Two cases of gastric cancer with elevated serum levels of KL-6

BACKGROUND

The serum level of Krebs von den Lungen-6 (sKL-6) is a biomarker of interstitial pneumonia and has been reported to be elevated in patients with cancers. However, there have been few cases of gastric cancer (GC) with elevated sKL-6 that were treated by chemotherapy. We herein report two cases of GC with elevated sKL-6 that were treated with oxaliplatin plus S-1 (SOX) chemotherapy and discussed the resulting changes in sKL-6.

CASE PRESENTATION

The first patient was a 79-year-old woman complaining of loss of appetite. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) showed a type-3 tumor in the gastric antrum and biopsy specimens showed adenocarcinoma. Computed tomography (CT) showed multiple liver metastases. sKL-6 was elevated to 1,292 U/ml, but a CT revealed no obvious lesions of the lungs, including interstitial pneumonia. The tumor was diagnosed as GC with liver metastases and elevated sKL-6. Respiratory function data were normal. SOX therapy using oxaliplatin and S-1 was performed. After 3 courses of SOX therapy, CT showed reductions of the liver metastases as well as the primary tumor, and sKL-6 was decreased to 201 U/ml. After the 44 courses, sKL-6 was slightly elevated. Chest CT showed interstitial pneumonia and chemotherapy was stopped. The patient is still alive without any metastasis 72 months later. The second patient was a 69-year-old woman complaining of upper abdominal pain. EGD revealed a type-3 tumor in the gastric antrum showing adenocarcinoma with HER2-positive pathology. CT showed multiple node metastases around the abdominal aorta. sKL-6 was elevated to 2,239 U/ml, but a respiratory function test showed no abnormalities, and CT of the lungs showed no obvious lesions. The tumor was diagnosed as GC with distant node metastases and elevated sKL-6. The patient received SOX therapy combined with trastuzumab. After 6 courses, the size of the primary tumor and multiple node metastases were reduced, and sKL-6 was decreased to 284 U/ml.

CONCLUSIONS

These two cases suggest that sKL-6 may be important not only as an indicator of interstitial pneumonia in chemotherapeutic courses, but also as a tumor marker in GC patients with multiple metastases.

Perioperative versus adjuvant S-1 plus oxaliplatin chemotherapy for stage II/III resectable gastric cancer (RESONANCE): a randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial

Evidence from Europe shows that perioperative chemotherapy may be beneficial for the treatment of locally advanced gastric cancer, but reliable and robust data is lacking. To rectify this, the phase 3 RESONANCE trial investigated the efficacy and safety of S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) as a perioperative chemotherapy regimen for gastric cancer. This randomized, open-label trial enrolled patients from 19 medical centers with stage II/III resectable gastric cancer who were centrally randomly assigned to either perioperative chemotherapy (PC) arm or adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) arm. Patients in the PC arm received two to four cycles of SOX followed by surgery and four to six cycles of SOX. Patients in the AC arm received upfront surgery and eight cycles of SOX. 386 patients in each group were enrolled and 756 (382 in PC and 374 in AC) were included in the mITT population. The three-year DFS rate was 61.7% in the PC arm and 53.8% in the AC arm (log-rank p = 0.019). The R0 resection rate in the PC arm was significantly higher than that in the AC arm (94.9% vs. 83.7%, p < 0.0001). There was no difference between two arms in surgical outcomes or postoperative complications. Safety-related data were like the known safety profile. In conclusion, from a clinical perspective, this trial indicated a trend towards higher three-year disease-free survival rate with perioperative SOX in stage II/III resectable gastric cancer with well-tolerated toxicity compared to adjuvant SOX, which might provide a theoretical basis for applying perioperative SOX in advanced gastric cancer patients. (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01583361).

Preoperative low skeletal muscle volume can result in insufficient administration of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy in older patients with stage II/III gastric cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Older patients are more likely to encounter difficulties receiving chemotherapy, but the factors involved in the continuation of chemotherapy in these patients remain unclear. We investigated the importance of muscle mass as a factor involved in delivering a sufficient dose of postoperative S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) to older patients with gastric cancer.

METHODS

The subjects of this study were 79 patients aged ≥ 65 years with stage II/III gastric adenocarcinoma, who underwent curative gastrectomy and received S-1 ACT.

RESULTS

The overall median relative dose intensity (RDI) was 75.0% (18.8-93.5%). Patients were divided into two groups for receiver operating characteristic analysis according to the cutoff value. Significantly more patients in the high skeletal muscle index (SMI) group achieved > 62% RDI of S-1 ACT (p = 0.03). Conversely, more patients in the low SMI group suffered from S-1-induced nausea (p = 0.03) and discontinued chemotherapy because of adverse events (p = 0.02). Multivariate analysis identified low SMI as an independent factor for insufficient S-1 dose delivery (p = 0.03, hazard ratio = 2.87).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative SMI is an indicator of the low-dose intensity of S-1 ACT in older patients following curative gastrectomy.

Efficacy of nab‑paclitaxel vs. Gemcitabine in combination with S‑1 for advanced pancreatic cancer: A multicenter phase II randomized trial

Patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (PC) need a cost-effective treatment regimen. The present study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of nab-paclitaxel plus S-1 (AS) and gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS) regimens in patients with chemotherapy-naïve advanced PC. In this open-label, multicenter, randomized study named AvGmPC, eligible patients with chemotherapy-naïve advanced PC were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive AS (125 mg/m2 nab-paclitaxel, days 1 and 8; 80-120 mg S-1, days 1-14) or GS (1,000 mg/m2 gemcitabine, days 1 and 8; 80-120 mg S-1, days 1-14). The treatment was administered every 3 weeks until intolerable toxicity or disease progression occurred. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Between December 2018 and March 2022, 101 of 106 randomized patients were treated and evaluated for analysis (AS, n=49; GS, n=52). As of the data cutoff, the median follow-up time was 11.37 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 9.31-13.24]. The median PFS was 7.16 months (95% CI, 5.19-12.32) for patients treated with AS and 6.41 months (95% CI, 3.72-8.84) for patients treated with GS (HR=0.78; 95% CI, 0.51-1.21; P=0.264). The AS regimen showed a slightly improved overall survival (OS; 13.27 vs. 10.64 months) and a significantly improved ORR (44.90 vs. 15.38%; P=0.001) compared with the GS regimen. In the subgroup analyses, PFS and OS benefits were observed in patients treated with the AS regimen who had KRAS gene mutations and high C-reactive protein (CRP) levels (≥5 mg/l). The most common grade ≥3 adverse events were neutropenia, anemia and alopecia in the two groups. Thrombocytopenia occurred more frequently in the GS group than in the AS group. While the study did not meet the primary endpoint, the response benefit observed for AS may be suggestive of meaningful clinical activity in this population. In particular, promising survival benefits were observed in the subsets of patients with KRAS gene mutations and high CRP levels, which is encouraging and warrants further investigation. This trial was retrospectively registered as ChiCTR1900024588 on July 18, 2019.

Completion of adjuvant S-1 chemotherapy after surgical resection for biliary tract cancer: A single center experience

BACKGROUNDS

A recent randomized control trial (JCOG1202; ASCOT trial) demonstrated the efficacy of adjuvant S-1 chemotherapy (ASC) for biliary tract cancer (BTC) after surgical resection; however, the significance of the completion of ASC in the real-world setting remains unknown.

METHODS

Data of consecutive patients who underwent surgical resection for biliary tract cancer (BTC) from 2011 to 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Of these, patients who underwent ASC were enrolled in this study. Patients were divided into two groups according to whether ASC was completed: the completion group and the non-completion group. Clinicopathological features and survival outcomes were assessed.

RESULTS

Of the 223 patients with BTC who underwent surgical resection, 75 patients who underwent ASC were included for analysis. Among them, 48 (64.0 %) completed the intended ASC course, while 27 cases (36.0 %) discontinued the treatment. The most common reason for the discontinuation was adverse event (n = 16, 59.3 %), followed by disease recurrence (n = 9, 33.3 %). Patients in the completion group showed significantly better overall survival (OS) (p < 0.001) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) (p < 0.001) compared to the non-completion group. Further, after excluding the patients in the non-completion group who discontinued ASC due to disease recurrence, the significance of ASC completion was retained for both OS and RFS.

CONCLUSION

The completion of ASC was associated with improved prognosis in patients with BTC after surgical resection. The achievement of ASC should be the goal after surgical resection, while further study may be warranted regarding the resistance of ASC.

Effect of Liver Dysfunction on S-1 Therapy Induced Adverse Effects: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND/AIM

Renal dysfunction necessitates S-1 dose reduction. However, decreased dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) activity may lead to adverse events due to 5-FU. The guidelines provided by pharmaceutical companies state that total bilirubin (T-Bil) should be ≤upper limit of normal (ULN)×1.5 as a reference value for safely taking S-1. Nevertheless, the relationship between the degree of liver dysfunction and S-1 dose reduction has not been clearly established.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study focused on patients who received S-1 monotherapy for various types of cancer. The primary outcome was defined as the variation between blood sampling results on the test day and the subsequent test. The variation data were categorized based on the difference in T-Bil: Low T-Bil group (≤2.25) and High T-Bil group (>2.25).

RESULTS

The number of patients that underwent S-1 monotherapy was 883 and the running number was 7,511; Low T-Bil group included 7,245 and High T-Bil group included 266. Examination of the effect of the T-Bil Group on clinical outcomes revealed a correlation with red blood cell (RBC) count, platelet (PLT) count, and T-Bil level. When the impact of the interaction between the T-Bil Group and any of the clinical outcomes, such as the RBC count, PLT count, and T-Bil level, was determined, each outcome showed a significant decrease in the High T-Bil group compared with the Low T-Bil group.

CONCLUSION

S-1 administration in patients with liver dysfunction accompanied by elevated T-Bil levels may cause thrombocytopenia.

