Real-world experience with edoxaban for anticoagulation in children at risk for coronary artery thrombosis

BACKGROUND

Direct oral anticoagulants have the potential to improve care in children requiring chronic anticoagulation. Edoxaban has favourable pharmacokinetics that could benefit younger patients but data on long-term safety and efficacy for specific paediatric indications are lacking.

STUDY AIMS

We present a single-centre experience using edoxaban in children who require chronic anticoagulation for large coronary artery aneurysms secondary to Kawasaki disease.

METHODS

Weight-based dosing of once-daily oral edoxaban was offered as alternative to standard anticoagulation for patients aged 1-18 years. Chart review was performed for a median follow-up period of 49 months on edoxaban. Steady-state pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of edoxaban were also explored.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients on chronic therapy with edoxaban were included. No major bleeding events were reported. Two patients experienced coronary artery thrombosis after 23 and 38 months on edoxaban, 7 and 11 years after diagnosed with Kawasaki disease, respectively. This predicts 70% event-free rate at 12 years from diagnosis. Area under the curve estimates over the dosing interval of 24 hours were similar to those reported in adults.

CONCLUSIONS

Edoxaban use is feasible and well-tolerated for long-term use in paediatric population. We suggest appropriate exposure using weight-based once-daily dosing strategy that may be comparable to standard-of-care anticoagulation in prevention of coronary artery thrombosis. Larger studies are needed to evaluate long-term safety and efficacy of edoxaban in this population.

Effectiveness and Safety of Edoxaban Compared With Apixaban in Elderly Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Real-World Population-Based Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The very elderly (≥80 years) are at high risk of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and thromboembolism. Given its recent approval, the comparative effectiveness and safety of edoxaban in this population, relative to the commonly used apixaban, remain unknown.

METHODS

Using the United Kingdom Clinical Practice Research Datalink, we identified a cohort of patients aged ≥80 with incident nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and newly treated with edoxaban or apixaban between 2015 and 2021. Cohort entry was defined as the first prescription for one of the 2 drugs. We used propensity score fine stratification and weighting for confounding adjustment. A weighted Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the hazard ratios (HR) with 95% CI of ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack/systemic embolism (primary effectiveness outcome) and of major bleeding (primary safety outcome) associated with edoxaban compared with apixaban. We also assessed the risk of all-cause mortality and a composite outcome of ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack, systemic embolism, gastrointestinal bleeding, and intracranial hemorrhage as secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

The cohort included 7251 new-users of edoxaban and 39 991 of apixaban. Edoxaban and apixaban had similar incidence rates of thromboembolism (adjusted rates, 20.38 versus 19.22 per 1000 person-years; adjusted HR, 1.06 [95% CI, 0.89-1.26]), although the rates of major bleeding were higher with edoxaban (adjusted rates, 45.57 versus 31.21 per 1000 person-years; adjusted HR, 1.42 [95% CI, 1.26-1.61]). The risk of the composite outcome was 21% higher with edoxaban (adjusted HR, 1.21 [95% CI, 1.07-1.38]). All-cause mortality was similar between edoxaban and apixaban (adjusted HR, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.96-1.12]).

CONCLUSIONS

In very elderly patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, edoxaban resulted in similar thromboembolism prevention as apixaban, although it was associated with a higher risk of major bleeding. These findings may improve the management of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation by informing physicians on the choice of anticoagulant for this vulnerable population.

Edoxaban for the treatment of hypercoagulability and cerebral thromboembolism associated with cancer: A randomized clinical trial of biomarker targets

BACKGROUND

This study aimed compare efficacy of edoxaban and enoxaparin upon biomarkers of hypercoagulability in patients with cancer-related embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS).

METHODS

In this open-label, randomized, pilot trial, patients with cancer-related ESUS within 30 days of diagnosis were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive edoxaban (60 mg once daily) or enoxaparin (1 mg/kg twice daily) for 90 days. The primary endpoint was interval change of serum D-dimer level between days 0 and 7. The secondary endpoints were microembolic signals detected by transcranial Doppler at 7 and 90 days, the modified Rankin scale score, and stroke recurrence during 90 days. Safety outcomes included major bleeding and all-cause death at 90 days.

RESULTS

Of 303 patients with ischemic stroke and cancer, 40 fully met enrollment criteria and were randomized. Baseline D-dimer levels were numerically higher in the edoxaban group (22.9 ± 15.9 μg/mL vs 16.9 ± 16.9 μg/mL). D-dimer level change (%) between days 0 and 7 was similar in the two groups (53.2 ± 25.7 vs 52.2 ± 52.0; P = 0.11). Microembolic signals were detected in 41.1% and 43.8% at baseline, 41.2% and 42.9% at day 7, and 25.0% and 28.6% at day 90 in the edoxaban and enoxaparin groups, respectively. Non-significantly higher major bleeding (35.0% vs 10.0%, P = 0.06) and 90-day mortality (40.0% vs 25.0%, P = 0.31) were noted in the edoxaban group.

CONCLUSION

Edoxaban and enoxaparin were comparable with respect to the biomarkers of hypercoagulability and cerebral thromboembolism. Larger trials are warranted to compare effects of edoxaban and enoxaparin upon recurrent stroke and major bleeding in patients with cancer-related ESUS.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03570281 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03570281).

Prevalence, contemporary trends and associated factors of potentially inappropriate prescription of edoxaban in real-world clinical practice: A subanalysis of the SUNSHINE registry

AIM

As the direct oral anticoagulant most recently approved in China, data pertaining to clinical edoxaban use are still scarce. This study investigated the prevalence of and contemporary trends in edoxaban prescription among Chinese patients as well as factors associated with its inappropriate use in a multicentre registry of patients treated in real-world clinical practice.

METHODS

This real-world, prospective, multicentre and non-interventional study included 1005 inpatients treated with edoxaban. According to National Medical Products Administration and European Heart Rhythm Association guidelines, edoxaban therapy was determined to be appropriate or inappropriate in each case.

RESULTS

The median patient age was 70.0 years (interquartile range 61.0-78.0 years) and 46.3% were women. Overall, 456 (45.4%) patients received inappropriate edoxaban therapy, and common issues included an inappropriately low dosage (183, 18.2%) or wrong drug selection (109, 10.8%), high dosage (73, 7.3%), unreasonable off-label use (49, 4.9%), contraindicated medication combinations (27, 2.7%) and incorrect administration timing (16, 1.6%). Several factors, such as age ≥75 years (odds ratio [OR] = 1.921, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.355-2.723, P < 0.001), weight >60 kg (OR = 2.657, 95%CI 1.970-3.583, P < 0.001), severe renal insufficiency (OR = 1.988, 95% CI 1.043-3.790, P = 0.037), current anaemia (OR = 1.556, 95% CI 1.151-2.102, P = 0.004) and history of bleeding (OR = 2.931, 95% CI 1.605-5.351, P < 0.001) were associated with an increased risk of inappropriate edoxaban therapy, whereas factors associated with cardiovascular specialties, such as admission to a cardiovascular department (OR = 0.637, 95% CI 0.464-0.873, P = 0.005), dronedarone use (OR = 0.065, 95% CI 0.026-0.165, P < 0.001) and amiodarone use (OR = 0.365, 95% CI 0.209-0.637, P < 0.001) decreased this risk.

CONCLUSION

In this real-world study, 45.4% of patients received an inappropriate treatment with edoxaban. Multiple clinical characteristics can help identify patients who should receive edoxaban. Further development and implantation of educational activities and management strategies are needed to ensure the correct use of edoxaban.

Direct oral anticoagulants compared to warfarin in long-term management of cerebral venous thrombosis: A comprehensive meta-analysis

Objectives

We compared the safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) with those of warfarin in the long-term (≥6 months) treatment of cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT).

Methods

We searched electronic databases up to November 2023 to compare the use of DOACs and warfarin in CVT management. Modified Rankin scores (mRS), new intracranial hemorrhage, all-cause mortality, recurrence and nonrecanalisation events were used to assess outcome. RevMan v5.4 software and the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel method were utilized to analyse data.

Results

A total of 25 studies involving 2301 patients were identified as having treated CVT with either DOACs or warfarin. Good long-term mRS scores 0-2 (risk ratio [RR] = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.98-1.03; p = 0.61), new intracranial hemorrhage (RR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.48-2.08; p = 0.99), all-cause mortality (RR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.50-1.98; p = 0.99), nonrecanalisation (RR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.77-1.18; p = 0.65) and recurrence venous thrombosis events (RR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.33-1.22; p = 0.17) were similar between the two treatment arms. Subgroup analysis found recurrence of venous thrombosis was lower in the rivaroxaban group compared to warfarin (2.2% vs. 8.5%, RR = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.11-0.98; p = 0.05).

Conclusion

DOACs and warfarin provide comparable long-term safety and efficacy profiles. DOACs may be preferred over warfarin due to their ease of clinical management.

