1
|
Aruparayil N, Gnanaraj J, Mishra A, Bains L, Corrigan N, Brown J, Ensor T, King R, Shinkins B, Jayne D. Gasless laparoscopy in rural India-registry outcomes and evaluation of the learning curve. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:8227-8235. [PMID: 37653156 PMCID: PMC10615921 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10392-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Accepted: 08/13/2023] [Indexed: 09/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A program of gasless laparoscopy (GL) has been implemented in rural North-East India. To facilitate safe adoption, participating rural surgeons underwent rigorous training prior to independent clinical practice. An online registry was established to capture clinical data on safety and efficacy and to evaluate initial learning curves for gasless laparoscopy. METHODS Surgeons who had completed the GL training program participated in the online RedCap Registry. Patients included in the registry provided informed consent for the use of their data. Data on operative times, conversion rates, perioperative complications, length of stay, and hospital costs were collected. Fixed reference cumulative sum (CUSUM) model was used to evaluate the learning curve based on operative times and conversion rates published in the literature. RESULTS Four surgeons from three rural hospitals in North-East India participated in the registry. The data were collected over 12 months, from September 2019 to August 2020. One hundred and twenty-three participants underwent GL procedures, including 109 females (88.6%) and 14 males. GL procedures included cholecystectomy, appendicectomy, tubal ligation, ovarian cystectomy, diagnostic laparoscopy, and adhesiolysis. The mean operative time was 75.3 (42.05) minutes for all the surgeries. Conversion from GL to open surgery occurred in 11.4% of participants, with 8.9% converted to conventional laparoscopy. The main reasons for conversion were the inability to secure an operative view, lack of operating space, and adhesions. The mean length of stay was 3 (2.1) days. The complication rate was 5.7%, with one postoperative death. The CUSUM analysis for GL cholecystectomy showed a longer learning curve for operative time and few conversions. The learning curve for GL tubal ligation was relatively shorter. CONCLUSION Gasless laparoscopy can be safely implemented in the rural settings of Northeast India with appropriate training programs. Careful case selection is essential during the early stages of the surgical learning curve.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Aruparayil
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
- St. James's University Hospital, Level 7, Clinical Sciences Building, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK.
| | | | - A Mishra
- Maulana Azad Medical College, Delhi, India
| | - L Bains
- Maulana Azad Medical College, Delhi, India
| | - N Corrigan
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - J Brown
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - T Ensor
- Nuffield Centre for International Health and Development, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - R King
- Nuffield Centre for International Health and Development, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - B Shinkins
- Academic Unit of Health Economics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Division of Health Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - D Jayne
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zadey S, Leraas H, Gupta A, Biswas A, Hollier P, Vissoci JRN, Mugaga J, Ssekitoleko RT, Everitt JI, Loh AHP, Lee YT, Saterbak A, Mueller JL, Fitzgerald TN. KeyLoop retractor for global gasless laparoscopy: evaluation of safety and feasibility in a porcine model. Surg Endosc 2023:10.1007/s00464-023-10054-5. [PMID: 37074419 PMCID: PMC10338623 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10054-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2022] [Accepted: 03/26/2023] [Indexed: 04/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many surgeons in low- and middle-income countries have described performing surgery using gasless (lift) laparoscopy due to inaccessibility of carbon dioxide and reliable electricity, but the safety and feasibility of the technique has not been well documented. We describe preclinical testing of the in vivo safety and utility of KeyLoop, a laparoscopic retractor system to enable gasless laparoscopy. METHODS Experienced laparoscopic surgeons completed a series of four laparoscopic tasks in a porcine model: laparoscopic exposure, small bowel resection, intracorporeal suturing with knot tying, and cholecystectomy. For each participating surgeon, the four tasks were completed in a practice animal using KeyLoop. Surgeons then completed these tasks using standard-of-care (SOC) gas laparoscopy and KeyLoop in block randomized order to minimize learning curve effect. Vital signs, task completion time, blood loss and surgical complications were compared between SOC and KeyLoop using paired nonparametric tests. Surgeons completed a survey on use of KeyLoop compared to gas laparoscopy. Abdominal wall tissue was evaluated for injury by a blinded pathologist. RESULTS Five surgeons performed 60 tasks in 15 pigs. There were no significant differences in times to complete the tasks between KeyLoop and SOC. For all tasks, there was a learning curve with task completion times related to learning the porcine model. There were no significant differences in blood loss, vital signs or surgical complications between KeyLoop and SOC. Eleven surgeons from the United States and Singapore felt that KeyLoop could be used to safely perform several common surgical procedures. No abdominal wall tissue injury was observed for either KeyLoop or SOC. CONCLUSIONS Procedure times, blood loss, abdominal wall tissue injury and surgical complications were similar between KeyLoop and SOC gas laparoscopy for basic surgical procedures. This data supports KeyLoop as a useful tool to increase access to laparoscopy in low- and middle-income countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siddhesh Zadey
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
- Association for Socially Applicable Research (ASAR), Pune, MH, India.