C-Reactive Protein-to-Albumin Ratio to Predict Tolerability of S-1 as an Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Pancreatic Cancer

Adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) with S-1 after radical surgery for resectable pancreatic cancer (PC) has shown a significant survival advantage over surgery alone. Consequently, ensuring that patients receive a consistent, uninterrupted S-1 regimen is of paramount importance. This study aimed to investigate whether the C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio (CAR) could predict S-1 AC completion in PC patients without dropout due to adverse events (AEs). We retrospectively enrolled 95 patients who underwent radical pancreatectomy and S-1 AC for PC between January 2010 and December 2022. A statistical analysis was conducted to explore the correlation of predictive markers with S-1 completion, defined as continuous oral administration for 6 months. Among the 95 enrolled patients, 66 (69.5%) completed S-1, and 29 (30.5%) failed. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed 0.05 as the optimal CAR threshold to predict S-1 completion. Univariate and multivariate analyses further validated that a CAR ≥ 0.05 was independently correlated with S-1 completion (p < 0.001 and p = 0.006, respectively). Furthermore, a significant association was established between a higher CAR at initiation of oral administration and acceptable recurrence-free and overall survival (p = 0.003 and p < 0.001, respectively). CAR ≥ 0.05 serves as a predictive marker for difficulty in completing S-1 treatment as AC for PC due to AEs.

Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Literature Review and Our Experience of NAC-GS

In addition to established evidence of the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), evidence of the effects of neoadjuvant treatments (NATs), including chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy, has also been accumulating. Recent results from prospective studies and meta-analyses suggest that NATs may be beneficial not only for borderline resectable PDAC, but also for resectable PDAC, by increasing the likelihood of successful R0 resection, decreasing the likelihood of the development of lymph node metastasis, and improving recurrence-free and overall survival. In addition, response to NAT may be informative for predicting the clinical course after preoperative NAT followed by surgery; in this way, the postoperative treatment strategy can be revised based on the effect of NAT and the post-neoadjuvant therapy/surgery histopathological findings. On the other hand, the response to NAT and AC is also influenced by the tumor biology and the patient's immune/nutritional status; therefore, planning of the treatment strategy and meticulous management of NAT, surgery, and AC is required on a patient-by-patient basis. Our experience of using gemcitabine plus S-1 showed that this NAT regimen achieved tumor shrinkage and decreased the levels of tumor markers but failed to provide a survival benefit. Our results also suggested that response/adverse events to NAT may be predictive of the efficacy of AC, as well as survival outcomes.

Multicenter randomized phase II study on S-1 and oxaliplatin therapy as an adjuvant after hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases (YCOG1001)

PURPOSE

The high recurrence rate of colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRCLM) after surgery remains a crucial problem. However, adjuvant chemotherapy after hepatectomy for CRCLM has not yet been established. This study evaluated the efficacy of adjuvant therapy with S-1 and oxaliplatin (SOX).

METHODS

In a multicenter, randomized, phase II study, patients undergoing curative resection of CRCLM were randomly enrolled in a 1:1 ratio to either the low- or high-dose group. S-1 and oxaliplatin were administered from days 1 to 14 of a 3-week cycle as a 2-h infusion every 3 weeks. The dose of S-1 was fixed at 80 mg/m2. The doses in the low- and high-dose oxaliplatin groups were 100 mg/m2 (low-dose group) and 130 mg/m2 (high-dose group), respectively. This treatment was repeated eight times. The primary endpoint was the rate of discontinuation owing to toxicity. The secondary endpoints were the relapse-free survival (RFS) and frequency of adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

Between August 2010 and March 2015, 44 patients (low-dose group: 31 patients and high-dose group: 13 patients) were enrolled in the study. Of these, one patient was excluded from the efficacy analysis. In the high-dose group, five of nine patients were unable to continue the study due to toxicity in February 2013. At that time, recruitment to the high-dose group was stopped from the protocol. The relative dose intensity (RDI) for S-1 in the low- and high-dose groups were 49.8 and 48.7% (p = 0.712), and that for oxaliplatin was 75.9 and 73.0% (p = 0.528), respectively. The rates of discontinuation due to toxicity were 60 and 53.8% in the low- and high-dose groups, respectively, with no marked difference noted between the groups (p = 0.747). The frequency of grade ≥ 3 common adverse events was neutropenia (23.3%/23.1%), diarrhea (13.3%/15.4%), and peripheral sensory neuropathy (6.7%/7.7%). The disease-free survival (DFS) at 3 years was 52.9% in the low-dose group, which was not significantly different from that in the high-dose group (46.2%; p = 0.705).

CONCLUSIONS

SOX regimens as adjuvant therapy after hepatectomy for CRCLM had high rates of discontinuation due to toxicity in both groups. In particular, the RDI of S-1 was < 50%. Therefore, the SOX regimen is not recommended as adjuvant chemotherapy after hepatectomy for CRCLM.

Efficacy and safety of second-line therapy by S-1 combined with sintilimab and anlotinib in pancreatic cancer patients with liver metastasis: a single-arm, phase II clinical trial

Background

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma carries a grim prognosis, and there are few recognized effective second-line treatment strategies. We attempted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a combination of S-1, sintilimab, and anlotinib as a second-line treatment in pancreatic cancer patients with liver metastasis.

Methods

Pancreatic cancer patients with liver metastases were recruited. S-1 was administered orally at 25 mg/m2 bid, anlotinib was administered orally at 12 mg qd from day 1 to day 14, and sintilimab was administered intravenously at 200 mg on day 1. This method was repeated every 21 days, and the therapeutic effect was evaluated every 3 cycles. The primary outcome was the objective response rate (ORR).

Results

Overall, 23 patients were enrolled in this study of whom 19 patients had objective efficacy evaluation. The ORR was 10.5% (95% CI 0.4%-25.7%) in the evaluable population. The progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.53 (95% CI 2.50-7.50) months, and the overall survival (mOS) was 8.53 (95% CI 4.97-14.20) months. Grade 3 adverse events were 26.1%, and no grade 4 or above adverse events occurred. High-throughput sequencing was performed on the tumor tissues of 16 patients; patients with HRD-H (n = 10) had shorter PFS than those with HRD-L (n = 6) (2.43 vs. 5.45 months; P = 0.043), but there was no significant difference in OS between the two groups (4.43 vs. 9.35 months; P = 0.11).

Conclusions

This study suggests the advantage of S-1 combined with sintilimab and anlotinib in extending OS as a second-line therapy in pancreatic cancer patients with liver metastasis. Clinical Trial Registration: ChiCTR2000030659.

Tertiary lymphoid structures in tongue cancer: Association with clinicopathological parameters, preoperative S-1 chemotherapy response, and prognosis

BACKGROUND

Tertiary lymphoid structures (TLSs) are observed in cancer-invasive sites of various organs, and show evidence of tumor-specific B and/or T cells, suggesting an active humoral antitumor response. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between TLSs and prognosis in patients with tongue squamous cell carcinoma (TSCC) after preoperative S-1 chemotherapy.

METHODS

Among 196 TSCC cases, 111 patients who received preoperative S-1 chemotherapy were compared to 85 patients who did not receive chemotherapy. We investigated the incidence of TLSs in both preoperative biopsy and resected specimens.

RESULTS

TLSs were present in 24 (12%) biopsy specimens and 31 (16%) resected specimens. TLSs were associated with clinicopathologically advanced cases and positivity for lymphatic invasion. None of the cases with pStage 0 (i.e., noninvasive cancer) showed TLSs. In preoperative S-1 chemotherapy cases, TLSs were significantly more common in those treated with S-1 for more than 21 days and in those with treatment effects 0, Ia, and Ib. TLSs may not be a favorable prognostic factor by themselves but maybe a prognostic factor when combined with preoperative S-1 treatment.

CONCLUSION

The presence of TLSs was suggested to be a factor indicating a favorable prognosis when considering the indication for preoperative S-1 chemotherapy. The synergistic effect of S-1 by activating antitumor immunity may be associated with a better prognosis in TSCC patients with TLSs.

Efficacy and safety of camrelizumab combined with oxaliplatin and S-1 as neoadjuvant treatment in locally advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer: A phase II, single-arm study

PURPOSE

In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of camrelizumab combined with oxaliplatin plus S-1 in patients with resectable gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer.

METHODS

In this single-arm, phase II clinical trial, patients with locally advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma were enrolled to receive three cycles of neoadjuvant camrelizumab and oxaliplatin plus S-1 every 3 weeks, followed by surgical resection and adjuvant therapy with the same regimen. The primary endpoint was pathological complete response (pCR) (ypT0) rate and secondary endpoints were R0 resection rate, total pCR (tpCR, ypT0N0) rate, major pathological response (MPR) rate, downstaging, objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.

RESULTS

Between September, 2020 and January, 2022, a total of 29 patients were enrolled in the present study, all of whom completed neoadjuvant therapy and underwent surgery. Three (10.3%) (95% CI: 2.2-27.4) patients achieved pCR as well as tpCR, 20 (69.0%) patients had MPR and 28 (96.6%) patients achieved R0 resection. Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) of any grade were observed in 24 (82.8%) patients. Immune-related adverse events of any grade were reported in 13 (44.8%) patients, whereas no grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred.

CONCLUSION

The neoadjuvant therapy with camrelizumab in combination with oxaliplatin and S-1 showed a modest pCR rate, and favorable MPR rate and safety profile in patients with gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer.