Risk Factors for Bleeding Events in Japanese Patients with Advanced Lung Cancer: Data from the Rising-VTE/NEJ037 Study

Despite the occurrence of various hemorrhagic events during advanced lung cancer treatment, few researchers have reported on their risk factors. Moreover, the development of cancer-related thromboembolism indicates anticoagulant use. However, adverse events such as bleeding should be monitored. In this study, we aimed to identify factors that influence the onset of hemorrhagic events in patients with lung cancer. The Rising-VTE/NEJ037 study was a multicenter, prospective, observational study. A total of 1008 patients with lung cancer who were unsuitable for radical resection or radiation were enrolled and followed up for 2 years. Multivariate analysis using a Cox proportional hazard model was performed to compare the outcomes of the time to the onset of hemorrhagic events for 2 years after registration. Hemorrhagic events occurred in 115 patients (11.4%), with 35 (30.4%) experiencing major bleeding. Significant risk factors included venous thromboembolism (VTE) (hazard ratio [HR]: 4.003, p < 0.001) and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status score of 1 (HR: 2.476, p < 0.001). Factors that significantly reduced hemorrhagic event risk were female sex (HR: 0.454, p = 0.002) and M1a status (HR: 0.542, p = 0.038). VTE is a risk factor for hemorrhagic events in patients with advanced lung cancer, and risks associated with anticoagulant therapy should be considered.

Treatment of atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in the world. Risk factor modification, anticoagulation, rhythm control, and rate control are the four pillars of its management. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines on management of AF were updated recently.

2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from May 12, 2022, to November 3, 2022, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through November 2022, during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee and added to the evidence tables, where appropriate.

STRUCTURE

Atrial fibrillation is the most sustained common arrhythmia, and its incidence and prevalence are increasing in the United States and globally. Recommendations from the "2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation" and the "2019 AHA/ACC/HRS Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation" have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing atrial fibrillation and thromboembolic risk assessment, anticoagulation, left atrial appendage occlusion, atrial fibrillation catheter or surgical ablation, and risk factor modification and atrial fibrillation prevention have been developed.

2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from May 12, 2022, to November 3, 2022, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through November 2022, during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee and added to the evidence tables, where appropriate.

STRUCTURE

Atrial fibrillation is the most sustained common arrhythmia, and its incidence and prevalence are increasing in the United States and globally. Recommendations from the "2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation" and the "2019 AHA/ACC/HRS Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation" have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing atrial fibrillation and thromboembolic risk assessment, anticoagulation, left atrial appendage occlusion, atrial fibrillation catheter or surgical ablation, and risk factor modification and atrial fibrillation prevention have been developed.

The Desirable Effects of Edoxaban on Thrombi in the Left Atrium Are Seemingly Connected to Pulmonary Vein Thrombi

Ischemic stroke (IS) causes various degrees of disability that sometimes induce social problems: therefore, preventing the occurrence and recurrence of IS is important. The recovery of motor function has been extensively studied. The characteristics of retrieved thrombi have become clearer; however, it is unclear what thrombi cause IS. Pulmonary vein thrombi (PVTs), such as those of the IS, can cause systemic thrombosis, by releasing several sizes of particles. PVTs are common but are underrated and can be detected via enhanced computed tomography (CT) and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). PVTs often extend to the left atrium (LA) and can be mainly diagnosed using not enhanced CT but rather TEE. Extended LA thrombi are characterized by a lack of periodic movement with heartbeats. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are useful for preventing IS. We reported that rivaroxaban partially dissolved LA thrombi and PVTs using enhanced CT and TEE; however, the effects of edoxaban on LA thrombi and PVTs are unclear. We checked the images using enhanced CT and TEE and treated them with edoxaban. The patient was a 73-year-old female with easy fatigability. Edoxaban desirably affected the LA thrombi, and edoxaban partially dissolved the thrombi in the right lower pulmonary vein (RLPV). A decreased dose of edoxaban (15 mg, once a day) had similar effects on LA thrombi and RLPV thrombi, suggesting that this treatment could be useful for preventing IS.

Successful Treatment With the Oral Factor Xa Inhibitor Edoxaban in Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia With Thrombosis

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with thrombosis (HITT) is a rare immune reaction to the drug heparin that causes increased blood clotting, putting patients at risk for arterial and venous thromboembolism which can have severe consequences. We present a case of HITT successfully treated with the direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC), edoxaban. A 56-year-old man had surgery to remove a colorectal mass. After discharge, he developed chest discomfort, shortness of breath, and low oxygen levels and was diagnosed with a right-sided lobar pulmonary embolism. His platelet count dropped, his tests confirmed a diagnosis of HITT, and he was initially treated with fondaparinux. After showing clinical and laboratory improvement, he was switched to edoxaban. Despite being diagnosed with colonic adenocarcinoma during follow-up, the patient's platelet count returned to normal, and he did not experience any more blood clots or serious bleeding events. The use of DOACs like edoxaban as potential therapies for HITT is promising; further research is being conducted to evaluate their effectiveness, safety, and potential benefits for treating this acquired high-risk thrombophilia.

Exploring the Prognostic Performance of MECKI Score in Heart Failure Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation Treated with Edoxaban

INTRODUCTION

Risk stratification in heart failure (HF) is essential for clinical and therapeutic management. The Metabolic Exercise test data combined with Cardiac and Kidney Indexes (MECKI) score is a validated prognostic model for assessing cardiovascular risk in HF patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). From the validation of the score, the prevalence of HF patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), such as edoxaban, for non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) has been increasing in recent years. This study aims to evaluate the reliability of the MECKI score in HFrEF patients treated with edoxaban for NVAF.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study included consecutive outpatients with HF and NVAF treated with edoxaban (n = 83) who underwent a cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET). They were matched by propensity score with a retrospective group of HFrEF patients with NVAF treated with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) from the MECKI score registry (n = 844). The study endpoint was the risk of cardiovascular mortality, urgent heart transplantation, or Left Ventricle Assist Device (LVAD) implantation.

RESULTS

Edoxaban patients were treated with a more optimized HF therapy and had different clinical characteristics, with a similar MECKI score. After propensity score, 77 patients treated with edoxaban were successfully matched with the MECKI-VKA control cohort. In both groups, MECKI accurately predicted the composite endpoint with similar area under the curves (AUC = 0.757 vs. 0.829 in the MECKI-VKA vs. edoxaban-treated group, respectively, p = 0.452). The two populations' survival appeared non-significantly different at the 2-year follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

this study confirms the prognostic accuracy of the MECKI score in HFrEF patients with NVAF treated with edoxaban, showing improved predictive power compared to VKA-treated patients.

Treatment Satisfaction and Convenience for Patients With Atrial Fibrillation on Edoxaban or Vitamin K Antagonists After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Post Hoc Analysis from the ENVISAGE-TAVI AF Trial

ENVISAGE-TAVI AF (Edoxaban versus Standard of Care and Their Effects on Clinical Outcomes in Patients Having Undergone Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation-Atrial Fibrillation; NCT02943785) was a prospective, randomized, open-label trial comparing non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant (NOAC) edoxaban with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in patients with atrial fibrillation after successful transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The effect of edoxaban- or VKA-based therapy on patient-reported outcomes remains unknown, as most studies focus on efficacy and safety. Pre-TAVR patient-reported expectations and post-TAVR Treatment Satisfaction and Convenience with edoxaban or VKA treatment (at months 3 and 12) were analyzed using the Perception of Anticoagulation Treatment Questionnaire (PACT-Q). This analysis included randomized and dosed patients with an evaluable PACT-Q1 assessment at baseline and ≥1 postbaseline assessment (PACT-Q2). Subanalyses included patients stratified by pre-TAVR anticoagulant (NOAC, VKA, no NOAC/VKA). Edoxaban- (n = 585) and VKA-treated (n = 522) patients had similar baseline characteristics and treatment expectations. Pre-TAVR anticoagulant use did not affect treatment expectations. After TAVR, edoxaban-treated patients had significantly higher Treatment Satisfaction and Convenience scores compared with VKA-treated patients at all time points (p <0.001 for all). Among edoxaban-treated patients, those who received VKAs pre-TAVR were significantly more satisfied with treatment than those who received NOACs (p <0.001) or no NOACs/VKAs (p = 0.003); however, there was no significant difference in the perception of convenience (p = 0.927 and p = 0.092, respectively). Conversely, among VKA-treated patients, the type of anticoagulant used pre-TAVR did not affect Treatment Satisfaction or Convenience scores post-TAVR. In conclusion, patients with atrial fibrillation who received edoxaban post-TAVR reported significantly higher Treatment Satisfaction and Convenience scores compared with those who received VKAs, resulting in a clinically meaningful difference between treatment groups.

