Molecular Biology of Bladder Cancer: Potential Implications for Therapy

Recently completed studies provided high-resolution descriptions of the molecular biological characteristics of urothelial bladder cancers. Whole transcriptome messenger RNA expression profiling revealed that they can be grouped into basal and luminal molecular subtypes resembling the ones described in breast cancers. Retrospective DNA sequencing efforts revealed roles for disruption of DNA damage response pathways in response to conventional chemotherapy and immune checkpoint blockade, and completed and ongoing studies indicate that the molecular biological properties of infiltrating host cells dictate also influence therapeutic outcomes. This article reviews these findings and identify gaps in knowledge that represent opportunities for future research.

Current Perioperative Therapy for Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer

Radical cystectomy is curative in only approximately 50% of patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Although perioperative radiotherapy has been tested with the intent of improving locoregional disease control, there currently is no role for this modality in routine care. Perioperative systemic therapy is used with the intent of reducing the risk of systemic recurrence. Robust trial evidence supports the use of neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy, with adjuvant chemotherapy offered as an alternative if neoadjuvant therapy is not administered. Perioperative immunotherapy represents the next frontier in perioperative therapy. Further biomarker development is required to guide treatment in individual patients.

The "Great Debate" at Melanoma Bridge 2020: December, 5th, 2020

The Great Debate session at the 2020 Melanoma Bridge virtual congress (December 3rd-5th, Italy) featured counterpoint views from experts on five specific controversial issues in melanoma. The debates considered whether or not innate immunity is important in the response to cancer and immunotherapy, how useful are the revised American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) classification for the staging of patients, the use of sentinel node biopsy for staging patients, the use of triplet combination of targeted therapy plus immunotherapy versus combined immunotherapy, and the respective benefits of neoadjuvant versus adjuvant therapy. As is usual with Bridge congresses, the debates were assigned by meeting Chairs and positions taken by experts during the debates may not have necessarily reflected their own personal opinion.

Impact of pathological tumor response after CROSS neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery on long-term outcome of esophageal cancer: a population-based study

BACKGROUND

With increasing interest in organ-preserving strategies for potentially curable esophageal cancer, real-world data is needed to understand the impact of pathological tumor response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) on patient outcome. The objective of this study is to assess the association between pathological tumor response following CROSS neoadjuvant CRT and long-term overall survival (OS) in a nationwide cohort.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All patients diagnosed in the Netherlands with potentially curable esophageal cancer between 2009 and 2017, and treated with neoadjuvant CRT followed by esophagectomy were included. Through record linkage with the nationwide Dutch Pathology Registry (PALGA), pathological data were obtained. The primary outcome was pathological tumor response based on ypTNM, classified into pathological complete response (ypT0N0) and incomplete responders (ypT0N+, ypT+N0, and ypT+N+). Multivariable logistic and Cox regression models were used to identify predictors of pathological complete response (pCR) and survival.

RESULTS

A total of 4946 patients were included. Overall, 24% achieved pCR, with 19% in adenocarcinoma and 42% in squamous cell carcinoma. Patients with pCR had a better estimated 5-year OS compared to incomplete responders (62% vs. 38%, p< .001). Of the patients with incomplete response, ypT+N+ patients (32% of total population) had the lowest estimated 5-year OS rate, followed by ypT0N+ and ypT+ N0 (22%, 47%, and 49%, respectively, p< .001). Adenocarcinoma, well to moderate differentiation, cT3-4, cN+, signet ring cell differentiation and lymph node yield (≥15) were associated with lower likelihood of pCR.

CONCLUSION

In this population-based study, pathological tumor response based on the ypTNM-stage was associated with different prognostic subgroups. A quarter of patients achieved ypT0N0 with favorable long-term survival, while one-third had an ypT+N+ response with very poor survival. The association between pathological tumor response and long-term survival could help in more accurate assessments of individual prognosis and treatment decisions.

Management of Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck

Basal cell carcinoma is the most common human malignancy, with an incidence exceeding all other cancers combined. Advanced basal cell cancer requires a multidisciplinary approach to management. The mainstay of treatment remains surgical excision with appropriate reconstruction. Some advanced tumors may require radical resections; however, extensive, high-risk surgery may be justified by the indolent biology of the disease and the likelihood of cure. Other options, such as radiation or systemic targeted therapy, may be considered in selected patients who either refuse or are not candidates for surgery. The focus of this article is primarily on management of these high-risk cases.

