Results of the first U.S. double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter clinical study in asthma with pranlukast, a novel leukotriene receptor antagonist

Characterization of the human cysteinyl leukotriene CysLT1 receptor

The cysteinyl leukotrienes-leukotriene C4(LTC4), leukotriene D4(LTD4) and leukotriene E4(LTE4)-are important mediators of human bronchial asthma. Pharmacological studies have determined that cysteinyl leukotrienes activate at least two receptors, designated CysLT1 and CysLT2. The CysLT1-selective antagonists, such as montelukast (Singulair), zafirlukast (Accolate) and pranlukast (Onon), are important in the treatment of asthma. Previous biochemical characterization of CysLT1 antagonists and the CysLT1 receptor has been in membrane preparations from tissues enriched for this receptor. Here we report the molecular and pharmacological characterization of the cloned human CysLT1 receptor. We describe the functional activation (calcium mobilization) of this receptor by LTD4 and LTC4, and competition for radiolabelled LTD4 binding to this receptor by the cysteinyl leukotrienes and three structurally distinct classes of CysLT1-receptor antagonists. We detected CysLT1-receptor messenger RNA in spleen, peripheral blood leukocytes and lung. In normal human lung, expression of the CysLT1-receptor mRNA was confined to smooth muscle cells and tissue macrophages. Finally, we mapped the human CysLT1-receptor gene to the X chromosome.

New perspectives for asthma treatment: anti-leukotriene drugs

Leukotrienes are synthesized by different cells, including eosinophils, neutrophils, basophils, lymphocytes, macrophages, and mast cells. Cysteinyl leukotrienes (LTC4, LTD4, and LTE4) are the most important leukotrienes in the pathogenesis of asthma. Pharmacologically, there are two different ways of blocking the action of leukotrienes: inhibiting their production by blocking 5-lipoxygenase or its activating protein, 5-lipoxygenase-activating protein (FLAP), (inhibitors) or by blocking their receptors (antagonists). The available antagonists are, for the moment, directed against the one receptor demonstrated to play a role in asthma symptoms, CysLT1, and they act in a competitive way. The only marketed 5-lipoxygenase inhibitor is zileuton (Zyflo). CysLT1 antagonists, currently on the pharmaceutical market in some countries, are zafirlukast (Accolate), pranlukast (Ultair, Onon), and montelukast (Singulair). Undoubtedly, drugs acting on leukotrienes constitute a new pharmacologic class in the therapeutic armamentarium for the management of asthma. From the pediatric point of view, montelukast is currently the most interesting drug of the group to date because of published trials in patients as young as 6 yr of age. At present, zafirlukast is only approved for use in patients 12 yr of age and older, although we understand that applications are likely to extend the age range into childhood shortly. However, more experience is necessary to establish a definite place for both leukotrienes in the step-by-step asthma treatment. New comparative studies (with sodium cromoglycate and inhaled steroids), which will probably be published in the near future, as well as studies on the use of montelukast in the treatment of children under 6 yr of age will add crucial information to our knowledge, and help to identify an appropriate use in the therapeutic algorithm. Montelukast will not be a substitute for inhaled corticosteroids or beta-agonists, although it may act as a 'sparing drug' (which might help tapering of steroids in some instances). Its role in exercise-induced asthma seems promising. Although its more widespread use could highlight low-frequency adverse effects, its apparent excellent tolerability is an additional advantage for the drug. Patients' preference for a twice-daily dosage over the inhaled medication, resulting in a better compliance, is relatively well established, at least for zafirlukast in adults, and these findings can probably be extended to montelukast, which only requires once-daily dosing in children.

The prospects for long-term intervention in asthma with antileukotrienes

The antileukotriene drugs are the first new therapeutic agents approved for the treatment of asthma in more than 20 years. The currently available compounds are orally active and either prevent the cysteinyl leukotrienes from binding to and activating the cysLT-1 receptor in the lung (leukotriene receptor antagonists, LTRAs) or inhibit leukotriene synthesis (leukotriene synthesis inhibitors, LTSIs). The antileukotrienes acutely bronchodilate the airways of patients with baseline bronchoconstriction, although usually not as well as beta-agonists. When used regularly they produce rapid improvements of pulmonary function and symptoms in patients with mild-to-moderate asthma, and probably of those with more severe asthma as well, which persists for the duration of treatment. Yet, individual responses to the antileukotrienes are variable and not predictable based on clinical criteria. Recent studies suggest they reduce asthmatic airway inflammation. The few comparator studies with other asthma medications indicate they are equal or more effective than cromolyn but equal or less effective than low-to-moderate doses of inhaled corticosteroids. Initial experience with the antileukotrienes reveals limited toxicity and a favourable therapeutic-to-toxic ratio. The exact role of the antileukotrienes in the treatment of asthma remains to be determined, as does the relative potency of the various agents.