Edoxaban for 12 Months Versus 3 Months in Patients With Cancer With Isolated Distal Deep Vein Thrombosis (ONCO DVT Study): An Open-Label, Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

The optimal duration of anticoagulation therapy for isolated distal deep vein thrombosis in patients with cancer is clinically relevant, but the evidence is lacking. The prolonged anticoagulation therapy could have a potential benefit for prevention of thrombotic events; however, it could also increase the risk of bleeding.

METHODS

In a multicenter, open-label, adjudicator-blinded, randomized clinical trial at 60 institutions in Japan, we randomly assigned patients with cancer with isolated distal deep vein thrombosis, in a 1-to-1 ratio, to receive either a 12-month or 3-month edoxaban treatment. The primary end point was a composite of a symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) or VTE-related death at 12 months. The major secondary end point was major bleeding at 12 months, according to the criteria of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. The primary hypothesis was that a 12-month edoxaban treatment was superior to a 3-month edoxaban treatment with respect to the primary end point.

RESULTS

From April 2019 through June 2022, 604 patients were randomized, and after excluding 3 patients who withdrew consent, 601 patients were included in the intention-to-treat population: 296 patients in the 12-month edoxaban group and 305 patients in the 3-month edoxaban group. The mean age was 70.8 years, 28% of the patients were men, and 20% of the patients had symptoms of deep vein thrombosis at baseline. The primary end point of a symptomatic recurrent VTE event or VTE-related death occurred in 3 of the 296 patients (1.0%) in the 12-month edoxaban group and in 22 of the 305 patients (7.2%) in the 3-month edoxaban group (odds ratio, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.03-0.44). The major secondary end point of major bleeding occurred in 28 of the 296 patients (9.5%) in the 12-month edoxaban group and in 22 of the 305 patients (7.2%) in the 3-month edoxaban group (odds ratio, 1.34; 95% CI, 0.75-2.41). The prespecified subgroups did not affect the estimates on the primary end point.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with cancer with isolated distal deep vein thrombosis, 12 months was superior to 3 months for an edoxaban treatment with respect to the composite outcome of a symptomatic recurrent VTE or VTE-related death.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03895502.

Real-world Safety and Effectiveness of Edoxaban in Patients with Venous Thromboembolism with or without Preceding Parenteral Anticoagulants: A Single-center Retrospective Study

Objective Edoxaban is an anticoagulant used for venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment and requires pretreatment with parenteral anticoagulants. However, pretreatment is not always performed in the clinical setting. In this study, we investigated the safety and effectiveness of edoxaban treatment in patients with VTE with or without pretreatment. Methods We retrospectively enrolled 364 patients who received edoxaban for VTE treatment between September 2014 and March 2020 and investigated patient demographics, VTE recurrence, and major bleeding as clinical outcomes in patients with or without pretreatment. Furthermore, the factors contributing to pretreatment decisions were assessed. Results Patients without pretreatment (n=208) had more active cancer cases and fewer pulmonary embolism complications than those with pretreatment (n=156). Lower levels of hemoglobin and higher levels of white blood cell counts, C-reactive protein, and D-dimer at the diagnosis were found in patients who received pretreatment than in those without pretreatment. No symptomatic VTE recurrence was observed. After propensity score matching, the cumulative incidence of major bleeding was not significantly higher in patients with pretreatment than in those without it (log-rank test, p=0.136). The incidence of deteriorated VTE on imaging did not significantly differ between patients with and without pretreatment, even after propensity matching (log-rank test, p=0.414). Conclusion In a real-world clinical setting, where physicians determined the use of parenteral anticoagulant lead-in according to their experience, patient demographics, and VTE characteristics, no significant differences were found regarding safety and effectiveness in edoxaban-treated VTE patients with or without pretreatment with parenteral anticoagulants.

Effectiveness and safety of edoxaban versus warfarin in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent cardiac arrhythmia type. Patients with AF are often administered anticoagulants to reduce the risk of ischemic stroke due to an irregular heartbeat. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of edoxaban versus warfarin in patients with nonvalvular AF by conducting an updated meta-analysis of real-world studies. Methods: In this comprehensive meta-analysis, we searched two databases, PubMed and EMBASE, and included retrospective cohort observational studies that compared edoxaban with warfarin in patients with nonvalvular AF from 1 January 2009, to 30 September 2023. The effectiveness and safety outcomes were ischemic stroke and major bleeding, respectively. In the final analysis, six retrospective observational studies involving 87,236 patients treated with warfarin and 40,933 patients treated with edoxaban were included. To analyze the data, we used a random-effects model to calculate the hazard ratio (HR). Results: Patients treated with edoxaban had a significantly lower risk of ischemic stroke [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.66; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.61-0.70; p < 0.0001] and major bleeding (HR = 0.58; 95% CI = 0.49-0.69; p < 0.0001) than those treated with warfarin. The sensitivity analysis results for ischemic stroke and major bleeding were as follows: HR = 0.66; 95% CI = 0.61-0.70; p < 0.0001 and HR = 0.58; 95% CI = 0.49-0.69; p < 0.0001, respectively. Conclusion: Our findings revealed that edoxaban performed better than warfarin against major bleeding and ischemic stroke.

Novel Drug-Drug Interaction of Potential Rifabutin-Induced Edoxaban Failure: A Case Report

Purpose: To report an incident of a breakthrough deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and potential example of a drug-drug interaction in a patient treated with edoxaban and rifabutin who was being treated for respiratory tuberculosis. Case: A 76-year-old male presented with anemia requiring transfusion and subsequent shortness of breath that was later diagnosed to be respiratory tuberculosis. He experienced a prolonged hospital stay due to persistently positive Mycobacterium tuberculosis respiratory samples and a complicated social situation that required continuous hospitalization for approximately five months. During his treatment the patient was transitioned from apixaban to edoxaban due to a drug-drug interaction with rifabutin. He subsequently had a DVT while on edoxaban after two months of therapy that would require him to transition to warfarin. Conclusion: This case represents an example of a potentially significant drug-drug interaction between edoxaban and rifabutin. Other direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) exhibit a potential drug-drug interaction that limit their effectiveness when used with rifamycins. This report describes the first known case of a patient experiencing a DVT after prolonged edoxaban use in combination with rifabutin. Treatment with DOACs for patients taking concomitant cytochrome P450 (CYP) inducers such as rifabutin may be more complicated than previously believed.

Prolonged Secondary Stroke Prevention with Edoxaban: A Long-Term Follow-Up of the SATES Study

BACKGROUND

Little evidence is available on the long-term efficacy and safety of edoxaban, mainly due to the recent release date. The primary objective of the study was to evaluate the safety of edoxaban, defined by the incidence of major bleedings. We then aimed to evaluate the incidence of thromboembolic events and the persistence of edoxaban therapy in the long-term.

METHODS

In this observational cohort study, we included ischemic stroke patients enrolled in a previous study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of long-term edoxaban treatment. Data were collected by a trained investigator through a structured telephone interview.

RESULTS

Sixty-three subjects (median age 81.0 (73.5-88.0) years, 38.1% male) were included in the study, with a mean follow-up of 4.4 ± 0.7 years (range: 3.2-5.5 years). Only one patient (1.6%, 0.4%/year) presented a major extracranial bleeding, and none had cerebral hemorrhage. Six thromboembolic events occurred in five patients (7.9%): three recurrent strokes, two transient ischemic attacks, and one myocardial infarction (2.2%/year). Over a follow-up period of more than three years, 13 patients discontinued edoxaban (20.6%). Conclusions: Edoxaban seems to be effective and safe in the long-term. The persistence rate of edoxaban therapy is optimal after more than three years of treatment.

Efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants in the pediatric population: a systematic review and a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) represent a cornerstone of adult venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment. Recently, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating DOACs in pediatrics have been performed.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of DOACs in the pediatric population.

METHODS

We systematically searched MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov from initiation up to August 20, 2022, for RCTs comparing DOACs to standard of care (SOC) in patients aged <18 years according to PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO registration CRD42022353870). The primary analysis was performed according to the anticoagulation intensity and clinical setting (ie, prophylaxis in cardiac disease or treatment in VTE). Efficacy outcomes were all-cause mortality and VTE. Safety outcomes were major bleeding (MB), clinically relevant non-MB, any bleeding, serious adverse events, and discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

Seven RCTs were included in the systematic review and 6 in the meta-analysis (3 prophylaxis in cardiac disease and 3 treatment in VTE). DOACs showed a significant reduction of VTE recurrence for treatment (odds ratio [OR] = 0.42; 95% CI, 0.19-0.94) and a nonsignificant reduction in VTE occurrence in prophylaxis (OR = 0.22; 95% CI, 0.03-1.55). No differences were observed for any bleeding, serious AEs, and MB in prophylaxis. Nonsignificant trends were observed for clinically relevant non-MB, MB in treatment, and discontinuation due to AE in prophylaxis. We found a significant increase in discontinuation due to AE in treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

DOAC treatment seems to reduce VTE compared with SOC without major safety issues in the pediatric population, whereas DOAC prophylaxis seems at least comparable to SOC.

