Management of portal vein thrombosis in liver cirrhosis

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a fairly common complication of liver cirrhosis. Importantly, occlusive PVT might influence the prognosis of patients with cirrhosis. Evidence from a randomized controlled trial has shown that anticoagulation can prevent the occurrence of PVT in patients with cirrhosis without prior PVT. Evidence from several case series has also demonstrated that anticoagulation can achieve portal vein recanalization in patients with cirrhosis and PVT. Early initiation of anticoagulation therapy and absence of previous portal hypertensive bleeding might be positively associated with a high rate of portal vein recanalization after anticoagulation. However, the possibility of spontaneous resolution of partial PVT questions the necessity of anticoagulation for the treatment of partial PVT. In addition, a relatively low recanalization rate of complete PVT after anticoagulation therapy suggests its limited usefulness in patients with complete PVT. Successful insertion of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) not only recanalizes the thrombosed portal vein, but also relieves the symptomatic portal hypertension. However, the technical difficulty of TIPS potentially limits its widespread application, and the risk and benefits should be fully balanced. Notably, current recommendations regarding the management of PVT in liver cirrhosis are insufficient owing to low-quality evidence.

Anticoagulation for the treatment of portal vein thrombosis in liver cirrhosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of anticoagulation for the treatment of portal vein thrombosis (PVT) in cirrhotic patients.

METHODS

The PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and ScienceDirect databases were searched. The rates of bleeding complications and portal vein recanalization in patients who received anticoagulant therapy were pooled. The odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated to express the difference in the rate of portal vein recanalization between anticoagulation and non-anticoagulation groups. All meta-analyses were conducted by using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Sixteen of 960 initially identified papers were included. Two studies reported a low incidence of major anticoagulation-related complications (4% [2/55] and 3% [1/33]), but no lethal complications occurred. The rate of anticoagulation-related bleeding ranged from 0% to 18% with a pooled rate of 3.3% (95% CI=1.1%-6.7%). The heterogeneity was not significant in the meta-analysis. The total rate of portal vein recanalization ranged from 37% to 93% with a pooled rate of 66.6% (95% CI=54.7%-77.6%). The rate of complete portal vein recanalization ranged from 0% to 75% with a pooled rate of 41.5% (95% CI=29.2%-54.5%). However, the heterogeneity was significant in the 2 meta-analyses. The rate of complete portal vein recanalization was significantly higher in anticoagulation group than in non-anticoagulation group (OR=4.16, 95% CI=1.88-9.20, P=0.0004). The heterogeneity was not significant in the meta-analysis.

CONCLUSION

Anticoagulation could achieve a relatively high rate of portal vein recanalization in cirrhotic patients with PVT. Given that only a small number of non-randomized comparative studies are reported, randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm the risk-to-benefit of anticoagulation in such patients, especially anticoagulation-related bleeding.

Associations of coagulation factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A mutations with Budd-Chiari syndrome and portal vein thrombosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the associations of the coagulation factor V (encoded by F5) Leiden (FVL) or prothrombin (encoded by F2) G20210A mutation with Budd-Chiari syndrome or portal vein thrombosis (PVT).

METHODS

Relevant articles were identified in searches of the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and ScienceDirect databases. The prevalence of the FVL and prothrombin G20210A mutations were compared between patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome or PVT without cirrhosis and healthy individuals (controls) and between patients with cirrhosis, with and without PVT. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.

RESULTS

We initially identified 869 articles, and included 27 in our final analysis. Compared with controls, patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome had a significantly higher prevalence of the FVL mutation (OR, 6.21; 95% CI, 3.93-9.79) and a similar prevalence of the prothrombin G20210A mutation (OR, 1.90; 95% CI, 0.69-5.23); patients with PVT without cirrhosis had a significantly higher prevalence of the FVL mutation (OR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.09-3.13) or the prothrombin G20210A mutation (OR, 5.01; 95% CI, 3.03-8.30). Compared with patients with cirrhosis without PVT, patients with cirrhosis and PVT had a significantly higher prevalence of the FVL mutation (OR, 2.55; 95% CI, 1.29-5.07). We observed a trend toward a higher prevalence of the prothrombin G20210A mutation in patients with cirrhosis and PVT, but the difference was not statistically significant (OR, 2.93; 95% CI, 0.94-9.07).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on a meta-analysis, the FVL mutation is associated with an increased risk of Budd-Chiari syndrome, PVT without cirrhosis, and PVT in cirrhosis. The prothrombin G20210A mutation is associated with PVT, but not Budd-Chiari syndrome. Studies are needed to confirm these findings in different racial and ethnic groups.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for portal cavernoma with symptomatic portal hypertension in non-cirrhotic patients

BACKGROUND

Portal cavernoma is regarded as a contraindication to transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS).

