Afatinib versus gefitinib in patients with EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: overall survival data from the phase IIb LUX-Lung 7 trial

Predicting cancer drug TARGETS - TreAtment Response Generalized Elastic-neT Signatures

We are now in an era of molecular medicine, where specific DNA alterations can be used to identify patients who will respond to specific drugs. However, there are only a handful of clinically used predictive biomarkers in oncology. Herein, we describe an approach utilizing in vitro DNA and RNA sequencing and drug response data to create TreAtment Response Generalized Elastic-neT Signatures (TARGETS). We trained TARGETS drug response models using Elastic-Net regression in the publicly available Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC) database. Models were then validated on additional in-vitro data from the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE), and on clinical samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Stand Up to Cancer/Prostate Cancer Foundation West Coast Prostate Cancer Dream Team (WCDT). First, we demonstrated that all TARGETS models successfully predicted treatment response in the separate in-vitro CCLE treatment response dataset. Next, we evaluated all FDA-approved biomarker-based cancer drug indications in TCGA and demonstrated that TARGETS predictions were concordant with established clinical indications. Finally, we performed independent clinical validation in the WCDT and found that the TARGETS AR signaling inhibitors (ARSI) signature successfully predicted clinical treatment response in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with a statistically significant interaction between the TARGETS score and PSA response (p = 0.0252). TARGETS represents a pan-cancer, platform-independent approach to predict response to oncologic therapies and could be used as a tool to better select patients for existing therapies as well as identify new indications for testing in prospective clinical trials.

A prospective, phase II trial of monotherapy with low-dose afatinib for patients with EGFR, mutation-positive, non-small cell lung cancer: Thoracic oncology research group 1632

OBJECTIVES

Afatinib is an effective treatment for patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the toxicity associated with this agent often leads to dose modifications. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy, safety and plasma concentrations of low dose afatinib monotherapy in patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a multicenter, single-arm, open-label, phase II trial involving treatment-naïve patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC. From March 2017 to September 2018, 53 patients were enrolled from 21 institutions in Japan. Patients initially received afatinib 20 mg/day orally. For patients in whom the tumor progressed within stable disease, the investigators were able to increase the afatinib dose (10 mg increments). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The threshold and expected median PFS was 9.2 and 13.8 months, respectively. Additionally, the correlation of the plasma concentration of low-dose afatinib with clinical outcome and adverse events were evaluated.

RESULTS

The median age of patients was 70 years (range: 37-85 years); 28 patients (52.8%) were females. The median duration of the follow-up was 20.8 months. The median PFS, and overall survival were 12.6 months (90% confidence interval [CI]: 9.7-14.3 months), and not reached, respectively. The primary endpoint was met. The objective response rate and disease control rate were 66.0% (95% CI: 51.7-78.5) and 92.5% (95% CI: 81.8-97.9), respectively. Grade ≥ 3 adverse events occurred in 12 patients (22.6%), including diarrhea in four patients (7.5%). The rate of adverse events was lower than that observed in previous phase III studies of 40 mg afatinib.

CONCLUSION

Based on its promising clinical efficacy and tolerability profile, monotherapy with low-dose afatinib should become one of the standard therapies for EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC.

Iterative Upgrading of Small Molecular Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for EGFR Mutation in NSCLC: Necessity and Perspective

Molecular targeted therapy has been reported to have fewer adverse effects, and offer a more convenient route of administration, compared with conventional chemotherapy. With the development of sequencing technology, and research on the molecular biology of lung cancer, especially whole-genome information on non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), various therapeutic targets have been unveiled. Among the NSCLC-driving gene mutations, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations are the most common, and approximately 10% of Caucasian, and more than 50% of Asian, NSCLC patients have been found to have sensitive EGFR mutations. A variety of targeted therapeutic agents for EGFR mutations have been approved for clinical applications, or are undergoing clinical trials around the world. This review focuses on: the indications of approved small molecular kinase inhibitors for EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC; the mechanisms of drug resistance and the corresponding therapeutic strategies; the principles of reasonable and precision molecular structure; and the drug development discoveries of next-generation inhibitors for EGFR.

Prognostic Factors in Lung Adenocarcinoma with Bone Metastasis Treated with EGFR-TKIs

Background and Objectives: Patients who have advanced lung cancer and bone metastasis (BM) often suffer from skeletal-related events (SREs) that lead to poor quality of life and poor prognosis. Our study aimed to investigate the prognostic factors in patients with BM from epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive lung adenocarcinoma. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 77 lung adenocarcinoma patients with synchronous BM. These patients had first-line EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) between January 2017 and December 2019. Among them, 42 patients were treated with 120 mg of subcutaneous denosumab monthly. We investigated their baseline characteristics, cancer management, SREs, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: The PFS in the patients treated with or without denosumab were 10.1 vs. 12.5 months (p = 0.971). The median OS was 26.9 vs. 29.5 months (p = 0.967) in no denosumab and denosumab groups, respectively. Univariate analyses showed benefit of afatinib in PFS and good performance status in OS. Conclusion: Those patients that took afatinib as first-line EGFR-TKIs had significantly longer PFS than those treated with other TKIs. Denosumab had no prognostic effect on PFS or OS.

An Observational Study to Assess the Molecular Epidemiology and Direct Medical Costs of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Mutations in Patients with Advanced EGFR Mutation-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Afatinib in Real-World Clinical Settings in Greece

Purpose

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the preferred first-line option for patients with advanced, EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Afatinib, a second-generation irreversible EGFR-TKI, has been extensively used in Greece in this setting; however, real-world data regarding molecular epidemiology and financial implications of afatinib use are lacking.

Materials and Methods

This was an observational, non-interventional, multicenter, retrospective cohort study, based on real-world data collected from the medical charts/records of patients treated with afatinib between 15/03/2015 and 25/06/2020 and were recorded on a web-based data capture system. Cox models were used to assess the prognostic significance of clinicopathological parameters with respect to clinical outcomes of interest. Cost analysis was conducted from a public third-payer perspective, and only direct medical costs reimbursed by the payer were considered.

Results

A total of 59 patients were treated with afatinib for their EGFR mutation-positive advanced NSCLC; the median age was 61 years (range: 37-91). Performance status was zero in 61%, and brain metastases were present in 13.6%. Forty-four patients (74.6%) had a deletion in exon 19 only, while nine (15.3%) had a mutation in exon 21, 8 of them in L858R and one in L861Q. At a median follow-up of 41.8 months (95% CI 35.9-51.4), the median PFS was 14.3 months (95% CI 12.2-16.4), and the median OS was 29 months (95% CI 25.6-33.4). Corresponding values for patients with deletion 19 only were 14.3 months (95% CI 11.5-18.5) and 28.1 months (95% CI 21.1-32.6), respectively. The mean expenditure for the treatment of each patient equals €25,333.68; with €21,865.06 being attributed to drug acquisition costs, €3325.35 to monitoring costs and €143.27 to adverse event treatment-related costs.

Conclusion

Long-term data in the real-world setting in Greece confirm activity, tolerability and cost-effectiveness of afatinib as first-line treatment of patients with advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC.

Clinical Trial Registration

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04640870.

The expanding capability and clinical relevance of molecular diagnostic technology to identify and evaluate EGFR mutations in advanced/metastatic NSCLC

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation testing in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has evolved rapidly over the past decade, largely triggered by the introduction of the targeted EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Initially used to detect common EGFR mutations and determine the most appropriate first-line therapy at diagnosis, testing methodologies have expanded to test for multiple mutations at multiple time points throughout the disease course. Here we review the current mutation testing approaches, including types of biopsies, and the available assays commonly used in the clinic. Specific application of these approaches in advanced NSCLC, including current guideline recommendations, and potential future developments are discussed.

Tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase 2 controls M2 macrophages polarization to promote esophageal squamous cell carcinoma progression via AKT/GSK3β/IL-8 signaling pathway

Tryptophan 2,3-dioxygnease 2 (TDO2) is specific for metabolizing tryptophan to kynurenine (KYN), which plays a critical role in mediating immune escape of cancer. Although accumulating evidence demonstrates that TDO2 overexpression is implicated in the development and progression of multiple cancers, its tumor-promoting role in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains unclear. Here, we observed that TDO2 was overexpressed in ESCC tissues and correlated significantly with lymph node metastasis, advanced clinical stage, and unfavorable prognosis. Functional experiments showed that TDO2 promoted tumor cell proliferation, migration, and colony formation, which could be prevented by inhibition of TDO2 and aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR). Further experimentation demonstrated that TDO2 could promote the tumor growth of KYSE150 tumor-bearing model, tumor burden of C57BL/6 mice with ESCC induced by 4-NQO, enhance the expression of phosphorylated AKT, with subsequent phosphorylation of GSK3β, and polarization of M2 macrophages by upregulating interleukin-8 (IL-8) to accelerate tumor progression in the tumor microenvironment (TME). Collectively, our results discovered that TDO2 could upregulate IL-8 through AKT/GSK3β to direct the polarization of M2 macrophages in ESCC, and suggested that TDO2 could represent as an attractive therapeutic target and prognostic marker to ESCC.

