Combination chemotherapy with mastectomy or radiotherapy for stage III breast carcinoma: a Cancer and Leukemia Group B study

Possibility of conservative local treatment after combined chemotherapy and preoperative irradiation for locally advanced noninflammatory breast cancer

PURPOSE

The aims of this prospective study were to evaluate the outcome and the possibility of breast conservation therapy for patients with locally advanced noninflammatory breast cancer after primary chemotherapy followed by external preoperative irradiation.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between April 1982 and June 1990, 97 patients with locally advanced nonmetastatic and noninflammatory breast cancer were treated. The median follow-up was 93 months from the beginning of treatment. The induction treatment consisted of four courses of chemotherapy (doxorubicin, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, 5-fluorouracil) followed by preoperative irradiation (45 Gy to the breast and nodal areas). A fifth course of chemotherapy was given after irradiation therapy. Three different loco-regional approaches were proposed, depending on the tumoral response. In 37 patients (38%) with residual tumor larger than 3 cm in diameter or located behind the nipple or with bifocal tumors, mastectomy and axillary dissection were performed. Sixty other patients (62%) benefited from conservative treatment: 33 patients (34%) achieved complete remission and no surgery was done but additional radiation boost was given to the initial tumor bed; 27 patients (28%) who had a residual mass less than or equal to 3 cm in diameter were treated by wide excision and axillary dissection followed by a boost to the excision site. After completion of local therapy, all patients received a sixth course of chemotherapy. A maintenance adjuvant chemotherapy regimen without anthracycline was prescribed (12 monthly cycles).

RESULTS

The 5-year actuarial loco-regional relapse rate was 16% after radiotherapy alone, 16% following wide excision and radiotherapy, and 5.4% following mastectomy. The 5-year loco-regional relapse rate was significantly higher after conservative local treatment (wide excision and radiotherapy, and radiotherapy alone) than after mastectomy (p= 0.04). After conservative local treatment, the 5-year breast conserving rate of patients with loco-regional disease-free status was 84%. For all patients included in this study, the 5-year breast-conserving rate of those who were loco-regional disease-free was 52%. In multivariate analysis, the possibility of breast conservative treatment was significantly related to the initial tumor size and age (more conservative treatment for tumor size < 6cm and age < 50 years). Five- and 10-year overall survival rates and disease-free survival rates were 80, 69, 73, and 61% respectively. Five- and 10-year overall survival rates were not influenced by the local treatment (conservative vs. nonconservative local treatment, p = 0.9). On the other hand, local failure significantly decreased the 5- and 10-year overall survival rates (p , 0.0001). In multivariate analysis, three factors had a significant impact on overall survival and disease-free survival: tumor response after induction chemotherapy, initial tumor size, and clinical stage. Arm lymphedema was noted in 12.5% (8 out of 64) of the patients treated with axillary dissection and in 3% (1 out of 33) without axillary dissection. Cosmetic results were satisfactory in 79% of patients after wide excision and radiotherapy and in 71% of patients treated by radiotherapy alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Induction chemotherapy followed by preoperative irradiation may permit the selection of some patients with locally advanced breast cancer for conservative treatment. However, the impact of this treatment modality on long-term survival remains to be established.

Assesssment of the effect of pretreatment with neoadjuvant therapy on primary breast cancer

Patients with invasive cancer of the breast (T1-4, N0-2, M0) were assigned to pretreatment based on oestrogen receptor (ER) status; patients with ER-negative tumours received chemotherapy [mitozantrone, methotrexate and mitomycin C (MMM)] for 3 months, patients with ER-positive tumours underwent endocrine therapy [luteinising hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist goserelin (leuprolide-premenopausal) or 4-hydroxyandrostenedione (formestane-post-menopausal)] for 3 months. Of the first 100 patients assessed at 3 months, 47 with ER-positive tumours had a 40.4% response (premenopausal 53.8%; post-menopausal 35%) and 53 with ER-negative tumours had a 60% response (premenopausal 57%; post-menopausal 63%). Patients with early breast cancer (T1/T2) had a complete clinical resolution in 41% (16/39) of cases after MMM and in 20% (7/35) of cases following endocrine therapy compared with 14% (2/14) advanced tumours (T3/T4) following MMM and (0/12) following endocrine therapy. However, in those patients achieving a complete clinical response, subsequent appropriate surgery showed that 16 of 19 patients (84%) had evidence of residual viable tumour on histological examination.