Long-Term Follow-up Data of a Multi-Institutional Phase-2 Study of S-1/oxaliplatin and Bevacizumab Therapy in Patients with Advanced Colorectal Cancer: The HiSCO-02 Study

Oral fluoropyrimidines (FUs) have certain advantages over intravenous FUs, such as longer intervals between outpatient visits, no requirement for central venous port (CVP) implantation, and lower incidence of neutropenia. We previously reported the efficacy of S-1/oxaliplatin (SOX) with bevacizumab therapy as a first-line treatment for advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) in a prospective phase-II multi-institutional clinical trial (HiSCO-02 study). However, our prognostic data at the time lacked a sufficient observation period. Herein, we analyze the longer-term follow-up data, focusing on the status of eventual CVP implantation via an open-label, non-randomized, multicenter study. This study enrolled 55 patients (mean age, 64 years), of whom 43 died (41 of primary cancer). The median overall survival was 22.7 months (95% CI: 20.1-34.7 months). Post-treatment regimens after failure of first-line treatment were initiated in 43 patients; CPT11-based regimens were selected in most cases, and other oral FU combinations in nine. CVP was implanted in 35 patients prior to first-line treatment; eleven of the remaining 20 patients did not require CVP implantation. In conclusion, we report here the final prognostic update of the Phase II clinical trial examining the efficacy of SOX plus bevacizumab therapy, the results of which confirm the clinical efficacy of this regimen.

Phase II study of S-1 plus docetaxel as first-line treatment for older patients with advanced gastric cancer (OGSG 0902)

BACKGROUND

Although there is insufficient evidence for the treatment of older patients with advanced gastric cancer, fluorouracil combined with platinum chemotherapy has been recognized as a standard first-line treatment for such populations in Japan despite the lack of efficacy and toxicity data.

METHODS

Patients aged 75 years or older with advanced gastric cancer were enrolled. S-1 plus docetaxel (docetaxel: 40 mg/m2, day 1; S-1: 80 mg/m2, days 1-14; q21 days) was repeated every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was overall response rate. Secondary endpoints were safety, progression-free survival, time to treatment failure, and overall survival. The sample size was calculated as 30 under the hypothesis of an expected response rate of 40% and a threshold response rate of 20%, at a power of 90% and a two-sided alpha value of 5%.

RESULTS

From February 2010 to January 2015, 31 patients were enrolled and assessed for efficacy and toxicity. The response rate was 45.2% (95% CI 27.3%-64.0%; p = 0.001) and it exceeded the expected response rate set at 40%. Median progression-free survival was 5.8 months, the 1-year survival rate was 58.1%, and the median survival time was 16.1 months. The major grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia (58%), febrile neutropenia (13%), anemia (10%), anorexia (10%), and fatigue (6%).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings indicate that S-1 plus docetaxel as first-line treatment for older patients is feasible and that it has promising efficacy against advanced gastric cancer.

Favorable efficacy of S-1 treatment for locoregionally advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in the head and neck region

Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma is usually treated with surgery; however, locoregionally advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma can be difficult to resect. Although recent guidelines from Western countries recommend using anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) antibodies, including cemiplimab and pembrolizumab, there are no approved anti-PD-1 antibodies for locoregional cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in Asian countries. S-1 is an oral drug with a low incidence of severe toxicity that can be used for head and neck cancers, including head and neck locoregional cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, in Japan. We retrospectively evaluated patients with head and neck locoregional cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma treated with S-1 at two Japanese institutions (2008-2022). The initial dosage was determined by the body surface area (<1.25 m2 : 80 mg/day, 1.25-1.5 m2 : 100 mg/day, ≥1.5 m2: 120 mg/day) for 28 consecutive days. The outcome measures were objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Fourteen patients were included. The ORR was 78%, and the complete response (CR) rate was 64.3%. The median PFS and OS were not reached (NR) (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.9 months-NR) and NR (95% CI, 13.8 months-NR), respectively. The 12-month PFS and OS rates were 51% and 85%, respectively. Six of the nine patients who achieved CR showed no recurrence during the follow-up period (median follow-up, 24.7 months). After CR, three patients experienced recurrence. Among these, two resumed S-1 treatment and subsequently underwent salvage surgery, resulting in a sustained absence of recurrence. One patient developed lung metastasis and died, although S-1 therapy was resumed. Only one patient (7.1%) developed grade 3 anemia. S-1 showed favorable efficacy and low toxicity in patients with head and neck locoregionally advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. S-1 may be a good alternative to the anti-PD-1 antibody for treating head and neck locoregionally advanced squamous cell carcinoma.

Investigation of Molecular Mechanisms of S-1, Docetaxel and Cisplatin in Gastric Cancer with a History of Helicobacter Pylori Infection

Gastric cancer rates and fatality rates have not decreased. Gastric cancer treatment has historically included surgery (both endoscopic and open), chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy. One of the aggravating carriers of this cancer is Helicobacter pylori infection. Various drug combinations are used to treat gastric cancer. However, examining the molecular function of these drugs, depending on whether or not there is a history of Helicobacter pylori infection, can be a better help in the treatment of these patients. This study was designed as bioinformatics. Various datasets such as patients with gastric cancer, with and without a history of H. pylori, and chemotherapy drugs cisplatin, docetaxel, and S-1 were selected. Using Venn diagrams, the similarities between gene expression profiles were assessed and isolated. Then, selected the signal pathways, ontology of candidate genes and proteins. Then, in clinical databases, we confirmed the candidate genes and proteins. The association between gastric cancer patients with and without a history of H. pylori with chemotherapy drugs was investigated. The pathways of cellular aging, apoptosis, MAPK, and TGFβ were clearly seen. After a closer look at the ontology of genes and the relationship between proteins, we nominated important biomolecules. Accordingly, NCOR1, KIT, MITF, ESF1, ARNT2, TCF7L2, and KRR1 proteins showed an important role in these connections. Finally, NCOR1, KIT, KRR1, and ESF1 proteins showed a more prominent role in the molecular mechanisms of S-1, Docetaxel, and Cisplatin in gastric cancer associated with or without H. pylori.

Efficacy of S-1 Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Resected Biliary Tract Cancer: A Retrospective Propensity-Matched Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Surgical resection is considered an effective cure for biliary tract cancer (BTC); however, the prognosis is unsatisfactory despite improved surgical techniques and perioperative management. The recurrence rate remains high even after curative resection. The efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in pancreatic and gastric cancers has been previously reported, and the feasibility of adjuvant therapy with S-1 has recently been reported in patients with resected BTC. We aimed to retrospectively investigate the effects of adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 on resected advanced BTC.

METHODS

We included data from 438 BTC patients who underwent resection between 2001 and 2020. After excluding patients with pTis-pT1 (n = 112) and other exclusion criteria, 266 patients were included in the analysis.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching, 48 patients received S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy (S-1 group), and 48 patients received non-S1 adjuvant chemotherapy or underwent surgery alone (Non-S-1 group). The patients in the S-1 group had significantly better overall survival (OS) than those in the non-S-1 group (MST 51 vs 37 months, hazard ratio [HR]:.54, 95% confidence interval [CI]:.30-.98, P = .04). The S-1 group had a significantly better recurrence-free survival (RFS) than the non-S-1 group (94 vs 21 months, HR: .57, 95% CI: .33-.97, P = .03). Subgroup analyses for OS and RFS exhibited the benefits of S-1 in patients aged <75 years and in patients with primary sites of extrahepatic and perineural invasion and curability of R0.

DISCUSSION

S-1 adjuvant therapy is promising for improving the postoperative survival of patients with resected advanced BTC, positive nerve invasion, and R0 resection.

Early Tumor Shrinkage and Depth of Response as Predictors of Survival for Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer: An Exploratory Analysis of JCOG1113

BACKGROUND

Recent studies suggest that early tumor shrinkage (ETS) and depth of response (DpR) reflect outcomes of chemotherapy in various cancers. This study evaluated the association of ETS and DpR with clinical outcomes using data from JCOG1113, which demonstrated the non-inferiority of gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS) to gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC) for chemotherapy-naïve advanced biliary tract cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In total, 354 (289 with measurable target lesions) patients enrolled in JCOG1113 were divided into ETS-unachieved and ETS-achieved groups (≥20% tumor reduction at week 6) and DpR-low and DpR-high groups (≥40% maximum shrinkage) until 12 weeks after enrollment. The impact of ETS and DpR on survival outcome was evaluated using the multivariable Cox proportional hazard model.

RESULTS

The proportions of patients in the ETS-achieved and DpR-high groups were similar between the 2 treatment arms. The hazard ratios (HRs) of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for the ETS-achieved group were 0.70 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.52-0.93) and 0.60 (95%CI, 0.44-0.81), respectively. The HRs of PFS and OS for the DpR-high group were 0.67 (95%CI, 0.48-0.94) and 0.64 (95%CI, 0.46-0.90), respectively. In the subpopulation treatment effect pattern plot analysis, most patients in the ETS-achieved group in the GC arm did not experience disease progression after 12 weeks from the landmark.

CONCLUSION

As on-treatment markers, ETS and DpR were effective tools. ETS was clinically useful, because it can be used to evaluate the outcomes of treatment early at a specific time.

Long-term Results of a Phase II Study of Neoadjuvant SOX for Advanced Gastric Cancer

BACKGROUND/AIM

This study aimed to evaluate the long-term survival outcomes from our previous study: a phase II study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 plus oxaliplatin for cT4 or N2-3 advanced gastric cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The patients with clinical T4 and/or N2 or more lymph nodes received two cycles (3 weeks per cycle) of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 plus oxaliplatin (oxaliplatin at 130 mg/m2 on day 1 and S-1 at 80-120 mg/day on days 1 to 14), followed by gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy. The final preplanned analysis of long-term outcomes, including overall and relapse-free survival, was performed. This trial has been completed and registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry under number UMIN 000024656.

RESULTS

Between May 2016 and March 2019, 30 patients were enrolled. All patients completed the protocol. After a median follow-up of 50 months for surviving patients, the 3-year overall and recurrence-free survival rates were 80.0% and 76.7%, respectively, at the last follow-up in March 2023, whereas the 5-year overall and recurrence-free survival rates were 72.7% and 73.0%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The administration of two cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 plus oxaliplatin, followed by D2 gastrectomy, was associated with relatively good long-term oncologic outcomes for patients with high-risk gastric cancer.