Prognostic model of long-term advanced stage (IIIB-IV) EGFR mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) survivors using real-life data

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of useful diagnostic tools to identify EGFR mutated NSCLC patients with long-term survival. This study develops a prognostic model using real world data to assist clinicians to predict survival beyond 24 months.

METHODS

EGFR mutated stage IIIB and IV NSCLC patients diagnosed between January 2009 and December 2017 included in the Spanish Lung Cancer Group (SLCG) thoracic tumor registry. Long-term survival was defined as being alive 24 months after diagnosis. A multivariable prognostic model was carried out using binary logistic regression and internal validation through bootstrapping. A nomogram was developed to facilitate the interpretation and applicability of the model.

RESULTS

505 of the 961 EGFR mutated patients identified in the registry were included, with a median survival of 27.73 months. Factors associated with overall survival longer than 24 months were: being a woman (OR 1.78); absence of the exon 20 insertion mutation (OR 2.77); functional status (ECOG 0-1) (OR 4.92); absence of central nervous system metastases (OR 2.22), absence of liver metastases (OR 1.90) or adrenal involvement (OR 2.35) and low number of metastatic sites (OR 1.22). The model had a good internal validation with a calibration slope equal to 0.781 and discrimination (optimism corrected C-index 0.680).

CONCLUSIONS

Survival greater than 24 months can be predicted from six pre-treatment clinicopathological variables. The model has a good discrimination ability. We hypothesized that this model could help the selection of the best treatment sequence in EGFR mutation NSCLC patients.

Association of EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Treatment With Progression-Free Survival Among Taiwanese Patients With Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma and EGFR Mutation

Background: There is limited data on the relative survival rate of first-line therapy of gefitinib, erlotinib (first-generation epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor [EGFR-TKI]), and afatinib (second-generation EGFR-TKI) in patients with EGFR-mutated advanced lung adenocarcinoma in real-world data, especially in the Asian population. This study aimed to compare the relative survival rate of gefitinib, erlotinib, and afatinib in patients with EGFR-mutated advanced lung adenocarcinoma by real-world data in Taiwan. Methods: This retrospective cohort population-based study included untreated adult patients diagnosed with advanced lung adenocarcinoma who were identified in the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database between 2014 and 2017. The date of EGFR-mutated advanced lung adenocarcinoma diagnosis was referred as index date. This outcome evaluated overall survival (OS) and time to treatment failure (TTF) between gefitinib, erlotinib, and afatinib. Switching EGFR-TKIs or chemotherapy and new development of brain metastases were proxies of TTF. Estimated relative treatment effects on OS and TTF among EGFR-TKIs were adjusted by inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) in Cox proportional hazards model. Propensity score (PS) matched pair analyses were performed as sensitivity analyses. Results: The study cohort included 3,695 patients initiated with gefitinib, 3,310 with erlotinib, and 3,041 with afatinib. The mean age among the three treatment groups was 70.4 (±11.6), 66.8 (±11.6), and 64.3 (±11.4) years, and the female percentage was 70.4, 58.6, and 57.7%, respectively. Afatinib showed longer median OS than gefitinib (23.9 vs. 21.3 months; adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 0.87; p < 0.001) and erlotinib (23.9 vs. 21.8 months; aHR, 0.87; p = 0.001). Consistent results were observed with TTF outcomes. For patients with brain metastases at diagnosis, afatinib showed similar OS with erlotinib (p = 0.917) but superior to gefitinib (p = 0.028). PS matching had similar results with IPTW adjustment in the study population. Conclusion: Afatinib as first-line therapy had better survival outcomes for EGFR-mutated advanced lung adenocarcinoma than gefitinib and erlotinib in the Taiwan population. Both erlotinib and afatinib demonstrated superior treatment effect in patients with initial brain metastases than gefitinib.

The Value of Population Screening in Advancing Personalized Medicine in the Field of Lung Cancer

During the past decade, progress has been made in the field of lung cancer molecular biology and onco-immunology, leading to prolonged survival of patients. The combination of increased fundamental knowledge and the pharmaceutical pipeline has allowed the development of various tyrosine kinase inhibitors, targeting numerous molecular alterations. These drugs are now available in daily practice and have transformed survival outcomes for patients harboring EGFR, ALK or ROS1 alterations. Multiple clinical trials are now ongoing in order to increase the number of approved drugs, thus overcoming the issues of rare mutations and tyrosine kinase inhibitors resistance. Immune checkpoint inhibitors development has also changed lung cancer outcomes, but underwhelming response rates highlight the need for immune biomarkers. While PD-L1 expression was the first approved immune biomarker, it has shown several limitations and new biomarkers have to be identified to predict response or resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Testing methods, molecular results and targeted therapeutic schedules will be harmonized in the coming years, with the help of dedicated molecular multidisciplinary boards.

Osimertinib in EGFR-Mutated Lung Cancer: A Review of the Existing and Emerging Clinical Data

The use of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors such as osimertinib has improved outcomes and quality of life for patients with EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Osimertinib has become the preferred EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKIs) for patients with these mutations after demonstrating superior efficacy compared to first generation EGFR TKIs, such as erlotinib and gefitinib. More recently osimertinib has also shown to be beneficial in patients with resectable NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations irrespective of whether they received adjuvant chemotherapy or not. The drug is now FDA approved in this setting. With osimertinib being used more commonly in earlier stage and front-line settings, we are more likely to see patients who develop resistance to this drug. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive review of the data with osimertinib in EGFR mutation positive NSCLC, potential resistance mechanisms and an overview of key ongoing clinical trials.

Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Exploratory Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of HAD-B1 for Dose-Finding in EGFR Mutation Positive and Locally Advanced or Metastatic NSCLC Subjects Who Need Afatinib Therapy

Afatinib is a target anticancer drug of the second-generation EGFR TKI type, showing an advantage in treatment effect compared to conventional chemotherapy. However, patients on EGFR-TKI drugs also usually progress after 9 to 13 months according to secondary resistance. HAD-B1 is composed of drugs that are effective against lung cancer. This study is an exploratory study to evaluate the efficacy and safety between dosage groups by conducting a clinical trial in subjects requiring afatinib drug treatment in non-small cell lung cancer with EGFR mutation positive to determine the optimal dosage for HAD-B1 administration. At the final visit compared to before administration, each change in the disease control rate was measured according to the HAD-B1 doses of the test group 1 (972 mg), the test group 2 (1944 mg), and the control group. The efficacy and safety of HAD-B1 were compared and evaluated through sub-evaluation variables. As a result of the study, there was no statistically significant difference in the disease control rate at 12 weeks after dosing, but complete and partial remission were evaluated as 1 patient each in the test group 1, and none in the other groups. There was no statistically significant difference between groups in the sub-evaluation variable. In addition, there was no problem of safety from taking the test drug. However, the initially planned number of subjects was 66, but the number of enrolled subjects was only 14, which may limit the results of this study.

The Utility of Next-Generation Sequencing in the Treatment Decision-Making for Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is a fast and relatively inexpensive method to sequence a large number of genes with crucial importance in cancer medicine. Nowadays, NGS is frequently used in diagnostic and therapeutic decisions in oncology; however, recently, it was demonstrated that only a few cancer sites actually benefit from this assessment. Moreover, the association of a mutant gene with a targeted drug is not always as predicted during in-vitro trials and is often not associated with tumor response. To predict the efficacy of such an association several classification systems have been developed. The present review aims to analyze the most important tumor agnostic treatment trials and assess how they shape selecting cancer patients for NGS. Moreover, it aims to determine how mutation-drug associations can be classified by their targetability and level of evidence of efficacy in non-small-cell lung cancer.

First- or second-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in a large, real-world cohort of patients with non-small cell lung cancer

Background

There are limited comparisons of first- and second-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in large, real-world cohorts of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations.

Methods

Patients with advanced NSCLC (N = 612) with common EGFR mutations receiving first-line gefitinib/erlotinib and afatinib were grouped and propensity-score matched. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and secondary T790M mutations were analyzed.