| | - Harold Leraas
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Aryaman Gupta
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Pratt School of Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Arushi Biswas
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Pratt School of Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke Global Health Institute, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Joao Ricardo Nickenig Vissoci
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke Global Health Institute, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Julius Mugaga
- Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda
| | | | - Jeffrey I Everitt
- Department of Pathology, Duke University of School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Amos H P Loh
- Duke-NUS Medical School, SingHealth Duke-NUS Global Health Institute, Singapore, Singapore
| | - York Tien Lee
- Department of Paediatric Surgery, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ann Saterbak
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Pratt School of Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Jenna L Mueller
- Fischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
- Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Cancer Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Tamara N Fitzgerald
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke Global Health Institute, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Aruparayil N, Gnanaraj J, Maiti S, Chauhan M, Quyn A, Mishra A, Bains L, Mathew G, Harris C, Cundill B, Fellows A, Gordon K, Dawkins B, Shinkins B, Brown J, Jayne D. Training programme in gasless laparoscopy for rural surgeons of India (TARGET study) - Observational feasibility study. Int J Surg Open 2021; 35:None. [PMID: 34632156 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijso.2021.100399] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2021] [Revised: 08/11/2021] [Accepted: 08/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Background Benefits of laparoscopic surgery are well recognised but uptake in rural settings of low- and middle-income countries is limited due to implementation barriers. Gasless laparoscopy has been proposed as an alternative but requires a trained rural surgical workforce to upscale. This study evaluates a feasibility of implementing a structured laparoscopic training programme for rural surgeons of North-East India. Methods A 3-day training programme was held at Kolkata Medical College in March 2019. Laparoscopic knowledge and Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Skills (FLS) were assessed pre and post simulation training using multiple choice questions and the McGill Inanimate System for Training and Evaluation of Laparoscopic Skills (MISTELS), respectively. Competency with an abdominal lift device was assessed using the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) and live operating performance via the Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (GOALS) scores during live surgery. Costs of the training programme and qualitative feedback were evaluated. Results Seven rural surgeons participated. There was an improvement in knowledge acquisition (mean difference in MCQ score 5.57 (SD = 4.47)). The overall normalised mean MISTELS score for the FLS tasks improved from 386.02 (SD 110.52) pre-to 524.40 (SD 94.98) post-training (p = 0.09). Mean OSATS score was 22.4 out of 35 (SD 3.31) indicating competency with the abdominal lift device whilst a mean GOALS score of 16.42 out of 25 (SD 2.07) indicates proficiency in performing diagnostic laparoscopy using the gasless technique during live operating. Costs of the course were estimated at 354 USD for trainees and 461 USD for trainers. Conclusion Structured training programme in gasless laparoscopy improves overall knowledge and skills acquisition in laparoscopic surgery for rural surgeons of North-East India. It is feasible to deliver a training programme in gasless laparoscopy for rural surgeons. Larger studies are needed to assess the benefits for wider adoption in a similar context.