Distinct pleiotropic effects of direct oral anticoagulants on cultured endothelial cells: a comprehensive review

Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) have simplified the treatment of thromboembolic disease. In addition to their established anticoagulant effects, there are indications from clinical and preclinical studies that DOACs exhibit also non-anticoagulant actions, such as anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant actions, advocating overall cardiovascular protection. In the present study, we provide a comprehensive overview of the existing knowledge on the pleiotropic effects of DOACs on endothelial cells (ECs) in vitro and their underlying mechanisms, while also identifying potential differences among DOACs. DOACs exhibit pleiotropic actions on ECs, such as anti-inflammatory, anti-atherosclerotic, and anti-fibrotic effects, as well as preservation of endothelial integrity. These effects appear to be mediated through inhibition of the proteinase-activated receptor signaling pathway. Furthermore, we discuss the potential differences among the four drugs in this class. Further research is needed to fully understand the pleiotropic effects of DOACs on ECs, their underlying mechanisms, as well as the heterogeneity between various DOACs. Such studies can pave the way for identifying biomarkers that can help personalize pharmacotherapy with this valuable class of drugs.

Development and Validation of the DOAC Score: A Novel Bleeding Risk Prediction Tool for Patients With Atrial Fibrillation on Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulants

BACKGROUND

Current clinical decision tools for assessing bleeding risk in individuals with atrial fibrillation (AF) have limited performance and were developed for individuals treated with warfarin. This study develops and validates a clinical risk score to personalize estimates of bleeding risk for individuals with atrial fibrillation taking direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs).

METHODS

Among individuals taking dabigatran 150 mg twice per day from 44 countries and 951 centers in this secondary analysis of the RE-LY trial (Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulation Therapy), a risk score was developed to determine the comparative risk for bleeding on the basis of covariates derived in a Cox proportional hazards model. The risk prediction model was internally validated with bootstrapping. The model was then further developed in the GARFIELD-AF registry (Global Anticoagulant Registry in the Field-Atrial Fibrillation), with individuals taking dabigatran, edoxaban, rivaroxaban, and apixaban. To determine generalizability in external cohorts and among individuals on different DOACs, the risk prediction model was validated in the COMBINE-AF (A Collaboration Between Multiple Institutions to Better Investigate Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant Use in Atrial Fibrillation) pooled clinical trial cohort and the Quebec Régie de l'Assurance Maladie du Québec and Med-Echo Administrative Databases (RAMQ) administrative database. The primary outcome was major bleeding. The risk score, termed the DOAC Score, was compared with the HAS-BLED score.

RESULTS

Of the 5684 patients in RE-LY, 386 (6.8%) experienced a major bleeding event, within a median follow-up of 1.74 years. The prediction model had an optimism-corrected C statistic of 0.73 after internal validation with bootstrapping and was well-calibrated based on visual inspection of calibration plots (goodness-of-fit P=0.57). The DOAC Score assigned points for age, creatinine clearance/glomerular filtration rate, underweight status, stroke/transient ischemic attack/embolism history, diabetes, hypertension, antiplatelet use, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory use, liver disease, and bleeding history, with each additional point scored associated with a 48.7% (95% CI, 38.9%-59.3%; P<0.001) increase in major bleeding in RE-LY. The score had superior performance to the HAS-BLED score in RE-LY (C statistic, 0.73 versus 0.60; P for difference <0.001) and among 12 296 individuals in GARFIELD-AF (C statistic, 0.71 versus 0.66; P for difference = 0.025). The DOAC Score had stronger predictive performance than the HAS-BLED score in both validation cohorts, including 25 586 individuals in COMBINE-AF (C statistic, 0.67 versus 0.63; P for difference <0.001) and 11 945 individuals in RAMQ (C statistic, 0.65 versus 0.58; P for difference <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In individuals with atrial fibrillation potentially eligible for DOAC therapy, the DOAC Score can help stratify patients on the basis of expected bleeding risk.

Early experiences with edoxaban for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation in the Southeast Asia region

Edoxaban, a once-daily, direct-acting oral anticoagulant, is approved to prevent stroke or systemic embolism in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and treat venous thromboembolism. The clinical benefit of edoxaban for stroke prevention in Asian patients with NVAF has been demonstrated in clinical and real-world studies. We share early clinical experiences with once-daily edoxaban and discuss its evidence-based use in patients with NVAF in Southeast Asia through several cases of patients at high risk, including frail patients, elderly patients with multiple comorbidities and patients with increased bleeding risk. These cases demonstrate the effectiveness and safety of once-daily edoxaban in patients with NVAF in Southeast Asia.

Stability of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Concentrations in Blood Samples for Accessibility Expansion of Chromogenic Assays

Background and Objectives: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are used for minimising the risk of thromboembolic events. In clinical practice, there is no need to measure DOAC concentration in the routine. Nevertheless, there are cases where such measurements are necessary, as the European Society of Cardiology's guideline recommends. However, determining DOAC levels is not available for everyone due to chromogenic assay availability limitations from sample storage problems, as tests are performed only in a few healthcare settings. This study aimed to assess whether more applicable storage conditions could be used for transportation to provide chromogenic assays for outpatient healthcare and other hospitals' practices. Materials and Methods: Chromogenic assays measuring anti-FXa (for rivaroxaban and edoxaban) and anti-FIIa (for dabigatran) were used. Concentrations were determined immediately after blood collection as baseline value: (1) after the storage of citrated whole blood in refrigerator (+2-8 °C); (2) of citrated plasma in refrigerator (+2-8 °C); and (3) of citrated frozen plasma (-20 °C) on the third and seventh days of storage. Acceptable change limits were considered stable if the deviation did not exceed ±20% of the baseline value. Results: The median (Cl 95%) baseline value of rivaroxaban was 168 (147-236) ng/mL; of dabigatran 139 (99-178) ng/mL; and of edoxaban-174 (135-259) ng/mL. The median deviation from a baseline value stored as citrate whole blood samples (+2-8 °C) was 5.4% and 3.4%; as citrated plasma (+2-8 °C) was 0.4% and -0.6%; and as citrated frozen plasma (-20 °C) was -0.2% and 0.2% on the third and seventh days of storage, respectively. Conclusions: Our data suggest that whole blood samples stored in a refrigerator, as well as citrated plasma samples stored in both the refrigerator and freezer, preserve DOAC concentration stable at +2-8 °C or -20 °C for up to 7 days, and are suitable for transportation, except for low-concentration samples.

Periinterventional Management of Edoxaban in Major Procedures: Results from the DRESDEN NOAC REGISTRY

Background  Edoxaban is a non-vitamin K dependent oral anticoagulant (NOAC) licensed for venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment or stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. Major surgical procedures are not uncommon in anticoagulated patients but data on perioperative edoxaban management are scarce. Patients and Methods  Using data from the prospective DRESDEN NOAC REGISTRY, we extracted data on major surgical procedures in edoxaban patients. Periinterventional edoxaban management patterns and rates of outcome events were evaluated until day 30 after procedure. Results  Between 2011 and 2021, 3,448 procedures were identified in edoxaban patients, including 287 (8.3%) major procedures. A scheduled interruption of edoxaban was observed in 284/287 major procedures (99%) with a total median edoxaban interruption time of 11.0 days (25-75th percentile: 5.0-18.0 days). Heparin bridging was documented in 183 procedures (46 prophylactic dosages, 111 intermediate and 26 therapeutic dosages). Overall, 7 (2.4%; 95% CI: 1.2-4.9%) major cardiovascular events (5 VTE, 2 arterial thromboembolic events) and 38 major bleedings (13.2%; 95% CI: 9.8-17.7%) were observed and 6 patients died (2.1%; 95% CI: 1.0-4.5%). Rates of major cardiovascular events with or without heparin bridging were comparable (4/137; 2.9%; 95% CI: 1.1-7.3% vs. 3/82; 3.7%; 95% CI: 1.3-10.2%). Major bleedings occurred numerically more frequent in patients receiving heparin bridging (23/137; 16.8%; 95% CI: 11.5-23.9%) versus procedures without heparin bridging (9/82; 11.0%; 95% CI: 5.9-19.6%). Conclusion  Within the limitations of our study design, real-world periprocedural edoxaban management seems effective and safe. Use of heparin bridging seems to have limited effects on reducing vascular events but may increase bleeding risk.