5-year follow-up results of a JCOG1104 (OPAS-1) phase III non-inferiority trial to compare 4 courses and 8 courses of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy for pathological stage II gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 for 1 year (corresponding to eight courses) is the standard treatment for pathological stage II gastric cancer. The phase III trial (JCOG1104) investigating the non-inferiority of four courses of S-1 to eight courses was terminated due to futility at the first interim analysis. To confirm the primary results, we reported the results after a 5-years follow-up in JCOG1104.

METHODS

Patients histologically diagnosed with stage II gastric cancer after radical gastrectomy were randomly assigned to receive S-1 for eight or four courses. In detail, 80 mg/m2/day S-1 was administered for 4 weeks followed by a 2-week rest as a single course.

RESULTS

Between February 16, 2012, and March 19, 2017, 590 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to 8-course (295 patients) and 4-course (295 patients) regimens. After a 5-years follow-up, the relapse-free survival at 3 years was 92.2% for the 8-course arm and 90.1% for the 4-course arm, and that at 5 years was 87.7% for the 8-course arm and 85.6% for the 4-course arm (hazard ratio 1.265, 95% CI 0.846-1.892). The overall survival at 3 years was 94.9% for the 8-course arm, 93.2% for the 4-course arm, and that at 5 years was 89.7% for the 8-course arm, and 88.6% for the 4-course arm (HR 1.121, 95% CI 0.719-1.749).

CONCLUSIONS

The survival of the four-course arm was slightly but consistently inferior to that of the eight-course arm. Eight-course S-1 should thus remain the standard adjuvant chemotherapy for pathological stage II gastric cancer.

Postoperative Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9 Level as a Good Indicator of Ineffective Response to the Currently Recommended S-1 Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Single-Center, Retrospective Study

PURPOSE

The intensity of adjuvant treatment for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs) has not been stratified according to the risk after resection. This study was designed to identify patients with PDACs in whom the current S-1 adjuvant treatment is ineffective.

METHODS

This single-center, retrospective study included patients who underwent pancreatectomy for PDACs from 2009 to 2020 at Sendai Open Hospital and were receiving S-1 adjuvant treatment. The independent risk factors for recurrence and survival were determined by using a Cox proportional hazards regression model. The effects of S-1 adjuvant treatment and detailed patterns of recurrence were evaluated in patients with high-risk factors.

RESULTS

Overall, 118 patients with PDAC received S-1 adjuvant treatment. Postoperative nonnormalized carbohydrate antigen (CA19-9) was a predictive risk factor for recurrence (p < 0.010; hazard ratio [HR], 3.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.26-6.62) and survival (p = 0.008; HR, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.24-4.11) after S-1 adjuvant treatment. In 24 patients with nonnormalized postoperative CA19-9, S-1 monotherapy was ineffective in preventing recurrence, even during the treatment period, compared with that noted in patients who did not receive adjuvant treatment. The recurrence rate during adjuvant treatment was 41.7%; in all cases, recurrence was caused by distant metastasis. The total recurrence rate was up to 95.8%, and distant recurrence was especially frequent.

CONCLUSIONS

The current S-1 adjuvant treatment regimen is ineffective for patients with postoperative nonnormalized CA19-9. The postoperative CA19-9 level may be a good indicator for further aggressive treatment. This study may lead to further discussions on intensity stratification of adjuvant treatments for PDAC.

Conversion surgery after successful response to chemotherapy (S-1 + oxaliplatin + nivolumab) in a patient with stage IV gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis (P1, CY1): a case report

We here present a case report of a patient with Stage IV gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis (P1, CY1) who underwent conversion surgery after a successful response to chemotherapy (S-1 + oxaliplatin + nivolumab). The patient was a woman in her 60 s. Her chief complaint was epigastric pain. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy showed Type 4 advanced carcinoma on the lesser curvature of the gastric body. Biopsy showed Group 5 (poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma) and HER2 was negative. Staging laparoscopy revealed seeding in the round ligament of the liver (P1) and adenocarcinoma cells in ascites (CY1). Ten courses of chemotherapy (S-1 + oxaliplatin + nivolumab) were administered, after which contrast-enhanced computed tomography showed that the primary tumor had shrunk and seeding was no longer detectable. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed scar-like changes. A second staging laparoscopy revealed that ascites cytology was negative and a biopsy of the round ligament of the liver showed no malignant cells (P0, CY0). Conversion surgery comprising laparoscopic total gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection and resection of the round ligament of the liver was performed. The postoperative course was uneventful. Histopathological examination of the resected specimen revealed no tumor cells in the gastric mesentery or the round ligament of the liver. The pathological diagnosis was gastric cancer [M, U, L, Less, Ant, Post, type4, T3(SS), N0, M0 (H0, P0, CY0), ypStage IIA]. Adjuvant chemotherapy (S-1) was commenced. The patient is still alive 7 months later with no evidence of recurrence.

S-1 as an alternative treatment after 5-fluorouracil-induced coronary vasospasm in a patient with small bowel adenocarcinoma: a case report

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is a chemotherapeutic agent used worldwide to treat various solid tumors. It may cause adverse cardiotoxic events, the most common of which is coronary vasospasm. Recently, the 2022 European Society for Medical Oncology guidelines for metastatic colorectal cancer recommended S-1 as an alternative therapy after 5-FU-induced cardiotoxicity; however, only limited data on Asian patients are available. Here, we report a case of safe administration of S-1 to a 72-year-old Japanese female patient with metastatic small bowel adenocarcinoma who developed 5-FU-induced coronary vasospasm. While receiving modified FOLFOX6 (5-FU plus leucovorin and oxaliplatin) as palliative chemotherapy, she experienced chest pain with electrocardiographic ST elevation. Chemotherapy was temporarily suspended, but treatment was resumed by switching from modified FOLFOX6 to SOX (S-1 plus oxaliplatin) as the tumor began to worsen. Owing to the adverse event of enteritis, the patient's treatment was switched to S-1 monotherapy after cycle 3, and S-1 monotherapy was continued without any cardiotoxicity. S-1 may be a promising alternative therapy after 5-FU-induced cardiotoxicity.

Long-term outcomes of neoadjuvant gemcitabine, nab-paclitaxel, and S1 (GAS) in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer with arterial contact: Results from a phase II trial

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

This study reports the long-term results of a phase II trial evaluating the clinical efficacy of neoadjuvant gemcitabine, nab-paclitaxel, and S1 (GAS) in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer with arterial contact (BRPC-A).

METHODS

A multicenter, single-arm, phase II trial was conducted. Patients received six cycles of GAS and patients without progressive disease were intended for R0 resection.

RESULTS

Of the 47 patients, 45 (96%) underwent pancreatectomy. At the time of this analysis, all patients were updated with no loss to follow-up. A total of 30 patients died, while the remaining 17 patients were followed for a median of 68.1 months. The updated median overall survival (OS) was 41.0 months, with 2- and 5-year OS rates of 68.0% and 44.6%, respectively. Multivariate analysis in the preoperative model showed that a tumor diameter reduction rate ≥10% and a CA19-9 reduction rate ≥95% after neoadjuvant chemotherapy remained independently associated with favorable survival. In the postoperative multivariate model, no lymph node metastasis, no major surgical complications, and completion of adjuvant chemotherapy were independently associated with improved OS.

CONCLUSIONS

This long-term evaluation of the neoadjuvant GAS trial demonstrated the high efficacy of the regimen, suggesting that it is a promising treatment option for patients with BRPC-A.

Implication of KDR Polymorphism rs2071559 on Therapeutic Outcomes and Safety of Postoperative Patients with Gastric Cancer Who Received S-1-Based Adjuvant Chemotherapy: A Real-World Exploratory Study

Objective

Regimens of S-1-based adjuvant chemotherapy are of great significance in attenuating recurrence risk in postoperative patients with gastric cancer (GC). Kinase insert-domain receptor (KDR) gene plays an essential role in tumor growth and metastasis. This study aimed to investigate the implication of KDR genotyping on the therapeutic outcomes of patients with gastric cancer (GC) who received S-1-based adjuvant chemotherapy.

Methods

A total of 169 postoperative GC with pathological staging of II and III and no metastasis who received S-1-based adjuvant chemotherapy were included retrospectively. Peripheral blood specimens were collected and prepared for KDR genotyping and KDR mRNA expression. Correlation between KDR genotype status and prognosis was performed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and multivariate analysis was ultimately adopted using Cox regression analysis.

Results

Median disease-free survival (DFS) of the 169 patients with GC was 5.1 years [95% confidence interval (CI): 4.25-5.95] and median overall survival (OS) was 6.7 years (95% CI: 5.44-7.96). Rs2071559 was located at the upstream region, and the prevalence among 169 patients with GC was as follows: AA genotype in 104 cases (61.5%), AG genotype in 57 cases (33.7%), and GG genotype in 8 cases (4.7%), yielding a minor allele frequency of 0.22, which was consistent with Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (P=0.958). Median DFS of patients with AA and AG/GG genotypes was 6.0 years and 4.0 years, respectively (P=0.002). Additionally, patients with the AA genotype had longer OS than those with the AG/GG genotype [median OS: not reached (NR) vs 5.5 years, P=0.011]. Additionally, KDR mRNA expression was significantly higher in patients with the AG/GG genotype than that in those with the AA genotype (P<0.001).

Conclusion

Rs2071559 in KDR gene might be a promising biomarker for evaluating the recurrence risk and OS of patients with GC who received S-1-based adjuvant chemotherapy. This conclusion should be confirmed in randomized clinical trials.