Locally advanced non-metastatic breast cancer: analysis of prognostic factors in 125 patients homogeneously treated with a combined modality approach

125 stage III breast cancer patients, including 51 cases of inflammatory carcinoma, were treated with the following combined modality approach: three courses of primary 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide (FAC) chemotherapy followed by locoregional treatment and subsequent adjuvant chemotherapy consisting of three courses of FAC alternating with three courses of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil (CMF). Clinical response to primary FAC was 65% (complete 10%). Residual tumour mass in the mastectomy specimen was > 1 and < or = 1 cm in 82 and 18% of cases, respectively. Complete pathological response following primary chemotherapy was achieved in only 3.5% of cases. After primary FAC and local treatment, 97% of patients were disease-free. Overall survival (S) and progression-free survival (PFS) at 5 years were 56 and 34%, respectively. Univariate analysis showed that age, receptor status and clinical and pathological response to primary chemotherapy did not appear to influence treatment outcome significantly, whereas stage, presence of inflammatory disease and number of involved nodes had a significant impact on both S and PFS.

The prognosis of stage III breast cancer treated with postoperative radiotherapy and adriamycin-based chemotherapy with and without tamoxifen. Eight year follow-up results of a randomized trial

Sixty-one patients with primary node positive stage III breast cancers were randomized to receive postoperative radiotherapy and doxorubicin-based chemotherapy (eight cycles of CAFt: cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, oral ftorafur) with or without tamoxifen as adjuvant treatment. The five-year overall survival for all patients was 49% (with tamoxifen 48% and without tamoxifen 50%) and disease-free survival 33% (with tamoxifen 27% and without 39%). Local control for all patients was only 64% despite the postoperative radiotherapy. There was no significant difference between these two treatment groups in overall and disease-free survival or local control. The prognosis of stage III breast cancer remains grim despite modern adjuvant therapy. In addition to more effective systemic treatment more effective local therapy is also needed in order to obtain satisfactory local control. The most important studies in stage III breast cancer with 5-year survival results are reviewed here.

Primary chemotherapy for early and advanced breast cancer

While locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) represents a small fraction of patients with breast cancer in industrialized nations, in developing countries it might constitute up to 50% of incident cases. The definition includes patients with stage IIB, III, and some with limited stage IV breast cancer. Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is part of LABC, but it is often reported separately, because of its dismal prognosis. LABC can be considered technically operable (stage II and IIIA), or inoperable (stage IIIB, IV and IBC). For the last two decades, patients with inoperable LABC and IBC have been treated with increasing frequency with systemic therapy first, followed by regional therapy, either surgical resection or radiotherapy. Most treatment programs also included adjuvant systemic therapy. The majority of patients with LABC and IBC respond to primary chemotherapy, and most can be rendered disease-free initially. Local control rates exceed 80% with modern combined-modality treatment strategies. Since most tumors are downstaged, some patients can be treated with breast-conserving treatments. The optimal sequence of local and systemic treatments has not been defined. Combined-modality therapies improve the treatment and the outcome for patients with LABC. Whether the sequence of utilization of various treatments influences outcome remains to be established. The administration of systemic therapies first also provides a useful biological model to assess the effects of systemic treatments on the primary tumor and regional metastases, since these are available for serial non-invasive evaluation and sampling of tumor tissue.

Management of locally advanced carcinoma of the breast. I. Noninflammatory

BACKGROUND

The treatment of patients with locally advanced noninflammatory breast cancer has evolved substantially over the past 30 years. From 1968 to 1989, 281 women were treated at Mallinckrodt Radiation Oncology Center with four different treatment methods. Median follow-up was 6.2 years (range 3-22 years); no patient was lost to follow-up.

METHODS

Retrospective review of records and analysis of data on a computer file were carried out. Thirty-five patients were treated with irradiation alone, 33 with irradiation and adjuvant chemotherapy, 81 with mastectomy and irradiation, and 132 with mastectomy, irradiation, and chemotherapy (triple-modality).

