology Department, Health Research Institute of the Balearic Islands, Hospital Universitari Son Espases, Palma, Spain; Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares, Madrid, Spain.
| | | | | | - Frans Van de Werf
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Nicolas Danchin
- Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou & René Descartes University, France
| | | | | | - Yong Huo
- Beijing University First Hospital, China
| | - Héctor Bueno
- Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares, Madrid, Spain; Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, and Instituto de Investigación i+12, Madrid, Spain; Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Cardiovasculares, Madrid, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Burton W, Salsbury SA, Goertz CM. Healthcare provider perspectives on integrating a comprehensive spine care model in an academic health system: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:125. [PMID: 38263013 PMCID: PMC10804504 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-10578-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 01/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Healthcare systems (HCS) are challenged in adopting and sustaining comprehensive approaches to spine care that require coordination and collaboration among multiple service units. The integration of clinicians who provide first line, evidence-based, non-pharmacological therapies further complicates adoption of these care pathways. This cross-sectional study explored clinician perceptions about the integration of guideline-concordant care and optimal spine care workforce requirements within an academic HCS. METHODS Spine care clinicians from Duke University Health System (DUHS) completed a 26-item online survey via Qualtrics on barriers and facilitators to delivering guideline concordant care for low back pain patients. Data analysis included descriptive statistics and qualitative content analysis. RESULTS A total of 27 clinicians (57% response) responded to one or more items on the questionnaire, with 23 completing the majority of questions. Respondents reported that guidelines were implementable within DUHS, but no spine care guideline was used consistently across provider types. Guideline access and integration with electronic records were barriers to use. Respondents (81%) agreed most patients would benefit from non-pharmacological therapies such as physical therapy or chiropractic before receiving specialty referrals. Providers perceived spine patients expected diagnostic imaging (81%) and medication (70%) over non-pharmacological therapies. Providers agreed that receiving imaging (63%) and opioids (59%) benchmarks could be helpful but might not change their ordering practice, even if nudged by best practice advisories. Participants felt that an optimal spine care workforce would require more chiropractors and primary care providers and fewer neurosurgeons and orthopedists. In qualitative responses, respondents emphasized the following barriers to guideline-concordant care implementation: patient expectations, provider confidence with referral pathways, timely access, and the appropriate role of spine surgery. CONCLUSIONS Spine care clinicians had positive support for current tenets of guideline-concordant spine care for low back pain patients. However, significant barriers to implementation were identified, including mixed opinions about integration of non-pharmacological therapies, referral pathways, and best practices for imaging and opioid use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wren Burton
- Division of Preventive Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Osher Center for Integrative Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Stacie A Salsbury
- Palmer Center for Chiropractic Research, Palmer College of Chiropractic, Davenport, IA, USA
| | - Christine M Goertz
- Implementation of Spine Health Innovations, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, 300 W. Morgan Street, Durham, NC, 27701, USA.
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Musculoskeletal Research, Duke University, 300 W. Morgan Street, Durham, NC, 27701, USA.
- Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, 300 W. Morgan Street, Durham, NC, 27701, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Klein Haneveld MJ, Hieltjes IJ, Langendam MW, Cornel MC, Gaasterland CMW, van Eeghen AM. Improving care for rare genetic neurodevelopmental disorders: A systematic review and critical appraisal of clinical practice guidelines using AGREE II. Genet Med 2024; 26:101071. [PMID: 38224026 DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2024.101071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Revised: 12/08/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/16/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Rare genetic neurodevelopmental disorders associated with intellectual disability require lifelong multidisciplinary care. Clinical practice guidelines may support healthcare professionals in their daily practice, but guideline development for rare conditions can be challenging. In this systematic review, the characteristics and methodological quality of internationally published recommendations for this population are described to provide an overview of current guidelines and inform future efforts of European Reference Network ITHACA (Intellectual disability, TeleHealth, Autism, and Congenital Anomalies). METHODS MEDLINE, Embase, and Orphanet were systematically searched to identify guidelines for conditions classified as "rare genetic intellectual disability" (ORPHA:183757). Methodological quality was assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines, Research, and Evaluation II tool. RESULTS Seventy internationally published guidelines, addressing the diagnosis and/or management of 28 conditions, were included. The methodological rigor of development was highly variable with limited reporting of literature searches and consensus methods. Stakeholder involvement and editorial independence varied as well. Implementation was rarely addressed. CONCLUSION Comprehensive, high-quality guidelines are lacking for many rare genetic neurodevelopmental disorders. Use and transparent reporting of sound development methodologies, active involvement of affected individuals and families, robust conflict of interest procedures, and attention to implementation are vital for enhancing the impact of clinical practice recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mirthe J Klein Haneveld
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; European Reference Network on Rare Congenital Malformations and Rare Intellectual Disability ERN-ITHACA, Clinical Genetics Department, Robert Debré University Hospital, Paris, France; Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Iméze J Hieltjes
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Knowledge Institute of the Dutch Association of Medical Specialists, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Miranda W Langendam
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Martina C Cornel
- Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Human Genetics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Charlotte M W Gaasterland
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; European Reference Network on Rare Congenital Malformations and Rare Intellectual Disability ERN-ITHACA, Clinical Genetics Department, Robert Debré University Hospital, Paris, France; Knowledge Institute of the Dutch Association of Medical Specialists, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Agnies M van Eeghen
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; European Reference Network on Rare Congenital Malformations and Rare Intellectual Disability ERN-ITHACA, Clinical Genetics Department, Robert Debré University Hospital, Paris, France; Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Advisium, 's Heeren Loo Zorggroep, Amersfoort, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Gao YC, Cao R, Liu ZH, Liao YD, Tao LY, Feng YT, Chai QY, Luo MJ, Fei YT. Comprehensive consideration of multiple determinants from evidence to recommendations in guidelines for most traditional Chinese medicine was suboptimal: a systematic review. BMC Complement Med Ther 2024; 24:19. [PMID: 38178118 PMCID: PMC10765706 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-023-04321-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The overall comprehensive consideration of the factors influencing the recommendations in the traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) guidelines remains poorly studied. This study systematically evaluate the factors influencing recommendations formation in the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) and TCM CPGs. METHODS This was a methodological review in which we searched six databases and multiple related websites. The GRADE CPGs were identified as the guidelines developed by the GRADE Working Group or the two Co-Chairs. For the TCM CPGs, we randomly selected guidelines that were published by the TCM or integrative medicine academic societies from China mainland (published by the TCM or integrative medicine academic societies of China mainland). Two reviewers independently screened and extracted data. We included CPGs published in 2018-2022. We extracted information on the influencing factors of evidence to recommendation and conducted the analyses using descriptive statistics and calculated the proportion of relevant items by IBM SPSS Statistics and Microsoft Excel to compare the differences between the GRADE CPGs and the TCM CPGs. RESULTS Forty-five GRADE CPGs (including 912 recommendations) and 88 TCM CPGs (including 2452 recommendations) were included. TCM recommendations mainly considered the four key determinants of desirable anticipated effects, undesirable anticipated effects, balance between desirable and undesirable effects, certainty of evidence, with less than 20% of other dimensions. And TCM CPGs presented more strong recommendations (for or against) and inappropriate discordant recommendations than GRADE CPGs. GRADE CPGs were more comprehensive considered about the factors affecting the recommendations, and considered more than 70% of all factors in the evidence to recommendation. CONCLUSIONS The TCM CPGs lack a comprehensive consideration of multiple influencing determinants from evidence to recommendations. In the future, the correct application of the GRADE approaches should be emphasized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi-Cheng Gao
- Centre for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
- Institute of Excellence in Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
- Beijing GRADE Centre, Beijing, China
| | - Rui Cao
- Centre for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
