A new technique for endoscopic mucosal resection with an insulated-tip electrosurgical knife improves the completeness of resection of intramucosal gastric neoplasms

Clinical outcomes of EMR for gastric tumors: historical pilot evaluation between endoscopic submucosal dissection and conventional mucosal resection

BACKGROUND

EMR is currently a standard treatment for mucosal gastric tumors. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been developed for en bloc resection.

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the clinical outcomes of ESD compared with conventional EMR.

DESIGN

Not applicable.

SETTING

A historical control study was performed between EMR and ESD.

PATIENTS

EMR of 245 gastric tumors was performed in 229 patients. Lesions were divided into two groups. Conventional EMR was performed in group A from February 1999 to June 2001, and ESD was performed in group B from July 2001 to March 2004. Group B was divided into subgroups: subgroup B-1 underwent ESD from July 2001 to March 2003 and subgroup B-2 from April 2003 to March 2004.

INTERVENTIONS

All lesions were resected with conventional EMR or with ESD.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

En bloc resection rate, rate in completeness of resection, required time, remnant ratio, and complications were evaluated.

RESULTS

With regard to lesions >10 mm in size, the en bloc resection rate and the rate in completeness of resection of group B was significantly higher than that of group A (p < 0.01). Although the required time was longer in group B than A (p < 0.01), it was shorter in subgroup B-2 compared with B-1 (p < 0.05) with lesions < or =10 mm in size. The remnant ratio and perforation rate were not different between groups.

LIMITATIONS

Not applicable.

CONCLUSIONS

The en bloc resection rate was better with ESD than with conventional EMR. The required time was longer in ESD, but this disadvantage might be improved with experience.

Probe EUS for the diagnosis of invasion depth in superficial esophageal cancer: a comparison between a jelly-filled method and a water-filled balloon method

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Diagnostic accuracy of probe EUS depends on the constant maintenance of luminal medium for acoustic coupling. This study compared the accuracy of probe EUS by a jelly-filled method (EUS-J) and by a water-filled balloon method (EUS-W) for the assessment of invasion depth in superficial esophageal cancer.

DESIGN AND SETTING

A prospective, single-center study.

PATIENTS

Forty superficial esophageal cancers in 38 patients.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were alternately assigned to EUS-J or EUS-W. The depth of invasion was classified into epithelium or lamina propria mucosae (D1), muscularis mucosae or superficial layer of the submucosa (D2), and deep portion of the submucosa (D3). Depiction rate, interobserver variation between 2 observers, and accuracy for the determination of invasion depth were compared between EUS-J and EUS-W.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Eighteen cancers were examined by EUS-J, and 22 cancers were examined by EUS-W. The actual depth of invasion was D1 in 21 cancers, D2 in 9 cancers, and D3 in 10 cancers. Depiction rate (94.4% vs 77.2%, P = .14) and interobserver agreement of EUS determination (82.3% vs 58.8%, P = .13) was higher in EUS-J than in EUS-W. The overall accuracy for the diagnosis of invasion depth was 77.8% in EUS-J and 59.1% in EUS-W (P = .18). The sensitivity for the diagnosis of D1 cancer was significantly higher in EUS-J than in EUS-W (100% vs 50%, P = .03), while the specificity was not different between the 2 procedures (81.8% vs 87.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

EUS-J is superior to EUS-W for the assessment of invasion depth in superficial esophageal cancer, especially for intramucosal cancer.

Endoscopic mucosal resection

Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is a promising therapeutic option for removal of superficial carcinomas or premalignant lesions throughout the gastrointestinal tract. This review discusses indications and the several techniques of EMR in early tumors of esophagus, stomach, duodenum, and colon. EMR is not yet widely utilized in the West. However, great benefits may be obtained from this non-invasive technique after an accurate evaluation of patients and a careful staging of lesions that may assess the depth of infiltration and exclude the presence of lymph node metastases. EMR permits a complete removal of the lesion with histologic assessment of the entire specimen and the change in the pathologic stage in a significant number of patients. To minimize the risk of serious complications (mostly bleeding and perforation), only experienced endoscopists should undertake EMR in an appropriate environment. Data from literature are encouraging on the use of EMR, but a long-term follow-up of a large number of patients is necessary to confirm the effectiveness of this therapy.

Endoscopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

The treatment of early gastric cancer (EGC) using an endoscopy, namely, endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), has been adopted for about 20 years, but the effectiveness and the safety of the modality are still controversial. The quality of these trials has not been assessed systematically.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this review was to compare the effectiveness and the safety of EMR with gastrectomy for the treatment of EGC.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Searches were conducted on the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials - CENTRAL (which includes the Cochrane Upper Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic Diseases Group Trials Register) on The Cochrane Library (Issue 1 2005) MEDLINE (1966 to March 2005) and EMBASE (1980 to March 2005), CINAHL (1985-March 2005) and CBM (Chinese BioMedical Database 1982 -2002). Reference lists from trials selected by electronic searching were handsearched to identify further relevant trials. Published abstracts from conference proceedings from the United European Gastroenterology Week (published in Gut) and Digestive Disease Week (published in Gastroenterology) were handsearched. Members of the Cochrane UGPD Group, and experts in the field were contacted and asked to provide details of outstanding clinical trials and any relevant unpublished materials

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials of EGC patients involving a treatment arm of EMR and a comparison arm of gastrectomy were to be included, but no RCTs were found.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three reviewers (YP Wang, C Bennett and T Pan) independently assessed the eligibility of potential trials and extracted the data.

MAIN RESULTS

There are no included randomised control trials for the systematic review. Available evidence derived from non-randomised controlled trials is discussed in the main text of this review.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is a lack of randomised controlled trials in which EMR is compared with gastrectomy for EGC. There is a need for well designed randomised controlled trials to determine the effects of EMR compared to gastrectomy.

The role of endoscopic resection and ablation therapy for early lesions

Endoscopic resection (ER) has gained more and more importance in the treatment of early neoplastic lesions in Barrett's oesophagus over the last few years. The choice of the different available techniques depends on the site, the macroscopic type of the tumour and the personal experience of the endoscopist. The 'suck-and-cut' technique with ligation device or cap should be favoured to normal strip biopsy in the oesophagus because of the size of the resected specimen and its technical feasibility. A recently described method of EMR comprises the circumferential mucosal incision with a special type of needle-knife and subsequent en-bloc resection following prior injection under the lesions, but only a few patients with early Barrett's cancer were treated so far. EMR should be considered as the treatment of choice for high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HGIN) and mucosal adenocarcinoma in Barrett's oesophagus. First mid- and long-term results of endoscopic therapy show promising results, disease-free survival is comparable to oesophagectomy. Studies with larger patient numbers proved the efficacy and safety of ER, major complications occur <1%. Photodynamic therapy and other ablation therapies, although they are comparably effective, have a decisive disadvantage in comparison with ER: they lack the opportunity for histological processing of the resected specimen and therefore, provide no information regarding the depth of invasion of the individual layers of the oesophageal wall, and regarding radicality of the resection. Curative endoscopic treatment of early neoplastic lesions in Barrett's oesophagus should only be carried out in centers with a high-volume.

Endoscopic treatment of high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and early cancer in Barrett oesophagus

In the last 5 years, endoscopic therapy for high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HGIN) and early cancer (EC) in Barrett oesophagus has emerged as an effective and safe alternative to surgery. Adequate work-up of patients includes histopathological review of the initial biopsies, a high-resolution endoscopy with four-quadrant random biopsies every 1cm of Barrett mucosa and staging with endoscopic ultrasonography. Endoscopic resection (ER) forms the mainstay of the endoscopic treatment since it provides large tissue specimens for optimal histopathological evaluation. The ER-cap technique with submucosal injection and the 'suck-band-and cut' method are the resection methods most widely used in Barrett oesophagus patients. ER monotherapy for HGIN or EC in Barrett oesophagus is associated with recurrent lesions in up to 30% of treated patients. ER may be combined with ablative techniques such as photodynamic therapy (PDT) to treat all of the mucosa at risk for neoplastic progression. Unlike ER, PDT lacks histopathological correlation and residual Barrett mucosa may remain after treatment or may be hidden underneath the neosquamous epithelium. Management of Barrett oesophagus patients with HGIN or EC should be performed in centres with multi-disciplinary experience in this field and future studies should focus on development of ER techniques that allow radical resection of the whole Barrett segment.