Adjuvant Chemotherapy With S-1 Plus Docetaxel Versus S-1 Plus Oxaliplatin in Stage III Gastric Cancer

BACKGROUND/AIM

The Japanese Gastric Cancer Treatment Guidelines recommend doublet chemotherapy (S-1 plus another chemotherapy) over S-1 alone for patients with pStage III gastric cancer who underwent radical gastrectomy. However, no consensus exists on adjuvant regimens for patients with pStage III gastric cancer. Therefore, we conducted a comparative study to evaluate the tolerability, safety, and survival outcomes of docetaxel plus S-1 (DS) and S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) therapies as adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with pStage III gastric cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively collected data from consecutive patients with gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy and received DS or SOX therapies postoperatively at the Osaka International Cancer Institute between December 2016 and December 2021. We conducted a propensity score matching analysis to balance clinical backgrounds.

RESULTS

Eighty patients who met the eligibility criteria were analyzed. After matching, 40 patients were included in the study (20 each in the DS and SOX groups). No significant adverse events were observed. The mean ratios of the delivered dose to the planned dose were 74.1% and 86.6% for S-1 and docetaxel in the DS group, respectively, and 75.8% and 76.9% for S-1 and oxaliplatin in the SOX group, respectively. No significant differences were found in recurrence-free and overall survival between the DS and SOX groups (p=0.688 and p=0.772, respectively).

CONCLUSION

DS and SOX therapies as adjuvants were safe and manageable for patients with pStage III gastric cancer who underwent radical gastrectomy. No significant differences were found in prognosis between the two therapies.

Addition of docetaxel to S-1 results in significantly superior 5-year survival outcomes in Stage III gastric cancer: a final report of the JACCRO GC-07 study

PURPOSE

A phase III trial comparing S-1 and docetaxel with S-1 alone as postoperative chemotherapy for pathologically Stage III gastric cancer was conducted and clarified the superiority of the doublet in terms of 3-year relapse-free survival as the primary endpoint (67.7% versus 57.4%, hazard ratio [HR] 0.715, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.587-0.871; p = 0.0008). This final report analyzed 5-year survival outcomes along with the incidence and pattern of late recurrences.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with histologically confirmed Stage III gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy were randomly assigned to receive adjuvant chemotherapy with either S-1 plus docetaxel or S-1 alone. The same 912 patients who were evaluated for 3-year survival outcomes in the previous report were analyzed.

RESULTS

Five-year overall survival rate of the S-1 plus docetaxel group (67.91%) was significantly superior to that in the S-1 group (60.27%; HR 0.752, 95% CI 0.613-0.922; p = 0.0059). The incidence of late recurrence at > 3 years after randomization was similar in both groups (7.3% versus 7.2%). Peritoneal dissemination was the most common pattern of late recurrence. Addition of docetaxel significantly suppressed relapse through the lymphatic (6.8% [95% CI 4.52-9.17] versus 15% [95% CI 11.76-18.30]; p < 0.0001) and hematogenous (10.2% [95% CI 7.37-12.94] versus 15.7% [95% CI 12.36-19.01]; p < 0.0137) pathways throughout the 5 years of follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The survival benefit of postoperative chemotherapy with S-1 and docetaxel in terms of 5-year overall survival rate was confirmed for patients with pathologically Stage III gastric cancer, although late recurrences were not prevented.

A Phase II Study of S-1 plus Oxaliplatin for Patients with Recurrent Non-Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Uterine Cervix (Tohoku Gynecologic Cancer Unit: TGCU206 Study)

Recurrent non-squamous cell carcinoma (non-SCC) of the uterine cervix is resistant to treatment and has a poor prognosis. The efficacy and safety of S-1/oxaliplatin (SOX) therapy in patients with recurrent non-SCC was examined in a phase II study. Fifteen patients were enrolled between August 2013 and March 2023. S-1 was administered orally at a daily dose of 80-120 mg for 14 days, and oxaliplatin was administered intravenously at a dose of 100 mg/m2 on day 1. Each treatment cycle lasted 21 days. The anti-tumor effects, adverse events, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were investigated. The median patient age was 54 (41-74) years. The anti-tumor effect was rated as a partial response in five patients, stable disease in four, and progressive disease in 6. The overall response rate was 33% and the disease control rate was 60%. Regarding hematologic toxicities of grade 3 or more severity, leukopenia, neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia occurred in 26.6-40.0%. None of the patients discontinued the treatment because of adverse events. The median PFS and OS were 6 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2-11 months) and 22 months (95% CI: 11-23 months), respectively. No treatment-related deaths occurred. These results suggest that SOX therapy is useful for the treatment of recurrent non-SCC with promising anti-tumor effects and minimal adverse events.

A randomized phase III study of docetaxel alone versus docetaxel plus S-1 in patients with previously treated non-small cell lung cancer: JMTO LC09-01

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of the combination chemotherapy of docetaxel plus S-1 in patients with previously treated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) compared to docetaxel alone.

METHODS

Patients with previously treated NSCLC were randomly assigned to docetaxel alone (arm A) or a combination of docetaxel and S-1 (arm B) for a maximum of four cycles. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

The study was terminated early because of poor accrual. The number of patients evaluated were 74 and 77 in arm A and arm B, respectively. The median OS was 9.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.8-15.2) and 12.3 months (95% CI: 9.2-14.5) in arms A and B, respectively. In arms A and B, the median progression-free survival was 3.5 months (95% CI: 2.7-4.0) and 4.1 months (95% CI: 3.2-4.7), respectively. No statistically significant difference was observed in OS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.984, 95% CI: 0.682-1.419, p = 0.4569) or progression-free survival (HR: 0.823, 95% CI: 0.528-1.282, p = 0.0953). The major toxicity was myelosuppression. The incidence of grade 3 or more neutropenia was higher in arm A than in arm B (44.6% vs. 35.1%). However, the incidence of grade 3 or more febrile neutropenia and infection with neutropenia (12.2% vs. 22.1%) was more frequently observed in arm B.

CONCLUSIONS

The prematurely terminated study did not show the benefit of two cytotoxic agents over single-agent therapy for previously treated NSCLC patients.

Clinical implications and chemo-sensitivity of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with poorly cohesive cells-gastric cancer

PURPOSE

Poorly cohesive cells-gastric cancer (PCC-GC) represents distinct features within the GC spectrum. The present study investigated the clinicopathologic characteristics and chemo-sensitivity for a relatively large cohort of PCC-GC patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 268 patients diagnosed with stage II or III PCC-GC were included. GC cell lines were also analyzed for drug sensitivity to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and oxaliplatin in vitro.

RESULTS

One hundred fifteen (42.9%) patients were stage II and 153 (57.1%) were stage III. Two hundred twenty-three (83.2%) patients received adjuvant therapy. Among these patients, 139 (62.3%) received CAPOX and 84 (37.7%) received S-1. With a median follow-up of 38.9 (1.6-137.8) months, the estimated 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 52.3% and 61.0%, respectively. In the univariate analysis, survival was significantly better in the adjuvant chemotherapy group than in the surgery only group. In the subgroup analysis, there was no significant difference in DFS or OS between the types of adjuvant chemotherapy for either disease stage. In vitro cell line analysis, different responses to 5-FU and oxaliplatin were observed in SRC and non-SRC, where the treatment in KATOIII cell lines with oxaliplatin had less effect at a higher concentration compared to non-SRC cell lines.

CONCLUSION

The current study found that adjuvant chemotherapy was not significantly associated with survival benefit for patients with resected stage II and III PCC-GC. Plus, S-1 showed numerically longer DFS and OS compared to CAPOX in PCC-GC patients, although no significant in the multivariate analysis.

S-1 maintenance therapy in advanced gastric cancer without disease progression after first-line chemotherapy: A retrospective analysis

For patients with advanced gastric cancer after chemotherapy, the optimal mode of maintenance therapy is not yet clear. This research aimed to compare the efficacy and adverse effects of S-1 maintenance therapy and follow-up observation in patients with advanced gastric cancer without disease progression after first-line combined chemotherapy. This study retrospectively analyzed 106 patients from January 2018 to December 2021. The primary endpoints were overall survival and progression-free survival, the secondary endpoint was chemotherapy-related toxicity, and the curative effects and baseline characteristics of the patients were analyzed. Longer progression-free survival and overall survival were observed in the S-1 maintenance treatment group than in the follow-up observation group (p < 0.001). No obvious differences existed in the subgroup results regarding progression-free survival or overall survival (p > 0.05). In the maintenance treatment group, the occurrence of thrombocytopenia and hand-foot syndrome was significantly increased (p < 0.001). No toxicity-related deaths occurred. The included patients without disease progression after first-line combined chemotherapy can achieve significant survival benefits by receiving S-1 maintenance therapy. The patient's tolerance to S-1 maintenance therapy was good.

Doxifluridine versus Tegafur/Gimeracil/Oteracil (S-1) as adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with gastric cancer after gastrectomy: A propensity score-matched analysis

INTRODUCTION

Doxifluridine (DF), an oral 5-FU prodrug, has been used for various solid cancers due to its efficacy and low toxicity. We aim to evaluate the effect of DF as adjuvant monotherapy in advanced gastric cancer.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of 263 patients with advanced gastric cancer who underwent curative gastrectomy between January 2010 and December 2013 at our institute. Since previous randomized control trials have confirmed the efficacy of S-1 as adjuvant chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer, we analyzed the oncologic effect and patient compliance of the DF group compared to the S-1 group. After propensity score matching, 48 patients were included in each group.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in 5-year overall survival (OS) and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) between DF and S-1 groups (5-year OS; 77.1% vs 75.0%; p = 0.729, 5-year DFS; 76.6% vs 73.9%; p = 0.748). The completion rates of the DF and S-1 groups were 60.4% and 72.9%, respectively (p = 0.194). The mean relative dose intensity of the DF and S-1 groups were 76.2% and 84.2%, respectively (p = 0.195). After multivariate analysis, the chemotherapy regimen was not a risk factor for OS and DFS, whereas relative dose intensity and pathologic stage were independent prognostic factors.

CONCLUSION

There was no significant difference in the oncologic effect and patient compliance between DF and S-1 groups. DF could be an alternative option for adjuvant chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer. In addition, we confirmed that relative dose intensity is an important independent prognostic factor for survival.