- Institute of Excellence in Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
- Beijing GRADE Centre, Beijing, China
| | - Zhi-Han Liu
- Centre for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
- Institute of Excellence in Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
- Beijing GRADE Centre, Beijing, China
- Kunming Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Kunming, China
| | - Ying-Di Liao
- Kunming Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Kunming, China
| | - Li-Yuan Tao
- Research Center of Clinical Epidemiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yu-Ting Feng
- Centre for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
- Institute of Excellence in Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
- Beijing GRADE Centre, Beijing, China
| | - Qian-Yun Chai
- Centre for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
- Institute of Excellence in Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
- Beijing GRADE Centre, Beijing, China
| | - Min-Jing Luo
- Centre for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
- Institute of Excellence in Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
- Beijing GRADE Centre, Beijing, China
| | - Yu-Tong Fei
- Centre for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
- Institute of Excellence in Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
- Beijing GRADE Centre, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Satheesh G, Dhurjati R, Balagopalan JP, Mohanan PP, Salam A. Comparison of Indian clinical practice guidelines for the management of hypertension with the World Health Organization, International Society of Hypertension, American, and European guidelines. Indian Heart J 2024; 76:6-9. [PMID: 38171390 PMCID: PMC10943557 DOI: 10.1016/j.ihj.2023.12.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2023] [Accepted: 12/28/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Hypertension is the leading risk factor for preventable cardiovascular diseases and all-cause mortality globally, with majority of the hypertension-attributed deaths occurring in low- and middle-income countries like India. Several international and national clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) provide evidence-informed recommendations to achieve optimal control. CPGs produced by the World Health Organization, International Society for Hypertension, American (AHA/ACC-2017), and European (ESC/ESH-2018) are "major" as they are widely used and are highly cited. We compared the main recommendations for the pharmacological management of hypertension among the major CPGs and the two existing Indian CPGs for similarities and shortcomings. Several deviations from the major CPGs were observed among Indian CPGs. Important shortcomings pertain to Indian CPGs' low priority for initial combination therapy and the use of single pill combinations. Having multiple CPGs providing conflicting recommendations might discourage the adoption of evidence-based practices. There is a need for updating Indian CPGs based on up-to-date evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gautam Satheesh
- The George Institute for Global Health, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
| | - Rupasvi Dhurjati
- The George Institute for Global Health, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
| | | | - Padinhare P Mohanan
- Department of Cardiology, West Fort Hi-Tech Hospital, Thrissur, Kerala, India
| | - Abdul Salam
- The George Institute for Global Health, Hyderabad, Telangana, India; The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Prasanna School of Public Health, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, India.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Godwin PO, Polsonetti B, Caron MF, Oppelt TF. Remdesivir for the Treatment of COVID-19: A Narrative Review. Infect Dis Ther 2024; 13:1-19. [PMID: 38193988 PMCID: PMC10828241 DOI: 10.1007/s40121-023-00900-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Despite the wide availability of effective vaccines, COVID-19 continues to be an infectious disease of global importance. Remdesivir is a broad-spectrum antiviral and was the first US Food and Drug Administration-approved treatment for COVID-19. In clinical guidelines, remdesivir is currently the only recommended antiviral for use in hospitalized patients with COVID-19, with or without a supplemental oxygen requirement. It is also recommended for nonhospitalized patients with COVID-19 and hospitalized patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection who are at high risk of progression to severe disease. This narrative review explores the evidence for remdesivir across various clinical outcomes and evolution of clinical guidelines through a survey over time of randomized controlled trials, observational studies, and meta-analyses. Remdesivir, compared to standard of care, appears to improve survival and disease progression in a variety of patient populations with COVID-19 across a spectrum of disease severity and SARS-CoV-2 variant periods. Remdesivir also appears to improve time to clinical recovery, increase rate of recovery, and reduce time on supplemental oxygen and readmission rates. More recent large, real-world studies further support the early use of remdesivir in a range of patient populations, including those with immunocompromising conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick O Godwin
- Department of Medicine, Division of Academic Internal Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Mas-Llado C, Gonzalez-Del-Hoyo M, Siquier-Padilla J, Blaya-Peña L, Coughlan JJ, García de la Villa B, Peral V, Rossello X. Representativeness in randomised clinical trials supporting acute coronary syndrome guidelines. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes 2023; 9:796-805. [PMID: 36702530 PMCID: PMC10745262 DOI: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcad007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2022] [Revised: 01/12/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
AIMS Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are published to guide the management of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We aimed to critically appraise the representativeness and standard of care of randomised clinical trials (RCTs) supporting CPGs for ACS. METHODS AND RESULTS American and European CPGs for ST- and non-ST-elevation ACS were screened to extract all references (n = 2128) and recommendations (n = 600). Among the 407 primary publications of RCTs (19.1%), there were 52.6 and 73.2% recruiting patients in North America and Europe, respectively, whereas other regions were largely under-represented (e.g. 25.3% RCTs recruited in Asia). There was 68.6% RCTs enrolling patient with ACS, whereas the remaining 31.4% did not enrol any patient with ACS. There was under-representation of some important subgroups, including elderly, female (29.9%), and non-white patients (<20%). The incidence and type of reperfusion reported in these RCTs were not reflective of current clinical practice (the percentage of patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) among all RCTs was 42.7%; whereas for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction patients, the number of participants who underwent fibrinolysis was 3.3-fold higher than those who underwent primary PCI). All-cause mortality in these RCTs was 11.9% in RCTs with a follow-up ≤ 1 year. CONCLUSION Randomised clinical trials supporting CPGs for ACS are not fully representative of the diversity of the ACS population and their current standard of care. While some of these issues with representativeness may be explained by how evidence has been accrued over time, efforts should be made by trialists to ensure that the evidence supporting CPGs is representative of the wider ACS population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caterina Mas-Llado
- Cardiology Department, Hospital de Manacor, 07500 Manacor, Spain
- Fisiopatología y Terapéutica Cardiovascular, Health Research Institute of the Balearic Islands (IdISBa), 07122 Palma, Spain
- Facultad de Medicina, Universitat de les Illes Balears (UIB), Palma, Spain
| | - Maribel Gonzalez-Del-Hoyo
- Fisiopatología y Terapéutica Cardiovascular, Health Research Institute of the Balearic Islands (IdISBa), 07122 Palma, Spain
- Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitari Son Espases, Health Research Institute of the Balearic Islands (IdISBa), 07122 Palma, Spain
| | - Joan Siquier-Padilla
- Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitari Son Espases, Health Research Institute of the Balearic Islands (IdISBa), 07122 Palma, Spain
| | - Laura Blaya-Peña
- Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitari Son Espases, Health Research Institute of the Balearic Islands (IdISBa), 07122 Palma, Spain
| | - J J Coughlan
- Cardiology Department, Deutsches Herzzentrum München und Technische Universität München, 80636 Munich, Germany
- Cardiology Department, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Mater Private Network, D07 KWR1 Dublin, Ireland
| | - Bernardo García de la Villa
- Cardiology Department, Hospital de Manacor, 07500 Manacor, Spain
- Fisiopatología y Terapéutica Cardiovascular, Health Research Institute of the Balearic Islands (IdISBa), 07122 Palma, Spain
| | - Vicente Peral
- Fisiopatología y Terapéutica Cardiovascular, Health Research Institute of the Balearic Islands (IdISBa), 07122 Palma, Spain
- Facultad de Medicina, Universitat de les Illes Balears (UIB), Palma, Spain
- Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitari Son Espases, Health Research Institute of the Balearic Islands (IdISBa), 07122 Palma, Spain
| | - Xavier Rossello
- Fisiopatología y Terapéutica Cardiovascular, Health Research Institute of the Balearic Islands (IdISBa), 07122 Palma, Spain
- Facultad de Medicina, Universitat de les Illes Balears (UIB), Palma, Spain
- Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitari Son Espases, Health Research Institute of the Balearic Islands (IdISBa), 07122 Palma, Spain
- Translational Laboratory for Cardiovascular Imaging and Therapy, Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares (CNIC), 28029 Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Al-Ashwal A, Alsagheir A, Al Dubayee M, Al-Khnifsawi M, Al-Sarraf A, Awan Z, Ben-Omran T, Al-Yaarubi S, Almutair A, Habeb A, Maatouk F, Alshareef M, Kholaif N, Blom D. Modern approaches to the management of homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia in the Middle East and North Africa. J Clin Lipidol 2023:S1933-2874(23)00352-5. [PMID: 38158247 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacl.2023.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2023] [Revised: 12/01/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
Homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (HoFH) is a severe form of FH in which inheritance of two defective or null mutations in genes associated with metabolism of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) results in extremely high LDL-C, premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and mortality. Treatment of HoFH comprises a multi-modal approach of statins, ezetimibe, lipoprotein apheresis; and inhibitors of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type, angiopoietin-like protein 3 (ANGPTL3) and microsomal triglyceride transfer protein. These treatments are generally costly, and patients also often require treatment for ASCVD consequent to HoFH. Therefore, in the interests of both economics and preservation of life, disease prevention via genetic screening and counselling is rapidly becoming a key element in the overall management of HoFH. Guidelines are available to assist diagnosis and treatment of HoFH; however, while advancements have been made in the management of the disease, there has been little systematic attention paid to prevention. Additionally, the Middle East/North Africa (MENA) region has a higher prevalence of HoFH than most other regions - chiefly due to consanguinity. This has led to the establishment of regional lipid clinics and awareness programs that have thrown education and awareness of HoFH into sharp focus. Incorporation of principles of prevention, education, awareness, and data from real-world use of existing therapeutics will significantly enhance the effectiveness of future guidelines for the management of HoFH, particularly in the MENA region.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdullah Al-Ashwal
- Medical & Clinical Affairs, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia (Dr Al-Ashwal)
| | - Afaf Alsagheir
- Pediatrics Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia (Dr Alsagheir)
| | - Mohammed Al Dubayee
- College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh 11426, Saudi Arabia (Dr Al Dubayee)
| | | | - Ahmed Al-Sarraf
- Sabah Al Ahmad Cardiac Center, Department Cardiology, Ministry of Health, Kuwait (Dr Al-Sarraf)
| | - Zuhier Awan
- Division of Clinical Biochemistry, King Abdulaziz University, Abdullah Sulayman, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia (Dr Awan)
| | - Tawfeg Ben-Omran
- Division of Genetics and Genomic Medicine, Sidra Medicine and Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar (Dr Ben-Omran)
| | - Saif Al-Yaarubi
- Oman Medical Specialty Board, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman (Dr Al-Yaarubi)
| | - Angham Almutair
- King Abdullah Specialised Children's Hospital, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia (Dr Almutair)
| | - Abdelhadi Habeb
- Pediatric Department, Prince Mohamed Bin Abdulaziz Hospital, Madinah, Saudi Arabia (Dr Habeb)
| | - Faouzi Maatouk
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Fattouma Bourguiba University Hospital, Tunisia (Dr Maatouk)
| | - Manal Alshareef
- National Guard Hospital, Prince Mutib Ibn Abdullah Rd, National Guard District, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia (Dr Alshareef)
| | - Naji Kholaif
- Heart Centre Cardiology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia (Dr Kholaif); Alfaisal University College of Medicine, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia (Dr Kholaif)
| | - Dirk Blom
- Division of Lipidology, Department of Medicine and Cape Heart Institute, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa (Dr Blom)
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Poduval M, Kambhampati SBS, Vishwanathan K. A Review of Various Clinical Practice Guidelines on Osteoporosis in the Last 5 Years. Indian J Orthop 2023; 57:7-24. [PMID: 38107812 PMCID: PMC10721745 DOI: 10.1007/s43465-023-01031-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2023] [Accepted: 10/21/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
Background Osteoporosis, also called the silent disease, affects the elderly with a significant contribution to their morbidity and mortality through fragility fractures. Most nations have developed their own guidelines on managing this condition. Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) are the highest quality evidence documents on a particular topic prepared by expert panels. CPGs offer standardised recommendations on a particular topic. Methods We looked at the CPGs of nations in the last five years and present the results of this review here. This review is divided into Risk assessment, prevention, diagnosis, Non pharmacological and pharmacological management with information from major CPGs only. Results Most CPGs agree on the broad principles of assessment , core risk factors, prevention and management with some finer differences in subtle aspects of assessment and management. There are differences in the use of screening tools based on the population numbers and affordability between nations. FRAX has been advocated for the screening with or without DEXA. Most CPGs use DEXA for confirmation of diagnosis. Intervention is based on FRAX scoring. Intervention thresholds vary. We discuss non-pharmacological management included diet and nutrition, calcium and Vitamin D, Exercise and physiotherapy, lifestyle changes and falls prevention. Pharmacological management included aspects of using different medications and their indications. The key agents recommended include Bisphosphonates, Teriparatide, Denosumab, SERMs, Hormone Replacement Therapy, and other agents including any drug holidays and duration of therapy. Conclusions This review identified some key recommendations from CPGs from multiple nations in each of the above given aspects of osteoporosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Murali Poduval
- Lifesciences Engineering, Tata Consultancy Services, Mumbai, India
| | | | - Karthik Vishwanathan
- Department of Orthopedics, Parul Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Parul University, Vadodara, Gujarat India
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Overland MR, Trandem K, Allen IE, Copp HL. Revisiting the utility of prenatal ultrasound in the routine workup of first febrile UTI: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the negative predictive value of prenatal ultrasound for identification of urinary tract abnormalities after first febrile urinary tract infection in children. J Pediatr Urol 2023; 19:754-765. [PMID: 37704528 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2023.08.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Revised: 06/06/2023] [Accepted: 08/17/2023] [Indexed: 09/15/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT The current EAU/ESPU and recently retired AAP pediatric UTI guidelines recommend renal bladder ultrasound after first febrile UTI in children to screen for structural abnormalities, regardless of findings on prenatal ultrasound. OBJECTIVE Test the hypothesis that a normal prenatal ultrasound could rule out urinary tract abnormality on post-UTI ultrasound. DATA SOURCES Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library. STUDY SELECTION Studies including pediatric patients with first febrile UTI who had both prenatal and post-UTI ultrasound. DATA EXTRACTION Anatomical abnormalities detected by prenatal and post-UTI ultrasound as reported per individual study criteria were extracted. Meta-analyses of 9 studies (2981 patients) were performed using a random-effects model and composite estimates of the negative predictive value (NPV) of prenatal ultrasound were calculated. RESULTS Overall summary NPV of prenatal ultrasound for all pediatric patients was 77%, with heterogeneity score (I2) 97.9%. Summary NPV of prenatal ultrasound for all patients under two years of age was similar at 75%, with I2 98.2% For the 4 studies to which we could apply a more stringent definition of abnormality, summary NPV was 85% and I2 97.5% for prediction of moderate post-UTI ultrasound abnormalities and summary NPV was 93% and I2 90.4% for severe abnormalities. DISCUSSION While we calculated an 85% NPV for a normal prenatal ultrasound to rule out significant postnatal abnormality as defined within individual studies, substantial heterogeneity amongst publications limited the precision of our estimates. This highlights the need for more rigorous investigations with attention to timing of ultrasound and the application of clinically meaningful definitions for abnormal prenatal and post-UTI studies. This may allow judicious use of prenatal ultrasound to guide clinical management for children with first febrile UTI and minimize redundant imaging with potential for false positive results. Until then, the current guidelines are justified based on the limited and heterogenous data from the currently available published studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maya R Overland
- Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, United States
| | - Kathryn Trandem
- Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, United States
| | - Isabel Elaine Allen
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, United States
| | - Hillary L Copp
- Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Zheng R, Fan Y, Guan B, Fu R, Yao L, Wang W, Li G, Zhou Y, Chen L, Feng S, Zhou H. A critical appraisal of clinical practice guidelines on surgical treatments for spinal cord injury. Spine J 2023; 23:1739-1749. [PMID: 37339698 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.06.385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2023] [Revised: 05/10/2023] [Accepted: 06/14/2023] [Indexed: 06/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a global health problem with a heavy economic burden. Surgery is considered as the cornerstone of SCI treatment. Although various organizations have formulated different guidelines on surgical treatment for SCI, the methodological quality of these guidelines has still not been critically appraised. PURPOSE We aim to systematically review and appraise the current guidelines on surgical treatments of SCI and summarize the related recommendations with the quality evaluation of supporting evidence. STUDY DESIGN Systematic review. METHODS Medline, Cochrane library, Web of Science, Embase, Google Scholar, and online guideline databases were searched from January 2000 to January 2022. The most updated and recent guidelines containing evidence-based or consensus-based recommendations and established by authoritative associations were included. The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation, 2nd edition instrument containing 6 domains (eg, applicability) was used to appraise the included guidelines. An evidence-grading scale (ie, level of evidence, LOE) was utilized to evaluate the quality of supporting evidence. The supporting evidence was categorized as A (the best quality), B, C, and D (the worst quality). RESULTS Ten guidelines from 2008 to 2020 were included, however, all of them acquired the lowest scores in the domain of