Collapse
|
4
|
Aruparayil N, Bolton W, Mishra A, Bains L, Gnanaraj J, King R, Ensor T, King N, Jayne D, Shinkins B. Clinical effectiveness of gasless laparoscopic surgery for abdominal conditions: systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2021; 35:6427-6437. [PMID: 34398284 PMCID: PMC8599349 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08677-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2021] [Accepted: 08/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In high-income countries, laparoscopic surgery is the preferred approach for many abdominal conditions. Conventional laparoscopy is a complex intervention that is challenging to adopt and implement in low resource settings. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluate the clinical effectiveness of gasless laparoscopy compared to conventional laparoscopy with CO2 pneumoperitoneum and open surgery for general surgery and gynaecological procedures. METHODS A search of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Global Health, AJOL databases and Cochrane Library was performed from inception to January 2021. All randomised (RCTs) and comparative cohort (non-RCTs) studies comparing gasless laparoscopy with open surgery or conventional laparoscopy were included. The primary outcomes were mortality, conversion rates and intraoperative complications. SECONDARY OUTCOMES operative times and length of stay. The inverse variance random-effects model was used to synthesise data. RESULTS 63 studies were included: 41 RCTs and 22 non-RCTs (3,620 patients). No procedure-related deaths were reported in the studies. For gasless vs conventional laparoscopy there was no difference in intraoperative complications for general RR 1.04 [CI 0.45-2.40] or gynaecological surgery RR 0.66 [0.14-3.13]. In the gasless laparoscopy group, the conversion rates for gynaecological surgery were high RR 11.72 [CI 2.26-60.87] when compared to conventional laparoscopy. For gasless vs open surgery, the operative times were longer for gasless surgery in general surgery RCT group MD (mean difference) 10 [CI 0.64, 19.36], but significantly shorter in the gynaecology RCT group MD - 18.74 [CI - 29.23, - 8.26]. For gasless laparoscopy vs open surgery non-RCT, the length of stay was shorter for gasless laparoscopy in general surgery MD - 3.94 [CI - 5.93, - 1.95] and gynaecology MD - 1.75 [CI - 2.64, - 0.86]. Overall GRADE assessment for RCTs and Non-RCTs was very low. CONCLUSION Gasless laparoscopy has advantages for selective general and gynaecological procedures and may have a vital role to play in low resource settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Aruparayil
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St. James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. .,NIHR Global Health Research Group, Surgical Technologies, Clinical Sciences Building, Level 7, Room 7.19, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK.
| | - W Bolton
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St. James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.,NIHR Global Health Research Group, Surgical Technologies, Clinical Sciences Building, Level 7, Room 7.19, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - A Mishra
- Maulana Azad Medical College, Delhi, India
| | - L Bains
- Maulana Azad Medical College, Delhi, India
| | | | - R King
- Nuffield Centre for International Health and Development, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.,NIHR Global Health Research Group, Surgical Technologies, Clinical Sciences Building, Level 7, Room 7.19, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - T Ensor
- Nuffield Centre for International Health and Development, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.,NIHR Global Health Research Group, Surgical Technologies, Clinical Sciences Building, Level 7, Room 7.19, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - N King
- Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - D Jayne
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St. James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.,NIHR Global Health Research Group, Surgical Technologies, Clinical Sciences Building, Level 7, Room 7.19, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - B Shinkins
- Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.,NIHR Global Health Research Group, Surgical Technologies, Clinical Sciences Building, Level 7, Room 7.19, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Farrow NE, Commander SJ, Reed CR, Mueller JL, Gupta A, Loh AHP, Sekabira J, Fitzgerald TN. Laparoscopic experience and attitudes toward a low-cost laparoscopic system among surgeons in East, Central, and Southern Africa: a survey study. Surg Endosc 2020; 35:6539-6548. [PMID: 33201314 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-08151-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2020] [Accepted: 11/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic surgery has become standard of care in high-income countries but is rarely accessible in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This study assessed experience with laparoscopy and attitudes toward a low-cost laparoscopic system among surgeons in sub-Saharan Africa. METHODS A survey assessing current laparoscopic practice and feedback on a low-cost laparoscopic system was administered to attendees of the College of Surgeons of East, Central, and Southern Africa (COSECSA) Scientific Conference between December 4 and December 6, 2019 in Kampala, Uganda. RESULTS Fifty-six surgeons from 14 countries participated. A majority were male (n = 46, 82%) general surgeons (n = 37, 66%) from tertiary/teaching hospitals (n = 36, 64%). For those with training in laparoscopy (n = 33, 59%), 22 (67%) reported less than 1 year of training and over half (n = 17, 52%) reported 1 month or less. Overall, a minority (n = 21, 38%) used laparoscopy in current practice, with 57% (n = 12) of those performing laparoscopy less than once per week. The most common laparoscopic surgeries performed were cholecystectomy (n = 15), diagnostic laparoscopy (n = 14), and appendectomy (n = 12). Few surgeons were performing more complex cases (n = 5). Barriers to laparoscopy included poor access to training equipment (n = 34, 61%), mentors (n = 33, 59%), laparoscopic equipment (n = 31, 55%), equipment maintenance (n = 25, 45%), access to consumable supplies (n = 21, 38%), and cost (n = 31, 55%). Fifty-two participants (93%) were interested in increasing their use of laparoscopy; the majority felt that a low-cost laparoscope (n = 52, 93%) and lift retractor for gasless laparoscopy (n = 46, 82%) would serve an unmet need in their practice. CONCLUSIONS While the use of laparoscopy is currently limited in COSECSA countries, there is a significant interest among surgeons to increase implementation. A low-cost, durable laparoscopic system was viewed as a potential solution to the current barriers and could improve implementation in LMICs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Norma E Farrow
- Department of Surgery, DUMC, Duke University, Box 3815, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Sarah J Commander
- Department of Surgery, DUMC, Duke University, Box 3815, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Christopher R Reed
- Department of Surgery, DUMC, Duke University, Box 3815, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Jenna L Mueller
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Aryaman Gupta
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Amos H P Loh
- Department of Paediatric Surgery, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.,Duke NUS Medical School, SingHealth Duke NUS Global Health Institute, Singapore, Singapore
| | - John Sekabira
- Pediatric Surgery Unit, Mulago Hospital, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Tamara N Fitzgerald
- Department of Surgery, DUMC, Duke University, Box 3815, Durham, NC, 27710, USA. .,Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Shoman H, Sandler S, Peters A, Farooq A, Gruendl M, Trinh S, Little J, Woods A, Bolton W, Abioye A, Ljungman D. Safety and efficiency of gasless laparoscopy: a systematic review protocol. Syst Rev 2020; 9:98. [PMID: 32354349 PMCID: PMC7193343 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-020-01365-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2019] [Accepted: 04/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gasless laparoscopy, developed in the early 1990s, was a means to minimize the clinical and financial challenges of pneumoperitoneum and general anaesthesia. It has been used in a variety of procedures such as in general surgery and gynecology procedures including diagnostic laparoscopy. There has been increasing evidence of the utility of gasless laparoscopy in resource limited settings where diagnostic imaging is not available. In addition, it may help save costs for hospitals. The aim of this study is to conduct a systematic review of the available evidence surrounding the safety and efficiency of gasless laparoscopy compared to conventional laparoscopy and open techniques and to analyze the benefits that gasless laparoscopy has for low resource setting hospitals. METHODS This protocol is developed by following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis-Protocols (PRISMA-P). The PRISMA statement guidelines and flowchart will be used to conduct the study itself. MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Central, and Global Index Medicus (WHO) will be searched and the National Institutes of Health Clinical Trials database. The articles that will be found will be pooled into Covidence article manager software where all the records will be screened for eligibility and duplicates removed. A data extraction spreadsheet will be