Determination of Anti-Xa Inhibitor Plasma Concentrations Using a Universal Edoxaban Calibrator

A universal calibrator for the determination of all anti-Xa inhibitors would support laboratory processes. We aimed to test the clinical performance of an anti-Xa assay utilizing a universal edoxaban calibrator to determine clinically relevant concentrations of all anti-Xa inhibitors. Following a pilot study, we enrolled 553 consecutive patients taking rivaroxaban, edoxaban, or apixaban from nine study centers in a prospective cross-sectional study. The Technochrom^® anti-Xa assay was conducted using the Technoview^® edoxaban calibrator. Using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), anti-Xa inhibitor drug concentrations were determined. Sensitivities and specificities to detect three clinically relevant drug concentrations (30 µgL^-1, 50 µgL^-1, 100 µgL^-1) were determined. Overall, 300 patients treated with rivaroxaban, 221 with apixaban, and 32 with edoxaban were included. The overall correlation coefficient (r_s) was 0.95 (95% CI 0.94, 0.96). An area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.96 for 30 µgL^-1, 0.98 for 50 µgL^-1, and 0.99 for 100 µgL^-1 was found. The sensitivities were 92.3% (95% CI 89.2, 94.6), 92.7% (89.4, 95.1), and 94.8% (91.1, 97.0), respectively (specificities 82.2%, 93.7%, and 94.4%). In conclusion, the clinical performance of a universal, edoxaban-calibrated anti-Xa assay was solid and most drug concentrations were predicted correctly.

Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with β-Thalassemia

Background. Patients with β-thalassemia have a high incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) and other supraventricular arrhythmias. The use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) for thromboembolic prophylaxis in patients with β-thalassemia has not been systematically evaluated. Methods. We enrolled patients with transfusion-dependent β-thalassemia, who were on treatment with NOACs for thromboembolic prophylaxis of supraventricular arrhythmias. Data on thromboembolic and bleeding events were collected. Results. Eighteen patients were enrolled. The patients had a history of AF (sixteen), typical atrial flutter (five), and atypical atrial flutter (four). The patients were treated with dabigatran (seven), apixaban (five), rivaroxaban (four) or edoxaban (two). The mean follow-up duration was 22 ± 15 months. No thromboembolic events were reported. No major bleedings were observed. Three patients had non-major bleeding events. Two patients reported dyspepsia during treatment with dabigatran and were shifted to a different NOAC. Conclusions. Our study suggests the efficacy and safety of NOACs in patients affected by transfusion-dependent β-thalassemia.

Drug-drug interactions with direct oral anticoagulants for the prevention of ischemic stroke and embolism in atrial fibrillation: a narrative review of adverse events

INTRODUCTION

In randomized trials, direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) were non-inferior to the vitamin-K-antagonist (VKA) warfarin in preventing stroke/embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). DOAC are substrates for P-glycoprotein (P-gp), CYP3A4 and CYP2C9. The activity of these enzymes is modulated by several drugs which might induce pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions (DDI). Drugs affecting platelet function have the potential for pharmacodynamic DDI of DOAC.

AREAS COVERED

The literature was searched for: 'dabigatran,' 'rivaroxaban,' 'edoxaban,' or 'apixaban' and drugs affecting platelet function, CYP3A4-, CYP2C9- or P-gp-activity. Reports about bleeding and embolic events attributed to DDI with DOAC in AF-patients were found for 43 of 171 drugs with interacting potential (25%), most frequently with antiplatelet and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Whereas a co-medication of platelet-affecting drugs is invariably reported to increase the bleeding risk, the findings regarding P-gp-, CYP3A4- and CYP2C9- activity-affecting drugs are ambiguous.

EXPERT OPINION

Tests for plasma DOAC-levels and information about DDI of DOAC should be widely available and user-friendly. If advantages and disadvantages of DOAC and VKA can be investigated exhaustively, individualized anticoagulant therapy can be offered to patients, considering co-medication, comorbidities, genetic and geographic factors and the health care system.

Direct Oral FXa Inhibitors Binding to Human Serum Albumin: Spectroscopic, Calorimetric, and Computational Studies

Direct FXa inhibitors are an important class of bioactive molecules (rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban, and betrixaban) applied for thromboprophylaxis in diverse cardiovascular pathologies. The interaction of active compounds with human serum albumin (HSA), the most abundant protein in blood plasma, is a key research area and provides crucial information about drugs' pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic properties. This research focuses on the study of the interactions between HSA and four commercially available direct oral FXa inhibitors, applying methodologies including steady-state and time-resolved fluorescence, isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC), and molecular dynamics. The HSA complexation of FXa inhibitors was found to occur via static quenching, and the complex formation in the ground states affects the fluorescence of HSA, with a moderate binding constant of 10⁴ M^-1. However, the ITC studies reported significantly different binding constants (10³ M^-1) compared with the results obtained through spectrophotometric methods. The suspected binding mode is supported by molecular dynamics simulations, where the predominant interactions were hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic interactions (mainly π-π stacking interactions between the phenyl ring of FXa inhibitors and the indole moiety of Trp214). Finally, the possible implications of the obtained results regarding pathologies such as hypoalbuminemia are briefly discussed.

Prescribing Patterns and Outcomes of Edoxaban in Atrial Fibrillation: One-Year Data from the Global ETNA-AF Program

Non-recommended dosing occurs in ~25-50% of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant prescriptions, with limited data for edoxaban. We analyzed edoxaban dosing patterns in atrial fibrillation patients from the Global ETNA-AF program, relating patterns to baseline characteristics and 1-year clinical outcomes. The following dosing groups were compared: non-recommended 60 mg ("overdosed") vs. recommended 30 mg; non-recommended 30 mg ("underdosed") vs. recommended 60 mg. Most (22,166/26,823; 82.6%) patients received recommended doses. Non-recommended dosing was more frequent near label-specified dose-reduction thresholds. Ischemic stroke (IS; HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.50-1.47; p = 0.6) and major bleeding (MB; HR 1.47, 95% CI 0.97-2.71; p = 0.07) did not differ between recommended 60 mg and "underdosed" groups, whereas all-cause (HR 1.61, 95% CI 1.23-2.08; p = 0.0003) and cardiovascular deaths (HR 1.61, 95% CI 1.11-2.38; p = 0.01) were higher in the "underdosed" group. Compared with recommended 30 mg, the "overdosed" group had lower IS (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.28-0.98; p = 0.04) and all-cause death (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.55-0.98; p = 0.03) without higher MB (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.46-1.22; p = 0.2). In conclusion: non-recommended dosing was infrequent, but more common near dose-reduction thresholds. "Underdosing" was not associated with better clinical outcomes. The "overdosed" group had lower IS and all-cause death without higher MB.

Evaluation of newly-developed modified diluted prothrombin time reagent in non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients with direct oral anticoagulants: A comparative study with conventional reagents

INTRODUCTION

A single assay to assess the effect of the direct FXa inhibitor is needed clinically because prothrombin (PT) assay is not yet sensitive enough for accurate evaluation. We developed modified diluted prothrombin time (mdPT) assay showing a high reactivity to direct FXa inhibitors based on prothrombin time (PT) reagent. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reactivity of mdPT to direct FXa inhibitors comparing to that of commercial PT reagents and diluted prothrombin time (dPT).

METHODS

The correlation and slopes of mdPT against the drug concentrations by anti-Xa assay were compared to those of the four commercial reagents of PT or dPT in 275, 257, and 243 clinical samples collected from non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients who are prescribed apixaban, edoxaban or rivaroxaban for stroke prevention, respectively.

RESULTS

The correlation coefficient (95% confidence interval) of mdPT against apixaban, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban was 0.818 (0.775-0.854), 0.914 (0.892-0.932), and 0.814 (0.766-0.852), respectively. The slope (95% confidence interval) of mdPT for apixaban, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban was 0.0068 (0.0063-0.0075), 0.0076 (0.0072-0.0080), and 0.0072 (0.0065-0.0078), respectively, which were higher than that of four commercial PT and dPT reagents, ranging within 0.0006-0.0023, 0.0017-0.0038, and 0.0016-0.0057 (all, p < 0.001), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Compared with other PT and dPT reagents, mdPT reagent showed sharper slope to all direct FXa inhibitors, and higher correlation to apixaban and comparable correlation to edoxaban and rivaroxaban. This new reagent is expected to be a coagulation screening assay having a consistently high response to any types of direct FXa inhibitors.

Prediction and Implications of Edoxaban-Associated Bleeding in Patients after Critical Illness

In this retrospective study, we aimed to identify the risk factors for bleeding in patients after critical illness during edoxaban treatment. Data from patients who received edoxaban after critical illness at the Emergency Department at a tertiary care hospital were obtained from the hospital medical records. Multivariate analysis revealed the risk factors for edoxaban-associated bleeding. Additionally, we developed an edoxaban-associated bleeding score (EAB score) based on these results. The derived EAB score was compared with the HAS-BLED score using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Bleeding was observed in 42 of 114 patients (36.8%). We identified the following bleeding predictors (odds ratios, 95% confidence interval, score points) using multivariate analysis: concomitant use of antiplatelet agents (6.759, 2.047-22.32, 2 points), concomitant use of P-glycoprotein inhibitors (3.825, 1.484-9.856, 1 point), prothrombin time (PT)% following edoxaban administration of <75% and ≥60% (2.507, 0.788-7.970, 1 point), and PT% following edoxaban administration of <60% (11.23, 3.560-35.42, 3 points). The ROC curve analysis revealed an area under the curve of 0.826 for the EAB score and 0.625 for the HAS-BLED score. Under appropriate edoxaban dosing regimens in patients after critical illness, a combination of antiplatelet agents, P-gp inhibitors, and a low PT% following edoxaban administration were identified as strong risk factors for bleeding.