Results

The gefitinib/erlotinib and afatinib groups each contained 206 patients after matching. Compared with gefitinib/erlotinib, patients receiving afatinib achieved longer median PFS (16.3 versus 14.2 months; log-rank test p = 0.020) and had a lower risk of progression [hazard ratio (HR) 0.73 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.57-0.94); p = 0.017]. Median OS (37.3 versus 34.2 months; log-rank test p = 0.500) and reduction in risk of death [HR 0.89 (95% CI, 0.65-1.23); p = 0.476] did not differ significantly between groups. T790M positivity was significantly higher in the gefitinib/erlotinib than afatinib group (70.9% versus 44.6%, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that afatinib was independently associated with lower T790M positivity [odds ratio (OR) 0.27 (95% CI, 0.14-0.53); p < 0.001], whereas ⩾12 months PFS after EGFR-TKI treatment [OR 3.00 (95% CI, 1.56-5.98); p = 0.001] and brain metastasis [OR 2.12 (95% CI, 1.08-4.26); p = 0.030] were associated with higher T790M positivity. Sequential third-generation EGFR-TKI treatment was administered to 63 patients, in whom median OS after the second-third-generation and first-third-generation EGFR-TKI sequences were 38.8 and 29.1 months, respectively.

Conclusion

Compared with gefitinib/erlotinib, afatinib had a higher treatment efficacy and a lower secondary T790M positivity in a large, real-world cohort of Asian patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC.

The role of molecular heterogeneity targeting resistance mechanisms to lung cancer therapies

Introduction: The treatment scenario of lung cancer is rapidly evolving through time. In parallel, growing evidence is accumulating on different mechanisms of treatment resistance. Inter- and intra-tumor heterogeneity define the spatial and temporal tumor clonal evolution, that is at the basis of tumor progression and resistance to anticancer treatments.Areas covered: This review summarizes the available evidence on molecular heterogeneity in lung cancer, from diagnosis to the occurrence of treatment resistance. The application of novel molecular diagnostic methods to detect molecular heterogeneity, and the implications of understanding heterogeneity for drug development strategies are discussed, with focus on clinical relevance and impact on patients' survival.Expert opinion: The current knowledge of molecular heterogeneity allows to identify different molecular subgroups of patients within the same conventional tumor type. Deeper understanding of heterogeneity determinants and the possibility to comprehensively investigate tumor molecular patterns will lead to the development of personalized treatment approaches, with the final goal to overcome resistance and prolong survival in lung cancer patients.

Deregulated glutamate to pro-collagen conversion is associated with adverse outcome in lung cancer and may be targeted by renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAS) inhibition

BACKGROUND

The tumor-microenvironment (TME) represents an attractive therapeutic target in NSCLC and plays an important role for efficacy of cancer therapeutics. We hypothesized that upregulation of collagen synthesis might be associated with adverse outcome in NSCLC. Literature evidence suggests that renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi) decrease collagen deposition. Therefore, we aimed to explore the prognostic role of RASi intake and their influence on the TME in NSCLC.

METHODS

Four publicly available datasets were used to evaluate the impact of key enzymes involved in collagen biosynthesis. To investigate the influence of RASi intake on the TME and prognosis we evaluated a cohort of metastatic NSCLC patients and performed histopathological characterization of the TME. A three-dimensional microtissue in vitro model was developed to define the impact of RASi on collagen synthesis.

RESULTS

Expression of three genes of the collagen synthesis pathway, ALDH18A1, PLOD2 and P4HA1, was upregulated in NSCLC compared to normal lung tissue and linked to shortened overall survival in all investigated cohorts. Together, these genes formed a 'Collagen Signature' which represents an independent unfavourable prognostic factor in two NSCLC cohorts and was linked to alterations of the extracellular matrix deposition and cell cycle pathways. In the cohort of metastatic NSCLC, RASi intake was linked to improved overall response rate and survival. Exploratory in vitro experiments revealed that RASi led to a dose dependent reduction of collagen deposition and degradation of three-dimensional lung cancer cell spheroids.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrate that collagen synthesis is a key upregulated process in the NSCLC TME and its transcriptional readout, the three gene Collagen Signature is independently associated with poor outcome. Pharmacological targeting of this pathways e.g. by RASi bears potential of improving outcome in NSCLC.

An open-label expanded access program of afatinib in EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor-naïve patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer harboring EGFR mutations

BACKGROUND

Afatinib is approved globally for EGFR-TKI treatment-naïve patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this Korean expanded access program, we evaluated its 'real-world' safety and efficacy.

METHODS

EGFR-TKI treatment-naïve patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC received afatinib 40 mg/day until disease progression or other withdrawal criteria. Dose reductions were permitted for adverse events (AEs). The primary endpoint was the number of patients with AEs (CTCAE version 3.0). Other endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), and changes in investigator-assessed cancer-related symptoms.

RESULTS

Eighty-eight patients received afatinib, including 27 (31%) with brain metastases and 16 (18%) with uncommon EGFR mutations. Median PFS was 17.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 12.9-23.3 months). Grade 3 treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) were reported in 51 (58%) patients; the most common were diarrhea (22%) and rash/acne (20%). No grade > 3 TRAEs were reported. AEs leading to dose reduction occurred in 49 (56%) patients. Treatment discontinuation due to TRAEs occurred in 4 (5%) patients. ORR was 81% overall, 89% in patients with brain metastases, and 55% in patients with uncommon mutations (excluding T790M/exon 20 insertions). Median DOR was 15.1 months (95% CI 12.4-21.4 months). Cancer-related symptoms were improved/unchanged/worsened in 34-66%/36-66%/0-3% of patients over the first year.

CONCLUSIONS

No unexpected safety signals for afatinib were observed. AEs were manageable; the treatment discontinuation rate was low. Afatinib showed encouraging efficacy in a broad patient population including those with brain metastases or tumors harboring uncommon EGFR mutations.

TRIALS REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01931306 ; 29/08/2013.

A Multicenter Retrospective Study on the Prognosis of Stage III Unresectable Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Therapy

Background

For unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), concurrent chemoradiotherapy is nowadays the standard treatment. Patients with advanced NSCLC harboring driver-gene mutations benefit from Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs) Therapy. In a real-world setting, there is room for exploring the benefit of TKIs in stage III unresectable NSCLC patients with mutation.

Methods

A total of 81 patients from the Jinling Hospital and the Jiangsu Cancer Hospital with stage III unresectable mutant NSCLC applied targeted therapy were enrolled in this retrospective study. Patients with first-line application of TKIs were followed up to gain the situation of surgery qualifications, progression-free survival and overall survival, so as to evaluate the survival prognosis, then whether patients benefit and what kind of patients benefit most from TKI monotherapy treatment or its combination are explored.

Results

The median progression-free survival of involved 81 patients was 13.87 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 11.66-16.08), and the median survival was 41.47 months (95%CI: 20.11-62.83). The 5-year survival rates were 91.0, 80.3, 56.1, 45.5, and 32.5%, respectively. After first-line TKI therapy, seven patients (8.6%) were reevaluated as eligible for surgery and proceeded to surgery. Although no characteristics were found to be statistical prognostic, younger female non-smokers still tended to have a better prognosis with longer progression free survival and overall survival.

Conclusions

TKIs are a viable option for mutant stage III unresectable NSCLC patients who have achieved good clinical benefit from TKI. Patients who cannot tolerate chemoradiotherapy, especially those with driver gene mutations, can choose targeted therapy for first-line treatment.

Afatinib in EGFR TKI-Naïve Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic EGFR Mutation-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Pooled Analysis of Three Phase IIIb Studies

Background

Afatinib is approved for first-line treatment of patients with epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-positive (EGFRm+) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, we report findings from a combined analysis of three phase IIIb studies of afatinib in EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-naïve patients.

Methods

EGFR-TKI-naïve patients with EGFRm+ NSCLC received afatinib 40 mg/day. Dose reductions were permitted for adverse events (AEs). Efficacy endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), time to symptomatic progression (TTSP), and tumor response. Subgroup analyses were performed by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS), presence of brain metastasis, age and common/uncommon EGFR mutations (plus other factors).

Results

1108 patients were treated. Median age was 61 years (range, 25-89); 19.2% had baseline brain metastases, 4.4% had ECOG PS ≥2, and 17.9% had tumors harboring uncommon mutations. Treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) were reported in 97.2%, most commonly diarrhea and rash. 41.6% had AEs leading to dose reduction. Median PFS was 13.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 12.0-13.8]; median TTSP was 14.8 months (95% CI: 13.9-16.1). Objective response rate (ORR) was 55.0%. Age, presence of baseline brain metastases, major (G719X, L861Q, S768I) or compound uncommon mutations had little/no effect on PFS, TTSP, or ORR, while outcomes were poorer in patients with ECOG PS 2 or exon 20 insertion/T790M mutations.

Conclusions

Afatinib was tolerable with no new safety signals. Afatinib demonstrated encouraging efficacy in a broad patient population, including those with brain metastases or uncommon EGFR mutations.