developed based on variables of interest set a priori. Reviewers will then screen all included studies based on the eligibility criteria. The GRADE tool will be used to assess the quality of the studies and the risk of bias in all the studies will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk assessment tool. The RoB II tool will assed the risk of bias in randomized control studies and the ROBINS I will be used for the non-randomized studies. DISCUSSION This study will be a comprehensive review on all published articles found using this search strategy on the safety and efficiency of the use of gasless laparoscopy. The systematic review outcomes will include safety and efficiency of gasless laparoscopy compared to the use of conventional laparoscopy or laparotomy. TRIAL REGISTRATION The study has been registered in PROSPERO under registration number: CRD42017078338.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haitham Shoman
- Program in Global Surgery and Social Change, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Simone Sandler
- Program in Global Surgery and Social Change, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alexander Peters
- Program in Global Surgery and Social Change, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, USA
| | - Ameer Farooq
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Magdalen Gruendl
- Department of Epidemiology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Shauna Trinh
- Department of Surgery, Riverside University Health System-Medical Center, Moreno Valley, CA, USA
| | - James Little
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alex Woods
- Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA
| | - William Bolton
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | - David Ljungman
- Program in Global Surgery and Social Change, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Takeda A, Hayashi S, Imoto S, Nakamura H. Gasless single-port laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy for large uteri weighing 500g or more. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2016; 203:239-44. [PMID: 27352286 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2016] [Revised: 05/26/2016] [Accepted: 06/11/2016] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the safety and feasibility of gasless transumbilical single-port laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) for the management of large uteri weighing 500g or more. STUDY DESIGN We conducted a retrospective comparative study of women with large uteri, each undergoing gasless multi-port or single-port LAVH. Preoperatively, gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist was administered and autologous blood was donated except for cases requiring immediate surgery. Additionally, intraoperative blood salvage and donation was performed in select cases. In single-port LAVH, a wound retractor was used to make a working port through umbilical incision. After the surgical view was secured using an abdominal wall-lift device, the surgical procedures were performed using conventional laparoscopic instruments. In select cases, temporary endovascular occlusion of the bilateral internal iliac arteries was performed to reduce intraoperative hemorrhaging. RESULTS Of the 650 women managed by multi-port or single-port LAVH, 55 and 67 women each with uteri weighing 500g or more, respectively, were included. In single-port LAVH group, the median age was 47 years. Twelve women were nulliparous and 3 women with 2 cesarean deliveries each, had never had a vaginal delivery. The most frequent surgical indication was uterine myoma. In the single-port LAVH group, the surgical procedures included LAVH alone (n=36), LAVH and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (n=22), LAVH and unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (n=8), and LAVH and appendectomy (n=1). Extensive adhesiolysis was required in eight cases. The median extirpated tissue weight was 652g with a median estimated intraoperative blood loss of 450mL. A significant positive linear correlation was observed between the operative time or estimated blood loss and the extirpated uterine weigh. Although excessive bleeding exceeding 1000mL was noted in 15 cases, a transfusion of bank blood was not required by using preoperatively donated autologous blood and intraoperative autologous blood salvage and donation. Extended hospitalization was required in six cases. The median surgical duration in the single-port LAVH group was significantly longer than that in the multi-port LAVH group. CONCLUSION Gasless single-port LAVH is a feasible alternative that can yield similar major surgical outcomes as multi-port LAVH, with potential cosmetic benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akihiro Takeda
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gifu Prefectural Tajimi Hospital, Tajimi, Gifu, Japan.
