Comprehensive characterization of IFNγ signaling in acute myeloid leukemia reveals prognostic and therapeutic strategies

Interferon gamma (IFNγ) is a critical cytokine known for its diverse roles in immune regulation, inflammation, and tumor surveillance. However, while IFNγ levels were elevated in sera of most newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients, its complex interplay in AML remains insufficiently understood. We aim to characterize these complex interactions through comprehensive bulk and single-cell approaches in bone marrow of newly diagnosed AML patients. We identify monocytic AML as having a unique microenvironment characterized by IFNγ producing T and NK cells, high IFNγ signaling, and immunosuppressive features. IFNγ signaling score strongly correlates with venetoclax resistance in primary AML patient cells. Additionally, IFNγ treatment of primary AML patient cells increased venetoclax resistance. Lastly, a parsimonious 47-gene IFNγ score demonstrates robust prognostic value. In summary, our findings suggest that inhibiting IFNγ is a potential treatment strategy to overcoming venetoclax resistance and immune evasion in AML patients.

Venetoclax with decitabine or azacitidine in relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia

Relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is associated with poor outcomes and resistance to therapy. The addition of venetoclax, a BCL-2 antagonist, to lower-intensity therapies results in improved survival in the first-line setting compared to monotherapy with a hypomethylating agent or low-dose cytarabine. Despite this, much remains unknown about the performance of venetoclax with a hypomethylating agent following the first-line setting. Additionally, while the ELN 2022 guidelines appear to improve the prognostication of AML, clarification is needed to determine how the revision applies to lower-intensity strategies. To investigate this, we retrospectively analyzed the performance of venetoclax with decitabine or azacitidine in relapsed or refractory AML under the ELN 2022 guidelines. We demonstrated that the ELN 2022 revision is not optimized for lower-intensity venetoclax-based strategies. To refine the prognostication schema, we showed significantly improved response and survival benefits for patients with mutated NPM1 and IDH. Relatively, patients with mutated NRAS, KRAS, and FLT3-ITD were associated with inferior response and survival. Furthermore, there is an unmet clinical need for tools to improve the selection of lower-intensity therapy candidates with borderline functional status. Using an incremental survival computation method, we discovered that a CCI score threshold of 5 distinguishes patients at an elevated risk of death. Together, these novel findings highlight areas of refinement to improve survival in relapsed or refractory AML.

[Efficacy and safety analysis of venetoclax combined with hypomethylating agents for the treatment of higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes in the real world]

Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of combining venetoclax (VEN) with hypomethylated drugs (HMA) in the treatment of higher-risk (IPSS-R score >3.5) myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) . Methods: From March 2021 to December 2022, forty-five MDS patients with intermediate and high risk were treated with VEN in combination with HMAs. Clinical data were collected and analyzed retrospectively, including gender, age, MDS subtype, IPSS-R score, treatment regimen, and efficacy, etc. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression model were used to analyze univariate and multivariate of survival prognosis. Results: ①Forty-five patients with MDS, including ninety-one percent were classified as high or very high risk. According to the 2023 consensus proposal for revised International Working Group response criteria for higher-risk MDS, the overall response rate (ORR) was 62.2% (28/45), with the complete response rate (CR) was 33.3% (15/45). For twenty-five naïve MDS, the ORR was 68% (17/25) and the CR rate was 32% (8/25). In nonfirst-line patients, the ORR and CR were 55% (11/20) and 35% (7/20) respectively. The median cycle to best response was 1 (1-4). ②With a median followup of 189 days, the median overall survival (OS) time was 499 (95% confidence interval, 287-711) days, and most patients died from disease progression. Responders had a significantly better median OS time than nonresponders (499 days vs 228 days, P<0.001). Multifactor analysis revealed that IPSS-R score and response to treatment were independent prognostic factors for OS; the presence of SETBP1 gene mutations was associated with a longer hospital stay (51.5 days vs 27 days, P=0.017) . Conclusions: There is clinical benefit of venetoclax in combination with hypomethylated agents in patients with higher-risk MDS, but adverse events such as severe hypocytopenia during treatment should be avoided.