The learning curve for EMR with circumferential mucosal incision in treating intramucosal gastric neoplasm

BACKGROUND

EMR with circumferential mucosal incision facilitates en bloc resection, which is the most important predictor for complete resection in the treatment of intramucosal gastric neoplasm. The objective of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and the safety of EMR with circumferential mucosal incision in relation to the endoscopist's experience.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we analyzed the outcome of 80 EMR procedures performed by a single endoscopist at the National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea. The EMR procedure with circumferential mucosal incision was performed with a conventional needle knife. We compared the en bloc resection rate, the complete resection rate, the duration of the procedure time, and the associated complications by quartiles.

RESULTS

From the first to the last quartile, en bloc resection rates were 55%, 45%, 85%, and 85% (p = 0.006), and complete resection rates were 65%, 60%, 90%, and 85% (p = 0.039). The increase in the mean en bloc and complete resection rates between the first two quartiles and the second two quartiles was significant (p = 0.002 and p = 0.019, respectively). Three perforations (15%) were reported in the first quartile and only one (1.7%) in the remaining 3 quartiles (p = 0.046). The procedure time also decreased after the first 20 cases (p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

For an experienced endoscopist, EMR with circumferential mucosal incision could be performed effectively and safely after the experience of 40 cases.

Endoluminal gastric surgery: the modern era of minimally invasive surgery

Laparoendoluminal techniques are the next frontier in modern surgery. They provide a minimally invasive approach to gastric diseases that enables organ preservation while maintaining open surgical principles. Laparoscopic direct access to the stomach provides a magnified, high-resolution image for precise excision using widely available laparoscopic instrumentation. Further improvements in flexible endoscopic equipment, combined with the infusion of robotic instrumentation, will aid in overcoming the technical demands of this procedure and fuel the growth of endo-luminal gastric surgery. Based on the currently available data, inappropriately selected patients, endoluminal gastric surgery affords the patients a definitive surgical procedure with all the advantages of a minimally invasive approach.

Treatment of elderly patients with early gastric cancer by endoscopic submucosal dissection using an insulated-tip diathermic knife

OBJECTIVE

In recent years, the number of elderly patients with early gastric cancer (EGC) has steadily been increasing. In our institute, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) involving the use of an insulated-tip diathermic knife (IT-ESD) was introduced for the treatment of mucosal gastric carcinoma in 1996. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of IT-ESD for the treatment of elderly patients with EGC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 144 patients with EGC were treated at Shikoku Cancer Center in the 5-year period from January 2000 to December 2004, including 53 patients over 75 years old. The performance status (PS) for all patients was less than 2. We compared patient's backgrounds, the one-piece resection rate, complete resection (CR) rate, operation time, bleeding rate, perforation rate, blood pressure, and peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO(2)) between patients over 75 years of age (elderly group) and the remaining 91 younger patients (non-elderly group).

RESULTS

The rate of having underlying disease was significantly higher for the elderly group (p<0.05) and we found no significant difference for the one-piece resection rate, CR rate, operation time, bleeding rate, and perforation rate between the 2 groups. There were also no significant differences for the frequency of the use of oxygen, pressor and depressor between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

There was no significant difference in the outcome resulting from ESD between the 2 groups. Our study proves that ESD is a feasible treatment for elderly patients with EGC PS of less than 2.

Laparoscopic lymph node dissection after endoscopic submucosal dissection: a novel and minimally invasive approach to treating early-stage gastric cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), a newly developed endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) technique, can completely cure a differentiated mucosal gastric cancer smaller than 2 cm. For early-stage gastric cancers (EGCs) deviating from the above-mentioned criterion, gastrectomy with lymph node dissection is performed for potential risk of lymph node metastasis (LNM). However, many of surgical EGC cases actually do not have LNM, indicating this surgery may not be necessary for many cases of EGC. To avoid this unnecessary surgery, we have introduced laparoscopic lymph node dissection (LLND) after ESD. Standard gastrectomy with extended lymph node dissection is indicated for patients if LLND reveals LNM. We present our novel approach and the preliminary results of EGC patients having potential risk of LNM.