Endonuclease IV-Regulated DNAzyme Motor for Universal Single-nucleotide Variation Discrimination

Single-nucleotide variation (SNV) detection plays significant roles in disease diagnosis and treatment. Generally, auxiliary probe, restricted design rules, complicated detection system, and repeated experimental parameter optimization are needed to obtain satisfactory tradeoff between sensitivity and selectivity for SNV discrimination, especially when different mutant sites need to be distinguished. To overcome these limitations, we developed a universal, straightforward, and relatively cheap SNV discrimination strategy, which simultaneously possessed high sensitivity and selectivity. The excellent performance of this strategy was ascribed to the SNV discrimination property of endonuclease IV (Endo IV) and the different hydrolysis behavior between free deoxyribozyme (DNAzyme) and the trapped DNAzyme to the substrates modified on gold nanoparticles (AuNPs). When Endo IV recognized the mutant-type target (MT), free DNAzyme was released from the probe, and the DNAzyme motor was activated with the help of cofactor Mn²⁺ to generate an amplified fluorescence signal. On the contrary, the wild-type target (WT) could not effectively trigger the DNAzyme motor. Moreover, for different SNV types, the corresponding probe could be designed by simply changing the sequence hybridized with the target and retaining the DNAzyme sequence. Thus, the fluorescence signal generation system does not need to change for different SNV targets. Five clinical-related SNVs were determined with the limit of detection (LOD) ranging from 0.01 to 0.05%, which exhibited competitive sensitivity over existing SNV detection methods. This strategy provided another insight into the properties of Endo IV and DNAzyme, expanded the applications of DNAzyme motor, and has great potential to be used for precision medicine.

A Real-World, Observational, Prospective Study to Assess the Molecular Epidemiology of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Mutations upon Progression on or after First-Line Therapy with a First- or Second-Generation EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor in EGFR Mutation-Positive Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: The 'LUNGFUL' Study

Simple Summary

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for approximately 85% of lung cancer cases, with few patients carrying driver mutations in the gene encoding for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Advances in translational research have established EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) as the standard first-line therapy for NSCLC patients with activating EGFR mutations. The aim of our observational study was to assess the frequency of T790M acquired resistance and predictors of its presence, in patients with EGFR-mutated locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC who have progressed in the first-line EGFR-TKI treatment setting with first- or second-generation TKIs and have undergone molecular testing in tissue and/or plasma biopsy. The study highlights the challenges of performing tissue re-biopsy in routine care settings, which can lead to patients considered non-eligible for certain therapies from which they can benefit, and merits further actions from the healthcare community, in order to establish re-biopsy as a standard procedure.

Abstract

Background: Real-world data on the molecular epidemiology of EGFR resistance mutations at or after progression with first- or second-generation EGFR-TKIs in patients with advanced NSCLC are lacking. Methods: This ongoing observational study was carried out by 23 hospital-based physicians in Greece. The decision to perform cobas^®EGFR Mutation Test v2 in tissue and/or plasma at disease progression was made before enrollment. For patients with negative/inconclusive T790M plasma-based results, tissue re-biopsy could be performed. Results: Ninety-six (96) eligible patients were consecutively enrolled (median age: 67.8 years) between July-2017 and September-2019. Of the patients, 98% were tested upon progression using plasma and 2% using tissue/cytology biopsy. The T790M mutation was detected in 16.0% of liquid biopsies. Tissue re-biopsy was performed in 22.8% of patients with a T790M-negative plasma result. In total, the T790M positivity rate was 21.9%, not differing between patients on first- or second-generation EGFR-TKI. Higher (≥2) ECOG performance status and longer (≥10 months) time to disease progression following EGFR-TKI treatment initiation were associated with T790M positivity. Conclusions: Results from plasma/tissue-cytology samples in a real-world setting, yielded a T790M positivity rate lower than previous reports. Fewer than one in four patients with negative plasma-based testing underwent tissue re-biopsy, indicating the challenges in routine care settings.

Real-world outcomes of first- and second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors first-line in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer: A retrospective observational cohort study

The sequencing of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) in patients with EGFR mutation-positive (EGFRm+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains a matter of controversy. This cohort study analyzed the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of afatinib compared with erlotinib and gefitinib first-line. EGFRm+, advanced NSCLC patients treated with either afatinib, erlotinib or gefitinib were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 107 patients were included. There was no statistically significant difference in PFS among the 3 groups. In the ≥ 60 years age group, the afatinib group had longer survival compared to the gefitinib group (p = 0.01). Median OS were 19.1, 22.9, and 35.6 months for gefitinib, erlotinib, and afatinib groups, respectively, with statistical significance between the gefitinib and afatinib groups (p = 0.009). Patients on afatinib also had longer median OS than erlotinib and gefitinib pooled together (35.5 versus 21.4 months; hazard ratio = 0.54, p = 0.016), despite similar median PFS. In conclusion, afatinib is a better choice compared to gefitinib or erlotinib for EGFRm+ patients. The OS obtained with afatinib is just 3 months shorter than osimertinib in the FLAURA trial. Direct comparison studies with osimertinib are still needed to determine optimal sequencing.

Optimal sequencing strategies in the treatment of EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer: Clinical benefits and cost-effectiveness

Purpose

To summarize current understanding of the efficacy, role, and cost-effectiveness of the available epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), and to evaluate sequencing strategies based on the available evidence.

Summary. EGFR TKIs are the current standard of care for patients with EGFR mutation–positive non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Five EGFR TKIs are currently approved in the United States for use in a first-line setting; these TKIs differ in mechanism of action, efficacy, safety, and cost. Most patients develop resistance to first-line EGFR TKIs and require subsequent therapy with additional EGFR TKIs, chemotherapy, and/or other targeted agents. A major consideration when selecting EGFR TKIs, both as first-line or subsequent treatment options, is cost-effectiveness. Although clinical trials have shown that the second- and third-generation EGFR TKIs are superior in efficacy to the first-generation agents, pharmacoeconomic studies suggest that the first-generation agents are the most cost-effective, with the second-generation TKI afatinib also considered cost-effective in some studies. Despite its impressive efficacy, osimertinib appears to be less cost-effective due to substantially higher acquisition costs.

Conclusion

Preliminary data suggest that first-line afatinib followed by osimertinib may offer promising survival outcomes and, on the basis of efficacy alone, may represent an optimal sequencing strategy in the majority of patients with EGFR mutation–positive NSCLC, in particular Asian patients and those with Del19-positive tumors. However, considerably more research into outcomes and costs associated with consecutive sequencing of EGFR TKIs is needed before any conclusions can be reached.

Efficacy and safety of first-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) combined with chemotherapy or antiangiogenic therapy as first-line treatment in patients with EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a meta-analysis to synthesize the results of published randomized controlled trials conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of epidermal growth factor receptor - tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) combined with chemotherapy or antiangiogenic therapy.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched and literatures from international conferences were read to identify eligible studies. The primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and progression free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints were disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS) and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs).

RESULTS

10 studies, all on first-generation EGFR-TKI combination therapy, involving 2367 patients were included. Combination therapy resulted in significant improvements in ORR (RR: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.06-1.17, P < 0.001), DCR (RR: 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01-1.05, P = 0.007), PFS (HR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.51-0.62, P < 0.001), OS (HR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.64-0.84, P = 0.002) over monotherapy. This improvement was more apparent in the EGFR-TKIs combination chemotherapy group, and indirect comparisons revealed that EGFR-TKIs combined with chemotherapy appeared to be superior to combined with antiangiogenic therapy in ORR (RR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.07-1.32), DCR (RR: 1.04, 95% CI: 1.02-1.08), and OS (HR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.66-0.96). Of additional concern is the increased incidence of TEAEs in combination therapy.

CONCLUSION

As a first-line treatment for patients with EGFR-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), first-generation EGFR-TKIs combined with chemotherapy or antiangiogenic therapy was associated with significant improvement in ORR, DCR, PFS and OS compared with monotherapy.

Osimertinib in patients with advanced/metastatic epidermal growth factor receptor T790M mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer - the Belgian ASTRIS data

Objectives: The aim of ASTRIS, a real-world study, was to assess the safety and efficacy of osimertinib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic (stage IIIB-IV) epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) T790M mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who had received prior EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. Here, we describe the Belgian subset of the global ASTRIS study.Methods: Patients received osimertinib orally as one 80 mg tablet once daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Socio-demographic data, medical history, disease progression and survival status were collected and molecular testing for EGFR status was performed. Safety was also assessed. All collected data were summarized using descriptive statistics.Results: Of the 31 Belgian patients enrolled in the study, 9 (29.0%) discontinued treatment for disease progression and 5 (16.1%) due to other reasons. Among the 31 patients treated with osimertinib, 16 (51.6%, 95% CI 33.1-69.8) had a clinical response and 13 (41.9%) had stable disease as best response assessed by the investigator, with a disease control rate of 93.5%. The clinical response rate was 66.7% (6/9) in patients with brain/leptomeningeal metastases and 50.0% (4/8) in patients without brain/leptomeningeal metastases. About one third of the patients (11/31) reported at least one adverse event (AE) (35.5%) or serious AE (10/31; 32.3%) and 3/31 (9.7%) patients discontinued treatment due to AEs.Conclusion: We here demonstrate the effectiveness of osimertinib in a real-world setting in Belgian patients with locally advanced or metastatic T790M-positive NSCLC who had received previous EGFR-TKI treatment. No new safety signals were identified.