AIM

To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of TIPS for symptomatic portal hypertension in non-cirrhotic patients with portal cavernoma.

METHODS

Between July 2002 and December 2009, 46 consecutive non-cirrhotic patients with portal cavernoma were admitted to our center. Twenty patients presented with variceal rebleeding (n = 20) and refractory ascites (n = 1), and were treated with TIPS. They were followed until either death or July 2010. Data were compared using the Fisher's exact test or t test.

RESULTS

TIPS were successfully placed in 35% (7/20) of patients via a transjugular approach alone (n = 1), a combined transjugular/transhepatic approach (n = 4), and a combined transjugular/transsplenic approach (n = 2). TIPS were inserted in a large collateral vein in two patients in whom recanalization of the occluded main portal vein was impossible. Procedure-related complication was hepatic capsule perforation in one patient who was cured by medical therapy alone. Shunt dysfunction occurred in two patients, but TIPS revision was failed in one of them. Portosystemic pressure gradient was significantly reduced in TIPS success group (26.3 ± 1.1 vs. 12.4 ± 1.1 mmHg, p < 0.001). The incidence of variceal bleeding in TIPS success group is lower than that in TIPS failure group (14 vs. 69%, p = 0.057). In TIPS success group, two patients died of systemic infection and accident, respectively. In TIPS failure group, two patients died of liver failure.

CONCLUSIONS

TIPS procedures are feasible and safe in selected patients with portal cavernoma. Successful TIPS insertions may decrease the incidence of variceal rebleeding.

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio for the prognostic assessment of hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is an inflammatory-based marker. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to explore the prognostic role of NLR in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

RESULTS

Overall, 598 papers were identified, of which 90 papers including 20,475 HCC patients were finally included. Low baseline NLR was significantly associated with better overall survival (HR = 1.80, 95% CI: 1.59-2.04, p < 0.00001) and recurrence-free or disease-free survival (HR = 2.23, 95% CI: 1.80-2.76, p < 0.00001). Low post- treatment NLR was significantly associated with better overall survival (HR = 1.90, 95% CI: 1.22-2.94, p = 0.004). Decreased NLR was significantly associated with overall survival (HR = 2.23, 95%CI: 1.83-2.72, p < 0.00001) and recurrence-free or disease-free survival (HR = 2.23, 95% CI: 1.83-2.72, p < 0.00001). The findings from most of subgroup meta-analyses were consistent with those from the overall meta-analyses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All relevant literatures were identified via PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library databases. Hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (95%CI) was calculated. Subgroup meta-analyses were performed according to the treatment options, NLR cut-off value ranges, and regions.

CONCLUSIONS

NLR should be a major prognostic factor for HCC patients. NLR might be further incorporated into the prognostic model of HCC.

Find duplicates among the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library Databases in systematic review

BACKGROUND

Finding duplicates is an important phase of systematic review. However, no consensus regarding the methods to find duplicates has been provided. This study aims to describe a pragmatic strategy of combining auto- and hand-searching duplicates in systematic review and to evaluate the prevalence and characteristics of duplicates.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

Literatures regarding portal vein thrombosis (PVT) and Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) were searched by the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library databases. Duplicates included one index paper and one or more redundant papers. They were divided into type-I (duplicates among different databases) and type-II (duplicate publications in different journals/issues) duplicates. For type-I duplicates, reference items were further compared between index and redundant papers. Of 10936 papers regarding PVT, 2399 and 1307 were identified as auto- and hand-searched duplicates, respectively. The prevalence of auto- and hand-searched redundant papers was 11.0% (1201/10936) and 6.1% (665/10936), respectively. They included 3431 type-I and 275 type-II duplicates. Of 11403 papers regarding BCS, 3275 and 2064 were identified as auto- and hand-searched duplicates, respectively. The prevalence of auto- and hand-searched redundant papers was 14.4% (1640/11403) and 9.1% (1039/11403), respectively. They included 5053 type-I and 286 type-II duplicates. Most of type-I duplicates were identified by auto-searching method (69.5%, 2385/3431 in PVT literatures; 64.6%, 3263/5053 in BCS literatures). Nearly all type-II duplicates were identified by hand-searching method (94.9%, 261/275 in PVT literatures; 95.8%, 274/286 in BCS literatures). Compared with those identified by auto-searching method, type-I duplicates identified by hand-searching method had a significantly higher prevalence of wrong items (47/2385 versus 498/1046, p<0.0001 in PVT literatures; 30/3263 versus 778/1790, p<0.0001 in BCS literatures). Most of wrong items originated from EMBASE database.

CONCLUSION

Given the inadequacy of a single strategy of auto-searching method, a combined strategy of auto- and hand-searching methods should be employed to find duplicates in systematic review.