RESULTS

Actuarial 5- and 10-year disease free survival (DFS) rates were 45% and 36%, respectively, with triple-modality therapy, 31% and 10% with irradiation and chemotherapy, 32% and 19% with irradiation and mastectomy, and 19% and 11% with irradiation alone. Cause specific survival (CSS) paralleled DFS in the four groups. Locoregional tumor control at 5 years was 91% for irradiation, mastectomy, and chemotherapy, 80% for irradiation and mastectomy, 54% for irradiation and chemotherapy, and 31% for irradiation alone. Systemic therapy and/or irradiation given before mastectomy yielded better locoregional tumor control, DFS, and CSS (not statistically significant). No difference in results was noted with radical, modified radical, or total mastectomy. In the triple-modality group, no chest wall failures occurred with chest wall doses greater than 5040 cGy. Grade 2 or higher treatment sequelae were noted in 10-42% of patients, depending on treatment modality.

CONCLUSIONS

Triple-modality therapy yielded improved locoregional tumor control, DFS, and CSS compared with other modalities. Patients treated with surgery had better locoregional tumor control than those who received irradiation alone or in combination with chemotherapy, but the impact on DFS and CSS was less impressive. Additional clinical trials are needed to define further the role and optimal use of the various therapeutic modalities in the management of locally advanced breast cancer.

Locally advanced breast cancer: defining an optimum treatment regimen

PURPOSE

This retrospective review examines response, local control and freedom from distant failure for patients with locally advanced breast cancer treated by chemotherapy and radiotherapy without routine surgery.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

67 patients were treated between January 1980 and December 1988 at Westmead Hospital, NSW, Australia. Median follow-up for surviving patients was 56 months. Four successive protocols evolved, each with three phases induction chemotherapy (adriamycin or novantrone, cyclophosphamide) (three cycles), radiotherapy then chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil) of progressively shorter duration. Radiotherapy and chemotherapy were concurrent in the fourth regimen.

RESULTS

Clinical complete response (disappearance of all known disease) after chemotherapy, radiotherapy and additional chemotherapy was 18%, 55% and 79% respectively. Seven additional patients subsequently underwent mastectomy (N = 2), local excision (N = 1) or a radiation boost (N = 4) for a total complete response rate of 90%. Twenty one patients (31%) failed to achieve a complete response (N = 7) or recurred locally (N = 14). The crude 2-year rate of local recurrence was 50% for tumors > 10 cm (N = 10) and 14% for smaller tumors (n = 57) and was not influenced by protocol. Two-year actuarial freedom from distant failure was 67% at 2 years.

CONCLUSION

Local control can be achieved for patients with locally advanced breast cancer with a primary tumor < 10 cm using chemotherapy and radiotherapy without routine mastectomy.

Prognostic factors in inflammatory breast cancer and therapeutic implications

223 inflammatory breast cancer patients were diagnosed at the Institut Curie between 1977 and 1987. Patients received chemotherapy and radiation treatment according to three consecutive randomised trials. Five- and 10- year survival rates were 41 and 32%, respectively. Disease-free interval rates were 25.5% at 5 years and 19% at 10 years. Parameters significantly linked with a pejorative prognosis in a multivariate analysis were: diffuse erythema, lymph node involvement, chest wall adherence, and age above 50 years. When therapeutic response parameters were included in the multivariate analysis, the five most important prognostic factors in order of significance were complete tumour regression after completion of induction treatment (at 8 months), complete regression of inflammatory symptoms after 3 months of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, limited erythema at presentation and, less significantly, complete regression of inflammatory symptoms at 8 months and tumour regression at 3 months. In conclusion, patients who achieved a rapid and complete remission had a better prognosis than patients who had an incomplete response to chemotherapy. High-dose chemotherapy and reversal or prevention of drug resistance will be evaluated in future trials. Detailed information on the biology of this disease should allow the design of new strategies aiming to improve patient management.

Management of locally advanced breast cancer

The management of locally advanced breast cancer with single modality therapy has been associated with a high rate of systemic failure. A multimodality treatment strategy that includes induction cytotoxic chemotherapy, surgery, radiation therapy, and, possibly, hormonal ablation therapy is the current preferred management approach. As our knowledge and understanding of the mechanisms involved in mitogenic signal transduction improve, it is likely that less toxic, more efficacious agents will emerge.