Creative and Innovative Methods and Techniques for the Challenges in the Management of Adult Craniopharyngioma

Craniopharyngioma remains a major challenge in daily clinical practice. The pathobiology of the tumor is still elusive, and there are no consensus or treatment guidelines on the optimal management strategy for this relatively rare tumor. However, recent technical and scientific advances, including genomic and radiomic profiling, innovation in surgical approaches, more precise radiotherapy protocols, targeted therapy, and restoration of lost functions all have the potential to significantly improve the outcome of patients with craniopharyngioma in the near future. Although many of these innovative tools in the new armamentarium of the clinician are still in their infancy, they could reduce craniopharyngioma-related morbidity and mortality and improve the patients' quality of life. In this article, we discuss these creative and innovative approaches that may offer solutions to the obstacles faced in treating craniopharyngioma and future possibilities in improving the care of these patients.

Nascent Prostate Cancer Heterogeneity Drives Evolution and Resistance to Intense Hormonal Therapy

BACKGROUND

Patients diagnosed with high risk localized prostate cancer have variable outcomes following surgery. Trials of intense neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (NADT) have shown lower rates of recurrence among patients with minimal residual disease after treatment. The molecular features that distinguish exceptional responders from poor responders are not known.

OBJECTIVE

To identify genomic and histologic features associated with treatment resistance at baseline.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Targeted biopsies were obtained from 37 men with intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer before receiving 6 mo of ADT plus enzalutamide. Biopsy tissues were used for whole-exome sequencing and immunohistochemistry (IHC).

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

We assessed the relationship of molecular features with final pathologic response using a cutpoint of 0.05 cm³ for residual cancer burden to compare exceptional responders to incomplete and nonresponders. We assessed intratumoral heterogeneity at the tissue and genomic level, and compared the volume of residual disease to the Shannon diversity index for each tumor. We generated multivariate models of resistance based on three molecular features and one histologic feature, with and without multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging estimates of baseline tumor volume.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Loss of chromosome 10q (containing PTEN) and alterations to TP53 were predictive of poor response, as were the expression of nuclear ERG on IHC and the presence of intraductal carcinoma of the prostate. Patients with incompletely and nonresponding tumors harbored greater tumor diversity as estimated via phylogenetic tree reconstruction from DNA sequencing and analysis of IHC staining. Our four-factor binary model (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] 0.89) to predict poor response correlated with greater diversity in our cohort and a validation cohort of 57 Gleason score 8-10 prostate cancers from The Cancer Genome Atlas. When baseline tumor volume was added to the model, it distinguished poor response to NADT with an AUC of 0.98. Prospective use of this model requires further retrospective validation with biopsies from additional trials.

CONCLUSIONS

A subset of prostate cancers exhibit greater histologic and genomic diversity at the time of diagnosis, and these localized tumors have greater fitness to resist therapy.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Some prostate cancer tumors do not respond well to a hormonal treatment called androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). We used tumor volume and four other parameters to develop a model to identify tumors that will not respond well to ADT. Treatments other than ADT should be considered for these patients.

Total neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX versus neoadjuvant gemcitabine-based chemoradiotherapy and adjuvant gemcitabine for resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (PREOPANC-2 trial): study protocol for a nationwide multicenter randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant therapy has several potential advantages over upfront surgery in patients with localized pancreatic cancer; more patients receive systemic treatment, fewer patients undergo futile surgery, and R0 resection rates are higher, thereby possibly improving overall survival (OS). Two recent randomized trials have suggested benefit of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy over upfront surgery, both including single-agent chemotherapy regimens. Potentially, the multi-agent FOLFIRINOX regimen (5-fluorouracil with leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin) may further improve outcomes in the neoadjuvant setting for localized pancreatic cancer, but randomized studies are needed. The PREOPANC-2 trial investigates whether neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX improves OS compared with neoadjuvant gemcitabine-based chemoradiotherapy and adjuvant gemcitabine in resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer patients.

METHODS

This nationwide multicenter phase III randomized controlled trial includes patients with pathologically confirmed resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer with a WHO performance score of 0 or 1. Resectable pancreatic cancer is defined as no arterial and ≤ 90 degrees venous involvement; borderline resectable pancreatic cancer is defined as ≤90 degrees arterial and ≤ 270 degrees venous involvement without occlusion. Patients receive 8 cycles of neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy followed by surgery without adjuvant treatment (arm A), or 3 cycles of neoadjuvant gemcitabine with hypofractionated radiotherapy (36 Gy in 15 fractions) during the second cycle, followed by surgery and 4 cycles of adjuvant gemcitabine (arm B). The primary endpoint is OS by intention-to-treat. Secondary endpoints include progression-free survival, quality of life, resection rate, and R0 resection rate. To detect a hazard ratio of 0.70 with 80% power, 252 events are needed. The number of events is expected to be reached after inclusion of 368 eligible patients assuming an accrual period of 3 years and 1.5 years follow-up.