Prevalence of inherited antithrombin, protein C, and protein S deficiencies in portal vein system thrombosis and Budd-Chiari syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The prevalence of inherited antithrombin (AT), protein C (PC), and protein S (PS) deficiencies in portal vein system thrombosis (PVST) and Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) are substantially varied in different studies. No quantitative syntheses of these studies have been performed. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to examine the prevalence of inherited AT, PC, and PS deficiencies in these patients and to compare the prevalence with healthy subjects.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were employed to identify all studies in which inherited AT, PC, and PS deficiencies in PVST and/or BCS were evaluated by family study or gene analysis. Prevalence and odds ratios of these inherited deficiencies were pooled; heterogeneity among studies was evaluated.

RESULTS

Nine studies were included in our meta-analysis. The pooled prevalence of inherited AT, PC, and PS deficiencies were 3.9%, 5.6%, and 2.6% in PVST, and 2.3%, 3.8%, and 3.0% in BCS, respectively. Heterogeneity among studies was not significant except for the analysis of inherited PC deficiency in BCS. Three studies compared the prevalence of these inherited deficiencies between PVST patients and healthy subjects. The pooled odds ratios of inherited AT, PC, and PS deficiencies for PVST patients were 8.89 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.34-33.72, P = 0.0011), 17.63 (95% CI 1.97-158.21, P = 0.0032), and 8.00 (95% CI 1.61-39.86, P = 0.011), respectively. Only one study demonstrated that no inherited deficiency was found in both BCS patients and healthy subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

Inherited AT, PC, and PS deficiencies are rare in PVST and BCS. These inherited deficiencies increase the risk of PVST.

Thrombotic risk factors in Chinese Budd-Chiari syndrome patients. An observational study with a systematic review of the literature

In Western countries, thrombotic risk factors for Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) are very common, including factor V Leiden mutation, prothrombin G20210A mutation, myeloproliferative neoplasms, paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria, etc. However, the data regarding thrombotic risk factors in Chinese BCS patients are extremely limited. An observational study was conducted to examine this issue. A total of 246 BCS patients who were consecutively admitted to our department between July 1999 and December 2011 were invited to be examined for thrombotic risk factors. Of these, 169 patients were enrolled. Neither factor V Leiden mutation nor prothrombin G20210A mutation was found in any of 136 patients tested. JAK2 V617F mutation was positive in four of 169 patients tested. Neither MPL W515L/K mutation nor JAK2 exon 12 mutation was found in any of 135 patients tested. Overt myeloproliferative neoplasms were diagnosed in five patients (polycythemia vera, n=3; essential thrombocythemia, n=1; idiopathic myelofibrosis, n=1). Two of them had positive JAK2 V617F mutation. Both CD55 and CD59 deficiencies were found in one of 166 patients tested. This patient had a previous history of paroxysmal nocturnal haemo-globinuria before BCS. Anticardiolipin IgG antibodies were positive or weakly positive in six of 166 patients tested. Hyperhomocysteinaemia was found in 64 of 128 patients tested. 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T mutation was found in 96 of 135 patients tested. In conclusion, factor V Leiden mutation, prothrombin G20210A mutation, myeloproliferative neoplasms, and paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria are very rare in Chinese BCS patients, suggesting that the etiological distribution of BCS might be different between Western countries and China.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in combination with or without variceal embolization for the prevention of variceal rebleeding: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is the mainstay treatment option for the complications of portal hypertension. Whether or not variceal embolization should be performed during TIPS procedures remains controversial. A meta-analysis to compare the incidence of shunt dysfunction, variceal rebleeding, encephalopathy, and death between patients treated with TIPS alone and those treated with TIPS combined with variceal embolization was conducted.

METHODS

All relevant studies were searched via PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled. Heterogeneity among studies and publication bias were assessed.

RESULTS

Six articles were included in our study. Type of stents was covered (n = 2), bare (n = 2), mixed (n = 1), and unknown (n = 1). Varices were angiographically embolized by coils in six studies. Additional liquids agents were employed in three studies. Compared with TIPS alone group, TIPS combined with variceal embolization group had a significantly lower incidence of variceal rebleeding (OR 2.02, 95% CI 1.29-3.17, P = 0.002), but a similar incidence of shunt dysfunction (OR 1.26, 95% CI 0.76-2.08, P = 0.38), encephalopathy (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.46-1.43, P = 0.47), and death (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.55-1.47, P = 0.68). Neither any significant heterogeneity nor proof of publication bias among studies was found in all meta-analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjunctive variceal embolization during TIPS procedures might be beneficial in the prevention of variceal rebleeding. However, given the heterogeneity of type of stents, embolic agents, type of varices, and indications of variceal embolization among studies, additional well-designed randomized, controlled trials with larger sample size and use of covered stents should be warranted to confirm these findings.