Efficacy and Safety of Renal Function on Edoxaban Versus Warfarin for Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Edoxaban is a novel oral anticoagulant which may decrease the risk of stroke and systemic embolism in patients suffering from atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the decreased efficacy of edoxaban versus warfarin for the avoidance of stroke and systemic embolism in AF with creatinine clearance (CrCl) > 95 mL/min has been reported. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to further clarify the safety (major bleeding) and efficacy (stroke or systemic embolism) of edoxaban for AF patients with various CrCl. Methods: A systematic search of studies on edoxaban and warfarin in AF patients related to renal function was conducted in PubMed, Medline, Web of Science databases, EBSCO, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. In this meta-analysis (protocol number: PROSPERO CRD 42021245512), we included studies that provide specific data on three outcomes: ischemic stroke or systemic embolism (S/SE), bleeding, and all-cause mortality. Results: This meta-analysis enrolled two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) studies and two retrospective studies that enrolled 28,065 patients. According to CrCl, subjects are divided into three groups (CrCl 30−50 mL/min, CrCl 50−95 mL/min, CrCl > 95 mL/min). In AF patients with CrCl 30−50 mL/min, edoxaban 30 mg daily is similar to warfarin in the prevention of ischemic S/SE and all-cause mortality, resulting in lower bleeding rate and better net clinical outcome (ischemic S/SE: hazard ratio (HR), 0.85, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.19−1.87; all-cause mortality: HR, 0.65, 95% CI, 0.35−1.19; bleeding: HR, 0.75, 95% CI, 0.60−0.93; net clinical outcome: HR, 0.75, 95% CI, 0.63−0.90). In the group of CrCl 50−95 mL/min, the net clinical outcome was more favorable with edoxaban 60 mg daily than warfarin (HR, 0.81, 95% CI: 0.68−0.96), and there was no significant difference between edoxaban 60 mg daily and warfarin in terms of prevention of bleeding, ischemic S/SE, and all-cause mortality. For AF patients with CrCl > 95 mL/min, there was a statistically significant difference in lower bleeding rate between edoxaban 60 mg daily and warfarin (bleeding: HR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.58−0.84). There was no differential safety in ischemic S/SE, all-cause mortality, and net clinical outcome. Conclusion: Overall, edoxaban was superior to warfarin in terms of net clinical outcome in various groups of CrCl with AF patients. Although there was no significant difference in net clinical outcome between edoxaban and warfarin for AF patients with CrCl > 95 mL/min, edoxaban is not inferior to warfarin in safety and effectiveness in the various levels of CrCl. Edoxaban may be a more effective and safe treatment than warfarin for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) who require anticoagulation. More high-quality and long-term clinical research are needed to further estimate the effects of edoxaban.

Edoxaban, a Factor Xa-Specific Direct Oral Anticoagulant, Significantly Suppresses Tumor Growth in Colorectal Cancer Colon26-Inoculated BALB/c Mice

Introduction  Certain low-molecular-weight heparins have been reported to reduce tumor growth and metastasis in tumor cell-inoculated mouse models and cancer patients. Recently, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been widely used in patients with thromboembolism. This study was aimed at investigating the effect of DOACs, which target thrombin or factor Xa, on tumor growth in a syngeneic mouse model comprising BALB/c mice inoculated with colon cancer Colon26 cells. Materials and Methods  DOACs targeting thrombin (dabigatran etexilate [DABE]) or factor Xa (rivaroxaban [RVX] and edoxaban [EDX]) were orally administered daily to male BALB/c mice inoculated with Colon26 cells, followed by analyses of tumor growth and plasma levels of coagulation- and tumor-related factors such as tissue factor (TF), plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2). Results  Colon26 cells expressed significant amounts of functionally active TF. Tumor growth in Colon26-inoculated mice was significantly suppressed in DABE- or RVX-treated mice ( p <0.05) and was suppressed more significantly in EDX-treated mice ( p <0.01). Therefore, the antitumor mechanism of action of EDX was investigated next. Plasma levels of TF, PAI-1, IL-6, and MMP-2 were elevated in Colon26-inoculated mice but were significantly reduced in EDX-treated mice ( p <0.01). The expression of protease-activated receptor (PAR)1, PAR2, signal transducer and activator of transcription-3 (STAT3), cyclin D1, and Ki67 was increased in tumor tissue of Colon26-inoculated mice but (except for PAR1) was significantly decreased in tumor tissues of EDX-treated mice ( p <0.01). In addition, apoptotic cells and p53 protein levels were significantly increased in tumor tissues of EDX-treated mice. Conclusion  The data suggest that among the tested DOACs, EDX significantly suppresses tumor cell proliferation via the factor Xa-PAR2 pathway, which is activated by coagulation and inflammation in Colon26-inoculated mice and induces tumor cell apoptosis.

Comparison of the Treatment Persistence Among 4 Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: A 5-Year Retrospective Cohort Study

Four direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are used in Japan (edoxaban, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and dabigatran); however, few studies have examined the long-term treatment persistence of these DOACs. Furthermore, the factors associated with persistence remain unclear. This single-center, retrospective cohort study enrolled participants who were newly prescribed the 4 DOACs between January 1, 2012, and April 30, 2020. We assessed the treatment persistence rate by calculating the cumulative incidence rate of prescription switch or discontinuation for 5 years from the initial prescription. The factors associated with persistence were examined using multivariate analysis. The edoxaban was used as a reference for comparison with the other DOACs. The persistence rate at 5 years was 52.9% for all DOACs, including 67.0%, 51.6%, 50.2%, and 37.0% for edoxaban, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and dabigatran, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that age >65 years (hazard ratio [HR], 0.62 [95%CI, 0.41-0.93]), chronic kidney disease (HR, 1.63 [95%CI, 1.11-2.39]), baseline hemoglobin (HR, 0.85 [95%CI, 0.78-0.93]), diabetes mellitus (HR, 0.51 [95%CI, 0.29-0.93]), and type of DOACs (rivaroxaban: HR, 1.81 [95%CI, 1.03-3.18]; apixaban: HR, 2.00 [95%CI, 1.15-3.48]; and dabigatran: HR, 2.84 [95%CI, 1.66-4.86]) were significantly associated with nonpersistence at 1 year. At 5 years, diabetes mellitus (HR, 0.60 [95%CI, 0.37-0.97]) and type of DOAC were significantly associated with nonpersistence (rivaroxaban: HR, 1.79 [95%CI, 1.09-2.94]; apixaban: HR, 2.04 [95%CI, 1.26-3.31]; and dabigatran: HR, 2.76 [1.73-4.42]). Long-term treatment persistence differed according to the type of DOAC, with edoxaban exhibiting the highest level of persistence. The factors associated with persistence may change over the treatment course, but larger studies are required to generalize our findings.

Edoxaban Versus Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

OBJECTIVE

During the first wave of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, management of anticoagulation therapy in hospitalized patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) was simplified to low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) followed by oral anticoagulation, mainly owing to the risk of drug-drug interactions. However, not all oral anticoagulants carry the same risk.

METHODS

Observational, retrospective, and multicenter study that consecutively included hospitalized patients with AF anticoagulated with LMWH followed by oral anticoagulation or edoxaban concomitantly with empirical COVID-19 therapy. Time-to-event (mortality, total bleeds, and admissions to ICU) curves, using an unadjusted Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression model adjusted for potential confounders were constructed.

RESULTS

A total of 232 patients were included (80.3 ± 7.7 years, 50.0% men, CHA₂DS₂-VASc 4.1 ± 1.4; HAS-BLED 2.6 ± 1.0). During hospitalization, patients were taking azithromycin (98.7%), hydroxychloroquine (89.7%), and ritonavir/lopinavir (81.5%). The mean length of hospital stay was 14.6 ± 7.2 days, and total follow-up was 31.6 ± 13.4 days; 12.9% of patients required admission to ICU, 18.5% died, and 9.9% had a bleeding complication (34.8% major bleeding). Length of hospital stay was longer in patients taking LMWH (16.0 ± 7.7 vs 13.3 ± 6.5 days; P = .005), but mortality and total bleeds were similar in patients treated with edoxaban and those treated with LMWH followed by oral anticoagulation.

CONCLUSIONS

Mortality rates, arterial and venous thromboembolic complications, and bleeds did not significantly differ between AF patients receiving anticoagulation therapy with edoxaban or LMWH followed by oral anticoagulation. However, the duration of hospitalization was significantly lower with edoxaban. Edoxaban had a similar therapeutic profile to LMWH followed by oral anticoagulation and may provide additional benefits.