Effectiveness and safety of anlotinib with or without S-1 in the treatment of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in a Chinese population: a prospective, phase 2 study

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to observe the safety and efficacy of anlotinib (ANL) alone or combined with S-1 in the first-line treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty-four patients with untreated advanced HCC who could not be resected were randomly divided into the ANL group (n = 27) and ANL+S-1 group (n = 27). The ANL group was given 10 mg ANL orally once a day for 14 consecutive days, stopped for 1 week, and repeated every 21 days. The ANL+S-1 group was given 10 mg ANL once a day orally and 40 mg S-1 twice a day orally for 14 consecutive days, stopped for 1 week, repeated every 21 days. All patients were treated until the disease progressed or toxicity became unacceptable. For patients who could not tolerate adverse reactions, the ANL dose should be reduced to 8 mg per day. CT or MRI was reviewed every 6 weeks to evaluate the efficacy.

RESULTS

A total of 44 patients were included in the results analysis, including 22 patients in the ANL group and 22 patients in the ANL+S-1 group. In the ANL group, the objective response rate (ORR) was 4.5% (1/22), the disease control rate (DCR) was 77.3% (17/22), the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.2 months (95% CI: 3.6-6.0) and the median overall survival (mOS) was 7.0 months (95% CI: 6.3-9.0). In the ANL+S-1 group, the ORR was 18.2% (4/22), the DCR was 59.1% (13/22), the median PFS was 4.0 months (95% CI: 3.6-5.4) and the mOS was 6.0 months (95% CI: 5.5-7.4). There was no significant difference in ORR (p = 0.345) or DCR (p = 0.195) between the two groups. Adverse reactions were mainly hypertension, anorexia, fatigue, liver transaminase heightened and hand and foot skin reaction.

CONCLUSIONS

ANL monotherapy was effective in the treatment of advanced HCC, and adverse reactions have been able to tolerated.

Phase I dose-escalation study on irinotecan, cisplatin, and S-1 combination in chemotherapy-naïve patients with HER2-negative advanced gastric cancer (HERBIS-4B, OGSG 1106)

BACKGROUND

The development of triplet regimens for advanced gastric cancer is challenging. The aim of this phase I dose-escalation study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose and recommended dose of the combination of irinotecan, cisplatin, and S-1 in chemotherapy-naïve patients with HER2-negative advanced gastric cancer.

METHODS

The 3 + 3 design was adopted. Every 4 weeks, patients received an escalating dose of intravenous irinotecan (100-150 mg/m2) on day 1 and fixed doses of intravenous cisplatin (60 mg/m2) on day 1 and oral S-1 (80 mg/m2) on days 1 to 14.

RESULTS

Twelve patients were enrolled in two dose level cohorts. In the level 1 cohort (irinotecan 100 mg/m2, cisplatin 60 mg/m2, and S-1 80 mg/m2), dose-limiting toxicity including grade 4 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia occurred in one of six patients, whereas in the level 2 cohort (irinotecan 125 mg/m2, cisplatin 60 mg/m2, and S-1 80 mg/m2), dose-limiting toxicities including grade 4 neutropenia developed in two of six patients. Thus, the level 1 and 2 doses were determined to be the recommended and maximum tolerated doses, respectively. Common grade 3 or higher adverse events were neutropenia (75%; n = 9), anemia (25%; n = 3), anorexia (8%; n = 1), and febrile neutropenia (17%; n = 2). Irinotecan, cisplatin, and S-1 combination therapy achieved an overall response rate of 67% with a median progression-free survival and overall survival of 19.3 and 22.4 months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The potential treatment efficacy of this triplet regimen in HER2-negative advanced gastric cancer warrants further evaluation, especially in patients requiring intensive chemotherapy.

A pooled analysis of the OGSG0604 and OGSG1002 trials

BACKGROUND

S-1 plus docetaxel (DS) therapy followed by S-1 is the standard of care in Japan in postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III gastric cancer, but long-term survival and the number of DS cycles required are unclear. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of the number of cycles of DS therapy on the 5-year survival in stage III gastric cancer in a pooled analysis of two phase II trials (OGSG0604 and OGSG1002).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with histologically confirmed stage III gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy were enrolled in this pooled analysis. They received DS therapy for four or eight cycles, followed by S-1 until 1 year postgastrectomy. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and the 5-year disease free survival (DFS) by the landmark analysis was evaluated.

RESULTS

In total, 113 patients from the OGSG0604 and OGSG1002 trials were enrolled in this study. The landmark analysis showed a 5-year OS that was better with four to eight cycles of DS therapy than with one to three cycles of DS therapy, with the best 5-year OS of 77.4% (95% confidence interval, 66.5-90.1%) for eight cycles. The 5-year DFS was approximately 66% when four or eight cycles of DS therapy were given.

CONCLUSION

Although eight cycles of DS therapy may prolong prognosis, the present study did not provide a clear conclusion as to how many DS therapy cycles are needed to improve prognosis after D2 gastrectomy for stage III gastric cancer.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registration number: UMIN00000714 and UMIN000004440.

Efficacy and safety of gemcitabine plus S-1 vs. gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel in treatment-naïve advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVE

Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) is the standard first-line therapy for advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine derivative, as compared with gemcitabine, is non-inferior in terms of overall survival (OS) and is associated with lower hematologic toxicity. Accordingly, S-1 is a convenient oral alternative treatment for advanced PDAC. This study was aimed at comparing the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS) vs. GnP as first-line chemotherapy for advanced PDAC.

METHODS

Patients with advanced PDAC who received first-line GS or GnP at the Peking Union Medical College Hospital between March 2011 and November 2022 were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 300 patients were assessed, of whom 84 received GS and 216 received GnP. The chemotherapy completion rate was higher with GS than GnP (50.0% vs. 30.3%, P = 0.0028). The objective response rate (ORR) was slightly higher (14.3% vs. 9.7%, P = 0.35), and the median OS was significantly longer (17.9 months vs. 13.3 months, P = 0.0078), in the GS group than the GnP group. However, the median progression-free survival (PFS) did not significantly differ between groups. Leukopenia risk was significantly lower in the GS group than the GnP group (14.9% vs. 28.1%, P = 0.049).

CONCLUSIONS

As first-line chemotherapy for advanced PDAC, the GS regimen led to a significantly longer OS than the GnP regimen. The PFS, ORR, and incidence of severe adverse events were comparable between the GS and GnP groups.

Relationship between histopathological therapeutic effect and prognosis in oral cancer patients after preoperative S-1 chemotherapy followed by surgery

OBJECTIVES

Preoperative S-1 chemotherapy is administered to prevent tumor proliferation before surgery in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the histological therapeutic effect and prognosis in patients with OSCC after pre-operative S-1 chemotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Among 461 OSCC cases, 281 patients who received preoperative S-1 chemotherapy were compared with 180 patients that did not receive chemotherapy to determine the histological therapeutic effect in the resected specimens and the differences in relapse-free survival.

RESULTS

The histological chemotherapeutic effect was well correlated with the subsequent prognosis. In an examination of the combined effect of treatment and ypStage, the groups with good S-1 treatment effects had extremely good prognoses, even if the postoperative resection specimens were within the same ypStage. In a stratified search of patients who received S-1 for more than 7 days and who had a significantly better prognosis than those who did not receive S-1, it was found that the prognosis was significantly better for patients with tongue cancer according to site; furthermore, tongue cancer, age under 70 years of age, male sex, and clinical stage I were factors associated with a significantly better prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Even if the postoperative resection specimens were within the same ypStage, the groups that responded to S-1 treatment were considered to have extremely good prognoses.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

A good adaptation for S-1 was tongue cancer, and especially tongue cancer with cStage I, male sex, and age less than 70 years old.

Standard versus delayed initiation of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery for pancreatic cancer: a secondary analysis of a nationwide cohort by the Japan Pancreas Society

BACKGROUND

Based on the Japan Adjuvant Study Group of Pancreatic Cancer-01 results, S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy has been the standard in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients in Japan and elsewhere, initiated within 10 weeks after surgery. To assess the clinical impact of this timing, we conducted a secondary analysis of a nationwide survey by the Japan Pancreas Society.

METHODS

A total of 3361 patients were divided into two groups: 2681 (79.8%) initiating the therapy within 10 weeks after surgery (standard) and 680 (20.2%) after 10 weeks (delayed). We compared recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) using the log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model with conditional landmark analysis between the groups. Results were verified by adjustment with inverse-probability-of-treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis.

RESULTS

The median timing of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy initiation was 50 days (interquartile range: 38-66). In the standard group, 5-year RFS and OS rates were 32.3-48.7%, respectively, compared with 25.0-38.7% in the delayed group. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals were 0.84 (0.76-0.93) for RFS (p < 0.001) and 0.77 (0.69-0.87) for OS (p < 0.001). The IPTW analysis yielded 5-year RFS rates of 32.1% and 25.3% in the standard versus delayed group, respectively [HR = 0.86 (0.77-0.96), p < 0.001] and 5-year OS rates of 48.3% and 39.8%, respectively [HR = 0.81 (0.71-0.92), p < 0.001].

CONCLUSIONS

Initiation of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy in resected PDAC patients within 10 weeks after surgery may offer survival benefit over later initiation.

Safety and Effectiveness of Chemotherapy in Elderly Biliary Tract Cancer Patients

The safety and effectiveness of chemotherapy in elderly patients with biliary tract cancer (BTC) remain unclear. Therefore, we retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent chemotherapy for locally advanced, metastatic, or recurrent BTC at our institution from January 2016 to December 2021. Of the 283 included patients, 91 (32.5%) were aged 75 years or older when initiating chemotherapy. Elderly patients were more likely than non-elderly patients to receive monotherapy with gemcitabine or S-1 (58.7% vs. 9.4%, p < 0.001) and were less likely to experience grade 3-4 toxicities (55.4% vs. 70.2%, p = 0.015). The rates of termination due to intolerance (6.5% vs. 5.8%, p = 0.800) and transition to second-line chemotherapy (39.1% vs. 40.3%, p = 0.849) were similar between groups. In the overall cohort, age was not an independent predictor of overall survival (OS). Within the elderly cohort, there were no differences in severe adverse events between patients receiving monotherapy and combination therapy (50.0% vs. 63.2%, p = 0.211). Median OS was longer in the combination therapy group (10.4 vs. 14.1 months; p = 0.010); however, choice of monotherapy was not an independent predictor of overall survival. Monotherapy appears to be a viable alternative in selected elderly BTC patients.