Prevalence of the JAK2V617F mutation in Chinese patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome and portal vein thrombosis: a prospective study

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Whether routine screening for the JAK2V617F mutation should be performed in Chinese patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) and portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is unclear. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the prevalence of the JAK2V617F mutation in such patients and to explore the risk factors associated with the mutation.

METHODS

All consecutive patients with BCS and PVT diagnosed between September 2009 and May 2011 were prospectively enrolled in the observational study and underwent the JAK2V617F mutation detection.

RESULTS

Prevalence of the JAK2V617F mutation was 4.3% (4/92) in patients with primary BCS, 26.6% (17/64) in non-malignant and non-cirrhotic patients with PVT, and 1.4% (1/71) in cirrhotic patients with PVT. All BCS patients with the JAK2V617F mutation had both platelet count (PLT) of above 100 × 10(9) /L (range, 107-188 × 10(9) /L) and splenomegaly. In non-malignant and non-cirrhotic patients with PVT, higher PLT and older ages were the independent predictors of the JAK2V617F mutation. Further, the difference in PLT between the patients with and without the mutation displayed greater significance in the subgroup of patients with splenomegaly (P < 0.0001), but the statistical significance disappeared in the subgroup of patients with splenectomy (P = 0.1312).

CONCLUSIONS

The low prevalence of the JAK2V617F mutation in patients with BCS suggests that myeloproliferative neoplasm should be an uncommon etiological factor of BCS in China. Routine screening for the JAK2V617F mutation might be recommended in non-malignant and non-cirrhotic patients with PVT, but not in cirrhotic patients with PVT. The coexistence of higher PLT and splenomegaly might be closely associated with the JAK2V617F mutation.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for Budd-Chiari syndrome: techniques, indications and results on 51 Chinese patients from a single centre

BACKGROUND & AIMS

In Western countries, transjugular intrahepatic portosytemic shunt (TIPS) is widely applied for the treatment of Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS). However, the outcome of Chinese BCS patients treated with TIPS is extremely limited. Furthermore, the timing of conversion from percutaneous recanalization to TIPS remains uncertain.

METHODS

All consecutive BCS patients treated with TIPS between December 2004 and June 2012 were included. Patients were classified as the early and converted TIPS groups. Indications, TIPS-related complications, post-TIPS hepatic encephalopathy, shunt dysfunction and death were reported.

RESULTS

Of 51 patients included, 39 underwent percutaneous recanalization for 1024 days (0-4574) before TIPS. Early TIPS group (n = 19) has a shorter history of BCS and a lower proportion of prior percutaneous recanalization than converted TIPS group (n = 32). Main indications were diffuse obstruction of three HVs (n = 12), liver failure (n = 2), liver function deterioration (n = 8), refractory ascites (n = 10) and variceal bleeding (n = 19). Procedure-related intraperitoneal bleeding was reversible in three patients. The cumulative 1-year rate of being free of first episode of post-TIPS hepatic encephalopathy and shunt dysfunction was 78.38 and 61.69% respectively. The cumulative 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates were 83.82, 81.20 and 76.93% respectively. BCS-TIPS score, but not Child-Pugh, MELD, Clichy or Rotterdam score, could predict the survival. Age, total bilirubin and inferior vena cava thrombosis were also significantly associated with overall survival. Survival was similar between early and converted TIPS groups.

CONCLUSIONS

TIPS can achieve an excellent survival in Chinese patients in whom percutaneous recanalization is ineffective or inappropriate. BCS-TIPS score could effectively predict these patients' survival.

Meta-analysis: the significance of screening for JAK2V617F mutation in Budd-Chiari syndrome and portal venous system thrombosis

BACKGROUND

It is important to evaluate whether screening for JAK2V617F mutation should be routinely performed in patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) and portal venous system thrombosis (PVST). However, the prevalence of JAK2V617F mutation in such patients is substantially varied, and its association with development of myeloproliferative disorders (MPD) is deficiently identified.

AIMS

To estimate the prevalence of JAK2V617F mutation and to explore the significance of screening for JAK2V617F mutation in these patients.

METHODS

All observational studies regarding the prevalence of JAK2V617F mutation in patients with BCS and PVST were identified via PubMed and MEDLINE databases. Primary items were the proportions of JAK2V617F mutation and MPD.

RESULTS

Twenty-three studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Regardless of underlying aetiological factors, the pooled prevalence of JAK2V617F mutation was 37% and 24% in patients with BCS and PVST respectively. After pre-existing MPD was excluded, the pooled prevalence was decreased to 26% and 19%. Heterogeneity among studies was significant for the prevalence of JAK2V617F mutation. Compared with healthy subjects and patients with thrombosis in other sites, the prevalence of JAKV617F mutation was significantly higher in patients with BCS and PVST. The prevalence of MPD was significantly higher in patients with JAK2V617F mutation than those without.