applicability among all the six domains. Fourteen recommendations (eight evidence-based recommendations and six consensus-based recommendations) were totally involved. The SCI types of the population and timing of surgery were studied. Regarding the SCI types of the population, eight guidelines (8/10, 80%), two guidelines (2/10, 20%), and three guidelines (3/10, 30%) recommended surgical treatment for patients with SCI without further clarification of characteristics, incomplete SCI, and traumatic central cord syndrome (TCCS), respectively. Besides, one guideline (1/10, 10%) recommended against surgery for patients with SCI without radiographic abnormality. Regarding the timing of surgery, there were eight guidelines (8/10, 80%), two guidelines (2/10, 20%), and two guidelines (2/10, 20%) with recommendations for patients with SCI without further clarification of characteristics, incomplete SCI, and TCCS, respectively. For patients with SCI without further clarification of characteristics, all eight guidelines (8/8, 100%) recommended for early surgery and five guidelines (5/8, 62.5%) recommended for the specific timing, which ranged from within 8 hours to within 48 hours. For patients with incomplete SCI, two guidelines (2/2, 100%) recommended for early surgery, without specific time thresholds. For patients with TCCS, one guideline (1/2, 50%) recommended for surgery within 24 hours, and another guideline (1/2, 50%) simply recommended for early surgery. The LOE was B in eight recommendations, C in three recommendations, and D in three recommendations. CONCLUSIONS We remind the reader that even the highest quality guidelines often have significant flaws (eg, poor applicability), and some of the conclusions are based on consensus recommendations which is certainly less than ideal. With these caveats, we found most included guidelines (8/10, 80%) recommended early surgical treatment for patients after SCI, which was consistent between evidence-based recommendations and consensus-based recommendations. Regarding the specific timing of surgery, the recommended time threshold did vary, but it was usually within 8 to 48 hours, where the LOE was B to D.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruiyuan Zheng
- Department of Orthopaedics, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Shandong University Centre for Orthopaedics, Advanced Medical Research Institute, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, P.R. China
| | - Yuxuan Fan
- Department of Orthopaedics, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, International Science and Technology Cooperation Base of Spinal Cord Injury, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Spine and Spinal Cord, Tianjin, 300052, P.R. China
| | - Bin Guan
- Department of Orthopaedics, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Shandong University Centre for Orthopaedics, Advanced Medical Research Institute, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, P.R. China
| | - Runhan Fu
- Department of Orthopaedics, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Shandong University Centre for Orthopaedics, Advanced Medical Research Institute, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, P.R. China
| | - Liang Yao
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Canada
| | - Wei Wang
- Department of Orthopaedics, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Shandong University Centre for Orthopaedics, Advanced Medical Research Institute, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, P.R. China
| | - Guoyu Li
- Department of Orthopaedics, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Shandong University Centre for Orthopaedics, Advanced Medical Research Institute, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, P.R. China
| | - Yue Zhou
- Department of Orthopedics, Xinqiao Hospital, The Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400000, P.R. China
| | - Lingxiao Chen
- Department of Orthopaedics, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Shandong University Centre for Orthopaedics, Advanced Medical Research Institute, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, P.R. China; Sydney Musculoskeletal Health, The Kolling Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Shiqing Feng
- Department of Orthopaedics, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Shandong University Centre for Orthopaedics, Advanced Medical Research Institute, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, P.R. China; Department of Orthopaedics, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, International Science and Technology Cooperation Base of Spinal Cord Injury, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Spine and Spinal Cord, Tianjin, 300052, P.R. China
| | - Hengxing Zhou
- Department of Orthopaedics, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Shandong University Centre for Orthopaedics, Advanced Medical Research Institute, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, P.R. China; Department of Orthopaedics, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, International Science and Technology Cooperation Base of Spinal Cord Injury, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Spine and Spinal Cord, Tianjin, 300052, P.R. China.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
O'Connell N, Moore RA, Stewart G, Fisher E, Hearn L, Eccleston C, Wewege M, De C Williams AC. Trials We Cannot Trust: Investigating Their Impact on Systematic Reviews and Clinical Guidelines in Spinal Pain. J Pain 2023; 24:2103-2130. [PMID: 37453533 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2023.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Revised: 06/23/2023] [Accepted: 07/01/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
We previously conducted an exploration of the trustworthiness of a group of clinical trials of cognitive-behavioral therapy and exercise in spinal pain. We identified multiple concerns in 8 trials, judging them untrustworthy. In this study, we systematically explored the impact of these trials ("index trials") on results, conclusions, and recommendations of systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). We conducted forward citation tracking using Google Scholar and the citationchaser tool, searched the Guidelines International Network library and National Institute of Health and Care Excellence archive to June 2022 to identify systematic reviews and CPGs. We explored how index trials impacted their findings. Where reviews presented meta-analyses, we extracted or conducted sensitivity analyses for the outcomes of pain and disability, to explore how the exclusion of index trials affected effect estimates. We developed and applied an 'Impact Index' to categorize the extent to which index studies impacted their results. We included 32 unique reviews and 10 CPGs. None directly raised concerns regarding the veracity of the trials. Across meta-analyses (55 comparisons), the removal of index trials reduced effect sizes by a median of 58% (Inter Quartlie Range (IQR) 40-74). 85% of comparisons were classified as highly, 3% as moderately, and 11% as minimally impacted. Nine out of 10 reviews conducting narrative synthesis drew positive conclusions regarding the intervention tested. Nine out of 10 CPGs made positive recommendations for the intervention(s) evaluated. This cohort of trials, with concerns regarding trustworthiness, has substantially impacted the results of systematic reviews and guideline recommendations. PERSPECTIVE: We found that a group of trials of CBT for spinal pain with concerns relating to their trustworthiness has had substantial impacts on the analyses and conclusions of systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines. This highlights the need for a greater focus on the trustworthiness of studies in evidence appraisal. PRE-REGISTRATION: Our protocol was preregistered on the Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/m92ax/.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neil O'Connell
- Centre for Health and Wellbeing Across the Lifecourse, Department of Health Sciences, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, UK
| | | | - Gavin Stewart
- School of Natural and Environmental Sciences, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle, UK
| | - Emma Fisher
- Centre for Pain Research, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, UK
| | - Leslie Hearn
- Cochrane Pain, Palliative and Supportive Care Review Group, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, UK
| | - Christopher Eccleston
- Centre for Pain Research, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, UK; Department of Psychology, University of Helsinki, Finland; Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Belgium, Finland
| | - Michael Wewege
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia; Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia
| | - Amanda C De C Williams
- Research Department of Clinical, Educational & Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Ramos Salas X, Saquimux Contreras MA, Breen C, Preiss Y, Hussey B, Forhan M, Wharton S, Campbell-Scherer D, Vallis M, Brown J, Pedersen SD, Sharma AM, Woodward E, Patton I, Pearce N. Review of an international pilot project to adapt the Canadian Adult Obesity Clinical Practice Guideline. Obes Pillars 2023; 8:100090. [PMID: 38125658 PMCID: PMC10728699 DOI: 10.1016/j.obpill.2023.100090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2023] [Revised: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
Background The evidence-based Canadian Adult Obesity Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) released in August 2020 were developed through a systematic literature review and patient-oriented research process. This CPG is considered a paradigm shift for obesity care as it introduced a new obesity definition that is based on health not body size, incorporates lived experiences of people affected by obesity, and addresses the pervasive weight bias and stigma that patients face in healthcare systems. The purpose of this pilot project was to assess the feasibility of adapting the Canadian CPG in Chile and Ireland. Methods An International Clinical Practice Guideline Adaptation Committee was established to oversee the project. The project was conducted through four interrelated phases: 1) planning and preparation; 2) pilot project application process; 3) adaptation; and 4) launch, dissemination, and implementation. Ireland used the GRADE-ADAPTE framework and Chile used the GRADE-ADOLOPMENT approach. Results Chile and Ireland developed their adapted guidelines in one third of the time it took to develop the Canadian guidelines. In Ireland, 18 chapters, which underpin the 80 key recommendations, were contextually adapted. Chile adopted 18 chapters and 76 recommendations, adapted one recommendation, and developed 12 new recommendations.