Tumor lysis syndrome in patients with acute myeloid leukemia treated with venetoclax and hypomethylating agents with or without dose ramp-up

Venetoclax with hypomethylating agents (HMAs) is an important treatment for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who cannot tolerate intensive chemotherapy. However, there is limited data on the safety of venetoclax without a dose ramp-up in patients with AML. A retrospective cohort analysis of patients with AML treated with HMA/venetoclax (HMA/Ven) with or without a dose ramp-up, or HMA alone from 6/30/2014-8/22/2022 was conducted. The primary endpoint was the incidence of laboratory and/or clinical tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) by day 10. Of 225 patients, 111 patients received HMA alone or HMA/Ven with a dose ramp-up and 114 received HMA/Ven with no dose ramp-up. The incidence of TLS was similar between the control and no dose ramp-up groups, with rates of 5.4% and 5.3% respectively (p = 0.962). TLS incidence was comparable in patients with and without a dose ramp-up, suggesting that a dose ramp-up may not be mandatory in patients with AML.

Pharmacokinetic Consideration of Venetoclax in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients: A Potential Candidate for TDM? A Short Communication

BACKGROUND

Venetoclax (VNX)-based regimens have demonstrated significantly favorable outcomes in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and are now becoming the standard treatment. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors are administered at a fixed dose, irrespective of body surface area or weight. For such orally targeted therapies, real-world data have highlighted a larger pharmacokinetic (PK) interindividual variability (IIV) than expected. Even if VNX PKs have been well characterized and described in the literature, only 1 clinical trial-based PK study has been conducted in patients with AML. This study aimed to evaluate the PK of VNX in AML patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed all patients treated with a combination of VNX-azacitidine between January and July 2022 at our center, using at least 1 available VNX blood sample. Based on a previously published population PK model, individual PK parameters were estimated to evaluate the exposure and IIV.

RESULTS

and Discussion. Twenty patients received VNX in combination with azacitidine, according to the PK data. A total of 93 plasma concentrations were collected. The dose of VNX was 400 mg, except in 7 patients who received concomitant posaconazole (VNX 70 mg). The patients' weight ranged from 49 kg to 108 kg (mean = 78 kg). Mean individual clearance was 13.5 ± 9.4 L/h with mean individual daily area under the concentration-time curves of 35.8 mg.h/L with significant IIV (coefficient of variation = 41.1%). Ten patients were still alive (8 in complete response), but all experienced at least 1 hematological toxicity of grade ≥ 3.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the observed large PK variability in the data from our real-world AML patients, the risk of drug interactions and the recommended fixed-dosage regimen of VNX therapeutic drug monitoring may be useful.

Absence of BTK, BCL2, and PLCG2 Mutations in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Relapsing after First-Line Treatment with Fixed-Duration Ibrutinib plus Venetoclax

PURPOSE

Mutations in BTK, PLCG2, and BCL2 have been reported in patients with progressive disease (PD) on continuous single-agent BTK or BCL2 inhibitor treatment. We tested for these mutations in samples from patients with PD after completion of first-line treatment with fixed-duration ibrutinib plus venetoclax for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) in the phase II CAPTIVATE study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 191 patients completed fixed-duration ibrutinib plus venetoclax (three cycles of ibrutinib then 12-13 cycles of ibrutinib plus venetoclax). Genomic risk features [del(11q), del(13q), del(17p), trisomy 12, complex karyotype, unmutated IGHV, TP53 mutated] and mutations in genes recurrently mutated in CLL (ATM, BIRC3, BRAF, CHD2, EZH2, FBXW7, MYD88, NOTCH1, POT1, RPS15, SF3B1, XPO1) were assessed at baseline in patients with and without PD at data cutoff; gene variants and resistance-associated mutations in BTK, PLCG2, or BCL2 were evaluated at PD.