DISCUSSION

The PREOPANC-2 trial directly compares two neoadjuvant regimens for patients with resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Our study will provide evidence on the neoadjuvant treatment of choice for patients with resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Primary registry and trial identifying number: EudraCT: 2017-002036-17 . Date of registration: March 6, 2018. Secondary identifying numbers: The Netherlands National Trial Register - NL7094 , NL61961.078.17, MEC-2018-004.

Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

There is uncertainty regarding the role of adding immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).

METHODS

We identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing ICIs combined with NACT to NACT in early-stage TNBC. Efficacy outcomes included pathological complete response (pCR) and event-free survival (EFS). Toxicity data included any grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, AEs leading to death, common and meaningful AEs associated with chemotherapy and immune-related AEs. Odds ratio (ORs), hazard ratios (HR) and their respective 95% confidence intervals (CI) for efficacy and toxicity were extracted and pooled in a meta-analysis. Differences in the odds for pCR between programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) status and between PD-L1 and PD-1 inhibitors were also assessed.

RESULTS

Five RCTs comprising 2,075 patients were analyzed. Compared to NACT alone, combination of ICIs and NACT significantly improved pCR (OR 1.75, 95% CI 1.25-2.47, p = 0.001) and EFS (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.48-0.91, p = 0.01). Magnitude of effect on pCR was similar between PD-L1-positive and PD-L1-negative tumors (p for the subgroup difference = 0.80) and between PD-L1 and PD-1 inhibitors (p = 0.27). The combination treatment resulted in higher odds of any grade 3/4 AEs (OR 1.31, p = 0.02) and serious AEs (OR 1.84, p = 0.006), with no statistically significant difference in AEs leading to death (OR 1.67, p = 0.51). Higher magnitude of toxicity was observed for immune-related AEs.

CONCLUSION

Combination of ICIs and NACT were associated with improved outcome in early-stage TNBC while increasing toxicity significantly. Longer follow-up is desired to better understand the risk and benefit ratio of this combination.

Perioperative chemotherapy and regional hyperthermia for high-risk adult-type soft tissue sarcomas

A group of patients with adult-type soft tissue sarcoma is at high risk of local recurrence and distant metastases. Age, tumour site, histological subtype, tumour size and grade have been identified as the most important independent adverse prognostic factors. Macroscopically complete tumour resection is considered as the mainstay of treatment with the addition of preoperative or postoperative radiotherapy for extremity or trunk localisation. Retroperitoneal localisation requires compartmental resection and is associated with a worse prognosis. Here, radiotherapy is of no proven value. Perioperative chemotherapy is considered to treat micrometastatic disease not detectable at the time of diagnosis. The neoadjuvant application gives the risk of distant metastasis the greatest importance as therapy is carried out at the earliest possible time, whereas adjuvant chemotherapy is delayed by surgery and the necessary wound healing. With reported response rates up to 30%, both the operability may be improved and the risk of intraoperative tumour cell dissemination may be reduced, resulting also in reduced local relapse rates. However, the potential risk of early tumour progression may counteract this benefit. Optimised strategies with multimodality approaches including chemotherapy, regional hyperthermia (RHT) and immunotherapeutic agents have been shown to improve survival in high-risk patients. Here, we focus on the data from available randomised studies investigating the use of perioperative chemotherapy in patients with high-risk adult-type soft tissue sarcoma, including the use of RHT for local enhancement of chemotherapy effect and immune induction.

Phase II Trial of Neoadjuvant Carboplatin and Nab-Paclitaxel in Patients with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

In this phase II clinical trial, we evaluated the efficacy of the nonanthracycline combination of carboplatin and nab-paclitaxel in early stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with newly diagnosed stage II-III TNBC (n = 69) were treated with neoadjuvant carboplatin (area under the curve 6) every 28 days for four cycles plus nab-paclitaxel (100 mg/m2 ) weekly for 16 weeks. Pathological complete response (pCR) and residual cancer burden (RCB) were analyzed with germline mutation status, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), TNBC molecular subtype, and GeparSixto immune signature (GSIS).