Afatinib as first-line treatment in patients with EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer in routine clinical practice

Background:

Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related death in Germany and worldwide. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) comprises ~80% of lung cancer diagnoses; in White patients, around 10% of NSCLC cases are epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-positive (EGFRm+). Head-to-head clinical trials have demonstrated superior efficacy with second-/third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) versus first-generation EGFR TKIs in EGFRm+ NSCLC. Data from routine clinical practice are necessary to confirm that clinical trial findings are transferable to real-world populations.

Methods:

In NCT02047903, a prospective non-interventional study in Germany, patients with EGFRm+ NSCLC received first-line afatinib until disease progression or intolerable adverse events. Key objectives were progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 12 months, objective response rate (ORR) and overall survival (OS). Safety/tolerability was also assessed.

Results:

Of 152 patients, 106 (69.7%) were female, 20 (13.1%) patients had an uncommon EGFR mutation and 51 patients (33.6%) had brain metastases. A starting dose of <40 mg was received by 39 (25.7%) patients. Overall, the 12-month PFS rate was 50.2% while the median PFS was 12.2 months. The ORR was 74.6% and the median OS was 30.4 months. In patients with brain metastases and uncommon mutations, the median PFS was 10.5 and 10.7 months, and the ORR was 77.3% and 83.3%, respectively. Treatment effectiveness was similar in patients with a starting dose of <40 mg (median PFS: 16.4 months; ORR, 81.3%) and a starting dose of 40 mg (median PFS: 10.8 months; ORR, 72.1%). Adverse drug reactions were manageable and consistent with the known afatinib safety profile.

Conclusion:

The results support clinical trial data for afatinib in routine clinical practice, including in patients generally excluded from clinical trials. Outcomes were positive in patients with uncommon EGFR mutations and in those with brain metastases. Treatment benefit was also seen in patients receiving a <40 mg afatinib starting dose, supporting patient-tailored dosing.

Sarcopenia as a predictor of initial administration dose of afatinib in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Sarcopenia has recently emerged as a new condition with increasing importance in lung cancer patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of sarcopenia on tolerance and efficacy of afatinib.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 35 patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutant advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with first-line afatinib. Skeletal muscle area (SMA) was measured at the third lumbar vertebra using routine conducted computed tomography (CT) images for evaluation of disease burden. Sarcopenia was defined as skeletal muscle index (SMI = SMA/height² ) ≤38.5 cm² /m² for women and ≤52.4 cm² /m² for men based on previous criteria. Fisher's exact tests, Kaplan-Meier method, and logistic regression modeling were used.

RESULTS

The median age at diagnosis was 65 years (range,39-84 years). A total of 24 (68.6%) patients were diagnosed with sarcopenia. The most frequent adverse events (AEs) related to afatinib were diarrhea (94.3%) followed by rash (77.1%) and paronychia (60%). Overall, 19 (54.3%) patients had dose reduction. Sarcopenic patients had a significantly higher rate of grade ≥ 2 diarrhea (75.0 vs. 27.3%, p = 0.011) and toxicity-related dose reduction (75.0 vs. 9.1%, p = 0.001). Multivariate analysis also showed that sarcopenia (odds ratio [OR] 51.7, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.4-1081.3, p = 0.01) was an independent risk factor for dose reduction of afatinib. The median progression-free survival (PFS) for afatinib was 12.0 months (95% CI: 10.6-13.4). Both dose reduction and sarcopenia did not affect therapeutic efficacy.

CONCLUSIONS

Toxicity-related dose reduction is common with initiation of afatinib 40 mg/day. Sarcopenic patients might begin treatment with a low dose of afatinib according to tolerance.

EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors for EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: outcomes in Asian populations

Few data are available that have compared outcomes with different EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) specifically in Asian patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. In this narrative review, we have collated available data from prospective studies that have assessed first-, second- and third-generation EGFR TKIs in Asian populations, including subanalyses in individual countries (China and Japan). These data indicate that outcomes with first- and second-generation TKIs are broadly similar in Asian and non-Asian populations. However, while the third-generation EGFR TKI, osimertinib, confers significant overall survival benefit over erlotinib/gefitinib in non-Asians, this is not apparent in Asians, particularly in countries like Japan with well-resourced healthcare. Head-to-head comparisons of second- and third-generation EGFR TKIs, with OS as a primary end point, should be considered in Asia.

Toxicity profile of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors for patients with lung cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are treatments commonly used for lung cancer. The toxicity profile including toxicity incidence, severity, and spectrum (involving various specific adverse events) of each EGFR-TKI are of particular clinical interest and importance. Data from phase II and III randomized controlled trials comparing treatments among EGFR-TKIs (osimertinib, dacomitinib, afatinib, erlotinib, gefitinib, and icotinib) and chemotherapy for lung cancer were synthesized with Bayesian network meta-analysis. The primary outcome was systemic all-grade and grade ≥3 adverse events. The secondary outcome was specific all-grade adverse events including those of the skin, gastrointestinal tract, lung, etc. 40 trials randomizing 13,352 patients were included. Generally greater toxicity for dacomitinib and afatinib, and safety for icotinib were suggested. Furthermore, we found individual EGFR-TKIs had different toxicity spectrums. These findings provide a compelling safety reference for the individualized use of EGFR-TKIs for patients with lung cancer.

Comparing survival and subsequent treatment of first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients of advanced lung adenocarcinoma with epidermal growth factor receptor mutation

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Three first-line epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are widely available to treat advanced lung adenocarcinoma harboring EGFR mutation. However, studies comparing efficacy or effectiveness of these EGFR TKIs came out with inconclusive results.

METHODS

In this real-world data analysis with a nationwide retrospective cohort design, adult patients with newly diagnosed advanced lung adenocarcinoma with EGFR mutation between 2011 and 2016, who received a first-line EGFR TKI, were included. Overall survival (OS) and time to next treatment (TTNT) were compared between patients receiving different EGFR TKIs after overlap weighting.

RESULTS

We enrolled 10,431 patients, including 6,230, 2,359, and 1842 in gefitinib, erlotinib, and afatinib groups, respectively. The median (95% confidence interval [CI]) OS were 24.2 (22.9-26.2), 25.7 (24.0-27.9), and 29.1 (25.8-32.1) months for those receiving gefitinib, erlotinib, and afatinib, respectively (p = 0.001). The hazard ratios (95% CI) for the afatinib group were 0.85 (0.74-0.98) and 0.91 (0.79-1.05) comparing with the gefitinib and erlotinib groups, respectively. The median (95% CI) TTNT were 10.9 (10.4-11.2), 11.7 (11.3-12.1), 13.4 (12.5-14.3) months for those receiving gefitinib, erlotinib, and afatinib, respectively (p < 0.001). The hazard ratios (95% CI) for the afatinib group were 0.79 (0.70-0.88) and 0.89 (0.79-1.00) comparing with the gefitinib and erlotinib groups, respectively. There were 6111 (59%) patients receiving subsequent therapies, and the majority of them received a second-line chemotherapy, particularly platinum-based chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Afatinib, compared with gefitinib, might provide better effectiveness as the first-line targeted therapy for patients of advanced lung adenocarcinoma with EGFR mutation.

Development of a Genomic Signatures-Based Predictor of Initial Platinum-Resistance in Advanced High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer Patients

BACKGROUND

High grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) is the most common subtype of ovarian cancer. Although platinum-based chemotherapy has been the cornerstone for HGSOC treatment, nearly 25% of patients would have less than 6 months of interval since the last platinum chemotherapy, referred to as platinum-resistance. Currently, no precise tools to predict platinum resistance have been developed yet.

METHODS

Ninety-nine HGSOC patients, who have finished cytoreductive surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy in Peking University Third Hospital from 2018 to 2019, were enrolled. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) and whole-exome sequencing (WES) were performed on the collected tumor tissue samples to establish a platinum-resistance predictor in a discovery cohort of 57 patients, and further validated in another 42 HGSOC patients.