CONCLUSIONS

JAK2V617F mutation is frequently found in patients with BCS and PVST, but there is a huge variation of prevalence among the included studies. Additionally, it is more specific to thrombosis in splanchnic areas and strongly associated with the development of MPD in these patients. Further studies are needed to evaluate whether the screening test should be widely performed in Asian countries and cirrhotic patients.

Transient portal vein thrombosis in liver cirrhosis

In real-world clinical practice, the acceptance of anticoagulation therapy in the management of portal vein thrombosis (PVT) in patients with cirrhosis is limited by the fear of an increased bleeding risk. Additionally, accumulating evidence indicates that spontaneous recanalization of PVT may occur in the absence of antithrombotic treatment. Therefore, risk stratification based on outcomes in such patients is crucial for determining a therapeutic strategy. In this paper, we draw attention to the distinct clinical entity, "transient PVT" by introducing two cases with PVT that spontaneously recanalized in the absence of antithrombotic treatment. We reviewed the available data regarding the probability of and predictors for spontaneous recanalization of PVT. Available data suggest singling out transient thrombosis in the natural history of PVT in patients with cirrhosis because of its prognostic and management implications.

Management of hepatocellular carcinoma: an overview of major findings from meta-analyses

This paper aims to systematically review the major findings from meta-analyses comparing different treatment options for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A total of 153 relevant papers were searched via the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library databases. They were classified according to the mainstay treatment modalities (i.e., liver transplantation, surgical resection, radiofrequency ablation, transarterial embolization or chemoembolization, sorafenib, and others). The primary outcome data, such as overall survival, diseases-free survival or recurrence-free survival, progression-free survival, and safety, were summarized. The recommendations and uncertainties regarding the treatment of HCC were also proposed.

Hepatic resection alone versus in combination with pre- and post-operative transarterial chemoembolization for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with hepatic resection may be improved by the adjunctive use of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). This study aimed to systematically compare the outcomes between hepatic resection with and without TACE groups.

METHODS

All relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs were searched by the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were two major outcomes. Meta-analyses were performed according to the timing of TACE (pre- or post-operative TACE). Subgroup analyses were also performed. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs) were calculated.

RESULTS

Overall, 55 papers were included (14 RCTs and 41 non-RCTs). Overall meta-analyses demonstrated that OS and DFS were statistically similar between hepatic resection with and without pre-operative TACE groups (HR = 1.01, 95%CI = 0.87-1.19, P = 0.87; HR = 0.91, 95%CI = 0.82-1.01, P = 0.07). Subgroup analyses of RCTs or non-RCTs showed that OS and DFS remained statistically similar between hepatic resection with and without pre-operative TACE groups. Subgroup analysis of incomplete or no tumor necrosis showed that OS was worse in hepatic resection with pre-operative TACE group than in hepatic resection without pre-operative TACE group. By contrast, subgroup analysis of complete tumor necrosis showed that DFS was better in hepatic resection with pre-operative TACE group than in hepatic resection without pre-operative TACE group.Overall meta-analyses demonstrated that OS and DFS were better in hepatic resection with post-operative TACE group than in hepatic resection without post-operative TACE group (HR = 0.85, 95%CI = 0.72-1.00, P = 0.06; HR = 0.83, 95%CI = 0.73-0.94, P = 0.004). Subgroup analyses of RCTs, vascular invasion, or large HCC showed that OS and DFS remained better in hepatic resection with post-operative TACE group than in hepatic resection without post-operative TACE group. By contrast, subgroup analyses of non-RCTs, no vascular invasion, or small HCC showed that OS and DFS were statistically similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Post-operative TACE, rather than pre-operative TACE, may be considered as an adjunctive treatment option for HCC treated with hepatic resection.

Hepatic resection versus transarterial chemoembolization for the initial treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

According to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system, hepatic resection and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) should be recommended in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) within and beyond the BCLC stage A, respectively. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the overall survival between HCC patients undergoing hepatic resection and TACE.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library databases were searched. All relevant studies were considered, if they reported the survival data in HCC patients undergoing hepatic resection and TACE. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for the comparison of cumulative overall survival. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95%CIs were calculated for the comparison of 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates. Subgroup analyses were performed according to the BCLC stages and portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT). Sensitivity analyses were performed in moderate- and high-quality studies and in studies published after 2005.