Effect of anlotinib combined with ticeorgio for recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a case report

For patients with locally unresectable recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma who relapsed after 2 years of radiotherapy, re-radiotherapy is also the preferred treatment. However, for patients relapsed within 2 years, the use of re-radiotherapy would be greatly limited by its adverse effects. Consequently, finding a new strategy to prolong the time of re-radiotherapy for locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma is very necessary to reduce the related side effects and improve the curative effect. Anlotinib is an orally available small molecule multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor that primarily inhibits VEGFR2/3, FGFR1-4, PDGFR α/β, c-Kit, and Ret. However, whether recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients can be treated with anlotinib combined with ticeorgio (also called S-1) remains unknown. Herein, we report a nasopharyngeal carcinoma patient with local recurrence after radical radiotherapy who benefited from combination treatment of anlotinib with ticeorgio.

Efficacy and safety of SOXIRI versus mFOLFIRINOX in advanced pancreatic cancer

Background

Modified fluorouracil/leucovorin/irinotecan/oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX) regimen (mFOLFIRINOX), comprised of fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan and oxaliplatin, is the first-line standard chemotherapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. The S-1/oxaliplatin/irinotecan (SOXIRI) regimen has also been studied recently under similar conditions. This study compared its efficacy and safety.

Methods

All cases of locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer treated with the SOXIRI or mFOLFIRINOX regimen in Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre from July 2012 to June 2021 were reviewed retrospectively. The data of patients who satisfied the inclusion criteria were compared between two cohorts, including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate, disease control rate and safety.

Results

A total of 198 patients were enrolled in the study, including 102 patients treated with SOXIRI and 96 patients treated with mFOLFIRINOX. There was no significant difference in OS [12.1 months versus 11.2 months, hazard ratio (HR) = 1.04, p = 0.81] or PFS (6.5 months versus 6.8 months, HR = 0.99, p = 0.96) between patients treated with SOXIRI and mFOLFIRINOX. In the subgroup analysis, patients with slightly elevated baseline total bilirubin (TBIL) or underweight patients before chemotherapy were more likely to have a longer OS or PFS from SOXIRI than from mFOLFIRINOX. In addition, the carbohydrate antigen (CA)19-9 decline was a good predictor for the efficacy and prognosis of both chemotherapy regimens. All grade adverse events were parallel in all kinds of toxicities except that anaemia was more common in the SOXIRI group than in the mFOLFIRINOX group (41.4% versus 24%, p = 0.03). The occurrence of any grade 3 to 4 toxicity was similar in the two groups.

Conclusions

For locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer patients, the SOXIRI regimen had similar efficacy and controllable safety compared with the mFOLFIRINOX regimen.

The prognostic value of including S-1 regimens in stage II and III gastric cancer patients: A propensity score matching and subgroup analyses

Background: Although numerous studies have indicated the increased efficacy of including S-1 in chemotherapy regimens, the effect of S-1 in the treatment of gastric cancer remains to be determined. In this study, we analyzed the prognostic value of chemotherapy regimens of including S-1 for stage II and III gastric cancer patients. Methods: A total of 412 patients with stage II gastric cancer and 902 patients with stage III gastric cancer who received D2 gastrectomy plus adjuvant chemotherapy or neoadjuvant chemotherapy were included in this study. Analysis and comparison at a ratio of 1:1 was performed to reduce the baseline differences. Progression-free survival, overall survival, and recurrence were the main outcome indicators. Results: After propensity score matching (PSM), we found that including S-1 in the chemotherapy regimen was only better than without S-1 in 5-year overall survival (OS) (83.6% VS 68.8%, Log-Rank P=0.005) and 5-year progression free survival (PFS) (71.6% VS 61.5%, Log-Rank P=0.005) for stage II gastric cancer patients. The difference in the recurrence (P=0.102), local-regional recurrence (P=0.062), and distant metastases (P=0.328) between the two groups were not significant. As for the stage III gastric cancer patients, Kaplan-Meier survival curves revealed that including S-1 was inferior to excluding S-1 in OS (P=0.023), but not in PFS(P=0.740). However, the difference in recurrence (P<0.001), local-regional recurrence (P=0.002), and distant metastases (P=0.011) between the two groups were significant. Furthermore, including S-1 increased mortality hazard by 27.2% compared to without S-1 (P=0.023) in the subgroup analyses of OS, but not in the subgroup analyses of PFS (P=0.268). Conclusions: Including S-1 did not exhibit superior effect over excluding S-1 in the prognosis of stage II and III gastric cancer patients, but significantly increased the risk of mortality in stage III gastric cancer patients. Moreover, for patients with stage III gastric cancer, including S-1 significantly increased the recurrence of the disease.

Definitive S-1/mitomycin-C chemoradiotherapy for stage II/III anal canal squamous cell carcinoma: a phase I/II dose-finding and single-arm confirmatory study (JCOG0903)

BACKGROUND

Definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with 5-fluorouracil plus mitomycin-C is a standard treatment for stage II/III squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal (SCCA). We performed this dose-finding and single-arm confirmatory trial of CRT with S-1 plus mitomycin-C to determine the recommended dose (RD) of S-1 and evaluate its efficacy and safety for locally advanced SCCA.

METHODS

Patients with clinical stage II/III SCCA (UICC 6th) received CRT comprising mitomycin-C (10 mg/m² on days 1 and 29) and S-1 (60 mg/m²/day at level 0 and 80 mg/m²/day at level 1 on days 1-14 and 29-42) with concurrent radiotherapy (59.4 Gy). Dose-finding used a 3 + 3 cohort design. The primary endpoint of the confirmatory trial was 3-year event-free survival. The sample size was 65, with one-sided alpha of 5%, power of 80%, and expected and threshold values of 75% and 60%, respectively.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine patients (dose-finding, n = 10; confirmatory, n = 59) were enrolled. The RD of S-1 was determined as 80 mg/m²/day. Three-year event-free survival in 63 eligible patients who received the RD was 65.0% (90% confidence interval 54.1-73.9). Three-year overall, progression-free, and colostomy-free survival rates were 87.3%, 85.7%, and 76.2%, respectively; the complete response rate was 81% on central review. Common grade 3/4 acute toxicities were leukopenia (63.1%), neutropenia (40.0%), diarrhea (20.0%), radiation dermatitis (15.4%), and febrile neutropenia (3.1%). No treatment-related deaths occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the primary endpoint was not met, S-1/mitomycin-C chemoradiotherapy had an acceptable toxicity profile and favorable 3-year survival and could be a treatment option for locally advanced SCCA.

CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION

jRCTs031180002.

S-1 maintenance therapy in Caucasian patients with metastatic esophagogastric adenocarcinoma-final results of the randomized AIO MATEO phase II trial

PURPOSE

Platinum-fluoropyrimidine combinations are standard of care for treatment of metastatic esophagogastric adenocarcinoma. The optimal duration of first-line chemotherapy is unknown, however, and maintenance strategies have not yet been established.

DESIGN

MATEO is an international randomized phase II trial exploring efficacy and safety of S-1 maintenance therapy in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma. After 3 months of first-line platinum-fluoropyrimidine-based induction therapy, patients without progression were randomized in a 2 : 1 allocation to receive S-1 monotherapy (arm A) or to continue combination chemotherapy (arm B). The primary objective was to show non-inferiority of overall survival in the S-1 maintenance group. Progression-free survival, adverse events, and quality of life were secondary endpoints.

RESULTS

From 2014 to 2019, 110 and 55 patients were randomized in arm A and arm B, respectively (recruitment closed prematurely). Median overall survival from randomization was 13.4 months for arm A and 11.4 months for arm B [hazard ratio 0.97 (80% confidence interval 0.76-1.23), P = 0.86]. Median progression-free survival from randomization was 4.3 and 6.1 months for arm A versus arm B, respectively [hazard ratio 1.10 (80% confidence interval 0.86-1.39), P = 0.62]. Patients in arm A had numerically fewer treatment-related adverse events (84.9% versus 93.9%) and significantly less peripheral sensory polyneuropathy ≥grade 2 (9.4% versus 36.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

S-1 maintenance following platinum-based induction therapy leads to non-inferior survival outcomes compared with the continuation of platinum-based combination. Toxicity patterns favor a fluoropyrimidine maintenance strategy. These data challenge the continued use of platinum combination chemotherapy after response to 3 months induction therapy in patients with advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative esophagogastric adenocarcinoma.

Risk stratification for predicting postoperative recurrence of gastric cancer by grade of venous invasion

BACKGROUND

Venous invasion (VI) in pathological examination of surgically resected gastric cancer (GC) may predict postoperative recurrence, but there are no objective criteria for VI grading.

METHODS

157 GC patients (pathological stages I 82, II 34, and III 41) who underwent surgery with curative intent were analyzed. VI was graded in pathological examination by elastica van Gieson staining based on the number of VIs per glass slide as follows: v0, 0; v1, 1-3; v2, 4-6; and v3, ≥ 7. Filling-type invasion in veins with a minor axis of ≥ 1 mm increased the grade by 1. The association of VI grade with prognosis was statistically analyzed.