. Conclusion The pilot project demonstrated it is feasible to adapt the Canadian CPG for use in other countries with different healthcare systems, languages, and cultural contexts, while retaining the Canadian CPG's key principles and values such as the treatment of obesity as a chronic disease, adoption of new clinical assessment approaches that go beyond anthropometric measurements, elimination of weight bias and stigma, shifting obesity care outcomes to improved health and well-being rather than weight loss alone, and the use of patient-centred, collaborative and shared-decision clinical care approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Miguel Alejandro Saquimux Contreras
- Universidade Estadual de Campinas - UNICAMP, Centro de Pesquisas em Saúde Reprodutiva de Campinas – CEMICAMP, Rua Vital Brasil, 200 Cidade Universitária, Campinas, SP, 13083-888, Brazil
| | - Cathy Breen
- Association for the Study of Obesity on the island of Ireland, Level 3 and 4 Obesity Services, St Columcille's and St Vincent's University Hospitals, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Yudith Preiss
- Sociedad Chilena de Cirugía Bariátrica y Metabólica, Centro Medico Novamed, Lo Fontecilla 101, oficina 201-202, Las Condes, RM, Chile
| | - Brad Hussey
- Replica Communications, 156 Melville Street, Dundas, Ontario, L9H 2A8, Canada
| | - Mary Forhan
- Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Toronto, 160 – 500 University Ave., 9th floor, Toronto, ON, M5G 1V7, Canada
| | - Sean Wharton
- McMaster University, Wharton Medical Clinic, 2951 Walkers Line, Burlington, Ontario, L7M 4Y1, Canada
| | - Denise Campbell-Scherer
- University of Alberta, 2-590B Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, 11405 - 87 Ave NW, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1C9, Canada
| | - Michael Vallis
- Dalhousie University Family Medicine, 1465 Brenton Street, Suite 402, Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3J 3T4, Canada
| | - Jennifer Brown
- Obesity Canada, 2-126 Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Research Innovation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2E1, Canada
| | - Sue D. Pedersen
- C-ENDO Diabetes and Endocrinology Clinic, Rockyview Health Centre II, Suite 210, 1016-68 Avenue SW, Calgary, Alberta, T2V 4J2, Canada
| | - Arya M. Sharma
- University of Alberta, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, 2J2.00 Walter C Mackenzie Health Sciences Centre, 8440 112 St. NW, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2R7, Canada
| | - Euan Woodward
- European Association for the Study of Obesity, Level 2, 8 Waldergrave Road, Teddington, Middlesex, TW11 8GT, United Kingdom
| | - Ian Patton
- Obesity Canada, 2-126 Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Research Innovation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2E1, Canada
| | - Nicole Pearce
- Obesity Canada, 2-126 Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Research Innovation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2E1, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Nafees A, Khan M, Chow R, Fazelzad R, Hope A, Liu G, Letourneau D, Raman S. Evaluation of clinical decision support systems in oncology: An updated systematic review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2023; 192:104143. [PMID: 37742884 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2023.104143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Revised: 09/17/2023] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023] Open
Abstract
With increasing reliance on technology in oncology, the impact of digital clinical decision support (CDS) tools needs to be examined. A systematic review update was conducted and peer-reviewed literature from 2016 to 2022 were included if CDS tools were used for live decision making and comparatively assessed quantitative outcomes. 3369 studies were screened and 19 were included in this updated review. Combined with a previous review of 24 studies, a total of 43 studies were analyzed. Improvements in outcomes were observed in 42 studies, and 34 of these were of statistical significance. Computerized physician order entry and clinical practice guideline systems comprise the greatest number of evaluated CDS tools (13 and 10 respectively), followed by those that utilize patient-reported outcomes (8), clinical pathway systems (8) and prescriber alerts for best-practice advisories (4). Our review indicates that CDS can improve guideline adherence, patient-centered care, and care delivery processes in oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdulwadud Nafees
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Hospital Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Maha Khan
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Hospital Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Ronald Chow
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Hospital Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada; Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Applied Sciences & Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Library and Information Services, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Rouhi Fazelzad
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Applied Sciences & Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Library and Information Services, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Andrew Hope
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Hospital Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Geoffrey Liu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Daniel Letourneau
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Hospital Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Srinivas Raman
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Hospital Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Mc Allister M, Florez ID, Stoker S, McCaul M. Advancing guideline quality through country-wide and regional quality assessment of CPGs using AGREE: a scoping review. BMC Med Res Methodol 2023; 23:283. [PMID: 38036974 PMCID: PMC10690993 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-023-02101-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2022] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 12/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are evaluated for quality with the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) tool, and this is increasingly done for different countries and regional groupings. This scoping review aimed to describe, map, and compare these geographical synthesis studies, that assessed CPG quality using the AGREE tool. This allowed a global interpretation of the current landscape of these country-wide or regional synthesis studies, and a closer look at its methodology and results. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS A scoping review was conducted searching databases Medline, Embase, Epistemonikos, and grey literature on 5 October 2021 for synthesis studies using the later versions of AGREE (AGREE II, AGREE-REX and AGREE GRS) to evaluate country-wide or regional CPG quality. Country-wide or regional synthesis studies were the units of analysis, and simple descriptive statistics was used to conduct the analysis. AGREE scores were analysed across subgroups into one of the seven Sustainable Development Goal regions, to allow for meaningful interpretation. RESULTS Fifty-seven studies fulfilled our eligibility criteria, which had included a total of 2918 CPGs. Regions of the Global North, and Eastern and South-Eastern Asia were most represented. Studies were consistent in reporting and presenting their AGREE domain and overall results, but only 18% (n = 10) reported development methods, and 19% (n = 11) reported use of Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). Overall scores for domains Rigor of development and Editorial independence were low, notably in middle-income countries. Editorial Independence scores, especially, were low across all regions with a maximum domain score of 46%. There were no studies from low-income countries. CONCLUSION There is an increasing tendency to appraise country-wide and regionally grouped CPGs, using quality appraisal tools. The AGREE tool, evaluated in this scoping review, was used well and consistently across studies. Findings of low report rates of development of CPGs and of use of GRADE is concerning, as is low domain scores globally for Editorial Independence. Transparent reporting of funding and competing interests, as well as highlighting evidence-to-decision processes, should assist in further improving CPG quality as clinicians are in dire need of high-quality guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marli Mc Allister
- Department of Global Health, Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Francie Van Zijl Drive TYGERBERG 7505, Cape Town, South Africa.