RESULTS

Fifty of 2029 retrieved papers were included. One, 15, and 34 studies were of high-, moderate-, and low-quality, respectively. The overall meta-analysis demonstrated a statistically significantly higher overall survival in hepatic resection group than in TACE group (HR=0.60, 95%CI=0.55-0.66). Additionally, 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were statistically significantly higher in hepatic resection group than in TACE group (OR=1.82, 95%CI=1.56-2.14; OR=3.09, 95%CI=2.60-3.67; OR=3.48, 95%CI=2.83-4.27). The subgroup meta-analyses confirmed the statistical significance in HCC within the BCLC stage A (HR=0.72, 95%CI=0.64-0.80), in HCC beyond the BCLC stage A (HR=0.60, 95%CI=0.51-0.69), in HCC within the BCLC stage B alone (HR=0.48, 95%CI=0.25-0.90), and in HCC with PVTT (HR=0.78, 95%CI=0.68-0.91). The statistical significance was also confirmed by sensitivity analyses in moderate- and high-quality studies (HR=0.62, 95%CI=0.53-0.71) and in studies published after 2005 (HR=0.59, 95%CI=0.53-0.66).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on a systematic review and meta-analysis, hepatic resection may be considered in HCC beyond the BCLC stage A. However, given the limitations of study quality, more well-designed randomized controlled trials should be warranted to confirm these findings.

MET inhibitors for treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A review

The current standard treatment option for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is sorafenib, but its clinical benefit is modest. In spite of many attempts, few drugs can provide any significant improvement of survival as the first- or second-line therapy of choice in phase III randomized controlled trials. Recently, the subgroup analysis of a phase II randomized controlled trial has shown that tivantinib, a selective MET inhibitor, can significantly improve the overall survival in patients with MET-positive advanced HCC after the failure or intolerance of a prior systemic therapy. These findings enlighten the role of MET inhibitors in the treatment of advanced HCC. In this paper, we review all ongoing and completed clinical trials regarding this topic. As for the first-line therapy of advanced HCC, INC280 and foretinib are being evaluated in 2 phase II single-arm trials; and MSC2156119J and golvatinib plus sorafenib are being compared with sorafenib alone in 2 phase II randomized controlled trials. As for the second-line therapy of advanced HCC, tivantinib and cabozantinib are being compared with placebo in 2 phase III randomized controlled trials.

Radiofrequency ablation versus hepatic resection for small hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND AND GOALS

Whether radiofrequency ablation or hepatic resection is superior for improving the survival in patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains controversial. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was performed to examine this issue.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were used to identify all randomized controlled trials comparing the survival between small HCC patients receiving radiofrequency ablation and hepatic resection. The hazard ratio (HR) was pooled to compare the overall survival and recurrence-free survival rates. The odds ratio was pooled to compare the incidence of treatment-related complications. The mean difference was pooled to compare the hospitalization duration. Heterogeneity among studies was assessed.

RESULTS

Three randomized controlled trials were included in this meta-analysis. All patients met the Milan criteria. Hepatic resection was superior to radiofrequency ablation for the improvement of overall survival [HR=1.41; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.06-1.89; P=0.02] and recurrence-free survival (HR=1.41; 95% CI, 1.14-1.74; P=0.001). Heterogeneity among studies was not significant (overall survival: P=0.14; recurrence-free survival: P=0.28). Patients treated with hepatic resection had a significantly higher incidence of treatment-related complications (odds ratio=0.12; 95% CI, 0.03-0.47; P=0.002) and a significantly longer hospitalization duration (mean difference: -8.77; 95% CI, -10.36 to -7.18; P<0.00001) than those treated with radiofrequency ablation. Heterogeneity among studies was significant (treatment-related complications: P=0.006; hospitalization duration: P=0.003). No hospital death occurred in the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence from the meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials suggested that hepatic resection might improve the overall survival and recurrence-free survival in small HCC patients, whereas increase the complications and hospitalization duration. However, this conclusion should be explained with caution, due to the absence of further subgroup analysis with respect to the outcome in patients with different tumor size (<3 and 3 to 5 cm).

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for portal vein thrombosis with variceal bleeding in liver cirrhosis: outcomes and predictors in a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The role of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) for the secondary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding in cirrhotic patients with portal vein thrombosis (PVT) remains obscure. This prospective cohort study aimed to assess the risk factors associated with TIPS technical success, outcome and prognosis in cirrhotic patients with PVT and a history of variceal bleeding.

METHODS

Between May 2009 and April 2011, 51 cirrhotic patients with PVT who attempted TIPS procedures for the prevention of variceal rebleeding were enrolled.

RESULTS

TIPS success rate was 84% (43/51). An increased degree of thrombosis within the portal trunk and portal vein branches was inversely associated with TIPS success. Median follow-up time was 40.07 months (range: 0.02-56.87). The cumulative risk of rebleeding was significantly different between TIPS success and failure group (P = 0.002). The univariate analysis also demonstrated that TIPS failure was the only significant predictor associated with rebleeding (hazard ratio [HR] = 4.174, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.558-11.186). In TIPS success group, the cumulative rates free of shunt dysfunction at the 6th and 12th month were 79% and 76% respectively. Absence of total superior mesenteric vein (SMV) thrombosis was the only independent predictor (HR = 0.189, 95% CI: 0.047-0.755). In TIPS success group, the 1- and 3-year cumulative survival rates were 77% and 62% respectively. Albumin level was the only independent predictor (HR = 0.877, 95% CI: 0.779-0.986).