METHODS

Five patients with EGC deviating from the EMR criterion underwent the combination of ESD and LLND. ESD was performed using a newly developed insulation-tipped diathermic knife. Lymph nodes, which were determined on the basis of the location of the primary tumor and lymphatic drainage of the stomach, were removed laparoscopically. The lymphatic drainage was visualized by submucosally injecting indocyanine green (ICG) around the post-ESD ulcerative scars during intraoperative gastroscopy.

RESULTS

The ESD enabled en bloc resection without any complications. The resected margins of all the lesions were free of cancer cells vertically and horizontally. LLND was successfully performed without any complications. The mean number of the dissected lymph nodes was 15 (range 6 to 22). In 4 of the 5 patients, the dissected lymph nodes were free of cancer cells, and therefore, the combination of ESD and LLND was considered a definitive treatment. The remaining patient was found to have LNM but chose not to undergo any surgery. During follow-ups, the patients' previous quality of life was restored without any tumor recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of ESD and LLND enables the complete resection of the primary tumor and the histologic determination of lymph node status. This combination treatment is a potential, minimally invasive method, and may obviate unnecessary gastrectomy without compromising curability for EGC patients having the potential risk of LNM.

Endoscopic mucosal resection: treatment of neoplasia

Techniques of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) can dramatically improve the ability to diagnose and treat superficial lesions in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Early cancers, submucosal tumors, and sessile polyps can be safely and completely removed in a single procedure, with long-term outcome results comparable to surgery. This is accomplished with a minimum cost, morbidity, and mortality and with little or no impact on the quality of life of patients. This article provides an overview of the techniques, indications, and outcomes of EMR in the management of GI malignancy.

Endoscopic full-thickness resection with sutured closure in a porcine model

BACKGROUND

Some early gastric cancers might be advantageously staged and treated by full-thickness resection if secure methods for closing the defect were available. The aim of this study was to test the feasibility of full-thickness gastric resection.

METHODS

Full-thickness gastric resections were performed by using a ligating device without submucosal injection in survival studies in pigs (n = 8). The defects were closed by using new methods for suturing, locking, and cutting thread through a 2.8-mm accessory channel. Stitches (n = 2-4) were placed close to the target area before resection.

OBSERVATIONS

Full-thickness resections (n = 8) were performed. The pigs survived without incident for 21 to 28 days. Healing of the suture site was evident at follow-up endoscopy. Suture sites were water tight. The pull-out force with stitches by using this new sewing method was significantly higher than with endoscopic clips (20.3 N +/- 0.94 vs. 2.2 N +/- 0.42, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic full-thickness resection with sutured defect closure was feasible and appeared safe in these survival experiments.

Endoscopic treatment of high-grade dysplasia and early stage cancer in Barrett's esophagus

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate endoscopic resection (ER) combined with photodynamic therapy (PDT) for the treatment of selected patients with early neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus.

METHODS

Patients with Barrett's esophagus and neoplastic lesions <2 cm in diameter and no sign of submucosal infiltration, positive lymph nodes, or distant metastasis underwent diagnostic ER (cap technique). Patients with a T1sm tumor in the resection specimen were referred for surgery; those with a T1m or a less invasive tumor underwent additional endoscopic therapy (ER, PDT, and/or argon plasma coagulation [APC]), or they were followed. PDT was performed with 5-aminolevulinic acid and a light dose of 100 J/cm 2 at lambda = 632 nm.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients underwent diagnostic ER. Endoscopic treatment was not performed in 5 patients, who underwent surgery (4 T1sm; 1, patient preference). Five patients were immediately entered into a follow-up protocol, and 23 received additional endoscopic treatment (13 additional ER, 19 PDT, 3 APC). Endoscopic treatment was successful in 26/28 patients; no severe complication was observed. During follow-up (median 19 months, range 13-24 months), 5/26 patients had a recurrence of high-grade dysplasia: all were successfully re-treated with ER. At the end of follow-up, 26/33 originally enrolled patients (79%) and 26/28 endoscopically treated patients (93%) were in local remission.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic therapy is safe and effective for selected patients with early stage neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus.

