Human leukocyte antigen immunization in transfusion-dependent Moroccan patients with beta-thalassemia major: prevalence and risk factors

INTRODUCTION

Beta-thalassemia major patients need a regular blood transfusion to have an initial normal growth. However, these patients have an increased risk of developing alloantibodies. Our main goal was to study HLA alloimmunization in Moroccan Beta-thalassemia patients by confronting it with transfusion and demographic criteria, exploring the involvement of HLA typing profile in the development of HLA antibodies and in turn determining risk factors for their development.

METHODS

The study consisted of 53 Moroccan pediatric patients with Beta-thalassemia major. Screening for HLA alloantibodies was performed using Luminex technology Whereas HLA genotyping was done with sequence-specific primers (PCR-SSP).

RESULTS

In this study, 50.9% of patients have been identified as positive for HLA antibodies, with 59.3% having both HLA Class I and Class II antibodies. A significant increase frequency of DRB1*11 allele was revealed in non-immunized patients (34.6% vs. 0%, p = 0.001). Our results also revealed that the majority of our HLA immunized patients were women (72.4% vs. 27.6%, p = 0.001), and transfused with more than 300 units of RBC units (66.7% vs. 33.3%, p = 0.02). There were statistically significant differences when comparing these frequencies.

CONCLUSIONS

This paper revealed that the transfusion dependent Beta-thalassemia major patients are exposed to risk of developing HLA antibodies following transfusions with leukoreduced RBC units. The HLA DRB1*11 was a protective factor against HLA alloimmunization in our beta-thalassemia major patients.

Transfusions in Aplastic Anemia Patients Cause HLA Alloimmunization: Comparisons of Current and Past Cohorts Demonstrate Progress

Transfusions are the mainstay of supportive therapy in patients with aplastic anemia (AA) and may lead to anti- HLA alloimmunization, thereby also increasing the risk for donor-specific antibodies in the setting of HLA-mismatched transplantation. Historically, AA patients were thought to be at particularly high risk for HLA alloimmunization. In past decades, blood product manufacturing (leukoreduction) and HLA antibody testing have improved significantly by single antigen bead (SAB) technology. It is currently unknown how those developments have impacted HLA alloimmunization and treatment outcome in patients with AA. We retrospectively investigated 54 AA patients treated by immunosuppressive therapy or allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation after the introduction of the SAB assay at our center. We compared the HLA antibody results to a historical AA cohort (n = 26), treated before introduction of leukoreduced blood products from 1975 to 1995. HLA alloimmunization was detected in 43 of 54 (80%) recently treated patients. Past pregnancy, female gender, disease severity, age, and a history of other transfusions were significantly associated with a larger number or higher intensity (mean fluorescence intensity) of HLA antibodies. Treatment outcome including bleeding episodes, response to treatment, engraftment, graft-versus-host disease, and overall survival was not associated with HLA alloimmunization. In the historical cohort a significantly higher number of HLA antibodies (P < .01) with a higher mean fluorescent intensity (P < .01) was observed. HLA alloimmunization remains frequent in AA tested by current techniques, but it has significantly decreased since prior decades and does not affect treatment outcome. © 2021 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Practice patterns and clinical outcomes of platelet alloimmunization in a comprehensive cancer center

BACKGROUND

Platelet transfusion refractoriness (PTR) secondary to human leukocyte antigen (HLA) alloimmunization is a challenge in the treatment of hematology-oncologypatients and increases the risk of morbidity and mortality from bleeding events. Guidelines for treating PTR have not been clearly described in literature. We aim to describe the practice patterns for the management of PTR secondary to HLA alloimmunization, and to assess the mortality, thrombosis and bleeding-related clinical outcomes at 30 days from diagnosis.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 51 cases of PTR secondary to HLA alloimmunization were analyzed.

RESULTS

The majority of patients (98 %) had a diagnosis of hematological malignancy of which 88.2 % were undergoing active chemotherapy. Clinically relevant bleeding, by ISTH criteria, was observed in 33.3 %; hemorrhagic shock was diagnosed in 7%. The rate of bleeding-related mortality was estimated at 7.8 %. The use of antifibrinolytics and plasma products (including intravenous immunoglobulin) was more common in cases with major versus non-major bleeding. Grade A or B1U HLA matched products were available in less than half of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

There is heterogeneity in the management of the bleeding risk and bleeding events during PTR, with antifibrinolytics more commonly used in patients who suffered severe bleeding. Grade A and B1U HLA-matched platelets are not always readily available, and HLA-typing and HLA-antibody testing are not always performed prior to PTR. Prospective randomized control trials may help to determine the safety and efficacy of antifibrinolytics and other supportive measures in the management of PTR.

Platelets treated with pathogen reduction technology: current status and future direction

Allogeneic platelets collected for transfusion treated with pathogen reduction technology (PRT), which has been available in some countries for more than a decade, are now increasingly available in the United States (US). The implementation of PRT-treated platelets, also known as pathogen-reduced platelets (PRPs), has been spurred by the need to further decrease the risk of sepsis associated with bacterial contamination coupled with the potential of this technology to reduce the risk of infections due to already recognized, new, and emerging infectious agents. This article will review available PRP products, examine their benefits, highlight unresolved questions surrounding this technology, and summarize pivotal research studies that have compared transfusion outcomes (largely in adult patients) for PRPs with non-PRT-treated conventional platelets (CPs). In addition, studies describing the use of PRPs in pediatric patients and work done on the association between PRPs and HLA alloimmunization are discussed. As new data emerge, it is critical to re-evaluate the risks and benefits of existing PRPs and newer technologies and reassess the financial implications of adopting PRPs to guide our decision-making process for the implementation of transfusing PRPs.

Rituximab, plasma exchange and intravenous immunoglobulins as a new treatment strategy for severe HLA alloimmune platelet refractoriness

Platelet refractoriness (PR) due to HLA alloimmunization is a common and serious complication of patients receiving long-term packed red blood cell and platelet transfusions. Although most alloimmunized patients will respond to HLA-matched platelets, 20-50% of patients will remain refractory even to matched platelets. Several measures have been reported to overcome this complication, such as intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG), plasma exchange (PE), protein A column therapy, or rituximab. We report a woman with acute myeloid leukemia secondary to myelodysplastic syndrome who was diagnosed with PR because of HLA alloimmunization. Due to difficulties in finding HLA-compatible platelet donors by cross-reactive groups in our panel of HLA-typed platelet donors, the patient received treatment with rituximab, PEs and IVIG. With this treatment strategy, the presence of HLA antibodies decreased from a panel-reactive antibody (PRA) of 89-0%. This allowed the performance of hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation with random donor platelets. Rituximab, PE, and IVIG may be an option to overcome severe PR due to poly-specific HLA alloimmunization.