Sixteen week dose intense chemotherapy for inoperable, locally advanced breast cancer

Up to 15% of women with breast cancer have locally advanced disease at diagnosis. The poor response of these patients to local therapy alone and the frequent development of disseminated disease suggest that early intensive systemic therapy may benefit these women. Twenty-four patients with non-metastatic, locally advanced, primarily inflammatory, inoperable breast cancer were treated with a 16-week dose-intense chemotherapy regimen as induction therapy. Treatment consisted of 8 repetitive 2-week cycles consisting of 100 mg/m2 cyclophosphamide orally D1-7, 40 mg/m2 doxorubicin intravenously (IV) D1, 1 mg vincristine IV D1, 100 mg/m2 methotrexate IV D1, 10 mg/m2 leucovorin every 6 hours for six oral doses D2-3, and 600 mg/m2 5-FU IV over 2 hours D2. A continuous infusion of 300 mg/m2 5-FU per day was given IV D8-9 of each 2-week cycle. After induction all patients had at least a partial clinical response and were operable; 9/24 (37%) achieved a clinical complete response. All patients underwent at least a simple mastectomy. Pathologic examination revealed no evidence of gross macroscopic tumor in 11/24 patients (46%) and no evidence of microscopic disease in 4/24 patients (17%). Seven of 24 patients (29%) had no microscopic disease in the breast. At a median follow-up of 45 months, there have been 10 relapses in the 24 patients treated with this induction regimen. The actuarial relapse-free survival at 5 years is 58%. Actuarial overall survival at 5 years is 75%. We conclude that this regimen is safe and well-tolerated and that the results of this therapy are sufficiently promising to warrant further study of this regimen in patients with locally advanced breast cancer.

Stage III breast cancer: is neoadjuvant chemotherapy always necessary?

Optimal management of locally advanced breast cancer is controversial. Claims of superiority for neoadjuvant systemic therapy are based on comparisons with outdated historical control groups who received no chemotherapy. Between 1978 and 1987, 118 patients with locally advanced breast cancer underwent treatment and follow-up at the Medical College of Virginia. Median follow-up was 44 months (range 3-119 months). Actuarial 5-year survival for the entire group was 54%. This compares favorably with recent series using neoadjuvant chemotherapy in which 5-year survival rates of 40-65% have been reported. Primary tumor size larger than 9 cm, metastases to more than 50% of regional lymph nodes, and the presence of inflammatory disease were significant prognostic indicators. This series represents a contemporary control group of patients with locally advanced breast cancer in whom conventionally accepted guidelines for local and postoperative systemic adjuvant therapy were used. Until the optimal sequence of therapy is determined by prospective randomized trials, series such as this may serve as more appropriate controls to which the results of new therapies could be compared.

Systemic treatment for locally advanced breast cancer: what we still need to learn after a decade of multimodality clinical trials

Multimodality therapy of locally advanced breast cancer with initial chemo-(hormono)-therapy followed by locoregional treatment has become increasingly popular during the past decade. A paucity of large randomised clinical trials leaves the following unanswered questions: does systemic treatment impact on long-term control of distant metastases? What is the best treatment sequence? The most effective drug combination? The optimum treatment duration? Future prospects in the treatment of locally advanced breast cancer include the use of haematopoietic growth factors to increase the dose-intensity of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the investigation of autologous bone marrow transplantation with high dose chemotherapy on a larger scale, the development of new approaches designed at interrupting the "autocrine loop" of breast cancer local growth factors and the introduction of diphosphonates in the adjuvant systemic therapy.