| | - Ivan D Florez
- Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Antioquia, Medellin, Colombia
- School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
- Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Clinica Las Americas AUNA, Medellin, Colombia
| | - Suzaan Stoker
- Department of Global Health, Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Francie Van Zijl Drive TYGERBERG 7505, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Michael McCaul
- Department of Global Health, Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Francie Van Zijl Drive TYGERBERG 7505, Cape Town, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Buitrago JM, Kolbe RJ, Siqueira MF. Dental unit waterline testing practices: an 11-Year retrospective study. BMC Oral Health 2023; 23:867. [PMID: 37968643 PMCID: PMC10652605 DOI: 10.1186/s12903-023-03590-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2023] [Accepted: 10/27/2023] [Indexed: 11/17/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This retrospective study examined the dental unit waterline (DUWL) testing practices of Saskatchewan dental clinics over a period of 11 years, with an emphasis on their responses after identification of high microbial levels. MATERIALS AND METHODS Dental clinics (n = 137) aseptically collected samples of output water from their air/water syringes, handpieces, and ultrasonic scaler lines using Sigma-Aldrich® waterline test kits and delivered them to a quality assurance laboratory. Tests were incubated for seven days at room temperature, and those with heterotrophic plate counts > 500 CFU/mL were reported as failures. Statistical analyses were performed on a database containing 4,093 test results. RESULTS Participating clinics submitted an average of 11 DUWL tests per year. Overall, 21% of tests failed, and a moderate positive association (rs=.52, p < 0.001) was found between clinics' DUWL testing frequency and failure rate. Only 7% of failed DUWL tests were followed up by collection of a subsequent test within two weeks, of which 47% still exceeded the 500 CFU/mL threshold. CONCLUSIONS Our findings demonstrate an association between DUWL testing frequency and detection of unacceptable microbial levels, along with infrequent retesting and often-inadequate intervention after a failed test. This suggests the need for further efforts at the regulatory and educational levels to maintain adequate water quality during dental treatment. CLINICAL RELEVANCE Procedural water can become contaminated in DUWLs and endanger patients. Regular DUWL monitoring and evidence-based interventions to treat contaminated systems are necessary to safeguard patient health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan M Buitrago
- College of Dentistry, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| | - Rob J Kolbe
- College of Dentistry, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Liang C, Yin G, Lin Z, Cui J, Wang Y, Liu S, Yin D, Liu P, Su X, Rong H, Wang C, Sun F, Fei Y. How well did the consensus methods apply in the guideline development of traditional Chinese medicine: a web-based survey in China. BMC Med Res Methodol 2023; 23:264. [PMID: 37950155 PMCID: PMC10636859 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-023-02087-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2023] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Consensus methods are crucial in developing clinical guidelines. Different methods, such as the Delphi and nominal group techniques, are commonly used, but there is a lack of detailed instructions on how to implement them effectively. The survey aims to explore the opinions and attitudes of the chair, panel and working group on the critical elements of the consensus methods during guideline development. METHODS We used a cross-sectional design to conduct this study and sent a structured questionnaire to stakeholders, including the chair, panel members, and working group participants, through the popular mobile phone application WeChat.We selected participants using a combination of purposive and snowball sampling. The questionnaire gathered information on demographics, experiences, opinions, and concerns regarding consensus methods and guideline development. RESULTS The sample comprised 290 participants representing 31 provinces or municipalities. Among them, the most significant number of respondents (n = 107, 36.9%) were from Beijing. Most participants, specifically 211 (72.76%), held senior professional titles, while 186 (64.14%) adhered to ongoing guidelines. The Delphi method was the most commonly used consensus method (n = 132, 42.31%), but the respondents had only a preliminary understanding of it (n = 147, 47.12%). The consensus process also revealed the insufficiency of involving pharmacoeconomists, patients, and nurses. CONCLUSIONS Consensus methods have to be standardised and used consistently in the guideline development process. The findings of this study offer insights into diverse roles and more effective ways to apply the consensus process during guideline development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Changhao Liang
- Centre for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, No. 11, North Third Ring Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, China
- Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100029, China
| | - Guanxiang Yin
- Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100029, China
| | - Ziyi Lin
- Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100029, China
| | - Jing Cui
- Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100029, China
| | - Yaqi Wang
- Centre for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, No. 11, North Third Ring Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, China
- Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100029, China
| | - Siqi Liu
- Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100029, China
| | - Dingran Yin
- Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100029, China
| | - Pengwei Liu
- Chinese Society of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100029, China
| | - Xiangfei Su
- Chinese Society of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100029, China
| | - Hongguo Rong
- Centre for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, No. 11, North Third Ring Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, China
- Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100029, China
| | - Cheng Wang
- Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Xinjiang, 830001, China
| | - Feng Sun
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, 100191, China
| | - Yutong Fei
- Centre for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, No. 11, North Third Ring Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, China.
- Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100029, China.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Bejarano G, Csiernik B, Zadro JR, Ferreira GE. Compared to what? An analysis of comparators in trials informing the National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) low back pain guideline. Braz J Phys Ther 2023; 27:100563. [PMID: 37980717 PMCID: PMC10692652 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2023.100563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2023] [Revised: 10/04/2023] [Accepted: 11/05/2023] [Indexed: 11/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low back pain (LBP) is the leading cause of disability globally. Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) have been developed in hopes of encouraging evidence-based care for LBP. However, poor quality of trials that underpin CPGs can lead to misleading recommendations for LBP. OBJECTIVES To categorize the comparator used in trials included in the National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) LBP CPG and describe the proportion and association of suboptimal comparators with NICE recommendation. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional analysis to describe the proportion of trials included in the NICE LBP CPG that used a suboptimal comparator. If comparators used an ineffective treatment, a treatment of unknown effectiveness, or no or minimal treatment then they were considered suboptimal. RESULTS We included 408 trials and analyzed 580 comparators used in the trials. 30.9% of the comparators used in the trials were suboptimal. Trials testing invasive treatments (32.4%) had the highest proportion of suboptimal comparators followed by non-surgical (32.3%) and pharmacological (19.0%) treatments. Trials using suboptimal treatments were less likely to have their treatment recommended (odds ratio: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.47, 0.98) for use by NICE. CONCLUSION There is a concerning proportion of suboptimal comparators used in LBP trials that may be misleading CPG recommendations, funding allocation decisions, and ultimately clinical practice. Efforts to increase the use of optimal comparators in LBP trials are urgently needed to better understand what treatments should be recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ben Csiernik
- Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Joshua R Zadro
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, The University of Sydney and Sydney Local Health District, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Giovanni E Ferreira
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, The University of Sydney and Sydney Local Health District, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Ozdag Y, Hayes DS, Callahan C, El Koussaify J, Warnick EP, Foster BK, Klena JC, Grandizio LC. Adherence to Complication Reporting for Randomized Controlled Trials Contained in Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. J Hand Surg Glob Online 2023; 5:779-783. [PMID: 38106925 PMCID: PMC10721492 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2023.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Accepted: 06/13/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are frequently used in creating recommendations contained within clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). However, investigations outside of hand surgery have reported that RCTs within CPGs infrequently report complications and harms-related data. Our purpose was to assess adherence to complication reporting and harms-related outcomes contained in the Consolidated Standards for Reporting (CONSORT) Extension of Harms and Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (STARD) reporting checklists for RCTs within the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgery (AAOS) CPGs for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Methods We identified all RCTs within the AAOS CTS CPGs. All therapeutic RCTs and diagnostic studies were included. We used the CONSORT Harms Checklist criteria to assess adherence to the reporting of adverse events for therapeutic RCTs and the STARD criteria to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the articles. We defined adequate compliance as adherence to ≥50% of the checklist items. Results We identified 82 therapeutic RCTs and 90 diagnostic accuracy articles within the AAOS CTS CPG. For therapeutic RCTs, we found that the average compliance with the published checklists was 19%. For diagnostic studies, the average compliance with checklists was found to be 55%. Eleven therapeutic RCTs (13%) and 60 diagnostic studies (67%) were determined to have adequate compliance for the CONSORT and STARD checklists, respectively. Conclusions Randomized controlled trials in the AAOS CPGs for CTS have low compliance with the CONSORT Extension for Harms Checklist. Although the overall adherence to the items published in the STARD statement for diagnostic accuracy evaluation remains higher, future efforts should be made to improve the adherence rates to both checklists. Clinical relevance Improved standardization of complication reporting may aid in comparing outcomes across multiple clinical investigations of upper-extremity procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yagiz Ozdag
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Geisinger Musculoskeletal Institute, Danville, PA
| | - Daniel S. Hayes
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Geisinger Musculoskeletal Institute, Danville, PA
| | - Clarice Callahan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Geisinger Musculoskeletal Institute, Danville, PA
| | - Jad El Koussaify
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Geisinger Musculoskeletal Institute, Danville, PA
| | - Eugene P. Warnick
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Geisinger Musculoskeletal Institute, Danville, PA
| | - Brian K. Foster
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Geisinger Musculoskeletal Institute, Danville, PA
| | - Joel C. Klena
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Geisinger Musculoskeletal Institute, Danville, PA
| | - Louis C. Grandizio
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Geisinger Musculoskeletal Institute, Danville, PA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Wang S, Zhang Y, Wen Z, Yang Y, Zhang Y, Geng Y, Liu Y, Zhang J. Development, Evaluation, and impLemenTation for guideline adaptation: a quality improvement protocol for the DELTA study in global health practice. Health Res Policy Syst 2023; 21:114. [PMID: 37915056 PMCID: PMC10619317 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-023-01060-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2023] [Accepted: 10/07/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Guideline adaptation is an emerging field to provide more appropriate recommendations for local clinical practice quality and to promote global health equity. However, its utilization status, adaptation procedures, and related materials remain to be studied. METHODS This study developed a quality improvement protocol for a study as the Development, Evaluation, and impLemenTation for guideline Adaptation (DELTA) study. Current adapted clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) will be systematically searched. Their characteristics, utilization status, and adaptation procedures will be extracted, compared, and analyzed. Whether these adapted CPGs rigorously followed the instruments and steps of adaptation frameworks will also be appraised. In addition, the advantages and limitations of current adaptation methods and their suitable application situations will be analyzed. In addition, future perspectives as DELTA series and DELTA system, aiming for comprehensively evaluating current needs for guideline adaptation and developing a unified framework and related materials were proposed to improve the acceptability, applicability, and implementation of guideline adaptation in clinical practice. The DELTA series are divided into four phases: phase I in analyzing status, characteristics, and procedures and completeness of adapted CPGs; phase II in analyzing differences, heterogeneity, and implementation between adapted and original CPGs; and phase III in collecting, analyzing, and comparing all available adaptation materials. With these research bases, an international working group will be established in phase IV and will develop unified guideline adaptation materials after Delphi consensus, including adaptation frameworks, appraisal tools and checklists, registries, and databases. DISCUSSION Guideline adaptation has been advanced as an efficient way to guide local clinical practice. However, it still faces several major challenges. The proposed DELTA study, series, and system will further contribute to this emerging topic. TRIAL REGISTRATION This study has been registered by the PROSPERO international database. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=400170 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shu Wang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100070, China
| | - Yuan Zhang
- Neonatal Center, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, 100045, China
| | - Zhixuan Wen
- Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100070, China
| | - Yueming Yang
- Department of Hematology, Dalian Municipal Woman and Children's Medical Center (Group), Dalian, 116000, China
| | - Yuxuan Zhang
- Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, 100045, China
| | - Yixiong Geng
- Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, 100045, China
| | - Yali Liu
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Evidence-Based Medicine, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, 100045, China.