RESULTS

A high prevalence of alterations in DNA damage repair (DDR) pathway, including BRCA1/2, was identified both in the platinum-sensitive and resistant HGSOC patients. Compared with the resistant subgroup, there was a trend of higher prevalence of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) in the platinum-sensitive subgroup (78.95% vs. 47.37%, p=0.0646). Based on the HRD score, microhomology insertions and deletions (MHID), copy number changes load, duplication load of 1-100 kb, single nucleotide variants load, and eight other mutational signatures, a combined predictor of platinum-resistance, named as DRDscore, was established. DRDscore outperformed in predicting the platinum-sensitivity than the previously reported biomarkers with a predictive accuracy of 0.860 at a threshold of 0.7584. The predictive performance of DRDscore was validated in an independent cohort of 42 HGSOC patients with a sensitivity of 90.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

A multi-genomic signature-based analysis enabled the prediction of initial platinum resistance in advanced HGSOC patients, which may serve as a novel assessment of platinum resistance, provide therapeutic guidance, and merit further validation.

A phase II study of first-line afatinib for patients aged ≥75 years with EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer: North East Japan Study Group trial NEJ027

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer is most common among older individuals. However, polypharmacy and comorbidities, which are also more common in older individuals, can limit treatment options. Previous studies suggest that afatinib can be used safely and effectively in elderly patients. This study investigated the anti-tumour activity and safety profile of first-line afatinib in previously-untreated elderly Japanese patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

This was a single-arm, open-label, phase II study, performed in multiple centres in Japan. Previously untreated patients, aged ≥75 years, with EGFR mutation-positive (Del19 or L858R) advanced NSCLC were treated with afatinib 40 mg until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Adverse events (AEs) were managed with protocol-defined dose adjustments. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) by central review.

RESULTS

In total, 38 patients received at least one dose of afatinib, and 37 were evaluable for response. Median age was 77.5 years (range 75-91), all patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, and 60.5% had Del19-positive disease. Median follow-up was 838 days. ORR was 75.7% (2 complete responses and 26 partial responses). Median progression-free survival was 14.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.5-19.0). Median overall survival (OS) was 35.2 months (95% CI, 35.2-not reached); the 2-year OS rate was 78.3%. The most common grade 3/4 treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) were diarrhoea (28.9%), paronychia (23.7%), and rash/acne (15.8%). Dose reductions due to TRAEs were reported in 78.9% of patients, and eight (21.1%) patients discontinued afatinib due to TRAEs. No treatment-related deaths were reported.

CONCLUSION

Although dose adjustments were relatively common in this small group of Japanese patients aged ≥75 years with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC, discontinuation occurred much less frequently, and most patients were able to stay on treatment for well over a year. Further, afatinib was associated with high response rates and prolonged PFS and OS.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial is registered with Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (JRCT) as trial number 031180136 (date of initial registration: 19 February 2019), and the University Hospital Network (UMIN) as trial number 000017877 (date of initial registration: 11 June 2015).

Improvement of EGFR Testing over the Last Decade and Impact of Delaying TKI Initiation

Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is the most common oncogenic mutation in lung adenocarcinoma and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been considered standard treatment for more than a decade. However, time to initiation of TKIs (TTIT) from diagnosis is often delayed and represents a challenge for clinicians. We aimed to assess the impact of TTIT on clinical outcomes and complications. Method: TTIT was defined as the time between confirmed advanced diagnosis and the initiation of a TKI. Complications during this pre-TKI period were retrospectively collected from all patients with EGFR-mutant non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in our institution. Results: 102 patients were diagnosed with EGFR mutated NSCLC between 2006 and 2019. The median PFS and OS were 12.9 and 22.5 months, respectively. TTIT was 5.7 months (95% CI 3.4–8) with a significant decrease in the latter years of this cohort. During the pre-TKI period, 23 patients received chemotherapy as first line treatment, of which 5 developed severe adverse events and 3 were not fit to receive TKI thereafter. Additionally, 29 patients had rapid clinical deterioration before initiation of first line TKI and 16 had to be hospitalized. Among the patients presenting a performance status deterioration, their prognosis was markedly affected compared to the remainder of the cohort (p = 0.01). Conclusion: Our real-world evidence study supports the concept that a delay to treat EGFR mutant NSCLC with TKIs is associated with adverse events, patient progression, hospitalization, and decreased overall survival. Rapid molecular diagnosis, including access to ctDNA technology may circumvent these deleterious delays.

Dacomitinib in first-line treatment of advanced EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis

Aim: To assess the cost-effectiveness of first-line treatment with dacomitinib compared with gefitinib in patients newly diagnosed with advanced NSCLC EGFR-positive in the context of Spain. Materials & methods: A partitioned survival model was developed including costs, utilities and disutilities to estimate quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio when treating with dacomitinib versus gefitinib. Results: Dacomitinib presented higher QALYs (0.51) compared with gefitinib (0.45). Dacomitinib costs were €33,061 in comparison with €26,692 for gefitinib arm. An incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of €111,048 was obtained for dacomitinib. Conclusion: Dacomitinib was more effective in terms of QALYs gained than gefitinib. However, to obtain a cost-effectiveness alternative, a discount greater than 25% in dacomitinib acquisition cost is required.

Safety and efficacy of first-line dacomitinib in Asian patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer: Results from a randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial (ARCHER 1050)

OBJECTIVES

To compare efficacy and safety of dacomitinib versus gefitinib as first-line therapy for EGFR mutation-positive advanced NSCLC in Asian patients enrolled in the ongoing ARCHER 1050 trial.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this ongoing, randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial (NCT01774721), eligible patients with newly diagnosed advanced EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC were randomized (1:1) to receive oral dacomitinib 45 mg/day or oral gefitinib 250 mg/day. Randomization, by a central computer system, was stratified by race and EGFR mutation type (exon 19 deletion mutation/exon 21 L858R substitution mutation). The primary endpoint was PFS by blinded independent review.

RESULTS

Of 346 Asian patients, 170 were randomized to dacomitinib and 176 to gefitinib. The hazard ratio (HR) for PFS with dacomitinib versus gefitinib was 0.509 (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.391-0.662; 1-sided p < 0.0001; median 16.5 months [95 % CI: 12.9-18.4] vs. 9.3 months [95 % CI: 9.2-11.0]). HR for OS with dacomitinib versus gefitinib was 0.759 (95 % CI: 0.578-0.996; median 37.7 months [95 % CI: 30.2-44.7] vs. 29.1 months [95 % CI: 25.6-36.0]). The OS benefit was still maintained in those patients who had a stepwise dose reduction of dacomitinib (to 30 and 15 mg/day). The most common adverse events (AEs) were diarrhea (154 [90.6 %] patients), paronychia (110 [64.7 %]), dermatitis acneiform (96 [56.5 %]), and stomatitis (87 [51.2 %]) with dacomitinib, and diarrhea (100 [56.8 %]), alanine aminotransferase increased (81 [46.0 %]), and aspartate aminotransferase increased (75 [42.6 %]) with gefitinib. Treatment-related serious AEs were reported in 16 (9.4 %) and 8 (4.5 %) patients treated with dacomitinib and gefitinib, respectively.

CONCLUSION

First-line dacomitinib was associated with significant prolongation of PFS and improved OS compared with gefitinib in Asian patients with EGFR mutation-positive advanced NSCLC. The AE profiles of dacomitinib and gefitinib in Asian patients were consistent with the overall ARCHER 1050 population.

Targeted Therapy in Advanced and Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. An Update on Treatment of the Most Important Actionable Oncogenic Driver Alterations

Due to groundbreaking developments and continuous progress, the treatment of advanced and metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has become an exciting, but increasingly challenging task. This applies, in particular, to the subgroup of NSCLC with oncogenic driver alterations. While the treatment of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-rearranged NSCLC with various tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is well-established, new targets have been identified in the last few years and new TKIs introduced in clinical practice. Even for KRAS mutations, considered for a long time as an "un-targetable" alteration, promising new drugs are emerging. The detection and in-depth molecular analysis of resistance mechanisms has further fueled the development of new therapeutic strategies. The objective of this review is to give a comprehensive overview on the current landscape of targetable oncogenic alterations in NSCLC.

Identification of a novel CpG methylation signature to predict prognosis in lung squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

DNA methylation plays a vital role in modulating genomic function and warrants evaluation as a biomarker for the diagnosis and treatment of lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC).

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we aimed to identify effective potential biomarkers for predicting prognosis and drug sensitivity in LUSC.

METHODS

A univariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, a random survival forests-variable hunting (RSFVH) algorithm, and a multivariate Cox regression analysis were adopted to analyze the methylation profile of patients with LUSC included in public databases: The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), and the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO).

RESULTS

A methylated region consisting of 3 sites (cg06675147, cg07064331, cg20429172) was selected. Patients were divided into a high-risk group and a low-risk group in the training dataset. High-risk patients had shorter overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.72, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.82-4.07, P< 0.001) compared with low-risk patients. The accuracy of the prognostic signature was validated in the test and validation cohorts (TCGA, n= 94; GSE56044, n= 23). Gene set variation analysis (GSVA) showed that activity in the cell cycle/mitotic, ERBB, and ERK/MAPK pathways was higher in the high-risk compared with the low-risk group, which may lead to differences in OS.Interestingly, we observed that patients in the high-risk group were more sensitive to gemcitabine and docetaxel than the low-risk group, which is consistent with results of the GSVA.