The effect of systemic therapy on local-regional control in locally advanced breast cancer

One hundred and seven patients with locally advanced breast cancer were prospectively referred for multimodality treatment on protocol using chemohormonal therapy to maximal response followed by local treatment and maintenance therapy. Forty-eight patients (45%) were diagnosed with Stage IIIA disease, 46 (43%) with Stage IIIB inflammatory cancer, and 13 (12%) with Stage IIIB non-inflammatory disease. Induction therapy consisted of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil with hormonal synchronization using tamoxifen and conjugated estrogens. Local treatment was determined by response to chemotherapy. Patients with a clinical parital response underwent mastectomy followed by local-regional radiotherapy while patients with a clinical complete response were biopsied for pathologic correlation. Those with residual disease received mastectomy followed by radiotherapy while those with a pathologic complete response received radiation only to the intact breast and regional nodes. With a median follow-up of 64 months, patients with IIIA disease had a significantly lower local-regional failure rate compared to IIIB inflammatory patients, with the 5-year actuarial local-regional failure rate as only site of first failure 3% for IIIA disease versus 21% for IIIB inflammatory cancer (p = .02), and local-regional failure as any component of first failure 12% versus 36% (p = .01), respectively. When local-regional failure was analyzed by repeat biopsy, 5/31 (16%) patients with a pathologic complete response treated with radiation only developed a local-regional failure versus 2/53 (4%) with residual disease treated with mastectomy and postoperative radiotherapy. The 5-year actuarial local-regional failure rate as first site of failure was 23% for radiation only versus 5% for mastectomy and post-operative radiotherapy (p = .07). The response to chemotherapy did not reliably predict local-regional control. Both relapse-free survival and overall survival were significantly better for IIIA versus IIIB patients; stratification by repeat biopsy did not however, significantly affect either relapse-free or overall survival.

Locally advanced (noninflammatory) carcinoma of the breast: results and comparison of various treatment modalities

From 1968-1987 237 women with Stage III, noninflammatory breast cancer were treated with various modalities. Ninety-three (39%) had Stage IIIA tumors, and 144 (61%) had Stage IIIB, noninflammatory tumors (AJC, 1983 staging). Median follow-up was 5.4 years (range 2 to 22 years). No patients were lost to follow-up. Thirty-five patients (15%) were treated with irradiation alone, 27 (11%) with irradiation and adjuvant systemic therapy, 80 (34%) with mastectomy and irradiation, and 95 (40%) with combined mastectomy, irradiation, and systemic therapy. Local/regional control by treatment at 5 and 10 years, respectively, was 31% and 31% for irradiation alone, 47% and 47% for irradiation and systemic therapy, 80% and 80% for irradiation and mastectomy, and 93% and 78% for irradiation, mastectomy, and systemic therapy (p less than .0001). Actuarial disease-free survival by treatment was 19% and 12% for irradiation alone, 25% and 18% for irradiation and systemic therapy, 34% and 20% for irradiation and mastectomy, and 41% and 31% for irradiation, mastectomy, and systemic therapy, at 5 and 10 years, respectively (p = .0001). Patients given systemic therapy and/or irradiation prior to mastectomy had a better local/regional control and DFS and actuarial survival, although not achieving statistical significance (p = 0.10). Of the triple modality group of patients, there were no chest wall failures with chest wall doses greater than 5040 cGy (p = 0.3). There were 40/237 (17%) grade 2 or greater treatment sequelae. The administration of chemotherapy significantly increased complications.

Recent advances in the treatment of breast cancer

Multidisciplinary efforts have defined a number of prognostic factors and newer strategies to improve the outcome of patients with breast cancer. Conservative surgery has led to improved functional and cosmetic results. The development of a number of effective adjuvant regimens has led to improved survival. In patients with stage I disease, several biological characteristics of tumor have been identified that are associated with increased risk of relapse. A multimodality approach to patients with locally advanced disease and inflammatory cancer has resulted in improved survival. A number of hormonal and cytotoxic drug contaminations can palliate metastatic disease, with a small fraction of patients remaining in extended remission. Dose-intensive programs may lead to further improvements in survival of selected patients with this disease.