RESULTS

Of 191 patients completing fixed-duration ibrutinib plus venetoclax, with median follow-up of 38.9 months, 29 (15%) developed PD. No baseline risk feature or gene mutation was significantly associated with development of PD. No previously reported resistance-associated mutations in BTK, PLCG2, or BCL2 were detected at PD in 25 patients with available samples. Of the 29 patients with PD, 19 have required retreatment (single-agent ibrutinib, n = 16, or ibrutinib plus venetoclax, n = 3); 17 achieved partial response or better, 1 achieved stable disease, and 1 is pending response assessment.

CONCLUSIONS

First-line fixed-duration combination treatment with ibrutinib plus venetoclax may mitigate development of resistance mechanisms associated with continuous single-agent targeted therapies, allowing for effective retreatment. See related commentary by Al-Sawaf and Davids, p. 471.

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Therapy Guided by Measurable Residual Disease

BACKGROUND

The combination of ibrutinib and venetoclax has been shown to improve outcomes in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) as compared with chemoimmunotherapy. Whether ibrutinib-venetoclax and personalization of treatment duration according to measurable residual disease (MRD) is more effective than fludarabine-cyclophosphamide-rituximab (FCR) is unclear.

METHODS

In this phase 3, multicenter, randomized, controlled, open-label platform trial involving patients with untreated CLL, we compared ibrutinib-venetoclax and ibrutinib monotherapy with FCR. In the ibrutinib-venetoclax group, after 2 months of ibrutinib, venetoclax was added for up to 6 years of therapy. The duration of ibrutinib-venetoclax therapy was defined by MRD assessed in peripheral blood and bone marrow and was double the time taken to achieve undetectable MRD. The primary end point was progression-free survival in the ibrutinib-venetoclax group as compared with the FCR group, results that are reported here. Key secondary end points were overall survival, response, MRD, and safety.

RESULTS

A total of 523 patients were randomly assigned to the ibrutinib-venetoclax group or the FCR group. At a median of 43.7 months, disease progression or death had occurred in 12 patients in the ibrutinib-venetoclax group and 75 patients in the FCR group (hazard ratio, 0.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.07 to 0.24; P<0.001). Death occurred in 9 patients in the ibrutinib-venetoclax group and 25 patients in the FCR group (hazard ratio, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.67). At 3 years, 58.0% of the patients in the ibrutinib-venetoclax group had stopped therapy owing to undetectable MRD. After 5 years of ibrutinib-venetoclax therapy, 65.9% of the patients had undetectable MRD in the bone marrow and 92.7% had undetectable MRD in the peripheral blood. The risk of infection was similar in the ibrutinib-venetoclax group and the FCR group. The percentage of patients with cardiac serious adverse events was higher in the ibrutinib-venetoclax group than in the FCR group (10.7% vs. 0.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

MRD-directed ibrutinib-venetoclax improved progression-free survival as compared with FCR, and results for overall survival also favored ibrutinib-venetoclax. (Funded by Cancer Research UK and others; FLAIR ISRCTN Registry number, ISRCTN01844152; EudraCT number, 2013-001944-76.).

Single-institution experience of venetoclax combined with azacitidine in newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia patients

To retrospectively analyze the efficacy and safety of venetoclax combined with azacitidine (VEN + AZA) in the treatment of elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia. The clinical data for 57 AML patients treated with the VEN + AZA regimen from December 2019 to November 2022 in the Department of Hematology, General Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, were collected. Of the 57 patients included in this study, the mean age of onset was 69.89 (±8.88) years. The median follow-up time was 8.57 months, and the median OS time was 11.50 months. The ORR, CR rate, and MRD (<0.1%) negativity rate were 87.5%, 68.8%, and 58.3%, respectively. The median OS was longer in patients who achieved CR/CRi and who were MRD-negative than in those who did not. MRD negativity was less likely to be achieved in patients aged ≥75 years and with ECOG scores of ≥3. Compared to traditional intensive chemotherapy, MRD negative was achieved more quickly with VEN + AZA regimens in patients with newly diagnosed AML. Advanced age and ECOG score were risk factors for negative MRD. The dominant adverse reactions were hematological adverse events. VEN + AZA regimens in elderly unfit patients with previously untreated newly diagnosed AML have sufficient efficacy and safety.