CONCLUSION

We report novel methylation sites that could be used as powerful tools for predicting risk factors for poorer survival in patients with LUSC.

Impact of Advantage in Tumor Response on the Correlation Between Progression-Free Survival and Overall Survival: Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Progression-free survival (PFS) has not been validated as a surrogate endpoint for overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate an impact of advantage in tumor response on the correlation between PFS and OS in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

METHODS

Based on a literature search, we identified randomized controlled trials of first-line therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer. The impact of absolute difference in objective response rate between treatment arms on the correlation between hazard ratios (HRs) for PFS and OS was evaluated based on Spearman rank correlation coefficients.

RESULTS

Sixty trials with a total of 29,134 patients were identified. The HR for PFS showed a relatively higher correlation with HR for OS (r_s = 0.75) when the trials were limited to those that demonstrated a larger advantage in objective response rate, compared with the case for trials that demonstrated a smaller advantage (r_s = 0.66). This tendency was also observed in the subgroup analysis stratified by the types of treatment agents (non-targeted, anti-angiogenic, and immunotherapy) except for the group of epidermal growth factor receptor-targeted agents.

CONCLUSIONS

The magnitude of advantage in tumor response was suggested to contribute to a better prediction of OS-HR based on PFS-HR in clinical trials in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Molecular and Clinical Features of EGFR-TKI-Associated Lung Injury

The tyrosine kinase activity of epidermal growth factor receptors (EGFRs) plays critical roles in cell proliferation, regeneration, tumorigenesis, and anticancer resistance. Non-small-cell lung cancer patients who responded to EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) and obtained survival benefits had somatic EGFR mutations. EGFR-TKI-related adverse events (AEs) are usually tolerable and manageable, although serious AEs, including lung injury (specifically, interstitial lung disease (ILD), causing 58% of EGFR-TKI treatment-related deaths), occur infrequently. The etiopathogenesis of EGFR-TKI-induced ILD remains unknown. Risk factors, such as tobacco exposure, pre-existing lung fibrosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and poor performance status, indicate that lung inflammatory circumstances may worsen with EGFR-TKI treatment because of impaired epithelial healing of lung injuries. There is limited evidence from preclinical and clinical studies of the mechanisms underlying EGFR-TKI-induced ILD in the available literature. Herein, we evaluated the relationship between EGFR-TKIs and AEs, especially ILD. Recent reports on mechanisms inducing lung injury or resistance in cytokine-rich circumstances were reviewed. We discussed the relevance of cytotoxic agents or immunotherapeutic agents in combination with EGFR-TKIs as a potential mechanism of EGFR-TKI-related lung injury and reviewed recent developments in diagnostics and therapeutics that facilitate recovery from lung injury or overcoming resistance to anti-EGFR treatment.

A Comparison Between First-, Second- and Third-Generation Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Patients with Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer and Brain Metastases

Patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), harboring Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) mutations, are more susceptible to brain metastases (BM). Comparisons of the efficacy of different-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) on BMs from NSCLC are currently limited. We identified studies comparing different EGFR-TKIs for NSCLC through Pubmed literature search and selected those with neurological outcome data. By two retrospective analyses, Erlotinib showed longer neurological time-to-progression (30 months vs. 15.8 months, P = 0.024) and reduced the risk of central nervous system (CNS) progression (Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.25; 95% CI, 0.08–0.81; P = 0.021) compared to Gefitinib. In a phase 2b randomized trial, 16% of patients with BMs had a similar Progression Free Survival (PFS) (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.41–1.44) or Overall Survival (OS) (HR 1.16, 95% CI 0.61–2.21) with Afatinib versus Gefitinib; a lower risk of developing subsequent BMs with Afatinib than Gefitinib (HR 0.49; 95% CI 0.34–0.71; P < 0.001) was reported by a retrospective study. A randomized phase 3 trial proved that patients with BMs treated with Osimertinib had longer PFS (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.30–0.74) and OS (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.61–1.01) than with Gefitinib, and lower incidence of CNS progression (6% vs. 15%, respectively). Although there is limited evidence, differences in CNS activity may exist between EGFR-TKIs.

Treatment Options of First-Line Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors and Subsequent Systemic Chemotherapy Agents for Advanced EGFR Mutant Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients: Implications From Taiwan Cancer Registry Cohort

Objectives

Large-scale, population-based real-world studies on the treatment outcomes of first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and subsequent systemic chemotherapy agents for lung adenocarcinoma (with activating epidermal growth factor receptor [EGFR] mutations) remain limited.

Materials and Methods

From March 2014 to December 2016, patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma, identified from the Taiwan Cancer Registry were included in this study if they received any of the three TKIs as first-line treatment. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). The secondary outcome was time-to-treatment discontinuation (TTD).

Results

A total of 4,889 patients (median age: 67 years and two-thirds with distant metastasis) were recruited (1,778 gefitinib, 1,599 erlotinib, and 1,512 afatinib users). A 1:1 propensity score (PS)-matched cohorts of 1,228 afatinib/erlotinib and 1054 afatinib/gefitinib was created. After PS matching, it was found that afatinib was not associated with better OS (afatinib vs. erlotinib, HR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.86–1.07; afatinib vs. gefitinib, HR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.81–1.02). In the subgroup analysis, afatinib demonstrated a survival benefit in patients with active smoking (afatinib vs. erlotinib, HR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.51–0.93; afatinib vs. gefitinib, HR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.48–0.94) and ECOG > 1 (afatinib vs. erlotinib, HR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.63–0.99; afatinib vs. gefitinib, HR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.62–0.98). A total of 41.1% (n = 1992) of first-line TKI users received subsequent chemotherapy. Among the three TKI groups, pemetrexed usage was associated with better OS compared with other chemotherapy agents, with the exception of gemcitabine in the afatinib and gefitinib groups. Pemetrexed and gemcitabine had the longest TTD of 3–4 months.

Conclusions

Among patients with EGFR mutant lung adenocarcinoma, afatinib use may not provide longer OS compared with first-generation TKIs. Afatinib may be preferably considered among patients with active smoking and should not be withheld among those with worse performance status. With 40% of patients receiving subsequent chemotherapy, pemetrexed may be the preferred agent, while gemcitabine can be a reasonable alternative.

Comprehensive identification, fragmentation pattern, and metabolic pathways of gefitinib metabolites via UHPLC-Q-TOF-MS/MS: in vivo study of rat plasma, urine, bile, and faeces

Gefitinib, the first approved inhibitor for oral epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), has been proved to be effective in non-small cell lung cancer with EGFR mutation. However, there are many metabolites of gefitinib that have not been identified in vivo. This study aims to identify the metabolites of gefitinib and its metabolic pathways in rats using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with a quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (UHPLC-Q-TOF-MS/MS) detector. Protein precipitation, solid-phase and ultrasonic extraction were used for the pre-treatment of plasma, urine, bile and faeces samples. In this study, a total of 28 compounds were identified in rat plasma, 29 in bile, 20 in urine and 16 in faeces. 20 new compounds were firstly reported as metabolites of gefitinib. Reduction, hydroxylation, dealkylation and dehalogenation were the major metabolic pathways in phase I. For phase II, the main pathways were sulphate and glucuronide conjugation. The fragment ions of gefitinib and its metabolites were usually generated via the fracture of C₁-O bond of propoxy on the C₆ position of aniline quinazoline ring. The results may be valuable and important for understanding the metabolic process of gefitinib in clinical application and drug safety.

Pre-Existing Diabetes Limits Survival Rate After Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Treatment for Advanced Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Study in Japan

BACKGROUND

Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are promising in the treatment of advanced cancer, their use is associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs) that affect endocrine organ systems. Although development of irAEs was associated with improved cancer-specific survival, the risk of irAEs is unclear. We investigated the association of pre-ICI comorbidities-including diabetes-with irAEs, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) in advanced lung cancer.

METHODS

Patients with lung cancer who were treated with ICIs during the period from September 1, 2015 through July 31, 2018 were retrospectively enrolled. All data were collected from the NEPTUNE database of university patients. Hazard ratios were estimated by using Cox regression weighted for propensity scores. Odds ratios were calculated by logistic regression and adjusted for unbalanced variables. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare OS, and the generalized Wilcoxon test was used to compare median survival.