RESULTS

Recurrence increased with VI grade (v0 1.5%, v1 29.6%, v2 41.7%, v3 78.6%). VI grade as well as pathological (p) tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) stage was a significant recurrence predictor by the multivariate Cox analysis. VI grade was implicated in hematogenous and peritoneal recurrences independent of pTNM stage but not in nodal recurrence. GC was then divided into two tiers, without indication of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) (pStage I, pT1 and pT3N0) and with AC indication (pStages remaining II/III), based on the ACTS-GC trial, which is common in Japan and East Asia. VI grade was a significant recurrence predictor in both tiers. v2/v3 revealed a significantly worse recurrence-free survival (RFS) than v0/v1 in GC without AC indication. v0/v1 exhibited RFS rate exceeding 95% even after 5 years but that of v2/v3 fell around 70% within one year postoperatively, suggesting that AC may be considered for this tier with v2/v3. GC with AC indication exhibited dismal RFS according to the VI grade. RFS rate fell below 80% within one year postoperatively when VI was positive, while recurrence was not observed in v0, which was, however, rare in this tier (10.9%). Differentiation grade did not significantly affect postoperative prognosis in both tiers.

CONCLUSIONS

VI grade was a significant predictor of postoperative GC recurrence irrespective of the AC indication based on the ACTS-GC study and this VI grading system could be applied in future studies of adjuvant therapy in GC presently deemed without AC indication in Japan.

Less necessity of adjuvant S-1 treatment in non-monarchE-eligible patients

BACKGROUND

In monarchE and Postoperative Therapy with Endocrine and TS-1 (POTENT) trials, abemaciclib and S-1 have, respectively, shown to be effective as adjuvant therapies for luminal breast cancer (BC), although whether patients who meet the criteria are at high risk of recurrence compared to non-eligible patients is still unknown. Here, we investigated recurrence risk according to the criteria of each trial in Japanese patients.

METHODS

We reviewed the records of 992 patients who received surgery at Chiba University Hospital for stage I-III BC from January 2017 to May 2022 and selected 553 analytic cohort patients and retrospectively analyzed the relapse-free survival of the patients as the primary endpoint. High-recurrence risk was defined according to monarchE trial and POTENT trial.

RESULTS

The 5-year RFS for monarchE cohort 1 and cohort 2 eligible patients were 77.78% and 89.33%, respectively, which were significantly lower than monarchE non-eligible patients (98.31%; p < 0.0001). However, the 5-year RFS rate for POTENT eligible patients (90.51%) was lower than for POTENT non-eligible patients (98.75%; p = 0.0001); excluding those who met the monarchE criteria, the prognosis of POTENT eligible patients had no significant differences from the prognosis of patients with POTENT non-eligible BC (p = 0.3100).

CONCLUSION

MonarchE criteria accurately identify patients who are prone to relapse. Moreover, although POTENT criteria also suggested a reasonable capacity for recurrence prediction, there was no significant difference in recurrence between POTENT non-eligible patients and the patients who were POTENT but not monarchE eligible. This might offer justification for reconsidering the use of S-1 in monarchE non-eligible patients.

Model-based cost-utility analysis of gemcitabine, cisplatin, and S-1 as triple therapy for advanced biliary tract cancer

BACKGROUND

The results of the KHBO1401-MITSUBA trial suggest the effectiveness of triple therapy using gemcitabine, cisplatin, and S-1; however, the cost-effectiveness of this treatment regimen remains unclear.

AIM

We conducted a cost-utility analysis comparing triple therapy using gemcitabine, cisplatin, and S-1 with doublet therapy using gemcitabine and cisplatin for advanced biliary tract cancer from the perspective of a Japanese healthcare payer to investigate the economic sustainability of healthcare interventions.

METHOD

Based on the results of the KHBO1401-MITSUBA clinical trial, a partitioned survival model set over a 10-year time horizon was developed. Cost and utility data were sourced from previous studies. Health outcomes were measured as quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Direct medical costs included drug costs and medical fees. The uncertainty and robustness of the model were evaluated using one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. The willingness-to-pay threshold was set at 7.5 million Japanese yen (68,306 US dollars).

RESULTS

Base case analysis revealed an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for triple therapy at 4,458,733 Japanese yen (40,608 US dollars) per QALY. One-way sensitivity analysis showed that the parameter variation in the overall survival curves for each therapy had impacts exceeding the threshold. According to probabilistic sensitivity analysis, triple therapy had an 83.1% chance of being cost-effective at the threshold, and the 95% credible interval for the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was 4,382,972-4,514,257 JPY (39,918-41,113 US dollars).

CONCLUSION

Triple therapy using gemcitabine, cisplatin, and S-1 is cost-effective for the primary treatment of biliary tract cancer in the Japanese healthcare system.

Impact of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy longer than 6 months on survival in patients with resected pancreatic cancer: a nationwide survey by the Japan Pancreas Society based on real-world data

BACKGROUND

Based on the Japan Adjuvant Study Group of Pancreatic Cancer 01 study, the standard duration of adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 (an oral 5-fluorouracil prodrug consisting of tegafur, gimeracil, and oteracil) in patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) was considered to be 6 months, but the impact of increasing its duration on postoperative survival was unknown. Here, the authors investigated this question by reviewing real-world data from a large cohort of patients with PDAC.

METHODS

In total, 3949 patients who underwent surgery for PDAC during the study period followed by S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy in board-certified institutions were included. Based on the duration of S-1 chemotherapy, two subgroups were defined: a standard-duration group that included patients who were treated for 180 ± 30 days and a longer duration group that included patients who received treatment for >210 days.

RESULTS

The median duration of S-1 chemotherapy was 167 days, with a mean ± standard deviation of 200 ± 193 days. After excluding patients who had a recurrence within 210 days after the initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy, postoperative recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in the standard-duration group (n = 1473) and the longer duration group (n = 975) were compared. RFS and OS did not differ significantly between the standard-duration and longer duration groups (5-year RFS: 37.8% vs. 36.2% respectively; p = .6186; 5-year OS: 52.8% vs. 53.4%, respectively; p = .5850). The insignificant difference was verified by multivariate analysis and propensity-score matching analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The current findings suggest that extending S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy beyond 6 months has no significant additional effect on survival in patients with PDAC. This could be useful in determining whether to extend S-1 chemotherapy in patients who have completed the standard 6-month treatment.

Evaluating the efficacy of post-operative chemotherapy after curative resection of stage IV gastric cancer with synchronous oligo metastasis: a multicenter retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Surgical resection of oligo-metastasis in gastric cancer (GC) is weakly recommended for patients without other incurable factors in the Japanese GC Treatment Guidelines. While post-operative chemotherapy is the standard treatment in patients with stage II or III GC, its efficacy for resected stage IV GC is unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of post-operative chemotherapy after curative resection of GC with oligo-metastasis.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with GC who were diagnosed with synchronous oligo-metastasis at 20 institutions in Japan between 2007 and 2012. The selection criteria were: adenocarcinoma, stage IV with oligo-metastasis at liver or lymph node without other distant metastasis, curative resection including synchronous oligo-metastasis, and no prior treatment of GC before surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 110 patients were collected. Of the 94 eligible patients, 84 underwent gastrectomy with surgical resection of oligo-metastasis (39 [41%] liver metastasis and 55, [59%] distant lymph node metastasis), followed by post-operative chemotherapy with S-1 (S1: n = 55), S1 plus cisplatin (CS: n = 22), or Others (n = 7). Moreover, 10 patients did not receive post-operative chemotherapy (Non-Cx). The median overall survival (OS) was 35.2 and 11.1 months in the post-operative chemotherapy and Non-Cx groups (hazard ratio, 3.56; 95% confidence interval, 1.74-7.30; p < 0.001), respectively. In multivariable analysis, Non-Cx and age over 70 years were identified as poor prognostic factors for OS (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Curative resection followed by post-operative chemotherapy in patients with GC with synchronous oligo-metastasis showed favorable survival.

Study of SOX combined with intraperitoneal high-dose paclitaxel in gastric cancer with synchronous peritoneal metastasis: A phase II single-arm clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Intraperitoneal paclitaxel is proved to be efficient for peritoneal metastasis of gastric cancer. It remains uncertain the efficacy and safety of the triplets regimen which combined intraperitoneal high-dose paclitaxel with systemic SOX in gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intraperitoneal administration of high-dose paclitaxel, intravenous oxaliplatin and S-1 in patients with peritoneal metastatic gastric cancer.

METHODS

This single-center, prospective, single-arm phase II study was conducted between January 2017 and May 2019 in West China Hospital, Sichuan University. Patients diagnosed with primary gastric cancer by histopathology and confirmed synchronous peritoneal metastasis were enrolled. This study aimed to evaluate efficacy and safety of intraperitoneal administration of high-dose paclitaxel (80 mg/m² , d1), intravenous oxaliplatin (100 mg/m² , d1), and S-1 (80 mg/m² , d1-14) of patients. The primary endpoint was 1-year overall survival rate, and the second endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and adverse events.

RESULTS

In this single-arm phase II clinical trial, 49 patients received SOX combined intraperitoneal high-dose paclitaxel treatment. One-year survival rate was 81.6% (95% CI, 68.6-90.0%). Median PFS and OS were 6.50 months (95% CI, 2.89-10.11) and 16.9 months (95% CI, 13.58 to 20.22), respectively; ORR was 55.3% (95% CI, 41.3-68.6) and DCR was 76.6% (95% CI, 62.8-86.4). Thirteen patients underwent second laparoscopic detection, but only nine ultimately underwent radical gastrectomy. Subgroup analysis showed that sPCI ≤12 was a good index for a favorable prognosis. The most frequent grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia (40.8%), anemia (22.4%), leukopenia (18.4%), nausea (14.3%), and vomiting (12.2%). None of the patients had any intraperitoneal catheter-related complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraperitoneal high-dose paclitaxel with systemic SOX is an effective and tolerable first-line treatment for patients with peritoneal metastatic gastric cancer and patients with sPCI≤12 scores might be recommended crowd for this regimen as conversion therapy.