Biomarkers of Response to Venetoclax Therapy in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Recent progress in the use of massive sequencing technologies has greatly enhanced our understanding of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) pathology. This knowledge has in turn driven the development of targeted therapies, such as venetoclax, a BCL-2 inhibitor approved for use in combination with azacitidine, decitabine, or low-dose cytarabine for the treatment of newly diagnosed adult patients with AML who are not eligible for intensive chemotherapy. However, a significant number of AML patients still face the challenge of disease relapse. In this review, we will explore biomarkers that may predict disease progression in patients receiving venetoclax-based therapy, considering both clinical factors and genetic changes. Despite the many advances, we conclude that the identification of molecular profiles for AML patients who will respond optimally to venetoclax therapy remains an unmet clinical need.

Venetoclax-based low intensity therapy in molecular failure of NPM1-mutated AML

ABSTRACT

Molecular failure in NPM1-mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) inevitably progresses to frank relapse if untreated. Recently published small case series show that venetoclax combined with low-dose cytarabine or azacitidine can reduce or eliminate measurable residual disease (MRD). Here, we report on an international multicenter cohort of 79 patients treated for molecular failure with venetoclax combinations and report an overall molecular response (≥1-log reduction in MRD) in 66 patients (84%) and MRD negativity in 56 (71%). Eighteen of 79 patients (23%) required hospitalization, and no deaths were reported during treatment. Forty-one patients were bridged to allogeneic transplant with no further therapy, and 25 of 41 were MRD negative assessed by reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction before transplant. Overall survival (OS) for the whole cohort at 2 years was 67%, event-free survival (EFS) was 45%, and in responding patients, there was no difference in survival in those who received a transplant using time-dependent analysis. Presence of FLT3-ITD mutation was associated with a lower response rate (64 vs 91%; P < .01), worse OS (hazard ratio [HR], 2.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-5.86; P = .036), and EFS (HR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.06-3.28; P = .03). Eighteen of 35 patients who did not undergo transplant became MRD negative and stopped treatment after a median of 10 months, with 2-year molecular relapse free survival of 62% from the end of treatment. Venetoclax-based low intensive chemotherapy is a potentially effective treatment for molecular relapse in NPM1-mutated AML, either as a bridge to transplant or as definitive therapy.

Budget impact analysis of venetoclax for the management of acute myeloid leukemia from the perspective of the social security and the private sector in Argentina

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to estimate the budget impact of the incorporation of venetoclax for the treatment of patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) over 75 years of age or those with comorbidities and contraindications for the use of intensive chemotherapy, from the perspective of the social security and the private third-party payers in Argentina.

METHODS

A budget impact model was adapted to estimate the cost difference between the current scenario (azacitidine, decitabine and low doses of cytarabine) and the new scenario (incorporation of venetoclax) for a third-party payer over a time horizon of three years. Input parameters were obtained from a literature review, validated or complemented by expert opinion using a modified Panel Delphi approach. All direct medical costs were estimated by the micro-costing approach and were expressed in US dollars (USD) as of September 2020 (1 USD = 76.18 Argentine pesos).

RESULTS

For a third-party payer with a cohort of 1,000,000 individuals covered, incorporating venetoclax was associated with an average budget impact per-member per-month (PMPM) of $0.11 USD for the social security sector and $0.07 USD for the private sector. The duration of treatment with venetoclax was the most influential parameter in the budget impact results.

CONCLUSION

The introduction of venetoclax was associated with a positive and slight budget impact. These findings are informative to support policy decisions aimed to expand the current treatment landscape of AML.