Predictive Factors and Clinical Events Associated with Edoxaban Interruption and Heparin Bridging Strategy: EMIT-AF/VTE

Patients treated with edoxaban may require diagnostic and therapeutic procedures that involve edoxaban interruption. Although heparin bridging strategies are not recommended, heparin is frequently used in clinical practice. However, whether heparin use decreases thromboembolic risk remains unclear, and the potential for increased periprocedural bleeding remains a concern. Here, we report factors predicting edoxaban interruption and the use of heparin bridging strategies and associated clinical events from Global EMIT-AF/VTE, a multicenter, prospective, noninterventional study (Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02950168). Eligible patients are adults with atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism treated with edoxaban who underwent a diagnostic or therapeutic procedure. Edoxaban interruption, heparin bridging strategies, and clinical event data were collected from 5 days before procedure through 29 days afterwards. Edoxaban was interrupted in 1222/2089 procedures (58.5%); a heparin bridging strategy was used during 178 (14.6%) of these interruptions. Patients who received periprocedural heparin had higher baseline HAS-BLED (2.4±1.0 vs 1.9±1.1, P <0.0001) scores and similar CHA2DS2-VASc (3.6±1.6 vs 3.4±1.6, P = 0.09) scores versus patients who did not. HAS-BLED score >3 and high EHRA procedural risk predicted both edoxaban interruption and the use of a heparin bridging strategy, whereas CHA2DS2-VASc scores did not predict either. Bleeding and ischemic event rates were low; the all-bleeding rate was higher with the use of a heparin bridging strategy versus without (6.2% vs 3.1%, P = 0.04). Periprocedural heparin use was associated with higher bleeding rates, but not with lower thromboembolic risk. Individual patient and procedural bleeding risks appear to contribute more than stroke risk to clinicians' consideration of a heparin bridging strategy.

Feasibility, effectiveness, and safety of edoxaban administration through percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: 12-months follow up of the ORIGAMI study

Background and aims

Edoxaban proved to be safe and effective also in fragile patients, but its administration through percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) has not been previously investigated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and the preliminary safety and efficacy profiles of edoxaban administered via PEG in patients with an indication for long-term oral anticoagulation.

Methods

ORIGAMI was a prospective, single-arm, observational study (NCT04271293). Patients with PEG and an indication for long-term anticoagulation were prospectively enrolled. Crushed edoxaban at approved doses was administered via PEG. The primary endpoint was the composite of cardio-embolic events consisting of ischemic stroke, systemic embolism, or symptomatic deep venous thrombosis/pulmonary embolism (DVT/PE). Secondary endpoints were the number of bleeding events and edoxaban plasma concentrations at steady state. We here report the 12-month results.

Results

A total of 12 patients were enrolled. The main indication for PEG implantation was amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (10/12). The primary endpoint of cardio-embolic events did not occur in any patients at 12 months. All patients were in the therapeutic range of steady-state edoxaban plasma levels. Three minor bleedings were observed, while no major bleedings occurred during the observational period. A total of five patients died. All deaths were from non-cardiovascular causes and were consistent with the natural history of the pre-existing severe disease.

Conclusion

Our study suggests that edoxaban administration via PEG is feasible and appears safe and effective in fragile, comorbid patients, resulting in therapeutic plasma concentrations of edoxaban.

Clinical trial registration

[ClinicalTrials.gov], identifier [NCT04271293].

Bioequivalence and Pharmacokinetic Study of 2 Edoxaban Tablets in Healthy Chinese Subjects

The aim was to investigate the bioequivalence of 2 orally administered edoxaban 60-mg tablets and the food effects on the pharmacokinetics of edoxaban. Sixty-four healthy Chinese subjects participated in this open-label, randomized, 2-sequence, 4-period, crossover study. All subjects randomly received 60-mg generic (test) or branded (reference) edoxaban tablet in each period. Plasma edoxaban concentrations were determined using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The pharmacokinetic parameters maximum concentration (C_max ) and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) were compared to assess bioequivalence. The geometric least-squares mean ratios for C_max , AUC from time 0 to the last measurable time point (AUC_0-t ), and AUC from time 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUC_0-∞ ) were 97.0%, 95.4%, and 96.1%, respectively, in the fasting test, and 98.6%, 100.0%, and 99.8%, respectively, in the fed test. Food increased exposure and prolonged the time to maximum concentration of edoxaban. Both formulations displayed comparable safety profiles, with no serious adverse events reported. The 2 products of edoxaban tablets are bioequivalent and safe in healthy Chinese volunteers. Food may have a modest effect on the pharmacokinetic properties of edoxaban.

The importance of renal function in anemic patients treated with edoxaban after orthopedic surgery in a real-world clinical setting: A retrospective study

Edoxaban (Edx) has been approved to prevent venous thromboembolism after total knee and/or hip arthroplasty in Japan. However, the risk of anemia with Edx treatment remains elusive. No risk factors for Edx-associated anemia after orthopedic surgery have been reported. This study aimed to clarify the risk of anemia associated with Edx treatment and determine the risk factors for Edx-associated anemia after orthopedic surgery with a high risk for bleeding. First, the association between Edx treatment and the incidence of anemia-related events was retrospectively investigated by pharmacovigilance analyses using data from 5769,866 reports between the first quarters of 2016 and 2020 in the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System and 2752,050 reports between the fourth quarters of 2011 and 2019 in the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report. Second, 221 patients who underwent Edx treatment after total knee and/or hip arthroplasty between July 2011 and June 2012 at a single center were included in a case-control study to clarify the risk factors for anemia. Edx treatment was associated with an increased risk of anemia-related events in orthopedic patients. Reduced renal function was identified as a critical risk factor for Edx-associated anemia after orthopedic surgery. The present study indicates that renal function should be considered in the risk management of increased Edx-associated anemia after orthopedic surgery.

The Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants versus Standard of Care in Patients without an Indication of Anti-Coagulants after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is now considered the mainstay of aortic stenosis management; however, the optimal antithrombotic therapy in patent without indications for an oral anticoagulant (OAC) is yet to be identified. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) treatment versus the standard of care in patients without indications of OACs after TAVR. We synthesized randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from Web of Science, SCOPUS, EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane until 18 August 2022. We used the risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). We registered our protocol in PROSPERO with ID: CRD42022357027. Three RCTs with 2922 patients were identified. DOACs were significantly associated with higher incidence of all-cause mortality (RR: 1.68 with 95% CI [1.22, 2.30], p = 0.001), mortality due to non-cardiovascular causes (RR: 2.34 with 95% CI [1.36, 4.02], p = 0.002), and the composite outcome of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke (RR: 1.41 with 95% CI [1.13, 1.76], p = 0.002). However, DOACs were associated with decreased incidence of reduced leaflet motion (RLM) (RR: 0.19 with 95% CI [0.09, 0.41], p = 0.0001) and hypoattenuated leaflet thickening (HALT) (RR: 0.50 with 95% CI [0.36, 0.70], p = 0.0001). DOACs were effective to reduce RLM and HALT; however, the clinical effect of this is still controversial. DOACs were associated with worse efficacy and safety outcomes, including all-cause mortality. Further RCTs investigating the optimal antithrombotic regimen after TAVR.

Gastrointestinal Bleeding Due to NOACs Use: Exploring the Molecular Mechanisms

Novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are drugs approved for the prevention and treatment of many thromboembolic cardiovascular conditions as a safer alternative to warfarin. We reviewed studies published in PubMed^®, UpToDate^®, Web of Science^®, and Cochrane^® about NOACs' risks and benefits in patients requiring anticoagulation, with a focus on gastrointestinal bleeding and on molecular and pathophysiological mechanisms underlying the risk of bleeding in patients treated with them. Apixaban resulted in a lower rate of gastrointestinal bleeding compared to dabigatran and rivaroxaban. However, data reported that gastrointestinal bleeding in patients treated with NOACs was less severe compared to warfarin. Studies show promising results on the increased and widespread use of NOACs in patients who require anticoagulation (for example-in case of atrial fibrillation or high risk of venous thromboembolism), reporting an overall lower risk of major bleeding events. The profile of NOACs was more effective and secure compared to warfarin, but a more careful medical prescription is required in patients who are at high risk of gastrointestinal bleeding.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants for the Prevention and Acute Treatment of Cancer-Associated Thrombosis

Cancer is a major risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE), and cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) constitutes approximately 15-25% of all VTE cases. For decades, the standard treatment for CAT used to be daily subcutaneous low molecular weight heparin (LMWH). Data on the safety and efficacy of the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in this population emerged only in recent years and specific DOACs were included into recent guidelines recommendations. In this narrative review of the literature, we reported the results of the phase III randomized controlled trials that evaluated the DOACs for the prevention and the acute treatment of CAT. For the acute phase treatment, the anti-Xa inhibitors (apixaban, edoxaban, rivaroxaban) showed better efficacy than LMWH in preventing VTE recurrence; however, rivaroxaban and edoxaban were also associated with an increased risk of bleeding events. For primary prevention of CAT in ambulatory cancer patients starting chemotherapy, apixaban and rivaroxaban showed better efficacy than placebo but a trend towards higher bleeding rates. Recent guidelines suggest the DOACs for the treatment of CAT in selected cancer patients (eg, low bleeding risk, no luminal gastrointestinal or genitourinary malignancies, no interfering medications). The DOACs are also suggested for primary thromboprophylaxis in selected ambulatory cancer patients at high risk of VTE (eg, Khorana score ≥2 prior to starting new chemotherapy, low bleeding risk, no interfering medications).