A risk-benefit assessment of antileukotrienes in asthma

The antileukotriene drugs are the first new therapeutic agents approved for the treatment of asthma in more than 20 years. The currently available compounds are orally active and either prevent the cysteinyl leukotrienes from binding to and activating the cysLT-1 receptor in the lung (leukotriene receptor antagonists) or inhibit leukotriene synthesis (leukotriene synthesis inhibitors). Studies performed in individuals without asthma and patients with asthma reveal that antileukotrienes prevent the bronchoconstriction produced by exercise, cold-air, allergen, aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) and sulphur dioxide. Except for the setting of aspirin sensitivity where the antileukotrienes are nearly uniformly effective, individual responses to them are variable with complete protection in some, no protection in others and a modest degree of protection in the majority. The antileukotrienes bronchodilate the airways of patients with baseline bronchoconstriction, although usually not as well as beta-agonists. When given for weeks to months they rapidly improve pulmonary function and symptoms in patients with mild-to-moderate asthma, and probably in patients with more severe asthma as well, and these improvements persist for the duration of treatment. Here too, their beneficial effects are variable and not predictable based on clinical criteria. Recent studies suggest they can reduce asthma-induced airway inflammation and are equal or more effective than sodium cromoglycate, but equal or less effective than low-to-moderate dosages of inhaled corticosteroids. Initial experience with the antileukotrienes reveals limited toxicity and what appears to be a favourable therapeutic-to-toxic ratio. However, exposure of more patients with differing characteristics for longer periods of time is needed to substantiate this initial impression. The exact role of the antileukotrienes in the treatment of asthma remains to be determined, as does the relative potency of the various agents.

Pranlukast, a cysteinyl leukotriene receptor antagonist, attenuates allergen-induced early- and late-phase bronchoconstriction and airway hyperresponsiveness in asthmatic subjects

BACKGROUND

The cysteinyl leukotrienes (cysLTs) have been implicated in the pathogenesis of allergen-induced airway responses. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of pretreatment with the cysLT receptor antagonist pranlukast on allergen-induced early asthmatic responses (EARs) and late asthmatic responses (LARs) and on allergen-induced airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR).

METHODS

Ten atopic, nonsmoking patients with mild asthma and previously demonstrated early- and late-phase allergen-induced asthmatic responses participated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study, comparing treatment with either 450 mg pranlukast given twice daily or placebo for 5.5 days. A methacholine challenge was performed before administration of medication, and the result was expressed as the PC20. An allergen inhalation challenge was performed on the morning of the fifth day of treatment 2 hours after administration of medication. Methacholine challenges were also performed 2 hours after medication on days 4 and 6 (24 hours before and 24 hours after allergen administration) to examine allergen-induced AHR.

RESULTS

Pranlukast attenuated allergen-induced early responses, late responses, and AHR. The mean (SEM) maximal percent fall in FEV1 from baseline during the early response was 30.0% (5.1%) during placebo treatment and 15.5% (3.5%) during pranlukast treatment (mean difference, 14.5%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.3 to 23.7; P = .007), with a mean protection afforded by pranlukast of 48.3%. The mean maximal percent fall in FEV1 during the late response was 34.7% (5.3%) during placebo treatment and 24.0% (4.4%) during pranlukast treatment (mean difference, 10.7%; 95% CI, 4.1 to 17.3; P = .006), with a mean protection afforded by pranlukast of 30.8%. The mean allergen-induced shift in PC20 was -1.76 (0.32) doubling doses during placebo treatment and -0.38 (0.31) doubling doses during pranlukast treatment (mean difference, -1.38 doubling doses; 95% CI, 0.44 to 2.32; P = .012), with a mean protection afforded by pranlukast of 78.4%.

CONCLUSION

These results demonstrate that pranlukast can attenuate allergen-induced early and late airways responses and AHR and adds further support for an important role for the cysLTs in mediating allergen-induced asthmatic responses.

One airway, one disease

The prevalence of asthma and allergic rhinitis is increasing in the general population, and a high proportion of new patients have coexisting upper and lower airway disease. Estimates show that 60 to 78% of patients who have asthma have coexisting allergic rhinitis. During the past decade, our understanding of asthma and allergic rhinitis has evolved. The historic perspective of these allergen-induced disorders as distinct and separate entities is being displaced by current thinking that they are described better as a continuum of inflammation involving one common airway. Therefore, traditional therapies originally indicated for allergic rhinitis and asthma are being reassessed to explore their potential utility in both upper and lower airway diseases. Recently, there has been a renewed interest in the role that histamines play in lower airway disease, and interest is increasing in the theory that leukotrienes, which are far more potent inflammatory mediators than histamines, play a role in upper airway disease. Given the pivotal role that leukotrienes play as potent inflammatory mediators in the pathophysiologic state of inflammation of both airways, leukotriene receptor antagonists recently have emerged as important therapeutic advances that have potential clinical utility in both asthma and allergic rhinitis.

Worldwide clinical experience with the first marketed leukotriene receptor antagonist

Pranlukast (SB 205312, ONO-1078) is an orally active, potent, selective blocker of peptidyl-leukotriene receptors. Pranlukast has been studied in a worldwide clinical development program and recently was approved in Japan for the treatment of asthma. This worldwide experience includes a pivotal safety and efficacy study conducted in Japan, a leukotriene D4 (LTD4) challenge study conducted in Europe, and two safety, tolerability, and clinical activity studies conducted in Europe and North America. The pivotal study was a randomized, double-blind, 8-week comparison of pranlukast, 225 mg bid, and azelastine, 2 mg bid. Improvements in asthma symptom scores, morning and evening peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), and a decreased need for bronchodilators and corticosteroids in the pranlukast-treated group were statistically significant when compared with those in the azelastine-treated group. The most common adverse experiences were GI. The European challenge study evaluated the ability of 5-day therapy with pranlukast, 450 mg bid, to block the bronchoconstrictor effect of inhaled LTD4. A single dose of pranlukast resulted in a 10.6-fold increase in the concentration of LTD4 required to produce a 35% decrease in specific airways conduction; following 5 days of therapy, this increased to 25.9-fold. The two safety, tolerability, and clinical activity studies were randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 4-week evaluations of pranlukast, 225 to 450 mg bid. Improvements in FEV1, PEFR, and asthma symptoms were noted. Ongoing studies will define further the role of pranlukast as a treatment for asthma and allergic rhinitis.