RESULTS

Sixty-seven patients were evaluable for safety and response. Fifty-three (79%) patients experienced grade 3/4 adverse events, including grade 3 anemia (43%), neutropenia (39%), leukopenia (15%), thrombocytopenia (12%), fatigue (7%), peripheral neuropathy (7%), neutropenia (16%), and leukopenia (1%). Twenty-four patients (35%) had at least one dose delay, and 50 patients (72%) required dose reduction. Sixty-three (94%) patients completed scheduled treatment. The responses were as follows: 32 of 67 patients (48%) had pCR (RCB 0), 10 of 67 (15%) had RCB I, 19 of 67 (28%) had RCB II, 5 of 67 (7%) had RCB III, and 1 of 67 (2%) progressed and had no surgery. Univariate analysis showed that immune-hot GSIS and DNA repair defect (DRD) were associated with higher pCR with odds ratios of 4.62 (p = .005) and 4.76 (p = .03), respectively, and with RCB 0/I versus RCB II/III with odds ratio 4.80 (p = .01). Immune-hot GSIS was highly correlated with DRD status (p = .03), TIL level (p < .001), and TNBC molecular subtype (p < .001). After adjusting for age, race, stage, and grade, GSIS remained associated with higher pCR and RCB class 0/I versus II/III with odds ratios 7.19 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.01-25.68; p = .002) and 8.95 (95% CI, 2.09-38.23; p = .003), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The combination of carboplatin and nab-paclitaxel for early stage high-risk TNBC showed manageable toxicity and encouraging antitumor activity. Immune-hot GSIS is associated with higher pCR rate and RCB class 0/1. This study provides an additional rationale for using nonanthracycline platinum-based therapy for future neoadjuvant trials in early stage TNBCs. Clinical trial identification number: NCT01525966 IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Platinum is an important neoadjuvant chemotherapy agent for treatment of early stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). In this study, carboplatin and nab-paclitaxel were well tolerated and highly effective in TNBC, resulting in pathological complete response of 48%. In univariate and multivariate analyses adjusting for age, race, tumor stage and grade, "immune-hot" GeparSixto immune signature (GSIS) and DNA repair defect (DRD) were associated with higher pathological complete response (pCR) and residual cancer burden class 0/1. The association of immune-hot GSIS with higher pCR holds promise for de-escalating neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with early stage TNBC. Although GSIS is not routinely used in clinic, further development of this immune signature into a clinically applicable assay is indicated.

Radiotherapy for Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreas Cancer: When and Why?

The role of (chemo) radiation in the perioperative management of patients with resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is controversial. Herein, we review and interpret existing data relating to the ability of (chemo) radiation to "downstage" pancreatic tumors, delay recurrence, and prolong patients' survival. In sum, the evidence suggests that while neoadjuvant (chemo) radiation may impact pathologic metrics favorably, it rarely converts anatomically unresectable tumors to resectable ones. And while data do support the ability of (chemo)radiation to delay cancer progression, its ability to prolong longevity has not been confirmed. It is possible that (chemo)radiation is effective in prolonging the survival of select patients, but to date, this cohort remains undefined due to heterogeneity in both the populations studied and the regimens used to treat them. Based on our interpretation of existing data, we currently administer neoadjuvant and adjuvant (chemo)radiation selectively to patients with localized pancreatic cancer who we consider at highest risk for local progression. We may also use it as an alternative to pancreatectomy in patients who are poor candidates for surgery. Ultimately, the role of (chemo)radiation in these settings is evolving. Better studies of patients most likely to benefit from its local effects are necessary to clearly define its place within the perioperative treatment algorithms used for patients with localized pancreatic cancer.

Impact of sequence order of anthracyclines and taxanes in neoadjuvant chemotherapy on pathologic complete response rate in HER2-negative breast cancer patients

PURPOSE

Data exploring optimal sequencing of anthracyclines and taxanes as neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for breast cancer are limited and inconsistent. The objective of this study was to assess the real-world impact of sequence order on pathologic complete response (pCR) and clinical outcomes from NACT.

METHODS

Patients with HER2-negative breast cancer treated with NACT from May 2012 to April 2020 were identified from a prospectively collected institutional database. The primary endpoint was to compare rates of pCR (ypT0/isN0) between patients who received anthracyclines followed by taxanes (AC-T) to those who received taxanes followed by anthracyclines (T-AC). Additional endpoints of interest included clinical complete response, downstaging, Neo-Bioscore, conversion to breast-conserving surgery eligibility, relapse-free survival, and overall survival between groups.