Randomised trial of chemotherapy versus endocrine therapy in patients presenting with locally advanced breast cancer (a pilot study)

Sixty patients with locally advanced breast cancer, but with no evidence of distant metastases were randomised to receive primary endocrine therapy or chemotherapy after assessment and 'Trucut' biopsy of the primary tumour. After 12 weeks all patients were assessed. Eight out of 30 (27%) of the patients who received chemotherapy showed complete clinical regression of the primary cancer, eight patients' tumours had regressed by more than 50%, and ten showed a 25-50% reduction in bi-dimensional diameter. Only four (13%) patients' tumours failed to reduce in size. Seven patients were judged to require mastectomy at the end of the 12 week period of treatment with chemotherapy. In contrast, only three out of 30 (10%) patients receiving endocrine therapy showed a greater than 50% reduction in tumour size, and four patients had a 25-50% reduction at 12 weeks. The remaining patients' tumours either stabilised (12 patients) or enlarged (11 patients). We conclude that primary chemotherapy in patients with primary breast cancer is more effective in rapidly reducing the size of the primary breast cancer than endocrine therapy (P = 0.001) and alters significantly the future management of these patients. However, at 65 weeks on completion of the follow-up, there is no significant difference in the number of patients' disease-free, locally or distant recurrent, or dead.

Concomitant adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy for high risk breast cancer patients

Thirty four patients treated with mastectomy and axillary node dissection for potentially curable breast cancer received a seven month combined adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy program. These patients were considered to be at high risk for recurrence because they had either three or more positive axillary lymph nodes or their primary tumor was greater than 5 cm in diameter. The chemotherapy given at 3-week intervals consisted of cyclophosphamide, 600 mg/m2, Adriamycin 40 mg/m2, and methotrexate 40 mg/m2 during cycles 1 through 3 and 7 through 9. Radiation therapy was administered during cycles 4 through 6 with concomitant administration of 5-fluorouracil 600 mg/m2, vincristine 1.4 mg/m2, and prednisone 40 mg/m2 for 7 days. Median follow up time from initiation of study is 60 months (range 36-93). Seventeen of 34 patients (50%) remain free of recurrent breast cancer. Distant metastases and local-regional recurrence have occurred in 16 (47%) and 4 (12%) patients, respectively. Significant myelosuppression and infections requiring hospitalization were seen in 4 patients, with 1 treatment-related death. Adriamycin-containing chemotherapy and post-operative radiotherapy can thus be combined in an adjuvant treatment program with acceptable toxicity.

Multimodal therapy in locally advanced breast carcinoma

Among 879 patients treated for breast cancer between 1975 and 1984, advanced disease was found in 125 (14%). A subgroup of 34 (4%) presented with untreated locally advanced disease without demonstrable distant metastases at the time of diagnosis (stage IIIB = T4abed, NX-2,MO). During the first 5 years (1975 through 1979), 17 patients were treated primarily with sequential radiotherapy and chemotherapy (Group A). From 1980 to 1984 (Group B), the management consisted of four courses of induction multi-drug chemotherapy followed primarily by mastectomy and additional chemotherapy. The mean follow-up for the most recent group (Group B) is 48 months. Follow-up was complete. While the local disease control rate was the same for both groups (76%), the survival was remarkably different. Group A patients experienced a median survival of 15 months, and only one survived 5 years. In Group B, the median survival was 56 months with nine patients (53%) alive between 40 and 76 months, seven (41%) of whom are 5-year survivors. While the overall mortality of patients with inflammatory breast cancer was greater in both groups when compared with the group with noninflammatory disease, the survival of patients in Group B was better than in Group A for both inflammatory and noninflammatory cancers (p less than 0.01). Estrogen receptor, nodal, and menopausal status did not influence survival. These data suggest that neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves survival for patients with stage IIIB breast carcinoma and delays the establishment or progression of distant metastases. Mastectomy is an important component in the treatment of this disease.

Selection of therapy for stage III breast cancer

Locally advanced breast cancer is a heterogenous group including both operable and inoperable lesions. Local surgery or radiation alone produces poor survival rates, indicating micrometastases at diagnosis. Systemic chemotherapy as part of multimodality regimens has increased the length and rate of disease-free survival.