Novel endoscopic therapies for gastrointestinal malignancies: endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic ablation

Gastrointestinal malignancies are often detected at advanced stages when the prognosis is poor. Screening guidelines that vary accord-ing to the regional disease prevalence are needed. High-resolution endoscopy, magnification endoscopy, chromoendoscopy, light autofluorescence endoscopy, and optical coherence tomography are new technologies designed to improve endoscopic detection. Once detected, lesions must be accurately staged, including depth of mucosal penetration and lymph node involvement, to determine endoscopic resectability. Widely applicable, relatively safe, and minimally invasive alternatives to surgery are needed. Endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic ablation are potentially curative for malignancies limited to the mucosa, obviating the need for surgery in these patients.

Efficacy of clinical pathway for the management of mucosal gastric carcinoma treated with endoscopic submucosal dissection using an insulated-tip diathermic knife

OBJECTIVE

Recently, the cases of early gastric carcinomas which can be treated by endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) method have been increasing in our institute. Simple and precise guidelines for treating mucosal gastric carcinoma are necessary for improving the treatment outcome of this disease. In our institute, ESD using an insulated-tip diathermic knife (IT-ESD) was introduced for the treatment of mucosal gastric carcinoma in 1996. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of a clinical pathway and standardize the treatment for mucosal gastric carcinoma treated with IT-ESD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Clinical Pathway and standardized of treatment for mucosal gastric carcinoma treated with IT-ESD were introduced at our institute in January 2002. We compared the length of hospitalization, total costs, hospital costs, operation time and bleeding rate during the 18 months before and after January 2002.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the clinical characteristics of the 20 patients in the control group and the 23 patients in the pathway group. There were 9 and 13 bleeding cases in the respective groups. The mean length of hospitalization, total costs and hospital costs were significantly less for patients in the pathway group. There was no significant difference in the operation time or bleeding rate among the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Our clinical pathway and the standardization of treatment for mucosal gastric carcinoma treated with IT-ESD proved effective for treating patients with mucosal gastric carcinoma and for minimizing the length of hospitalization without compromising patient care.

Endoscopic treatment or surgery for undifferentiated early gastric cancer?

BACKGROUND

Although almost all (96%) the surgical cases of undifferentiated intramucosal early gastric cancer (EGC) have been found not to have lymph node metastasis (LNM), local treatment by endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is not accepted as an alternative treatment to surgery for this type of EGC. If a subgroup of patients with undifferentiated EGC with negligible risk of LNM can be defined, unnecessary surgery can be avoided. This study was conducted to determine this subgroup among undifferentiated EGC patients in whom the risk of LNM can be highly ruled out in an attempt to identify candidates who can be treated by EMR.

METHODS

Data from 175 patients surgically resected for undifferentiated EGC were retrospectively collected, and clinicopathological factors were multivariately analyzed to identify predictive factors for LNM.

RESULTS

Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified two independent risk factors for LNM, namely, a large tumor (>/=20 mm, P = 0.011) and presence of lymphatic involvement (P = 0.0005). Using these two risk factors as the predictive factors, LNM was observed in 5.8% of patients who had neither of the two predictive factors, whereas 23.1% or 13.1% of patients with one or two predictive factors had LNM, respectively. In contrast, the LNM rate was calculated to be 60% in patients who had both factors. Lymph node metastasis was not found in any of 6 patients with small intramucosal lesions (<10 mm) without lymphatic involvement.

CONCLUSIONS

An intramucosal undifferentiated EGC that is smaller than 10 mm without lymphatic involvement can safely be treated by EMR alone, given the negligible possibility of LNM. When histological examination of endoscopically resected specimens shows lymphatic involvement or unexpectedly larger tumor size than that determined at pre-EMR endoscopic diagnosis, an additional surgical procedure should be considered.

Predictive factors for lymph node metastasis of differentiated submucosally invasive gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

For early gastric cancer, submucosal invasion may be unrecognized until histopathologic examination of the specimen obtained by EMR. Gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy is the standard treatment for such submucosal cancers. However, approximately 80% of submucosal cancers do not have lymph node metastasis. Unnecessary surgery could be avoided if a subgroup of patients with submucosal cancer with negligible risk of lymph node metastasis can be defined. This study was conducted to define such a subgroup.

METHODS

Data from 104 patients surgically treated for differentiated submucosal cancers were retrospectively collected. A multivariate analysis of clinicopathologic factors was performed to identify predictive factors for lymph node metastasis.