RESULTS

Of the 283 patients who met eligibility criteria, 187 (66%) received AC-T and 96 (34%) received T-AC. Sequence order did not influence the primary endpoint of pCR rate (19% for AC-T vs. 21% for T-AC, p = 0.752). There were also no significant differences in secondary NACT efficacy outcomes between groups. In the overall cohort, pCR rate was higher in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) (32% vs. 13% in hormone-positive cancer, p < 0.001) and grade 3 tumors (31% vs. 12% for grade 1-2 tumors, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this real-world analysis of HER2-negative breast cancer patients, there was no differential impact on pCR rate or clinical outcomes from NACT with sequence order of anthracyclines and taxanes. This supports the current variation in prescribing practice.

Long-term outcome of (neo)adjuvant zoledronic acid therapy in locally advanced breast cancer

PURPOSE

The role of zoledronic acid (ZOL), a bone-targeted bisphosphonate, in the treatment of patients with breast cancer remains an active area of study. Here, we report the long-term outcomes of a randomized placebo-controlled phase II clinical trial in which ZOL treatment was added to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in women with locally advanced breast cancer.

METHODS

120 women with clinical stage II-III (≥ T2 and/or ≥ N1) newly diagnosed breast cancer were randomized to receive either 4 mg intravenous ZOL every 3 weeks for 1 year (17 total doses) beginning with the first dose of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, or chemotherapy alone. Clinical endpoints included time to recurrence (TTR), time to bone recurrence (TTBR), time to non-bone recurrence (TTNBR), breast cancer survival (BCS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

With a median follow-up interval of 14.4 years, there were no significant differences in any of the clinical endpoints studied between the control and ZOL groups in the overall study population. However, ER+/HER2- patients younger than age 45 who were treated with ZOL had significantly worse TTR and TTNBR with a trend towards worse TTBR, BCS and OS (TTR: P = 0.024, HR 6.05 [1.26-29.1]; TTNBR: P = 0.026, HR 6.94 [1.26-38.1]; TTBR: P = 0.054, HR 6.01 [0.97-37.1]; BCS: P = 0.138, HR 4.43 [0.62-31.7]; OS: P = 0.138, HR 4.43 [0.62-31.7]). These differences were not seen in older ER+/HER2- patients or triple-negative patients of any age.

CONCLUSION

Addition of ZOL to neoadjuvant therapy did not significantly affect clinical outcomes in the overall study population but was associated with increased extra-skeletal recurrence and a trend towards worse survival in ER+/HER2- patients younger than age 45. These findings suggest caution when using zoledronic acid in young, premenopausal women with locally advanced breast cancer and warrant further investigation. Clinical Trial Registration Number NCT00242203, Date of Registration: 10/17/2005.

Assessing the Effect of Radiotherapy in Addition to Surgery in Colon Adenocarcinomas: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Contemporary Evidence

PURPOSE

This study aims to review the contemporary evidence investigating radiotherapy (RT) in addition to surgery for colon adenocarcinomas.

METHODS

We searched the following databases: PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus, ASCOpubs, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. Studies (since January 2005) comparing outcomes of high-risk colon adenocarcinomas who underwent RT in addition to surgery versus no RT were eligible. Pooling of outcomes from published results or from analysis of survival curves was done. Subgroup analysis was conducted to determine if the efficacy of RT varies with RT timing.

RESULTS

Eight studies were included (five retrospective cohorts, three population-based studies). Pooled analysis from retrospective cohorts showed a reduction in 5-year LR (OR 0.41; 95% CI 0.21-0.79; p = 0.007) in the RT group. A benefit in 3-year (OR 1.81; 95% CI 1.15-2.87; p = 0.01) and 5-year (OR 2.10; 95% CI 1.21-3.63; p = 0.008) DFS and in 3-year (OR 2.55; 95% CI 1.43-4.54; p = 0.001) and 5-year (OR 2.00; 95% CI 1.17-3.41; p = 0.01) OS was seen in the RT group. The OS benefit was demonstrated in the subgroup analysis of neoadjuvant RT, but not with adjuvant RT. The improvement in OS with neoadjuvant RT was supported by a population-based study from NCDB, while results from two population-based studies investigating adjuvant RT were conflicting.

CONCLUSION

Taking into account the limitations of the studies, our review of evidence suggests a possible role of RT in improving oncologic outcomes of select colon adenocarcinomas. Prospective studies are needed to definitively assess the value of RT for colon cancer.