Prognostic factors in locally advanced noninflammatory breast cancer. Long-term results following primary chemotherapy

Since 1973 we have treated T3b-T4 (stage III) breast cancer with various forms of multidisciplinary approaches through prospective trials. The present report analyses the 10-year results of 277 patients. Primary chemotherapy consisted of adriamycin plus vincristine given for three or four cycles prior to high-energy irradiation or surgery. In 205 of 277 (74%) additional chemotherapy was planned following the local-regional modality. Primary chemotherapy yielded complete plus partial remission in 62% (CR 7%). Long-term freedom from progression and overall survival were significantly improved by the addition of chemotherapy following local-regional treatment (radiotherapy or surgery). Further chemotherapy was able to significantly affect treatment outcome when it was analyzed both singly and in the presence of other prognostic variables. Thus, in our experience, the variables significantly affecting the 10-year results were represented by duration of treatment and tumor cell burden expressed by size of primary malignancy and clinical nodal status. Locally advanced breast cancer appears a pleomorphic disease difficult to control over a long period of time because of its frequent presentation with bulky tumor and the very high risk of disseminated micrometastases. Thus, the management of this stage of disease almost invariably requires a multidisciplinary approach.

Primary medical therapy for operable breast cancer

Fifty-seven patients with large but potentially operable primary breast cancer were treated with primary medical therapy rather than initial mastectomy, using chemotherapy (15) or endocrine therapy (42) with the tumour remaining in situ. Of patients treated with chemotherapy, one (7%) achieved a complete remission, and eight (53%) a partial response (overall response rate 60%). Only one patient had progressive disease while on chemotherapy. Of patients who received endocrine therapy, one (2%) achieved a complete response, and 19 (45%) a partial response (overall response rate 47%). Two patients progressed on endocrine therapy. Only 10 patients have so far had a subsequent mastectomy (18%), and 17 (30%) have had radiotherapy and/or conservative surgery. The rest are still on medical therapy. With a median follow-up of 19 months (range 6-42 months) only two patients have had a local recurrence after being disease-free and none have developed uncontrollable local recurrence. Eight (14%) have developed distant metastases and four (7%) have died of metastatic disease. Primary medical therapy may offer an effective alternative to mastectomy for patients with operable breast carcinomas too large for conservative surgery and merits further study.

Arterial thrombosis associated with adjuvant chemotherapy for breast carcinoma: a Cancer and Leukemia Group B Study

PURPOSE

Multiagent chemotherapy and chemohormonal therapy for breast cancer are associated with an increased risk for venous thromboembolic complications. We observed instances of arterial thrombosis in two studies of breast cancer involving multiagent chemotherapy for stages II and III disease. Our purpose in this study was to determine the incidence of this complication and whether it appeared to be related to the chemotherapy or was a random event.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Episodes of arterial thrombotic events were identified from record reviews of 1,014 assessable patients with breast cancer entered on two Cancer and Leukemia Group B protocols. Details of the kind of arterial event, when it occurred, the outcome, and the occurrence of metastases were analyzed.

RESULTS

Thirteen (1.3%) patients had an arterial thrombosis: six (5.3%) of 113 patients with stage III disease and seven (0.8%) of 901 patients with stage II disease. Four of these patients had a peripheral arterial thrombosis and nine had strokes (four were fatal). All these events occurred while the patients were receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. Only one additional arterial event (a stroke approximately four years later) has occurred in this patient group after chemotherapy was completed.

CONCLUSION

Arterial thrombosis is also associated with multiagent chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer. The mechanism is unknown.

Locally advanced breast cancer current status and future directions

Patients described as having locally advanced breast cancer comprise a heterogeneous group of patients with variable clinical presentations. Systematic evaluation of patients with these presentations has been limited, with much of our current understanding based on retrospective reviews. Prospective pilot studies have demonstrated the feasibility of multimodality therapy. However, there have been few well-conducted randomized trials in this setting. Comparison of results among studies is made difficult by the varying eligibility criteria and the way in which the data are reported. The use of common and consistent definitions of operable and inoperable disease is necessary for a more uniform understanding of the therapeutic interventions necessary for a given patient within this broad category of Stage III or locally advanced breast cancer. There are a variety of opportunities for clinical research activities in this group of patients including tests of hormonal recruitment or synchronization, high dose chemotherapy requiring autologous bone marrow transplantation, perioperative or preoperative chemotherapy, and alternating chemotherapy with short course radiotherapy. The integration of clinical information with biological characteristics of the tumor such as cytokinetics, oncogene amplification, and hormone receptors will be an important and necessary focus of future investigation in this disease.