Evaluation of bleeding and anticoagulation markers by edoxaban and low-dose cyclosporine: A case series study

It was reported that high-dose cyclosporine at 500 mg daily increases edoxaban exposure. We investigated whether cyclosporine <500 mg daily leads to edoxaban-induced bleeding in the clinical setting. This case series study included patients receiving edoxaban and cyclosporine at Mie University Hospital. The outcomes were bleeding and anticoagulant markers, including activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), prothrombin time (PT), and the international normalized ratio of prothrombin time (PT-INR). We examined the genotypes of cytochrome P450 3A5 (CYP3A5), multidrug resistance 1 (ABCB1), and solute carrier organic anion transporter 1B1 (SLCO1B1). Trends in anticoagulant markers were analyzed. Thirteen patients received edoxaban (standard dose; n = 3 and reduced dose; n = 10) and cyclosporine (1.94 ± 1.42 mg/kg). A bleeding event occurred in one patient receiving a standard dose of edoxaban plus cyclosporine of 25 mg daily (HAS-BLED score of 2 and genotypes; CYP3A5*3/*3, ABCB1 3435CT, and SLCO1B1*1a/*1b). After edoxaban treatment, anticoagulant markers were prolonged (APTT; 27.95 ± 3.64 seconds vs. 31.11 ± 3.90 seconds, p<0.001, PT; 11.53 ± 1.01 seconds vs. 13.03 ± 0.98 seconds, p = 0.002, PT-INR; 0.98 ± 0.09 vs. 1.11 ± 0.11, p = 0.007). In summary, the genotypes of CYP3A5, ABCB1, and SLCO1B1 and the dosage of edoxaban may affect the risk of bleeding by edoxaban when co-administered with cyclosporine, even at low doses. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

warfarin: insights from ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48

AIMS

In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), peripheral artery disease (PAD) is associated with higher rates of stroke and bleeding. Both higher dose edoxaban (60/30 mg) and lower dose edoxaban (30/15 mg) were non-inferior to warfarin for stroke and systemic embolism (SSE) and significantly reduced major bleeding in AF patients in the global study to assess the safety and effectiveness of edoxaban vs standard practice of dosing with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation (ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48) trial. Whether the efficacy and safety of these dosing strategies vs. warfarin are consistent in patients with AF and PAD has not been described.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Of 21 105 patients with AF randomized to warfarin, edoxaban 60/30 mg, or edoxaban 30/15 mg, 841 were identified with PAD. Endpoints included major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), SSE, and major bleeding. Patients with PAD had higher risk of MACEs [adjusted hazard ratio (HRadj) 1.33, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12-1.57, P = 0.001] and cardiovascular (CV) death (HRadj 1.49, 95% CI 1.21-1.83, P &lt; 0.001) than those without PAD, but not major bleeding. The efficacy of edoxaban 60/30 mg vs. warfarin was consistent regardless of PAD (SSE HR; PAD 1.16, 95% CI 0.42-3.20; no-PAD 0.86, 95% CI 0.74-1.02, P-interaction 0.57) as was major bleeding (PAD 0.96, 95% CI 0.54-1.70; no-PAD 0.80, 95% CI 0.70-0.91, P-interaction 0.54). Edoxaban 30/15 mg was inferior for SSE, with significant heterogeneity when stratified by PAD status (P-interaction 0.039).

CONCLUSION

Patients with AF and PAD are at heightened risk of MACEs and CV death vs. those without PAD. The efficacy and safety of edoxaban 60/30 mg vs. warfarin in AF are consistent regardless of PAD; however, edoxaban 30/15 mg is inferior for stroke prevention in AF patients with PAD. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00781391.

Laboratory Test Predictors for Major Bleeding in Elderly (≥80 Years) Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Treated With Edoxaban 15 mg: Sub-Analysis of the ELDERCARE-AF Trial

Background

We investigated the predictors related to major bleeding events during treatment with edoxaban 15 mg in patients aged ≥80 years with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and high bleeding risk, for whom standard oral anticoagulants are inappropriate, focusing on standard laboratory tests related to bleeding.

Methods and Results

This was a prespecified subanalysis of the on‐treatment analysis set of the ELDERCARE‐AF (Edoxaban Low‐Dose for Elder Care Atrial Fibrillation Patients) trial. Major bleeding was the primary safety end point. The event rates were calculated according to prespecified characteristics at baseline. A total of 984 Japanese patients were randomly assigned to edoxaban 15 mg or placebo (n=492, each). During the study period, 20 and 11 major bleeding events occurred in the edoxaban and placebo groups, respectively. The adjusted analysis revealed that hemoglobin <12.3 g/dL (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 3.57 [95% CI, 1.10–11.55]) and prothrombin time ≥12.7 seconds; (aHR, 2.89 [95% CI, 1.05–8.02]) independently predicted major bleeding, while creatinine clearance <30 mL/min showed a tendency towards an increase in major bleeding (aHR, 2.68; 95% CI, 0.96–7.46). In patients treated with edoxaban lacking these 3 risk factors, no major bleeding occurred; major bleeding event rates increased with each risk factor. Patients with 3 risk factors were significantly more likely to have a major bleeding event at 11.05%/year (HR, 7.15 [95% CI, 1.92–26.71]).

Conclusions

In elderly patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation with high bleeding risk, baseline hemoglobin <12.3 g/dL, prothrombin time ≥12.7 seconds, and creatinine clearance <30 mL/min may predict major bleeding during treatment with edoxaban 15 mg.

Registration

URL: ELDERCARE‐AF https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique number: NCT02801669.

Impact of comparative effectiveness research on Medicare coverage of direct oral anticoagulants

Aim: To evaluate the association of comparative effectiveness research with Medicare coverage of direct oral anticoagulants. Materials & methods: A literature review for direct oral anticoagulants was conducted from 2011 to 2017. Monthly prescription drug plan and formulary files (n = 28) were used to conduct change-point analysis and assess each outcome variable. Results: Up to 2013, studies showed that dabigatran was more effective than rivaroxaban. In 2015, apixaban was shown to be the safest and most effective drug in comparison with all direct oral anticoagulants. In 2016-2017, dabigatran and apixaban were shown to have similar efficacy. Approximately 75% of plans covered dabigatran under tier 3 until 2015. From 2011 to 2017, less than 30% of plans required prior authorizations, 50% imposed quantity limits and mean copayment was lowest for rivaroxaban. Conclusion: Consistent with comparative effectiveness research, Medicare plans covered apixaban more favorably and edoxaban less favorably. However, discrepancies in comparative effectiveness research translation were found for rivaroxaban and dabigatran.

Comparative effectiveness and safety of edoxaban, rivaroxaban, and apixaban in patients with venous thromboembolism: A cohort study

BACKGROUND

Although several studies have compared the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban and apixaban in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE), direct comparison of these drugs with edoxaban is lacking.

OBJECTIVE

We compared the effectiveness and safety of edoxaban, rivaroxaban, and apixaban in patients with VTE.

PATIENTS/METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study using a Japanese hospital administrative database, we identified three mutually exclusive groups of patients with VTE beginning treatment with edoxaban, rivaroxaban, or apixaban. Primary effectiveness outcome was recurrent VTE, and principal safety outcome was a composite of intracranial hemorrhage and gastrointestinal bleeding. Subjects were followed for up to 180 days. Baseline characteristics among groups were balanced using propensity score matching weights.

RESULTS

Three thousand three hundred sixty-nine edoxaban, 1592 rivaroxaban, and 1998 apixaban initiators were identified. There were no significant differences among the three drugs in the prevention of recurrent VTE (adjusted incidence rate ratio [aIRR], 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45-1.30 for edoxaban vs. rivaroxaban; aIRR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.54-1.56 for edoxaban vs. apixaban; and aIRR, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.69-2.10 for rivaroxaban vs. apixaban), or in the risk of intracranial hemorrhage or gastrointestinal bleeding (aIRR, 1.57, 95% CI, 0.85-2.90 for edoxaban vs. rivaroxaban; aIRR, 1.30, 95% CI, 0.76-2.23 for edoxaban vs. apixaban; and aIRR, 0.83, 95% CI, 0.42-1.64 for rivaroxaban vs. apixaban).

CONCLUSIONS

In routine care, edoxaban, rivaroxaban, and apixaban appear to have similar effectiveness and safety in the treatment of VTE.