| | - Shotaro Hayashi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gifu Prefectural Tajimi Hospital, Tajimi, Gifu, Japan
| | - Sanae Imoto
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gifu Prefectural Tajimi Hospital, Tajimi, Gifu, Japan
| | - Hiromi Nakamura
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gifu Prefectural Tajimi Hospital, Tajimi, Gifu, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Liao CH, Kuo IM, Fu CY, Chen CC, Yang SJ, Ouyang CH, Wang SY, Chen SW, Hsu YP, Kang SC. Gasless laparoscopic assisted surgery for abdominal trauma. Injury 2014; 45:850-4. [PMID: 24268191 DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.10.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2013] [Revised: 10/01/2013] [Accepted: 10/25/2013] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Numerous studies have described the effectiveness of laparoscopy for trauma patients. In gas-filling laparoscopic surgery, most of the disadvantages are related to a positive pressure pneumoperitoneum that compromises the cardiopulmonary function. The main advantage of gasless laparoscopic assisted surgery (GLA) is that it does not affect the haemodynamic status, which is particularly critical for trauma patients. The purpose of this study was to investigate the feasibility and safety of GLA for abdominal trauma. MATERIALS AND METHODS This was a retrospective, 1:2 matched case-control study of all trauma gasless assisted laparoscopies performed from January 2010 until January 2013 in a Level I trauma centre. In total, 965 patients with abdominal trauma were admitted. According to the abdominal trauma protocol, a total of 93 hemodynamically stable patients required the operation; we selected fifteen patients to undergo GLA and matched 30 other patients to undergo laparotomy. Demographic information, perioperative findings, injury severity score, and postoperative recovery were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS A total of fifteen patients (ten men, five women) with a mean age of 44.4, standard deviation (SD) 13.2 years underwent GLA for abdominal trauma. Eight patients had penetrating injuries, while seven had blunt injuries. Overall, 73% patients had multiple injuries. The mean time to the identified lesion was 23.1, SD 10.9min, and the mean operative time was 109.7, SD 33.5min. Most of the lesions were repaired concurrently by GLA. One conversion to laparotomy was done. The mean length of hospital stay (HLOS) was 9.1, SD 4.5 days. No mortality occurred in this series. The mean follow-up was 22.0, SD 7.9 months, and there were no significant events during this period. The mean operative times were comparable in the GLA and open surgery group (109.7, SD 33.5 vs. 131.2, SD 43.6min; p=0.076). Compared with the open surgery group, the HLOS was significantly shorter in the GLA group (9.1, SD 4.5 vs.16.3, SD 6.4 days; p=0.030). CONCLUSION GLA offers both therapeutic and diagnostic advantages for patients with abdominal trauma. GLA shares the advantages of laparoscopy and prevents the cardiopulmonary function from being compromised due to pneumoperitoneum, which is especially critical for trauma patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chien-Hung Liao
- Department of Traumatology and Emergency Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - I-Ming Kuo
- Department of Traumatology and Emergency Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Chih-Yuan Fu
- Department of Traumatology and Emergency Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Chih-Chi Chen
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Shang-Ju Yang
- Department of Traumatology and Emergency Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Chun-Hsiang Ouyang
- Department of Traumatology and Emergency Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Shang-Yu Wang
- Department of Traumatology and Emergency Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Shao-Wei Chen
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Pao Hsu
- Department of Traumatology and Emergency Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Shih-Ching Kang
- Department of Traumatology and Emergency Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hoellen F, Rody A, Ros A, Bruns A, Cirkel C, Bohlmann MK. Hybrid approach of retractor-based and conventional laparoscopy enabling minimally invasive hysterectomy in a morbidly obese patient: case report and review of the literature. MINIM INVASIV THER 2013; 23:184-7. [PMID: 24329014 DOI: 10.3109/13645706.2013.870577] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Minimally invasive hysterectomy in obese patients may be limited by laparoscopic sight on the one hand and by intraoperative complications related to reduced ventilation due to pneumoperitoneum on the other. Retractor-based laparoscopy offers an operative technique reducing anesthesia risks. We report the case of laparoscopic hysterectomy in an obese patient of short stature. Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy was performed by a hybrid approach of a retractor system exerting its effects on lifting the abdominal wall through gravity and conventional laparoscopy, thus bypassing the adverse effects of pneumoperitoneum on ventilation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Friederike Hoellen