RESULTS

Three independent risk factors, namely, female gender (p=0.0174), deep invasion (> or =500 microm) into the submucosal layer (p=0.001), and presence of lymphatic involvement (p < 0.0001) were associated with lymph node metastasis. Lymph node metastasis was not observed in any patient who had limited submucosal invasion and absence of lymphatic involvement. The rate of lymph node metastasis was calculated to be 80% in patients who had both deep submucosal invasion and lymphatic involvement.

CONCLUSIONS

If endoscopic resection specimens exhibit no deep penetration (<500 microm) into the submucosal layer and lymphatic involvement is absent, EMR may be sufficient treatment for submucosal well-differentiated early gastric cancers. A long-term follow-up study of patients with such lesions treated by EMR alone is required.

Combined use of a magnifying endoscope with a narrow band imaging system and a multibending endoscope for en bloc EMR of early stage gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

En bloc EMR is performed in Japan as a curative treatment for early stage gastric cancer. However, current methods of EMR are technically difficult and require proficiency in determining the extent of the cancer. This study assessed the feasibility of a new method to obviate these problems and to facilitate en bloc EMR.

METHODS

The new method uses two types of endoscopes: a magnifying endoscope with a narrow band imaging system to enhance the definition of mucosal and microcirculatory structure, and an endoscope with multibending tip deflection to maintain orientation during EMR. Forty-two consecutive cases of mucosal gastric cancer treated by EMR were reviewed retrospectively. In 12 of these patients, 12 lesions that fulfilled guideline criteria for EMR were treated by the modified, en bloc EMR method of circumferential incision and snare resection by using the two endoscopes.

RESULTS

The rate of complete en bloc resection with the new method of EMR was 91.7%, (11/12). There was no major complication.

CONCLUSIONS

The new en bloc resection method for EMR with two endoscopes described here is feasible and may be a safe and a reliable technique for curative treatment of mucosal gastric cancer.

A new method of EMR: submucosal injection of a fibrinogen mixture

BACKGROUND

The technical limitation associated with submucosal injection of normal saline solution during EMR is the relatively short duration of mucosal elevation. The clinical application of a new method of EMR with submucosal injection of a fibrinogen mixture was evaluated.

METHODS

Thirty-five early stage neoplastic gastric lesions were resected by EMR with submucosal injection of a fibrinogen mixture. The efficacy and clinical outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

Additional submucosal injection was not required for any of the 35 lesions to complete the EMR with submucosal injection of a fibrinogen mixture procedure. The rates of en bloc resection and complete resection were, respectively, 82.9% and 88.6%. The en bloc resection rate was significantly lower for lesions over 20 mm in diameter (60% vs. 92%; p<0.05) and for lesions on the lesser curvature or posterior wall of the stomach compared with those on the greater curvature or anterior wall (55.6% vs. 92.3%; p<0.05). The rate of complete resection also was dependent on the size and location of the lesions. There was no major EMR with submucosal injection of a fibrinogen mixture related complication including bleeding or perforation.

CONCLUSIONS

EMR with submucosal injection of a fibrinogen mixture is an easy, safe, and technically efficient method for complete EMR.

Management of pre-malignant and malignant lesions by endoscopic resection

Endoscopic resection (ER) has gained more and more importance in the treatment of early gastrointestinal neoplasia over the last few years. The choice of the different available techniques depends on the site, the macroscopic type of the tumour and the personal experience of the endoscopist. The 'suck-and-cut' technique with ligation device or cap should be favoured to normal strip biopsy in the oesophagus because of the size of the resected specimen and its technical feasibility. A recently described method of ER in the stomach is the circumferential mucosal incision with a type of needle-knife and subsequent en-bloc resection following prior injection under the lesions. ER of high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and mucosal adenocarcinoma in Barrett's oesophagus should be considered as the treatment of choice. First mid-term results of endoscopic therapy of early squamous-cell neoplasia in the oesophagus show promising results; however, long-term results are awaited. Studies with large numbers of patients in Japan proved the efficiency and safety of ER in low-risk early gastric carcinoma. Duodenal lesions and adenomas of the major duodenal papilla were also proved to be treated successfully by ER. In the colon, ER is used successfully for resection of adenomas and small well-differentiated or moderately differentiated carcinomas that are restricted to the mucosa. ER of gastrointestinal lesions is a safe and effective method but should be performed only by experienced endoscopists.