SPARC, a phase-I trial of pre-operative, margin intensified, stereotactic body radiation therapy for pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Following resection of pancreatic cancer, risk of positive margins and local recurrence remain high, especially for borderline-resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC). We aimed to establish the maximum tolerated dose of a margin-intensified five-fraction stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) regimen designed to treat the region at risk.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a prospective multicentre phase-1 rolling-six dose-escalation study. BRPC patients received pre-operative SBRT, with one dose to the primary tumour and an integrated boost to the region where tumour was in contact with vasculature. Four dose-levels were proposed, with starting dose 30 Gy to primary PTV and 45 Gy to boost volume (PTV_R), in five daily fractions. Primary endpoint was maximum tolerated dose (MTD), defined as highest dose where zero of three or one of six patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT).

RESULTS

Twelve patients were registered, eleven received SBRT. Radiotherapy was well tolerated with all treatment completed as scheduled. Dose was escalated one level up from starting dose without encountering any DLT (prescribed 32.5 Gy PTV, 47.5 Gy PTV_R). Nine serious adverse reactions or events occurred (seven CTCAE Grade 3, two Grade 4). Two patients went on to have surgical resection. Median overall survival for SBRT patients was 8.1 months. The study closed early when it was unable to recruit to schedule.

CONCLUSION

Toxicity of SBRT was low for the two dose-levels that were tested, but MTD was not established. Few patients subsequently underwent resection of pancreatic tumour after SBRT, and it is difficult to draw conclusions regarding the safety or toxicity of these therapies in combination.

Neoadjuvant programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy in resectable non-small cell lung cancer: an open-label, multicenter, single-arm study

Background

Neoadjuvant therapy has significantly improved the 5-year overall survival (OS) of patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The CheckMate 159 trial showed that neoadjuvant therapy with a single-drug programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitor (nivolumab) achieved major pathological response (MPR) and pathological complete response (pCR) in 45% and 15%of participants, respectively. We conducted an open-label single-arm study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant PD-1 inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy in the treatment of resectable NSCLC.

Methods

This study was conducted in a total of 2 hospitals in the Chinese cities of Xi'an and Chongqing, and included eligible patients over 18 years of age with clinically staged IIA-IIIB NSCLC. All patients were scheduled to receive surgery within 4-6 weeks after neoadjuvant treatment (3-4 cycles) consisting of PD-1 inhibitors combined with a conventional chemotherapy regimen on day 1 of each 21-day cycle.

Results

Twenty-three patients, 22 males, and 1 female with just one of them with no smoking habits) were diagnosed with NSCL C in a stage IIA (3 cases), IIB (3 cases), IIIA (8 cases), and IIIB (9cases) and no druggable driver mutations/translocations were addressed to receive neoadjuvant treatment between June 2018 and June 2020. The treatment was well tolerated with just 3 typical immune-related adverse events (hyperthyroidism, hyperglycemia, and rash) recorded. There was a partial response (PR) and stable disease (SD) in 17 (73.9%) and 6 (26.1%) patients, with an overall response rate (ORR) of 73.9% according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST v.1.1). Six of these patients resulted in pCR (30%) while ten of them showed a MPR (50%). Twenty patients underwent surgical resection after treatment, while further 3 refused surgery. Surgical procedure included video-assisted thoracoscopic resection (10 cases), Vinci Robot surgery (4 cases), and thoracotomy in 4 cases while there were secondary compliance-related thoracotomy in two cases. The pathology analysis revealed a R0 in 19 cases (19/20, 95%).

Conclusions

Our results suggest that the neoadjuvant approach with chemotherapy and PD-1 blocking mAbs is safe and active in patients with resectable NSCLC where is associated with a promising high ORR, MPR and pCR.

Emerging concepts in PD-1 checkpoint biology

The PD-1 pathway is a cornerstone in immune regulation. While the PD-1 pathway has received considerable attention for its role in contributing to the maintenance of T cell exhaustion in chronic infection and cancer, the PD-1 pathway plays diverse roles in regulating host immunity beyond T cell exhaustion. Here, we discuss emerging concepts in the PD-1 pathway, including (1) the impact of PD-1 inhibitors on diverse T cell differentiation states including effector and memory T cell development during acute infection, as well as T cell exhaustion during chronic infection and cancer, (2) the role of PD-1 in regulating Treg cells, NK cells, and ILCs, and (3) the functions of PD-L1/B7-1 and PD-L2/RGMb/neogenin interactions. We then discuss the emerging use of neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade in the treatment of early-stage cancers and how the timing of PD-1 blockade may improve clinical outcomes. The diverse binding partners of PD-1 and its associated ligands, broad expression patterns of the receptors and ligands, differential impact of PD-1 modulation on cells depending on location and state of differentiation, and timing of PD-1 blockade add additional layers of complexity to the PD-1 pathway, and are important considerations for improving the efficacy and safety of PD-1 pathway therapeutics.