CONCLUSION

Successful TIPS insertions could effectively prevent from rebleeding in cirrhotic patients with PVT and variceal bleeding. Degree of PVT and SMV thrombosis was associated with TIPS failure and shunt dysfunction respectively.

Association between portal vein thrombosis and survival of liver transplant recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) increases the technical complexity of liver transplantation (LT). This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to analyze the association of pre-LT PVT with the overall survival after LT.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library databases were used to search for papers related to the association between pre-LT PVT and survival of LT recipients. The differences in the survival rates between the LT recipients with and without pre-LT PVT were expressed as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Twenty-seven papers were included. Overall meta-analysis showed that the total LT recipients with pre-LT PVT had a significantly lower 1-year survival rate than those without pre-LT PVT (OR=0.733, 95%CI=0.621-0.865; P=0.0002). But no statistically significant difference was observed in the in-hospital (OR=0.713, 95%CI=0.343-1.482; P=0.365), 1-month (OR=0.679, 95%CI=0.345-1.333; P=0.261), or 5-year survival rate (OR=0.788, 95%CI=0.587-1.058; P=0.113). Additionally, the 1-year survival rate was significantly lower in the LT recipients with complete PVT than in those without PVT (OR=0.503, 95%CI=0.295-0.858; P=0.012). However, no statistically significant difference in the 1-year survival rate between them was observed in the meta-analysis of high-quality studies (OR=0.899, 95%CI=0.657-1.230; P=0.505) or that of studies in which LT was performed after 2000 (OR=0.783, 95%CI=0.566-1.083; P=0.140).

CONCLUSION

Pre-LT PVT, especially complete PVT, decreased the 1-year survival rate after LT. However, the detrimental effect of pre-LT PVT on the survival of LT recipients became inconclusive in high-quality studies. Additionally, further well-designed cohort studies should validate the association in patients undergoing LT during the latter years.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in the treatment of portal vein thrombosis: a critical review of literature

Reports of successful transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) surgery in patients with portal vein thrombosis (PVT) are considered anecdotal owing to the technical difficulty of the procedure and potential procedure-related complications. A literature review was undertaken to determine the feasibility and safety of TIPS in the treatment of PVT. All studies in which TIPS was attempted in patients with PVT were identified by searching through the PUBMED and MEDLINE databases. A total of 424 PVT patients undergoing TIPS were reported in 54 articles. The success rate of TIPS insertion was 67-100% in 19 case series. Further, 85 patients with portal cavernoma underwent successful TIPS insertions. Three therapeutic strategies of TIPS placement were used: (1) TIPS placement followed by portal vein recanalization via the shunt, (2) portal vein recanalization via percutaneous approaches followed by TIPS placement, and (3) TIPS insertion between a hepatic vein and a large collateral vessel without portal vein recanalization. Four approaches were used to access the portal vein: transjugular, transhepatic, transsplenic, and transmesenteric. Intra-abdominal hemorrhage secondary to hepatic capsule perforation was lethal in only three patients. No episode of pulmonary embolism was reported. Other procedure-related complications were reversible. The overall incidence of shunt dysfunction and hepatic encephalopathy was 8-33% and 0-50%, respectively. In conclusion, the reviewed studies uniformly support the feasibility and safety of TIPS for PVT even in the presence of portal cavernoma. Further, several major issues that remain unresolved are discussed.

Effect of antithrombin, protein C and protein S on portal vein thrombosis in liver cirrhosis: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The effects of antithrombin (AT), protein C (PC) and protein S (PS) on the pathogenesis of portal vein thrombosis (PVT) in liver cirrhosis remain controversial in different studies. In this study, a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine this issue were performed.

METHODS

PubMed database was employed to identify all studies in which AT, PC and PS concentrations were measured in both cirrhotic patients with and without PVT. A standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated to evaluate the effect of AT, PC and PS on PVT. Data were pooled using both fixed-effect and random-effect models. Only the pooled data using random-effect model were considered appropriate, when significant heterogeneity was observed.