| | - Jianguo Zhang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100070, China.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Sarkies MN, Testa L, Best S, Moullin JC, Sullivan D, Bishop W, Kostner K, Clifton P, Hare D, Brett T, Hutchinson K, Black A, Braithwaite J, Nicholls SJ, Kangaharan N, Pang J, Abhayaratna W, Horton A, Watts GF. Barriers to and Facilitators of Implementing Guidelines for Detecting Familial Hypercholesterolaemia in Australia. Heart Lung Circ 2023; 32:1347-1353. [PMID: 37865587 DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2023.09.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2022] [Revised: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 09/06/2023] [Indexed: 10/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is a genetic condition that is a preventable cause of premature cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. High-level evidence and clinical practice guidelines support preventative care for people with FH. However, it is estimated that less than 10% of people at risk of FH have been detected using any approach across Australian health settings. The aim of this study was to identify the implementation barriers to and facilitators of the detection of FH in Australia. METHODS Four, 2-hour virtual focus groups were facilitated by implementation scientists and a clinicians as part of the 2021 Australasian FH Summit. Template analysis was used to identify themes. RESULTS There were 28 workshop attendees across four groups (n=6-8 each), yielding 13 barriers and 10 facilitators across three themes: (1) patient related, (2) provider related, and (3) system related. A "lack of care pathways" and "upskilling clinicians in identifying and diagnosing FH" were the most interconnected barriers and facilitators for the detection of FH. CONCLUSIONS The relationships between barriers and facilitators across the patient, provider, and system themes indicates that a comprehensive implementation strategy is needed to address these different levels. Future research is underway to develop a model for implementing the Australian FH guidelines into practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mitchell N Sarkies
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Luke Testa
- Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Stephanie Best
- Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Vic, Australia; Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Vic, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
| | - Joanna C Moullin
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - David Sullivan
- Department of Chemical Pathology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Warrick Bishop
- Department of Cardiology, Calvary Cardiac Centre, Calvary Health Care, Hobart, Tas, Australia
| | - Karam Kostner
- Department of Cardiology, Mater Hospital, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
| | - Peter Clifton
- Department of Endocrinology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - David Hare
- Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
| | - Tom Brett
- General Practice and Primary Health Care Research, School of Medicine, University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, WA, Australia
| | - Karen Hutchinson
- Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Andrew Black
- Department of Cardiology, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Tas, Australia
| | - Jeffrey Braithwaite
- Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Stephen J Nicholls
- Monash Cardiovascular Research Centre, Victorian Heart Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
| | | | - Jing Pang
- School of Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Walter Abhayaratna
- College of Health and Medicine, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - Ari Horton
- Monash Cardiovascular Research Centre, Victorian Heart Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic, Australia; Monash Heart and Monash Children's Hospital, Monash Health, Melbourne, Vic, Australia; Monash Genetics, Monash Health, Melbourne, Vic, Australia; Department of Genomic Medicine, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Vic, Australia; Department of Paediatrics, Monash University Clayton, Vic, Australia
| | - Gerald F Watts
- School of Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia; Department of Cardiology, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Campione E, Wampler M, Bolch CA, Krzak JJ. Barriers and facilitators to implementation of APTA's breast cancer-related lymphedema diagnosis and intervention clinical practice guidelines. J Cancer Surviv 2023:10.1007/s11764-023-01475-1. [PMID: 37853271 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-023-01475-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2023] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to identify barriers and facilitators influencing implementation of the diagnosis and intervention clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) related to the management of patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). METHODS A descriptive, cross-sectional web-based survey was conducted. Participants included physical therapists and assistants who were members of the APTA's Academy of Oncologic Physical Therapy and Lymphology Association of North America. Desriptive statisitcs were computed for all demographic and barriers and facilitators data. Individual exploratory factor analyses (EFA) were performed on survey items for both CPGs to identify themes of barriers and facilitators to implementation. RESULTS A total of 180 respondents completed the survey. 34.9% of respondents read the diagnosis CPG and 22.4% read the intervention CPG. A total of 77.8% reported that they did not have issues in changing their clinical routines and 69.5% did not have resistance working according to CPGs. The EFA resulted in 3 themes for each CPG, accounting for 46% of the variance for the diagnostic CPG and 54% of the variance for the intervention CPG. The 3 themes, clinician characteristics, patient demographics, therapist practice setting and beliefs/values, were weighted differently for each EFA. CONCLUSION Most respondents did not read either CPG, however, report a willingness to make changes to clinical practice and utilization of CPGs. For those who have attempted to implement the CPGs, this study was the first to identify the barriers and facilitators impacting the implementation of the CPGs related to the management of BCRL. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS The results will inform the development of targeted implementation strategies to improve access to and adherence to recommendations from the CPGs ultimately improving the efficiency and efficacy of care delivery to patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Campione
- Physical Therapy Program, Midwestern University, Downers Grove, IL, USA.