RESULTS

Among the 88 patients identified, 22 (25.0%) had diabetes (DM) before ICI treatment and 57 (75.0%) did not (non-DM); irAEs developed in 12.2% of patients with DM and in 9.1% of patients in non-DM (p=0.87). Diabetes status was not associated with irAE risk in relation to baseline characteristics (age, sex, TNM staging, thyroid and renal function) or in propensity score-matched analysis (age, TNM staging). During a mean follow-up of 30 months, OS and cancer-specific PFS were significantly higher in patients who developed irAEs (Kaplan-Meier estimates, p=0·04 and 0·03, respectively). In propensity score-matched analysis, diabetes was significantly associated with lower OS (multivariate hazard ratio, 0·36; 95% CI, 0·13-0·98) unrelated to irAEs. Irrespective of irAEs, PFS was also lower among patients with DM than among non-DM patients (Kaplan-Meier estimate, p=0·04).

CONCLUSION

Pre-existing diabetes was associated with higher mortality in advanced lung cancer, regardless of irAE development during treatment with ICI.

Association of tumor mutation burden and epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor history with survival in patients with metastatic stage III/IV non-small-cell lung cancer: A retrospective study

OBJECTIVES

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. However, factors associated with the survival of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received only hospice care are largely unclear. In this study, we aimed to determine the prognostic factors correlated with survival in patients with advanced NSCLC who had undergone hospice care only.

METHODS

A total of 102 patients with recurrent stage III/IV NSCLC after traditional treatment failure were investigated. Survival was measured from the date of enrollment to December 2019 or the time of death. Tumor tissues were collected, and DNA sequencing was performed to identify somatic mutations. Data on clinical factors of patients were collected and analyzed by univariate and multivariate analyses. Overall survival analysis was conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

The 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year overall survival rates of the 102 patients with metastatic NSCLC were 17.65%, 3.92%, and 0.98%, respectively. The median overall survival of the 102 patients was 3.15 months. Tumor location in the peripheral lung, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor history, low tumor mutation load, adenocarcinoma, and poor performance status score were associated with prolonged survival compared with tumor location in the central lung, no EGFR inhibitor history, high tumor mutation load, squamous cell carcinoma, and good performance status score (p=0.045, p=0.003, p=0.045, p=0.021, and p=0.0003, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

EGFR inhibitor treatment history and tumor mutation load are risk factors for the overall survival of patients with stage III/IV NSCLC who have undergone only hospice care. These results provide a critical clinical basis for further study of nontraditional anti-tumor responses induced by EGFR inhibitors.

The cost-effectiveness of dacomitinib in first-line treatment of advanced/metastatic epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (EGFRm NSCLC) in Sweden

AIMS

Although the benefit of first-line epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) over chemotherapy in EGFR mutation-positive (EGFRm) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been demonstrated in clinical trials, the optimal treatment sequence remains unclear. The objective of our study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of dacomitinib in Sweden vs afatinib and osimertinib in first-line treatment of EGFRm NSCLC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A partitioned survival model was developed with three health states: progression-free, post-progression, and death. Progression-free and overall survival curves were used to inform movements between states. Clinical data were taken from randomized trials, compared via a network meta-analysis (NMA). Utility data were taken from published studies and costs from national Swedish sources. The model used a 15-year time horizon and a Swedish healthcare payer perspective. Sensitivity and scenario analyses were performed.

RESULTS

The base-case analysis showed that dacomitinib accrued a total of 2.10 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) at a total cost of Swedish krona (SEK) 874,615. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for dacomitinib vs afatinib was SEK 461,556 per QALY gained. The ICER of osimertinib vs dacomitinib, where the small QALY gains of the former came at a high additional cost, was SEK 11,444,709. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of these results; changes to drug and medical resource use costs and overall survival had the greatest impact on ICER estimates.

LIMITATIONS

This model is subject to uncertainty associated with extrapolating long-term treatment effects from shorter trial follow-up periods, although this would also be a limitation when using direct comparison or time-dependent hazard ratios. The NMA was limited by the use of indirect comparison, although sensitivity analyses supported the robustness of our findings.

CONCLUSIONS

Our model demonstrated that dacomitinib is cost-effective for first-line EGFRm NSCLC treatment in Sweden vs afatinib and osimertinib.

Treatment of advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer: First line, maintenance and second line - Indian consensus statement update

The management of advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients is becoming increasingly complex with the identification of driver mutations/rearrangements and development/availability of appropriate targeted therapies. In 2017, an expert group of medical oncologists with expertise in treating lung cancer used data from published literature and experience to arrive at practical consensus recommendations on treatment of advanced NSCLC for use by the community oncologists. This was published subsequently in the Indian Journal of Cancer with a plan to be updated annually. The present document is an update to the 2017 document.

First-line treatment with irreversible tyrosine kinase inhibitors associated with longer OS in EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer

Background

Few studies have compared the efficacy of the irreversible epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR‐TKI), afatinib, with that of reversible EGFR‐TKIs. Therefore, this study assessed the effectiveness of afatinib, erlotinib, and gefitinib in terms of OS (overall survival) and progression‐free survival (PFS) in EGFR mutation‐positive advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

Methods

Patients with EGFR mutation‐positive advanced NSCLC who sought treatment from December 2013 to June 2018, at a tertiary referral center were retrospectively analyzed. These patients were treated with afatinib or a reversible EGFR‐TKI (erlotinib or gefitinib) until disease progression, intolerable adverse events, or death. The Kaplan‐Meier and log‐rank tests were then used to compare the OS and PFS of the patients. We further analyzed the survival differences among the subgroup of patients without brain metastases.

Results

Of the 363 patients enrolled, 134 and 229 received first‐line afatinib and first‐line reversible EGFR‐TKI, respectively. Those given afatinib had better OS (39.3 vs. 26.0 months; HR 0.65, P = 0.033) and PFS (14.1 vs.11.2 months; HR 0.58, P < 0.001). Of the 246 patients without brain metastases, 93 and 153 received first‐line afatinib and a first‐line reversible EGFR‐TKI, respectively. Those given afatinib had a better OS (52.6 vs. 24.9 months; HR 0.62, P = 0.0030) and PFS (17.7 vs. 11.1 months; HR 0.51, P < 0.001). The survival benefit was more significant in the subgroup of patients with L858R substitutions.

Conclusions

The results indicated that afatnib resulted in significantly better OS and PFS than gefitnib and erlotinib for EGFR mutation‐positive advanced NSCLC patients without brain metastases.

Key points

Significant findings of the study

Afatnib resulted in significantly better overall survival and progression‐free survival than gefitnib and erlotinib for EGFR mutation‐positive advanced non‐small cell lung cancer patients without brain metastases.

What this study adds

This study helps fill the gap in our limited understanding of the differences in the efficacy of the irreversible epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR‐TKI), afatinib, with that of reversible EGFR‐TKIs.

Updated Overall Survival in a Randomized Study Comparing Dacomitinib with Gefitinib as First-Line Treatment in Patients with Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer and EGFR-Activating Mutations

BACKGROUND

ARCHER 1050, an ongoing, randomized, open-label, phase III trial of dacomitinib versus gefitinib in newly diagnosed patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and an EGFR-activating mutation, reported significant improvement in overall survival (OS) with dacomitinib.

OBJECTIVE

This paper reports an updated OS analysis of ARCHER 1050 after an extended follow-up.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this multinational, multicenter trial, adults (aged ≥ 18 years or ≥ 20 years in Japan and Korea) with newly diagnosed NSCLC and EGFR mutation (exon 19 deletion or exon 21 L858R substitution), and no history of central nervous system metastases, were randomized 1:1 to receive dacomitinib 45 mg/day (n = 227) or gefitinib 250 mg/day (n = 225). Randomization was stratified by race and EGFR mutation type. An ad hoc updated analysis of OS was conducted at the protocol-defined cut-off of 48 months from first dosing of the last enrolled patient (13 May 2019).

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 47.9 months, 133 (58.6%) patients had died in the dacomitinib arm and 152 (67.6%) in the gefitinib arm. The hazard ratio (HR) for OS was 0.748 (95% CI 0.591-0.947; two-sided P = 0.0155); median OS was 34.1 months with dacomitinib versus 27.0 months with gefitinib. The HR for OS in patients with dose reduction(s) in the dacomitinib arm (n = 154) compared with all patients in the gefitinib arm was 0.554 (95% CI 0.420-0.730); median OS was 42.5 months for patients with dose reduction(s) in the dacomitinib arm. The most common adverse events were diarrhea (87.7%), paronychia (61.7%), dermatitis acneiform (49.3%), and stomatitis (43.6%) with dacomitinib, and diarrhea (55.8%) and alanine aminotransferase increased (40.2%) with gefitinib.

CONCLUSIONS

The OS benefit from first-line treatment with dacomitinib versus gefitinib was maintained after extended follow-up in patients with advanced NSCLC with EGFR-activating mutations. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT01774721 (registered 24 January 2013).