Bayesian decision making in confirmatory early-stage breast cancer trial

Preoperative or neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy, once reserved for patients with locally advanced breast cancer (BC) in whom the goal was to render breast cancer operable, has become increasingly common. In the early-stage BC neoadjuvant studies, clinical benefits such as event-free survival (EFS), disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) usually take long time to be observed. Pathological complete response (pCR) rate obtained at surgery as an endpoint after the neoadjuvant treatment has been accepted by FDA as a surrogate predictor for long-term time-to-event endpoints to support accelerated approval. Utilizing this early endpoint helps expedite the development of novel therapies in order to fulfill the unmet medical need for certain high-risk or poor prognosis subsets of early-stage BC patients. By applying the correlation between pCR and time-to-event endpoints, an early and informative Go/NoGo decision-making structure can be built with less cost so that it improves the overall clinical development efficiency. We propose a Bayesian hierarchy model procedure that utilizes Bayesian predictive power of EFS in phase III to guide the Go/NoGo decision based on a clinical plausible threshold for the pCR treatment difference in phase II. The model implements a double bootstrap method to estimate the correlation between pCR and EFS in simulated setting. Besides simulation results, a hypothetical example based on the 2-in-1 adaptive design is provided.

Immunotherapy addition to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early triple negative breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

IMPORTANCE

Several randomized trials of neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy in early triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) have been recently reported, showing conflicting results.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, Embase and key oncological meetings for trials of neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy in TNBC. The primary endpoint was pCR, with sub-analyses based on PD-L1 expression and risk of relapse.

RESULTS

Five randomized trials enrolling 1496 TNBC patients were included. We observed a statistically significant association between PD1/PD-L1 blockade addition and pCR (SOR = 1.72, 95 %CI: 1.22-2.42). The benefit was significant in the PD-L1 positive subgroup (SOR = 1.65; 95 %CI: 1.06-2.57). pCR was also significantly increased in the high-risk subgroup (SOR = 2.39; 95 %CI: 1.09-5.22), when restricting to patients receiving an anthracycline-based NACT. We found no significant association between immunotherapy addition and toxicity, and no evidence of publication bias.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of PD1/PD-L1 blockade to NACT significantly improves pCR rates in TNBC patients, particularly in patients at high-risk of relapse.

Does treatment sequence affect outcomes in patients with metaplastic breast cancer?

INTRODUCTION

We compared characteristics and outcomes by treatment sequence among patients with metaplastic breast cancer (MBC), an aggressive subtype.

METHODS

Women ≥18 years old with newly diagnosed Stage I-III MBC from 2003 to 2018 who received any treatment in our health system were identified. Unadjusted overall survival (OS) was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method; the log-rank test was used to compare survival differences between recipients of neoadjuvant (NACT) and adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT).

RESULTS

Of the 91 MBC patients identified, 60 received chemotherapy. NACT recipients (n = 20, median age 46.5 y) were younger than ACT recipients (n = 40, median age 60.5 y, p < 0.001) but similar with regards to race and radiation receipt. There was no significant OS difference between NACT and ACT recipients (log-rank p = 0.15), which remained true when patients were stratified by age (≥50 y vs < 50 y).

CONCLUSIONS

Among MBC patients, NACT recipients were younger than ACT recipients, but there was no survival difference by treatment sequence.

Multimarker scores of Th1 and Th2 immune cellular profiles in peripheral blood predict response and immune related toxicity with CTLA4 blockade and IFNα in melanoma