Laparoscopic gastric surgery in a Japanese institution: analysis of the initial 100 procedures

BACKGROUND

Although endoscopic surgical procedures are popular in various fields, reports on its use in gastric surgical procedures are limited. This study was designed to review our initial experience with laparoscopic gastric surgical techniques to evaluate indications and surgical results.

STUDY DESIGN

We undertook a retrospective analysis of 100 patients (66 men and 34 women, mean age 63 years) who underwent laparoscopic gastric surgical procedures between 1995 and 2001. Procedures performed were distal gastrectomy (n = 76), wedge resection (n = 20), and intragastric surgical procedures (n = 4). Patients were divided into two groups according to the date of the procedure, from the earliest to the most recent.

RESULTS

There were 85 patients with gastric cancers, 14 submucosal tumors, and 1 duodenal ulcer. In 8 cases conversion was made to an open surgical procedure. Operation times required for distal gastrectomy, wedge resection, and intragastric surgical procedures were 330 +/- 69, 144 +/- 34, and 298 +/- 106 min, and blood loss was 354 +/- 251, 56 +/- 94, and 33 +/- 58 g, respectively. Complications included transient anastomotic stenosis (n = 5), leakage (n = 4), and bleeding (n = 1) after distal gastrectomy, and bleeding (n = 1) after intragastric surgical procedures. There were no complications after wedge resection. Comparing the first and second halves of the series, the percentage of distal gastrectomy significantly increased from 66% to 86% (p = 0.02) and the number of dissected lymph nodes at this procedure increased from 20 +/- 13 to 33 +/- 17 (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic gastric surgical procedures are safe and feasible for early gastric cancers and submucosal tumors. Technical advances in lymph node dissection have made distal gastrectomy a leading and increasingly popular laparoscopic procedure for early gastric cancer.

Laparoscopic intragastric surgery for gastric tube cancer following esophagectomy

As a result of the recent improvement of the prognosis of esophageal cancer, the reporting frequency of gastric tube cancer following esophageal cancer has increased. Gastric tube total resection following median sternotomy, a highly invasive surgical procedure, is applied to the cases of advanced gastric tube cancer, whereas endoscopic mucosal resection is selected for the cases of early gastric tube cancer. If endoscopic mucosal resection is not applicable for some reason, partial or total resection of the gastric tube following median sternotomy has been selected. We applied laparoscopic intragastric surgery to such a case: The patient, a 59-year-old man with esophageal cancer, had undergone subtotal esophagectomy followed by gastric tube reconstruction through the retrosternal route 6 years before. Since endoscopy revealed early gastric cancer in the body of the stomach, we tried to perform mucosal resection but failed because of anastomotic stenosis. However, we successfully performed intragastric surgery, in which a camera and forceps were inserted directly into the gastric tube. Thus, laparoscopic intragastric surgery is a useful technique in cases to which endoscopic mucosal resection is not applicable.

Circumferential EMR and complete removal of Barrett's epithelium: a new approach to management of Barrett's esophagus containing high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and intramucosal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

There is no study of circumferential EMR in patients with Barrett's esophagus containing early stage malignant lesions. This study investigated the effectiveness and safety of circumferential EMR by using a simple snare technique without cap.

METHOD

Patients with Barrett's esophagus containing multifocal high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia or intramucosal cancer, and patients with endoscopically nonidentifiable early stage malignant mucosal changes incidentally detected in random biopsy specimens were included in the study. A 30 x 50-mm polypectomy snare made of monofilament 0.4-mm steel wire was used without any additional device or submucosal injection.

RESULTS

Twelve patients (10 men, 2 women; median age 63.5 years, range 43-88 years) underwent circumferential EMR; 5 had multifocal lesions, and 7 had no visible lesions. Segments of Barrett's epithelium were circumferential (median length 5 cm) and completely removed. The median number of EMR sessions was 2.5. The median number of snare resections per EMR session was 5. The medial total area of mucosa in resected specimens per session was 3.8 cm(2). Two patients developed strictures that were successfully treated by bougienage. Minor bleeding occurred during 4 of 31 EMR sessions. During a median follow-up of 9 months, no recurrence of Barrett's esophagus or malignancy was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Circumferential EMR with a simple snare technique is feasible, safe, and effective for complete removal of Barrett's epithelium with early stage malignant changes.