| | - Meredith Wampler
- Program in Physical Therapy, Oregon State University - Cascades, Bend, OR, USA
| | - Charlotte A Bolch
- Office of Research and Sponsored Programs, Midwestern University, Glendale, AZ, USA
| | - Joseph J Krzak
- Physical Therapy Program, Midwestern University, Downers Grove, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Blay JY, Piperno-Neumann S, Watson S, Dufresne A, Valentin T, Duffaud F, Toulmonde M, Italiano A, Bertucci F, Tlemsani C, Firmin N, Bompas E, Perrin C, Ropars M, Saada-Bouzid E, Dubray-Longeras P, Hervieu A, Lebbe C, Gantzer J, Chaigneau L, Fiorenza F, Rios M, Isambert N, Soibinet P, Boudou-Roquette P, Verret B, Ferron G, Ryckewaert T, Lebellec L, Brahmi M, Gouin F, Meeus P, Vaz G, Le Loarer F, Karanian M, De Pinieux G, Ducimetiere F, Chemin C, Morelle M, Le Cesne A, Penel N. Epithelioid hemangio-endothelioma (EHE) in NETSARC: The nationwide series of 267 patients over 12 years. Eur J Cancer 2023; 192:113262. [PMID: 37625241 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2023] [Revised: 07/07/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023]
Abstract
EPITHELIOID HEMANGIOENDOTHELIOMA A NATIONWIDE STUDY: Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE) is an ultrarare sarcoma whose natural history and treatment is not well defined. We report on the presentation and outcome of 267 patients with EHE in the NETSARC+ network since 2010 in France. PATIENTS AND METHODS NETSARC (netsarc.org) is a network of 26 reference sarcoma centres with specialised multidisciplinary tumour boards (MDTB), funded by the French National Cancer Institute (NCI), Institut National du Cancer (INCA). Since 2010, presentation to an MDTB and second pathological review are mandatory for sarcoma patients. Patients' characteristics are collected in a nationwide database regularly monitored with stable incidence since 2013. The characteristics of patients with EHE at diagnosis are presented as well as progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and outcome under treatment. RESULTS Two hundred and sixty-seven patients with EHE were included in the NETSARC+ database since 2010. Median age in the series was 51 (range 10-90) years, 58% were women. Median tumour size was 37 mm (4-220). Forty-eight percent, 42%, and 10% were visceral, soft parts, or bone primaries. The most frequent sites were liver (28%), lung (13%). 40% were reported to have systemic (i.e. multifocal or metastatic disease) at diagnosis. With a median follow-up of 20 months, OS and PFS rates at 24 months were 82% and 67%, with 10-year projected OS and PFS of 62% and 21% respectively. Male and M+ patients at diagnosis had a significantly worse OS, but not PFS. Local treatment was associated with a favourable survival in localised but not in patients with advanced stage at diagnosis. For 23 patients receiving medical treatment, PFS and OS were 50.2% and 33.2% at 60 months were respectively. CONCLUSIONS EHE is a frequently metastatic sarcoma at diagnosis with a unique natural history. This study shows in a nationwide series over 12 years that most patients progressed but are still alive at 10 years, both in localised and metastatic stages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Y Blay
- Department of Medical oncology, Centre Léon Bérard and Université Claude Bernard, Lyon, France.
| | - S Piperno-Neumann
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie and INSERM U830, Institut Curie Research Center, Paris, France
| | - S Watson
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie and INSERM U830, Institut Curie Research Center, Paris, France
| | - A Dufresne
- Department of Medical oncology, Centre Léon Bérard and Université Claude Bernard, Lyon, France
| | - T Valentin
- Department of Medical oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud and Institut Universitaire de Cancerologie, Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - F Duffaud
- Department of Medical oncology, La Timone University Hospital, Marseille, France
| | - M Toulmonde
- Departement of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - A Italiano
- Departement of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - F Bertucci
- Department of Medical oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - C Tlemsani
- Department of Medical oncology, Hôpital Cochin-Saint-Vincent de Paul, Paris, France
| | - N Firmin
- Department of Medical oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - E Bompas
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancerologie Ouest, Nantes, France
| | - C Perrin
- Department of Medical oncology, Eugene Marquis Comprehensive Cancer Center and CHU, Rennes, France
| | - M Ropars
- Department of Medical oncology, Eugene Marquis Comprehensive Cancer Center and CHU, Rennes, France
| | - E Saada-Bouzid
- Department of Medical oncology, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - P Dubray-Longeras
- Department of Medical oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - A Hervieu
- Department of Medical oncology, Centre Jean Perrin/ERTICa EA 4677, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - C Lebbe
- Department of Medical oncology, Oncology Unit, Saint Louis Hospital, Paris, France
| | - J Gantzer
- Department of Medicine, ICANS, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - L Chaigneau
- Department of Medical oncology, CHU Besancon, Besançon, France
| | - F Fiorenza
- Department of Medical oncology, CHU Limoges, Limoges, France
| | - M Rios
- Department of Medical oncology, Institut Cancerologie Lorraine, Centre Alexis Vautrin, Nancy, France
| | - N Isambert
- Department of Medical oncology, CHU, Poitiers, France
| | - P Soibinet
- Department of Medical oncology, Institut J Godinot Reims, Reims, France
| | - P Boudou-Roquette
- Department of Medical oncology, Hôpital Cochin-Saint-Vincent de Paul, Paris, France
| | - B Verret
- Department of Medical oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| | - G Ferron
- Department of Medical oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud and Institut Universitaire de Cancerologie, Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - T Ryckewaert
- Department of Medical oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, and Université de Lille ULR 2694, Lille, France
| | - L Lebellec
- Department of Medical oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, and Université de Lille ULR 2694, Lille, France
| | - M Brahmi
- Department of Medical oncology, Centre Léon Bérard and Université Claude Bernard, Lyon, France
| | - F Gouin
- Department of Medical oncology, Centre Léon Bérard and Université Claude Bernard, Lyon, France
| | - P Meeus
- Department of Medical oncology, Centre Léon Bérard and Université Claude Bernard, Lyon, France
| | - G Vaz
- Department of Medical oncology, Centre Léon Bérard and Université Claude Bernard, Lyon, France
| | - F Le Loarer
- Departement of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - M Karanian
- Department of Medical oncology, Centre Léon Bérard and Université Claude Bernard, Lyon, France
| | - G De Pinieux
- Department of Medical oncology, CHU Tours, Tours, France
| | - F Ducimetiere
- Department of Medical oncology, Centre Léon Bérard and Université Claude Bernard, Lyon, France
| | - C Chemin
- Department of Medical oncology, Centre Léon Bérard and Université Claude Bernard, Lyon, France
| | - M Morelle
- Department of Medical oncology, Centre Léon Bérard and Université Claude Bernard, Lyon, France
| | - A Le Cesne
- Department of Medical oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| | - N Penel
- Department of Medical oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, and Université de Lille ULR 2694, Lille, France
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Zhou P, Chen L, Wu Z, Wang E, Yan Y, Guan X, Zhai S, Yang K. The barriers and facilitators for the implementation of clinical practice guidelines in healthcare: an umbrella review of qualitative and quantitative literature. J Clin Epidemiol 2023; 162:169-181. [PMID: 37657616 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.08.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2022] [Revised: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 08/25/2023] [Indexed: 09/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To identify barriers and facilitators of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) implementation, and map those factors to the theoretical domains framework (TDF) and behavior change wheel (BCW). METHODS We conducted an umbrella review of systematic reviews. PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched. Two investigators independently screened the studies, extracted the data, and assessed the methodological quality. The identified barriers and facilitators of CPG implementation were categorized and mapped to the TDF domains and BCW components. RESULTS Thirty-seven studies were included, and 193 barriers and 140 facilitators were identified. Intrinsic aspects (35 barriers and 28 facilitators) mainly included the CPGs' impracticality, complexity, and inaccessibility. Extrinsic aspects (158 barriers and 113 facilitators) mainly included lack of resources, training, funding, or awareness of CPG content in barriers; audits and feedback; strong leadership and management support; and educating and training about CPGs in facilitators. Environmental context and resources (n = 97, 19.48%) were the most reported barriers in TDF domains. Physical opportunity and social opportunity were the most frequently mentioned models in BCW. CONCLUSION Multiple barriers and facilitators for healthcare CPG implementation are identified, with further links to TDF and BCW. Future knowledge translation strategies should be developed accordingly in specified health care settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pengxiang Zhou
- Department of Pharmacy, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China; Institute for Drug Evaluation, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China; Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Lu Chen
- Department of Pharmacy, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China; Institute for Drug Evaluation, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China; Department of Pharmacy, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Shandong, China
| | - Ziyang Wu
- Department of Pharmacy, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China; Institute for Drug Evaluation, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China
| | - Ente Wang
- Department of Pharmacy, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Yingying Yan
- Department of Pharmacy, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China; Institute for Drug Evaluation, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaodong Guan
- Department of Pharmacy Administration and Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China; International Research Center for Medicinal Administration, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Suodi Zhai
- Department of Pharmacy, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China; Institute for Drug Evaluation, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China.
| | - Kehu Yang
- Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China; Key Laboratory of Evidence-Based Medicine and Knowledge Translation of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|