Neoadjuvant therapy with ipilimumab in combination with high dose IFNα was evaluated in patients with locally/regionally advanced melanoma in a previously reported clinical trial [NCT01608594]. In this study, peripheral immune cell profiling was performed in order to investigate the underlying mechanisms of tumor immune susceptibility and resistance. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from treated patients (N = 28) were collected at baseline and then at 6-weeks, 3-months and 12-months. High complexity (14-color) flow cytometry, designed to detect key immunological biomarkers was used to evaluate the frequencies of immune cell subsets. Statistical significance was determined using R-package employing Kruskal's test. We found that higher levels of Th1 cells at baseline (defined as CD45RA- CCR6- CXCR3+ CCR4-) correlated with the preoperative radiological response (p = 0.007) while higher Th2 cells (defined as CD45RA- CCR6- CXCR3- CCR4+) were associated with progressive disease (p = 0.009). A multimarker score consisting of higher levels of Th1 cells and CD8+ central memory T-cells was associated with pathologic complete response (pCR) (p = 0.041) at surgical resection. On the other hand, high TIM3 expression on T-cells correlated with gross viable tumor (p = 0.047). With regard to immune related toxicity, higher levels of phenotypically naive (defined as CCR7+CD45RA+) and effector memory (defined as CCR7-CD45RO+) CD8+ T-cells (p = 0.014) or lower levels of Th2 cells were associated with lower toxicity (p = 0.024). Furthermore, a multimarker score consisting of higher CD19+ and CD8+ cells was associated with lower toxicity (p = 0.0014). In conclusion, our study yielded mechanistic insights related to the immune impact of CTLA4 blockade and IFNα and potential biomarkers of immune response and toxicity.

Thoracoscopic Vs Open Surgery Following Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation for Clinical N2 Lung Cancer

We evaluated the feasibility of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) following neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (nCCRT) for N2 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We retrospectively reviewed patients with clinical N2 NSCLC who underwent lobectomy and lymph node dissection after nCCRT. The patients were matched using a propensity score based on age, sex, pulmonary function test, histologic type, clinical T factor, and method of N-staging. A total of 385 patients were enrolled between June 2012 and July 2017 (35 VATS, 350 open). After propensity matching (31 VATS, 112 open), the VATS group showed a significantly lower major complication rate (≥ grade II Clavien-Dindo classification; 9.7% vs 30.4%, P = 0.036). No significant differences were found between 2 group of 5-year survival rates (77.1% for the VATS group, 59.9% for the open group; P = 0.276) and recurrence-free survival rates (66.3% for the VATS group, 54.6% for the open group; P = 0.354). In multivariable analysis, VATS did not affect overall survival and recurrence-free survival. VATS was comparable to open thoracotomy in patients with clinical N2 NSCLC after nCCRT without compromising oncologic efficacy.

Impact of Breast Cancer Pretreatment Nodal Burden and Disease Subtype on Axillary Surgical Management

BACKGROUND

The management of clinically node-positive breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has progressed with the potential to avoid the morbidity of axillary lymph node dissection in patients with complete response to therapy. This study addresses the impact of pretreatment nodal burden and tumor subtype on axillary pathologic complete response (AXpCR) in patients treated with NAC to better inform axillary surgical management.

METHODS

A prospective database was reviewed to identify clinically node-positive patients who underwent NAC followed by axillary lymph node dissection. Patients were stratified in accordance with abnormal nodal burden on pretreatment axillary imaging defined as low (1-2 nodes) or high (≥3 nodes), and biologic subtype defined by hormone receptor (HR+, HR-) and HER2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2) status. The primary outcome was AXpCR.

RESULTS

AXpCR was 43% in the study population. There was no difference in AXpCR between low and high nodal burden groups (44% versus 42%, P = 0.87). Subtype correlated to AXpCR (P < 0.001) with the highest rate (78%) in the HR-/HER2+ group. Overall, HER2+ patients had a significantly higher AXpCR than HER2- subtypes (66% versus 28% P < 0.001). HR and HER2 status were also predictive of AXpCR when comparing patient, tumor, and treatment variables.

CONCLUSIONS

Biologic subtype better correlated with rates of AXpCR than nodal burden alone with the highest rates of AXpCR in HER2+ patients. Consideration of tumor biology is more informative than nodal burden when evaluating options for axillary management after NAC.

Recent advances in neoadjuvant immunotherapy for urothelial bladder cancer: What to expect in the near future

Urothelial bladder cancer (UC) is the most common malignancy involving the urinary system and represents a significant health problem. Immunotherapy has been used for decades for UC with intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) set as the standard of care for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has completely transformed the treatment landscape of bladder cancer enabling to expand the treatment strategies. Novel ICIs have successfully shown improved outcomes on metastatic disease to such an extent that the standard of care paradigm has changed leading to the development of different trials with the aim of determining whether ICIs may have a role in early disease. The localized muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) scenario remains challenging since the recurrence rate continues to be high despite all therapeutic efforts. This article will review the current experience of ICIs in the neoadjuvant setting of UC, the clinical trials landscape and finally, an insight of what to expect in the immediate and mid-term future.