- Department of Gynecology and Ostetrics, University Hospital Schleswig Holstein , Campus Luebeck, Luebeck , Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Song MJ, Lee SJ, Yoo SH, Seo YH, Yoon JH. Single port gasless laparoscopy-assisted mini-laparotomic ovarian resection (SP-GLAMOR): reasonable treatment for large cystic ovarian tumors with suspicion of malignancy. Gynecol Oncol 2013; 132:119-24. [PMID: 24125748 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2013] [Revised: 10/01/2013] [Accepted: 10/04/2013] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Recent improvements to both optical and laparoscopic instruments have enabled the use of laparoscopic surgery for gynecological procedures as opposed to open abdominal surgery. However, laparoscopic surgery has several potential limitations, including tumor rupture, spillage, incomplete resection of lesions, and trocar insertion site metastasis in surgeries involving large ovarian masses with suspicion of malignancy. Here, we report a case series of large ovarian cystic tumors that were successfully removed by single port gasless laparoscopy assisted mini-laparotomic ovarian resection (SP-GLAMOR), the limitations of which were successfully addressed. METHODS We reviewed the medical records of 31 women who visited St. Vincent Hospital from April 2006 until April 2011 and were diagnosed with a large cystic ovarian mass with suspicion of malignancy based on imaging studies and tumor markers. After diagnosis, all of the women underwent SP-GLAMOR. RESULTS The median maximal diameter of cysts, median incision size, median surgical duration and median volume of blood loss were 20 cm (range 10.7-45 cm), 3 cm (range 2.5-4 cm), 100 min (range 45-270 min) and 100mL (range 30-500 mL), respectively. Four cases were diagnosed as malignant disease on frozen sections obtained during the operation, and were converted to open abdominal surgery. No major complications were observed. The four patients diagnosed with malignant disease also underwent adjuvant chemotherapy. All patients were followed up to the time of this report. CONCLUSIONS The results of our study suggest that the SP-GLAMOR procedure is feasible, with potentially decreased perioperative morbidity and blood loss, faster recovery and better cosmetic results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Min Jong Song
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sung Jong Lee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sie Hyeon Yoo
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University, Cheonan, Republic of Korea
| | - Yong Han Seo
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University, Cheonan, Republic of Korea
| | - Joo Hee Yoon
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Sesti F, Pietropolli A, Sesti FF, Piccione E. Gasless laparoscopic surgery during pregnancy: evaluation of its role and usefulness. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2013; 170:8-12. [PMID: 23746633 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.04.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2011] [Revised: 04/10/2013] [Accepted: 04/30/2013] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
The minimally invasive laparoscopic approach in the surgical treatment of diseases during pregnancy has become progressively more accepted and applied. In an attempt to overcome the potential adverse effects of pneumoperitoneum on the fetus, gasless laparoscopic surgery (GLS) has been developed. This article reviews the evidence available for the role and effectiveness of GLS in pregnancy. A computerized literature search was conducted on Medline, Science Citation Index, Current Contents, Embase, and PubMed databases for English language publications from the first report of GLS in pregnancy in 1995 to June 2012. Eleven case reports or retrospective series were identified. A total of 44 pregnant women underwent GLS for various surgical indications. In all cases, the procedures were carried out without complication, and the women were discharged from hospital with a continuing pregnancy. GLS in pregnancy has comparable outcomes to conventional CO2 laparoscopy, but it is associated with some advantages. Hypercarbia and increased intraperitoneal pressure due to CO2 insufflation are avoided. The use of high-pressure continuous suction may prevent the problems that are potentially associated with intra-abdominal smoke generated by electrosurgery, which can increase the risk of fetal exposure to elevated levels of toxic gases. Because this procedure may be performed under regional anesthesia, avoiding general anesthesia, there is a minimal transplacental passage of anesthetic drugs to the fetus. The surgeon must be expert in advanced laparoscopic procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Sesti
- Academic Department of Biomedicine & Prevention and Clinical Department of Surgery, Section of Gynecology, Tor Vergata University Hospital, Rome, Italy.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|