Integrated epigenetic and transcriptional single-cell analysis of t(11;14) multiple myeloma and its BCL2 dependency

ABSTRACT

The translocation t(11;14) occurs in 20% of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and results in the upregulation of CCND1. Nearly two-thirds of t(11;14) MM cells are BCL2 primed and highly responsive to the oral BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax. Although it is evident that this unique sensitivity to venetoclax depends on the Bcl-2 homology domain 3- proapoptotic protein priming of BCL2, the biology underlying t(11;14) MM dependency on BCL2 is poorly defined. Importantly, the epigenetic regulation of t(11;14) transcriptomes and its impact on gene regulation and clinical response to venetoclax remain elusive. In this study, by integrating assay for transposase-accessible chromatin by sequencing (ATAC-seq) and RNA-seq at the single-cell level in primary MM samples, we have defined the epigenetic regulome and transcriptome associated with t(11;14) MM. A B-cell-like epigenetic signature was enriched in t(11;14) MM, confirming its phylogeny link to B-cell rather than plasma cell biology. Of note, a loss of a B-cell-like epigenetic signature with a gain of canonical plasma cell transcription factors was observed at the time of resistance to venetoclax. In addition, MCL1 and BCL2L1 copy number gains and structural rearrangements were linked to venetoclax resistance in patients with t(11;14) MM. To date, this is the first study in which both single-cell (sc) ATAC-seq and scRNA-seq analysis are integrated into primary MM cells to obtain a deeper resolution of the epigenetic regulome and transcriptome associated with t(11;14) MM biology and venetoclax resistance.

Hypomethylating agent decitabine sensitizes diffuse large B-cell lymphoma to venetoclax

Despite recent advances in the therapy of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), many patients are still not cured. Therefore, new therapeutic strategies are needed. The anti-apoptotic B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL2) gene is commonly dysregulated in DLBCL due to various mechanisms such as chromosomal translocation t(14;18)(q32;q21) and copy number alterations; however, targeting BCL-2 with the selective inhibitor, venetoclax, led to response in only a minority of patients. Thus, we sought to identify a rational combination partner of venetoclax to improve its activity against DLBCL cells. Utilizing a functional assay, dynamic BH3 profiling, we found that the DNA hypomethylating agent decitabine increased mitochondrial apoptotic priming and BCL-2 dependence in DLBCL cells. RNA-sequencing analysis revealed that decitabine suppressed the pro-survival PI3K-AKT pathway and altered the mitochondria membrane composition in DLBCL cell lines. Additionally, it induced a DNA damage response and increased BAX and BAK activities. The combination of decitabine and venetoclax synergistically suppressed proliferation of DLBCL cells both in vitro and in vivo in a DLBCL cell line-derived xenograft mouse model. Our study suggests that decitabine plus venetoclax is a promising combination to explore clinically in DLBCL.

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions: Understanding and Overcoming Venetoclax Resistance in Hematologic Malignancies

The discovery of Venetoclax (VEN) has transformed the therapeutic landscape of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). However, the response is heterogeneous with 10% to 50% of newly diagnosed AML patients not responding to hypomethylating agent (HMA) and VEN. Furthermore, up to 40% of responding patients relapse shortly. This review discusses the mechanism of action of Venetoclax and the major mechanisms of inherent and acquired resistance to VEN. VEN is highly specific to BCL-2 binding, as such other antiapoptotic proteins in BCL-2 family induce resistance. These antiapoptotic proteins can also be upregulated via a number of compensatory cell signaling pathways including PI3K/AKT/mTOR, the MAPK/ERK pathway, and mutant FLT3-ITD. Mutations can occur in BCL-2 and BAX proteins, or they can be silenced by TP53 mutations and other epigenetic changes. Changes to mitochondrial structure and metabolism can induce resistance. Key metabolic regulators include OXPHOS and alternative amino acid metabolism. Finally microenvironmental factors can influence VEN responses. This paper evaluates subsets of AML by differentiation, histology, cytogenetics and molecular markers and their different responses to VEN; with spliceosome mutations, ASXL1, NPM1 and IDH1/2 being favorable while others such as FLT3, TP53 and BCL-2 mutations being less responsive. Currently intensive multiagent chemotherapy and Venetoclax combinations such as 7+3+VEN are favored in fit younger AML patients. However, with resistant patients' subsets targeted combination therapies are becoming an increasingly attractive option. We explore the incorporation of non-BCL-2 inhibitors, next-generation BCL-2 and multi-protein agents, other inhibitors most prominently FLT-3 inhibitors in addition to Venetoclax, and other novel approaches for resolving Venetoclax resistance.