RESULTS

Nine studies involving 160 cirrhotic patients with PVT and 428 cirrhotic patients without PVT were eligible. AT and PC concentrations were similar between PVT and non-PVT groups (AT: SMD = -0.21, 95% CI = -0.56 to 0.14, P = 0.24; PC: SMD = -0.23, 95% CI = -0.55 to 0.09, P = 0.16). But PS concentration was significantly lower in the PVT group than in the non-PVT group (SMD = -0.29, 95% CI = -0.49 to -0.08, P = 0.006). Subgroup analyses were further conducted in 4 studies in which baseline liver function was similar between cirrhotic patients with and without PVT, showing similar AT, PC and PS concentrations between the 2 groups (AT: SMD = -0.10, 95% CI = -0.36 to 0.16, P = 0.57; PC: SMD = -0.18, 95% CI = -0.62 to 0.25, P = 0.41; PS: SMD = -0.10, 95% CI = -0.59 to 0.39, P = 0.69).

CONCLUSIONS

AT, PC and PS concentrations might not be associated with the pathogenesis of PVT in liver cirrhosis, especially when the impact of liver function was excluded.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in the treatment of Budd-Chiari syndrome: a critical review of literatures

An increasing number of patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) have undergone transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). However, the critical role of TIPS in the treatment of BCS has not been systematically reviewed. The authors identified all relevant literatures via the PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane library databases. Overall, 160 papers from 29 countries reported the application of TIPS for BCS. The number of publications was increased over time, but the level of evidence in this field was low. Common indications for TIPS in BCS patients included refractory ascites, recurrent variceal bleeding, diffuse hepatic vein thrombosis and progressive liver failure. Successful TIPS insertion could improve the hemodynamic and clinical parameters. TIPS procedure-related complications were not infrequent (range: 0-56%), but procedure-related death was rare. Shunt dysfunction rate appeared to be higher (range: 18-100%). Compared with bare stents, covered stents could significantly decrease the rate of shunt dysfunction. Hepatic encephalopathy rate after TIPS was relatively low (range: 0-25%). Short- and long-term prognosis of BCS-TIPS patients was excellent with 1-year cumulative survival rate of 80-100% and 5-year cumulative survival rate of 74-78%. In conclusions, existing literatures supported the feasibility, safety and efficacy of TIPS in the treatment of BCS. Prospective cohort studies or randomized controlled trials were difficult due to the rarity of BCS, but might be very necessary to precisely identify the timing of transition from medical therapy and/or percutaneous recanalization to TIPS insertion and the real candidates in whom early TIPS should be promptly employed with no need of any prior therapy.

Nonselective beta-blockers in cirrhotic patients with no or small varices: A meta-analysis

AIM

To explore effects of nonselective beta-blockers (NSBBs) in cirrhotic patients with no or small varices.

METHODS

The PubMed, EMBASE, Science Direct, and Cochrane library databases were searched for relevant papers. A meta-analysis was performed using ORs with 95%CI as the effect sizes. Subgroup analysis was conducted according to the studies including patients without varices and those with small varices.

RESULTS

Overall, 784 papers were initially retrieved from the database searches, of which six randomized controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis. The incidences of large varices development (OR = 1.05, 95%CI: 0.25-4.36; P = 0.95), first upper gastrointestinal bleeding (OR = 0.59, 95%CI: 0.24-1.47; P = 0.26), and death (OR = 0.70, 95%CI: 0.45-1.10; P = 0.12) were similar between NSBB and placebo groups. However, the incidence of adverse events was significantly higher in the NSBB group compared with the placebo group (OR = 3.47, 95%CI: 1.45-8.33; P = 0.005). The results of subgroup analyses were similar to those of overall analyses.

CONCLUSION

The results of this meta-analysis indicate that NSBBs should not be recommended for cirrhotic patients with no or small varices.

Association between portal vein thrombosis and risk of bleeding in liver cirrhosis: A systematic review of the literature

AIMS

A systematic review of the literature was conducted to explore the association of portal vein thrombosis (PVT) with the risk of bleeding in liver cirrhosis.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library databases were searched for all relevant papers, which compared the prevalence of bleeding at baseline and/or incidence of bleeding during follow-up between cirrhotic patients with and without PVT.

RESULTS

Eighteen papers were eligible for this systematic review. The heterogeneity among studies was marked with regards to the treatment modalities, sources of bleeding, lengths of follow-up, and ways of data expression. But most of their findings were homozygous and suggested that the cirrhotic patients with PVT were more likely to have previous histories of bleeding at their admission and to develop de novo bleeding and/or rebleeding during the short- and long-term follow-up. The association of PVT with the risk of bleeding might be weakened in the multivariate analyses. Additionally, as for the cirrhotic patients with gastric variceal bleeding treated with medical/endoscopic therapy, the association of PVT with the risk of rebleeding remained controversial in 2 studies; as for the cirrhotic patients undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts for the management of variceal bleeding, a pre-existing PVT was not associated with the risk of rebleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on a systematic review of the literature, there was a positive association between the presence of PVT and risk of bleeding in liver cirrhosis in most of clinical conditions. However, whether PVT aggravated the development of bleeding during follow-up needed to be further explored.