Electron transport chain and mTOR inhibition synergistically decrease CD40 signaling and counteract venetoclax resistance in chronic lymphocytic leukemia

CD40 signaling upregulates BCL-XL and MCL-1 expression in the chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) lymph node microenvironment, affording resistance to the BCL-2 inhibitor, venetoclax. Venetoclax resistance in the therapeutic setting and after long-term laboratory selection has been linked to metabolic alterations, but the underlying mechanism(s) are unknown. We aimed here to discover how CD40 stimulation as a model for tumor microenvironment-mediated metabolic changes, affects venetoclax sensitivity/resistance. CD40 stimulation increased oxidative phosphorylation and glycolysis, but only inhibition of oxidative phosphorylation countered venetoclax resistance. Furthermore, blocking mitochondrial import of pyruvate, glutamine or fatty acids affected CLL metabolism, but did not prevent CD40-mediated resistance to venetoclax. In contrast, inhibition of the electron transport chain (ETC) at complex I, III or V attenuated CLL activation and ATP production, and downregulated MCL-1 and BCL-XL, correlating with reduced CD40 surface expression. Moreover, ETC inhibition equaled mTOR1/2 but not mTOR1 inhibition alone for venetoclax resistance, and all three pathways were linked to control of general protein translation. In line with this, ETC plus mTOR inhibition synergistically counteracted venetoclax resistance. These findings link oxidative CLL metabolism to CD40 expression and cellular signaling, and may hold clinical potential.

Venetoclax and Hypomethylating Agent Combination in Myeloid Malignancies: Mechanisms of Synergy and Challenges of Resistance

There has been a widespread adoption of hypomethylating agents (HMA: 5-Azacytidine (5-Aza)/decitabine) and venetoclax (Ven) for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML); however, the mechanisms behind the combination's synergy are poorly understood. Monotherapy often encounters resistance, leading to suboptimal outcomes; however, the combination of HMA and Ven has demonstrated substantial improvements in treatment responses. This study elucidates multiple synergistic pathways contributing to this enhanced therapeutic effect. Key mechanisms include HMA-mediated downregulation of anti-apoptotic proteins, notably MCL-1, and the priming of cells for Ven through the induction of genes encoding pro-apoptotic proteins such as Noxa. Moreover, Ven induces sensitization to HMA, induces overcoming resistance by inhibiting the DHODH enzyme, and disrupts antioxidant pathways (Nrf2) induced by HMA. The combination further disrupts oxidative phosphorylation in leukemia stem cells, amplifying the therapeutic impact. Remarkably, clinical studies have revealed a favorable response, particularly in patients harboring specific mutations, such as IDH1/2, NPM1, CEBPA, or ASXL1. This prompts future studies to explore the nuanced underpinnings of these synergistic mechanisms in AML patients with these molecular signatures.

Targeting S100A9 protein affects mTOR-ER stress signaling and increases venetoclax sensitivity in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous disease with limited treatment options and a high demand for novel targeted therapies. Since myeloid-related protein S100A9 is abundantly expressed in AML, we aimed to unravel the therapeutic impact and underlying mechanisms of targeting both intracellular and extracellular S100A9 protein in AML cell lines and primary patient samples. S100A9 silencing in AML cell lines resulted in increased apoptosis and reduced AML cell viability and proliferation. These therapeutic effects were associated with a decrease in mTOR and endoplasmic reticulum stress signaling. Comparable results on AML cell proliferation and mTOR signaling could be observed using the clinically available S100A9 inhibitor tasquinimod. Interestingly, while siRNA-mediated targeting of S100A9 affected both extracellular acidification and mitochondrial metabolism, tasquinimod only affected the mitochondrial function of AML cells. Finally, we found that S100A9-targeting approaches could significantly increase venetoclax sensitivity in AML cells, which was associated with a downregulation of BCL-2 and c-MYC in the combination group compared to single agent therapy. This study identifies S100A9 as a novel molecular target to treat AML and supports the therapeutic evaluation of tasquinimod in venetoclax-based regimens for AML patients.